CHAPTER IX

1859

First public performances of the Pianoforte Concerto in Hanover,

Leipzig, and Hamburg--Brahms, Joachim, and Stockhausen appear

together in Hamburg--First public performance of the Serenade in D

major--Ladies' Choir--Fräulein Friedchen Wagner--Compositions for

women's chorus.

It is not difficult to realize something of the mingled feelings of hope

and anxiety that must have filled the mind of Johannes on his arrival in

Hanover in January, 1859. If the first chapter of his career had closed

in triumphant fashion with the extraordinary series of events that

followed his first little concert-journey, the second chapter can only

be regarded as an intermezzo which was spent in quiet preparation for

what was to succeed it. The prelude of his artistic life had been

successfully completed in 1853; the main action was to begin with the

performances in Hanover and Leipzig in the opening month of 1859. Brahms

was almost extravagantly self-critical, but he must have felt encouraged

when he remembered the substantial success of his début as a composer at

Leipzig immediately after the appearance of Schumann's famous article,

and he knew that he had now attained a much more advanced stage of

capacity. Such considerations, combined with the enthusiasm of his best

friends, may well have raised his hopes high.

The concerto was heard at Hanover on January 22 under the most

favourable conditions. Joachim conducted the orchestra, Johannes played

the solo, and it would be hard to say which of the two young musicians

was the more interested in the occasion, but the result of the

performance was that the public was wearied and the musicians puzzled.

'The work had no great success with the public,' reported the

Hanover correspondent of the _Signale_ ten days later, 'but'--and

we seem to read the promptings of a Joachim in the following

words--'it aroused the decided respect and sympathy of the best

musicians for the gifted artist.'

'The work, with all its serious striving, its rejection of

triviality, its skilled instrumentation, seemed difficult to

understand, even dry, and in parts eminently fatiguing,' said

another critic;[76] 'nevertheless Brahms gave the impression of

being a really sterling musician, and it was conceded without

reservation that he is not merely a virtuoso, but a great artist of

pianoforte-playing.'

Johannes had to leave immediately for Leipzig, and he started from

Hanover without knowing more about the impression produced there by his

concerto than could be gathered from the reserve of the audience and the

enthusiasm of his friend, but that his frame of mind was not despondent

may be inferred from a paragraph which appeared in the _Signale_

immediately after his arrival.

'Herr Johannes Brahms is here, and will play his Concerto at the

Gewandhaus concert of the 27th. He thinks of remaining the rest of

the winter at Leipzig.'

It is necessary to remind the reader what kind of audience it was for

whose acceptance our young composer was now about to submit his work.

Leipzig still occupied the position of musical capital of Europe to

which it had been raised by the genius of Mendelssohn. By the most

influential of its artistic circles, the premature death of this

fascinating master (1809-1847) was still deplored as an almost recent

event. Most of his old friends were living, and, in virtue of their

former personal association with him, looked upon themselves as

competent judges of all later aspirants to fame. It is matter of daily

experience that the uninformed satellites of a man of genius are

arrogant in proportion to their ignorance, and that even professional

adepts of sincerity are apt to allow their horizon to be limited by

their hero-worship. Musicians and amateurs, alike, of the Gewandhaus

circle associated the idea of a concerto with the clear melody of Mozart

and Beethoven, still, perhaps, regarding Beethoven as a little difficult

to understand, with the attractive sparkle of Mendelssohn and with the

opportunity for a display of the soloist's virtuosity afforded more or

less by the works of all three masters. If asked to listen to a novelty,

they expected that it should not be too unlike what they had heard

before to be difficult to follow. Bernsdorf, newly appointed to succeed

Brahms' friendly critic, Louis Köhler, on the staff of the conservative

_Signale_, was himself a conservative of the most obstinate type, in

some respects resembling the English J. W. Davison of the _Times_ and

the _Musical World_, who was honestly convinced that the series of great

masters had closed with Mendelssohn.

On the other hand, the New-Germans had by this time made considerable

conquests in Leipzig, where they had established an important party

organization, and had, as we have seen in an earlier chapter, even been

admitted on trial to the platform of the Gewandhaus. The _Neue

Zeitschrift_ was their organ, but they had supporters also amongst the

journalists of the daily press, Ferdinand Gleich, of the _Leipziger

Tagblatt_, being one of the principal. They were on the look-out for

champions who would rally to their cause, and welcomed the unusual as

such, though reserving their heartiest approval for the piquant,

sounding, sensational, or even revolutionary.

To these two bodies of extremists our Johannes, with his inexperience,

his ideal aims, his genius, and his dislike of the sensational, was now

to appeal. Had he been compelled at the moment to declare for either

party, he certainly would not have chosen the side of revolution. But he

was gifted with an imagination at once profound, original, and romantic.

This sealed his fate with the men who considered themselves the modern

representatives of classic art. The day after the concert he wrote to

Joachim to announce--'a brilliant and decided failure.'

'In the first place,' he says, 'it really went very well; I played

much better than in Hanover, and the orchestra capitally. The first

rehearsal aroused no feeling whatever, either in the musicians or

hearers. No hearers came, however, to the second, and not a muscle

moved on the countenance of either of the musicians. In the evening

Cherubini's Elisa overture was given, and then an Ave Maria of his

uninterestingly sung, so I hoped Pfund's (the drummer's) roll would

come at the right time.[77] The first movement and the second were

heard without a sign. At the end three hands attempted to fall

slowly one upon the other, upon which a quite audible hissing from

all sides forbade such demonstrations. There is nothing else to

write about the event, for no one has yet said a syllable to me

about the work, David excepted, who was very kind....

'This failure has made no impression at all upon me, and the slight

feeling of disappointment and flatness disappeared when I heard

Haydn's C minor Symphony and the Ruins of Athens. In spite of all

this, the concerto will please some day when I have improved its

construction, and a second shall sound different.

'I believe it is the best thing that could happen to me; it makes

one pull one's thoughts together and raises one's spirit.... But

the hissing was too much?...

'The faces here looked dreadfully insipid when I came from Hanover,

and was accustomed to seeing yours. Monday (January 31) I am going

to Hamburg. There is interesting church music here on Sunday, and

in the evening Faust at Frau Frege's.'[78]

The grimness of the young composer's disappointment may be read between

these Spartan lines. But perhaps he has exaggerated his failure. Let us

see what Bernsdorf has to say.

'It is sad, but true; new works do not succeed in Leipzig. Again at

the fourteenth Gewandhaus concert was a composition borne to the

grave. This work, however, cannot give pleasure. Save its serious

intention, it has nothing to offer but waste, barren dreariness

truly disconsolate. Its invention is neither attractive nor

agreeable.... And for more than three-quarters of an hour must one

endure this rooting and rummaging, this dragging and drawing, this

tearing and patching of phrases and flourishes! Not only must one

take in this fermenting mass; one must also swallow a dessert of

the shrillest dissonances and most unpleasant sounds. With

deliberate intention, Herr Brahms has made the pianoforte part of

his concerto as uninteresting as possible; it contains no effective

treatment of the instrument, no new and ingenious passages, and

wherever something appears which gives promise of effect, it is

immediately crushed and suffocated by a thick crust of orchestral

accompaniment. It must be observed, finally, that Herr Brahms'

pianoforte technique does not satisfy the demands we have a right

to make of a concert-player of the present day.'

Nothing could be more representative than these lines, of the

conscientious bigotry which almost always opposes what is really

original, though it is expressed by Bernsdorf with exceptional

coarseness. The narrowly orthodox antagonists of Brahms' art resembled

those who had levelled their shafts against Beethoven and Schumann each

in their day. The young composer fared differently at the hands of the

progressists. The _Neue Zeitschrift_ wrote:

'The appearance of Johannes Brahms with a new concerto was bound to

attract our especial attention. In the first place, on account of

the hopes entertained of an artist who had been introduced in a

most exceptional manner, even before his first appearance, by the

enthusiastic words of a revered master; and secondly, from the

rarity of his subsequent public announcements and the retirement in

which he has lived.

'Notwithstanding its undeniable want of outward effect, we regard

the poetic contents of the concerto as an unmistakable sign of

significant and original creative power; and, in face of the

belittling criticisms of a certain portion of the public and press,

we consider it our duty to insist on the admirable sides of the

work, and to protest against the not very estimable manner in which

judgment has been passed upon it.'

Ferdinand Gleich writes:

'Who would or could ignore in this new work the tokens of an

eminent creative endowment! We least of all who regard it as our

duty to encourage young talent. Many doubts, however, suggested

themselves as we listened to this concert-piece in large form.

This work again suggests a condition of indefiniteness and

fermentation, a wrestling for a method of expression commensurate

with the ideas of the composer, which has indeed broken through the

form of tradition, but has not yet constructed another sufficiently

definite and rounded to satisfy the demands of the æsthetics of

art.... The first movement, especially, gives us the impression of

monstrosity; this was less the case with the two others, although

even there we were not able, in spite of the beauties they contain,

to feel real artistic enjoyment. Brahms places the orchestra, as

far as is possible in a concert-piece, by the side of the obligato

instrument, and by so doing establishes himself as an artist who

understands the requirements of the new era. The treatment of the

orchestra shows a blooming fancy and the most vivid feeling for new

and beautiful tone effects, although the composer has not yet

sufficient command over his means to do justice to his intentions.

The work was received calmly, not to say coldly, by the public; we,

however, must acknowledge the eminent talent of the composer, of

whom, though he is still too much absorbed in his _Sturm und Drang_

period, it is not difficult to predict the accomplishment of

something great.'

Whether or not these two reviews were penned with a deliberate

purpose--and a desire on the part of the supporters of the New-German

school to identify Brahms with their cause can hardly be regarded as

either remarkable or dishonourable--no trace is to be found in either of

the insincerity attributed by Kalbeck, in his Life of Brahms, to the

journalistic partisans of the Weimarites, and especially to Brendel,

editor of the _Zeitschrift_ and friend of Liszt. Their honesty of

purpose, as well as their liberality of view, has been vindicated by the

fate which for many years attended the published concerto, and again we

may place the remarks of Hanslick, the avowed champion of classical art

and the enthusiastic admirer of the mature Brahms, beside those

published in the _Zeitschrift_ of the fifties. Writing in 1888, he

says:[79]

'Brahms began, like Schumann, in _Sturm und Drang_, but he was much

more daring and wild, more emancipated in respect to form and

modulation. The fermentation period of his genius, which is

generally supposed to have closed with his Op. 10 (Ballades for

pianoforte), should, perhaps, be extended ... does it not include

the D minor Concerto, with its wild genius?'

It has, indeed, taken nearly half a century to establish the concerto in

a secure position of public acceptance, and the day, though now probably

not far distant, has not even yet arrived when it can be said to rank as

a prime favourite amongst compositions of its class with the large body

of music-lovers.

Conceived as part of a symphony, the first movement of the work is

symphonic in character, though, as Spitta has pointed out, not in form.

The desire attributed to the composer by Ferdinand Gleich and by many

others since, to create a new form, to compose a symphonic work with a

pianoforte obligato, did not exist. Brahms simply wished to use what he

had already written, and did not feel that the time had come when he

could successfully complete a symphony. He rewrote his first two

movements, therefore, as we have noted, making room in them for a

pianoforte solo, put away the third movement, and composed a new finale.

How successfully he accomplished his task is to-day apparent to

accustomed ears, for which the first movement, though it contains slight

deviations from traditional concerto form, has no moment of obscurity.

The imagination of this portion of the work is colossal. It has

something Miltonic in its character, and seems to suggest to the mind

issues more tremendous and universal than the tragedy of Schumann's

fate, with which it must be associated. No one will assert that it

contains what are termed 'brilliant pianoforte passages,' the very

existence of which is unthinkable in a movement of such exalted poetic

grandeur; but that its performance brings due reward to capable

interpreters has been proved by the enthusiasm of many a latter-day

audience. After all that has been said, the reader will have no

difficulty in understanding the fervent intensity of mood which impelled

the composition of the slow movement, or in realizing something of the

emotions which suggested the motto, _Benedictus qui venit in nomine

Domini_, written above it in the original manuscript (in Joachim's

possession) by Brahms. In the finale, the difficult task of creating

something which should relieve the tension of feeling induced by the

preceding movements, without impairing the unity of the concerto as a

whole, has been well achieved. If it is somewhat more sombre in colour

than the usually accepted finale in rondo form, it is abundant in vigour

and impulse, whilst, on the other hand, though written with a view to

the concert-room, it never descends towards the trivialities of mere

outward glitter.

Much more might be said in explanation of the dubious position so long

occupied in the world of art by this great work of genius. We may not,

however, linger longer over such interesting matters. It is enough to

say that the purpose expressed by Brahms in his letter to Joachim, of

'pulling his thoughts together,' was literally carried out, and that his

development proceeded in the direction it had already taken, which was

the very opposite of that pursued by the adherents of the New-German

school. It consisted in the still closer concentration of his powers

within the forms of tradition, and the rapidity with which he attained

to complete and free mastery over musical structure is marked by the

production--soon to be recorded--of the first of the great series of

chefs-d'oeuvre of chamber music which have set his name, in this

particular domain of art, as high as that of Beethoven himself.

Unrecognised by the public and misunderstood by the academics of

Leipzig, whose sympathies he seems particularly, though for many years

vainly, to have desired to gain, our young musician had now no choice

but to return to his home and pupils at Hamburg. If, however, he himself

felt at all despondent at the failure of his hopes, his friends were

determined about the future of his work. Prompted and backed up by

Joachim, Avé Lallement, who was a member of the Philharmonic committee,

persuaded the directors to engage composer and concerto for their

concert of March 24. Joachim had written to Avé:

'DEAR FRIEND,

'Nearer acquaintance with Brahms' concerto inspires me with

increasing love and respect. The most intelligent people amongst

the public and the orchestra (of Leipzig) with whom I have spoken

express a high opinion of Brahms as a musician, and even those who

do not like the concerto are at one as to his eminent playing. I

have never expected anything else than that prejudice on the one

hand, and, on the other, astonishment at an individuality which

surrenders itself so unreservedly to the ideal as that of our

friend, should present some impediment to the brilliancy of his

success. A few places in the composition which, though good in

themselves, are too much spun out may also here and there disturb

one's enjoyment. Nevertheless, one may say that the concerto has

had a success honourable alike to artist and public; the same in

Hanover. Now let fault-finders and malicious detractors gossip as

they please--I don't mind; we have done right.... Now do as you

like in Hamburg, but if you give the concerto at the Philharmonic I

will come and conduct. That has long been settled.'[80]

The concert was made into a musical event of unusual importance by the

engagement of Joachim and of Stockhausen--his first appearance in

Hamburg; and public interest was increased by the advertisement of a

concert in the joint names of Brahms, Joachim, and Stockhausen to take

place on the 28th, which was to be signalized by the first public

performance of the newly composed Serenade in D major. That Johannes had

taken heart again after his disappointments, and was looking forward

with pleasure to the visits of his friends, is evident from a letter

written by him a few days beforehand to the lady in waiting on the

Princess Friederike of Lippe-Detmold.

'VERY ESTEEMED, GRACIOUS FRÄULEIN,

'In the first place I beg you to express my most humble thanks to

Her Serene Highness the Princess Friederike for the despatch of the

new Bach work.

'How often this present will remind me in the most agreeable manner

of Her Highness's kindness. You know how I love the divine master,

and may imagine that his tones (so dreaded by you) will often be

heard here.

'I am glad that Her Serene Highness continues to work so

industriously at her music, and only wish I could help her in some

way.

'In the trio mentioned by you[81] the most simple way is that the

left hand (which ceases playing) should help the poor right. For

what embarrassment the mischievous arrogance of the composer is

responsible!

'The day after to-morrow I play my pianoforte concerto here, and a

few days later introduce other works at a concert of my own.

Joachim and Stockhausen, who are coming for it, will make the days

into real musical festivals.

'In spite of the great diversity of opinions expressed about my

works, I have reason to be quite satisfied with my first attempts

for orchestra, and I confidently hope that they will find friendly

hearers in Detmold also.

'And I may venture to hope, above all, for later ripening and

better swelling fruits....'[82]

The Philharmonic committee had no reason to regret their arrangements.

The attraction of the two great names filled their concert-room to

suffocation. Every seat and every standing-place was occupied, and

crowds were turned from the doors. Those who have witnessed similar

scenes during--how many decades! can picture the excited expectancy that

followed the performance of a Cherubini overture, the thunder of welcome

at the first glimpse of Joachim, the never-ending applause and recalls

at the conclusion of his first solo, Spohr's 'Gesang-Scena,' the

sensation of Stockhausen's first appearance, the magnificent success of

his performance of a great aria from his oratorio répertoire. Then a

lull, the disappearance of Capellmeister Grund, the opening of the

piano, the reappearance of Joachim, this time to take his stand at the

conductor's desk, and the entrance of the slight, blonde young

Hamburger, pale and nervous, but calm and self-controlled, almost happy

in the support of his two friends.

On such an evening of enthusiasm, what public could have refused its

tribute to the young fellow-citizen who came before them as a composer

practically for the first time, with two heroes at his side to champion

his cause? Johannes was really successful. 'The concerto created an

impression, and excited applause far beyond that of a mere _succès

d'estime_,' and the critic of the _Nachrichten_ records the fact with

the more satisfaction from its contrast with the result of the

performance at the Leipzig Gewandhaus.

It would appear from the wording of the letter to Detmold quoted on a

foregoing page that the concert of the 28th, advertised in the three

names, had been arranged for Brahms' benefit. Ten years had elapsed

since his performance of the Variations on a favourite waltz had passed

unrecorded save in Marxsen's paper. Since that time he had given no

concert in Hamburg, and the change in his prospects is well measured by

the different circumstances of the occasions of 1849 and 1859. True that

at the age of twenty-six he had achieved no popular success, that his

concerto had effectually alienated from him the sympathies of the

Leipzigers, and that the Weimarites, whilst encouraging his efforts,

partially misunderstood his aims. Thorough-going belief in his art and

its promise was more firmly established than ever as a leading principle

of the inner Schumann circle, and this was itself gradually spreading.

We give the full programme of March 28, which is interesting for many

reasons:

1. Bach: Sonata for Clavier and Violin.

2. Handel: Aria from 'The Messiah.'

3. Tartini: 'Trillo del Diavolo.'

4. Schubert: Song, 'Der Erlkönig.'

5. Brahms: Serenade for Strings and Wind.

6. Boieldieu: Cavatina, 'Fete du Village Voisin.'

7. Schubert: Rondeau Brilliant for Pianoforte

and Violin.

8. Schubert, Schumann, etc.: Songs (including 'Der Nussbaum,'

'Mondnacht,' 'Widmung').

There was good reason to be delighted with the material result of the

undertaking. The large Wörmer hall was thronged. Brahms' artistic

success was also assured in regard to his playing of the duet sonata and

rondo with Joachim, and many of the musicians present appreciated his

wonderful accompaniment of Stockhausen's songs. The serenade, however,

now instrumented for small orchestra, and conducted by Joachim, was not

received with any decided favour, and the _Nachrichten_ expressed the

general sentiment of the time in the concluding sentence of its review:

'If Brahms will learn to say what is in his heart plainly and

straightforwardly, and not go out of his way to cut strange capers,

the public will endorse Schumann's hopes, and the laity be able to

understand what it is that professional musicians prize so highly

in his works.'

Such contemporary criticism might well pass unnoticed if it were not

that, in spite of the wealth of beautiful material and the fine

workmanship contained in the serenade, only one or two of its movements

are occasionally heard in the concert-rooms of the present day, whilst

the composer's later and more difficult orchestral works grow every year

in the favour of the public. The circumstance is to be chiefly explained

by considerations similar to those we have already applied to the first

concerto. When Brahms wrote the work he had not quite passed from his

apprenticeship. Though within sight of mastery, he had not achieved it.

The Serenade in D is a serenade in the character of its ideas, but not

entirely so in the structure of its movements. The instrumental

'serenata' (fair weather), a form which flourished vigorously during the

latter half of the eighteenth century, and was exhibited in its

greatest perfection by Mozart, was especially cultivated in an age when

music was dependent on the patron--the prince or nobleman who kept his

private band, and who delighted himself and his friends by open-air

performances in his park on fine summer nights. It consisted of a longer

or shorter series of movements--a march, an allegro, rondo, one or two

andantes, a couple of minuets, none of them developed to any great

length, and was composed for more or less solo instruments according to

circumstances. Brahms, fascinated by the performances of the Detmold

wind players, probably began his work with the intention of composing a

serenade _pur et simple_; but his interest in the art of thematic

development outran his discretion, and, by over-elaborating one of its

movements, he injured the balance of his composition and introduced into

it a character of complexity foreign to the nature of its form. The

Serenade in D consists of an allegro molto, scherzo, adagio non troppo,

minuets 1 and 2, scherzo, rondo. Some of the six movements, irresistible

from their grace, daintiness, or romance, delight the public when

performed as separate numbers, but the length of the opening movement

and the somewhat mechanical development of its middle section may

perhaps prove in the future, as they have done in the past, obstacles to

the frequent performance of the entire work. Traces of the young

musician's studies are to be found in the well-known reminiscences of

Beethoven and Haydn in the second scherzo.

The serenade, written as an octet and afterwards scored for small

orchestra, was probably rearranged for large orchestra, the form in

which it has become known to the world, in consequence of experience

obtained on this occasion of the first public performance of the work at

Hamburg.

The few years immediately succeeding Brahms' second return from Detmold

must be regarded as forming another turning-point in his career. They

witnessed the close of his _Sturm und Drang_ period and his complete

transformation into a master. They are remarkable not only on account of

the appearance of a number of short choral works which, perfect in

themselves, lead directly to the splendid achievements of later years in

the same domain, to the German Requiem, the Schicksalslied, the

Triumphlied, but they form a period of actual magnificent fruition. To

them is to be referred the inauguration of those chamber-music works of

Brahms which stand in the forefront of the finest compositions of their

kind, and the appearance of a classic for pianoforte unsurpassed by any

other of its form, the Variations and Fugue on a theme by Handel. This

portion of our composer's life belongs especially to his native city.

More than one consideration may have induced him, at the time, seriously

to contemplate the idea of settling permanently in Hamburg, and not the

least potent will have been furnished by his strong patriotic sentiment

and his deeply-rooted family affections. That he was not at once

accepted as a great composer by his fellow-citizens should not be matter

of surprise. It has too often been forgotten by Brahms' partisans that

his development as a creator was not precocious. The list of

Mendelssohn's compositions when he was a boy of sixteen is bewildering

in its length and variety; at the same age the most important of

Johannes' achievements was presumably the set of Variations on a

favourite waltz. Schubert's career was cut short in his thirty-second

year; Mozart died at thirty-five. Brahms at the age of twenty-six had

not completed any large work which can be regarded as entirely

representative of his mature powers, and had introduced but few

compositions either to the public or his friends. There were, however,

those among the musicians of Hamburg who, belonging to the increasing

circle of his personal acquaintances, believed in his creative genius

with the enthusiasm of absolute conviction, and as a pianist, though not

regarded as a phenomenal performer, he was generally accepted as an

artist of first rank.

Brahms' regard for his pupil, Fräulein Friedchen Wagner, had led to his

becoming intimate at her father's house, and here he frequently had

opportunity of hearing some of the compositions and arrangements for

voices which engaged much of his attention. Fräulein Friedchen, her

sister Thusnelda, and the charming Fräulein Bertha Porubszky, from

Vienna, who arrived in Hamburg to stay for a year with her aunt, Frau

Auguste Brandt, were delighted to practise short works in two and three

parts under his direction. Probably he hoped gradually to obtain a

larger number of recruits for his purpose. Before long, however,

accident led to his becoming the conductor of a quite considerable

ladies' choir.

On May 19 the wedding of Pastor Sengelmann and Fräulein Jenny von Ahsen

took place at St. Michael's Church. There was a large gathering of

friends to witness the ceremony. Grädener, already mentioned as a friend

of Brahms, who was an accomplished composer and the director of a

singing school, conducted his pupils in the performance of a motet for

female voices which he had written for the occasion, and Johannes, a

very old acquaintance of the bride, accompanied on the organ. Pleased

with the effect of Grädener's composition, Brahms expressed a wish to

hear his own 'Ave Maria' for female voices with accompaniment for organ,

composed during his second visit to Detmold, under similar conditions of

performance, and with the assistance of Fräulein Friedchen, who exerted

herself to procure the requisite number of voices, a rehearsal was

arranged. On Monday, June 6, twenty-eight ladies assembled at the

Wagners' house, and tried, not only the 'Ave Maria,' afterwards

published as Op. 12, but the 'O bone Jesu' and 'Adoramus,' now known as

Op. 37, Nos. 1 and 2. Brahms was seized with a fit of nervousness whilst

conducting, and Grädener, who was present amongst a few listeners,

stepped forward to the rescue; but a second rehearsal on the following

day went well, and the third trial in church with organ accompaniment

was in every respect highly successful. The practices had been so

enjoyable that, with the concurrence of Grädener, it was arranged that

the ladies, most of whom were pupils of the singing school, should

assemble every Monday morning to practise with Brahms; and the little

society thus founded became a source of delight to all who were

associated with it. The meetings were held during the first season at

the Wagners' house in the Pastorenstrasse; later on they took place at

several members' houses in turn. Each young lady used to sing from a

small oblong manuscript book, into which she copied her parts, and

several of these volumes are still in existence. After the business of

the morning was over, the conductor usually played to his young

disciples and admirers, who soon learned to look upon his performances

as not the least memorable part of the weekly programme. Writing in the

course of the summer to Fräulein von Meysenbug, Brahms says:

'... I am here, and shall probably remain until I go to Detmold.

Some very pleasant pupils detain me, and, strangely enough, a

ladies' society that sings under my direction; till now only what I

compose for it. The clear silver tones please me exceedingly, and

in the church with the organ the ladies' voices sound quite

charming.'[83]

The season closed on September 19 with a performance at St. Peter's

Church before an invited audience. Some of the 'Marienlieder'

(afterwards Op. 22) and the 13th Psalm (Op. 27) were included in the

programme. The members of the choir appeared attired in black to denote

their grief at the approaching departure of their conductor, and sent

him, afterwards, a silver inkstand buried beneath flowers as a mark of

their appreciation of his labours. This Brahms acknowledged from Detmold

in the following official letter to Fräulein Friedchen, his energetic

helper in the founding of the choir:

'DETMOLD, _end of Sept., 1859_.

'ESTEEMED FRÄULEIN,

'Nothing more agreeable than to be so pleasantly obliged to write a

letter as I am now.

'I think constantly of the glad surprise with which I perceived the

inkstand, the remembrance from the ladies' choir, under its

charming covering of flowers.

'I have done so little to deserve it that I should be ashamed were

it not that I hope to write much more for you; and I shall

certainly hear finer tones sounding around me as I look at the

valued and beautiful present on my writing-table. Pray express to

all whom you can reach my hearty greeting and thanks.

'I have seldom had a more agreeable pleasure, and our meetings will

remain one of my most welcome and favourite recollections.

'But not, I hope, till later years!

'With best greetings to you and yours,

'Your

'heartily sincere

'JOHS. BRAHMS.'[84]

That the composer did not forget his maidens during his season at

Detmold appears from another letter to Fräulein Wagner written a couple

of months later:

'_Dec., 1859._

'ESTEEMED FRÄULEIN,

'Here are some new songs for your little singing republic. I hope

they may assist in keeping it together. If I can help towards this

end pray command me.

'Kindest greetings to you and yours.

'Most sincerely,

'JOHS. BRAHMS.'[84]

Acquaintance with the charming circumstances which stimulated Brahms to

the writing of most of his published choruses for women's voices gives

an additional interest to the study of these beautiful compositions,

which undoubtedly take their place amongst the most fascinating works of

their class. Those with sacred texts, all evident fruits of the

composer's studies in the strict style of part-writing, show,

nevertheless, considerable variety of character. The 'Ave Maria,' with

accompaniment for orchestra or organ, Op. 12, first sung by, though not

composed for, the ladies' choir, is animated by a gentle, childlike,

devotional spirit appropriate to a prayer addressed by a group of tender

girls to the Virgin Mother of Christ. The 13th Psalm, with accompaniment

for organ or pianoforte, Op. 27, strikes at once a more solemn note,

with its three opening cries to the Lord; and the mourning plaint of the

writer is reproduced in tones whose fervent pleading is not impaired by

the clear simplicity of style in which the music is conceived. The Three

Sacred Choruses, without accompaniment, Op. 37, are alike beautiful,

whilst varying in character. The 'Adoramus' and 'Regina Coeli' (Nos. 2

and 3), written throughout in canon, are fine examples of learned

facility; and the last-named, the bright 'Regina Coeli,' for soprano and

alto soli and four-part women's chorus, is an entirely captivating

composition.

The secular pieces--the Songs with accompaniment for horns and harp, Op.

17, and the Songs and Romances to be sung _a capella_, Op. 44--though

fairly well known, should be heard oftener than they are. The dainty

charm of such little works as the 'Minnelied' and the 'Barcarole,' to

name only two of the most effective from Op. 44, gives welcome

refreshment in a miscellaneous choral concert, and never fails to

captivate an audience.

In our rapid survey of some of the works which are to be associated with

Brahms' Ladies' Choir, we have only taken account of those that were

actually published in the form required by the nature of the society.

Many settings and arrangements are to be found, in the little oblong

manuscript books, of songs which have become known to the world amongst

the composer's settings for a single voice or for mixed choir; and there

are some there which have never been published. The canons Nos. 1, 2, 8,

10, 11, 12 of Op. 113 were sung at the society's meetings. The 'Regina

Coeli,' on the other hand, was not included in the ladies'

répertoire.[85]

[76] Dr. Georg Fischer's 'Opera und Concerte im Hoftheater zu Hannover

bis 1866.'

[77] The concerto opens with a long-continued roll of drums.

[78] From a letter first published in Max Kalbeck's 'Johannes Brahms,'

vol. i., p. 356.

[79] 'Musikalisches und Literarisches': 'Neuer Brahms Katalog.'

[80] Moser's 'Life of Joachim.'

[81] Brahms' Trio in B major.

[82] First published in Reimann's 'Johannes Brahms.' One of the Princess

Friederike's Christmas presents to Brahms whilst he was her teacher

consisted of the five volumes (1851-1855 inclusive) of the Leipzig

Society's edition of Bach's works issued before he became a subscriber,

and it would appear from the opening of the above-quoted letter that she

made herself responsible for his subscription during the consecutive

seasons of his visits to Detmold. It is interesting to read the traces

of his movements furnished by the subscription list placed at the

commencement of each volume. In 1856 his name appears as belonging to

Düsseldorf; 1857-1864 inclusive, to Hamburg; and from 1865 onwards, to

Vienna.

[83] 'Aus Johannes Brahms' Jugendtagen,' by Hermann Freiherr von

Meysenbug (_Neues Wiener Tagblatt_, May, 1901).

[84] First published, with an account of the Ladies' Choir, in Hübbe's

'Brahms in Hamburg.'

[85] Hübbe.

The Life of Johannes Brahms (Vol 1 of 2) · 第 9 / 12 章