RELATIONS OF TREES TO THE ATMOSPHERE.

I have not much faith in the science of ignorant men; for the

foundations of all knowledge are laid in books; and those only who have

read and studied much can possess any considerable store of wisdom. But

there are philosophers among laboring swains, whose quaint observations

and solutions of nature’s problems are sometimes worthy of record. With

these men of untutored genius I have had considerable intercourse, and

hence I oftener quote them than the learned and distinguished, whom I

have rarely met. The ignorant, from want of knowledge, are always

theorists; but genius affords its possessor, how small soever his

acquisitions, some glimpses of truth which may be entirely hidden from

the mere pedant in science. My philosophic friend, a man of genius born

to the plough, entertained a theory in regard to the atmosphere, which,

though not strictly philosophical, is so ingenious and suggestive that I

have thought an account of it a good introduction to this essay.

My friend, when explaining his views, alluded to the well-known fact

that plants growing in an aquarium keep the water supplied with

atmospheric air—not with simple oxygen, but with oxygen chemically

combined with nitrogen—by some vital process that takes place in the

leaves of plants. As the lungs of animals decompose the air which they

inspire, and breathe out carbonic-acid gas, plants in their turn

decompose this deleterious gas, and breathe out pure atmospheric air.

His theory is that the atmosphere is entirely the product of vegetation,

and that nature has no other means of composing it; that it is not

simply a chemical, but a vital product; and that its production, like

its preservation, depends entirely on plants, and would be impossible

without their agency. But as all plants united are not equal in bulk to

the trees, it may be truly averred that any series of operations or

accidents that should deprive the earth entirely of its forests would

leave the atmosphere without a source for its regeneration.

The use of the foliage of trees in renovating the atmosphere is not, I

believe, denied by any man of science. This theory has been proved to be

true by experiments in vital chemistry. The same chemical appropriation

of gases and transpiration of oxygen is performed by all classes of

vegetables; but any work in the economy of nature assigned to vegetation

is the most effectually accomplished by trees. The property of foliage

that requires carbonic-acid gas for its breathing purposes, and causes

it to give out oxygen, is of vital importance; and it is hardly to be

doubted that a close room well lighted by the sun would sustain its

healthful atmosphere a longer time, if it were filled with plants in

leaf, but not in flower, and occupied by breathing animals, than if the

animals occupied it without the plants.

But there is another function performed by the foliage of trees and

herbs in which no chemical process is involved,—that of exhaling

moisture into the atmosphere after it has been absorbed by the roots.

Hence the humidity of this element is greatly dependent on foliage. A

few simple experiments will show how much more rapidly and abundantly

this evaporation takes place when the soil is covered with growing

plants than when the surface is bare. Take two teacups of equal size and

fill them with water. Place them on a table, and insert into one of them

cuttings of growing plants with their leaves, and let the other stand

with water only. In a few hours the water will disappear from the cup

containing the plants, while that in the other cup will not be sensibly

diminished. Indeed, there is reason to believe that gallons of water

might be evaporated into the air by keeping the cup containing the

cuttings always full, before the single gill contained in the other cup

would disappear. If a few cuttings will evaporate a half-pint of water

in twelve hours, we can imagine the vast quantity constantly exhaled

into the atmosphere by a single tree. The largest steam-boiler in use,

kept constantly boiling, would not probably evaporate more water than

one large elm in the same time.

We may judge, from our experiment with the cuttings, that a vastly

greater proportion of moisture would be exhaled into the atmosphere from

any given surface of ground when covered with vegetation, than from the

same amount of uncovered surface, or even of standing water. Plants are

indeed the most important existing agents of nature for conveying the

moisture of the earth into the air. The quantity of transpiring foliage

from a dense assemblage of trees must be immense. The evaporation of

water from the vast ocean itself is probably small compared with that

from the land which it surrounds. And there is reason to believe that

the water evaporated from the ocean would not produce rain enough to

sustain vegetation, if by any accident every continent and island were

deprived of its trees. The whole earth would soon become a desert. I

would remark, in this place, that trees are the agents by which the

superfluous waters of the ocean, as they are supplied by rivers emptying

into it, are restored to the atmosphere and thence again to the surface

of the earth. Trees pump up from great depths the waters as they ooze

into the soil from millions of subterranean ducts ramifying in all

directions from the bed of the ocean.

[Illustration: LEAF OF HOLLY.]

A year among the trees · 第 51 / 159 题