THE ARABIAN TALES.

In one of the Arabian Tales, called “The one thousand and one Nights:”

an original book, and which contains true pictures of the manners of

that nation, is a story which is well worth reminding the reader of,

that of a certain Cobler, whose name, if I mistake not, was Shak-Abak.

This Cobler having fallen in love with a beautiful lady belonging to

some wealthy man, or man of power, of whom he had had a glance through

the window of her house, would afterwards keep for whole hours every

day, staring at the window. The lady, who proposed to make game of him,

one day sent one of her female slaves to introduce him to her, and then

gave him to understand, that if he could overtake her by running after

her through the apartments of her house he would have the pleasure of

her company; he was besides told, that in order to run more nimbly, he

must strip to the shirt. To all this Shak-Abak agreed: and after a

number of turns up and down the house, he was at last enticed into a

long, dark, and narrow passage, at the farthest extremity of which an

open door was to be perceived; he made to it as fast as he could, and

when he had reached it, rushed headlong through it; when, to his no

small astonishment, the door instantly shut upon him, and he found

himself in the middle of a public street of Bagdat, which was chiefly

inhabited by shoemakers. A number of these latter, struck at the sudden

and strange appearance of the unfortunate Shak-Abak, who, besides

stripping to his shirt, had suffered his eye-brows to be shaved, laid

hold of him, and, as the Arabian Author relates, soundly lashed him with

their straps.

* * * * *

Various stories were given out by the monks of the chastisement received

by persons who had persecuted them. This misfortune happened to a

certain servant of the Emperor Nicephorus, who, not satisfied with

exacting unjust tributes from the common people with great rigour,

offered afterwards to use the monasteries in the same manner. “The

Emperor,” says the author from whom this fact is extracted, “sent one of

the grooms of his bedchamber to receive the usual tribute. As he was a

man exceedingly eager after money and unlawful gain, he committed great

oppressions both on the common citizens and the inhabitants of the

monastery of St. Nicon; for the government of cities and the care of

levying duties are usually entrusted, not to the just and mild, but to

hard-hearted and inhuman persons. The monks, who were possessed of no

money, endeavoured to soothe the above unmerciful man by their

discourses; but he, thirsty after gold, was as deaf to their prayers as

the asp to conjurgations, and made no more account of their

remonstrances, than, to use the words of Scripture, of ‘the crackling of

thorns under a pot.’ On the contrary, his wrath and insolence increased

farther, he caused several of them to be thrown into a jail, and

prepared to plunder the monastery. The remaining monks then applied to

their Saint for assistance, who presently made them experience the happy

effects of it; for during the following night he appeared to the groom

with a threatening indignant aspect, and lashed him severely; then

speaking to him, told him, for his words ought to be recorded: ‘Thou

hast thrown the heads of the monastery into chains, if thou dost not

release them instantly, thy death shall be the consequence.’”

* * * * *

It was politely adopted in Denmark, and even in the Court of that

country, towards the latter end of the last century, as we are informed

by Lord Molesworth, in his “Account of Denmark.” It was the custom, his

Lordship says, at the end of every hunting-match at Court, that, in

order to conclude the entertainment with as much festivity as it had

begun, a proclamation was made,—if any could inform against any person

who had infringed the known laws of hunting, let him stand forth and

accuse. As soon as the contravention was ascertained, the culprit was

made to kneel down between the horns of the stag that had been hunted;

two of the gentlemen removed the skirts of his coat; when the King,

taking a small long wand in his hand, laid a certain number of blows,

which was proportioned to the greatness of the offence, on the culprit;

whilst, in the meantime (the noble author adds) the huntsmen with their

brass horns, and the dogs with their loud openings, proclaimed the

King’s justice and the criminal’s punishment.

* * * * *

In Spain, when gentlemen proposed to discipline themselves in honour of

their mistresses, and were of considerable rank, the ceremony was

performed with great state and magnificence. Madame D’Aunoy relates that

the day the Duke of Vejar disciplined himself, an hundred white wax

candles were carried before the procession: the Duke was preceded by

sixty of his friends (vassals perhaps, or dependents) and followed by an

hundred, all attended by their own pages and footmen; and besides them

there were no doubt abundance of priests and crucifixes.

As these Spanish gallants have no less honour than devotion, battles

frequently take place between them, for the assertion of their just

prerogatives; and this, for instance, seldom fails to be the case when

two processions happen to meet in the same street: each party think they

are entitled to a most honourable side of the way; and a scuffle is the

consequence. This happened at the time of the procession of the

above-mentioned Duke of Vejar: another procession, conducted by the

Marquis of Villahermosa, entered the same street, at the other end of

it: the light-armed troops, otherwise the servants with their lighted

long wax candles, began the engagement, bedaubing the clothes, and

singeing the whiskers and hair of each other; then the body of infantry,

that is to say the gentlemen with their swords, made their appearance,

and continued the battle; and at last the two noble champions themselves

met, and began a fight with their disciplines. Another instance of

penitents using their disciplines as weapons, is to be found in Don

Quixote (where two noble champions began a smart engagement with each

other); their self-flagellations were for a while changed, with great

rapidity, into mutual ones, and their weapons being demolished, they

were about to begin a closer kind of fight, when their friends

interfered, and parted them: the high, sharp, and stiff cap of one of

the two combatants, which had fallen in the dirt, was taken up, properly

cleansed, and again placed upon his head; and the two processions went

each their own course, dividing as chance determined it. The whole

ceremony was afterwards concluded with splendid entertainments which

each of the noble disciplinants gave in their houses, to the persons who

had formed their respective processions, during which abundance of fine

compliments were paid them on their piety, their gallantry, and their

elegance in giving themselves discipline.

[Illustration:

HENRY II. SCOURGED AT THE ALTAR OF THOMAS A BECKETT.

]

A certain friar, in a convent of the Benedictine Order, found means to

procure, besides plenty of good wine, a certain number of dishes

extremely nice and well seasoned, several of which were expressly

forbidden by the institutes of the Order; and he invited a select party

of brothers to partake of his fare. As they could not, with any degree

of safety, carry on the entertainment in the cell of any of them, they

thought of repairing to one of the cellars of the house, where they hid

themselves in one of those wide and shallow tuns (about eight or nine

feet in diameter, and three or four deep) which serve in the making of

wines. The Abbot, in the meanwhile, missing so many of the monks from

the convent, went in search of them through all the different

apartments; being unable to find them, he at last went down into the

cellars, and soon perceived whereabout they lay: he stepped up to the

place, and, on a sudden, made his appearance over the edge of the tun.

The monks were prodigiously alarmed at this unexpected appearance of the

Abbot; and there was none among them but who would have gladly

compromised the affair, by giving up his remaining share of the

entertainment, and submitting to instant dismission. But the Abbot,

contrary to all hope, put on a mild and cheerful look; he kindly

expostulated with the monks on their having made a secret of the affair

to him; expressed to them the great pleasure it would have been for him

to be one of their party; and added, that he should still be very glad

to be admitted to partake of the entertainment. The monks answered, by

all means: the Abbot thereupon leaped into the tun; sat down among them;

partook of their excellent wine and well-seasoned dishes with the

greatest freedom; and, in short, spent an hour or two with them in the

tun, in the most agreeable and convivial manner.

At last the Abbot thought proper to withdraw, and as soon as he had

taken his leave, some of the monks began to admire his extraordinary

condescension, while the others were not without fears that it foreboded

some misfortune. Indeed, the latter were in the right; for the reader

must not think that the Abbot had acted in the manner above described,

out of any sudden temptation he had felt at the sight of the jollity of

the friars, or of the dainties that composed the entertainment: by no

means; his design had only been, by thus making himself guilty along

with them, to be the better able to show them afterwards the way to

repentance, and thereby derive good from evil. In fact, the next day, a

chapter having been summoned, the Abbot desired the Prior to fill his

place, while himself took his seat among the rest of the monks. Soon

after the chapter was met, he stepped forward into the middle of the

assembly, accused himself of the sin he had committed the day before,

and requested that discipline might be inflicted upon him. The Prior

objected much to a discipline being inflicted on the Abbot; but the

latter having insisted, his request was complied with. The other monks

were at first greatly astonished, but seeing no possibility of keeping

back on that occasion, they stepped into the middle of the chapter, and

likewise confessed their sin; when the Abbot, by means of a proper

person he had selected for the purpose, got a lusty discipline to be

inflicted upon every one of his late fellow-banqueters.

* * * * *

The celebrated fathers of St. Lazare, in Paris, whose school was

otherwise named the “Seminary of the good Boys” (_des bons enfans_) have

no less recommended themselves by the regularity of the disciplines they

inflicted, than the Reverend Father Jesuits. They were even superior to

the latter, in regard to those recommendatory flagellations mentioned

above, which were administered to such persons as were, by some means or

other, induced to deliver letters to the fathers for that purpose. Being

situated in the metropolis, the seminary carried on a very extensive

business in that way. Fathers or mothers who had undutiful sons, tutors

who had unruly pupils, uncles who were instructed with the education of

ungovernable nephews, masters who had wickedly-inclined apprentices,

whom they durst not themselves undertake to correct, applied to the

fathers of St. Lazare, and by properly feeing them, had their wishes

gratified. Indeed the fathers had found means to secure their doors with

such good bolts, they were so well stocked with the necessary implements

for giving disciplines, and had such a numerous crew of stout Cuiftres

to inflict them, that they never failed to execute any job they had

engaged to perform, and without minding either age, courage, or

strength, were at all times ready to undertake the most difficult

flagellations. So regular was the trade carried on, by the good fathers

in that branch of business, that letters of the above kind directed to

them, were literally notes of hand payable on sight; and provided such

notes did but come to hand, whoever the bearer might be, the fathers

were sure to have them discharged with punctuality.

This kind of business, as it was carried on for a number of years,

frequently gave rise to accidents, or mistakes, of rather a ludicrous

kind. Young men who had letters to carry to the house of St. Lazare, the

contents of which they did not mistrust, would often undesignedly charge

other persons to carry the same for them, either on account of their

going to that part of the town, or for some other reason of a like kind:

and the unfortunate bearer, who suspected no harm, had no sooner

delivered the dangerous letter with which he had suffered himself to be

entrusted, than he was collared, and rewarded for his good-nature by a

severe and unexpected flagellation.

Ladies, it is likewise said, who had been forsaken, or otherwise

ungenteelly used by their admirers, when every other means of revenge

failed, would also recur to the ministry of the fathers of St. Lazare.

Either by making interest with other persons, or using some

artfully-contrived scheme, the provoked fair one endeavoured to have the

gentleman who caused her grief, inveigled into the house of the

seminary: at the same time she took care to have a letter to recommend

him, sent there from some unknown quarter, with proper fees in it; for

that was a point that must not be neglected: and when the gentleman came

afterwards to speak with the fathers, he was no sooner found by them,

either from the nature of the business he said he came upon, or other

marks, to be the person mentioned in the letter they had before

received, than they showed him into an adjoining room, where this

treacherous and deceitful lover was immediately seized, mastered, and

everything in short was performed that was requisite to procure ample

satisfaction to the fair injured lady.

It is also said (for a number of stories are related on that subject,

and the Seminary of St. Lazare was become for a while an object of

terror to all Paris) that schemes of the most abusive kind were in

latter times carried on, through the connivance which the fathers began

to show at the knavery of certain persons; and this indeed seems to be a

well-ascertained part of the story. Abuses of the same kind as those

which once prevailed in mad-houses established in this country, were at

last practised in the seminary. Men possessed of estates which some near

relations wanted to enjoy, or whom it was the interest of other persons

to keep for a while out of the way, were inveigled into the House of

Lazare, where they were detained, and large sums paid monthly for their

board.

History of flagellation among different nations · 第 30 / 33 题