Chapter XIII

Poems on Classical Subjects

During these years, 1869-1878, Browning's outward life maintained its

accustomed ways. In the summer of 1869 he wandered with his son and his

sister, in company with his friends of Italian days, the Storys, in

Scotland, and at Lock Luichart Lodge visited Lady Ashburton.[103] Three

summers, those of 1870, 1872 and 1873 were spent at Saint-Aubin, a wild

"un-Murrayed" village on the coast of Normandy, where Milsand occupied a

little cottage hard by. At night the light-house of Havre shot forth its

beam, and it was with "a thrill" that Browning saw far off the spot

where he had once sojourned with his wife.[104] "I don't think we were

ever quite so thoroughly washed by the sea-air from all quarters as

here," he wrote in August 1870. Every morning, as Mme. Blanc (Th.

Bentzon) tells us, he might be seen "walking along the sands with the

small Greek copy of Homer which was his constant companion. On Sunday he

went with the Milsands ... to a service held in the chapel of the

Chateau Blagny, at Lion-sur-Mer, for the few Protestants of that region.

They were generally accompanied by a young Huguenot peasant, their

neighbour, and Browning with the courtesy he showed to every woman, used

to take a little bag from the hands of the strong Norman girl,

notwithstanding her entreaties." The visit of 1870 was saddened by the

knowledge of what France was suffering during the progress of the war.

He lingered as long as possible for the sake of comradeship with

Milsand, around whose shoulder Browning's arm would often lie as they

walked together on the beach.[105] But communication with England became

daily more and more difficult. Milsand insisted that his friend should

instantly return. It is said by Mme. Blanc that Browning was actually

suspected by the peasants of a neighbouring village of being a Prussian

spy. Not without difficulty he and his sister reached Honfleur, where an

English cattle-boat was found preparing to start at midnight for

Southampton.

Two years later Miss Thackeray was also on the coast of Normandy and at

no great distance. "It was a fine hot summer," she writes, "with

sweetness and completeness everywhere; the cornfields gilt and

far-stretching, the waters blue, the skies arching high and clear, and

the sunsets succeeding each other in most glorious light and beauty."

Some slight misunderstanding on Browning's part, the fruit of

mischief-making gossipry, which caused constraint between him and his

old friend was cleared away by the good offices of Milsand. While Miss

Thackeray sat writing, with shutters closed against the blazing sun,

Browning himself "dressed all in white, with a big white umbrella under

his arm," arrived to take her hand with all his old cordiality. A

meeting of both with the Milsands, then occupying a tiny house in a

village on the outer edges of Luc-sur-mer, soon followed, and before the

sun had fallen that evening they were in Browning's house upon the cliff

at Saint-Aubin. "The sitting-room door opened to the garden and the sea

beyond--fresh-swept bare floor, a table, three straw chairs, one book

upon the table. Mr Browning told us it was the only book he had with

him. The bedrooms were as bare as the sitting-room, but I remember a

little dumb piano standing in a corner, on which he used to practise in

the early morning. I heard Mr Browning declare they were perfectly

satisfied with their little house; that his brains, squeezed as dry as a

sponge, were only ready for fresh air."[106] Perhaps Browning's "only

book" of 1872 contained the dramas of Æschylus, for at Fontainebleau

where he spent some later weeks of the year these were the special

subject of his study. It was at Saint-Aubin in 1872 that he found the

materials for his poem of the following year, and to Miss Thackeray's

drowsy name for the district,

Symbolic of the place and people too,

_White Cotton Night-Cap Country_, the suggestion of Browning's title

_Red Cotton Night-Cap Country_ is due. To her the poem is dedicated.

Browning's interest in those who were rendered homeless and destitute in

France during the Prussian invasion was shown in a practical way in the

spring of 1871. He had for long been averse to the publication of his

poems in magazines and reviews. In 1864 he had gratified his American

admirers by allowing _Gold Hair_ and _Prospice_ to appear in the

_Atlantic Monthly_ previous to their inclusion in _Dramatis Persona._ A

fine sonnet written in 1870, suggested by the tower erected at

Clandeboye by Lord Dufferin in memory of his mother, Helen, Countess of

Gifford, had been inserted in some undistributed copies of a pamphlet,

"Helen's Tower," privately printed twenty years previously; the sonnet

was published at the close of 1883 in the _Pall Mall Gazette_, but was

not given a place by Browning in the collected editions of his Poetical

Works. In general he felt that the miscellaneous contents of a magazine,

surrounding a poem, formed hardly an appropriate setting for such verse

as his. In February 1871, however, he offered to his friend and,

publisher Mr Smith the ballad of _Hervé Riel_ for use in the _Cornhill

Magazine_ of March, venturing for once, as he says, to puff his wares

and call the verses good. His purpose was to send something to the

distressed people of Paris, and one hundred guineas, the sum liberally

fixed by Mr Smith as the price of the poem, were duly forwarded--the

gift of the English poet and his Breton hero. The facts of the story had

been forgotten and were denied at St Malo; the reports of the French

Admiralty were examined and indicated the substantial accuracy of the

poem. On one point Browning erred; it was not a day's holiday to be

spent with his wife "la Belle Aurore" which the Breton sailor petitioned

for as the reward of his service, but a "congé absolu," the holiday of a

life-time. In acknowledging his error to Dr Furnivall, and adding an

explanation of its cause, he dismissed the subject with the word,

"Truth above all things; so treat the matter as you please."[107]

For the purposes of holiday-making the resources of the northern French

coast, with which Browning's ballad of the Croisickese pilot is

associated, were, says Mrs Orr, becoming exhausted. Yet some rest and

refreshment after the heavy tax upon his strength made by a London

season with its various claims were essential to his well-being. His

passion for music would not permit him during his residence in town to

be absent from a single important concert; the extraordinary range of

his acquaintance with the works of great and even of obscure composers

was attested by Halle. In his sonnet of 1884, inscribed in the Album to

Mr Arthur Chappell, _The Founder of the Feast_, a poem not included in

any edition of his works, he recalls these evenings of delight:

Sense has received the utmost Nature grants,

My cup was filled with rapture to the brim,

When, night by night--ah, memory, how it haunts!--

Music was poured by perfect ministrants,

By Halle, Schumann, Piatti, Joachim.

Long since in Florence he had become acquainted with Miss Egerton-Smith,

who loved music like himself, and was now often his companion at public

performances in London. She was wealthy, and with too little confidence

in her power to win the regard of others, she lived apart from the great

world. In 1872 Browning lost the warm-hearted and faithful friend who

had given him such prompt, womanly help in his worst days of grief--Miss

Blagden. Her place in his memory remained her own. Miss Egerton-Smith

might seem to others wanting in strength of feeling and cordiality of

manner. Browning knew the sensitiveness of her nature, which responded

to the touch of affection, and he could not fail to discover her true

self, veiled though it was by a superficial reserve. And as he knew her,

so he wrote of her in the opening of his _La Saisiaz_:

You supposed that few or none had known and loved you in the world:

May be! flower that's full-blown tempts the butterfly, not flower that's furled.

But more learned sense unlocked you, loosed the sheath and let expand

Bud to bell and out-spread flower-shape at the least warm touch of hand

--Maybe throb of heart, beneath which,--quickening farther than it knew,--

Treasure oft was disembosomed, scent all strange and unguessed hue.

Disembosomed, re-embosomed,--must one memory suffice,

Prove I knew an Alpine rose which all beside named Edelweiss?

Miss Egerton-Smith was the companion and house-mate of Browning and his

sister in their various summer wanderings from 1874 to 1877. In the

first of these years the three friends occupied a house facing the sea

at the village of Mers near Tréport. Browning at this time was much

absorbed by his _Aristophanes' Apology_. "Here," writes Mrs Orr, "with

uninterrupted quiet, and in a room devoted to his use, Mr Browning would

work till the afternoon was advanced, and then set off on a long walk

over the cliffs, often in the face of a wind, which, as he wrote of it

at the time, he could lean against as if it were a wall." The following

summers were spent at Villers in Normandy (1875), at the Isle of Arran

(1876), and in the upland country of the Salève, near Geneva. During the

visit to the Salève district, where Browning and his sister with Miss

Egerton-Smith occupied a chalet named La Saisiaz, he was, Mrs Orr tells

us, "unusually depressed and unusually disposed to regard the absence

from home as a banishment." Yet the place seemed lovely to him in its

solitude and its beauty; the prospect of Geneva, with lake and plain

extended below, varying in appearance with the shifting of clouds, was

repose to his sense of sight. He bathed twice each day in the mountain

stream--"a marvel of delicate delight framed in with trees." He read and

rested; and wrote but little or not at all. Suddenly the repose of La

Saisiaz was broken up; the mood of languorous pleasure and drowsy

discontent was at an end. While preparing to join her friend on a

long-intended mountain climb Miss Egerton-Smith, with no forewarning,

died. The shock was for a time overwhelming. When Browning returned to

London the poem _La Saisiaz_, the record of his inquisition into the

mystery of death, of his inward debate concerning a future life, was

written. It was the effort of resilience in his spirit in opposition to

that stroke which deprived him of the friend who was so near and dear.

The grouping of the works produced by Browning from the date of the

publication of _The Ring and the Book_ (1868) to the publication of _La

Saisias_ (1878), which is founded upon the occasions that suggested

them, has only an external and historical interest. The studies in the

Greek drama and the creations to which these gave rise extend at

intervals over the whole decade. _Balaustion's Adventure_ was published

in 1871, _Aristophanes' Apology_ in 1875, the translation of _The

Agamemnon of Æschylus_ in 1877. Two of the volumes of this period,

_Prince Hohenstiel-Schwangau_ (1871) and _Fifine at the Fair_ (1872) are

casuistical monologues, and these, it will be observed, lie side by side

in the chronological order. The first of the pair is concerned with

public and political life, with the conduct and character of a man

engaged in the affairs of state; the second, with a domestic question,

the casuistry of wedded fidelity and infidelity, from which the scope of

the poem extends itself to a wider survey of human existence and its

meanings.[108] Two of the volumes are narrative poems, each tending to a

tragic crisis; _Red Cotton Night-Cap Country_ (1873) is a story

entangled with questions relating to religion; _The Inn Album_ (1875) is

a tragedy of the passion of love. The volume of 1876, _Pacchiarotto with

other Poems_, is the miscellaneous gathering of lyrical and narrative

pieces which had come into being during a period of many years. Finally

in _La Saisiaz_ Browning, writing in his own person, records the

experience of his spirit in confronting the problem of death. But it was

part of his creed that the gladness of life may take hands with its

grief, that the poet who would live mightily must live joyously; and in

the volume which contained his poem of strenuous and virile sorrow he

did not refrain from including a second piece, _The two Poets of

Croisic_, which has in it much matter of honest mirth, and closes with

the declaration that the test of greatness in an artist lies in his

power of converting his more than common sufferings into a more than

common joy.

_Balaustion's Adventure_, dedicated to the Countess Cowper by whom the

transcript from Euripides was suggested, or, as Browning will have it,

prescribed, proved, as the dedication declares, "the most delightful of

May-month amusements" in the spring of 1871. It was the happiest of

thoughts to give the version of Euripides' play that setting which has

for its source a passage at the close of Plutarch's life of Nicias. The

favours bestowed by the Syracusans upon Athenian slaves and fugitives

who could delight them by reciting or singing the verses of Euripides is

not to be marvelled at, says Plutarch, "weying a reporte made of a ship

of the city of Caunus, that on a time being chased thether by pyrates,

thinking to save themselves within their portes, could not at the first

be received, but had repulse: howbeit being demaunded whether they could

sing any of Euripides songes, and aunswering that they could, were

straight suffered to enter, and come in."[109] From this root blossomed

Browning's romance of the Rhodian girl, who saves her country folk and

wins a lover and a husband by her delight in the poetry of one who was

more highly honoured abroad than in his own Athens. Perhaps Browning

felt that an ardent girl would be the best interpreter of the womanly

heroism and the pathos of "that strangest, saddest, sweetest song," of

Euripides. Of all its author's dramas the Alkestis is the most

appropriate to the occasion, for it is the poem of a great deliverance

from death, and here in effect it delivers from death, or worse, the

fugitives from the pirate-bark, "at destruction's very edge," who are

the suppliants to Syracuse. In accepting the task imposed upon him

Browning must have felt that no other play of Euripides could so

entirely have borne out the justice of the characterisation of the poet

by Mrs Browning in the lines which he prefixed to _Balaustions

Adventure_:

Our Euripides the human,

With his droppings of warm tears.

"If the Alkestis is not the masterpiece of the genius of Euripides,"

wrote Paul de Saint-Victor, "it is perhaps the masterpiece of his

heart."[110]

Balaustion herself, not a rose of "the Rosy Isle" but its

wild-pomegranate-flower, since amid the verdure of the tree "you shall

find food, drink, odour all at once," is Hellenic in her bright and

swift intelligence, her enthusiasm for all noble things of the mind, the

grace of every movement of her spirit, her culture and her beauty. The

atmosphere of the poem, which encircles the translation, is singularly

luminous and animating; the narrative of the adventure is rapid yet

always lucid; the verse leaps buoyantly like a wave of the sea.

Balaustion tells her tale to the four Greek girls, her companions, amid

the free things of nature, the overhanging grape vines, the rippling

stream,

Outsmoothing galingale and watermint,

Its mat-floor,

and in presence of the little temple Baccheion, with its sanctities of

religion and of art. By a happy and original device the transcript of

the Alkestis is much more than a translation; it is a translation

rendered into dramatic action--for we see and hear the performers and

they are no longer masked--and this is accompanied with a commentary or

an interpretation. Never was a more graceful apology for the function of

the critic put forward than that of Balaustion:

'Tis the poet speaks:

But if I, too, should try and speak at times,

Leading your love to where my love, perchance,

Climbed earlier, found a nest before you knew--

Why, bear with the poor climber, for love's sake!

Browning has not often played the part of a critic, and the

interpretation of a poet's work by a poet has the double value of

throwing light upon the mind of the original writer and the mind of his

commentator.

The life of mortals and the life of the immortal gods are brought into a

beautiful relation throughout the play. It is pre-eminently human in its

grief and in its joy; yet at every point the divine care, the divine

help surrounds and supports the children of earth, with their transitory

tears and smiles. Apollo has been a herdsman in the service of Admetos;

Herakles, most human of demigods, is the king's friend and guest. The

interest of the play for Browning lay especially in three things--the

pure self-sacrifice of the heroine, devotion embodied in one supreme

deed; and no one can heighten the effect with which Euripides has

rendered this; secondly, the joyous, beneficent strength of Herakles,

and this Browning has felt in a peculiar degree, and by his commentary

has placed it in higher relief; and thirdly, the purification and

elevation through suffering of the character of Admetos; here it would

be rash to assert that Browning has not divined the intention of

Euripides, but certainly he has added something of his own. It has been

maintained that Browning's interpretation of the spiritual significance

of the drama is a beautiful perversion of the purpose of the Greek poet;

that Admetos needs no purification; that in accepting his wife's offer

to be his substitute in dying, the king was no craven but a king who

recognised duty to the state as his highest duty. The general feeling of

readers of the play does not fall in with this ingenious plea. Browning,

as appears from his imagined recast of the theme, which follows the

transcript, had considered and rejected it. If Admetos is to be in some

degree justified, it can only be by bearing in mind that the fact by

which he shall himself escape from death is of Apollo's institution, and

that obedience to the purpose of Apollo rendered self-preservation a

kind of virtue. But Admetos makes no such defence of his action when

replying to the reproaches of his father, and he anticipates that the

verdict of the world will be against him. Browning undoubtedly presses

the case against Admetos far more strongly than does Euripides, who

seems to hold that a man weak in one respect, weak when brought to face

the test of death, may yet be strong in the heroic mastery of grief

which is imposed upon him by the duties of hospitality. Readers of the

Winter's Tale have sometimes wondered whether there could be much

rapture of joy in the heart of the silent Hermione when she received

back her unworthy husband. If Admetos remained at the close of the play

what he is understood by Browning to have been at its opening, reunion

with a self-lover so base could hardly have flushed with gladness the

spirit of Alkestis just escaped from the shades.[111] But Alkestis, who

had proved her own loyalty by deeds, values deeds more than words. When

dying she had put her love into an act, and had refrained from mere

words of wifely tenderness; death put an end to her services to her

husband; she felt towards him as any wife, if Browning's earlier poem be

true, may feel to any husband; but still she could render a service to

her children, and she exacts from Admetos the promise that he will never

place a stepmother over them. His allegiance to this vow is an act, and

it shall be for Alkestis the test of his entire loyalty. And the good

Herakles, who enjoys a glorious jest amazingly, and who by that jest can

benevolently retort upon Admetos for his concealment of Alkestis'

death--for now the position is reversed and the king shall receive her

living, and yet believe her dead--Herakles contrives to put Admetos to

that precise test which is alone sufficient to assure Alkestis of his

fidelity. Words are words; but here is a deed, and Admetos not only

adheres to his pledge, but demonstrates to her that for him to violate

it is impossible. She may well accept him as at length proved to be her

very own.

Browning, who delights to show how good is brought out of evil, or what

appears such to mortal eyes, is not content with this. He must trace

the whole process of the purification of the soul of Admetos, by sorrow

and its cruel yet beneficent reality, and in his commentary he

emphasises each point of development in that process. When his wife lies

at the point of death the sorrow of Admetos is not insincere, but there

was a childishness in it, for he would not confront the fact that the

event was of his own election. Presently she has departed, and he begins

to taste the truth, to distinguish between a sorrow rehearsed in fancy

and endured in fact. In greeting Herakles he rises to a manlier strain,

puts tears away, and accepts the realities of life and death; he will

not add ill to ill, as the sentimentalist does, but will be just to the

rights of earth that remain; he catches some genuine strength from the

magnanimous presence of the hero-god. He renders duty to the dead; is

quieted; and enters more and more into the sternness of his solitary

wayfaring. In dealing with the ignoble wrangle with old Pheres the

critic is hard set; but Balaustion, speaking as interpreter for

Browning, explains that for a little the king lapses back from the

firmer foothold which he had attained. Perhaps it would have been wiser

to admit that Euripides has marred his own work by this grim

tragic-comic encounter of crabbed age and youth. But it is true that one

who has much to give, like Alkestis, gives freely; and one who has

little to give, like Pheres, clutches that little desperately and is

starved not only in possessions but in soul. For Browning the

significance of the scene lies in the idea, which if not just is

ingenious, that the encounter with Pheres has an educational value for

Admetos; he detests his father because he sees in him an image of his

own egoism, and thus he learns more profoundly to hate his baser self.

When the body of Alkestis has been borne away and the king re-enters his

desolate halls the full truth breaks in upon him; nothing can be as it

has been before--"He stared at the impossible mad life"; he has learnt

that life, which yet shall be rightly lived, is a harder thing than

death:

He was beginning to be like his wife.

And those around him felt that having descended in grief so far to the

truth of things, he could not but return to the light an altered and a

better man. Instructed so deeply in the realities of sorrow, Admetos is

at last made worthy to receive the blessed realities of joy with the

words,

When I betray her, though she is no more,

May I die.

The regeneration of Admetos is accomplished. How much in all this

exposition is derived from the play, how much is added to it, may be

left for the consideration of the reader who will compare the original

with the transcript.

If the character of Admetos is somewhat lowered by Browning beneath the

conception of the Greek dramatist, to allow room for its subsequent

elevation, the conception of Herakles is certainly heightened. We shall

not say that Balaustion is the speaker and that Herakles is somewhat of

a woman's hero. Browning himself fully enters into Balaustion's

enthusiasm. And the presence of the strong, joyous helper of men is in

truth an inspiring one. The great voice that goes before him is itself a

_Sursum corda!_--a challenge and a summons to whatever manliness is in

us. And the best of it is that sauntering the pavement or crossing the

ferry we may happen to encounter this face of Herakles:

Out of this face emerge banners and horses--O superb! I see what is coming;

I see the high pioneer-caps--I see the slaves of runners clearing the way,

I hear victorious drums.

This face is a life-boat.

For Walt Whitman too had seen Brother Jonathan Herakles, and indeed the

face of the strong and tender wound-dresser was itself as the face of a

calmer Herakles to many about to die. The speeches of the demigod in

Browning's transcript require an abundant commentary, but it is the

commentary of an irrepressible joy, an outbreak of enthusiasm which will

not be controlled. The glorious Gargantuan creature, in the best sense

Rabelaisian, is uplifted by Browning into a very saint of joyous effort;

no pallid ascetic, indeed, beating his breast with the stone, but a

Christian saint of Luther's school, while at the same time a somewhat

over-boisterous benevolent Paynim giant:

Gladness be with thee, Helper of our world!

I think this is the authentic sign and sea!

Of Godship, that it ever waxes glad,

And more glad, until gladness blossoms, bursts

Into a rage to suffer for mankind,

And recommence at sorrow.

Something of the Herakles ideal appears again and again in other poems

of Browning. His Breton sailor, Hervé Riel, has more than a touch of the

Heraclean frankness of gaiety in arduous effort. His Ivàn Ivànovitch

wields the axe and abolishes a life with the Heraclean joy in

righteousness. And in the last of Browning's poems, not without a

pathetically over-boisterous effort and strain, there is the suggestion

of an ideal conception of himself as a Herakles-Browning; the old man

tries at least to send his great voice before him.

The new Admetos, new Alkestis, imagined by Balaustion at the close of

the poem, are wedded lovers who, like the married in Pompilia's dream of

heaven, "know themselves into one." For them the severance of death has

become an impossible thing; and therefore no place is left for Herakles

in this treatment of the story. It expresses Browning's highest

conception of the union of soul with soul:

Therewith her whole soul entered into his,

He looked the look back, and Alkestis died--

died only to be rejected by Hades, as still living, and with a more

potent life, in her husband's heart and will. Yet the mortal cloud is

round these mortals still; they cannot see things as the gods see. And,

for all their hopes and endeavours, the earth which they would renew and

make as heaven, remains the old incredulous, unconverted earth,--"Such

is the envy Gods still bear mankind." And in such an earth, if not for

them, assuredly for others, Herakles may find great deeds to do.

Balaustion has the unique distinction of being heroine throughout two of

Browning's poems; and of both we may say that the genius of Euripides is

the hero. _Aristophanes' Apology_ is written from first to last with

unflagging energy; the translation of the "Herakles" which it includes

is a masculine and masterly effort to transport the whole sense and

spirit of the original into English verse, and the rendering of the

choral passages into lyric form gives it an advantage over the

transcript of the "Alkestis." Perhaps not a little of the self-defence

of Aristophanes and his statement of the case against Euripides could

have been put as well or better in a critical essay in prose; but the

method of Browning enables him to mingle, in a dramatic fashion, truth

with sophistry, and to make both serve his purpose of presenting not

only the case but the character of the great Greek maker of comedy.

Balaustion is no longer the ardent girl of the days of her first

adventure; she is a wife, with the dignity, the authority of womanhood

and wifehood; she has known the life of Athens with its evil and its

good; she has been the favoured friend of Euripides; she is capable of

confronting his powerful rival in popular favour, and of awing him into

sobriety and becoming manners; with an instinctive avoidance she recoils

from whatever is gross or uncomely; yet she can do honour to the true

light of intellect and genius even though it shines through earth-born

vapours and amid base surroundings.

Athens, "the life and light of the whole world," has sunk under the

power of Sparta, and it can be henceforth no home for Balaustion and her

Euthukles. The bark that bears them is bounding Rhodesward, and the

verse has in it the leap and race of the prow. Balaustion, stricken at

heart, yet feels that this tragedy of Athens brings the tragic

katharsis; the justice of the gods is visible in it; and above man's

wickedness and folly she reaches to "yon blue liberality of heaven." It

seems as if the spirit which might have saved Athens is that of the

loins girt and the lamp lit which was embodied in the strenuous devotion

of Euripides to the highest things; and the spirit which has brought

Athens to its ruin is that expressed with a splendid power through the

work of Aristophanes. But Aristophanes shall plead for himself and leave

nothing unsaid that can serve to vindicate him as a poet and even as a

moralist Thus only can truth in the end stand clear, assured of its

supremacy over falsehood and over half-truth.

Nothing that Browning has written is more vividly imagined than the

encounter of Balaustion with Aristophanes and his crew of revellers on

the night when the tidings of the death of Euripides reached Athens; it

rouses and controls the feelings with the tumult of life and the

sanctity of death, while also imposing itself on the eye as a brilliant

and a solemn picture. The revellers scatter before the presence of

Balaustion, and she and the great traducer of Euripides stand face to

face. Nowhere else has Browning presented this conception of the man of

vast disorderly genius, who sees and approves the better way and

splendidly follows the worse:

Such domineering deity

Hephaistos might have carved to cut the brine

For his gay brother's prow, imbrue that path

Which, purpling, recognised the conqueror.

It is as if male force, with the lust of the eye, the lust of the flesh,

and the pride of life behind it, were met and held in check by the finer

feminine force resting for its support upon the divine laws. But in

truth Aristophanes is half on the side of Balaustion and of Euripides;

he must, indeed, make his stand; he is not one to falter or quail; and

yet when the sudden cloud falls upon his face he knows that it is his

part to make the worse appear the better cause, knowing this all the

more because the justice of Balaustion's regard perceives and recognises

his higher self. Suddenly the Tuphon, "madding the brine with wrath or

monstrous sport," is transformed into something like what the child saw

once from the Rhodian sea-coast (the old romantic poet in Browning is

here young once more):

All at once, large-looming from his wave,

Out leaned, chin hand-propped, pensive on the ledge,

A sea-worn face, sad as mortality,

Divine with yearning after fellowship.

He rose but breast-high. So much god she saw;

So much she sees now, and does reverence.

But in a moment the sea-god is again the sea-monster, with "tail-splash,

frisk of fin"; the majestic Aristophanes relapses into the most

wonderful of mockers.

No passage in the poem is quite so impressive as this through its

strangeness in beauty. But the entry of Sophocles--"an old pale-swathed

majesty,"--at the supper which followed the performance of the play, is

another of those passages to find which _in situ_ is a sufficient reward

for reading many laborious pages that might almost as well have been

thrown into an imaginary conversation in prose:

Then the grey brow sank low, and Sophokles

Re-swathed him, sweeping doorward: mutely passed

'Twixt rows as mute.

The critical study of comedy, its origin, its development, its

function, its decline, is written with admirable vigour, but the case of

Aristophanes can be read elsewhere. It is interesting, however, to note

the argument in support of the thesis that comedy points really to

ideals of humanity which are beyond human attainment; that its mockery

of man's infirmities implies a conception of our nature which in truth

is extra-human; while tragedy on the contrary accepts man as he is, in

his veritable weakness and veritable strength, and wrings its pity and

its terror out of these. It is Aristophanes who thus vindicates

Euripides before the revellers who have assembled in his own honour, and

they accept what seems to them a paradox as his finest stroke of irony.

But he has indeed after the solemn withdrawal of Sophocles looked for a

moment through life and death, and seen in his hour of highest success

his depth of failure. For him, in this testing-time of life, art has

been the means of probation; he has squandered the gifts bestowed upon

him, which should have been concentrated in the special task to which he

was summoned. He should have known--he did in fact know--that the art

which "makes grave" is higher than that which "makes grin"; his own

peculiar duty was to advance his art one step beyond his predecessors;

to create a drama which should bring into harmony the virtue of tragedy

and the virtue of comedy; to discover the poetry which

Makes wise, not grave,--and glad,

Not grinning: whereby laughter joins with tears.

Instead of making this advance he had retrograded; and it remained for a

poet of a far-off future in the far-off Kassiterides--the Tin Isle

which has Stratford at its heart--to accomplish the task on which

Aristophanes would not adventure. One way a brilliant success was

certain for Aristophanes; the other and better way failure was possible;

and he declined to make the venture of faith. It is with this sense of

self-condemnation upon him that he essays his own defence, and it is

against this sense of self-condemnation more than against the genius and

the methods of Euripides that he struggles. When towards the close of

the poem he takes in hand the psalterion, and chants in splendid strains

the story of Thamuris, who aspired and failed, as he himself will never

do, the reader is almost won over to his side. Browning, who felt the

heights and depths of the lyric genius of Aristophanes, would seem to

have resolved that in this song of "Thamuris marching," moving in

ecstasy amid the glories of an autumn morning, he would dramatically

justify his conception of the poet; and never in his youth did Browning

sing with a finer rapture of spirit. But reading what follows, the

record of the subjugation of Athens, when the Athenian people accept the

ruin of their defences as if it were but a fragment of Aristophanic

comedy, we perceive that this song, which breaks off with an uproar of

laughter, is the condemnation as well as the glory of the singer.

The translation of _Agamemnon_, the preface to which is dated "October

1st, 1877," was undertaken at the request or command of Carlyle. The

argument of the preface fails to justify Browning's method. A

translation "literal at every cost save that of absolute violence to our

language" may be highly desirable; it is commonly called a "crib"; and

a crib contrived by one who is not only a scholar but a man of genius

will now and again yield a word or a phrase of felicitous precision. But

that a translation "literal at every cost" should be put into verse is a

wrong both to the original and to the poetry of the language to which

the original is transferred; it assumes a poetic garb which in assuming

it rends to tatters. A translation into verse implies that a certain

beauty of form is part of the writer's aim; it implies that a poem is to

be reproduced as a poem, and not as that bastard product of learned ill

judgment--a glorified crib; and a glorified crib is necessarily a bad

crib. Mrs Orr, who tells us that Browning refused to regard even the

first of Greek writers as models of literary style, had no doubt that

the translation of the _Agamemnon_ was partly made for the pleasure of

exposing the false claims made on their behalf. Such a supposition does

not agree well with Browning's own Preface; but if he had desired to

prove that the _Agamemnon_ can be so rendered as to be barely readable,

he has been singularly successful. From first to last in the genius of

Browning there was an element, showing itself from time to time, of

strange perversity.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 103: Was this a "baffled visit," as described by Mr Henry

James in his "Life of Story" (ii. 197), when the hostess was absent, and

the guests housed in an inn?]

[Footnote 104: Letter quoted by Mrs Orr, p. 288.]

[Footnote 105: The attitude is reproduced in a photograph from which a

woodcut is given in Mme. Blanc's article "A French Friend of Browning."]

[Footnote 106: "Records of Tennyson, Ruskin and Browning," by Annie

Ritchie, pp. 291, 292.]

[Footnote 107: "A Bibliography of the Writings of Robert Browning," by

T.J. Wise, pp. 157, 158.]

[Footnote 108: _Aristophanes' Apology_ is connected with these poems by

its character as a casuistical self-defence of the chief speaker.]

[Footnote 109: North's "Plutarch," 1579, p. 599.]

[Footnote 110: "Les Deux Masques," ii. 281.]

[Footnote 111: A comment of Paul de Saint-Victor on the silence of the

recovered Alkestis deserves to be quoted: "Hercule apprend à Admète

qu'il lui est interdit d'entendre sa voix avant qu'elle soit purifiée de

sa consécration aux Divinités infernales. J'aime mieux voir dans cette

réserve un scrupule religieux du poète laissant à la morte sa dignité

d'Ombre. Alceste a été nitiée aux profonds mystères de la mort; elle a

vu l'invisible, elle a entendu l'ineffable; toute parole sortie de ses

lèvres serait une divulgation sacrilège. Ce silence mystérieux la

spiritualise et la rattache par un dernier lien au monde éternel."]

Robert Browning(#12817) · 第 13 / 17 章