CHAPTER I.

LES MISÉRABLES.

BY

VICTOR HUGO.

PART FIFTH.

JEAN VALJEAN.

AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION BY LAWRENCE WRAXALL.

BOSTON:

LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY.

1887

[Illustration: The Death of Jean Valjean]

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

JEAN VALJEAN.

BOOK I.

THE WAR WITHIN FOUR WALLS.

I. THE CHARYBDIS OF THE FAUBOURG ST. ANTOINE AND

THE SCYLLA OF THE FAUBOURG DU TEMPLE

II. NOTHING TO DO IN THE ABYSS BUT TALK.

III. CLEARING AND CLOUDING

IV. FIVE LESS AND ONE MORE

V. THE HORIZON ONE SEES FROM THE BARRICADE'S SUMMIT

VI. MARIUS HAGGARD, JAVERT LACONIC

VII. THE SITUATION BECOMES AGGRAVATED

VIII. THE ARTILLERY SETS TO WORK IN EARNEST

IX. EMPLOYMENT OF THE POACHER'S OLD SKILL

AND HIS UNERRING SHOT, WHICH HAD AN

INFLUENCE ON THE CONDEMNATION IN 1796

X. DAWN

XI. THE SHOT WHICH DOES NOT MISS AND WHICH KILLS NOBODY

XII. DISORDER THE PARTISAN OF ORDER

XIII. GLEAMS WHICH FADE

XIV. IN WHICH WE READ THE NAME OF THE MISTRESS OF ENJOLRAS

XV. GAVROCHE OUTSIDE

XVI. HOW A BROTHER BECOMES A FATHER

XVII. MORTUUS PATER FILIUM MORITURUM EXPECTAT

XVIII. THE VULTURE BECOMES PREY

XIX. JEAN VALJEAN REVENGES HIMSELF

XX. THE DEAD ARE RIGHT AND THE LIVING ARE NOT WRONG

XXI. THE HEROES

XXII. STEP BY STEP

XXIII. ORESTES SOBER AND PYLADES DRUNK

XXIV. PRISONER!

BOOK II.

THE INTESTINE OF LEVIATHAN.

I. THE EARTH IMPOVERISHED BY THE SEA

II. THE OLD HISTORY OF THE SEWER

III. BRUNESEAU

IV. CONCEALED DETAILS

V. PRESENT PROGRESS

VI. FUTURE PROGRESS

BOOK III.

MUD, BUT SOUL.

I. THE CLOACA AND ITS SURPRISES

II. EXPLANATION

III. THE TRACKED MAN

IV. HE TOO BEARS HIS CROSS

V. SAND, LIKE WOMAN, HAS A FINENESS THAT IS PERFIDIOUS

VI. THE FONTIS

VII. SOMETIMES ONE IS STRANDED WHERE HE THINKS TO LAND

VIII. THE TOM COAT-SKIRT

IX. MARIUS APPEARS DEAD TO A CONNOISSEUR

X. RETURN OF THE SON PRODIGAL OF HIS LIFE

XI. A SHAKING IN THE ABSOLUTE

XII. THE GRANDFATHER

BOOK IV.

JAVERT DERAILED

BOOK V.

GRANDSON AND GRANDFATHER.

I. WHERE WE AGAIN MEET THE TREE WITH THE ZINC PATCH

II. MARIUS, LEAVING CIVIL WAR, PREPARES FOR A DOMESTIC WAR

III. MARIUS ATTACKS

IV. MLLE. GILLENORMAND HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE MATCH

V. DEPOSIT YOUR MONEY IN A FOREST RATHER THAN WITH A NOTARY

VI. THE TWO OLD MEN, EACH IN HIS FASHION,

DO EVERYTHING FOR COSETTE'S HAPPINESS

VII. THE EFFECTS OF DREAMING BLENDED WITH HAPPINESS

VIII. TWO MEN IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND

BOOK VI.

THE SLEEPLESS NIGHT.

I. FEBRUARY 16, 1833

II. JEAN VALJEAN STILL HAS HIS ARM IN A SLING

III. THE INSEPARABLE

IV. IMMORTALE JECUR

BOOK VII.

THE LAST DROP IN THE BITTER CUP.

I. THE SEVENTH CIRCLE AND THE EIGHTH HEAVEN

II. THE OBSCURITY WHICH A REVELATION MAY CONTAIN

BOOK VIII.

TWILIGHT DECLINES.

I. THE GROUND-FLOOR ROOM

II. OTHER BACKWARD STEPS

III. THEY REMEMBER THE GARDEN IN THE RUE PLUMET

IV. ATTRACTION AND EXTINCTION

BOOK IX.

SUPREME DARKNESS, SUPREME DAWN.

I. PITY THE UNHAPPY, BUT BE INDULGENT TO THE HAPPY

II. THE LAST FLUTTERINGS OF THE LAMP WITHOUT OIL

III. A PEN IS TOO HEAVY FOR THE MAN WHO

LIFTED FAUCHELEVENT'S CART

IV. A BOTTLE OF INK WHICH ONLY WHITENS

V. A NIGHT BEHIND WHICH IS DAY

VI. THE GRASS HIDES, AND THE RAIN EFFACES

ILLUSTRATIONS.

THE DEATH OF JEAN VALJEAN Vol. V. Frontispiece

Drawn by G. Jeanniot.

THE DEATH OF GAVROCHE

Drawn by G. Jeanniot.

JEAN VALJEAN.

BOOK I.

THE WAR WITHIN FOUR WALLS.

CHAPTER I.

THE CHARYBDIS OF THE FAUBOURG ST. ANTOINE AND THE SCYLLA OF THE

FAUBOURG DU TEMPLE.

The two most memorable barricades which the observer of social diseases

can mention do not belong to the period in which the action of this

book is laid. These two barricades, both symbols under different

aspects of a formidable situation, emerged from the earth during the

fatal insurrection of June, 1848, the greatest street-war which history

has seen. It happens sometimes that the canaille, that great despairing

crowd, contrary to principles, even contrary to liberty, equality, and

fraternity, even contrary to the universal vote, the government of all

by all, protests, in the depths of its agony, its discouragement, its

destitution, its fevers, its distresses, its miasmas, its ignorance,

and its darkness, and the populace offers battle to the people. The

beggars attack the common right, the ochlocracy rises in insurrection

against the demos. Those are mournful days; for there is always a

certain amount of right even in this mania, there is suicide in this

duel, and these words, intended to be insults, such as beggars,

canaille, ochlocracy, and populace, prove, alas! rather the fault

of those who reign than the fault of those who suffer; rather the

fault of the privileged than the fault of the disinherited. For our

part, we never pronounce these words without grief and respect, for

when philosophy probes the facts with which they correspond it often

finds much grandeur by the side of misery. Athens was an ochlocracy;

the beggars produced Holland; the populace more than once saved

Rome; and the canaille followed the Saviour. There is no thinker who

has not at times contemplated the magnificence below. Saint Jerome

doubtless thought of this canaille, of all these poor people, all these

vagabonds, and all the wretches whence the apostles and martyrs issued,

when he uttered the mysterious words,--"Fex urbis, lux orbis."

The exasperations of this mob, which suffers and which bleeds, its

unwilling violence against the principles which are its life, its

assaults upon the right, are popular coups d'état, and must be

repressed. The just man devotes himself, and through love for this

very mob, combats it. But how excusable he finds it while resisting

it; how he venerates it, even while opposing it! It is one of those

rare moments in which a man while doing his duty feels something that

disconcerts him, and almost dissuades him from going further; he

persists, and must do so, but the satisfied conscience is sad, and

the accomplishment of the duty is complicated by a contraction of the

heart. June, 1848, was, let us hasten to say, a separate fact, and

almost impossible to classify in the philosophy of history. All the

words we have uttered must be laid aside when we have to deal with

this extraordinary riot, in which the holy anxiety of labor claiming

its right was felt. It must be combated, and it was a duty to do so,

for it attacked the Republic; but, in reality, what was June, 1848?

A revolt of the people against itself. When the subject is not left

out of sight there is no digression, and hence we may be permitted to

concentrate the reader's attention momentarily upon the two absolutely

unique barricades to which we have alluded, and which characterized

this insurrection. The one blocked up the entrance to the Faubourg St.

Antoine, the other defended the approaches to the Faubourg du Temple;

those before whom these two frightful masterpieces of civil war were

raised in the dazzling June sun will never forget them.

The St. Antoine barricade was monstrous; it was three stories high and

seven hundred feet in width. It barred from one corner to the other the

vast mouth of the faubourg, that is to say, three streets; ravined,

slashed, serrated, surmounted by an immense jagged line, supported

by masses which were themselves bastions, pushing out capes here and

there, and powerfully reinforced by the two great promontories of the

houses of the faubourg, it rose like a Cyclopean wall at the back of

the formidable square which had seen July 14. There were nineteen

barricades erected in the streets behind the mother barricade; but, on

seeing it, you felt in the faubourg the immense agonizing suffering

which had reached that extreme stage in which misery desires to come

to a catastrophe. Of what was this barricade made? Of the tumbling in

of three six-storied houses demolished on purpose, say some; of the

prodigy of all the passions, say others. It possessed the lamentable

aspect of all the buildings of hatred, ruin. You might ask who

built this, and you might also ask who destroyed this. It was the

improvisation of the ebullition. Here with that door, that grating,

that awning, that chimney, that broken stove, that cracked stewpan!

Give us anything! Throw everything in! Push, roll, pick, dismantle,

overthrow, and pull down everything! It was a collaboration of the

pavement-stones, beams, iron bars, planks, broken windows, unseated

chairs, cabbage-stalks, rags, tatters, and curses. It was great and it

was little; it was the abyss parodied on the square by the hurly-burly.

It was the mass side by side with the atom, a pulled-down wall and a

broken pipkin, a menacing fraternization of all fragments, into which

Sisyphus had cast his rock and Job his potsherds. Altogether it was

terrible,--it was the acropolis of the barefooted. Overturned carts

studded the slope; an immense wagon spread out across it, with its

wheels to the sky, and looked like a scar on this tumultuous façade; an

omnibus gayly hoisted by strength of arm to the very top of the pile,

as if the architects of this savage edifice had wished to add mockery

to the horror, offered its bare pole to the horses of the air. This

gigantic mound, the alluvium of the riot, represented to the mind an

Ossa upon Pelion of all revolutions,--'93 upon '89, the 9th Thermidor

upon the 10th August, the 18th Brumaire upon January 21st, Vendémiaire

upon Prairial, 1848 upon 1830. The place was worth the trouble, and

this barricade was worthy of appearing upon the very spot whence the

Bastille had disappeared. If the ocean made dykes it would build them

in this way, and the fury of the tide was stamped on this shapeless

encumbrance. What tide? The multitude. You fancied that you saw a

petrified riot, and heard the enormous dark bees of violent progress

humming about this barricade as if they had their hive there. Was it a

thicket? Was it a Bacchanalian feast? Was it a fortress? Vertigo seemed

to have built it with the flapping of its wings! There was a sewer in

this redoubt, and something Olympian in this mass. You saw there in a

confused heap, full of desperation, gables of roofs, pieces of garrets

with their painted paper, window-frames with all their panes planted

in the rubbish and awaiting the cannon, pulled-down mantelpieces,

chests of drawers, tables, benches, a howling topsy-turvy, and those

thousand wretched things cast away even by a beggar which contain at

once fury and nothingness. It may be said that it was the rags of a

people, rags of wood, of iron, of bronze, of stone; that the Faubourg

St. Antoine had swept them to their door with a gigantic broom, and

made a barricade of their misery. Logs resembling executioners' blocks,

disjointed chains, anvil-frames of the shape of gallows, horizontal

wheels emerging from the heap, produced on this edifice of anarchy the

representation of the old punishment suffered by the people. The St.

Antoine barricade made a weapon of everything. All that civil war can

throw at the head of society came from it; it was not a fight but a

paroxysm: the muskets which defended this redoubt, among which were

several blunderbusses, discharged stones, bones, coat-buttons, and even

the casters of night-commodes, very dangerous owing to the copper.

This barricade was furious; it hurled an indescribable clamor into the

clouds; at certain moments when challenging the army it was covered

with a crowd and a tempest; it had a prickly crest of guns, sabres,

sticks, axes, pikes, and bayonets; a mighty red flag fluttered upon

it in the breeze, and the cries of command, the songs of attack, the

rolling of the drum, the sobs of women, and the sardonic laughter of

men dying of starvation could be heard there. It was immeasurable and

living, and a flash of lightning issued from it as from the back of an

electric animal. The spirit of revolution covered with its cloud this

summit, where that voice of the people which resembles the voice of God

was growling, and a strange majesty was disengaged from this Titanic

mass of stones. It was a dungheap, and it was Sinai.

As we said above, it attacked in the name of the revolution--what?

The revolution. It, this barricade, an accident, a disorder, a

misunderstanding, an unknown thing, had, facing it, the constituent

assembly, the sovereignty of the people, universal suffrage,

the nation, the republic: and it was the Carmagnole defying the

Marseillaise. A mad defiance, but heroic, for this old faubourg is a

hero. The faubourg and its redoubt supported each other; the faubourg

rested on the redoubt, and the redoubt backed against the faubourg.

The vast barricade was like a cliff against which the strategy of the

African generals was broken. Its caverns, its excrescences, its warts,

its humps, made grimaces, if we may employ the expression, and grinned

behind the smoke. The grape-shot vanished in the shapeless heap; shells

buried themselves in it and were swallowed up; cannon-balls only

succeeded in forming holes, for of what use is it bombarding chaos? And

the regiments, accustomed to the sternest visions of war, gazed with

anxious eye at this species of wild-beast redoubt, which was a boar

through its bristling and a mountain through its enormity.

A quarter of a league farther on, at the corner of the Rue du Temple,

which debouches on the boulevard near the Chateau d'Eau, if you boldly

advanced your head beyond the point formed by the projection of the

magazine Dallemagne, you could see in the distance across the canal,

and at the highest point of the ascent to Belleville, a strange wall

rising to the second floor and forming a sort of connecting link

between the houses on the right and those on the left, as if the

street had folded back its highest wall in order to close itself up.

This was built of paving-stones; it was tall, straight, correct, cold,

perpendicular, and levelled with the plumb-line and the square; of

course there was no cement, but, as in some Roman walls, this in no

way disturbed its rigid architecture. From its height, its thickness

could be guessed, for the entablature was mathematically parallel

to the basement At regular distances almost invisible loopholes,

resembling black threads, could be distinguished in the gray wall,

separated from each other by equal intervals. This street was deserted

throughout its length, and all the windows and doors were closed. In

the background rose this bar, which converted the street into a blind

alley; it was a motionless and tranquil wall; no one was seen, nothing

was heard, not a cry, nor a sound, nor a breath. It was a sepulchre.

The dazzling June sun inundated this terrible thing with light,--it

was the barricade of the Faubourg du Temple. So soon as you reached

the ground and perceived it, it was impossible even for the boldest

not to become pensive in the presence of this mysterious apparition.

It was adjusted, clamped, imbricated, rectilinear, symmetrical, and

funereal; science and darkness were there. You felt that the chief of

this barricade was a geometrician or a spectre, and as you gazed you

spoke in a whisper. From time to time if any one--private, officer,

or representative of the people--ventured to cross the solitary road,

a shrill faint whistling was heard, and the passer-by fell wounded or

dead; or, if he escaped, a bullet could be seen to bury itself in some

shutter, or the stucco of the wall. Sometimes it was a grape-shot,

for the man of the barricade had made out of gas-pipes, stopped up

at one end with tow and clay, two small cannon. There was no useless

expenditure of gunpowder, and nearly every shot told. There were a

few corpses here and there, and patches of blood on the pavement. I

remember a white butterfly that fluttered up and down the street;

summer does not abdicate. All the gateways in the vicinity were crowded

with corpses, and you felt in this street that you were covered by

some one you could not see, and that the whole street was under the

marksman's aim.

The soldiers of the attacking column, massed behind the species of

ridge which the canal bridge forms at the entrance of the Faubourg du

Temple, watched gravely and thoughtfully this mournful redoubt, this

immobility, this impassiveness, from which death issued. Some crawled

on their stomachs to the top of the pitch of the bridge, while careful

not to let their shakos pass beyond it. Brave Colonel Monteynard

admired this barricade with a tremor. "How it is built," he said to a

representative; "not a single paving-stone projects beyond the other.

It is made of porcelain." At this moment a bullet smashed the cross

on his chest and he fell. "The cowards!" the troops shouted, "Why do

they not show themselves? They dare not! They hide!" The barricade of

the Faubourg du Temple, defended by eighty men and attacked by ten

thousand, held out for three days, and on the fourth day the troops

acted as they had done at Zaatcha and Constantine,--they broke through

houses, passed along roofs, and the barricade was taken. Not one of the

eighty cowards dreamed of flying; all were killed with the exception of

Barthélemy, the chief, to whom we shall allude directly. The barricade

of St. Antoine was the tumult of the thunder; the barricade of the

Temple was the silence. There was between the two barricades the same

difference as exists between the formidable and the sinister. The one

seemed a throat, the other a mask. Admitting that the gigantic and dark

insurrection of June was composed of a fury and an enigma, the dragon

was seen in the first barricade and the sphinx behind the second.

These two fortresses were built by two men, Cournet and Barthélemy:

Cournet made the St. Antoine barricade, Barthélemy the Temple

barricade, and each of them was the image of the man who built it.

Cournet was a man of tall stature; he had wide shoulders, a red face, a

smashing fist, a brave heart, a loyal soul, a sincere and terrible eye.

He was intrepid, energetic, irascible, and stormy; the most cordial

of men, and the most formidable of combatants. War, contest, medley

were the air he breathed, and put him in good temper. He had been an

officer in the navy, and from his gestures and his voice it could be

divined that he issued from the ocean and came from the tempest; he

continued the hurricane in battle. Omitting the genius, there was in

Cournet something of Danton, as, omitting the divinity, there was

in Danton something of Hercules. Barthélemy, thin, weak, pale, and

taciturn, was a species of tragical gamin, who, having been struck by

a policeman, watched for him, waited for him, and killed him, and at

the age of seventeen was sent to the galleys. He came out and built

this barricade. At a later date, when both were exiles in London,

Barthélemy killed Cournet: it was a melancholy duel. Some time after

that, Barthélemy, caught in the cog-wheels of one of those mysterious

adventures in which passion is mingled, catastrophes in which French

justice sees extenuating circumstances and English justice only sees

death, was hanged. The gloomy social edifice is so built that, owing to

maternal denudation and moral darkness, this wretched being, who had

had an intellect, certainly firm and possibly great, began with the

galleys in France and ended with the gibbet in England. Barthélemy only

hoisted one flag,--it was the black one.

Les Misérables, v. 5/5: Jean Valjean · 第 1 / 27 章