In Maryland those who were unquiet and did not like the proprietor’s

government took advantage of the time to overthrow it. There were men

enough who had watched for such a chance. Though discontent with the

proprietor’s government had met very sharp frustration and rebuke twelve

years ago, when Davis and Pate went to the gallows for the treason of

emulating the example of Mr. Bacon in Virginia, as many wanted a change

now as had wanted it then, and this new opportunity seemed made for any

who chose to act upon its invitation. The mere fact of being governed

like a private estate and mediæval county palatine was very irksome

to the more ambitious spirits of the colony; and the more closely and

sedulously the proprietor attended to his government the more irksome did

it become. He dealt very harshly with opposition; he openly interfered

with elections to the assembly; he disallowed and set aside such

legislation as he did not like; he gave the offices of government to

men of his own kin or personal following; and the taxes were not always

spent for the public benefit. It was like the government of Virginia

with a petty king in residence. And that petty king, every one knew, was

of the popish party, whose part the great King at home had played to

his own undoing. Men fancied they saw new popish plots in every trivial

incident or shifting of affairs. If the panic had touched New York and

turned her government upside down, it was little to be wondered at that

it touched Maryland also. Richard Talbot, Duke of Tyrconnel, the officer

who reduced Ireland “from a place of briskest trade and best paid rents

in Christendom to ruin and desolation,” and who had dared hold it for

James Stuart, despite the Parliament in London and the authority of

the Prince of Orange, was of Lord Baltimore’s kin and his very close

friend; and Maryland teemed as no other colony did with Roman Catholic

partisans. Lord Baltimore was, in fact, no laggard in his loyalty. He

promptly despatched instructions out of England commanding the immediate

proclamation of King William and Queen Mary to the province; but his

messenger died on the way, and Maryland seemed to lag behind the other

colonies in her loyalty. Upon which one John Coode, and some others,

pretending, perhaps believing, that the proprietor’s officers in the

colony meant to defy the crown and establish papacy, got together an

“Association in Arms for the Defence of the Protestant religion, and

for asserting the right of King William and Queen Mary to the Province

of Maryland and all the English dominions,” officers of the militia and

the very Speaker of the colonial House acting with them; seized the

government of the colony (1689); convinced the King of their sincerity

and good faith in what had been done, though many of the best people in

the colony protested; ruled as their party pleased for two years; and

then welcomed a royal governor (1692). They had made Maryland a royal

province out of hand. Lord Baltimore was henceforth to receive only his

quit-rents and the proceeds of the export duties.

[Illustration: MAP OF NEW YORK IN 1695]

It was a Protestant revolution with a vengeance. Taxes were ordered

levied for the support of the Church of England. The immigration of

Roman Catholics was prohibited and the public celebration of the mass

forbidden by law. The seat of government was removed from St. Mary’s,

where the Catholic families held sway to whom the colony had owed

its establishment, and set up at Providence, presently to be known

as Annapolis, where the Protestant influence centred. Maryland was

transformed.

Everywhere in the colonies there was doubt for a little while what

government to obey, until things should be settled in England, and his

Majesty King William should have time to turn his attention to affairs in

America. Nowhere was the doubt more embarrassing than in East and West

Jersey, which seemed left without any general government at all. Formal

negotiations had been afoot in 1688, the very year of the revolution, for

the surrender of the rights of the East Jersey proprietors to the crown;

repeated transfers of proprietorship and redivisions of jurisdiction,

both by private sale and public grant, had from the first sadly confused

authority in the province; and when news came of what had happened in

England, some doubted whether there were either royal authority or

private right for the government of the growing hamlets of either colony.

Affairs presently settled even there, however, to their normal frame

again. For quite fourteen years longer the proprietors kept their right

to appoint governors and exercise superintendence there. The settlers in

the two provinces, moreover, were for the most part hard-headed English

and Scottish people, who were not to be disconcerted in the management

of their own affairs by trouble in England or the mere lack of a settled

general government. For quite three years (1689-1692) they waited,

without disturbance or excitement or any unusual interruption of their

quiet life, under the direction of their town and county officers; until

at last they learned what their government as a province was to be. There

were already five organized counties in East Jersey, and had been these

twenty years, since before the second coming of the Dutch (1674); and ten

thousand people crowded their little towns and the cleared spaces of the

forest about them. West Jersey, on the other side of the forests, by the

Delaware, had grown almost as fast. Both provinces had the means and the

men to take care of themselves.

It was not very long, after all, before government became a settled

and ordered power again under the new King. William of Orange was a

businesslike master, a real governor, not likely to do less, likely,

rather, to do more, than either James or Charles in the government of

the colonies; and the colonies felt the power of his systematic way of

rule very soon. The old charters of Connecticut and Rhode Island were

presently recognized again and confirmed; but Massachusetts, instead of

her old, got a new charter. Plymouth lost her separate rights altogether

and was merged with Massachusetts; and many things were changed. It must

have seemed to the older men in the towns of the Plymouth grant as if the

old freedom and dignity of their life had been done away with forever.

Plymouth was the oldest of the northern colonies, and had kept through

all the long seventy years of her separate life not a little of the fine

temper, the sober resoluteness, steadfastness, moderation, and nobility

given to her at the first by her pilgrim founders. Surely the King’s

advisers had forgotten her story when they thus summarily and without

compunction handed her government and territory over to Massachusetts, to

be, as it were, obliterated and robbed of their identity! But such, it

seemed, was their way of bringing system into the administration of the

northern colonies.

[Illustration: SIR WILLIAM PHIPS]

The new charter was granted in 1691. It not only joined Plymouth to

Massachusetts, but Maine also, carrying the northern borders of the

province to the very banks of the St. Lawrence. But, though it extended

her boundaries, it curtailed her liberties, and it was this that the

men of the Bay principally noted. Their governor was thenceforth to be

appointed by the crown. There were to be courts of admiralty, customs

officers, and a post-office service directly dependent upon the ministers

in London. There was to be a representative General Court, almost

as before, consisting of the governor, his council, and a house of

deputies, and the governor’s council of twenty-eight was to be every

year, after the first, elected by the General Court itself, in which the

people’s representatives predominated. Only the General Court could lay

taxes and make general laws. But the King’s governor was to have the

right to veto any law of which he did not approve, and the crown behind

him might set the Court’s enactments aside, as disallowed, at any time

within three years after they were passed. All the old rules as to who

should vote for deputies, too, were changed. The right to vote was no

longer to be confined to members of the Puritan churches; it was to be

exercised by every man who had forty pounds’ worth of personal property,

or a freehold estate in land worth two pounds a year. Judges were to be

appointed by the governor and council; all other officials of the colony

by the governor alone.

It was something to have one of their own fellow colonists, a familiar

figure among them, at least, for their first governor under the new

arrangement, though that did not alter his powers, and he was hardly

the man they would themselves have chosen. Sir William Phips was only a

rough, pushing, self-made sailor, one of the youngest of the twenty-one

sons of an humble gunsmith in a little settlement close by the mouth of

the far-away Kennebec. He had been a ship’s carpenter, a common seaman, a

ship’s captain,—always sanguine, always adventurous, always on the make,

risking everything to win his way, and as cheerful and hearty and full

of confident plans when he had lost as when he had won. At last he had

actually made the fortune he was in quest of, by finding and recovering

the treasure of a sunken Spanish galleon in the southern seas. He had

been much in England, and had won favor in the court and out of it by his

bluff and honest energy and unfailing good-will, and his breezy manners,

brought fresh from the salt seas. King James had knighted him Sir William

for the Spanish treasure he brought into England, and had made him high

sheriff of New England when Sir Edmund Andros was governor there. In the

year 1690, the year before the new charter was signed, he had led an

expedition into the north and taken Acadia from the French, with much

excellent private plunder, and then had failed in an expedition against

Quebec. He was no statesman, and it was not pleasant for any man to be

the first governor under the new charter; but bluff Sir William, known to

every man in Boston, was better than a stranger might have been.

[Illustration: PHIPS RECOVERING THE SUNKEN TREASURE]

The new King’s coming to the throne in England had brought war in

its train, a long war with the French, as every one had foreseen it

must.—“King William’s War,” they called it in the colonies; and war with

the French meant fear and massacre on the northern borders, where the

French were but too apt at stirring the Indians to their fierce attacks

even in times of peace. It was this war Jacob Leisler had heard would

surely bring French ships into New York and a Roman Catholic government.

It gave Sir William Phips leave to make his expeditions against the

north, for adventure and profit, instead.

In 1692 a distemper showed itself at Salem, in Massachusetts, which

seemed for a little blacker than war itself,—an ominous distemper of

the mind. It was the year of frenzy against what men fancied to be

witchcraft, and Salem, where the chief madness was, saw nineteen persons

swing upon her gallows hill for commerce with the devil. Some really

believed them witches; some schemed to send their personal enemies to

the gallows with a false charge. Governor Phips was induced to appoint

special courts for the trial of the witches; and a long year went by

before men’s better thoughts, natural pity, and awakened consciences

called a halt upon the murderous frenzy, and Salem, with all the

province, tried to forget what had been done to the innocent.

[Illustration: WILLIAM PENN’S RESIDENCE IN 1699]

[Illustration: AN INTERVIEW BETWEEN SIR EDMUND ANDROS AND JAMES BLAIR]

In that year, 1692, the King appointed Benjamin Fletcher to be governor

of New York, and of Pennsylvania as well, which he was instructed to

bring within his jurisdiction, for the consolidation of government; and

Sir Lionel Copley, appointed in 1691, became royal governor of Maryland.

Sir Edmund Andros, too, was that year once more commissioned governor,

this time of Virginia, and stayed there full five years, a quieter if not

a wiser man than in the days of King James. The Virginians did not wholly

dislike him, taking him for what he was, a rough soldier, more efficient

than patient, who meant to do his duty according to his instructions,

but did not know how to do it in the wise way for his own interests and

the general peace. He honestly devoted himself to the welfare of the

colony, encouraged the growth of cotton in order that cloth might be

made, improved the methods of administration, and sought in more than one

way to better the sources of wealth. But the Virginians liked as little

as the other colonists did his zeal in the enforcement of the acts of

trade; and his arbitrary temper ruined him at last by bringing him into

collision with James Blair.

Andros’s predecessor in the governorship of Virginia had been Francis

Nicholson, a man who had been hardly more than a tool of James’s tyranny

a little while before in New York, but who was at heart something

better than a mere placeman. He was intemperate, and in private often

showed himself gross and licentious; but he had some of the gifts of a

statesman, and in quiet Virginia devoted himself very steadily to the

welfare of the people he governed, no less than to the advancement of

the general interests of the crown. James Blair had found in him an

intelligent friend, and not an opponent, when he sought to set up a

college in the colony. A great deal of Virginian politics centred in Mr.

Blair. He was a Scotsman bred to orders in the English Church, and was

but thirty-six when Sir Edmund Andros was made governor of Virginia. He

had come to the colony in 1685, at twenty-nine; and in 1690, the year

Mr. Nicholson became governor, he had been appointed commissary for

Virginia by the Bishop of London. Virginia was supposed to lie within the

see of London, and as the bishop’s commissary there it was Mr. Blair’s

duty to inspect, report upon, and administer discipline in the church

of the colony. He made it his first task to establish a college,—the

assembly, the governor, and every true friend of Virginia at his back

in the enterprise,—in order that education might sustain order and

enlightenment. The King granted a charter and revenues to the college

in 1692; the merchants of London subscribed right handsomely; Governor

Nicholson handed over to it three hundred and fifty pounds voted to him

by the assembly; and Virginia at last had the college she had wished and

planned for ever since the days of Sir George Yeardley. It was agreed

that it should be called the College of William and Mary.

[Illustration: THE FIRST CHURCH IN NEWARK, NEW JERSEY]

But when Sir Edmund Andros came, Mr. Nicholson being sent to administer

the affairs of Maryland, it was found, after a few years’ trial, that

he and Mr. Blair could not live in the same colony. Mr. Blair was as

hot-tempered as Sir Edmund, and spoke his mind in as choleric and

unstinted a way. But Mr. Blair, though he was often boisterous, generally

managed, after the canny Scots manner, to be right as well, and generally

had both the law and the interests of the colony on his side when it came

to a contest, while Sir Edmund had a great talent for putting himself in

the wrong. When at last it came to a breach between the two, therefore,

as it did, Sir Edmund lost and Mr. Blair won. Sir Edmund was recalled to

England, and Mr. Nicholson was named governor once more. It was a long

time before Mr. Blair ceased to reign in Virginia. Mr. Nicholson became

instrumental in removing the capital from Jamestown, which Mr. Bacon had

burned, to Williamsburg, more wholesomely placed, ten miles back from

the river. The college also had been placed there; and there Mr. Blair

continued to preside as governors came and went.

For the _authorities_ and _sources_ for this period, see

the references under Sections I. to V. and VII. to IX. of

this chapter, so far as they cover the later years of the

seventeenth century.

END OF VOL. I.

A history of the American people, Vol. 1 [of 5] · 第 17 / 17 段