CHAPTER V

WAGNER AND THE MUSIC DRAMA

It is quite proper to devote a chapter to Richard Wagner, for his

later works are not only examples of the most skillful and purposeful

employment of the contrapuntal and instrumental resources which he, in

common with his contemporaries, inherited from the past, but they show

how audacious genius may safely pursue its purposes out beyond beaten

paths into unexplored regions of tonal expression.

Why may genius do this, which is so uniformly fatal to the less gifted?

It is because of its comprehensive grasp of logical sequence and its

intuitive choice of adaptable means.

Ripe genius is a definite talent which has been subjected to

exhaustive discipline, which is familiar with traditions, and takes

full cognizance of pedantic forms, but is guided by an art feeling

engendered by this knowledge, and not by the knowledge itself.

It is a law unto itself. It conceives a picture, a poem, or a musical

sentiment, and communicates it to us through means that are often as

unfamiliar as is the effect of the whole original; for it usually

avoids the ruts of travelled ways, its clear view of the objective goal

enabling it to follow the less frequented stream-side or mountain-top

paths.

Wagner was, in the last thirty years of his life, a ripe genius. He was

the sixth of our musical high-priests, and he filled the art temple

with a characteristic song incense which will pervade its atmosphere as

long as human passions continue to furnish art impulse.

There is a class of pedants who still take satisfaction in calling

Wagner's music artificial; but these short-sighted critics cannot or

will not properly survey the field of his activity and its fruits. No

human mind could, unless impelled by natural, sequential feeling and

virile imagination, write even one of his later dramas without manifold

exhibitions of weakness in redundancies and lapses in significance.

The fact that Wagner's works, from the "Meistersinger" on, show few,

if any, such barren moments, adequately evidences their natural growth

from musical germs.

A great creator always incites a large number of lesser lights to

imitate his methods, but few of them do so successfully. Wagner is not,

however, answerable for the vague effects of his dramatic means, when

they are transplanted into Wagnerish overtures and symphonic poems. He

evolved situations that made these means legitimate and significant;

isolated, they fall into bizarre artificiality. Although we cannot fail

to be influenced by the elements which Wagner added to tonal resources,

they, like all other elements, must be applied because most adaptable

to the development of the musical scheme in hand, and not because of

their newness.

"A prophet is not without honor save in his own country." This was

strikingly exemplified by the attitude of professional Leipzig towards

Wagner during the earlier stages of his career. Leipzig was at that

time regarded by the outlying world as the musical centre of the

universe, a Mecca with a magic balm, dispensed by a priesthood whose

Mahomet was Mendelssohn.

The town had been a prominent seat of learning since the first part

of the fifteenth century, had possessed Bach as cantor of its

"St. Thomas' school," had for a long series of years maintained

its "Gewandhaus" concerts, and was the greatest of all book- and

music-selling marts.

These circumstances combined to make Leipzig stand out in bold relief

on the world's map, but it required Mendelssohn's magnetism to make its

attractions irresistible.

The Conservatory faculty of those days included all the most prominent

musicians domiciled in Leipzig, for the town was too small to furnish

adherents for such contra-minded parties or factions as exist in

larger cities. Mendelssohn had enlisted his forces with well-directed

regard for harmony, but their creed, although properly placing Bach

as the corner-stone of musical faith, was too narrow in its tenets

to admit those to communion whose fancy led them outside the pale of

traditional forms. They were even lukewarm towards Schumann, who

had lived among them, had created a period,[A] and had contributed

treasures to musical literature so luminous with genius that, as

the mists of prejudice clear away, they will eclipse forever all

contemporaneous productions in the various forms which they followed.

The rugged boldness of originality was in the esteem of the Leipzig

pedagogue but an exhibition of crude ignorance. Those who could not or

would not recognize Schumann's great throbbing heart in his writings,

because he, in expressing his individuality, did not always follow

prescribed formulæ, would naturally have rejected Wagner, for his

earlier works were not cast in classic moulds.

[A] Composers who originate forms or methods that recommend themselves

to the musical world because they voice recognizable advance in art

expression, create periods. Mendelssohn was in his more earnest moods a

modernized Bach. He did not originate forms, but adapted those of his

great ideal to our nineteenth century habits of thought and feeling. He

did this inimitably, but he was more finished than forceful or bold,

and his impress on art was consequently not deep, although extremely

salutary.

Those of Wagner's creations which had been before the public previous

to 1860 were characterized by few departures from Weber and Meyerbeer

in scheme. Wagnerian harmonies were, however, too strong for the

Leipzig critic, but the public flocked to hear them, and was pleased.

Original ideas often find first recognition among the non-professional,

because musical leaders are so saturated with pedantry that sparks of

genius cannot quickly kindle them to enthusiasm.

In 1862 the Gewandhaus directors made a great concession; they invited

Richard Wagner to conduct his "Tannhäuser Overture" at one of their

concerts. This was a fatal mistake, for his triumph was complete,

and their influence as opponents of the "music of the future" was

correspondingly weakened. I have discussed Leipzig at such length,

not because it was Wagner's birthplace, but because from this town,

with all its intolerance and smallness, started the only short road to

success. Leipzig's endorsement was a universally accepted voucher.

Wagner had found this direct path barred, and his wanderings in

surmounting or circumventing obstacles lasted for a long series of

years, but his faith remained steadfast, and he reached the goal of

his ambition a far stronger man because of the difficulties he had

overcome. His appearance at the Gewandhaus was only a station on his

course to already assured success, and not his starting-point.

Wagner found opera a succession of solo, ensemble, and chorus pieces,

strung upon plots often too slender to give them coherence.

Texts had been made subservient to music, and that, in turn, to the

singer's convenience and ambition for display. Operas were written as

early as the thirteenth century, but Cherubini was the first Italian,

and Gluck the first German, to produce works that have survived.

Cherubini was followed by Rossini, a man of genius, but too indolent

to fully develop his gifts. Had his beautiful sensuous melodies been

put into richer settings, had more earnest thought been added to his

spontaneity, his operas would have taken their places among the undying

creations.

Flashes of genius ultimately tire. It is the steady light of genius,

fed by knowledge and earnestness (as in Beethoven, Schubert, and

Schumann), that can hold the world's attention restfully, which means

perpetually.

Bellini, with "Norma" and "Sonnambula," and Donizetti, with "Lucia di

Lammermoor" and "Lucretia Borgia," still hold a place on the operatic

stage, but their grasp is weakening. Verdi was the best equipped of all

Italian opera composers, and his "Trovatore," with it rare gems, will

crown his memory to the end of musical time. His later works, "Aida,"

"Othello," and "Falstaff," written under the influence of the Wagner

period, are quite different from his earlier operas in instrumentation

and in treatment of themes. In them he is more logical and stronger,

but less sensuous. They furnish the first instances of Italian music

dressed in foreign garb; of Italian music written under pressure from

without. It has until recently been Italy's province to shed influence

over the musical world. I construe Verdi's concessions to Wagner as

the strongest possible endorsement of the latter's ideas. No other

composer was in position to pay such tribute to Wagner's forceful and

far-reaching art sense.

The Italian composers of the new school are musical brigands, who for a

brief space succeeded in taking tribute from the musical world. Their

leader, Mascagni, made such a sensational raid with his "Cavalleria

Rusticana" that young Italy jumped into the breach he made, and

evidently thought to take possession of our temple, regardless of their

lack of equipment and discipline. Although but few years have elapsed

since this assault on art, its episodes have already been relegated to

the realm of disturbing memories.

"Cavalleria Rusticana," the first and best of its class, has some

merits; it is short, melodious, and dramatic, but its melodies are

often sentimental, and its dramatic points are usually made through the

audacious employment of crude means. The direct influence of this work

and its reception, conspired for harm to art.

Gluck was a Teuton, and although educated in Italy and adopted by

France, can with propriety be called the father of German opera.

His "Iphigenia in Tauris" and "Orpheus and Eurydice" will always

be regarded as classic models of lyric writing. Gluck's schemes

differed little from those of the Italian school, but his harmonic and

instrumental methods were German.

Mozart was a phenomenal combination of inconsistencies. His routine and

creative genius were of the highest order, his spontaneity and finish

make his music delightful alike to amateurs and musicians, but he

seldom seems to take matters seriously. "Don Juan," the "Requiem," and

his string quartets are exceptions, for in these he is earnest and does

his genius full justice.

Beethoven gave us "Fidelio." He was equally endowed with Mozart, but

was actuated in what he did by earnest, deep feeling. "Fidelio,"

although built on the old and now discarded lines, will only take

second place (musically) when some genius arises capable of writing

symphonies to supersede Beethoven's nine. In "Fidelio" we still have

the string of well-defined pieces, but they are rich in harmonization

and polyphony.

Weber made a great impression on opera. His audacious use of the

orchestra and of modulation, opened up new fields of possibility, and

there is a doubt as to whether modern German opera would have become

what it is, had Weber not lived. He was gifted with an inexhaustible

store of melody, was equal to all dramatic situations, however

exacting, and could court popular favor without belittling his art,--a

very rare quality. Weber was at first Wagner's model, and "Rienzi" and

"Der Fliegende Holländer" bear a distinct Weber impress.

Meyerbeer was a German, but early adopted Italian methods. He was an

excellent business man, possessed ample means, and therefore secured

deserved recognition early in his career, instead of having lived

almost a life of deferred hopes, as is usually the good musician's

lot. Meyerbeer is melodious, and is often dramatic, but unlike Weber,

sometimes belittles his art in catering to public tastes. His pageant

and ballet music are the most characteristic and impressive features of

his operas.

Wagner expressed contempt for Meyerbeer, but evidently recognized the

grandeur of the operatic pageantry of which he was the creator. We see

evidences of this phase of Meyerbeer's influence until we pass the

"Lohengrin" stage.

Many other good operas were produced during the first half of this

century, but as they were not potential factors in operatic evolution,

I shall mention them only in passing.

Adam wrote "Postillion;" Auber, "Fra Diavolo," "Die Stumme von

Portici," etc.; Flotow, "Martha" and "Alessandro Stradella;"

Hérold, "Zampa;" Kreutzer, "Nachtlager von Granada;" Lortzing, "Der

Waffenschmied," "Der Czar und Zimmermann," etc; Marschner, "Hans

Heiling," "Der Templer und die Jüdin," and "Der Vampyre;" Nicolai, "The

Merry Wives;" Spohr, "Jessonda" and "Faust," and Schumann, "Genoveva."

All of these operas are still given at least occasionally, and most of

them are excellent musical compositions.

The situation at the time when Wagner first manifested a defined

tendency towards the music drama was as follows: Gluck had given the

world his two great works, and they, together with "Fidelio," "Don

Juan," "The Magic Flute," "The Marriage of Figaro," "Der Freischutz,"

and "Oberon" of the German, and "Trovatore," "William Tell," "Norma,"

"Lucia di Lammermoor," "La Sonnambula," "Robert le Diable," "Der

Prophet," and "Die Hugenotten" of the Italian, were the most prominent

and best examples of operatic writing.

Although the first steps towards the emancipation of opera from

inconsistencies were the result of conditions rather than of

premeditation, Wagner had sufficient genius to appreciate the power

inherent in logical sequence: a power which, when compared with that

resulting from eccentric modes, is as the progress of the ages to

that of a leaf borne by the wind. Logical sequence moves onward with

irresistible momentum, whereas fragmentary diction is blown about by

every wind of caprice.

The condition which most influenced Wagner's conceptions was his

relation as poet to his musical undertakings. He was in each instance

first poet and then composer, and nothing could have been more natural

than his early evinced disposition to guard his texts from distorted,

disconnected renderings. This disposition grew, as through experience

his grasp became more and more comprehensive. There were no backward

steps in his career. It was like his schemes,--consequent,--advancing

unwaveringly from inception to full realization in "Parsifal" and

"Tristan und Isolde."

Wagner had courage adequate to sustain him in following his

conceptions through ridicule, want, and almost utter friendlessness.

No discouragement could divert him from the even tenor of his chosen

course. His early operas, although their texts were treated with

unwonted respect, gave little intimation of the revolution which was

to be accomplished by their author, and it is extremely doubtful

whether Wagner at this period had a shadowy conception even of that

later ideal, which time and experience developed, in which music and

the pictorial element were not only to collaborate with, but were to

reproduce the situations and sentiments of his poems.

This kind of tone painting, in which the composer endeavors to endow

his musical phrases with definite significance, is justifiable and

effective when they are so closely associated in performance with the

motive text as to derive directness from its more tangible character.

Such efforts must not be classed with so-called program music.

"Der Fliegende Holländer", "Rienzi," and "Tannhäuser" might have

been produced through the co-operation of Weber and Meyerbeer, with

Wagner's individuality as a flavor. In them the voices are given

melodies in clear-cut form, and they contain pompous Meyerbeerisms

almost approaching the bizarre. This Wagner flavor, which consisted

largely of a disregard of harmonic laws and key relationships, as

dictated by the pedantic school, caught the public, but it aroused the

violent opposition of older musicians. They denounced Wagner as a crazy

ignoramus and his operas as abominations.

Viewed from a theoretical stand-point, there was that in Wagner's

earlier works which in a measure justified his critics. He was not a

good contrapuntist, and he consequently violated tenets of musical

structure when conformity would have been more adequate.

The relations borne by plastic musical diction to the elementary rules

of tonal science are so little understood, and a clear understanding of

these relations is so important, that I feel justified in reiterating

in different form what was said in a former chapter,--viz., that

musical theory as a whole is but the codification of nature's

adjustments. Extraordinary requirements license exceptional means and

modes, but when composers abandon the letter of musical tenets and

substitute therefor the higher law of compensation, they enter upon

a field in which pitfalls abound, and through which nothing but keen

judgment, founded upon experienced erudition, can safely guide them.

This law of compensation allows us to disregard elementary laws, when

the nature of the situation in hand is such as to warrant and reconcile

our musical sense to combinations or successions, which would without

this justification sound crude and faulty. The habit of what is called

free writing is most pernicious, for compensation must legitimize each

irregularity or we lapse into incoherency.

Wagner was a firm, but an equally thoughtful man, and while apparently

undisturbed by the cyclone of criticism evoked by his compositions,

saw his vulnerable points, and at once set about fortifying them.

He studied counterpoint exhaustively, taking Bach as his model, and

memorizing many of that master's most characteristic works. He then

gave the world "Die Meistersinger" as the fruit of his labor, and

therewith forever silenced honest cavillers who had based their adverse

criticisms on his ignorance, for that work is a sublime example of

contrapuntal virtuosity, and it marks the beginning of a new era in

Wagner's development as a musician. His orchestral settings having

kept pace with his musical growth, had ripened, had become tempered,

consequently "Die Meistersinger" is one of the most beautiful

compositions of any time, and in it we have the clear announcement of

the new dispensation.

There have been tons of literature printed, having as subjects "The

Music of the Future," "Wagner," and "The Music-drama," some of the

authors of which have been properly equipped (good musicians and

liberally educated men), but more have been literary scavengers. The

former class, having been on a war footing ever since Wagner became

a bone of contention, are only just now beginning to discuss his

creations dispassionately. Most of them were quite naturally arrayed

against Wagner, for the most pungent flavor of the educated critic's

writing is pedantry. He prefers traditions without originality to

originality which does nor conform to traditions.

Wagner's first works almost paralyzed these gentlemen, and they were

a long time forgetting and forgiving the shock. Their criticisms were

terribly acrid, but, as I have before mentioned, were instrumental in

creating the music-drama, inasmuch as through pointing out veritable

faults and weaknesses they led Wagner to broaden his scholarship. These

critics find it hard to lay down their arms, although the battle is

over, and Wagner died in full possession of the field. The few who were

from the outset in sympathy with Wagner were quite as intemperate in

their laudations as were his opponents in their strictures. They were

blind idolaters, and Wagner was their musical "golden calf."

The essence of the creed upon which the new dispensation is based

is logical consistency. Poetry, music, and "stage business" are by

it required to co-operate in expressing sentiments and in carrying

the threads of dramatic schemes. Each of these arts is entirely

essential to Wagner's creations. His texts are statues, which music,

stage-setting, and action imbue with life. For this reason no one can

hope to follow Wagner intelligently who starts without having made

himself conversant with his poems. His later texts are heroic epics

of no mean order. Their adaptability and musical suggestiveness are

phenomenal. They could have been produced only by a musician-poet who

had his completed pictures in view while writing them.

They contain a vast amount of a species of word-painting,--viz., the

use of words the very sounds of which are expressive. I remember well

the hilarity caused among the anti-Wagnerites by the "Nibelungen" text,

which was published some years before the operas were performed.

Satires and parodies were written; Wagner was described wooing his muse

arrayed in fanciful vestments suiting the character of the subject

under treatment. That was a happy time for his opponents. Opera texts

that were not sentimental lyrics were incomprehensible. The "Call of

the Walküre" was to them the climax of inanity; but those who have

heard its musical setting will readily understand how its performance

hushed these scoffers into respectful silence. I mention this "call"

because most musical persons have heard it, and wondered at its

adaptability.

Wagner bestowed the utmost care upon each and every task which

he undertook; his effects are, therefore, less accidental than

those of any other composer. He was in the habit of making three

manuscripts,--viz., a sketch in which the outlines of form and

character were defined, then a score in which contrapuntal and

instrumental material were developed, and, lastly, a manuscript in

which, after ample weighing and filing, each detail of dynamic marking,

etc., was not approximately but precisely indicated. A Wagnerian

crescendo or decrescendo must begin and end with the notes and dynamic

force prescribed by the master, or we miss the full realization of

his pictures. In securing instrumental color he was liable to mark

the various parts played together differently, ranging from forte

to pianissimo, according to the combination and registers of the

instruments employed.

Wagner left little or nothing to the conductor's discretion.

Nevertheless, there are few who have the keen, delicate perception

requisite to understanding his aims, and still fewer who have it in

their power to so control their forces as to secure their fulfilment.

We will now look at some of Wagner's methods of musical treatment.

In the first place, we find the Overture replaced by the Vorspiel

(prelude or introduction). The former, in its independent completeness,

complying more or less with the exactions of the sonate form, was

quite in place when operas consisted of detached pieces; whereas

the "Vorspiel," which is analogous to the dramatic prologue, is

better adapted to the newer form. It is composed of, or at least it

introduces, the pivotal themes of the drama which it precedes. In the

prelude to "Parsifal," which begins with the _communion_ theme, Wagner

has accorded to it, and to the _grail_ and _faith_ motives, places of

honor. They are, indeed, the foundation upon which the whole drama

rests, and are the keys to its situations. We find the traditional

closing form (Coda) conspicuous by absence, the prelude leading up to

and closing in the opening tones of the first act. This omission is

grateful, for all careful musical listeners must have been disturbed

time and again by the long-drawn, fanfare effects that custom has

placed at the end of musical pieces. They are relics of barbarism to

which even Beethoven's genius could not impart logical significance.

The composer who, having finished the development of his themes, having

said what he had to say, appends a closing form composed of either new

material or of old inconsequently presented, sacrifices symmetry and

vital force.

If custom required poets to attach Hallelujah-Hosanna verses to their

finished poems, the result would not be intrinsically more incongruous

than that produced by the average musical coda. A piece of music should

end roundly, with a peroration, but this peroration must be adapted

to the character and length of that which has preceded it, must grow

out of the themes from which the piece has been developed, and form an

integral part of the whole. The oft-mentioned intangibility of our art

seems to induce timidity among her devotees, and unfortunately this

timidity is often greatest among those who are best fitted to introduce

innovations.

We will next consider the vocal treatments of Wagner's texts. Following

his course from the beginning, we find the singer's parts grow less

and less melodic, but the listener, if not the singer, has more than

adequate compensation for this loss of lyric quality in the dramatic

power gained. Reverting to our simile of the statue, the stage setting

and orchestra provide an atmosphere, and the singer breathes into the

text the breath which launches it into life.

In his later dramas Wagner makes the vocal parts purely musical

declamation. He endeavors to, and usually succeeds in intensifying

the elocutionary effects through changes of pitch and expressive

rhythm, but gives the singer's convenience and voice limitations

little attention. The singer's parts are, therefore, very difficult to

learn and exhausting to sing, and they afford so little opportunity

for display that only a love of art, strongly flavored with

self-abnegation, could induce singers to attempt them.

My study of Wagner's works has greatly increased my respect for

the intellects of Wagnerian singers. Any man or woman who can sing

a leading part in one of the music-dramas acceptably, must have

been endowed with strong throat and lungs, and must have acquired a

faultless vocal method.

It is almost needless to say that the texts are set without any of

those old-time illogical repetitions in which composers indulged, in

order that happy thoughts--good musical episodes--might be amplified.

Wagner never lost sight of his central idea, and made everything bend

to its fullest realization.

His orchestra does not accompany, in the common acceptation of that

term, but sings into its many-voiced melody the sentiments and moods

suggested by the text. The principal means used in the attainment of

this end is the "Leit Motif." Its auxiliaries are the countless shades

of harmonic and instrumental color which Wagner commanded.

These "Leit Motifs" (leading and characteristic themes) constituted

Wagner's vocabulary. They expressed to him personalities, moods, or

sentiments, as the case required, and they were consequently chosen

to impersonate these in his schemes. They sometimes consist of a

few tones, and again of phrases. They appear in varied forms to suit

changing conditions, but their impersonations are only made clearer

through their elastic adaptability. These themes seldom appear in

the vocal parts, but Wagner makes them, through adaptation and

instrumentation, express each shade, from sunlight to storm, from love,

trust, and worship, to wrath, fear, and hate, and in this way follows

his text on parallel lines,--music by the side of and reinforcing

poetry.

Wagner's demands on the stage-carpenter and scene-painter are so great

that none but large theatres with ample means can properly realize his

ideas of pictorial illustration. He possessed remarkable talent for

inventing scenic effects, and disregarded cost.

Wagner originated the idea of having the stage overshoot the space

allotted to the orchestra, the effect of which has been good in

most instances where applied. It has two advantages over the common

placing,--viz., it brings the singer nearer his audience, which

facilitates his task of making himself understood, and it has a

grateful tendency to suppress obstreperous brass, who have a way, when

placed in front of the stage, of making singers forgotten. I have seen

singers struggle with tense muscles and swelling veins to make a vocal

climax with no other result than an heroic spectacle.

When a conductor allows his brass to bury the more modest elements

of his orchestra under their clangor, he shows incapacity,--either a

lack of control or a coarse conception of their mission,--and as this

incapacity is quite common, any mechanical device which will insure

moderation on the part of our assertive friends who play the trumpets

and trombones is worthy of commendation.

Now let us see what can be done towards putting ourselves still more

closely in sympathy with the master, and to better prepare ourselves to

follow his creations intelligently. Following intelligently does not

imply merely the recognition of episodes of especial significance or

beauty, but much more: it implies the loss of no contributive detail

and an easy grasp of the combined means.

Exhaustive study alone can make this possible. Its importance must

serve to excuse my reverting to the subject of texts. One should

never take a book into an opera-house, but should make it superfluous

through earnest and repeated readings at home. We should at least so

familiarize ourselves with the text of works worthy of hearing, that

we can anticipate situations and keep in touch with each and every

detail of action and shade of meaning. This having been accomplished,

and having made ourselves acquainted with the more important Leit

Motifs, we shall be intellectually equipped to follow the master in the

development of his music-drama on the lines and through the methods we

have considered.

I do not wish to claim that the most favorable conditions would enable

us to fully understand intentions, or to discover all points of beauty

and strength in one hearing; our study should, however, have placed

us quite inside the cold curiosity line. We would be entitled to a

creative sense akin to that felt by a co-worker: our natures would have

been made acoustically receptive and responsive.

Music and Its Masters · 第 5 / 7 章