SECTION 3

_In a Special Danger Zone?_

THE GERMAN THREAT

Sir,--It may perhaps be desirable, for the benefit of the general

reader, to distinguish clearly between the two topics dealt with in the

recent announcement of German naval policy.

1. We find in it what may, at first sight, suggest the establishment of

a gigantic "paper blockade," such as was proclaimed in the Berlin Decree

of 1806, stating that "Les îles Britanniques sont déclarées en état de

blocus." But in the new decree the term "blockade" does not occur, nor

is there any indication of an intention to comply with the prescriptions

of the Declaration of Paris of 1856 as to the mode in which such an

operation must be conducted. What we really find in the announcement is

the specification of certain large spaces of water, including the whole

of the British Channel, within which German ships will endeavour to

perpetrate the atrocities about to be mentioned.

2. These promised, and already perpetrated, atrocities consist in the

destruction of merchant shipping without any of those decent preliminary

steps, for the protection of human life and neutral property, which are

insisted on by long established rules of international law. Under these

rules, the exercise of violence against a merchant vessel is

permissible, in the first instance, only in case of her attempting by

resistance or flight to frustrate the right of visit which belongs to

every belligerent cruiser. Should she obey the cruiser's summons to

stop, and allow its officers to come on board, they will satisfy

themselves, by examination of her papers, and, if necessary, by further

search, of the nationality of ship and cargo, of the destination of

each, and of the character of the latter. They will then decide whether

or no they should make prize of the ship, and in some cases may feel

justified in sending a prize to the bottom, instead of taking her into

port. Before doing so it is their bounden duty to preserve the ship

papers, and, what is far more important, to provide for the safety of

all on board.

This procedure seems to have been followed, more or less, by the

submarines which sank the _Durward_ in the North Sea, and several small

vessels near the Mersey, but is obviously possible to such craft only

under very exceptional circumstances. It was scandalously not followed

in the cases of the _Tokomaru_, the _Ikaria_, and the hospital ship (!)

_Asturias_, against which a submarine fired torpedoes, off Havre,

without warning or inquiry, and, of course, regardless of the fate of

those on board. The threat that similar methods of attack will be

systematically employed, on a large scale, on and after the 18th inst.,

naturally excites as much indignation among neutrals as among the Allies

of the Entente.

I am, Sir, your obedient servant,

T. E. HOLLAND.

Oxford, February 12 (1915).

* * * * *

Letters to "The Times" upon War and Neutrality (1881-1920) · 第 3 / 17 章