Reciprocity

The first requisite in life is that we shall be able to earn a living.

For our own good we must be able to produce as much or more than we

consume, and to make two grins grow where there was only a grouch before.

And we can help ourselves only by helping others. A transaction where

only one side makes money is immoral. ¶ Reciprocity, Co-operation,

Mutuality, are the three big words. To be of genuine advantage, all

human effort must be reciprocal. The worker who works merely with his

own benefit in mind doesn’t get much benefit ❦ Personal good comes

incidentally, and to go after a gain direct is to have it elude you.

The very effort you put forth to secure the thing sets in motion an

opposition that makes it slip away beyond your reach. The man who seizes

culture by the cosmic scruff will never secure her tender confidences.

¶ If you want to study the birds you do not go in wild search for them;

you simply seat yourself on a log in the woods and, lo! soon the branches

are vibrant with song. To clutch for love and demand it makes you both

unlovely and unlovable. If you would have friends, be one. ¶ This

great spiritual law which provides that we lose the thing for which we

selfishly strive has seemingly been overlooked in our universities and

institutions that foster the so-called Higher Culture. Fond parents send

their sons to college for but one reason—not to earn a living, not to

render the world a service, not to perform some necessary task—they send

them to college in order to absorb and appropriate a certain imaginary

good. The idea of reciprocity in a college is a barren ideality. The

“work” is non-productive, futile, fictive, fallacious and imaginary. In

all Nature there is no analogy to this thing of making an animal as big

as his father exempt from securing his own living ❦ The birds in the nest

are fed, and the young are suckled; but a weaning-time that does not

take place until long after adolescence is fraught with danger. The plan

is medieval and dates to a time when conspicuous waste and conspicuous

leisure were the badge of respectability. The college is really a

mendicant institution: its teachers and students belong to the parasitic

class. ¶ The fact that a thing has to be endowed proves there is

something wrong with it. It is not self-sufficient and in itself supplies

no excuse for being. It requires an explanation. No explanation ever

explains the necessity of making one. ¶ Our system of teaching will never

approximate the perfect until we devise an Industrial College where the

students will produce as well as consume. The school then will not be an

imitation of life—it will be life ❦ The fact that many college graduates

are highly successful men does not answer the argument—that very many

college graduates are wholly incompetent is the thing that forms the

damning count. The man who gets his education out of his work, at his

work, is the type that has always ruled and yet rules the world. We are

safe only as we move with Nature; and any system of teaching that seeks

to improve on Nature is founded on fallacy. ¶ There is only one valid

reason for sending a boy to college, and that is, so he can discover for

himself that there is nothing in it. A college degree, as matters now

stand, is like a certificate of character—useful only to those who need

it. However, there must surely come a time when degrees will be given

only to those who can earn a living—and this degree will be signed by the

young man’s employer. ¶ All this for the simple reason that no man is a

safe person whose time is not employed in some useful daily occupation

where others as well as himself are the gainers. Time and energy not

used, or misused, form a dangerous dynamite; while time and human effort

fused with reciprocity produce radium. Can you earn a living? Also, do

you? ❦

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

The philosophy of Elbert Hubbard · 第 39 / 50 题