But the little woman is irrepressible. Too fragile to come into

the fighting section of humanity--a puny creature whom one blow from a

man's huge fist could annihilate--absolutely fearless, and insolent

with the insolence which only those dare show who know that

retribution cannot follow--what can be done with her? She is afraid of

nothing and to be controlled by no one. Sheltered behind her weakness

as behind a triple shield of brass, the angriest man dare not touch

her, while she provokes him to a combat in which his hands are tied.

She gets her own way in everything and everywhere. At home and abroad

she is equally dominant and irrepressible, equally free from obedience

and from fear. Who breaks all the public order in sights and shows,

and, in spite of King, Kaiser, or Policeman X, goes where it is

expressly forbidden that she shall go? Not the large-boned, muscular

woman, whatever her temperament; unless, indeed, of the exceptionally

haughty type in distinctly inferior surroundings--and then she can

queen it royally enough and set everything at most lordly defiance.

But in general the large-boned woman obeys the orders given, because,

while near enough to man to be somewhat on a par with him, she is

still undeniably his inferior. She is too strong to shelter herself

behind her weakness, yet too weak to assert her strength and defy her

master on equal grounds. She is like a flying fish--not one thing

wholly; and while capable of the inconveniences of two lives is

incapable of the privileges of either. It is not she, for all her

well-developed frame and formidable looks, but the little woman, who

breaks the whole code of laws and defies all their defenders--the

pert, smart, pretty little woman, who laughs in your face and goes

straight ahead if you try to turn her to the right hand or to the

left, receiving your remonstrances with the most sublime indifference,

as if you were talking a foreign language she could not understand.

She carries everything before her, wherever she is. You may see her

stepping over barriers, slipping under ropes, penetrating to the green

benches with a red ticket, taking the best places on the platform over

the heads of their rightful owners, settling herself among the

reserved seats without an inch of pasteboard to float her. You cannot

turn her out by main force. British chivalry objects to the public

laying on of hands in the case of a woman, even when most recalcitrant

and disobedient; more particularly if she be a small and

fragile-looking woman. So that, if it be only a usurpation of places

specially masculine, she is allowed to retain what she has got, amid

the grave looks of the elders--not really displeased at the flutter of

her ribbons among them--and the titters and nudges of the young

fellows.

If the battle is between her and another woman, they are left to fight

it out as they best can, with the odds laid heavily on the little one.

All this time there is nothing of the tumult of contest about her.

Fiery and combative as she generally is, when breaking the law in

public places she is the very soul of serene daring. She shows no

heat, no passion, no turbulence; she leaves these as extra weapons of

defence to women who are assailable. For herself she requires no such

aids. She knows her capabilities and the line of attack that best

suits her, and she knows, too, that the fewer points of contest she

exposes the more likely she is to slip into victory; the more she

assumes and the less she argues, the slighter the hold she gives her

opponents. She is either perfectly good-humoured or blankly innocent;

she either smiles you into indulgence or wearies you into compliance

by the sheer hopelessness of making any impression on her. She may,

indeed, if of the very vociferous and shrill-tongued kind, burst out

into such a noisy demonstration as makes you glad to escape from her,

no matter what spoils you leave in her hands; just as a mastiff will

slink away from a bantam hen all heckled feathers and screeching

cackle and tremendous assumption of doing something terrible if he

does not look out. Any way the little woman is unconquerable; and a

tiny fragment of humanity at a public show, setting all rules and

regulations at defiance, is only carrying out in the matter of benches

the manner of life to which nature has dedicated her from the

beginning.

As a rule, the little woman is brave. When the lymphatic giantess

falls into a faint or goes off into hysterics, she storms, or bustles

about, or holds on like a game terrier, according to the work on hand.

She will fly at any man who annoys her, and she bears herself as

equal to the biggest and strongest fellow of her acquaintance. In

general she does it all by sheer pluck, and is not notorious for

subtlety or craft. Had Delilah been a little woman she would never

have taken the trouble to shear Samson's locks. She would have stood

up against him with all his strength untouched on his head, and she

would have overcome him too. Judith and Jael were both probably large

women. The work they went about demanded a certain strength of muscle

and toughness of sinew; but who can say that Jezebel was not a small,

freckled, auburn-haired Lady Audley of her time, full of the

concentrated fire, the electric force, the passionate recklessness of

her type? Regan and Goneril might have been beautiful demons of the

same pattern; we have the example of the Marchioness de Brinvilliers

as to what amount of spiritual devilry can exist with the face and

manner of an angel direct from heaven; and perhaps Cordelia was a tall

dark-haired girl, with a pair of brown eyes, and a long nose sloping

downwards.

Look at modern Jewesses, with their flashing Oriental orbs, their

night-black tresses and the dusky shadows of their olive-coloured

complexions. As catalogued properties according to the ideal, they

would be placed in the list of the natural criminals and law-breakers,

while in reality they are about as meek and docile a set of women as

are to be found within the four seas. Pit a fiery little Welsh woman

or a petulant Parisienne against the most regal and Junonic

amongst them, and let them try conclusions in courage, in energy, in

audacity; the Israelitish Juno will go down before either of the small

Philistines, and the fallacy of weight and colour in the generation of

power will be shown without the possibility of denial.

Even in those old days of long ago, when human characteristics were

embodied and deified, we do not find that the white-armed large-limbed

Hera, though queen by right of marriage, lorded it over her sister

goddesses by any superior energy or force of nature. On the contrary,

she was rather a heavy-going person, and, unless moved to anger by her

husband's numerous infidelities, took her Olympian life placidly

enough, and once or twice got cheated in a way that did no great

credit to her sagacity. A little Frenchwoman would have sailed round

her easily; and as it was, shrewish though she was in her speech when

provoked, her husband not only deceived but chastised her, and reduced

her to penitence and obedience as no little woman would have suffered

herself to be reduced.

There is one celebrated race of women who were probably the

powerfully-built, large-limbed creatures they are assumed to have

been, and as brave and energetic as they were strong and big--the

Norse women of the sagas, who, for good or evil, seem to have been a

very influential element in the old Northern life. Prophetesses;

physicians; dreamers of dreams and accredited interpreters as well;

endowed with magic powers; admitted to a share in the councils of

men; brave in war; active in peace; these fair-haired Scandinavian

women were the fit comrades of their men, the fit wives and mothers of

the Berserkers and the Vikings. They had no tame nor easy life of it,

if all we hear of them be true. To defend the farm and the homestead

during their husbands' absence, and to keep these and themselves

intact against all bold rovers to whom the Tenth Commandment was an

unknown law; to dazzle and bewilder by magic arts when they could not

conquer by open strength; to unite craft and courage, deception and

daring, loyalty and independence, demanded no small amount of opposing

qualities. But the Steingerdas and Gudrunas were generally equal to

any emergency of fate or fortune, and slashed their way through the

history of their time more after the manner of men than of women;

supplementing their downright blows by side thrusts of craftier

cleverness when they had to meet power with skill and were fain to

overthrow brutality by fraud. The Norse women were certainly as

largely framed as they were mentally energetic, and as crafty as

either; but we know of no other women who unite the same

characteristics and are at once cunning, strong, brave and true.

On the whole, then, the little women have the best of it. More petted

than their bigger sisters, and infinitely more powerful, they have

their own way in part because it really does not seem worth while

to contest a point with such little creatures. There is nothing that

wounds a man's self-respect in any victory they may get or claim.

Where there is absolute inequality of strength, there can be no

humiliation in the self-imposed defeat of the stronger; and as it is

always more pleasant to have peace than war, and as big men for the

most part rather like than not to put their necks under the tread of

tiny feet, the little woman goes on her way triumphant to the end;

breaking all the laws she does not like and throwing down all the

barriers which impede her progress; irresistible and irrepressible in

all circumstances and under any conditions.

_IDEAL WOMEN._

It is often objected against fault-finders, writers or others, that

they destroy but do not build up; that while industriously blaming

errors they take good care not to praise the counteracting virtues;

that in their zeal against the vermin of which they are seeking to

sweep the house clean they forget the nobler creatures which do the

good work of keeping things sweet and wholesome. But it is impossible

to be continually introducing the saving clause, 'all are not so bad

as these.' The seven thousand righteous who have not bowed the knee to

Baal are understood to exist in all communities; and, vicious as any

special section may be, there must always be the hidden salt and

savour of the virtuous to keep the whole from falling into utter

corruption.

This is specially true of modern women. Certainly some of them are as

unsatisfactory as any of their kind who have ever appeared on earth

before; but it would be very queer logic to infer therefore that all

are bad alike, and that our modern womanhood is as ill off as the

Cities of the Plain, which could not be saved for want of the ten just

men to save them. Happily, we have noble women among us yet;

women who believe in something besides pleasure, and who do their work

faithfully, wherever it may lie; women who can and do sacrifice

themselves for love and duty, and who do not think they were sent into

the world simply to run one mad life-long race for wealth, for

dissipation, for distinction. But the life of such women is

essentially in retirement; and though the lesson they teach is

beautiful, yet its influence is necessarily confined, because of the

narrow sphere of the teacher. When public occasions for devotedness

occur, we in some sort measure the extent to which the self-sacrifice

of women can be carried; but in general their noblest virtues come out

only in the quiet sacredness of home, and the most heroic lives of

patience and well-doing go on in seclusion, uncheered by sympathy and

unrewarded by applause.

Still, it is impossible to write of one absolute womanly ideal--one

single type that shall satisfy every man's fancy; for, naturally, what

would be perfection to one is imperfection to another, according to

the special bent of the individual mind. Thus one man's ideal of

womanly perfection is in beauty, mere physical outside beauty; and not

all the virtues under heaven could warm him into love with red hair or

a snub nose. He is entirely happy if his wife be undeniably the

handsomest woman of his acquaintance, and holds himself blessed when

all men admire and all women envy. But he is blessed for his own

sake rather than for hers. Pleasant as her loveliness is to look on,

it is pleasanter to know that he is the possessor of it. The

'handsomest woman in the room' comes into the same category as the

finest picture or the most thoroughbred horse within his sphere; and

if the degree of pride in his possession be different, the kind is the

same. And so in minor proportions--from the most beautiful woman of

all, to simply beauty as a _sine quâ non_, whatever else may be

wanting. One other thing only is as absolute as this beauty, and that

is its undivided possession.

Another man's ideal is a good housekeeper and a careful mother; and he

does not care a rush whether his wife, if she is these, be pretty or

ugly. Provided she is active and industrious, minds the house well,

brings up the children as they ought to be brought up, has good

principles, is trustworthy and even-tempered, he is not particular as

to colour or form, and can even be brought to tolerate a limp or a

squint. Given the broad foundations of an honourable home, and he will

forego the lath and plaster of personal appearance which will not bear

the wear and tear of years and their troubles. The solid virtues

stand. His balance at the banker's is a fact; his good name and credit

with the tradespeople are facts; so is the comfort of his home; so are

the health, the morals, the education of his children. All these are

the true realities of life to him; but the beauty which changes to

deformity by small-pox, which fades under dyspepsia, grows stale

by habit, and is worn threadbare by the end of twenty years, is only a

skin-deep grace which he does not value. Perhaps he is right.

Certainly, some of the happiest marriages amongst one's acquaintances

are those where the wife has not one perceptible physical charm, and

where the whole force of her magnetic value lies in what she is, not

in how she looks.

Another man wants a tender, adoring, fair-haired seraph, who will

worship him as a demigod and accept him as her best revelation of

strength and wisdom. The more dependent she is, the better he will

love her; the less of conscious thought, of active will, of

originative power she has, the greater will be his regard and

tenderness. To be the one sole teacher and protector of such a gentle

little creature seems to him the most delicious joy and the best

condition of married life; and he holds Milton's famous lines to be

expressive of the only fitting relations between men and women. The

adoring seraph is his ideal; Griselda, Desdemona, Lucy Ashton, are his

highest culminations of womanly grace; and the qualities which appeal

the most powerfully to his generosity are the patience which will not

complain, the gentleness that cannot resent, and the love which

nothing can chill.

Another man wants a cultivated intelligence in his ideal. As an

author, an artist, a student, a statesman, he would like his wife to

be able to help him by the contact of bright wit and ready intellect.

He believes in the sex of minds, and holds no work complete which

has not been created by the one and perfected by the other. He sees

how women have helped on the leaders in troublous times; he knows that

almost all great men have owed something of their greatness to the

influence of a mother or a wife; he remembers how thoughts which had

lain dumb and dormant in men's brains for more than half their

lifetime have suddenly wakened up into speech and activity by the

influence of a woman great enough to call them forth. The adoring

seraph would be an encumbrance and nothing better than a child on his

hands; and the soul which had to be awakened and directed by him would

run great chance of remaining torpid and inactive all its days. He has

his own life to lead and round off; and, so far from wishing to

influence another's, he wants to be helped for himself.

Another man cares only for the birth and social position of the woman

to whom he gives his name and affection. To another yellow gold stands

higher than blue blood, and 'my wife's father' may have been a

rag-picker, so long as rag-picking had been distilled in a

sufficiently rich alembic leaving a residuum admitting no kind of

doubt. Venus herself without a dowry would be only a pretty seaside

girl with a Newtown pippin in her hand; but Miss Kilmansegg would be

something worth thinking of, if but little worth looking at.

One man delights in a smart, vivacious little woman of the

irrepressible kind. It makes no difference to him how petulant

she is, how full of fire and fury; the most passionate bursts of

temper simply amuse him, like the anger of a canary-bird, and he holds

it fine fun to watch the small virago in her tantrums, and to set her

going again when he thinks she has been a long enough time in

subsidence. His ideal of woman is an amusing little plaything, with a

great facility for being put up, and a dash of viciousness to give it

piquancy. Another wants a sweet and holy saint whose patient humility

springs from principle rather than from fear; another likes a

blithe-tempered, healthy girl with no nonsense about her, full of fun

and ready for everything, and he is not particular as to the strict

order or economy of the housekeeping, provided only his wife is at all

times willing to be his pleasant playmate and companion. Another

delights in something very quiet, very silent, very home-staying. One

must have first-rate music in his ideal woman; another, unimpeachable

taste; a third, strict order; a fourth, liberal breadth of nature; and

each has his own ideal, not only of nature but of person--to the exact

shade of the hair, the colour of the eyes and the oval of the face.

But all agree in the great fundamental requirements of truth and

modesty and love and unselfishness; for though it is impossible to

write of one womanly ideal as an absolute, it is very possible to

detail the virtues which ought to belong to all alike.

If this diversity of ideals be true of individuals, it is especially

true of nations, each of which has its own ideal woman varying

according to what is called the genius of the country. To the

Frenchman, if we are to believe Michelet and the novelists, it is a

feverish little creature, full of nervous energy but without muscular

force; of frail health and feeble organization; a prey to morbid

fancies which she has no strength to control nor yet to resist; now

weeping away her life in the pain of finding that her husband--a man

gross and material because husband--does not understand her, now

sighing over her delicious sins in the arms of the lover who does;

without reasoning faculties but with divine intuitions which are as

good as revelations; without cool judgment but with the light of

burning passions which guide her just as well; thinking by her heart

and carrying the most refined metaphysics into her love; subtle;

incomprehensible by the coarser brains of men and women who are only

honest; a creature born to bewilder and to be misled, to love and to

be adored, to madden men and to be destroyed by them.

It does not much signify that the reality is a shrewd, calculating,

unromantic woman, with a hard face and keen eyes, who for the most

part makes a good practical wife to her common-sense middle-aged

husband, who thinks more of her social position than of her feelings,

more of her children than of her lovers, more of her purse than of her

heart, and whose great object of life is a daily struggle for

centimes. It pleases the French to idealize their eminently practical

and worldly-wise women into this queer compound of hysterics and

adultery; and if it pleases them it need not displease us. To the

German his ideal is of two kinds--one, his Martha, the domestic

broad-faced _Hausmutter_, who cooks good dinners at small cost, and

mends the family linen as religiously as if this were the Eleventh

Commandment specially appointed for feminine fingers to keep, the

poetic culmination of whom is Charlotte cutting bread and butter; the

other, his Mary, his Bettina, full of mind and æsthetics and

heart-uplifting love, yearning after the infinite with holes in her

stockings and her shoes down at heel. For what are coarse material

mendings to the æsthetic soul yearning after the Infinite and

worshipping at the feet of the prophet?

In Italy the ideal woman of late times was the ardent patriot, full of

active energy, of physical force, of dauntless courage. In Poland it

is the patriot too, but of a more refined and etherealized type,

passively resenting Tartar tyranny by the subtlest feminine scorn, and

living in perpetual music and mourning. In Spain it is a woman

beautiful and impassioned, with the slight drawback of needing a world

of looking after, of which the men are undeniably capable. In

Mohammedan countries generally it is a comely smooth-skinned Dudù,

patient and submissive, always in good humour with her master,

economical in house-living to please the meanness, and gorgeous in

occasional attire to gratify the ostentation, of the genuine Oriental;

but by no means Dudù ever asleep and unoccupied. For, if not

allowed to take part in active outside life, the Eastern's wife or

wives have their home duties and their maternal cares like all other

women, and find to their cost that, if they unduly neglect them, they

will have a bad time of it with Ali Ben Hassan when the question comes

of piastres and sequins, and the dogs of Jews who demand payment, and

the pigs of Christians who follow suit.

The American ideal is of two kinds, like the German--the one, the

clever manager, the woman with good executive faculty in the matters

of buckwheat cakes and oyster gumbo, as is needed in a country so

poorly provided with 'helps;' the other, the aspiring soul who puts

her aspirations into deeds, and goes out into the world to do battle

with the sins of society as editress, preacher, stump-orator and the

like. It must be rather embarrassing to some men that this special

manifestation of the ideal woman at times advocates miscegenation and

free love; but perhaps we of the narrow old conventional type are not

up to the right mark yet, and have to wait until our own women are

thoroughly emancipated before we can rightly appreciate these

questions. At all events, if this kind of thing pleases the Americans,

it is no more our business to interfere with them than with the French

compound; and if miscegenation and free love seem to them the right

manner of life, let them follow it.

In all countries, then, the ideal woman changes, chameleon-like, to

suit the taste of men; and the great doctrine that her happiness

does somewhat depend on his liking is part of the very foundation of

her existence. According to his will she is bond or free, educated or

ignorant, lax or strict, housekeeping or roving; and though we

advocate neither the bondage nor the ignorance, yet we do hold to the

principle that, by the laws which regulate all human communities

everywhere, she is bound to study the wishes of man and to mould her

life in harmony with his liking. No society can get on in which there

is total independence of sections and members, for society is built up

on the mutual dependence of all its sections and all its members.

Hence the defiant attitude which women have lately assumed, and their

indifference to the wishes and remonstrances of men, cannot lead to

any good results whatever. It is not the revolt of slaves against

their tyrants which they have begun--in that we could sympathize--but

it is a revolt against their duties.

The Girl of the Period, and Other Social Essays, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 3 / 19 段