The _original sources_ of Virginian history are to be found

in Captain John Smith’s _True Relation of Such Occurences as

Have Happened in Virginia_, published in 1608, and _Generall

Historie_, published in 1624, both of which many modern readers

are inclined to take with a grain of salt; in the _Collections_

of the Virginia Historical Society (which, among many other

important things, contain the Proceedings of the Virginia

Company from 1619 to 1624); in W. W. Hening’s invaluable and

remarkable collection of the _Statutes at Large_ of Virginia,

which begins with the acts of the first assembly, in 1619, and

is brought down, with scarcely an omission, to the end of the

eighteenth century; in Sainsbury’s _Calendar of_ [English]

_State Papers, Colonial_, I. and V.; in the two volumes of

Mr. Alexander Brown’s _Genesis of the United States_, which

is a notable mine of material; in Peter Force’s _Tracts and

Other Papers Relating to the Colonies in North America_; in

the _Collections_ of the Massachusetts Historical Society;

in the notable collection of papers gathered under the

title _Archaeologia Americana_; in the _Virginia Historical

Register_; in the _Virginia Magazine of History and Biography_;

and in the _Southern Literary Messenger_.

II. NEW NETHERLAND AND NEW PLYMOUTH

Meanwhile other colonies were being successfully planted in the north.

On the great river St. Lawrence, which doughty Jacques Cartier had

explored quite seventy years before, the French had set up trading-posts

at Montreal and Quebec. They had established, besides, a struggling

settlement or two nearer the mouth of the river; and to the southward,

within the Bay of Fundy. A little colony of Englishmen had begun to make

homes for themselves in Newfoundland. Dutch traders were established

on the Hudson. A company of English dissenters were building a New

Plymouth within Cape Cod, and little groups of English adventurers were

trying to secure a foothold upon the southern shores of the wide Bay

of Massachusetts. Nowhere except in Virginia had more than a beginning

been made; but the settlement of the continent seemed at last to have

been begun in earnest; and the future looked interesting enough with the

French, the Dutch, and the English all entered as active competitors in

the race for possession.

The Dutch were likely to be harder rivals to beat than the French. Their

little, compact home states in the Netherlands were, it is true, scarcely

one-fourth as big as England, but they teemed with a thrifty people

almost as numerous as the English themselves, and their chief power was

upon the sea. With them, at home, the very land itself was one-half sea.

They had been bred fishermen and mariners time out of mind; and of late,

because the Spaniard provoked them to it, they had put great fleets on

the high seas and had made conquests at the ends of the earth.

[Illustration: VIEW OF QUEBEC ABOUT 1732]

At first they had not thought of conquest. They had simply made

themselves, with their stout craft and seasoned tars, the ocean carriers

for Europe,—because the Portuguese, who had captured rich lands and

set up a great trade all the way from the Persian Gulf to Japan, did

not trouble themselves to bring their cargoes beyond their own port of

Lisbon, and because the Spaniards brought their treasures out of South

America no farther than Seville, and some one was needed to carry what

they would sell to the merchants and princes of the rest of Europe. No

doubt the Dutch would have been content to be only traders and carriers,

had Spain but let them alone. But Spain, in her folly, undertook to force

the Dutch to be Roman Catholics; and they, being stout Protestants and

stubborn men, resisted after a fashion that in the end set the whole

power of rich Spain at naught. The war began in 1568; all Europe was

stirred by it; and when, forty-one years later, the Spaniard, quite out

of breath, agreed to a truce, the world had changed. Holland had become

a great sea-power; had driven the Portuguese from the Orient, taking

their trade and their colonies; was sinking imperial fleets upon the very

coasts of Spain herself, and sweeping Spanish treasure by the ship’s

cargo into her own coffers. She was beforehand even with England in

making herself mistress of the seas, and had turned to this new task of

taking possession of America with confidence and audacity.

[Illustration: TITLE-PAGE OF JOHN SMITH’S “DESCRIPTION OF NEW ENGLAND”]

The Dutch combined conquest with trade, as England did, and it was a

Dutch East India Company of merchants which drove the Portuguese from

their possessions in the East, as it was an English East India Company of

merchants which afterwards conquered India for England. And when their

East India Company had made itself powerful and famous by its conquests

and adventures, the Dutch formed a West India Company also, to trade and

take what it could upon the western coasts of Africa, upon both coasts of

South America, and among the southern islands of the Atlantic. It had, as

Mr. Motley has said, a roving commission to trade and fight and govern

for twenty-four years; and it incidentally undertook to establish Dutch

settlements on the Hudson and the Delaware. Henry Hudson, an English

sailor in the service of the Dutch East India Company, had, in the year

1609, discovered the great river which was to bear his name,—the very

year the baffled Spanish agreed to a truce with the redoubtable states

of the Netherlands. He had also entered the great bay and stream of

the Delaware. The Dutch had promptly named the Hudson the “Great North

River,” the Delaware the “South River,” and all the rich country which

lay about and between them “New Netherland”; meaning from the first to

keep and occupy what their seamen had found.

[Illustration: EARLIEST VIEW OF NEW AMSTERDAM]

There had been a New Netherland Company, formed in 1614, before there

was a West India Company. Its charter had given it commercial control of

all the coast country of America from forty to forty-five degrees north

latitude, a region which the Dutch described as lying “between New France

[on the north] and Virginia.” This was at the very heart of the country

which James of England had granted to the Virginia Company; but the Dutch

knew little of that, and would very likely have thought as little had

they known more. It was the profitable fur trade with the Indians of the

Great North River that had first attracted them. Individual adventurers

among them had built a small “fort” or trading post far up the river in

the heart of the wilderness, as well as a little group of huts on the

seaward point of Manhattan Island in the bay, and had been trafficking

there with the willing natives for quite four years before they formed

their New Netherland Company.

It was the New Netherland Company that grew into the greater West India

Company, whose principal business it was to be to wrest what it could

from the Portuguese and the Spanish in the south, but which was also

to keep an eye all the while on the North and South rivers, where the

New Netherland Company had put its trading posts. It was 1623 before

the great company found time amid its other business to carry out any

systematic plans of settlement in North America; but by 1625 there were

already two hundred colonists on the lands they claimed: some up the

great stream of the North River at the little post which they called Fort

Orange, some within the South River at “Fort Nassau,” some on Manhattan

Island, a few on Long Island,—even a little group of families as far away

as the “Fresh River,” which the English were to call the Connecticut.

It remained to be seen how they would fare scattered there in the

wilderness; but there they were, a very hard people to discourage, by the

time Virginia was fairly established in its own scattered settlements on

the James, and the rights of the great Virginia Company taken into the

hands of the King,—and there they meant to stay.

[Illustration: DEPARTURE OF THE PILGRIMS FROM DELFT HAVEN]

Meanwhile there had come out from Holland itself a band of exiled English

settlers, to be their neighbors and rivals at the north, and so put

them between two growing English colonies,—not “between New France and

Virginia,” as their first charter had said, but between New England and

Virginia. The new-comers were exchanging a temporary exile in Holland for

a permanent exile in America, and effected their settlement within the

sheltering arm of Cape Cod. Englishmen had begun to muster many thousands

strong in Holland within a generation, and the two countries had been

drawn very near to each other. Long before the war began which brought

Spain and the Netherlands to a grapple, hundreds of English merchants

had established themselves in the Dutch seaports; and young Englishmen

were beginning, even before dissenters were shut out from Oxford and

Cambridge, to resort in influential numbers to the Dutch universities.

When the Low Countries grappled with Spain, English volunteers crowded

into their armies. The troops Elizabeth sent over after 1585 found the

Dutch ranks already full of their countrymen. English churchmen, too,

for whom the policy of the Establishment proved too rigorous under the

imperious Tudor queens, had learned to seek in Holland the freedom of

worship denied them at home. At the same time refugees from the ravage

and slaughter of Alva’s armies poured across the sea from the lower

Netherlands into England, and the two countries seemed to be exchanging

populations. Tradesmen, weavers, mechanics, farmers, fled terror-stricken

into the eastern and southern counties of England, often braving the

sea in open boats when danger pressed most desperately. Their coveted

skill and industry, which English statesmen knew how to value, their

foreign birth and humble rank in life, which seemed to depress them

below the level of political influence, gained for them an indulgence in

theological error and separate worship which was denied to Englishmen

themselves, and presently the English towns in the east and south teemed

with thousands of Dutch artisans, who were suffered to be Anabaptists,

Lutherans,—what they would, so long as they taught England the industries

and handicrafts which were to make her rich.

[Illustration: THE MAYFLOWER IN PLYMOUTH HARBOR]

The little company of Englishmen who, in 1620, exchanged Holland for

America were not soldiers and traders like the men who had led and

established the colony at Jamestown, but members, most of them, of a

humble congregation of dissenters who had fled from the very districts

of their native land in which foreign heretics were tolerated, to escape

the tyrannical surveillance of the Church, and who had found a refuge

for a time in the great university town of Leyden. They came now to

America because they did not wish their children to become Dutch or lose

altogether their English speech and customs, and because they could look

to have an even more untrammelled freedom upon the fruitful coasts of

the New World than in the ancient states of the Netherlands, into whose

life they found themselves thrust like those who must be always aliens.

They were Protestants, and had left England because they could not brook

the domination of her Church; and yet the reason for their exile was as

much political as religious. Many men in England, some of them high in

the counsels of the Church itself, held the same doctrines that they

held,—the doctrines which Calvin had made the creed and fundamental

basis of belief among all Protestants of the sterner sort,—and yet were

not exiles, because they had not broken, as these men had, with the

discipline and authority of the Church.

England’s Protestantism had a color and character of its own. Her

“Reformation” had struck at the roots of nothing except the authority

of the Pope at Rome. Her Church had always deemed itself national, had

always held itself less subject than other churches to be ruled by papal

delegates, or turned this way or that by the vicissitudes of continental

politics and the policies of the papal state. She had broken with Rome at

last, when the Reformation came, not because she was deeply stirred in

thought and conscience by the doubts and the principles of belief which

Luther had put afloat to the upsetting of Europe, so much as because

her King, the wilful Henry, was vexed by the restraints put upon his

marriages and divorces by the papal authority, and therefore chose to

lead her still further along upon the road of independence to which her

position and her pride inclined her, in religion no less than in politics.

[Illustration: HOUSE IN PLYMOUTH, ENGLAND, WHERE THE MAYFLOWER PILGRIMS

WERE ENTERTAINED]

When the change had been made, stupendous as it looked amid the ruin of

the monastic houses which the King had promptly despoiled, Englishmen

found themselves very little more at liberty than before to choose

forms of worship or of church government for themselves. The Church

had become more than ever a part of the state. The King was its head

and master, instead of the Pope. He did not insist very much upon

matters of doctrine, being himself in no case to set an example in that

kind; but he did insist upon the authority of the Church in matters of

government,—upon uniformity in worship and in discipline; because the

discipline of the Church was now the discipline of the state, and part

of his own sovereignty. He deemed schism a form of disloyalty, though

opinion, if it kept within discreet bounds, he would not too curiously

look into. It was an easy enough rule. Things might have gone very

quietly and with a normal growth and liberalization, had not Mary, a

fanatical Catholic, become Queen, and tried forthwith to force every one

in the kingdom back into the Church of Rome; had not Elizabeth, in her

turn, proved so absolute a martinet in every matter of obedience to the

crown,—in matters which affected the Church no less than in matters which

affected only her crown and government. Mary drove those who resisted

her to the stake, or out of the kingdom. Elizabeth looked shrewdly into

every movement that threatened the uniformity of worship, as changes of

opinion inevitably did, and saw to it that all men were turned to adopt

her preference.

Most persons quietly submitted. Even men of strong convictions deemed it

better to remain within the Church and purify its beliefs and practices

without schism or revolution than to fling out of it, breaking both its

unity and the peace of the country. Such men even drew together as a

distinct party of “Puritans,”—men who wished the Church to be pure and

to hold the essential doctrines of the great reformers who had given

life and substance to protestantism, but who did not mean to lead it

faster than it could go in the new ways, or to separate themselves from

it and set up a Church and worship of their own, even though it were the

excellent forms and beliefs of the church of Geneva. Others, however,

were of a more exacting conscience, a more imperious and separate way of

belief. It meant a great deal to them to have come into direct contact

with the Word of God, to have thought upon its living sentences with

the free, unbidden, individual right of interpretation of which great

Luther had set the example. It was King Henry himself who had authorized

the publication of the Bible in English, and who had commanded that it

be made accessible everywhere in the churches; and when once they had

thought upon it for themselves and had found their thought, sober and

chastened as it was, running in unsanctioned channels, some men preferred

their own consciences and their own views of the truth to obedience,

and refused to conform. They followed the example of the Dutch, now

to be found almost everywhere among them, and set up independent

congregations,—became “Separatists,” secretly and in defiance of the

crown.

[Illustration: JOHN WINTHROP]

[Illustration]

Elizabeth, bent upon being sovereign in all things, had grown harsher and

harsher towards those who would not submit to authority in matters of

belief and worship. Law upon law had been passed to prevent Englishmen

from organizing any worship of their own which the bishops did not

sanction; and whatever was law Elizabeth saw to it should be executed.

And then, when Elizabeth was gone, James of Scotland came to the throne

and completed the discomfiture and despair of those who had clung to the

Church through all that had gone before, in the hope of better times and

more liberal ways of government. He had seemed a veritable Presbyterian

so long as he was King of Scotland; but when he became King of England

also he turned out to be of another opinion. “A Scottish presbytery,”

he exclaimed, “agreeth as well with a monarchy as God with the devil.”

He was head of the Church, he declared, not only because Henry had

cast loose from Rome, but also because it was of divine ordinance and

appointment that he should be. The bishops of the Church were his agents.

“No bishop, no King,” he said; and men found that they must obey the King

in matters of religion as never before.

[Illustration: ELDER BREWSTER’S CHAIR]

It was in the disheartening days of this new tyranny that the little

company of “Separatists” fled from England into Holland who were

afterwards to seek new shelter within Cape Cod in America. They had

waited only until there should be peace between the Netherlands and

Spain; and the truce had come at last in 1609 which gave them their

freedom to go, following after scores of their countrymen who had gone

before them. They had formed their separate association for worship in

England three years before, in defiance of the law, meeting quietly in

the old manor house at Scrooby, a little hamlet just within the borders

of Nottinghamshire, on the great north road from London to Edinburgh.

They were humble folk, for the most part, of no social consequence, with

only two or three scholars among them,—William Brewster, their elder, and

John Robinson, their “teacher,” and one or two others bred at Cambridge,

men of strong convictions and an exalted sense of independence and duty,

who had been driven from the Church for nonconformity. But, humble though

they were, they could not keep their ways of worship hid from prying

eyes. The law was rigorously enforced against them, and they soon found

that they could have no peace in England.

[Illustration]

They fled first to Amsterdam, but after about a year removed to Leyden

(1609). There they made comfortable enough homes for themselves, by

dint of careful thrift and hard labor. Their new neighbors liked them

and helped them, because they found them capable, honest, and diligent.

But it was not like being in England, after all. They felt themselves

exiles all the while. Mr. Robinson, with his learning and his sweet

eloquence, made friends and found congenial tasks at the university,

where his gifts were recognized and honored; and Mr. Brewster established

himself as a teacher, “instructing students at the university, Danes and

Germans, in the English language,” and even set up a printing-press,

where books forbidden as heretical in England could be printed. Scholars

were by breeding men of the world, and could adopt the manners and

enjoy the companionships of a new country with a certain zest and

relish. Mr. Brewster had known these strange places before. Close upon

five-and-twenty years before, when the great war and tragic grapple with

Spain was at its heat, he had come into the Netherlands with William

Davison, the hard-headed Scottish Puritan whom Elizabeth was pleased

to employ as her ambassador in that quarter. He counted statesmen and

travellers and men about the sovereign’s person among his friends, and

could be well enough at ease wherever duty or employment led him. But

the majority of the little band were humble folk and found their lot

hard. Even a bare living was difficult to eke out in a strange country,

whose manners were as unfamiliar to them as its language. They saw

their children growing up, too, as the years went by, in a way that

threatened to make them as Dutch as their neighbors, and forfeit their

nationality altogether; and that was deeply distasteful to them. When

the truce approached its end, therefore, and war was again at hand, a

final argument of discouragement was added, and they determined to try

their fortunes in the New World, where Virginia had now become fairly

established and seemed secure of its future.

[Illustration: A PILGRIM BABY’S CRADLE]

They sent agents to London to speak with the managers of the Virginia

Company, and obtain leave to settle within their grant. Mr. Brewster

could go to Sir Edwin Sandys as to a man who knew him and would befriend

him willingly. He had lived at Scrooby manor house as agent of Sir

Samuel Sandys, Sir Edwin’s brother, and Sir Edwin knew his integrity

and was of too liberal a temper to distrust him for his independency in

matters of belief and worship. The exiles could count upon favor in that

quarter, now that a statesman ruled in the counsels of the great company.

They did not wish to go to Jamestown or to lose in any way their separate

organization as a congregation by being merged with plantations already

made; and for a little, while their negotiations with the Virginia

Company dragged slowly, because Sir Edwin Sandys and its other leaders

were of necessity called off to other things, they thought of entering

into some arrangement with the Dutch West India Company to secure a

separate allotment of land near the Great North River of New Netherland.

But that plan fell through, and some of them at last set forth with a

charter from the Virginia Company,—a charter conceived in the liberal

spirit of the men who had sent Sir George Yeardley out to give Virginia a

representative assembly and the full privileges of Englishmen.

By it their leaders were authorized to associate with themselves “the

gravest and discreetest” of their companions and to make for themselves

such “orders, ordinances, and constitutions for the better ordering and

directing of their business and servants” as they should deem best,

provided only that they should ordain nothing contrary to the laws of

England. They were to be from the first their own masters in making a

way to succeed. Not all could go. There was not money, there were not

ships enough. Sir Edwin Sandys, with his generous public spirit in such

matters, loaned them three hundred pounds without interest; but they had

no resources of their own, and the rest of the money they needed they

were obliged to borrow from unwilling merchants who exacted the utmost

usury, and made many delays about letting them have the little they

consented to lend. It was the month of September, 1620, before those

who could go, a hundred and two in all, got fairly upon their way, in a

single small vessel, the _Mayflower_. Mr. Brewster went with them, as

their leader, but Mr. Robinson stayed behind; for the greater number

remained, to await a later opportunity, and wished to keep their pastor

with them.

[Illustration: TITLE-PAGE OF MORTON’S “NEW ENGLISH CANAAN”]

A history of the American people, Vol. 1 [of 5] · 第 4 / 17 段