THE READING OF BIOGRAPHY
Since literature is, broadly, the written record of human life,
biography, the life story of real men, lies at the core and center of
literature. On one side biography is allied to history, which is the
collective biography of many men. On the other side it is related to
fiction.
In our discussion of “History” we found that there are two ideals or
methods of writing it: one the picturesque, the other the scientific.
The scientific historian accuses the picturesque historian of
falsifications and disproportions. Scientific history is new and
aggressive and it accentuates its differences from the old ideals.
Yet there is no essential opposition between fact and an imaginative
representation of fact. Gibbon is picturesque, yet he is one of the
first great historians to make exhaustive study and accurate use of
documents. Carlyle can be as eloquent when he is telling the truth
as when he is misled by his love of color and his partisan passions.
The great historian of the future will not falsify or distort facts
except as human nature must always intervene before the facts
which it presents in human language. The true historian will have
great imagination, great vision, and yet have scrupulous care to
precisions of truth. For the present, history is recovering from its
traditional eloquence and trying to learn to present facts honestly
and clearly. Never again will the spirit of history and historical
criticism tolerate such a magnificent fabrication as the end of De
Quincey’s “Flight of a Tartar Tribe,” in which he gives, with all the
paraphernalia of a learned note, the inscription carved on the columns
of granite and brass to commemorate the migration of the Kalmucks. The
columns are a structure of De Quincey’s fancy, and the inscription
is in such prose as he alone among white men or Chinamen knew how
to write! In De Quincey’s time it was not considered an ethical
aberration to invent facts. In a ponderous article which he wrote for
the _Encyclopædia Britannica_ on Shakespeare, he quoted the poet from
memory and spun some of the biography from his own fancy. The pious and
learned President of Harvard College, Jared Sparks, for the greater
glory of America and its founder, “improved” the style of Washington’s
private papers and ably defended the emendations. And Weems, an early
biographer of the man who seems nobler the more truly we know him and
who needs no legend to dignify him, wrote his life of Washington with
the deliberate purpose, indicated on the title page, of inculcating
patriotic and moral lessons in the young. Hence the cherry-tree story.
History has improved in its morals, if not in its manners, and
scientific biography is making some headway. But biography is still
in a hazy state of legend and myth. Approach any man you choose,
especially among men of letters who have been written about by
other men of letters, and you find a mass of conjecture and legend
masquerading as fact. Sometimes there is an added garment of disguise,
the dignified gown of science and scholarship.
No great writer has suffered from credulous and weak-principled
biographers so much as the greatest of all--Shakespeare. Most of the
lives of him are gigantic myths, built on hardly as many known facts
as would fill two pages of this book. Of late historians and men
of science have begun to laugh at literary biographers for making
such confusion of the institution of Shakespeare biography. It is
well enough for the young reader to learn carefully the biographical
notes prefixed to the school editions of Shakespeare, for the better
the young reader learns school exercises and the notes in the text
books, the better basis he has for reading and thinking for himself.
I may say, however, that there are at present, so far as I know,
only two books on the life of Shakespeare which are trustworthy,
Halliwell-Phillips’s “Outlines,” which gives all the documents, and
a recent masterly discussion of the documents by George G. Greenwood
called “The Shakespeare Problem Restated.” It is a problem and not
one for us to go into here except that it illustrates what we are
saying about scientific and fanciful biography. I should not wonder
if another generation were more interested than our fathers have been
in the poetic achievements, whatever they are, of the man whose
youthful portrait is on the cover of this book--Francis Bacon. One
thing is certain: the rising generation had better learn early to
approach with caution and tolerant scepticism books bearing such titles
as “Shakespeare, Man, Player and Poet,” “Shakespeare, His Life, His
Mind and His Art.” We had better bend our attentions to the plays
themselves, and when we wish to read _about_ Shakespeare, turn not
to the so-called biographies and “studies in Shakespeare” by college
professors, but to the great critics, Coleridge, Hazlitt, Lamb, De
Quincey, Pater.
As we said that we, mere readers, should leave scientific history in
the hands of specialists, so we may leave the problems of literary
biography to expert investigators. We are interested rather in that
kind of biography which is as old as the earliest legends of heroes,
that which celebrates the great ones of the earth. If it is true to
fact so much the better; but since biographers are likely to be the
friends, kinsmen, admirers of their subjects, biography will be the
last division of history to be informed with the scientific spirit. And
so far as it is an art, it will err on the right side, like fiction and
poetry, by presenting an ennobled view of human nature.
That biography is an art is proved by the admittedly great examples.
The novelist who creates a fictitious biography has no more difficult
and delicate task than the biographer who finds in a real life story
the true character of a man, and gives to the events which produced
the character artistic form, unity, and movement. Boswell’s “Life
of Samuel Johnson” and Robert Southey’s “Life of Lord Nelson” are
as beautifully designed as the best novels. Boswell’s masterpiece
resembles a realistic novel and Southey’s “Nelson” is like a romantic
tale of chivalry and heroism.
Benjamin Jowett, the great professor of Greek at Oxford, said that
biography is the best material for ethical teaching. In many ways it
is the best material for all kinds of teaching. For everything that
human beings have done and thought is to be found in the life stories
of interesting individuals, so that biography opens the way to every
subject. In our discussion of history we said that the directest
path to the heart of an historical epoch is through the biography of
an important figure or a wise observer of that epoch. There is no
better political history of America during the Civil War than Nicolay
and Hay’s “Life of Lincoln.” Grant’s “Memoirs” contains all that an
ordinary reader needs to know of the movements of the Northern armies
after Grant took command. The memoirs and reminiscences of Davis and
Confederate generals give us an adequate account of the civil and
military movements of the Southern side. Carlyle’s “Cromwell,” no
matter how biased and overwrought it seems to discriminating students,
will open the seventeenth century for those of us who cannot be
specialists in history. Bourrienne’s “Memoirs of Napoleon,” in the
English translation, is a good introduction to the history of Europe
during the Napoleonic wars (and it makes little difference to us that
the book was largely rewritten and augmented by the French editor).
Morley’s “Life of Gladstone” is a history of Victorian England. The
life of Luther is the heart of the Protestant Reformation.
The layman who would know something of the tendencies of modern science
cannot do better than to read the biographies of men of science in
which sympathetic pupils have told in a style more simple than the
masters’ treatises the intellectual principles and human conditions
of the masters’ work. Such biographies are the “Life and Letters” of
Darwin, of Huxley, of Agassiz. The “Life of Pasteur” by Valery-Radot,
which has been translated into English, is a clear account of the main
tendencies of modern medicine, the subject that all the world is so
much interested in. Anyone who reads it will know better how to make
his way through the masses of popular articles on medicine and public
health in the current magazines.
Since literary men are the most interesting of all heroes to other
makers of books, it is natural that the lives of the masters of
literature should have been written in greater abundance and usually
with greater skill and charm than the lives of any other class of
men. A good way, perhaps the best way, to study literature is to
read the lives of a dozen or a score of great writers. An ambitious
youth, determined to lay the foundations of a knowledge of literature,
might begin to read in any order the biographies in the series called
_English Men of Letters_. From that series I should cross out William
Black’s “Goldsmith” and substitute Forster’s or Washington Irving’s
“Life of Goldsmith”; I should also omit Leslie Stephen’s “George Eliot”
and read instead the “Life and Letters” by J. W. Cross. It would be as
well to pass by Mr. Henry James’s “Hawthorne” in favor of the biography
by Mr. George E. Woodberry in _American Men of Letters_.
It will not be wise even for the enthusiastic reader of literature to
confine his reading in biography to the lives of men of letters. There
is such a thing as being too much interested in bookish persons. Men
of action have led more eventful lives than most writers, and their
biographers are likely therefore to have more of a story to tell.
Whenever you find yourself interested in any man, when some reference
to him rouses your curiosity, read his biography. In general it is
better to read about him in a complete “Life,” even if it is a bulky
one in a forbidding number of volumes. You are not obliged to read it
all. It is better to roam for half an hour through Boswell than to read
a short life of Johnson. This is a day of pellet books, handy volumes,
and popular compendiums; we need to learn again the use and delight
of a little reading in big books, in which we can dwell for long or
short periods. We need, also, to get over the idea that only learned
persons and special students can go to original documents. A boy of
fifteen will have more fun turning over the state papers and letters
and addresses of Washington and Jefferson and Lincoln than in reading
a short encyclopedia article on one of those great men. Just try it
the next time you happen to be wandering aimlessly in a public library
and see if you do not stumble on something interesting. The whole
“Dictionary of National Biography” is not so much worth owning and,
except for purposes of reference, not so much worth reading as half as
many volumes of first-hand biography.
The first of all original documentary biography is autobiography. A
man knows more about his own life than anyone else and he is quite as
likely to tell the truth about it as his official biographer. “The
Story of My Life” is always an attractive title, no matter who the hero
is. If an autobiography has continued to find readers for a number of
years, it is likely to be worth looking at. Sometimes men who are not
entitled to be called great have written great autobiographies. The
“Autobiography” of Joseph Jefferson is full of delightful humor and
sweetness. At a time when the theater is not an institution of which we
are proud and actors as they appear in the public prints are usually
bores and vulgarians, Jefferson’s “Autobiography” will give the reader
a new sense of the potential dignity of the stage and of the humanity
of the actor’s profession. Among the great men who have written
autobiographies we have mentioned Mill and Franklin and Grant. Others
who have written delightful volumes of self-portraiture are Goethe,
Gibbon, Trollope, Mrs. Oliphant. As a working rule, I should suggest
that when you are interested in a man, you should first read his
autobiography if he wrote one. If he did not, turn to the most complete
story of his life, the one that contains whatever letters and documents
have survived. And as a third choice try to find a life of him by some
writer who was intimate with him during his life, or who is an expert
in the subject to which his life was devoted, or who is a master in the
art of biography.
LIST OF BIOGRAPHIES
_Supplementary to Chapter VIII_
This list of biographies does not constitute a catalogue of great men.
It merely gives some biographies that have literary quality or some
other quality that makes them important. The subject of the biography
is given first whenever the person written about would naturally come
into the mind before the author of the book; thus: Samuel Johnson;
“Life” by James Boswell. In other cases the author comes first; thus:
Plutarch; Lives.
JOHN AND ABIGAIL ADAMS. _Familiar Letters of John Adams and His Wife,
Abigail Adams, During the Revolution._
JOSEPH ADDISON. _Life_, by William John Courthope.
In _English Men of Letters_.
THOMAS BAILEY ALDRICH. _Life_, by Ferris Greenslet.
ALFRED THE GREAT. _Life_, by Walter Besant.
HENRI FRÉDÉRIC AMIEL. _Journal_, translated by Mrs. Humphrey Ward.
AURELIUS AUGUSTINUS. _Confessions of St. Augustine._
A remarkable autobiography. Pusey’s translation is in _Everyman’s
Library_.
FRANCIS BACON. _Life and Letters_, edited by James Spedding.
JAMES MATTHEW BARRIE. _Margaret Ogilvy._
Barrie’s life of his mother; a delicious book.
GEORGE HENRY BORROW. _The Bible in Spain._
The subtitle defines this interesting book: “The journeys, adventures,
and imprisonments of an Englishman in an attempt to circulate the
Scriptures in the peninsula.” Readers of Borrow (see page 75 of this
Guide) will be interested in his “Life and Letters,” edited by William
I. Knapp.
ROBERT BROWNING. _Life and Letters_, by Alexandra Leighton Orr.
JAMES BRYCE. _Studies in Contemporary Biography._
EDMUND BURKE. _Life_, by John Morley.
In _English Men of Letters_.
ROBERT BURNS. _Life_, by John Gibson Lockhart.
JULIUS CÆSAR. _Life_, by James Anthony Froude. _Commentaries on the
Gallic and Civil Wars._
THOMAS CARLYLE AND MRS. CARLYLE. _Life and Letters_, by James Anthony
Froude.
THOMAS DE QUINCEY. _Autobiographic Sketches._ _Confessions of an
English Opium-Eater._ _Reminiscences of the Lake Poets._
CHARLES DICKENS. _Life_, by John Forster.
In the edition abridged and revised by the English novelist, the late
George Gissing.
GEORGE ELIOT. _Letters and Journals_, edited by John Walter Cross.
RALPH WALDO EMERSON. _Life_, by Oliver Wendell Holmes.
In _American Men of Letters_. See also Emerson’s letters to Carlyle and
John Sterling.
FRANCIS OF ASSISI. _Life_, by Paul Sabatier.
In the English translation.
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN. _Autobiography._
WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE. _Life_, by John Morley.
JOHANN WOLFGANG VON GOETHE. _Autobiography._
Translated in _Bohn’s Library_.
OLIVER GOLDSMITH. _Life_, by Austin Dobson. See also the biographies
by John Forster and Washington Irving.
ULYSSES SIMPSON GRANT. _Personal Memoirs._ _Life_, by Owen Wister (in
the _Beacon Biographies_).
THOMAS GRAY. _Letters_, edited with a biographical sketch by Henry
Milnor Rideout.
ALEXANDER HAMILTON. _Life_, by Henry Cabot Lodge.
In _American Statesmen_.
NATHANIEL HAWTHORNE. _Hawthorne and His Circle_, by Julian Hawthorne.
_Life_, by George Edward Woodberry (in _American Men of Letters_).
OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES. _Life and Letters_, edited by John Torrey
Morse, Jr.
THOMAS HENRY HUXLEY. _Life and Letters_, edited by Leonard Huxley.
WASHINGTON IRVING. _Life and Letters_, edited by Pierre Munroe Irving.
_Life_, by Charles Dudley Warner (in _American Men of Letters_).
JEANNE D’ARC. _Life_, by Francis Cabot Lowell. _Life_, by Andrew
Lang. _Condemnation and Rehabilitation of Jeanne d’Arc_, by J. E. J.
Quicherat (in the English translation).
SAMUEL JOHNSON. _Lives of the Poets_, selected by Matthew Arnold.
_Life of Johnson_, by James Boswell (in two volumes in _Everyman’s
Library_).
JOHN KEATS. _Life_, by Sidney Colvin.
In _English Men of Letters_.
CHARLES LAMB. _Letters_, edited by Alfred Ainger.
ROBERT EDWARD LEE. _Life_, by Philip Alexander Bruce. _Life and
Letters_, by John William Jones. _Recollections and Letters_, by R. E.
Lee, Jr. _Life_, by Thomas Nelson Page.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN. _Life_, by John George Nicolay and John Hay. _A Short
Life of Abraham Lincoln_, by John George Nicolay. _Lincoln, Master of
Men_, by Alonzo Rothschild.
DAVID LIVINGSTONE. _Last Journals in Central Africa. How I Found
Livingstone_, by Henry Morton Stanley.
HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW. _Life and Letters_, edited by Samuel
Longfellow.
THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY. _Life and Letters_, by George Otto
Trevelyan.
JOHN STUART MILL. _Autobiography._
JOHN MILTON. _Life_, by Mark Pattison.
In _English Men of Letters_.
Napoleon. _Life_, by John Gibson Lockhart. _Life_, by William Milligan
Sloane. _Memoirs of L. A. F. de Bourrienne._ _Life_, by John Holland
Rose.
MARGARET OLIPHANT. _Autobiography and Letters._
CHARLES WILLIAM CHADWICK OMAN. _Seven Roman Statesmen of the Later
Republic: the Gracchi, Sulla, Crassus, Cato, Pompey, Cæsar._
SAMUEL PEPYS. _Diary._
Two volumes in _Everyman’s Library_.
PLUTARCH. _Lives._
In the Elizabethan translation by Thomas North, or the modern
translation by Arthur Hugh Clough. An abridged edition of this is
published for schools by Ginn & Co.
JACOB AUGUST RIIS. _The Making of an American._
WALTER SCOTT. _Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott_, by John
Gibson Lockhart.
There is an abridged edition of Lockhart, edited by J. M. Sloan.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE. _The Shakespeare Problem Restated_, by George G.
Greenwood. _Outlines of the Life of Shakespeare_, by James Orchard
Halliwell-Phillips.
At the present time the most reliable works on Shakespeare’s life.
WILLIAM TECUMSEH SHERMAN. _Memoirs. Home Letters of General Sherman_,
edited by M. A. DeWolf Howe.
ROBERT SOUTHEY. _Life of Nelson._
In _Everyman’s Library_.
ANTHONY TROLLOPE. _Autobiography._
IZAAK WALTON. _Lives_ of John Donne, George Herbert and Richard Hooker.
GEORGE WASHINGTON. _Life of Washington_, by Washington Irving. _The
Seven Ages of Washington_, by Owen Wister. _Life_, by Woodrow Wilson.
JOHN WESLEY. _The Heart of Wesley’s Journal_, with an essay by
Augustine Birrell, published by Fleming-Revell Co.
The journal is found in four volumes of _Everyman’s Library_.