This great problem of love continues to be full of contradictory aspects

to those who would explore it. We distinguish between divine love and

human love, but have yet to decide whether Love absolute is divine or

human; for this deity is known to us from all time in two opposite

shapes,--as a destructive and as a constructive god. He unmakes the man,

he unmakes the woman, sucks up precious years of human life like a

sponge, sets Troy ablaze, maddens harmless Io with a stinging gad-fly.

On the other hand, where Love is not, nothing is. Luxurious Solomon

praises a dinner of herbs enriched by his presence. All poetry, all

doctrine, is founded upon human affection assumed as essential to life,

nay, as life itself; for when love of life and its objects exists not,

the vital flame flickers feebly, and expires early. In ethics, social

and religious, what contradictions do we encounter under this head! From

all inordinate and sinful affections, good Lord, deliver us! is a good

prayer. But how shall we treat the case when there are no affections at

all? We might add a clause to our litany,--From lovelessness and all

manner of indifference, good Lord, deliver us! What more direful

sentence than to say that a person has no heart? What sin more severely

punished than any extravagant action of this same heart?

These wonders of lofty sentiment and high imagination are precious

subjects of study. The construction of a great poem, of which the

interest is at once intense, various, and sustained, seems to us a work

more appropriate to other days than to our own. I remember in my youth a

fluent critic who was fond of saying that if Milton had lived in this

day of the world, he would not have thought of writing an epic poem. To

which another of the same stripe would reply: "If he did write such a

poem in these days, nobody would read it." I wonder how long the frisky

impatience of our youth will think it worth while to follow even Homer

in his long narratives.

More than this sustained power of the imagination, does the heroic in

sentiment seem to decrease and to be wanting among us. Those lofty views

of human affection and relation which we find in the great poets seem

almost foreign to the civilization of to-day. I find in modern

scepticism this same impatience of weighty thoughts. He who believes

only in the phenomenal universe does not follow a conviction. A fatal

indolence of mind prevents him from following any lead which threatens

fatigue and difficult labor. Instead of a temple for the Divine, our man

of to-day builds a commodious house for himself,--at best, a club-house

for his set or circle. And the worst of it is, that he teaches his son

to do the same thing.

The social change which I notice to-day as a decline in attachments

simply personal is partly the result of a political change which I, for

one, cannot deplore. The idea of the state and of society as bodies in

which each individual has a direct interest gives to men and women of

to-day an enlarged sphere of action and of instruction. The absolutely

universal coincidence of the real advantage of the individual with that

of the community, always true in itself, and neither now nor at any time

fully comprehended, gives the fundamental tone to thought and education

to-day. The result is a tendency to generality, to publicity, and a

neglect of those relations into which external power and influence do

not enter. The action of mind upon mind, of character upon character,

outside of public life, is intense, intimate, insensible. Temperament is

most valued nowadays for its effect upon multitudes. We wish to be

recognized as moving in a wide and exalted sphere. The belle in the

ball-room is glad to have it reported that the Prince of Wales admires

her. The lady who should grace a lady's sphere pines for the stage and

the footlights. Actions and appearances are calculated to be seen of

men.

I say no harm of this tendency, which has enfranchised me and many

others from the cruel fetters of a narrow and personal judgment. It is

safe and happy to have the public for a final court of appeal, and to be

able, when an issue is misjudged or distorted, to call upon its great

heart to say where the right is, and where the wrong. But let us, in our

panorama of wide activities, keep with all the more care these pictures

of spirits that have been so finely touched within the limits of

Nature's deepest reserve and modesty. This mediæval did not go to

dancing-school nor to Harvard College. He could not talk of the fellows

and the girls. But from his early childhood, he holds fast the tender

remembrance of a beautiful and gracious face. The thought of it, and of

the high type of woman which it images, is to him more fruitful of joy

and satisfaction than the amusements of youth or the gaieties of the

great world. Death removes this beloved object from his sight, but not

from his thoughts. Years pass. His genius reaches its sublime maturity.

He becomes acquainted with camps and courts, with the learning and the

world of his day. But when, with all his powers, he would build a

perfect monument to Truth, he takes her perfect measure from the hand of

his child-love. The world keeps that work, and will keep it while

literature shall last. It has many a subtle passage, many a wonderful

picture, but at its height, crowned with all names divine, he has

written, as worthy to be remembered with these, the name of Beatrice.

PRINTED AT THE EVERETT PRESS BOSTON MASS.

End of Project Gutenberg's Is Polite Society Polite?, by Julia Ward Howe

Is Polite Society Polite? and Other Essays · 第 10 / 10 段