Missouri first applied for authority to form a State government, which
arrayed the South against the North, the slaveholding against the
non-slaveholding states. Missouri, having been considered a portion of
Louisiana, had derived from her connexion with the French and the
Spaniards the custom of holding slaves, which she considered as her
right. It was proposed, however, that in “admitting the territory to the
privileges of a state, slavery, or involuntary servitude, should be
prohibited, except for the punishment of crimes of which the party
should have been duly convicted; and that all children born within the
said state after its admission into the Union should be free at the age
of twenty-five.” This clause divided congress into two parties: the
non-slaveholding states demanded the restriction; the southern and slave
states rejected it. The contest of opinion was violent in the extreme.
Two principles seemed involved in this question; not only resistance to
slavery, but resistance to the interference of congress in the internal
government of individual states; and hence many advocates of sound
liberty and friends to the emancipation and elevation of the slave
opposed the restrictive clause.
After much violent discussion, the Missouri question was settled by a
compromise, which, while it allowed slavery in Missouri, prohibited it
in all the territory of the United States north and west of the northern
limits of Arkansas; and in August, 1821, Missouri became the
twenty-fourth state in the Union.
In 1821 Monroe entered upon his second presidential term, having been
re-elected, as was also Daniel Tomkins as vice-president.
The fourth census, taken in the year 1820, showed the population of the
United States to be 9,625,734; about a million and a half of whom were
slaves.
On the 7th of March in this year, General Jackson was appointed governor
of Florida and Elijeus Fromentin chief-justice. The Spanish officers,
very unwilling to give up their posts, threw many impediments in the way
of the new government, and refused to give up the archives which had
been stipulated for; and even when they were obtained, certain documents
were kept back by Don Cavalla, the Spanish governor. But Jackson, who
very well understood how to exercise authority, sent an armed force to
bring Cavalla before him; and as he still refused, had him carried from
his bed to prison, when he took possession of the papers, after which he
was discharged. Again these summary measures were severely commented
upon; but they were only according to Jackson’s mode of action—prompt,
overbearing, and successful. Florida was divided into two counties, St.
John’s, on the east of the Suwaney river, and Escambia on the west.
Jackson’s term of office expired with the rising of congress, and he
declined a re-appointment.
In 1822 a convention of navigation and commerce was concluded on terms
of reciprocal and equal advantage between France and the United States.
In the same year the ports of the West India Islands were opened to the
American Republic by act of the British parliament.
The American commerce having for many years suffered greatly from the
depredations of pirates in the West Indies, a small naval force was sent
against them, which recaptured five American vessels in the vicinity of
Matanzas in Cuba, and destroyed upwards of twenty piratical vessels. But
depredations still continuing, a larger force was sent out the following
year, under Commodore Porter, which broke up their retreats in these
seas, and sent them to other hiding-places, whence they reappeared after
a time.
In 1823 congress recognised the independence of the South American
republics, and ministers were sent to Mexico, Buenos Ayres, and Chili.
The same year, articles of convention for the suppression of the African
slave-trade were signed in London by agents sent for that purpose from
the United States, and officers were commissioned by each nation to
capture and condemn such ships as should be concerned in this illicit
traffic.
During the summer of 1824 the venerable La Fayette, now seventy years of
age, visited America, by express invitation from congress, after the
lapse of nearly half a century. He was received at New York with every
demonstration of respect, and made a tour through all the states of the
Union, upwards of 5,000 miles, which was in fact a triumphal progress,
state vying with state as to which should show him most affection and
honour. Finally he sailed from Washington, in September, in an American
frigate prepared for his accommodation, and called the Brandywine, from
the battle in which he was wounded.
In the year 1825, John Quincy Adams was inaugurated as president, and J.
C. Calhoun, of South Carolina, vice-president. The administration of the
ex-president had been marked by singular prosperity. Sixty millions of
dollars of the national debt had been paid off, and party-feeling had so
much abated that this period is signalised as “the era of good-feeling.”
The new president, taking a review of the past in his inaugural speech,
remarked: “The year of jubilee since the first formation of our Union is
past, that of our Declaration of Independence is at hand. Since that
period a population of 4,000,000 has multiplied to 12,000,000. A
territory bounded by the Mississippi had been extended from sea to sea.
New states have been admitted to the Union in numbers almost equal to
those of the first confederation. Treaties of peace, amity, and commerce
have been concluded with the principal dominions of the earth. The
people of other nations, inhabitants of regions acquired not by conquest
but by compact, have been united to us in the participation of our
rights and duties, our burdens and our blessings.”
On the 4th of July, 1825—that jubilee of the Declaration of Independence
of which the president had just spoken, and which was celebrated
throughout the Union as a great national festival—died two venerable
ex-presidents, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, both members of the
early colonial congresses; the former of whom nominated Washington as
commander-in-chief of the army, the latter drew up the celebrated
Declaration of Independence.
CHAPTER XXI.
EVENTS OF TWENTY YEARS.
We must now rapidly pass over the remaining quarter of a century, and in
so doing merely pause upon such events as give a marked character to the
progress of the years.
The first which we shall notice is of a moral rather than a political
character; one calculated to produce infinite results for the happiness
of humanity. It was in the year 1826 when temperance societies took
their first organised form. At that time one of the besetting sins of
the Americans was the use of ardent spirits; and so widely-spread was
this pernicious habit of dram-drinking, that the statistics of that
period present a calculation that, out of a white population of
10,000,000, between 3,000,000 and 4,000,000 were habitual
spirit-drinkers, of whom 375,000 drank daily on an average three gills
of ardent spirits, while an equal number consumed more than twice the
quantity, and of course were drunkards—a disgrace to themselves and
their country, and a perpetual source of discomfort to their relatives
and friends. In this situation of things, continues Hinton, in his
History, from which we have taken the above calculations, a few
individuals in the state of Massachusetts undertook the gigantic and
seemingly impracticable task of bringing about a reformation. The means
which they proposed was the establishment of temperance societies, the
members of which bound themselves to total abstinence from spirituous
liquors. The scheme was considered as ridiculous; and even many who
beheld drunkenness with disgust smiled at the inadequate weapon with
which it seemed to them this monster vice was about to be attacked. But
God crowned their grain-of-mustard-seed-effort with gigantic success.
Societies on the plan of the parent-institution, and zealously
co-operating with it, sprang up in all parts of the Union. In September,
1832, there were in the state of New York alone, about 4,000 temperance
societies, of which one-thirtieth of the whole population were members.
And since that time the cause has progressed immensely. In 1841 there
were 2,000,000 pledged teetotallers, 15,000 whom were reformed
drunkards; and in 1846 about 5,000,000. In Maine, Massachusetts, New
York, Vermont, Maryland, Wisconsin and Michigan, legislative enactments
have first restrained, then prohibited, under pains and penalties, the
traffic in intoxicating liquors.
One other event, which occurred during the presidentship of John Quincy
Adams, and in which he took a very lively interest, must be
mentioned—the formation of the anti-masonic societies. The cause was
this: One William Morgan, a quiet, inoffensive man, a citizen of
Batavia, in Genesee County, New York, was about to publish a book,
disclosing, as was said, the secrets of Freemasonry. On the 11th of
September, 1826, it being then Sunday, this man was taken from his home,
his wife, and children, under colour of a criminal process, into Ontario
County, examined and discharged. The very same day, however, instead of
being allowed to return home, he was again arrested and thrown into jail
by the persons who brought the first charge against him. Again these
same people paid his debt, and immediately upon his issuing from prison,
which was then in the darkness of night, he was again seized, gagged,
and forced into a carriage, which was rapidly driven 150 miles, relays
of horses and carriages being prepared along the whole line of road, and
in this manner conveyed, as after inquiry showed, to the Canadian
frontier, lodged in solitary confinement within the walls of an old
fortress, and after five days was supposed to be transported, at the
dead of night, “to the wide channel of the Niagara river, by four royal
archcompanions and sunk to the bottom. Nine days were occupied in the
execution of this masonic sentence; and at least 300 worthy brethren and
companions of the order were engaged as principals or accessories in the
guilt of this cluster of crimes.”[79]
It was in vain that the legislature of New York passed an act ordering a
strict investigation of the subject. Although numerous persons were
proved to be implicated in the abduction, it was impossible to procure
any evidence of the manner in which the unfortunate man had been
destroyed. All that could be learnt was, that a body, said to be that of
Morgan, was found below Fort Niagara. It being impossible, therefore, to
bring forward testimony which would warrant a charge of murder, it was
resolved to prosecute on that of abduction. But here again insuperable
difficulties were thrown in the way by the masonic fraternity. Many
witnesses were removed out of reach, grand juries were packed,
intimidation exercised, and every art put in practice to insure impunity
to the criminals. And although in some instances convictions were
obtained, and the conspirators punished, all the chief actors managed to
set the law at defiance.
Morgan’s abduction, and the formidable influence which the masonic
fraternity was found to possess, in the attempt to convict for that
crime, excited extreme indignation and disgust against these secret and
powerful societies in the minds of the citizens of New York, who argued
that secret societies were not only dangerous, but incompatible with the
institutions of a republican government, that their oaths and mysteries
were illegal and immoral, and that the use of them must disqualify for
offices of public trust. A political party, called Anti-Masonic, soon
rose in the western part of the state, which acquired such great
influence that its leaders became members of the legislative body. The
example of New York was followed by the states of Vermont,
Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Maryland, Delaware, Ohio, and the territory of Michigan. But freemasonry
existed through it all.
About the time that the anti-masonic party began to decline, the
anti-slavery party arose. It still has its work to do; to battle with
oppression and crime a thousand times greater than that of freemasonry.
May God help the right!
The presidential election of 1828 was decided in favour of General
Jackson of Tennessee, with whose arbitrary and decisive military
movements we are already acquainted; and John Calhoun, of South
Carolina, was chosen vice-president. When, on the 4th of March, 1829,
Jackson assumed the reins of government, he found the country rich and
prosperous, at perfect peace with all nations, and having in the
national treasury a surplus of more than 5,000,000 dollars.
During the year 1828, congress enacted a tariff law, laying protective
duties on such imported articles as competed with certain manufactured
goods and agricultural products of the United States, by means of which
additional duties were laid on wool and woollen goods, iron, hemp and
its fabrics, distilled spirits, silk-stuffs, window-glass and cottons.
The manufacturing states were well pleased with this law, which,
however, was highly unsatisfactory to cotton-planters of the southern
states. This tariff law was the fertile source of agitation, and almost
revolution, during the presidentship of General Jackson.
In April of 1832, the Winnebagoes, Sacs, and Foxes, Indian tribes
inhabiting the upper Mississippi, commenced hostilities under their
celebrated chief, Black Hawk, re-entering the lands which had been sold
to the United States, and which were now occupied by the citizens of
Illinois. The so-called sale of Indian lands was frequently anything but
with the free-will of the red man, and, as in this very instance, the
Sac Indians were extremely unwilling to vacate their lands; but American
generals, of the same character as the president, unscrupulous and
resolute, not troubled either with too much conscience or too much
sensibility, were ever at hand ready to pledge themselves “within
fifteen days to remove the Indians, dead or alive, over to the west side
of the Mississippi.” The conduct of Black Hawk on this occasion is
worthy to be related. Gaines, the American general, rose in the council
of the chiefs, and said that the president was displeased with the
refusal of the Sacs to go to the west of the great river. Black Hawk
replied that the Sacs, of which he was the chief, had never sold their
lands, and were determined to hold them.
“Who is this Black Hawk? Is he a chief?” inquired the general. “What
right has he in the council?”
Black Hawk rose, and gathering his blanket round him, walked out of the
assembly. The next morning he was again in the council, and rising
slowly, said, addressing the American general: “My father, you inquired
yesterday, ‘Who is this Black Hawk? Why does he sit among the chiefs?’ I
will tell you who I am. I am a Sac; my father was a Sac; I am a warrior,
and so was my father. Ask those young men who have followed me to
battle, and they will tell you who Black Hawk is; provoke our people to
war, and you will learn who Black Hawk is.”
The people _were_ provoked to war, and the Americans learned to know
Black Hawk. He and his warriors came mounted and armed into the country
which they still claimed as their own, and broke up the settlements of
the white intruders, killing whole families and destroying their
dwellings. Generals Scott and Atkinson were sent out against them. But
an enemy more formidable than the red man went with them, and thinned
their ranks more remorselessly than the hatchet of the savage. This was
the cholera. The troops embarked in steamboats at Buffalo, and the
disease made its first appearance on board. Great numbers died; great
numbers also deserted on landing, and fled to the woods, where they
perished either from the disease or starvation. Scott was not able to
reach the scene of action. Atkinson, by forced marches, came up with
Black Hawk’s party on the 2nd of August, near the mouth of the Upper
Iowa. The Indians were routed and dispersed, and Black Hawk and his two
sons and several great warriors made prisoners. Nothing in the history
of humanity is much sadder than the putting down and destroying the last
remnants of these once powerful tribes. Driven out from their fertile
lands, thousands literally died of starvation; and if, as in the case of
the Sacs, they were headed by a chief of superior intellect, who could
not patiently submit to be uprooted like a weed from the soil of his
fathers, and who clung to it with a love as intense as that of the Swiss
for his mountains, then fire and sword swept him and his followers from
the land, and they were killed as traitors. God sees these things, and
permits them; nevertheless they are great iniquities. Black Hawk and his
sons were sent to Fort Jefferson, and put in irons; they were taken to
Washington, and had an interview with President Jackson, when a treaty
was concluded, and the captives relinquished all claim to their
territory, and consented to remove west of the Mississippi. After this
they were taken through several of the eastern cities, that they might
see the power and greatness of the whites, and how hopeless it was to
contend against them. Black Hawk ended his days on the Des Moines river,
where his people had settled. He had a bark cabin, which he furnished,
in imitation of the whites, with chairs, a table, a mirror, and
mattresses. He was no longer the great warrior; in the summer he is said
to have cultivated a few acres of land, on which he grew corn, melons,
and other vegetables. His last speech was at Fort Madison, on the 4th of
July, a festival to which he had been invited, and thus he spoke: “It
has pleased the Great Spirit that I am here to-day. I have eaten with my
white friends. The earth is our mother; we are now on it, with the Great
Spirit above us. It is good. I hope we are all friends here. A few
winters ago I was fighting against you. Perhaps I did wrong—but that is
past; it is buried—let it be forgotten. Rock River was a beautiful
country; I loved my towns, my corn-fields, and the home of my people. I
fought for it. It is now yours; keep it as we did; it will produce you
beautiful crops.”
Such was the spirit of the old, exiled Indian chief; he was a Christian
in practice, though not in name.
As the last chief of a once great and powerful people, we must be
allowed to say a few more words respecting Black Hawk, which we give
from the pen of one who knew him personally. “A deep-seated melancholy,”
says he, “was apparent in his countenance and conversation, and he spoke
occasionally of his former greatness with an inexpressible sadness,
representing himself as at one time master of the country north-east and
south of us. In the autumn of 1838 he set out for the frontier, where
payment was to be made to the tribe of a portion of their annuity. The
weather was both hot and wet, and he appears to have imbibed on his
journey the seeds of the disease which terminated his life. In October
the commission was to meet the tribes at Rock Island, but Black Hawk was
then too ill to accompany them. On the 3rd of October he died, after an
illness of seven days. His only medical attendant was one of the tribe
who knew something of vegetable antidotes. His wife, who was devotedly
attached to him, mourned deeply for him during his illness. She seemed
to have a presentiment of his approaching death, and said, ‘He is
getting old—he must die; Monotah is calling him home!’
“After his death, he was dressed in the uniform presented to him at
Washington, and placed upon a rude bier with bark laid across, on which
he was carried by four of his braves to the place of interment, followed
by his family and about fifty of the tribe, the chiefs being all absent.
They seemed deeply affected and mourned in their usual way, shaking
hands and muttering in gutteral tones prayers to Monotah for his safe
passage to the land prepared for the reception of all Indians. The grave
was six feet deep and of the usual length, situated upon a little
eminence about fifty yards from his wigwam. The body was placed in the
middle of the grave in a sitting posture, upon a seat constructed for
that purpose. On his left, the cane given him by Henry Clay was placed
upright, with his right hand resting upon it. Many of his old trophies,
his favourite weapons and some Indian garments were placed in the grave.
The whole was then covered with plank, and a mound of several feet in
height thrown over, and the whole enclosed with pickets twelve feet in
height. At the head of the grave was placed the American flag, and a
post was raised at the foot, on which, in Indian characters was
inscribed his age, which was about seventy-two.”
As an instance of the rapid growth of civilization in the wilderness of
the West, we will give a few sentences from the graphic pen of Judge
Hall, when speaking of this very region in the year of Black Hawk’s
death. “The country,” says he, “over which Black Hawk, with a handful of
followers, badly mounted and destitute of stores or munitions of war,
roamed for hundreds of miles, driving off the scattered inhabitants, is
now covered with flourishing settlements, with substantial houses and
large farms—not with the cabins and clearings of border-men, but with
the comfortable dwellings and the well-tilled fields of independent
farmers. Organised counties and all the subordination of social life are
there; and there are the noisy school-house, the decent church, the
mill, the country store, the fat ox and the sleek plough-horse. The
Yankee is there with his notions and his patent-rights, and the
travelling agent with his subscription book; there are merchandise from
India and from England, and in short all the luxuries of life. And all
this within six years. Six years ago the Indian warrior ranged over that
fertile region which is now covered with an industrious population,
while the territories of Wisconsin and Iowa and vast settlements in
Missouri have since grown up, beyond the regions which was then the
frontier and the seat of war.”
Such was the state of the West in 1832. Now in twenty years from that
time the white population has advanced still farther and farther
westward, removing at every step the Indian frontier. Iowa, Missouri and
Wisconsin have now taken their position as states of the Union, and
religion and education are establishing true civilization in the former
wilderness, and may atone to heaven for the wrongs done to the Indian on
this very soil.
But we must now return to the events of our general history.
The tariff bill, which passed into operation at the close of the session
of 1832, caused, as we have said, great excitement in the southern
states. South Carolina was the head-quarters of the opposition; and the
party adverse to the bill called themselves the State-rights party,
afterwards “nullifiers,” because having in November held a convention at
Columbia, they issued an ordinance in the name of the people, declaring
that congress had exceeded its powers in laying on protective duties,
and that all such acts should from that time be utterly _null_ and
_void_. And finally they declared, that should congress attempt by force
to bring their act into operation, the people would not submit; and that
any act of congress authorising the employment of a naval or military
force against the state, should be _null_ and _void_; and that in such
case the people would hold themselves absolved from any political
connexion with the other states, and would forthwith proceed to organise
a separate government, and do all other acts and deeds which a sovereign
and independent state has a right to do.
Further still; the legislature of South Carolina met on the 27th of
November, when Governor Hamilton gave in his concurrence to the
ordinance, and recommended that the authorities of the state and of the
city of Charleston should request the withdrawal of the United States
troops, which had been stationed there to guard against a slave
insurrection; that the militia should be called out, and provision made
for obtaining heavy ordnance and other munitions of war.
This novel doctrine, says Willson, of the right of a state to declare a
law of congress unconstitutional and void, and to withdraw from the
Union, was promptly met by a proclamation of the president, in which he
seriously warned the ultra-advocates of “States-rights” of the
consequences that must ensue if they persisted in their course of
treason to the government. He declared that, as chief-magistrate of the
Union, he could not, if he would, avoid the performance of his duty;
that the laws must be executed, and that any opposition to their
execution must be repelled if necessary by force.
This proclamation was extremely popular, and was supported even in South
Carolina, where there existed a strong party called “Friends of the
Union.” Party animosities were for the moment forgotten throughout the
States, and all united in agreeing to support the president in asserting
the supremacy of the laws. Nor did the president talk only; with his
usual prompt decision he caused Castle Pinckney, a fortress which
commands the inner harbour of Charleston, as well as the town, to be put
in complete order of defence; strongly garrisoned Fort Moultrie, and
ordered several ships of war to be stationed in the bay. Every one saw
that he was in earnest, and even the most violent nullifiers shrunk back
from a contest against the whole nation with a man like General Jackson
at its head.
Fortunately for the peace of the nation, the cause of discord and
discontent was in great measure removed by a compromise bill, introduced
into congress by Henry Clay. This bill was for modifying the tariff, and
ultimately reducing the duties to a proper standard. It was strongly
opposed by the supporters of the manufacturing interests, but
nevertheless, having passed both the House of Representatives and the
Senate, received the president’s signature early in March, 1833. It was,
however, accompanied by an act which provided for the collection of
duties on imports, and was called the Enforcing Bill, which was strongly
objected to as giving the president an almost unlimited power over
commerce. On the 4th of March, 1833, General Jackson entered his second
presidential term, Martin Van Buren, of New York, being elected
vice-president. Very soon after the re-election of President Jackson, a
great excitement was occasioned on account of the removal from the Bank
of the United States of the government funds deposited there, and their
transfer to certain state banks. The opponents of the administration
censured this measure as an unauthorised and dangerous assumption of
power by the executive; and the public confidence in the moneyed
institutions of the country being shaken, the pecuniary distresses of
1836 and 1837 were charged upon the hostility of the president to the
Bank of the United States; while, on the other hand, these very
distresses were ascribed to the management of the bank, which the
president declared to have become “the scourge of the country.”[80]
Again the pent-up and out-driven Indian tribes making, as it were, a
dying effort to save themselves, rose into rebellion, and the story
again is very sad. The Chickasaws and the Choctaws had, during the last
few years, quietly emigrated west of the Mississippi, into the territory
bordering on Arkansas, which had been allotted to them instead of their
own lands, and as an inducement to remove voluntarily, the United States
had paid the expenses of their journey, and supplied them with a year’s
provisions. Other tribes there were, however, who were not so easily
managed, and it is of their struggles to maintain a footing on their own
lands that we have now to speak. The Cherokees were the most civilised
of the Indian tribes; they had an established government, a national
legislature, and written laws. Their rights had been protected during
the administration of John Quincy Adams, against the claims of Georgia.
Under the administration, however, of the unscrupulous and aggressive
General Jackson, the legislature of Georgia, which acted very much in
the spirit of the president, extended its laws over the Indian territory
comprised within their boundaries, and among other severe enactments it
was declared, that “no Indian nor the descendants of an Indian, residing
within the Creek or Cherokee nation of Indians, should be deemed a
competent witness or party to any suit, in any court where a white man
is a defendant.” It was in vain that the Supreme Court of the United
States protested against these acts as unconstitutional. Georgia
persisted in its hard enactments, and President Jackson informed the
alarmed and anxious Cherokees that “he had no power to oppose the
sovereignty of any state over all who may be within its limits.” Their
case was precisely as if a fly, caught in a spider’s web, had appealed
for deliverance to another spider, when the advice would have been that
of President Jackson to the Cherokees—“they must abide the issue,
without any hope that he would interfere.”
They did abide the issue, until, worn out by oppressions and vexations,
some of their chiefs were induced to sign a treaty of evacuation. In
vain the Cherokees as a nation protested against it; lived quietly and
inoffensively; availed themselves of the civilisation of the whites, and
wished to profit by it; they were still the red men, the aborigines of
the forest, and they must become once more dwellers in the wilderness.
There was no help for them. Their general emigration was decided upon in
1835, but it was not effected until three years later.
The same year in which the removal of the Cherokees was decided, the
Seminole Indians of Florida began to resist the settlement of the whites
in their vicinity, the immediate cause of their hostility being again an
attempt to remove them west of the Mississippi. In September, 1823, soon
after the purchase of Florida by the United States, a treaty had been
made with the Seminoles, by which they relinquished their claims to
large tracts, reserving certain portions to themselves for residence.
The terms of this treaty being disputed, a second was made at Payne’s
Landing, in Florida, in 1832, when it was stipulated that the Seminoles
should relinquish their reservation, and remove west of the Mississippi,
a delegation of their chiefs being sent out at the expense of the United
States to examine the country assigned to them, whither the Creeks were
already gone; and, according to the treaty, if it were found that they,
the Creeks, would live amicably with them, and that the country was
agreeable to them, then the treaty should be binding. The report of the
delegates was not satisfactory. The country which was assigned to them
was of a stern character, unlike that of their native Florida; it
produced no light-wood for fuel, which was easy to fell, and to which
the Seminoles were accustomed. The savage wilderness of Nebraska did not
allure them; and the Indians, they reported, were bad; they preferred to
remain in Florida, and they accordingly maintained that the treaty was
not binding. Macanopy, their king, opposed their removal, and Osceola,
their most celebrated chief, said that he “wished to rest in the land of
his fathers, and for his children to sleep by his side.”
But the wishes of Macanopy and Osceola were as nothing beside the will
of President Jackson; and General Wiley Thompson was sent as the
government agent to Florida, to arrange the removal of the Seminoles.
Thompson reported that the Seminoles were unwilling to emigrate, and
received for reply that they must go; that his military force should be
increased, and that the annuities which the Seminoles received under the
treaty of 1823 should not be paid until they consented to leave the
country. The Seminoles took council together and promised to go the
following spring; and Thomson, writing to the president, said, “I
believe that the whole nation will come into this measure, but it is
impossible not to feel a deep interest and much sympathy for this
people.”
But when the spring came, and government measures began to be put in
operation for their removal, the heart of the whole people was roused as
one man, and they declared that they “could not leave their homes and
the graves of their fathers.” This persistance in opposition was
attributed to Osceola, whose bearing was proud and gloomy, and by order
of General Thompson he was put in irons. Dissembling his wrath, Osceola
obtained his liberty, and not only gave his consent to the removal of
the whole nation, but so completely won the confidence of the government
agent as to be entrusted with various commissions in different parts of
the country, which he executed faithfully. In the meantime, however, he
was concerting with the Indians a plan of deep revenge, which in the
month of December began to take effect.
The remainder of this mournful history we will briefly relate from
Marcius Willson. “At this time General Clinch was stationed at Fort
Orange in Florida. Being supposed to be in danger from the Indians, and
also in want of supplies, Major Dade was despatched from Fort Brooke, at
the head of Tampa Bay, with upwards of 100 men, to his assistance. He
had proceeded about half that distance, when he was suddenly attacked by
the enemy, and he and all but four of his men were killed; and those
four, horribly mangled, afterwards died of their wounds. At the time of
Dade’s massacre, Osceola with a small band of warriors was prowling in
the vicinity of Fort King. While General Thompson and a few friends were
dining at a store only 250 yards from the fort, they were surprised by a
sudden discharge of musketry, and five out of nine were killed. The body
of General Thompson was found pierced with fifteen bullets. Osceola and
his party rushed in, scalped the dead, and retreated before they could
be fired upon by the garrison.
“Two days later, General Clinch engaged the Indians on the banks of the
Withlacoochee, and in February of the following year, General Gaines,
the commander of the north-western division, was attacked near the same
place. In May, several of the Creek towns and tribes joined the
Seminoles in the war. Murders and devastations were frequent; the
Indians obtained possession of many of the southern mail-routes in
Georgia and Alabama, attacked steamboats, destroyed stages, burned
several towns, and compelled thousands of the whites, who had settled in
their territory, to flee for their lives. A strong force, however,
joined by many friendly Indians, being sent against them, and several of
the hostile chiefs having being taken, the Creeks submitted; though such
was their desperation, that many Indian mothers killed their children
rather than that they should become prisoners to the pale-faces. During
this summer great numbers were transported west of the Mississippi.
“In October, Governor Call took command of the forces in Florida, and
with nearly 2,000 men marched into the interior, when several
engagements took place.”
The time for the election of president being now come, Martin Van Buren
was chosen, and Richard M. Johnson, of Kentucky, vice-president. The war
in Florida, though it still raged, was for the time disregarded, owing
to the monetary and mercantile distresses of the country, which reached
their crises almost immediately after the accession of Van Buren. And
yet so prosperous had the country been, only in the preceding June, that
a large amount of surplus revenue had accumulated, which was given up to
the people, and distributed in three instalments among the several
states in proportion to their respective representations in congress.
While this extraordinary prosperity lasted, there was a perfect frenzy
of speculation; hundreds made immense fortunes, and tens of thousands
were reduced to want. During the months of March and April of 1837, the
failures in the city of New York alone amounted to nearly 100,000,000
dollars. The great extent of the business operations of the country, and
their intimate connexion with each other, caused the evil to extend into
all channels of trade. It was felt from the highest to the lowest. The
third instalment of the surplus revenue, which we have already
mentioned, having not yet been paid to the different states, was now
applied to the necessities of government; but no means of relief were
attempted for the people, it being contended that the case did not call
for governmental interference, but a reformation in individual
extravagance and a return to the old neglected ways of industry. A
destructive fire in New York, which occurred at the close of 1835, and
the loss by which was estimated at 17,000,000 dollars, added to the
present distress.
Nevertheless _growth_, which is the principle of American life, went on.
In September, 1835, Wisconsin was erected into a territory, and Arkansas
into a state; and now, in the midst of the general distress, Michigan
was admitted into the Union, making the twenty-sixth state; the original
number of thirteen being doubled.
We must now resume and conclude our account of the Seminole war, which
at this critical moment added to the expenses of the nation; while the
climate of a country abounding in swamps and marshes, amid which the war
was carried on, proved more fatal to the whites than even the Indians
themselves. After several encounters early in the season, a number of
chiefs came to the camp of General Jessup, and signed a treaty, by which
hostilities were to cease, and the Seminoles engaged to remove beyond
the Mississippi. But again the war broke out, and Osceola being
suspected as the cause, was seized in the month of October, when, with
several other chiefs and about seventy warriors, he arrived under the
protection of a flag of truce at the American camp. This was the
finishing stroke to the misfortunes of the Seminoles. It was a base
action; but the treachery of Osceola was pleaded in its palliation. The
Indian chief was now in the safe custody of the pale-faces, but the
strength of the Seminoles was not yet broken. He was confined in Fort
Moultrie, on Sullivan’s Island, opposite Charleston. Though a captive,
he was not treated with unkindness. He was visited by the principal
people of Charleston, and all was done for him which could render him
comfortable, but his spirit was broken. It is related by one gentleman
who visited him frequently, that the expression of his countenance was
the most melancholy that could be conceived. He, however, is said never
to have uttered any lamentation, although he often spoke with bitterness
of the manner in which he had been taken prisoner, and of the injustice
which had been done to his people. His person was handsome, his voice
melodious, and his eyes filled with a gloomy fire.
Although his bearing and his fate awoke, as we have said, a universal
interest for him, and Mr. Edin in particular, who felt an enthusiasm for
the handsome and unhappy Seminole chief, brought him presents, he was
indifferent to all; he grew more and more silent, and from the moment
when he was put in prison his health declined, though he did not appear
to be ill. He ate very little and refused all medicine. The captive
eagle could not live when deprived of the free life and air of his
forest.[81]
Osceola was a captive, but his people were not quelled. They, however,
after they lost his leadership, strove not so much to maintain a hold on
their country as to fight out the quarrel with their enemies.
Accordingly, for three years more the war went on. In 1839, General
Macomb, who had assumed the chief command of the army, induced a number
of chiefs in the southern part of the peninsula again to sign a treaty
of peace. By this treaty they were permitted to remain in the country
until they could be assured of the prosperity of their friends, who had
already emigrated. Again the treaty was broken, and in June of that year
the territorial government offered 200 dollars for every Indian, dead or
alive; and thus a war of extermination having begun, was continued till
the year 1842.
In 1837, a patent was granted to S. F. B. Morse, for the Electric
Telegraph.
The census of 1840 gave the population of the United States as
17,068,666.
The Democratic or Whig party succeeded, in the following election, in
returning William Henry Harrison, “the hero of the Thames and the
Tippacanoe,” as president, in opposition to Van Buren, and John Tyler,
of Virginia, as vice-president. On March 4th, 1841, Harrison was
inaugurated, and exactly one month afterwards, his health being feeble,
he expired; when the vice-president, according to the Constitution,
became president.
Monetary affairs were at this time engrossing public attention, and so
great were the present pecuniary difficulties, involving many mercantile
houses in ruin, that congress adopted the extraordinary expedient of
passing a bankrupt law, which operated throughout all the states. And
not only did this law become available for individuals, but was taken
advantage of by various states themselves, and a great obloquy for the
time was cast on the nation—this was called _repudiation_. With
returning prosperity, however, most of the states resumed payment, and
little, if any state repudiation of debt has remained.
In 1842, a long existing dispute between the United States and England,
regarding the north-eastern boundary, was adjusted. Lord Ashburton was
sent from England as a special envoy, and Daniel Webster and he arranged
the terms of a treaty by which this important question of north-eastern
boundary, which had even threatened war, was amicably and finally
settled.
In 1844, serious disturbances occurred in the state of New York, called
the Anti-Rent Disturbances, of which a few words must be permitted us,
and which we will give principally from Mrs. Willard.
“In the early history of the state, we have seen, that under the Dutch
government certain settlers received patents of considerable portions of
land, that of Van Renssalaer being the most extensive, comprehending the
greater part of Albany and Renssalaer counties. These lands were divided
into farms, containing from one hundred to one hundred and sixty acres,
and leased in perpetuity on the following conditions. The tenant must
each year pay to the landlord or ‘patron,’ a quantity of wheat, from
twenty-two-and-a-half bushels to ten, with four fat fowls, and a day’s
service with wagon and horses. If the tenant sold his lease, the
landlord was entitled to one-quarter of the purchase money. The landlord
was also entitled to certain privileges on all water power, and a right
to all mines. In process of time the tenants began to consider these
legal conditions as anti-republican, as a relic of feudal tyranny.
Stephen Van Renssalaer, who came into possession of his patent in 1780,
had in the kindness of his nature omitted to exact his legal right until
200,000 dollars of back rent was owing, which, on his death in 1840, was
found appropriated by will. The enforcement of these long-neglected
demands gave rise to much dissatisfaction, and finally they were
forcibly resisted, when the States’ government called out the military,
but still to no purpose.
“In the summer of 1844, the anti-rent disturbances broke out with great
violence in the eastern towns of Renssalaer, and in the Livingston Manor
in Columbia County. The anti-renters formed themselves into associations
to resist the law, and armed and trained bands, disguised as Indians,
scoured the country, compelling every person whom they met to give in
their allegiance to this revolt, by saying ‘Down with the Rent!’ Not
contented with this, they proceeded to violence, and tarring and
feathering, and other outrages of the most fearful kind took place.
Sometimes a thousand of these pretended Indians, more fearful even than
the real ones, assembled in a body. Similar disturbances occurred at the
same time in Delaware, where Steele, the deputy sheriff, was murdered in
the execution of his official duties.
“In 1846, Silas Wright was chosen governor of the state, and by his
wisdom and firmness the public order was restored. On the 27th of
August, he proclaimed the county of Delaware in a state of insurrection;
resolute men were made sheriffs, military aid was given, and the leading
anti-renters taken and brought to trial. The murderers of Steele were
condemned to death, but their punishment commuted to perpetual
imprisonment.”
March 3rd, 1845, the two former territories of Iowa and Florida were
admitted as states into the Union.
CHAPTER XXII.
WAR WITH MEXICO.—ANNEXATION OF TEXAS.—VAST INCREASE OF TERRITORY.—THE
MORMONS.
We have already related how the adventurous La Salle, when endeavouring
to establish a colony at the mouth of the Mississippi, mistook his
reckoning, and entered the bay of Matagorda instead. This gave the
French nation a claim to Texas. The fort built by the unfortunate La
Salle was soon demolished by the Indians, and the Spaniards from their
neighbouring Mexico disputed also the French right of possession, they
claiming the whole of this coast as a portion of their own territory.
The first permanent settlement of the whites in Texas was by the
Spaniards, in 1684, when, under San Antonio de Bexar, the fort of that
name was established. In 1719 also a colony settled there from the
Canary Isles. Various missionary stations and military posts were also
established at different places, so that the Spaniards became the
assured possessors of the country, with an increasing population. The
missionary stations, unlike the simple log-huts and chapels of the early
French jesuits, were massive fortresses of stone, the churches decorated
with images of saints and paintings, and surmounted by enormous towers.
The ruins of several of these vast erections still remain in various
parts of Texas, and produce a very striking effect, especially in a
country where the traces of civilised life are so scanty. The Spanish
population of Texas was, however, inconsiderable at the time of the
Mexican revolution in 1810, owing to the incursions of the savage
Comanches and other Indian tribes, and to the police regulations of the
Spanish government. As regards the relative positions and feelings of
the Mexican government and that of the United States, we will give a few
remarks from an American writer.[82] “The Mexican authorities were not
so desirous of occupying Texas as of keeping her a desolate waste; that
she might present an impassable barrier between themselves and their
Anglo-American neighbours. The cause of this is not of difficult
solution, and is derived from the old mother-country. At the time when
Mexico was first colonised, Spain was at the head of the Roman Catholic
countries, and all heretics were held in abhorrence by her, and
exterminated by the inquisition and the sword. The changes which
knowledge and general enlightenment have produced in the Protestant
world universally, and even in the Catholic when it has been forced into
closer contact with progressive opinion, have not reached Mexico, which
has been shut up as it were, and which has jealously retained all her
native aversions, prejudices and jealousies. Besides which, Mexico as a
colony belonged less to the Spanish nation than to the Spanish kings,
and was governed by their viceroys, regardless of the well-being of the
people, merely as an estate to produce a revenue. No possible rivalry
with the mother-country was permitted; meanwhile the mines were
industriously worked, no commerce was permitted to the Mexicans, nor
might they rear the silkworm or plant the olive or the vine.
“When, however, the English colonies asserted and established their own
independence, Spain, fearing a similar revolt in her own colony,
somewhat relaxed her laws regarding their trade with foreign nations,
but only under severe restrictions and enormous duties, so that the
freedom on the one hand might be nullified by the restrictions on the
other. Very little change took place in Mexico.
“At length, in 1810, when the Spanish nation fell under the arm of
Napoleon, the Mexicans revolted. But the people were not united, and
after a war of eight years the Royalist party prevailed. A second
revolution took place in 1821, under Iturbide, when the Mexicans
succeeded in throwing off the Spanish yoke. Iturbide proclaimed himself
king, and the people, wishing for a republic, deposed him; he was
banished, and returning was executed. A new leader arose in the person
of Santa Anna, under whose auspices Mexico was divided into States, with
each a legislature, and over the whole a general government with a
federal constitution similar to that of the United States. But Santa
Anna was not a second Washington; the constitution became subverted, and
he the military tyrant of the country.”
Having given this brief sketch of the condition and government of
Mexico, we now return to Texas. When, in 1803, the United States
purchased Louisiana from France, the disputed claim to Texas became
transferred to them, and in 1819, when Florida was granted to them by
Spain, they ceded to that country their claims to Texas as a portion of
Mexico. But although they had resigned their claim to Texas, the United
States could not resist their natural impulse at extension and
colonisation, and, in 1821, favoured by the Mexican authorities, who
hoped that the bold and determined Anglo-American settler would be a
good defence against the hostile Comanches, the first attempt at the
colonisation of Texas was successfully made. The intended leader of this
movement was Moses Austen, of Durham, in Connecticut, who obtained a
grant of land from the Mexican authorities for the settlement of a
colony between the rivers Brazas and Colorado. Death prevented Moses
Austen from carrying out his plans, which, however, were fully and most
successfully executed by his son, Steven F. Austen. The success of
Austen’s colony soon alarmed the Mexican authorities; and well it might,
for these sturdy republicans once planted there would soon take such
firm root as to displace any other possessor. Nor was it long before
evidences of their intentions were apparent. In 1827, a movement was
attempted by the settlers of Nacogdoches to throw off the Mexican yoke
and to establish a republic under the name of Fredonia. The attempt was
unsuccessful, but the Mexican authorities were alarmed, more especially
as soon after some overtures were made on the part of the United States
government to purchase Texas.
In 1833, there were about 10,000 American settlers in Texas; and at that
time dissatisfaction and discontent were prevailing largely among them.
The Spanish Mexicans of the province carried against them every measure
in the government, and when Steven Austen was sent to the city of Mexico
to petition for redress, he was first neglected, and then thrown into a
dungeon. In 1835 Austen was once more in Texas. The usurpations of Santa
Anna had in the meantime increased the public discontent, and the
Texians generally prepared to throw off the yoke of his despotism.
Adventurers from the American states hastened to take part in the
approaching contest, which sooner or later was sure to be advantageous
to their nation. A provisional government was appointed, and Samuel
Houston placed at the head of the army in Texas.
In December the Texian forces, under General Burleton, besieged the
strong fortress of Alamo and the city of Bexar, which was garrisoned by
General Cos and 1,300 Spaniards and Mexicans. In a few days the fortress
was taken, and the Mexicans obtained permission to retire; so that
within a very short time not a single Mexican soldier remained east of
the Rio Grande.
Santa Anna, who understood too well the spirit of the people, no sooner
saw the stronghold of Bezar taken by a party whose purposes were so
adverse to his own, than he entered Texas in person, and with 4,000 men
invested Goliad and Bezar, which had unfortunately been left in the
hands of a very inadequate force. The attack commenced and continued for
several days, the fortress of the Alamo in Bezar being defended by its
little band with a courage, says Samuel Goodrich, worthy of Leonidas and
his Spartans. After having held out for a considerable time they
sustained a general assault on the night of the 6th of May. They fought
until Travis, their commander, fell, and seven only of the garrison were
left when the place was taken, and the little remnant was torn to
pieces. Two human beings only were left, a woman and a negro servant.
Among those who fell on this terrible occasion was the celebrated David
Crockett of Tennessee, a man well known from the eccentricity of his
mind and the independence of his character; he was found surrounded by a
heap of dead whom he had slain.
Colonel Fanning, who commanded at Goliad, by direction of the Texian
authorities evacuated this place on the 17th of March, but had scarcely
reached the open country when they were surrounded by the Mexicans with
a troop of Indian allies. They defended themselves all day, and killed a
great number of the enemy; during the night, however, the Mexicans being
reinforced, they were obliged to surrender, on condition of being
treated as prisoners of war: good faith, however, was unknown to Santa
Anna, and no sooner were they in his power than he ordered them to be
drawn out and shot. Four hundred men were thus murdered in cold blood;
one of the soldiers saying to his fellows, when the inhuman order was
given, “They are going to shoot us; let us face about and not be shot in
the back.” This bloody tragedy, which stamped the name of Santa Anna
with infamy, took place on the 27th of March, 1836.
These direful tidings aroused, at the same time, the American hatred and
sympathy. After this they would not permit Texas to remain in the hands
of so cruel and false an enemy.
Santa Anna, encouraged by his victory and confident of success, pursued
the Texian army, now under the command of General Houston, as far as San
Jacinto, where Houston resolved to risk a battle, although his force was
less than 1,000 and the enemy double his number. This was on the 21st of
April. The Texians commenced the attack, rushing furiously forward to
within half-rifle distance, with the ominous battle-cry of “Remember the
Alamo!” The fury with which they assailed the enemy was irresistible,
and in less than half an hour they were masters of the camp, the whole
Mexican army being killed, wounded, or prisoners. The following day
Santa Anna himself was taken, without arms and in disguise.
The plausibility of this artful leader induced his captors to believe
him favourable to the independence of Texas. At his request he was sent
to the United States, and had an interview with President Jackson, whom
he succeeded also in winning, and by whom he was permitted to return to
Mexico. No sooner in Mexico than he disclaimed his late proceedings and
again commenced war on Texas. In the meantime the United States, England
and France recognised the independence of that country. But her struggle
was not at an end; and gaining strength by the contest, the Texians, in
1841, assisted by a body of American adventurers, proceeded to take
possession of Santa Fe, the capital of New Mexico, lying on the eastern
side of the Rio Grande. This attempt was unsuccessful, but it opened, as
it were, a door into New Mexico, and the American foot being once
planted there, as elsewhere, was but the forerunner of possession.
In 1844 Texas made application to be received into the American Union.
Great discussion followed; both President Jackson and his successor, Van
Buren, opposed it, on the ground of the existing peaceful relations with
Mexico, but the great body of the American people were favourable to it.
The question of annexation was made the great test question of the
following election, and James Polk and George M. Dallas owed their
elections to its support. Accordingly, on the 4th of March, 1844, they
were inaugurated, and Texas already in February had been admitted into
the Union. The annexation of Texas was of course resented by Mexico, her
minister at Washington declaring it to be “the most unfair act ever
recorded in history.”
The conditions of annexation required from the authorities and people of
Texas were as follows: 1st. That all questions of boundary should be
settled by the United States; 2nd. That Texas should give up her
harbours, magazines, etc., but retain her funds and her debts, and,
until their discharge, her unappropriated lands; 3rd. That additional
new states, not exceeding four, might be formed _with slavery_ if south
of lat. 36½°, but if north, _without_.
The annexation of Texas led to war with Mexico. In July an armed force
under Colonel Zachery Taylor, was sent out to protect the new territory
against the threatened invasion of Mexico, besides which negotiations
were opened for the adjustment of the quarrel, the United States being
desirous of purchasing a peaceful boundary on the Rio Grande and the
cession of California.
Whilst these negotiations were pending with but little hope of a
successful termination, a difficulty arose between the United States and
England respecting the northern boundary of Oregon. The brief history of
this north-western state is as follows. In the spring of 1792, Captain
Robert Gray, of Boston, discovered a river to which he gave the name of
his vessel, the Columbia. This was the first knowledge which the
Americans had of this river. In 1804–5, Messrs. Lewis and Clarke, under
the commission of the American government, explored this river from its
mouth to its source. After the year 1808, the country was occupied by
various fur companies. These are the circumstances upon which the United
States based her claims to the territory as far as 54° 40′. But English
merchants being settled in the country, England also asserted her claim,
and a discussion of rights and claims ensued, which became so hot on
both sides as even to threaten war between the two countries.
Fortunately, however, the question was amicably adjusted by the treaty
of 1846, by which the 49th degree became the frontier of the United
States to the north, Vancouver’s Island was wholly relinquished to the
British, to whom also the right of navigation in the Columbia was
conceded.
War with Mexico continued through the whole of 1846–47, and in May of
the following year, left the Americans in quiet possession of the
northern provinces of Mexico proper, a vast and important territory
including New Mexico, Utah, and California. The incidents of the war
were of an adventurous and romantic character. The wonderfully varied
and tropical character of the country, and the wild and guerilla kind of
warfare amid scenes rendered memorable in the old chivalrous days of
Spanish glory and enterprise, gave an extraordinary charm to a war which
perhaps cannot be justified on strict principles of Christian morality.
Young adventurers flocked to the armies of Generals Wool, Kearney, and
Taylor, impatient to take part in a enterprise which was dangerous and
exciting in the highest degree. It is said that when the news of the
imminent danger of the army on the Rio Grande reached the United States,
that everywhere young men hastened westward to defend their brethren,
fight the Mexicans, and push forward for the Halls of the Montezumas;
and that Prescott’s work, the “History of the Conquest of Mexico,” being
just then published and universally read, greatly increased the
enthusiasm.
In April, 1847, Peubla, the second city in Mexico, was taken by the
Americans under General Scott, and in the following September, the grand
city of Mexico itself. “Three hours before noon,” says Mrs. Willard, who
seems to have the strongest sympathy with this war, “General Scott made
his entrance, with escort of cavalry and flourish of trumpets, into the
conquered city of the Aztecs. The troops for four-and-twenty hours now
suffered from the anarchy of Mexico more than her prowess had been able
to inflict. Two thousand convicts let loose from the prisons attacked
them from the house-tops, at the same time entering houses and
committing robberies. The Mexicans assisting, these fellows were quelled
by the morning of the 15th.
“General Scott gave to his army, on the day of their entrance into
Mexico, memorable orders concerning their discipline and behaviour.
After directing that companies and regiments be kept together, he says,
‘Let there be no disorders, no straggling, no drunkenness. Marauders
shall be punished by court-martial. All the rules so honourably observed
by the glorious army in Peubla must be observed here. The honour of our
country, the honour of our army, call for the best behaviour from all.
The valiant must, to win the approbation of God and their country, be
sober, orderly, and merciful. His noble brethren in arms will not be
deaf to this hasty appeal from their commander and friend.’
“On the 16th, he called the army to return public and private thanks to
God for victory; and on the 19th, for the better preservation of order
and suppression of crime, he proclaimed martial law. Thus protected by
the American army, the citizens of Mexico were more secure from
violence, and from the fear of robbery and murder, than they had ever
been under their own flag.”
Nor does this statement appear to be overdrawn. An English writer[83] on
Mexico, who was in the country the two years following the war, dates
the commencement of an improvement in this degraded people from the
American invasion. “Nothing,” says he, “could exceed the jealous
suspicions with which the Mexicans formerly regarded other nations, more
particularly perhaps the people of the United States. The hatred and
rancour with which the very name of American was mentioned while
hostilities were in progress, were immeasurable. But at the present time
kindly feelings are being fostered with a large proportion which will
lead to happy results for both countries.
“In respect of the broad principles of commerce, productions and
restrictions, the intercourse of Mexico with other nations has at
present led to but few salutary results. Exclusiveness and shortsighted
suspicion still remain the governing features of their commercial
policy; liberality, innovation, and improvement, being carefully guarded
against. Foreign productions of importance are excluded as ruinous, and
the country is effectually protected against honourable traffic, though
left open to the lawless proceedings of swindlers and smugglers of every
grade.
“When the Americans marched upon the interior of the country,” after
gaining every battle on the outskirts, said an intelligent Mexican, who
had been seized upon by the American army and compelled to serve as a
guide, “the most horrible ideas of their cruelty and rapacity were set
afloat. As they drew near the capital, we were given to understand that
there was no torture nor disgrace to which they would not subject the
inhabitants, if they conquered us. The priests made themselves
particularly busy in influencing the minds of the people in every part
of the city against them, and members of the secular clergy went from
house to house of the wealthier classes, to arouse their zeal against
the invaders, and to procure sums of money for the benefit of the cause.
It was generally believed that our enemies were neither more nor less
than a kind of monsters, permitted by heaven to visit us as a judgment
upon our crimes and neglect of the holy church.
“‘For my own part such a dreadful idea of our enemies had taken
possession of me, that I could neither eat nor sleep; I was like one
bereft of his senses; every avenue of my mind seemed closed but that of
fear. Sleeping or waking, I was haunted by the image of our invaders,
and I was in the act of making a precipitate retreat at the moment I was
surrounded by several hostile soldiers. But, above all, was a popular
horror associated with the American generals. The people were taught to
believe them the most atrocious impersonations of cruelty and rapacity
which it was possible to imagine. It was reported that they had sworn to
hang every Mexican who should fall into their hands, and that they had
approached the capital with the most malicious determination to wreak
their vengeance upon it.’ The Mexican prisoner related, therefore, that
when he found himself in the hands of such dreaded foes he was in
momentary expectation of being shot or hanged, and could not at first
understand why his execution was delayed. Still more was he astonished
when he beheld the American generals themselves. Instead of fierce
tyrants with bloodthirsty visages, as he had been taught to regard them,
he beheld, he said, two agreeable-looking, fair men, with paternal
countenances and amiable manners. General Scott made a good impression;
but General Taylor attracted by his unassuming dignity and awed by his
firmness.
“‘I am sure,’ continued this narrator, ‘that many of my countrymen have
a great respect for the people of the United States; they have reason
for it. Their officers were kind instead of cruel to us; they spared our
houses and our property; they were just to our storekeepers. Indeed, in
many respects, our city has had cause to regret the period when they
went away.’ The cruelties of the Mexicans in this struggle were of the
most unsparing character; every American or Texian who was captured was
killed in some ruthless manner, their dead and mangled bodies being left
to be recognised by their friends. It was their practice,” says Mr.
Mason, “to extort by the most brutal threats and unlicensed conduct, the
money and property of individuals unfortunate enough to be in their
vicinity, or failing this to outrage their families, or sacrifice them
to their mean revenge. They exhibited the utmost baseness and duplicity
in all attempts at compromise and interchange of prisoners; and they
stripped and plundered the bodies of the American dead left on the field
of battle, burning and disfiguring them in the most brutal manner.
“The generosity of the American general shines in happy contrast with
these deeds of their enemies. A large party of wounded Mexicans were
left in the hospital totally unprovided for on the retreat of Santa
Anna’s army from Buena Vista, where the Americans gained a signal
victory in February, 1847, and which in fact made them masters of the
northern provinces of Mexico Proper. In the disastrous flight which
followed this defeat, hundreds of the wounded were left by the wayside
to be drowned by the waters, even before death, and numbers who had
escaped unscathed in the battle, perished on the march in the agonies of
thirst and hunger. On General Taylor becoming acquainted with the fact,
he despatched such medical assistance as he could spare, together with
between thirty and forty mules laden with provisions, to their
assistance. This, it is said, being only one instance out of many that
might be recorded to the credit of the Americans.” And no more than what
is right; for the Americans, though chargeable with an aggressive spirit
in many cases, with a greed of territory and a lust of colonisation,
like their old Anglo-Norman ancestors, were yet Christians, and it is by
this Christianity alone, which the conqueror must never forego, that the
citizens of the United States will in process of time extend themselves
over the whole of the western hemisphere.
We have heard above the testimony of a Mexican to the character of the
American invaders. And as regards the moral state of Mexico, we will
give an average statement of the amount of crime for one year in the
city of Mexico, the population of which is but little above 130,000:
MALES. FEMALES. TOTAL.
Robbery 1,800 590 2,390
Quarrelling and Wounding 2,937 1,805 4,742
Bigamy, etc. 421 203 624
Homicide 180 42 222
Incontinence, etc. 75 37 112
Forgery 11 3 14
Throwing Vitriol 41 17 58
Lesser Crimes 734 341 1,075
—————
9,237
Besides which, about 900 dead bodies are found in the streets and
suburbs annually, the cause of which is never known and rarely inquired
into. In the above list of crimes is found vitriol throwing, which
probably is new to some of our readers, but is so common in Mexico, as
the above author assures us, that its appalling evidences are frequently
visible in the streets; and not only among the lower classes, but among
the wealthy, who have fallen victims to the demoniac vengeance of these
ignorant and brutal people.
The taking of Mexico was the crisis of the war. But though the enemy’s
capital was in the hands of the Americans, they made use of their
conquest for no other purpose than to establish peace. In vain Santa
Anna endeavoured to carry on the war; his power was gone for the
present, and in October, being abandoned by his troops, he once more
became a fugitive. In the following February a treaty was laid before
congress, and on the 29th of May, the treaty being signed between the
two nations, peace was declared to the American army in Mexico.
The stipulations of the treaty were, that Mexico should be evacuated
within three months, prisoners on each side released, and Mexican
captures made by the Indians within the limits of the United States were
to be restored. These limits, as they affect Mexico, begin at the mouth
of the Rio Grande, and proceed thence along the deepest channel of that
river to the southern boundary of New Mexico. From thence to the Pacific
they follow the river Gela and the southern boundary of Upper
California. The United States might, however, navigate the Colorado
below the entrance of its affluent the Gela. If it were found
practicable and judged expedient to construct a canal, road, or railway
along the Gela, both nations were to unite in its construction and
afterwards to participate in its advantages. The navigation of the river
to be obstructed by neither nation. Mexican citizens within the limits
of the relinquished territories of New Mexico and Upper California to be
allowed a year to make their selection whether they would continue
Mexican citizens and remove their property, for which every facility was
to be furnished, or whether they would remain and become citizens of the
United States. The United States stipulated to restrain the incursions
of all the Indian tribes within its limits against the Mexicans, and to
return all Mexican captives hereafter made by the Indians. In
consideration of territory gained, the United States government agreed
to pay to Mexico 15,000,000 dollars, and also to assume her debts to
American citizens to the amount of 3,500,000 more. Three millions were
paid down to Mexico at once, congress having the preceding winter placed
that sum in the hands of the president in anticipation of this
arrangement.
Thus was the contest ended, to the incalculable advantage of America,
and of Mexico likewise, though her benefit will lie in the nearer
proximity of a more enlightened government, free institutions, and an
advancing people.
The territory of Wisconsin was admitted into the American Union as a
state, in May, 1850.
A vast extent of country, as we have already said, fell into the hands
of the United States government, in consequence of its Mexican
conquests. An important portion of this was Utah, so called from the
tribe of Indians inhabiting it, and which was formed into a territorial
government as early as 1850. But this remarkable country, with its vast
mountain chains, its deserts, its affluent valleys, and its great Salt
Lake, together with its extraordinary people, the Mormons, deserve more
than a mere summary mention. The Rocky Mountains on the east and the
Sierra Nevada on the west, form the boundaries of Utah; besides these,
two lofty chains intersect the country from north-east to south-west.
The Great Basin, a considerable portion of which is sandy desert, is an
elevated valley, composing the western portion of Utah; it is in circuit
about 12,000 miles, and lies about 5,000 feet above the level of the
sea. The great valley of the Colorado, on the east, although not fully
explored, is said to be wonderfully fertile, abounding in wood, and
admirably fitted for the purposes of agriculture. Its northern portion,
and the whole district of the Great Salt Lake, are full of natural
beauties, and abundantly repay cultivation.
The Great Salt Lake is perhaps the most singular feature of Utah. Its
form is irregular, in extent it is about seventy miles, and contains
many islands. It is extremely salty, and so shallow as not to be
available for the purposes of navigation. Its western banks, intersected
by rivulets impregnated with salt and sulphur, are totally devoid of
vegetation, excepting such small shrubs as spring up among the
glittering saline particles, and here the mirage frequently displays its
fantastic show, as in the deserts of the East. Fresh water and green
turf are unknown through an extent of one hundred miles, while a coating
of solid salt incrusts the earth, upon which the mules pass as upon ice.
This lake never freezes. The river Utah, or the Jordan as it is called
by the Mormons, is a small river of fresh water which unites Lake Utah
to the Great Salt Lake. Lake Utah, thirty-five miles long, receives the
waters of a great number of fresh-water streams which descend from the
mountains, and keep the waters of this lesser lake fresh, although on
its southern limits a considerable vein of salt has been found imbedded
in the clay.
These lakes are about 4,000 feet above the level of the sea.
Lake Utah, as well as the rivers which flow into it, abounds with
excellent fish, which with the chase furnish a subsistence to the
Indians of this district.[84]
Into this singular region, with its snow-capped mountains, its elevated
valleys, its sandy deserts, and salt and sulphurous waters, came, in the
year 1848, a people whose social and religious system forms as singular
an anomaly in the midst of modern civilisation as the country itself
which they chose amid the more ordinary aspects of nature. These, as is
well known, are the Mormons.
The commencement of this sect was only eighteen years previous to the
great emigration westward, and has become an historical event. Joseph
Smith, the Mormon prophet, a man of low origin, a native of Palmyra in
the state of New York, pretended to have found written plates of gold,
which he also pretended to translate by miraculous inspiration, and gave
forth as the book of Mormon, representing himself to be a great prophet
of the latter day, a new Moses or Mahomet. The character of Smith
appears from his youth upwards to have been that of a religious
enthusiast, if not impostor. When only fourteen, during one of those
periods of religious excitement called revivals, he declared that he had
been favoured with a heavenly vision, in which two angelic personages
freed him from the power of the Enemy and forbade him to join himself to
any Christian sect. As he approached manhood he pretended to a knowledge
of the occult sciences, and used the divining rod in the discovery of
gold, at which period he was known as “Joe the Money-Digger.” The
greatest treasure, however, which came into his hand, whether by occult
knowledge or by angelic revelation, was, he said, the Book of Mormon,
though no one ever saw the golden plates on which he asserted that it
was written. As regards this so-called Book of Mormon, it is now
generally supposed to have been the production of one Solomon Spalding,
a Presbyterian minister, who, after various unsuccesses, wrote a tedious
work of fiction on the History of the North American Indians, as the
descendants of the patriarch Joseph, from the reign of Zedekiah to the
fifth century of the Christian era, and which purported to have been
buried by Mormon, its original compiler. This work, which never found a
publisher, some years after its author’s death fell by some means into
the hands of Sidney Higdon, an associate of Smith’s. The Book of Mormon
was published, and Joe Smith was impudently announced by it to be a
second Prophet and Saviour of mankind, who should establish a great Zion
in America. Ill-founded and absurd as his pretensions were, he soon
obtained an immense influence over the ignorant, not only in America but
in England, and his sect increased not by hundreds but thousands. The
principles of this sect are as yet but imperfectly understood. If,
however, they are to be inferred from their bible, they will be found
based on Christianity, whatever extravagances and impurities they may
have engrafted upon it. This book is said to contain, in the first
place, the whole of the Christian Bible, to which are added the writings
of later prophets, of whom Meroni and Mormon are asserted to be the
last. These give a more definite prophecy of Christ, but still adhere to
the details of his life as related by the Evangelists, but in no
instances propound any new religious doctrines or theory. The sect
asserts, however, that Joe Smith, being directly descended from these
later prophets, not only inherited their divine gifts, but was endowed
with the spiritual privilege of divine communication, which he had the
power of imparting to others; and that by means of these divine and
miraculous gifts he and his followers are brought into closer
communication with Christ than any other body of Christians.
While we must believe that these high pretensions of Joe Smith’s are
delusions if not imposture of the most daring kind, it is still an
interesting question what was the secret of the wonderful influence
which he possessed over such thousands in the present age, and by which
he was able not only to form them into a vast organised society, but
even after his death to leave them so firmly knit together that no sign
of dissolution appears amongst them. No doubt, however, but that Joe
Smith was an extraordinary man, however unprincipled, gifted with a
measure of that far-seeing power which assumes to be prophetic, and
possessed of that subtle influence which subdues to its dominion the
minds of all who are brought within its sphere, besides which he had
great knowledge of human nature, and framed his government upon a
hierarchical basis so as to enslave the multitude to a powerful
priesthood. As regards the prophetic gifts of their first leader, the
Mormons declare that Joe Smith distinctly foretold the time and manner
of his own death, so that when it occurred the sect, instead of being
disheartened and broken up, only regarded it as the accomplishment of a
divine ordination, as a testimony to the truth of their faith, and other
men of a like spirit with Smith took his place.
The Mormons, in the year 1838, established themselves and built a temple
at Kirtland in Ohio; they then removed into Michigan, afterwards into
Missouri, whence they were expelled on the charge of an attempt to
assassinate the governor. From Missouri they removed into Illinois,
whence they were again driven out by the inhabitants. In this last
state, however, they remained long enough to found a city called Nauvoo,
in which they built, upon the fine slope of a hill, a vast and
magnificent temple in a barbaric style of architecture, according as
they asserted, to directions laid down in the book of Mormon, the
effect, however, of which was extremely imposing. Mormonism was now
flourishing. The wealth and population of the community increased
greatly. Smith was not only Prophet and High Priest but Mayor of Nauvoo,
and even, it is said, offered himself as candidate for the Presidentship
of the Union. At Nauvoo also it was that the grossest feature of
Mormonism first revealed itself—Smith pretended that he had received a
revelation allowing him to have many wives. This and other things roused
the public indignation, and Joe Smith and his brother, on the charge of
having been concerned in robbery and murder, were lodged in prison at
the town of Carthage; and while in prison were themselves murdered by a
band of a hundred men who forcibly entered in disguise for that purpose.
Although this outrage was as great as that for which the Mormon leader
was incarcerated, the public indignation continued to be so unabating
against them, that the following year they sold all their possessions in
Illinois, deserted their city and temple, and again, like the children
of Israel of old, commenced their wanderings in the wilderness, their
chosen head and prophet on the death of Smith being Brigham Young, the
son of an Eastern States’ farmer. After a long and arduous march of
3,000 miles, amid difficulties and dangers and the endurance of many
sufferings, and having crossed the Rocky Mountains they reached the
Great Salt Lake, on the fertile shores of which they settled down as in
a land of Goshen. Here a great prosperity has again commenced for them;
their numbers increase annually, and even so early as 1846 they were
able to furnish 500 volunteers for the Mexican war.
At the present time the Mormons number about 30,000. They are building a
vast city, twelve miles in circumference, the houses of which are of
brick, and their new temple, on a scale still more magnificent than the
former, is of stone, the plan it is said having been revealed to Brigham
Young in a miraculous vision. About 13,000 inhabitants reside in the
city, the remainder having established themselves on the banks of the
Jordan, which river, as we have said, connects Lake Utah with the Great
Salt Lake. They have already commenced the cultivation of the soil,
which is found to produce seventy-five bushels of wheat per acre, and
which is favourable to the growth of the potato, though the climate is
too severe for the Indian corn. Rain is rare in the country, and
irrigation is therefore indispensable. They have erected corn and
saw-mills on the streams of water which descend from the mountains, wood
being abundant for this purpose, besides which they have iron-works and
coal-mines, and various factories. They have dug canals and built
bridges. They have established regular mails with San Francisco on the
Pacific and New York on the Atlantic. Public baths, supplied from the
hot springs of that volcanic region are erected in the city, and they
have founded also a university, where lectures on the sciences,
conformable to Mormon views, are delivered. The climate is extremely
salubrious.
The Mormon government is a hierarchy; and the one great doctrine which
is impressed upon the people is submission in all things to the
priesthood; but all sects and opinions are tolerated amongst them. If
all is true which is said of their social life, morality amongst them is
at a very low ebb. Nevertheless, accounts are so contrary, that Miss
Bremer, for instance, states on what she considered good authority,
“that the habits and organisation of the community were according to the
Christian moral code, and extremely severe.” Whatever it may be however,
whether it ministers to the evil or the good in human nature, there
seems to be a very popular element in Mormonism, for it reckons about
100,000 members within its pale, both in Europe and America, and those
in Europe seem to be rapidly removing themselves to this New Jerusalem
on the banks of the Great Salt Lake. One cause of their success,
doubtless, is the wonderful system of organisation which prevails
amongst them. They do not undertake the task of establishing their
settlements according to the usually independent mode of individual and
ordinary squatters, but all is the result of organised industry, and the
result astonishes all. Captain Stansbury, in his Survey of Utah, thus
describes the mode which they adopt for the founding of a new town. “An
expedition is sent out to explore the country, with a view to the
selection of the best site. An elder of the church is then appointed to
preside over the band designated to make the first improvement. This
company is composed partly of volunteers and partly of such as are
selected by the Presidency, due regard being had to a proper
intermixture of mechanical artizans, to render the expedition
independent of all without.” And still further to illustrate this
system, we will extract a letter given by the author of a very
comprehensive article on Mormonism in the “Edinburgh Review,” and to
which we are already indebted. “In company of upwards of 100 wagons I
was sent on a mission with G. A. Smith, one of the Twelve, to Iron
County, 270 miles south of Salt Lake, in the depth of winter, to form a
settlement in the valley of Little Salt Lake, now Parowan, as a
preparatory step to the manufacturing of iron. After some difficulty in
getting through the snow, we arrived safe and sound in the valley. After
looking out a location, we formed our wagons into two parallel lines,
some seventy paces apart; we then took the boxes from the wheels and
planted them about a couple of paces from each other, so securing
ourselves that we could not easily be taken advantage of by any unknown
foe. This done, we next ran a road up the ravine, opening it to a
distance of some eight miles, bridging the creek in some five or six
places, making the timber and poles, of which there is an immense
quantity, of easy access. We next built a large meeting-house, two
stories high, of large pine-trees, all neatly joined together. We next
built a square fort with a commodious cattle-yard inside the enclosure.
The houses were some of hewn logs, others of dried bricks, all neat and
comfortable. We next inclosed a field, five by three miles square, with
a good ditch and pole-fence. We dug canals and water-ditches to the
distance of thirty or forty miles. One canal to turn the water of
another creek upon the field for irrigating purposes, was seven miles
long. We built a saw-mill and grist-mill the same season. I have not
time to tell you half the labours we performed in one season. Suffice it
to say, that when the governor came along in the spring, he pronounced
it the greatest work done in the mountains by the same amount of men.”
This system of judicious organisation, by which his proper place is
appointed to every man, has been carried throughout the Mormon
movements, and much of their success may be attributed to this cause.
The march from Missouri to the Great Salt Lake was conducted on this
system. Captain Kane, who was an eye-witness, describes 3,000 persons,
among whom were many women and children, journeying across an unknown
and wilderness country with all the discipline of a veteran army. “Every
ten of their wagons was under the care of a captain; this captain of ten
obeyed a captain of fifty; who in his turn obeyed a member of the High
Council of the Church.”
The great route to the western states of Oregon and California by the
South Pass, runs about sixty miles north of this city of the Mormons,
and one still nearer may be taken. The inhabitants supply the travellers
with fresh mules, oxen, and provisions for the journey. The road of
Independence west of the Rocky Mountains is good, and the number of
travellers which frequent it immense. The Mormons have established
ferry-boats on the Platte and Green Rivers.[85]
Such is the history and the present position of the Mormon settlement of
Utah. Already in 1850 they petitioned congress for admission into the
Union, under the designation of the State of Deseret, a name taken from
their Book of Mormon, but as yet they rank only as a territorial
government.
CHAPTER XXIII.
CALIFORNIA—STATISTICAL REVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES.
The American state of California, a portion of the Mexican Upper
California, came, as we have already said, into the possession of the
United States through their Mexican conquests, and, as the event has
proved, has supplied an important epoch not only in the history of the
United States, but of the world itself.
The first discoverer of Upper California was Sir Francis Drake, in the
year 1579, when, having doubled Cape Horn, he coasted the Pacific shore
in the vain hope of discovering a passage to the Atlantic Ocean, and
took possession of the country, to which he gave the name of New Albion,
in the name of his sovereign, Queen Elizabeth. This discovery, however,
not being followed up by colonisation, the English lost the right of
possession, which was claimed by the Spaniards as a portion of the
conquests of Cortez, which were prior to the discovery of Sir Francis
Drake.
In 1603, Philip III. of Spain sent out Sebastian Viscaino to examine the
coast of Upper California in search of suitable harbours for the Spanish
East India ships. He discovered and took possession of San Diego and
Monterey, giving on his return glowing descriptions of the beauty and
fertility of the country. The Spaniards, however, made but little
progress in colonisation, owing in part to the hostility of the natives.
Their principal, and in fact first permanent settlement was at San
Diego, but the coast, nevertheless, was frequented by their ships on
account of its valuable pearl-fisheries. Although the Spanish government
did not consider the colonisation of Upper California worth the expense,
priests of the Franciscan order established several missionary stations,
in the hope of converting the natives. Twenty-one stations were thus
formed on the most fertile lands, each occupying about fifteen square
miles. The buildings of those stations were contained in an enclosure of
adobe or sun-dried brick. To the principal missions was attached a
presidio, where was a quadrangular fort, in which was placed a company
of soldiers for the protection of the missionaries, and to assist them
also in bringing the refractory natives under their influence. The
result was, that about half the Indians in the missionary district
became nominal Christians and menial labourers at the same time. The
very constitution of these missions, however, was calculated to prevent
any effectual colonisation of the country by the whites, inasmuch as,
while the missionaries themselves were monks and nuns, the soldiers at
the presidios were not permitted to bring their wives with them; so that
_homes_ did not immediately spring up there as among the wiser
colonists, who understood by this means how to attach the settler at
once to the soil. Neither was money allowed to be in circulation, and
the _Padre_ of the mission held everything under his control. As might
be expected, therefore, these missions never took deep root in the
country, and only the few places where families were allowed to settle,
are those in which towns sprung up, of which Ciudad de Los Angeles, San
Diego and San Francisco were the principal, no one of which, in the year
1840, contained 1,000 inhabitants. Of the general population of Upper
California, Humboldt states, that in 1802 it consisted of 15,562
converted Indians and 1,300 of other classes; in 1840 it is estimated
that the number of whites was 5,000, of mistigoes or mixed 2,000, and of
natives about 18,000. From this time, when the American exploring
parties, of which we shall speak presently, had opened as it were a door
into these hitherto unknown regions, and the advancing tide of western
emigration reached its threshold, population began rapidly to increase;
so that the Hon. Butler King states, in his official report, that “in
1846 Colonel Fremont had little difficulty in calling to his standard
some 500 fighting men, and that, at the close of the war with Mexico,
from 10,000 to 15,000 Americans and Californians, exclusive of converted
Indians, were then in the territory. The immigration of American
citizens in 1849, the year following the cession of California to the
United States, was estimated at 80,000, that of foreigners at 20,000.”
We are indebted to Mrs. Willard for the greater portion of the following
rapid sketch:—
“This country during the Spanish rule constituted a part of the
viceroyalty of Mexico or New Spain. When Mexico became a federal
republic, not finding California sufficiently populous to form a state,
she established over it a territorial government. The Californians, like
the Mexicans, sometimes had their revolutions, and declared themselves
independent; but they always returned again to their allegiance, and
till the opening of the war between the republics of America and Mexico,
they were governed as a territory of the latter. Los Angeles was the
seat of the territorial government; a member of the eminent family of
Pico was at its head, and General Castro, the military chief, made
Monterey his residence.
“A few years since the country between the Rocky Mountains and the
Pacific was as little known as the centre of Africa. In the years 1803
and 1804, Messrs. Lewis and Clarke, sent out by President Jackson,
explored the Missouri to its sources, crossed the Rocky Mountains in
latitude 47°, then struck upon the head waters of the Columbia, and
followed its source to the Pacific Ocean. Settlements succeeded these
discoveries and those subsequently of Captain Grey. The purchase of
Louisiana from France, in 1803, carried the American dominion from the
Mississippi to the heights of the Rocky Mountains. All the country
beyond those mountains and south of Oregon was, previous to the late war
with Mexico, in the possession of that country, and in 1840 its place on
the map of the world was a blank.
“The American government in 1838, sent out, chiefly for the benefit of
trade and commerce, a naval exploring expedition under Captain Charles
Wilkes, to coast the American continent to the south and west, and to
explore the islands of the Pacific. Captain Wilkes was directed to make
surveys and examinations of the coast of Oregon and the Columbia River,
and afterwards along the coast of California, with especial reference to
the Bay of San Francisco. After executing this order in August and
September, 1841, he pronounced the harbour of San Francisco to be ‘one
of the finest, if not the very best in the world.’ The town, then called
_Yerba Buono_, he said, consisted of one large frame building, occupied
by the Hudson Bay Company; the store of an American merchant, a
billiard-room and a bar; the cabin of a ship occupied as a dwelling;
besides out-houses, few and far between. The most prominent man in the
region was Captain Sutter, a Swiss by birth, and once a lieutenant in
the Swiss guards of Charles X. of France, but who had immigrated from
Missouri to California. Having obtained from Mexico a grant of land
thirty leagues square, he located his residence within it and near the
confluence of the American river with the Sacremento; here he built a
fort at the junction of the rivers and laid out a town, to which he gave
the name of New Helvetia, but which has since been called Sacremento
City. Captain Wilkes reported favourably of the soil and productions of
the country.
“In 1842, John C. Fremont, at that time a lieutenant of topographical
engineers, being ordered on an exploring tour, left the mouth of the
Kansas in the month of June with a party of about twenty. He travelled
along the fertile valley of this river; struck off upon the sterile
banks of the Platte River, followed its South Fork to St. Vrain’s Fort,
and thence northerly to Fort Laramie, on the North Fork of the same
stream. Following up, from this point, the North Fork and then its
affluent the Sweet Water River, he was conducted by a gentle ascent to
that wonderful gateway in the Rocky Mountains called the South Pass. He
had found on his lonely way a few straggling emigrants bound to Oregon,
but not one to California. Having explored the vicinity of the South
Pass, his orders were executed, and he returned.
“The next year, again under the auspices of government, and with a party
of thirty-nine, he set out earlier in the season, with special orders to
examine and report upon the country between the Rocky Mountains and the
line of Captain Wilkes’s explorations on the Pacific coast. He now
crossed the Rocky Mountains further south, and where they were 8,000
feet in height. He then examined and laid open, by his report, the
region of the Salt Lake, having reached that extraordinary expanse of
salt water by following its beautiful affluent, the Bear River.
“Fremont, now brevet captain, was, on September 19th, at Fort Hall, on
his way to Oregon. Here he met a Mr. Chiles, the only emigrant he had
yet seen to California. Having, in the manner dictated by his orders,
explored Oregon, he turned south and commenced his route to California,
by traversing in winter the terrible and dangerous snows of the Sierra
Nevada. From this seemingly interminable way, the lost and famished
wanderers emerged upon the waters of the Sacremento, and they followed
its affluent, the American Fork, to Sutter’s Fort, ignorant of the
golden treasures beneath their feet, soon to set in motion a rapidly
concentrating population from every corner of the world. After their
wants had been kindly supplied by Captain Sutter, the party travelled
south and beheld and enjoyed the vernal beauties of the flowery valley
of the San Joaquin. Turning then to the southern extremity of the Sierra
Nevada, they next passed the arid waste of the Great Desert Basin.
“They had discovered and named on their way new rivers and mountain
passes; and had laid open regions which had heretofore, except to the
hunter and the savage, been but the hidden recesses of nature. They had
explored California and made known an overland route.”
Mr. Polk entered upon the presidential office resolved to carry out the
Mexican war, as well as to make its results advantageous to his country
by putting her in possession not only of New Mexico but of California
also, the importance of which he fully estimated as opening up a great
commercial state on the Pacific, even before its almost fabulous wealth
of gold had become known.
The Mexican war went on, the American interests being advanced at every
step, and finally the treaty of Guadaloupe Hidalgo established peace
between the two republics, and gave the United States government
possession of that vast territory which she coveted with a prescient
wisdom, and which it assuredly was the will of God that she should
people with her industrious and enterprising sons.
This treaty, which put the Americans in possession of California, was
signed in February, 1848, and by a coincidence so extraordinary, that
had it been imagined by a writer of fiction, it would have been
considered improbable, if not impossible, the discovery of the gold was
made within one month from that time. The first gold was found in the
lands of that Captain Sutter whom we have already mentioned, on the
American Fork of the Sacremento, and almost immediately afterwards in
various other localities. The possession of the vast extent of what was
so lately Mexican territory, with its framework of society so different
to that of the United States, had caused considerable anxiety in the
minds of many thoughtful men as to the result. It was feared that many
years must pass before a sufficient number of American citizens had
settled in these new lands to fuse the old elements into a congruous
mass, and that before this should take place bloodshed and disruption
might have made the acquired territory a dear purchase. But Providence,
who overrules human events for the wisest and best purposes, signally
set at rest all these doubts, by permitting the discovery of the gold,
which would act as the most tempting lure to call away, not only from
the older states, but from the very ends of the earth, a population
which would at once sweep away the old influences and begin all anew.
Gold, which in so many instances had been a dire curse, was here
converted into a blessing.
The tide of emigration set in. In the following year, 1849, 30,000 souls
from the United States alone emigrated to California. No outpouring of
people in the Middle Ages ever equalled this. We will give a little
sketch of this great movement from the graphic and elegant pen of Bayard
Taylor, who saw with his own eyes what he describes:—
“Sacremento city was the goal of the emigration by the northern routes.
From the beginning of August to the last of December, scarcely a day
passed without the arrival of some man or company of men and families,
from the mountains, to pitch their tents for a few days on the banks of
the river, and rest from their months of hardship. The vicissitudes
through which these people had passed, the perils which they had
encountered, and the toils they had endured, seem to me without
precedent in history. The story of 30,000 souls accomplishing a journey
of more than 2,000 miles through a savage and but partially explored
wilderness, crossing on their way two mountains equal to the Alps in
height and asperity, besides broad tracts of burning desert and plains
of nearly equal desolation, where a few patches of stunted shrubs and
springs of brackish water was their only stay, has in it so much
heroism, daring and sublime endurance, that we may vainly question the
records of any age for its equal. Standing as I was at the closing stage
of that grand pilgrimage, the sight of those adventurers, as they came
in day by day, and the hearing of their stories, had a more fascinating,
because more real interest, than the tales of the old travellers which
so impress us in childhood.
“It would be impossible to give, in a general description of the
emigration, viewed as one great movement, a complete idea of its
wonderful phases. The experience of any single man, which a few years
ago would have made him a hero for life, becomes mere common-place when
it is but one of thousands; yet the spectacle of a great continent,
through a region of 1,000 miles from north to south, being overrun with
these adventurous bands, cannot be pictured without the relation of many
episodes of individual bravery and suffering. Without giving an account
of the emigration generally, I will content myself with a sketch of what
was encountered by those who took the northern route, the great overland
highway of the continent, that very route which we have described
Captain Fremont as having opened.
“The great starting-point for this route was Independence, where
thousands were encamped through the month of April, waiting until the
grass should be sufficiently high for their cattle, before they ventured
on the broad ocean of the plains. From the 1st of May to the 1st of
June, company after company took its departure from the frontier of
civilisation, till the emigrant trail from Fort Leavensworth on the
Missouri, to Fort Laramie at the foot of the Rocky Mountains, was one
long line of mule-trains and wagons. The rich meadows of the Nebraske,
or Platte, were settled for the time, and a single traveller could have
journeyed for the space of 1,000 miles, as certain of his lodgings and
regular meals as if he were riding through the agricultural districts of
the middle states. The wandering tribes of Indians on the plains, the
Pawnees, Sioux, and Arapahoes, were alarmed and bewildered by this
strange apparition. They believed that they were about to be swept away
for ever from their hunting-grounds and graves. As the season advanced,
and the great body of the emigrants got under way, they gradually
withdrew from the vicinity of the trail, and betook themselves to
grounds which the former did not reach. All conflicts with them were
thus avoided.
“Another and more terrible scourge, however, was doomed to fall upon
them. The cholera, ascending the Mississippi from New Orleans, reached
St. Louis about the time of their departure from Independence, and
overtook them before they were fairly embarked on the wilderness. The
frequent rains of the early spring, added to the hardships and exposure
of their travel, prepared the way for its ravages, and the first 300 or
400 miles of the trail were marked by graves. It is estimated that about
4,000 persons perished from this cause.
“By the time the companies reached Fort Laramie the epidemic had
expended its violence, and in the pure air of the elevated region they
were safe from further attack. But then the real hardships of their
journey began. Up and down the mountains that arise in the Sweet Water
Valley; over the spurs of the Wind River chain; through the Devil’s
Gate, and past the stupendous mass of Rock Independence, they toiled
slowly up to the South Pass, descended to the tributaries of the
Colorado, and plunged into the rugged defiles of the Tampanozu
Mountains. Here the pasturage became scarce, and the companies were
obliged to take separate trails in order to find sufficient grass for
their teams. Great numbers also suffered immensely for want of food, and
were compelled to kill their horses and mules to keep themselves from
starvation. Nor was it unusual for a mess, by way of variety to the
tough mule-steaks, to kill a quantity of rattlesnakes, with which the
mountains abounded, and have a dish of them fried for supper.”
We have already spoken of the assistance rendered to these vast trains
of adventurers by the Mormons, then lately settled at their new city on
the Great Salt Lake. “Remarkable,” says Bayard Taylor, “must have been
the scene which was presented during the summer. There a community of
religious enthusiasts, having established themselves beside an inland
sea, in a grand valley shut in by snow-capped mountains, 1,000 miles
from any other civilised spot, and dreaming only of rebuilding the
Temple and creating a new Jerusalem, were aroused by the advance of
these vast pilgrim-bands. And indeed, without this resting-place in
mid-journey, the sufferings of the emigrants must have been much
aggravated. The Mormons, however, whose rich grain lands in the valley
of the Utah River had produced them abundance of supplies, were able to
spare sufficient for those whose supplies were exhausted. Two or three
thousand who arrived late in the season remained in the valley all
winter.