CHAPTER XXIV.

ASSEMBLING OF THE THIRD CONGRESS--ITS CHARACTER--RECOMMENDATIONS IN

WASHINGTON'S ANNUAL MESSAGE--HIS SPECIAL MESSAGE CONCERNING

RELATIONS WITH EUROPE--HIS NOTICE OF GENET--OPINIONS OF THE CABINET

CONCERNING THE MESSAGE--WASHINGTON SUPPORTED BY

CONGRESS--JEFFERSON'S REPORT ON COMMERCIAL RELATIONS--HIS PARTING

MISSILE CAST AT GENET--JEFFERSON'S RETIREMENT FROM

OFFICE--WASHINGTON'S CONFIDENCE IN HIM--CORRESPONDENCE--JEFFERSON AT

HOME--MADISON'S RESOLUTIONS BASED ON JEFFERSON'S REPORT.

The third Congress assembled at Philadelphia on the second of December.

In the senate, many of the leading members of former sessions remained,

having their places either by holding over or by re-election. Many of

the old members of the house of representatives had also been re-chosen,

and yet there were a great many changes in that body. The elements of

party strife were active among them all, and it was evident to every man

that a great struggle was impending. The aggressions of the British and

the intrigues of Genet continued to inflame the zeal of the republicans,

and they carried their partiality to France to a degree of absolute

fanaticism. To many minds, open war between England and the United

States appeared inevitable.

Washington's annual message, delivered at the opening of Congress, was

calculated to still the turbulent waves of faction, had reason and

judgment, and not passion and fanaticism, swayed the opinions of men. He

expressed his sense of the continued confidence of the people in

re-electing him to the high office of chief-magistrate of the nation;

and then, in firm, explicit, and dignified terms, spoke of existing

public affairs, especially the measures he had taken, in consequence of

the war in Europe, to preserve peace at home and to protect the rights

and interests of the United States. He pressed upon Congress the

necessity of placing the country in a condition of complete defence, and

of exacting from other governments the fulfilment of their duties toward

his own.

"The United States ought not," he said, "to indulge a persuasion that,

contrary to the order of human events, they will for ever keep at a

distance those painful appeals to arms with which the history of every

other nation abounds. There is a rank due to the United States among

nations which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the

reputation of weakness. If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to

repel it. If we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful

instruments of our rising prosperity, it must be known that we are at

all times ready for war." With such suggestions, he urged them to adopt

measures for increasing the amount of arms and ammunition in the

arsenals, and to improve the militia establishment. He assured them that

every reasonable effort had been made to adjust the causes of dissention

with the Indians north of the Ohio, and yet war with them continued. He

alluded to the political connection of the United States with Europe,

and promised to give them, in a subsequent communication, a statement of

occurrences which related to it, that had passed under the knowledge of

the executive.

The president urged the house of representatives to adopt measures for

the "regular redemption and discharge of the public debt," as a matter

of the first importance; and announced the necessity of an augmentation

of the public revenue to meet all proper demands upon the treasury. He

concluded by saying, "Permit me to bring to your remembrance the

magnitude of your task. Without an unprejudiced coolness, the welfare of

the government may be hazarded; without harmony, as far as consists with

freedom of sentiment, its dignity may be lost. But, as the legislative

proceedings of the United States will never, I trust, be reproached for

the want of temper or of candor, so shall not the public happiness

languish for the want of my strenuous and warmest co-operation."

On the fifth of December, according to promise, Washington laid before

Congress the documents relating, not only to Genet and his mission, but

to negotiations with England and other European governments. In his

message accompanying these documents, after alluding to the general

feeling of friendship for the United States exhibited by the

representative and executive bodies of France, the president spoke as

follows of the insolent Genet:--

"It is with extreme concern I have to inform you, that the proceedings

of the person whom they have unfortunately appointed their minister

plenipotentiary here have breathed nothing of the friendly spirit of the

nation which sent him. Their tendency, on the contrary, has been to

involve us in war abroad, and discord and anarchy at home. So far as his

acts, or those of his agents, have threatened our immediate commitment

in the war, or flagrant insult to the authority of the laws, their

effect has been counteracted by the ordinary cognizance of the laws, and

by an exertion of the powers confided to me. Where their danger was not

imminent, they have been borne with from sentiments of regard to his

nation, from a sense of their friendship toward us, from a conviction

that they would not suffer us to long remain exposed to the action of a

person who has so little respected our mutual dispositions, and from a

reliance on the firmness of my fellow-citizens in their principles of

peace and order." He then alluded to the spoliations which had been

committed upon the commerce of the United States by the cruisers of the

belligerent powers, and the restrictions upon American commerce

attempted to be enforced by the commanders of British vessels pursuant

to instructions of their government. He also called attention to the

inexecution of the treaty of 1783, and the relations of the United

States and Spain.

"The message," says Hildreth, "as originally drafted by Jefferson,

contained a contrast between the conduct of France and England,

especially in relation to commercial facilities, highly favorable to the

former. This had been objected to by Hamilton, who considered the

disposition of the people toward France a serious calamity, and that the

executive ought not, by echoing her praises, to nourish that

disposition. In his opinion, the balance of commercial favors was

decidedly with the British; the commercial offers made by France were

the offspring of the moment, growing out of circumstances that could not

last. To evade Hamilton's objections, Jefferson consented to some

modifications of the message. Hamilton then insisted that the papers

relating to the non-execution of the treaty of peace, and to the

stopping of the corn-ships, ought not to be communicated, unless in a

secret message, as the matters therein discussed were still unsettled,

and the tendency of the communication was to inflame the public mind

against Great Britain. Jefferson was a good deal alarmed at this

threatened suppression of his diplomatic labors; but Washington decided

that all the papers should be communicated without any restrictions of

secrecy, even those respecting the corn-ships, which all the cabinet

except Jefferson had advised to withhold."

In a letter to his wife, written on the nineteenth of December, John

Adams, referring to the sentence in Washington's special message in

relation to the French minister, said, "The president has considered the

conduct of Genet very nearly in the same light with Columbus, and has

given him a bolt of thunder. We shall see how this is supported by both

houses. We shall soon see whether we have any government or not in this

country." Doubting whether Washington would be sustained by Congress,

Adams continued: "But, although he stands at present as high in the

admiration and confidence of the people as ever he did, I expect he will

find many bitter and desperate enemies arise in consequence of his just

judgment against Genet."

In this, Adams was mistaken. The house, where the opposition was most

rampant, determined, and unscrupulous, responded most affectionately to

the president's message, and tacitly rebuked the demagogues for their

personal abuse of Washington. They expressed their satisfaction at his

re-election, and their confidence in the purity and patriotism of his

motives, in all his acts, especially in again consenting, at the call of

his country, to fill the presidential chair. "It is to virtues which

have commanded long and universal reverence, and services from which

have flowed great and lasting benefits, that the tribute of praise may

be paid, without the reproach of flattery; and it is from the same

sources that the fairest anticipations may be derived in favor of the

public happiness."

Both houses, likewise, in the face of the popular excitement in favor of

France, approved of the president's course in regard to that country and

its representative; and while the lower house was guarded in its terms

of approval of the proclamation of neutrality that had been so loudly

condemned by the partisan press, the senate pronounced it "a measure

well-timed and wise, manifesting a watchful solicitude for the welfare

of the nation and calculated to promote it."

Jefferson's official connection with Washington was now drawing to a

close. He had consented to remain in the cabinet until the end of the

current year. With the completion and submission of some able state

papers he finished his career as secretary of state. One of them was an

elaborate report called for by a resolution of Congress adopted in

February, 1791, on the state of trade of the United States with

different countries; the nature and extent of exports and imports, and

the amount of tonnage of American shipping. It also specified the

various restrictions and prohibitions by which American commerce was

embarrassed and greatly injured, and recommended the adoption of

discriminating duties, as against Great Britain, to compel her to put

the United States on a more equal footing, she having thus far

persistently declined to enter into any treaty stipulations on the

subject.

Jefferson's last official act was the administration of a deserved

rebuke to Genet. That meddling functionary had sent to him translations

of the instructions given him by the executive council of France,

desiring the president to lay them officially before both houses of

Congress, and proposing to transmit, from time to time, other papers to

be laid before them in like manner. "I have it in charge to observe,"

said Jefferson to Genet in a letter on the thirty-first of December,

"that your functions as the minister of a foreign nation here are

confined to the transactions of the affairs of your nation with the

executive of the United States; that the communications which are to

pass between the executive and legislative branches can not be a

subject for your interference; and that the president must be left to

judge for himself what matters his duty, or the public good, may require

him to propose to the deliberations of Congress. I have, therefore, the

honor of returning you the copies sent for distribution, and of being,

with great respect, sir, your most obedient and most humble servant."

Even this did not keep Genet quiet.

Throughout all the storm that had agitated his cabinet, and the

hostility of Jefferson and his party to the measures of the

administration, Washington never withheld from the secretary of state

his confidence in his wisdom and patriotism; and the latter left office

with the happy consciousness that he carried with him into retirement

the friendship of one, of whom he said in after years, "His integrity

was most pure, his justice the most inflexible I have ever known; no

motives of interest or consanguinity, of friendship or hatred, being

able to bias his decision. He was indeed, in every sense of the word, a

wise, and good, and great man"[62]

On the last day of the year, Mr. Jefferson offered his resignation in

the following letter to the president: "Having had the honor of

communicating to you, in my letter of the last of July, my purpose of

retiring from the office of secretary of state at the end of the month

of September, you were pleased, for particular reasons, to wish its

postponement to the close of the year. That time being now arrived, and

my propensities to retirement daily more and more irresistible, I now

take the liberty of resigning the office into your hands. Be pleased to

accept with it my sincere thanks for all the indulgences which you have

been so good as to exercise toward me in the discharge of its duties.

Conscious that my need of them have been great, I have still ever found

them greater, without any other claim on my part than a firm pursuit of

what has appeared to me to be right, and a thorough disdain of all means

which were not as open and honorable as their object was pure. I carry

into my retirement a lively sense of your goodness, and shall continue

gratefully to remember it.

"With very sincere prayers for your life, health, and tranquillity, I

pray you to accept the homage of great and constant respect and

attachment."

To this Washington replied the next day as follows: "I yesterday

received, with sincere regret, your resignation of the office of

secretary of state. Since it has been impossible to prevail upon you to

forego any longer the indulgence of your desire for private life, the

event, however anxious I am to avert it, must be submitted to.

"But I can not suffer you to leave your station without assuring you

that the opinion which I had formed of your integrity and talents, and

which dictated your original nomination, has been confirmed by the

fullest experience, and that both have been eminently displayed in the

discharge of your duty.

"Let a conviction of my most earnest prayers for your happiness

accompany you in your retirement; and while I accept, with the warmest

thanks, your solicitude for my welfare, I beg you to believe that I

always am, dear sir, &c."

Edmund Randolph, the attorney-general, took Jefferson's place in the

cabinet, and his own was filled by William Bradford, of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Jefferson left the seat of government as soon as possible after

withdrawing from public life; and a fortnight after his resignation he

arrived at Monticello, his beautiful home in the interior of Virginia,

in full view of the Blue Ridge along a continuous line of almost sixty

miles. He was then fifty years of age. His whole family, with all his

servants, were at his home to receive him; and so delightful was this,

his first experience of private life for many long years, that he

resolved to abandon himself to it entirely.

He boasted, almost a month after he left Philadelphia, that he had not

seen a newspaper since his flight from the cares of government, and he

declared that he thought of never taking one again. "I think it is

Montaigne," he wrote to Edmund Randolph on the third of February, "who

has said that ignorance is the softest pillow on which a man can rest

his head. I am sure it is true, as to anything political, and shall

endeavor to estrange myself to everything of that character." But his

hatred of Hamilton, and his persistence in regarding the political

friends of that gentleman as necessarily corrupt, would not allow party

feud to sleep in his mind, and he added, in the next sentence, "I

indulge myself on one political topic only; that is, in declaring to my

countrymen the shameless corruption of a portion of the representatives

to the first and second Congress, and their implicit devotion to the

treasury."

Meanwhile, the report of Jefferson on commercial affairs was eliciting

warm debates in Congress. In that report he had suggested two methods

for modifying or removing commercial restrictions: first, by amicable

arrangements with foreign powers; and, secondly, by counteracting acts

of the legislature. With the design, as we have seen, of distressing

France by cutting off her supplies, two orders in council were issued by

the British government, one in June and the other in November, which

bore heavily upon the commercial prosperity of the United States. By the

first order, British cruisers were instructed to stop all ships laden

with corn, flour, or meal (corn-ships already alluded to), bound to any

French port, and send them to any convenient port, home or continental,

where the cargoes might be purchased in behalf of the British

government. By the second, British ships-of-war and privateers were

required to detain all vessels laden with goods produced in any colony

belonging to France, or with provisions for any such colony, and bring

them to adjudication before British courts of admiralty. These were such

flagrant outrages upon the rights of neutrals, that the United States

government strongly remonstrated against them as unjust in principle and

injurious in their practical effects. It was to these orders in council

and their effects that the president pointed in his annual message, when

urging the necessity of placing the country in a state of defense, and

in a position to assert its just rights.[63]

Mr. Jefferson's report gave rise to a series of resolutions offered, by

Mr. Madison on the third of January, 1794, the leading idea of which was

that of opposing commercial resistance to commercial injury, and to

enforce a perfect equality by retaliating impositions on the assumption

that the commercial system of Great Britain was hostile to that of the

United States. This scheme embodied the idea of a proposition made by

Madison in the first Congress. His resolutions now took wider range,

however, than did his proposition then. It was now proposed to impose

restrictions and additional duties on the manufactures and navigation of

nations which had no commercial treaties with the United States, and a

reduction of duties on the tonnage of vessels belonging to nations with

which such treaties existed.

FOOTNOTES:

[62] Letter to Doctor Walter Jones, January 2, 1814.

[63] In allusion to the annual and special messages of Washington at

this time, the eminent Charles James Fox made the following remarks in

the British parliament on the thirty-first of January, 1794:--

"And here, sir, I can not help alluding to the president of the

United States, General Washington, a character whose conduct has

been so different from that which has been pursued by ministers of

this country. How infinitely wiser must appear the spirit and

principles manifested in his late addresses to Congress than the

policy of modern European courts! Illustrious man! deriving honor

less from the splendor of his situation than from the dignity of

his mind; before whom all borrowed greatness sinks into

insignificance, and all the potentates of Europe (excepting the

members of our own royal family) become little and contemptible! He

has had no occasion to have recourse to any tricks of policy or

arts of alarm; his authority has been sufficiently supported by the

same means by which it was acquired, and his conduct has uniformly

been characterized by wisdom, moderation, and firmness. Feeling

gratitude to France for the assistance received from her in that

great contest which secured the independence of America, he did not

choose to give up the system of neutrality. Having once laid down

that line of conduct, which both gratitude and policy pointed out

as most proper to be pursued, not all the insults and provocations

of the French minister, Genet, could turn him from his purpose.

Intrusted with the welfare of a great people, he did not allow the

misconduct of another with respect to himself, for one moment, to

withdraw his attention from their interest. He had no fear of the

Jacobins; he felt no alarm for their principles, and considered no

precaution as necessary in order to stop their progress.

"The people over whom he presided he knew to be acquainted with

their rights and their duties. He trusted to their own good sense

to defeat the effect of those arts which might be employed to

inflame or mislead their minds; and was sensible that a government

could be in no danger while it retained the attachment and

confidence of its subjects; attachment, in this instance, not

blindly adopted--confidence not implicitly given, but arising from

the conviction of its excellence, and the experience of its

blessings. I can not, indeed, help admiring the wisdom and fortune

of this great man. By the phrase 'fortune,' I mean not in the

smallest degree to derogate from his merit. But, notwithstanding

his extraordinary talent and exalted integrity, it must be

considered as singularly fortunate that he should have experienced

a lot which so seldom falls to the portion of humanity, and have

passed through such a variety of scenes without stain and reproach.

It must indeed create astonishment, that, placed in circumstances

so critical, and filling for a series of years a station so

conspicuous, his character should never once have been called in

question; that he should in no one instance have been accused

either of improper insolence or of mean submission in his

transactions with foreign nations. For him it has been reserved to

run the race of glory, without experiencing the smallest

interruption to the brilliancy of his career."

Washington and the American Republic, Vol. 3. · 第 24 / 46 章