FLAGELLATION CUSTOMS.—THE ROMANS.

The punishment of flagellation was also much in vogue among the Romans;

and it was the common chastisement which judges inflicted upon

offenders, especially upon those of a servile condition. Surrounded by

an apparatus of whips, scourges, and leather straps, they terrified

offenders, and brought them to a sense of their duty.

Judges, among the Romans, as has been just now mentioned, used a great

variety of instruments for inflicting the punishment of whipping. Some

consisted of a flat strap of leather, and were called _Ferulæ_; and to

be lashed with these _Ferulæ_, was considered as the mildest degree of

punishment. Others were made of a number of cords of twisted parchment,

and were called _Scuticæ_. These _Scuticæ_ were considered as being a

degree higher in point of severity than the _Ferulæ_, but were much

inferior in that respect, to that kind of scourge which was called

_Flagellum_, and sometimes the _Terrible Flagellum_, which was made of

thongs of ox-leather, the same as carmen used for their horses. We find

in the third satire of the first book of Horace, a clear and pretty

singular account of the gradation in point of severity that obtained

between the above-mentioned instruments of whipping. In this satire,

Horace lays down the rules which he thinks a judge ought to follow in

the discharge of his office; and he addressed himself, somewhat

ironically, to certain persons who, adopting the principles of the

Stoics, affected much severity in their opinions, and pretended that all

crimes whatever being equal, ought to be punished in the same manner.

“Make such a rule of conduct to yourself (says Horace) that you may

always proportion the chastisement you inflict to the magnitude of the

offence; and when the offender only deserves to be chastised with the

whip of twisted parchment, do not expose him to the lash of the horrid

leather scourge, for that you should only inflict the punishment of the

flat strap on him who deserves a more severe lashing, is what I am by no

means afraid of.”

The choice between these different kinds of instruments, was, as we may

conclude from the above passage, left to the judge, who ordered that to

be used which he was pleased to name; and the number of blows was

likewise left to his discretion; which sometimes were as many as the

executioner could give. “He (says Horace in one of his Odes) who has

been lashed by order of the Triumvirs, till the executioner was spent.”

Besides this extensive power of whipping exercised by judges among the

Romans, over persons of a servile condition over aliens, and those who

were the subjects of the republic, masters were possessed of an

unbounded one with regard to their slaves, over whose life and death

they had moreover an absolute power. Hence a great number of instruments

of flagellation, besides those above mentioned, were successively

brought into use for punishing slaves. Among those were particular kinds

of cords manufactured in Spain, as we learn from a passage in an Ode of

Horace, the same that has just been quoted, and was addressed to one

Menas, a freed-man, who had found means to acquire a great fortune, and

was grown very insolent. “Thou (says Horace) whose sides are still

discoloured (or burnt) with the stripes of the Spanish cords.”

A number of other instances of this practice of whipping slaves, as well

as other different names of instruments used for that purpose, may be

found in the ancient Latin writers, such as Plautus, Terence, Horace,

Martial, &c. So prevalent had the above practice become, that slaves

were frequently denominated from that particular kind of flagellation

which they were most commonly made to undergo. Some were called

_Restiones_, because they were used to be lashed with cords; others were

called _Bucædæ_, because they were usually lashed with thongs of

ox-leather; and it is in consequence of this custom, that a man is made

to say in one of Plautus’ plays, “they shall be _Bucædæ_ (that is to

say, scourged with leather thongs) whether they will or no, before I

content to be _Restio_,” or so much as beaten with cords. And

Tertullian, meaning in one of his writings to express slaves in general,

uses words which simply signify “those who are used to be beaten, or to

be discoloured with blows.”

Nay, so generally were whipping and lashing considered among the Romans,

as being the lot of slaves, that a whip, or a scourge, was become among

them the emblem of their condition. Of this we have an instance in the

singular custom mentioned by _Camerarius_, which prevailed among them,

of placing in the triumphal car, behind the Triumpher, a man with a whip

in his hand; the meaning of which was to show, that it was no impossible

thing for a man to fall from the highest pitch of glory into the most

abject condition, even into that of a slave.

Suetonius also relates a fact which affords another remarkable instance

of this notion of the Romans, of looking upon a whip as a characteristic

mark of dominion on the one hand, and of slavery on the other. “Cicero

(says Suetonius, in the life of Augustus) having accompanied Cæsar to

the Capitol, relates to a few friends whom he met there, a dream which

he had had the night before. It seemed to him, he said, that a graceful

boy came down from heaven, suspended by a golden chain; that he stopped

before the gate of the Capitol, and that Jupiter gave him a whip

(_flagellum_.) Having afterwards seen Augustus, whom (as he was still

personally unknown to several of his near relations) Cæsar had sent for

and brought along with him to be present at the ceremony, he assured his

friends that he was the very person whose figure he had seen during his

sleep.” Juvenal likewise, in one of his satires, has spoken of Augustus

conformably to the above notion of the Romans. “The same (says he) who,

after conquering the Romans, has subjected them to his whip.” But,

besides all those instruments of flagellation used for punishing slaves,

which have been mentioned above, and as if the terrible _flagellum_ had

not been of itself sufficiently so, new contrivances were used to make

the latter a still more cruel weapon; and the thongs with which that

kind of scourge was made, were frequently armed with nails, or small

hard bones. They also would sometimes fasten to those thongs small

leaden weights: hence scourges were sometimes called _Astragala_, as

Hesychius relates, from the name of those kind of weights which the

ancients used to wear hanging about their shoes. Under the tortures

which those different instruments inflicted, it was no wonder that

slaves should die: indeed this was a frequent case; and the cruelty,

especially of mistresses towards their female slaves, grew at last to

such a pitch, that a petition was made in the Council of Elvira to

restrain it; and it was ordained, that if any mistress should cause her

slave to be whipped with so much cruelty as that she should die, the

mistress should be suspended from communion for a certain number of

years. The following are the terms of the above ordinance, in the fifth

canon. “If a mistress, in a fit of anger and madness, shall lash her

female slave, or cause her to be lashed, in such a manner that she

expires before the third day, by reason of the torture she has

undergone; inasmuch as it is doubtful whether it has designedly

happened, or by chance; if it has designedly happened, the mistress

shall be excommunicated for seven years; if by chance, she shall be

excommunicated for five years only; though, if she fall into sickness,

she may receive the communion.”

History of flagellation among different nations · 第 6 / 33 题