CAP PLATE, 1814-1825(?)

_USNM 60299-M (S-K 57). Figure 106._

[Illustration: FIGURE 106]

This plate, which is of brass, is of a less common design than its

predecessors. However, since there is another such plate, but of

silver-on-copper, in the national collections, it can be surmised that

pieces of this same pattern were made for use by several different

units.

A floral-bordered shield is topped by an out-sized sunburst with 13

stars, clouds, and the motto "Unity is Strength." In the center of

the shield is the eagle, with wings widely outspread and with

lightning bolts in the right talon and an olive branch in the left

talon. The lightning bolt device, obvious sign of belligerency, first

appeared about 1800 and is not seen in plates designed after 1821. The

motto and the date 1776 are far more typical of Militia than Regular

Army usage.

¶ In 1821 the Regular Army discarded all its large cap plates and

adopted the bell-crown leather cap. Militia organizations lost no time

in adopting a similar cap and, conversely, placing on it--and on the

tall beaver which followed in the 1830's--the largest plates it could

accommodate, using variations of discarded Regular Army patterns as

well as original designs.

From 1821 until well into the 1840's large cap plates were

mass-produced by manufacturers in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and

perhaps other cities of the New England metal manufacturing area. The

few early platemakers, such as Crumpton and Armitage of Philadelphia

and Peasley of Boston, were joined by a number of others. Prominent

among these were Charles John Joullain, who made plates in New York

during the 1820's, and William Pinchin of Philadelphia. Joullain is

first listed in New York directories, in 1817, as a "gilder," and so

continues through 1828. Sometimes his given name is listed as Charles,

sometimes as James, and finally as Charles James. From 1820 to 1828

his address is the same, 32 Spring Street. There is a William Pinchin

(Pinchon) listed in the Philadelphia directories as a silverplater or

silversmith almost continuously from 1785 through 1863, indicating the

possibility of a family occupation.

It is believed that some of the New England makers of uniform buttons

also manufactured plates. Among such buttonmakers of the 1820's and

1830's were R. and W. Robinson, D. Evans and Co., Leavenworth and Co.,

Benedict and Coe, and others in Connecticut and Massachusetts.

Buttonmakers often stamped their names or easily recognizable

hallmarks on the back of their products.

In most cases it is virtually impossible to ascertain the precise

units for which these different plates were first designed, and the

problem is further complicated because the maker would sell a specific

plate design to several different units. Those designs that

incorporate all or part of a state's seal were originally made for

Militia organizations of the particular state, but in several

instances these plates were sold--altered or not--to units in other

parts of the country. Militia organizations that were widely separated

geographically purchased cap plates from distant manufacturers who had

perhaps a dozen or more stock patterns to offer at a cost much lower

than that involved in making a new die from which to strike

custom-made ornaments. It made no difference to the Savannah Greys, in

Georgia, that their new cap plates were the same as those worn by

organizations in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Toward the end of

this period of large cap plates, manufacturers came out with two-piece

ornaments. After 1833, when the Regiment of United States Dragoons was

authorized its large sunburst plate with separate eagle ornament in

the center, insignia makers introduced a veritable rash of full

sunburst, three-quarter sunburst, and half-sunburst cap plates with

interchangeable centers. And for the first time small Militia units

could afford their own distinctive devices at little extra cost.

Shoulder-belt and waist-belt plates underwent the same evolution, and

by the late 1830's such plates had become a mixture of either single

die stampings or composite plates made of several parts soldered or

otherwise held onto a rectangular or oval background.

Study of cap plates and other insignia in the Huddy and Duval prints

in _U.S. Military Magazine_ points to the years between 1833 and

perhaps 1837 or 1838 as the transition period from single to composite

ornaments, years during which there was also tremendous growth in the

popularity and number of independent Militia units. In contrast to the

1820's when the Militia often waited until the Regulars discarded a

device before adopting it, in 1840 there were no less than five

organizations, mounted and dismounted, wearing the 1833 dragoon plate

in full form while it was still in use by the Regulars. _U.S. Military

Magazine_ illustrates such plates for the Richmond Light Infantry

Blues, the Georgia Hussars, the Macon Volunteers, the Jackson Rifle

Corps of Lancaster, Pa., the Montgomery Light Guard, and the Harrison

Guards of Allentown, Pa. The plate of the Harrison Guards is an

example of the license sometimes practiced by Huddy and Duval in the

preparation of their military prints. The color bearer in this print

is depicted wearing a full sunburst plate, while the description of

the uniform called for "a semi-circular plate or _gloria_."[104]

[Footnote 104: _U.S. Military Magazine_ (March 1839), p. 4.]

In the following descriptions of plates, the term "stock pattern" is

used because the insignia are known to have been worn by more than one

organization, because their basic designs are so elementary that it

appears obvious that they were made for wide distribution, or because

they are known to have been made both in silver and in gilt metals.

American Military Insignia, 1800-1851 · 第 112 / 281 题