II.--ST. DECLAN.

"If thou hast the right, O Erin,

to a champion of battle to aid thee

thou hast the head of a hundred

thousand, Declan of Ardmore."

(Martyrology of Oengus).

Five miles or less to the east of Youghal Harbour, on the southern

Irish coast, a short, rocky and rather elevated promontory juts, with a

south-easterly trend, into the ocean. Maps and admiralty charts call it

Ram Head, but the real name is Ceann-a-Rama and popularly it is often

styled Ardmore Head. The material of this inhospitable coast is a hard

metamorphic schist which bids defiance to time and weather. Landwards

the shore curves in clay cliffs to the north-east, leaving, between it

and the iron headland beyond, a shallow exposed bay wherein many a proud

ship has met her doom. Nestling at the north side of the headland and

sheltered by the latter from Atlantic storms stands one of the most

remarkable groups of ancient ecclesiastical remains in Ireland--all that

has survived of St. Declan's holy city of Ardmore. This embraces a

beautiful and perfect round tower, a singularly interesting ruined church

commonly called the cathedral, the ruins of a second church beside a holy

well, a primitive oratory, a couple of ogham inscribed pillar stones,

&c., &c.

No Irish saint perhaps has so strong a local hold as Declan or has left

so abiding a popular memory. Nevertheless his period is one of the great

disputed questions of early Irish history. According to the express

testimony of his Life, corroborated by testimony of the Lives of SS.

Ailbhe and Ciaran, he preceded St. Patrick in the Irish mission and was a

co-temporary of the national apostle. Objection, exception or opposition

to the theory of Declan's early period is based less on any inherent

improbability in the theory itself than on contradictions and

inconsistencies in the Life. Beyond any doubt the Life does actually

contradict itself; it makes Declan a cotemporary of Patrick in the fifth

century and a cotemporary likewise of St. David a century later. In any

attempted solution of the difficulty involved it may be helpful to

remember a special motive likely to animate a tribal histrographer,

scil.:--the family relationship, if we may so call it, of the two saints;

David was bishop of the Deisi colony in Wales as Declan was bishop of

their kinsmen of southern Ireland. It was very probably part of the

writer's purpose to call attention to the links of kindred which bound

the separated Deisi; witness his allusion later to the alleged visit of

Declan to his kinsmen of Bregia. Possibly there were several Declans, as

there were scores of Colmans, Finians, &c., and hence perhaps the

confusion and some of the apparent inconsistencies. There was certainly

a second Declan, a disciple of St. Virgilius, to whom the latter

committed care of a church in Austria where he died towards close of

eighth century. Again we find mention of a St. Declan who was a foster

son of Mogue of Ferns, and so on. It is too much, as Delehaye ("Legendes

Hagiographiques") remarks, to expect the populace to distinguish between

namesakes. Great men are so rare! Is it likely there should have lived

two saints of the same name in the same country!

The latest commentators on the question of St. Declan's period--and they

happen to be amongst the most weighty--argue strongly in favour of the

pre-Patrician mission (Cfr. Prof. Kuno Meyer, "Learning Ireland in the

Fifth Century"). Discussing the way in which letters first reached our

distant island of the west and the causes which led to the proficiency of

sixth-century Ireland in classical learning Zimmer and Meyer contend that

the seeds of that literary culture, which flourished in Ireland of the

sixth century, had been sown therein in the first and second decades of

the preceding century by Gaulish scholars who had fled from their own

country owing to invasion of the latter by Goths and other barbarians.

The fact that these scholars, who were mostly Christians, sought asylum

in Ireland indicates that Christianity had already penetrated thither, or

at any rate that it was known and tolerated there. Dr. Meyer answers the

objection that if so large and so important an invasion of scholars took

place we ought have some reference to the fact in the Irish annals. The

annals, he replies, are of local origin and they rarely refer in their

oldest parts to national events: moreover they are very meagre in their

information about the fifth century. One Irish reference to the Gaulish

scholars is, however, adduced in corroboration; it occurs in that well

known passage in St. Patrick's "Confessio" where the saint cries out

against certain "rhetoricians" in Ireland who were hostile to him and

pagan,--"You rhetoricians who do not know the Lord, hear and search Who

it was that called me up, fool though I be, from the midst of those who

think themselves wise and skilled in the law and mighty orators and

powerful in everything." Who were these "rhetorici" that have made this

passage so difficult for commentators and have caused so various

constructions to be put upon it? It is clear, the professor maintains,

that the reference is to pagan rhetors from Gaul whose arrogant

presumption, founded on their learning, made them regard with disdain the

comparatively illiterate apostle of the Scots. Everyone is familiar with

the classic passage of Tacitus wherein he alludes to the harbours of

Ireland as being more familiar to continental mariners than those of

Britain. We have references moreover to refugee Christians who fled to

Ireland from the persecutions of Diocletian more than a century before

St. Patrick's day; in addition it is abundantly evident that many

Irishmen--Christians like Celestius the lieutenant of Pelagius, and

possibly Pelagius himself, amongst them--had risen to distinction or

notoriety abroad before middle of the fifth century.

Possibly the best way to present the question of Declan's age is to put

in tabulated form the arguments of the pre-Patrician advocates against

the counter contentions of those who claim that Declan's period is later

than Patrick's:--

For the Pre-Patrician Mission.

I.--Positive statement of Life, corroborated by Lives of SS. Ciaran and

Ailbhe.

II.--Patrick's apparent avoidance of the Principality of Decies.

III.--The peculiar Declan cult and the strong local hold which Declan has

maintained.

Against Theory of Early Fifth Century period.

I.--Contradictions, anachronisms, &c., of Life.

II.--Lack of allusion to Declan in the Lives of St. Patrick.

III.--Prosper's testimony to the mission of Palladius as first bishop to

the believing Scots.

IV.--Alleged motives for later invention of Pre-Patrician story.

In this matter and at this hour it is hardly worth appealing to the

authority of Lanigan and the scholars of the past. Much evidence not

available in Lanigan's day is now at the service of scholars. We are to

look rather at the reasoning of Colgan, Ussher, and Lanigan than to the

mere weight of their names.

Referring in order to our tabulated grounds of argument, pro and con, and

taking the pro arguments first, we may (I.) discard as evidence for our

purpose the Life of St. Ibar which is very fragmentary and otherwise a

rather unsatisfactory document. The Lives of Ailbhe, Ciaran, and Declan

are however mutually corroborative and consistent. The Roman visit and

the alleged tutelage under Hilarius are probably embellishments; they

look like inventions to explain something and they may contain more than

a kernel of truth. At any rate they are matters requiring further

investigation and elucidation. In this connection it may be useful to

recall that the Life (Latin) of St. Ciaran has been attributed by Colgan

to Evinus the disciple and panegyrist of St. Patrick.

Patrick's apparent neglect of the Decies (II.) may have no special

significance. At best it is but negative evidence: taken, however, in

connection with (I.) and its consectaria it is suggestive. We can

hardly help speculating why the apostle--passing as it were by its front

door--should have given the go-bye to a region so important as the

Munster Decies. Perhaps he sent preachers into it; perhaps there was no

special necessity for a formal mission, as the faith had already found

entrance. It is a little noteworthy too that we do not find St.

Patrick's name surviving in any ecclesiastical connection with the

Decies, if we except Patrick's Well, near Clonmel, and this Well is

within a mile or so of the territorial frontier. Moreover the southern

portion of the present Tipperary County had been ceded by Aengus to the

Deisi, only just previous to Patrick's advent, and had hardly yet had

sufficient time to become absorbed. The whole story of Declan's alleged

relations with Patrick undoubtedly suggests some irregularity in Declan's

mission--an irregularity which was capable of rectification through

Patrick and which de facto was finally so rectified.

(III.) No one in Eastern Munster requires to be told how strong is the

cult of St. Declan throughout Decies and the adjacent territory. It is

hardly too much to say that the Declan tradition in Waterford and Cork is

a spiritual actuality, extraordinary and unique, even in a land which

till recently paid special popular honour to its local saints. In

traditional popular regard Declan in the Decies has ever stood first,

foremost, and pioneer. Carthage, founder of the tribal see, has held and

holds in the imagination of the people only a secondary place. Declan,

whencesoever or whenever he came, is regarded as the spiritual father to

whom the Deisi owe the gift of faith. How far this tradition and the

implied belief in Declan's priority and independent mission are derived

from circulation of the "Life" throughout Munster in the last few

centuries it is difficult to gauge, but the tradition seems to have

flourished as vigorously in the days of Colgan as it does to-day.

Declan's "pattern" at Ardmore continues to be still the most noted

celebration of its kind in Ireland. A few years ago it was participated

in by as many as fourteen thousand people from all parts of Waterford,

Cork, and Tipperary. The scenes and ceremonies have been so frequently

described that it is not necessary to recount them here--suffice it to

say that the devotional practices and, in fact, the whole celebration is

of a purely popular character receiving no approbation, and but bare

toleration, from church or clergy. Even to the present day Declan's name

is borne as their praenomen by hundreds of Waterford men, and, before

introduction of the modern practice of christening with foolish foreign

names, its use was far more common, as the ancient baptismal registers of

Ardmore, Old Parish, and Clashmore attest. On the other hand Declan's

name is associated with comparatively few places in the Decies. Of these

the best known is Relig Deaglain, a disused graveyard and early church

site on the townland of Drumroe, near Cappoquin. There was also an

ancient church called Killdeglain, near Stradbally.

Against the theory of the pre-Patrician or citra-Patrician mission we

have first the objection, which really has no weight, and which we shall

not stop to discuss, that it is impossible for Christianity at that early

date to have found its way to this distant island, beyond the boundary of

the world. An argument on a different plane is (I.), the undoubtedly

contradictory and inconsistent character of the Life. It is easy however

to exaggerate the importance of this point. Modern critical methods were

undreamed of in the days of our hagiographer, who wrote, moreover, for

edification only in a credulous age. Most of the historical documents of

the period are in a greater or less degree uncritical but that does not

discredit their testimony however much it may confuse their editors. It

can be urged moreover that two mutually incompatible genealogies of the

saint are given. The genealogy given by MacFirbisigh seems in fact to

disagree in almost every possible detail with the genealogy in 23 M. 50

R.I.A. That however is like an argument that Declan never existed. It

really suggests and almost postulates the existence of a second Declan

whose Acts and those of our Declan have become mutually confused.

(II.) Absence of Declan's name from the Acts of Patrick is a negative

argument. It is explicable perhaps by the supposed irregularity of

Declan's preaching. Declan was certainly earlier than Mochuda and yet

there is no reference to him in the Life of the latter saint. Ailbhe

however is referred to in the Tripartite Life of Patrick and the cases of

Ailbhe and Declan are "a pari"; the two saints stand or fall together.

(IV.) Motives for invention of the pre-Patrician myth are alleged,

scil.:--to rebut certain claims to jurisdiction, tribute or visitation

advanced by Armagh in after ages. It is hard to see however how

resistance to the claims in question could be better justified on the

theory of a pre-Patrician Declan, who admittedly acknowledged Patrick's

supremacy, than on the admission of a post-Patrician mission.

That in Declan we have to deal with a very early Christian teacher of the

Decies there can be no doubt. If not anterior to Patrick he must have

been the latter's cotemporary. Declan however had failed to convert the

chieftain of his race and for this--reading between the lines of the

"Life"--we seem to hear Patrick blaming him.

The monuments proper of Declan remaining at Ardmore are (a) his oratory

near the Cathedral and Round Tower in the graveyard, (b) his stone on the

beach, (c) his well on the cliff, and (d) another stone said to have been

found in his tomb and preserved at Ardmore for long ages with great

reveration. The "Life" refers moreover to the saint's pastoral staff and

his bell but these have disappeared for centuries.

The "Oratory" is simply a primitive church of the usual sixth century

type: it stands 13' 4" x 8' 9" in the clear, and has, or had, the usual

high-pitched gables and square-headed west doorway with inclining jambs.

Another characteristic feature of the early oratory is seen in the

curious antae or prolongation of the side walls. Locally the little

building is known as the "beannacan," in allusion, most likely, to its

high gables or the finials which once, no doubt, in Irish fashion,

adorned its roof. Though somewhat later than Declan's time this

primitive building is very intimately connected with the Saint.

Popularly it is supposed to be his grave and within it is a hollow space

scooped out, wherein it is said his ashes once reposed. It is highly

probable that tradition is quite correct as to the saint's grave, over

which the little church was erected in the century following Declan's

death. The oratory was furnished with a roof of slate by Bishop Mills in

1716.

"St. Declan's Stone" is a glacial boulder of very hard conglomerate which

lies on a rocky ledge of beach beneath the village of Ardmore. It

measures some 8' 6" x 4' 6" x 4' 0" and reposes upon two slightly jutting

points of the underlying metamorphic rock. Wonderful virtues are

attributed to St. Declan's Stone, which, on the occasion of the patronal

feast, is visited by hundreds of devotees who, to participate in its

healing efficacy and beneficence, crawl laboriously on face and hands

through the narrow space between the boulder and the underlying rock.

Near by, at foot of a new storm-wall, are two similar but somewhat

smaller boulders which, like their venerated and more famous neighbour,

were all wrenched originally by a glacier from their home in the Comeragh

Mountains twenty miles away.

"St. Declan's Well," beside some remains of a rather large and apparently

twelfth century church on the cliff, in the townland of Dysert is

diverted into a shallow basin in which pilgrims bathe feet and hands.

Set in some comparatively modern masonry over the well are a carved

crucifixion and other figures of apparently late mediaeval character.

Some malicious interference with this well led, nearly a hundred years

since, to much popular indignation and excitement.

The second "St. Declan's Stone" was a small, cross-inscribed jet-black

piece of slate or marble, approximately--2" or 3" x 1 1/2". Formerly it

seems to have had a small silver cross inset and was in great demand

locally as an amulet for cattle curing. It disappeared however, some

fifty years or so since, but very probably it could still be recovered in

Dungarvan.

Far the most striking of all the monuments at Ardmore is, of course, the

Round Tower which, in an excellent state of preservation, stands with its

conical cap of stone nearly a hundred feet high. Two remarkable, if not

unique, features of the tower are the series of sculptured corbels which

project between the floors on the inside, and the four projecting belts

or zones of masonry which divide the tower into storeys externally. The

tower's architectural anomalies are paralleled by its history which is

correspondingly unique: it stood a regular siege in 1642, when ordnance

was brought to bear on it and it was defended by forty confederates

against the English under Lords Dungarvan and Broghil.

A few yards to north of the Round Tower stands "The Cathedral"

illustrating almost every phase of ecclesiastical architecture which

flourished in Ireland from St. Patrick to the Reformation--Cyclopean,

Celtic-Romanesque, Transitional and Pointed. The chancel arch is

possibly the most remarkable and beautiful illustration of the

Transitional that we have. An extraordinary feature of the church is the

wonderful series of Celtic arcades and panels filled with archaic

sculptures in relief which occupy the whole external face of the west

gable.

St. Declan's foundation at Ardmore seems (teste Moran's Archdall) to have

been one of the Irish religious houses which accepted the reform of Pope

Innocent at the Lateran Council and to have transformed itself into a

Regular Canonry. It would however be possible to hold, on the evidence,

that it degenerated into a mere parochial church. We hear indeed of two

or three episcopal successors of the saint, scil.:--Ultan who immediately

followed him, Eugene who witnessed a charter to the abbey of Cork in

1174, and Moelettrim O Duibhe-rathre who died in 1303 after he had,

according to the annals of Inisfallen, "erected and finished the Church"

of Ardmore. The "Wars of the Gaedhil and Gall" have reference, circa 824

or 825, to plunder by the Northmen of Disert Tipraite which is almost

certainly the church of Dysert by the Holy Well at Ardmore. The same

fleet, on the same expedition, plundered Dunderrow (near Kinsale),

Inisshannon (Bandon River), Lismore, and Kilmolash.

Regarding the age of our "Life" it is difficult with the data at hand to

say anything very definite. While dogmatism however is dangerous

indefiniteness is unsatisfying. True, we cannot trace the genealogy of

the present version beyond middle of the sixteenth century, but its

references to ancient monuments existing at date of its compilation show

it to be many centuries older. Its language proves little or nothing,

for, being a popular work, it would be modernised to date by each

successive scribe. Colgan was of opinion it was a composition of the

eighth century. Ussher and Ware, who had the Life in very ancient

codices, also thought it of great antiquity. Papebrach, the Bollandist,

on the other hand, considered the Life could not be older than the

twelfth century, but this opinion of his seems to have been based on a

misapprehension. In the absence of all diocesan colour or allusion one

feels constrained to assign the production to some period previous to

Rathbreasail. We should not perhaps be far wrong in assigning the first

collection of materials to somewhere in the eighth century or in the

century succeeding. The very vigorous ecclesiastical revival of the

eleventh century, at conclusion of the Danish wars, must have led to some

revision of the country's religious literature. The introduction, a

century and-a-half later, of the great religious orders most probably led

to translation of the Life into Latin and its casting into shape for

reading in refectory or choir.

Only three surviving copies of the Irish Life are known to the writer:

one in the Royal Library at Brussels, the second in the Royal Irish

Academy Collection (M. 23, 50, pp. 109-120), and the third in possession

of Professor Hyde. As the second and third enumerated are copies of one

imperfect exemplar it has not been thought necessary to collate both with

the Brussels MS. which has furnished the text here printed. M. 23, 50

(R.I.A.) has however been so collated and the marginal references

initialled B are to that imperfect copy. The latter, by the way, is in

the handwriting of John Murphy "na Raheenach," and is dated 1740. It has

not been thought necessary to give more than the important variants.

The present text is a reproduction of the Brussels MS. plus lengthening

of contractions. As regards lengthening in question it is to be noted

that the well known contraction for "ea" or "e" has been uniformly

transliterated "e." Otherwise orthography of the MS. has been

scrupulously followed--even where inconsistent or incorrect. For the

division into paragraphs the editor is not responsible; he has merely

followed the division originated, or adopted, by the scribe. The Life

herewith presented was copied in 1629 by Brother Michael O'Clery of the

Four Masters' staff from an older MS. of Eochy O'Heffernan's dated 1582.

The MS. of O'Heffernan is referred to by our scribe as "seinleabar," but

his reference is rather to the contents than to the copy. Apparently

O'Clery did more than transcribe; he re-edited, as was his wont, into the

literary Irish of his day. A page of the Brussels MS., reproduced in

facsimile as a frontispiece to the present volume, will give the student

a good idea of O'Clery's script and style.

Occasional notes on Declan in the martyrologies and elsewhere give some

further information about our saint. Unfortunately however the alleged

facts are not always capable of reconciliation with statements of our

"Life," and again the existence of a second, otherwise unknown, Declan is

suggested. The introduction of rye is attributed to him in the Calendar

of Oengus, as introduction of wheat is credited to St. Finan Camm, and

introduction of bees to St. Modomnoc,--"It was the full of his shoe that

Declan brought, the full of his shoe likewise Finan, but the full of his

bell Modomnoc" (Cal. Oeng., April 7th). More puzzling is the note in the

same Calendar which makes Declan a foster son of Mogue of Ferns! This

entry illustrates the way in which errors originate. A former scribe

inadvertently copied in, after Declan's name, portion of the entry

immediately following which relates to Colman Hua Liathain. Successive

scribes re-copied the error without discovering it and so it became

stereotyped.

Life of St. Declan of Ardmore and Life of St. Mochuda of Lismore · 第 7 / 16 题