Thus did the suns rise and set in glory across the level lan

[Illustration: CHAMBERS'S JOURNAL

OF

POPULAR

LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART.

Fourth Series

CONDUCTED BY WILLIAM AND ROBERT CHAMBERS.

NO. 714. SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1877. PRICE 1½_d._]

TREATMENT OF ANIMALS.

In our youthful days in the early years of the present century, little

consideration was given to a systematic kindness to animals. Horses

were overwrought without mercy, when ill-fed and with wounds which

should have excited compassion. If they sunk down in their misery,

they were left to die, the chances being that, in their last hours,

they were inhumanly pelted with stones by boys;--no one, not even

magistrates or clergymen, giving any concern to the cruelties that

were perpetrated. All that we have seen, without exciting a word of

remonstrance. A wretch who habitually turned out his old, overwrought,

and half-starved horses to die on the town-green, never incurred

any check or reprobation. His proceedings were viewed with perfect

indifference. People, while passing along in a demure sort of way to

church, would see a crowd of boys pitching stones into the wounds of a

dying horse, and not one of these decorous church-goers endeavoured to

stop these horrid acts of inhumanity. Like the Pharisees of old, they

passed on the other side. Such within recollection is a small sample of

the unchecked atrocities of our young days. Cats were pelted to death.

Birds' nests were robbed. Dogs had kettles tied to their tail, and were

hounded to madness by howling multitudes. Oxen were overdriven to an

infuriated condition, and their frantic and revengeful career formed an

acceptable subject of public amusement.

Barbarous in a certain sense as these comparatively recent times were,

there had already been shewn instances of a kind consideration for

animals. The poet Cowper, it will be recollected, wrote touchingly of

the hares which he had domesticated. Sir Walter Scott's tender regard

for his dogs has been recently noticed in these pages. There was here

and there a glimmering consciousness that animals had some sort of

claims on the mercy of mankind. What strikes one as curious is that

society had retrograded in this respect. The oldest laws in the world,

found in the early books of the Old Testament, enjoin a kind treatment

of animals. If we see an ass fall which belongs to some one with whom

we have a cause of difference, we are to throw aside private feelings,

and hasten to help the animal. We are not to take a bird when sitting

on its eggs, or on its young; a most humane injunction. In various

texts the Hebrews were enjoined to have due regard for the comfort of

the ox, the ass, or any other animal which laboured for them. In these

venerable records, mercy is enjoined towards all living creatures.

The modern world, with all its pompous claims to civilisation,

strangely drifted into an entire neglect of these beneficent

obligations. Throughout Christendom, any laws enforcing a kind

treatment of animals are few in number, and of very recent date. Even

within our remembrance, clergymen were not usually in the habit of

inculcating that species of kindness to domesticated creatures which

we read of in the Old Testament; nor were children ordinarily taught

lessons of humanity within the family circle. The oldest statutory laws

concerning animals are those for the protection of game; but these

laws proceeded on no principle of kindness. They were intended only

to protect certain birds and quadrupeds during the breeding season,

with a view to what is called 'sport,' the pleasure of killing them

by licensed individuals--the license for indulging in this species of

luxury being, as is well known, pretty costly. It is not our wish to

hold up 'sport' of a legitimate kind to ridicule. The chief matter of

regret is the coarse way in which game is sometimes pursued and killed

even by licensed sportsmen: their operations in what is known as a

_battue_, when vast numbers of animals are driven into narrow spaces,

and shot down and maimed without mercy, being, as we think, no better

than wholesale butchery; and not what might be expected from persons of

taste and education.

Although in the early years of the present century there were no laws

for the specific purpose of preventing cruelty to animals, thoughtful

and humane persons were beginning to give attention to the subject. In

1809, Sir Charles Bunbury brought into the House of Commons a bill

for the 'Prevention of wanton and malicious cruelty to Animals.' Mr

Windham, a cabinet minister, little to his credit, opposed the bill,

and it failed to pass. The next attempt at legislation on the subject

was made by Lord Erskine in the House of Lords in 1810. His measure was

opposed by Lord Ellenborough, and had to be withdrawn. There the matter

rested until 1821, when Mr Richard Martin, member of parliament for

Galway, brought a bill into the House of Commons for the 'Prevention

of Cruelty to Horses.' It encountered torrents of ridicule, and after

passing a second reading in a thin house, was no further proceeded

with. Mr Martin, however, was not discouraged. He felt he was right,

and returned to the encounter. In 1822, he introduced a new and more

comprehensive bill. Instead of horses, he used the word 'cattle;' this

bill passed through all its stages, and became an act of parliament.

This act of 1822 was the first ever enacted against cruel and improper

treatment of animals. Let there be every honour to the memory of

Richard Martin for his noble struggle on behalf of defenceless

creatures. In 1825, he brought in a bill for the suppression of

bear-baiting and other cruel sports. Not without surprise do we learn

that Sir Robert Peel met the bill with determined opposition, and that

it was thrown out. To think that so eminent a statesman as Peel should

have been a supporter of bear-baiting! No fact could better present an

idea of what was still the backward state of feeling among educated

persons on the subject of cruelty to animals.

The year 1826 found Mr Martin still at his post. He framed a bill

to extend protection to dogs, cats, and other domesticated animals

from cruelty. In this it might have been expected he would have been

successful. But no. His arguments to move the House of Commons were

unavailing. Mr Martin died in 1834. Not until 1835, when more enlarged

ideas prevailed, was there an Act to throw a protecting shield over

cattle in the market, on the way to the slaughter-house, and in the

roads and streets generally; over all such animals as dogs, bulls,

bears, or cocks, kept for purposes of baiting or fighting; over all

animals kept in pounds or inclosures without a sufficiency of food or

drink; and over all worn-out horses, compelled to work when broken down

with weakness or disease.

It was reserved for the beneficent reign of the present Queen to see

a comprehensive Act of Parliament for the prevention of cruelty to

animals. This was the Act of 1849 (which was extended to Scotland in

1850), that now forms the basis for prosecuting cases of cruelty, and

may be called the charter which conferred on domesticated animals

a right to protection. Lamenting the backwardness of England in

establishing such a charter, it is not without pride that one knows

that England was after all the first country in modern times to enforce

the principle that the lower animals are entitled to be protected by

law. That principle, as we have shewn, is not new. It was recognised

by the ancient Hebrews, and it is pleasing to feel that at length

modern common-sense has legislatively assumed its propriety. Latterly,

there have been several additional Acts of Parliament, chiefly as

concerns protection to sea-birds and small land-birds; but while well

meant, these Acts are very imperfect. The eggs of sea-birds not being

protected, the nests of these animals may be rifled with impunity. As

regards small birds, a number are left out in the list of protected

animals--the skylark for one. These deficiencies are unfortunate.

Sea-birds, though generally looked on with indifference, are of great

public utility. They benefit agriculturists by eating the worms and

grubs in newly ploughed land; they hover over parts of the sea and

point out where there are shoals of herrings and other fish; they are

useful to the mariner in foggy weather, by their warning cries near

the rock-bound coast. How beautiful that arrangement of Nature, in

making provision for birds to live on shelving rocks by the sea-shore,

there to act like beacons, in warning off the bark of the mariner from

a coast that would cause its destruction! Considering that wonderful

provision, how scandalous, how short-sighted the practice of rifling

the nests of sea-birds! A supplementary Act to protect the eggs of

sea-birds cannot, as a matter of public duty, be too soon passed.

Already, on some parts of the coast, sea-birds are said to be rapidly

disappearing.

As every one knows, dogs are often lost in large towns, and roam about

miserably in search of their master or mistress. A sight of them in

such circumstances is exceedingly pitiable. In the Metropolis, a

humane plan for succouring lost dogs has been established. Some years

ago, a benevolent lady, Mrs Tealby, was enabled, by the aid of public

subscriptions, to set on foot a temporary Home for Lost and Starving

Dogs, which has existed since 1860. It is situated at Battersea Park

Road. Any dog, when found and brought to the Home, is taken in and

succoured under certain necessary conditions. If a dog, after being

housed and succoured, is applied for by the owner (with satisfactory

proof of ownership), the animal is given up on payment of the expenses

of its keep. If no owner comes forward, every unclaimed dog is sold for

the benefit of the institution, or otherwise disposed of according to

circumstances. The Home is growing in usefulness. In one year recently

more than three thousand three hundred dogs were restored to their

former owners or sent to new homes. Many owners who recover their

favourites through the agency of this institution, not only refund the

expenses incurred, but assist the funds by subscriptions in the name of

their recovered pets--as for instance, 'In memory of Pup,' 'For little

Fido,' 'In name of darling Charlie,' 'The mite from an old dog;' and so

on. This deserving and well managed institution is well worth visiting.

Only, the visitor must be prepared to see painful demonstrations from

some of the unhappy inmates. On the approach of the visitor, each

animal eagerly hastens to see if he be his dear master. And when a

sniff and a glance render too evident the fact that you are not the

person wished for, something like a tear steals from the poor doggie's

eye. The happiness shewn when one of the animals finds his lost master

is equally expressive. Looking to the great good done in the cause

of humanity by this meritorious Home for Lost and Starving Dogs, it

may be hoped that efforts will not be wanting to establish similar

institutions elsewhere.

There is another admirable establishment worth referring to. It is

known as the Brown Institution, from having been founded by the bequest

in 1851 of a large sum of money by Mr Thomas Brown. Its design was the

advancement of knowledge concerning the diseases of animals, the best

mode of treating them for the purpose of cure, and the encouragement

of humane conduct towards animals generally. The Institution combines

the quality of an infirmary and a dispensary for animals belonging to

persons who are not well able to pay for ordinary medical attendance,

and therefore does not trench on veterinary establishments. Several

thousands of animals are treated annually. The Institution, which is

under the direction of the Senate of the University of London, is

situated in Wandsworth Road, near Vauxhall Railway Station. As an

hospital and dispensary for poor horses, dogs, and other animals, the

Brown Institution is unique of its kind. As far as we know, there is

nothing like it in the world. What a prodigious step in advance is the

Home for Dogs, and the Institution now described, from the condition of

things at the beginning of the nineteenth century!

In speaking of the improved treatment of defenceless creatures within

recent times, a prominent place is due to the Royal Society for the

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, located in Jermyn Street, London.

Standing at the head of all organisations of the kind in the United

Kingdom, this Society may be considered the watchful guardian of the

rights of animals, and without whose agency the laws we have enumerated

would, as regards England, stand a poor chance of being enforced. The

business of this Society is conducted mainly by the employment of

persons all over the country to find out cases of cruelty, and to bring

the offenders to justice. The Society diffuses hand-bills and placards

in places where they may come prominently under the notice of persons

likely to infringe the law. It further has issued various publications

calculated to stir up the feelings in behalf of animals.

The hand-bills and placards deserve special notice. Sheep salesmen

are reminded that convictions have been obtained against persons for

ill-treating sheep by cutting and lacerating their ears, as a means of

identifying them from sheep belonging to other consigners. Shepherds

are warned, by a cited example, to abstain from a specified mode

of treating sheep for certain maladies; because pain is inflicted,

which a veterinary surgeon knows how to avoid, but which an ignorant

though well-meaning shepherd may not. Farmers are reminded that it

is a punishable offence to crowd too many sheep together on going

to market; instances being cited in which eleven sheep were crammed

into a small cart, with their legs tied tightly together. Captains of

freight steamers are informed that penalties have been enforced against

a captain for so overcrowding his vessel, on a voyage from Holland to

the Thames, as to cause the sheep much pain and suffering; carriers and

cattle-barge owners are under the same legal obligations.

In regard to cows, one placard cautions persons sending them to market

with the udder greatly distended with milk, and from which the poor

animals evidently suffer much pain. Cattle rearers are told that

penalties have been enforced against one of their body for sawing off

the horns of fourteen heifers so close to the head as to cause blood to

flow in considerable quantity, and to make the animals stamp and moan;

the object of such a mode of cutting being to increase the market value

of the horns. Butchers are reminded that it is a punishable offence

to bleed calves to death merely for the sake of giving additional

whiteness to veal. Consigners and carriers are alike reminded that

the Act of 1849 imposes fines or imprisonment as a punishment for

conveying animals in such way as to subject them to unnecessary pain or

suffering; the neglect to give proper food and water to the animals,

whether coming to market, at market, or in removal from market, is

announced in another hand-bill to be an infringement of the same

statute.

Drovers, by another hand-bill or placard, are cautioned against urging

on cattle which by lameness are unfitted to travel along the roads and

streets; and against striking animals on the legs so violently as to

lame them: both are practices to which drovers are too prone, and both

are punishable. Farmers, graziers, and salesmen are alike warned that

the season of the year should be taken into account in the transport

of shorn sheep. 'It is hardly conceivable that respectable farmers and

graziers, merely for the sake of profit, can in the months of December,

January, February, March, or April, cruelly strip a dumb animal of

that warm woollen coat which the goodness of God has provided more

abundantly in winter to protect it from the cold weather; or that any

English salesman will lay himself open to a criminal charge of aiding

or continuing the offence by exposing shorn animals for sale at such

inclement seasons.'

Horses and donkeys find a place in the safeguards which the Society

endeavours to provide, by disseminating placards and hand-bills

pointing out the penalties for cruelty or neglect. It is an offence

against the laws to work a horse in an omnibus, cab, or other vehicle

when in an infirm or worn-out state. It is an offence to beat a horse

in a stable with a degree of severity amounting to cruelty, merely to

make it obedient, or still worse, through an impulse of angry passion.

It is an offence to set a horse to drag a cart or wagon loaded with a

weight beyond his strength; many coal-merchants and their carmen have

been prosecuted and fined for this unfeeling conduct. It is an offence

to cruelly beat and over-ride poor donkeys; useful animals which seem

fated to be the victims of very hard treatment in the world. It is a

significant fact that one placard is addressed to 'excursionists and

others:' those who have witnessed the treatment of donkeys by their

drivers, at Hampstead Heath, Blackheath, and the humbler grades of

sea-side places where holiday people assemble, will know what this

means. The Society aid the inspectors of mines, or are aided by them,

in bringing to justice truck-drivers and others for working horses and

ponies in an unfit state in coal-pits.

It was not likely that dogs would be left out of sight by the

Society; the maltreating of such animals is the subject of some

of the cautionary placards, especially in localities where rough

persons, prone to dog-tormenting, are known to be numerous. Cats are

the subjects concerning which other warnings are given, in regard to

torturing or cruelly worrying. Fishmongers are reminded that it is

a punishable offence which many persons commit of 'putting living

lobsters and crabs into cold water, and then placing them on a fire

until the water is heated to boiling temperature, thereby causing them

to endure horrible and prolonged suffering.'

That the feathered tribes should share the protection which the issuing

of these placards is intended to subserve, is natural enough; seeing

that the Sea-bird, Wild-bird, and Wild-fowl Acts were due in great

measure to the Society. One placard states that it is a punishable

offence to kill or wound any such birds (including the young in nests)

within the prohibited period; and that those who sell such killed birds

are also punishable. Another placard administers a similar warning

in regard to wild-fowl, enumerating thirty-six species, all of which

are to be safe from the gun, the snare, and the net from the 15th of

February to the 10th of July, under penalties which are prescribed

in the Act of 1876. Bird-fanciers are reminded that one of their

fraternity was imprisoned for fourteen days for depriving a chaffinch

of its sight as a means of improving its singing. Poultry-dealers are,

in another hand-bill, cautioned against plucking live poultry, a cruel

practice which, if proved, subjects the offender to three months'

imprisonment. Carrying live fowls to market by their legs, with their

heads hanging downwards; and exposing fowls to hot sunshine with their

legs tied together--have brought the offenders into trouble. In another

placard the patrons of pigeon-matches are warned that occasional

cruelties practised by them or their servants come within the scope

of the law. In one of the Society's publications, the cruelty of

bearing-reins for carriage-horses is significantly pointed out.

The Society has been encouraged in its benevolent exertions by a letter

from Her Majesty the Queen, addressed in 1874 to the Earl of Harrowby,

in his capacity as President. There was an assembly in London of

foreign delegates representing similar associations, on the occasion

of the holding of the half-century jubilee of the parent Society. Her

Majesty requested the President to give expression publicly to her warm

interest in the success of the efforts made here and abroad for the

purpose of diminishing the cruelties practised on dumb animals. 'The

Queen hears and reads with horror of the sufferings which the brute

creation often undergo from the thoughtlessness of the ignorant, and

she fears also sometimes from the experiments in pursuit of science.

For the removal of the former the Queen trusts much to the progress

of education; and in regard to the pursuit of science, she hopes that

the advantage of those anæsthetic discoveries from which man has

derived so much benefit himself, in the alleviation of suffering, may

be fully extended to the lower animals. Her Majesty rejoices that the

Society awakens the interest of the young by the presentation of prizes

for essays connected with the subject, and hears with gratification

that her son and daughter-in-law shew their interest and sympathy by

presenting those prizes at your meetings.'

Looking to the distinguished patronage of the Society from Her Majesty

downwards, its vast array of supporters, and the large number of

Societies which it has helped to originate at home and abroad, we

naturally rely upon it for promoting a consolidation and expansion

of the laws against cruelty to animals. These laws, as has been

seen, are composed of shreds and patches, brought into existence with

difficulty, and in many respects imperfect. The time appears to have

come when the whole should be combined in a statute applicable to all

parts of the United Kingdom. That certain actions should be deemed

cruelties punishable by law in England and not in Scotland, is anything

but creditable, and not a little ludicrous. This is a point to which

the attention of legislators should be seriously invited. From the

fragmentary and confused condition of the statutes, we have experienced

much difficulty in ascertaining what, as a whole, the law really is.

This chaotic state of things detracts, we think, not a little from the

glory which may be freely claimed by the English for their legislation

in behalf of animals. A consolidated Act with all reasonable

improvements, would be something to point to with satisfaction, and

probably go far to insure a legalised system of kind treatment of

animals all over the globe.

W. C.

FROM DAWN TO SUNSET.

A STORY IN THREE PARTS.

BY ALASTER GRÆME.

INTRODUCTORY.

Every man loves the land where he got life and liberty. The heart of

the mountaineer is chained to his rugged mountain-home; he loves the

wild and whirling blast, the snow-storm and the brooding clouds. Every

true heart beats truly for country and for home. Thus the 'children of

the peat-bog' and the fen cling to the illimitable wolds and the 'level

shining mere,' beautiful even now.

Beautiful _then_, when long ago, primeval forests clothed the land.

When in later times the bells of minster towers sounded far and near,

and the deep bay of the Bruneswald hounds awoke the echoes of the

wold; when old Crowland's towers gleamed through mist; and the heights

of that far-famed isle, the Camp of Refuge, where, amidst blood and

battle, and beneath the 'White Christ' uplifted, the gallant Saxon

fought the wild Viking; where the Saxon made his last dread stand for

England's liberty, while men fell dead, and bones lay bleaching on

every island and valley of the fen.

Beautiful _now_, O Fen-land! where still I seem to hear the wild shout

of your outlaw hunters, hunting the red-deer and the wolf; where still

I seem to hear the war-cry of the men of Danelagh, or imagine the great

fires sweeping the boundless plains. Wide are your marshes still, and

dark and deep your woods; the keen winds bring the driving snow; dense

fog and mist and drenching rains sweep strongly from the sea; dark

and capricious are the autumn days, and full of storm; yet overhead

stretches a free heaven, boundless and open; underfoot stretch the

free plains, wide and open; and over all sweeps the magnificence of

the cloud-scenery, unbroken and unopposed; and the splendour of the

sunrise and the sunset lights the low isles like flame.

PART I.--DAWN.

CHAPTER THE FIRST.

Thus did the suns rise and set in glory across the level lands of

Enderby; old Enderby manor, where the Flemings had dwelt for centuries;

old Enderby, with its 'clanging rookery,' its grand timber, its

turrets and its towers. Under that arched gateway has swept many a gay

cavalcade with hawk and hound; has passed slowly many a hearse with

sable plumes and horses; has stepped many a brave bridegroom leading

his blushing bride, while the far-famed bells of Enderby pealed out

loud and clear.

It is nearly two centuries ago, and it is evening; the sun is setting.

Sir Vincent Fleming stands under the gateway; he is booted and spurred;

his jaded horse stands in the court-yard, and has been ridden fast

and far. Sir Vincent puts a whistle to his lips and whistles loud and

shrill; he is looking across the wide holt with a smile--his eyes laugh

under his thick black brows, and his long white hair is flowing free

in the wind. He opens his arms wide, and there come flying towards him

two little dark figures neck and neck, shrieking with laughter and with

glee. Panting, breathless from their long run, a boy and girl rush

through the gateway, and leap boisterously into Sir Vincent's arms.

'My two little pets of Enderby!' he cries, and there is a wail in his

voice, half of sorrow and half of joy.

'An' what have you brought us, father?' asks Deborah, leaping and

dancing in her gladness. 'I see your flaps are full!--Nay, Charlie; get

away; you shall not have father all to yourself!'

But the boy fights hard. 'You are a greedy Deb!' he cried. 'Your

thoughts are ever o' sweetmeats an' o' toys.'

'Nay; it is not so,' retorted Deborah shrilly and scarlet as a rose. 'I

am glad when things come.--But father, I am gladder to have _you_ come.'

'I believe thee, sweet heart!' and Sir Vincent, lifting little Deborah

to his shoulder, and taking his boy by the hand, turned towards the

house.

In those days many a care pressed hard on Sir Vincent Fleming. His

beautiful wife, the mother of his children, lay dead in the little

churchyard. For a short time the children had run wild; then for a time

Sir Vincent gave them a hard, hard step-mother, and the children went

from bad to worse. Little Deborah cut her hair like a boy, and the two

ran away from home. But ere long the hard step-mother died, leaving Sir

Vincent free and the children like two mad colts. Sir Vincent tried the

experiment no more. He could not cope with his two wild ones; they were

beyond him; they were given over entirely to old Dame Marjory, and she

voted them 'a handful.' Never wilder youngsters trod the earth. The

hot blood of the Flemings and the Stuarts, with a dash of cast not so

easily pedigree'd, coursed in their veins, and they could not brook a

word of opposition or reproof. Dearly did they love their father, and

dearly loved they one another--in a wild way more intensely than either

knew.

One day they were running in one of their mad games, 'Hare and

Hounds,' with all their village crew behind them, when their course led

straight through the churchyard of Enderby. Vaulting over the low wall,

they rushed bounding over the graves with yell and whoop and laughter.

Soon the whole gay thoughtless throng passed away. But an hour after,

in the twilight, a boy and girl came gliding back alone hand in hand;

half-wistful and half-scared, they opened the churchyard gate, Deborah

urging forward Charlie.

'What do you want?' asked the boy half sullenly. 'I'll not come!'

'I do want,' said little Deborah, 'to go to mother's grave! Dost know

what we did, Charlie? An' my heart has ached ever since, nor could I

hunt the hare for thinkin' of it. We trampled over mother's grave! When

we jumped over yon wall, I tell you, Charlie, we ran on mother's grave!

Come with me, Charlie, an' kneel down to her to forgive you an' me!' In

the highest state of excitement, the little child caught his unwilling

hand.

'But she won't hear us,' said the boy; 'mother's gone to heaven,

Marjory saith. Thou art a girl!' he cried, as they stood beside the

grave. 'These be bones that lie here. It is like your fancies! Mother's

gone to heaven, I tell you.'

'That's true,' said Deborah; 'but mother sees her grave, an' she

looks down an' has seen us run over it this day, an' laugh! Maybe she

thinks we have forgot her; maybe she thinks we have forgot the prayers

she taught us.--O mother, it is not so!' With unconscious and most

exquisite fervour, the little Deborah fell on her knees, and raised her

eyes and clasped hands to heaven: 'We are naughty, but we've not forgot

you, sweet mother. Charlie has not forgot you, mother; an' Charlie an'

me look up to you as you are lookin' down, an' ask you to forgive us

for treadin' on your sweet grave. Mother, dear mother, forgive us!'

The boy stood looking on in dogged silence, knitting his brows; but

when he saw Deborah's tears, tears rushed to his own bright eyes.

With a cry of passionate sorrow and remorse, he flung himself on

his mother's grave and cried as if his heart would break. Charlie

Fleming had idolised his mother. He was two years older than Deborah;

he remembered the mother better. He never forgot her memory. Proud,

reserved, and shy, he hid that memory in his heart, and would let no

hand drag it forth. In his mad freaks, when old Dame Marjory, driven

to distraction, solemnly upbraided him about his 'poor dear mother'

and what _she_ would have thought, he mocked, and ran away shouting

his derisive laughter. Seldom would a tear dim those bright roving

eyes; neither rod, nor threat, nor lecture made Charlie Fleming quail;

clenching his teeth and his hands, he stood his ground like a little

demon: his stubborn heart would have broken rather than yield a whit.

And what of Deborah Fleming? she who, at eight years old, cut her

flowing locks like a boy, and ran away from home. She was not behind

her brother in mischief, wit, or daring; wondrously bold was the spirit

of the little Fleming. But the caprices of the child shall speak for

themselves.

CHAPTER THE SECOND.

One afternoon Deborah was playing by the lodge-gates with little

Margaret Dinnage, the bailiff's child, when a tall gipsy woman strode

to the gate and looked through. Meg ran away with a scream of terror,

but Deborah stood and stared up at the gipsy.

She was a tall woman, dressed in faded red, with a yellow and scarlet

shawl tied over her head; long glittering rings in her ears, and black,

black eyes. Deborah never all her life forgot that woman looking

through the gate; the vision was riveted on her childish memory.

'Come to me, pretty one,' said the woman, tossing her head backward;

then imperiously: 'Come!'

'Where?' asked Deborah.

'Over yonder--to the camp. We want a pretty one like thee. I am gettin'

old, child, an' I want you to come run arrands an' tell the fortunes o'

the qual'ty.'

'_I_ am the quality,' said Deborah gravely.

'_You!_' retorted the gipsy, with sudden and savage scorn. 'You are o'

the scum o' the airth!' Then in a moment the wild passion passed, she

resumed her half-coaxing, half-imperative manner: 'Come, come, pretty

love!'

Deborah had been half startled; now she knew not what to make of the

gipsy woman. Did the gipsy really like her, and wish to be kind?

Deborah had never moved her large wondering eyes from the gipsy's face.

'I will not come,' she said, 'without Charlie.'

'Well, fetch Charlie, quick!' answered the gipsy with intense

eagerness, and stooping forward to whisper the words. Deborah drew

back; something within her rebelled; the woman was too imperious and

too bold.

'Charlie will not come,' she answered; 'he hates gipsies.'

'Then _thou_ shalt come alone.' Quick as thought the long arm was

thrust through the half-open gate and the iron hand round Deborah's

wrist, as if to draw her out, when Deborah cried at the top of her

voice: 'Jordan, Jordan, Jordan!' An old man in a red waistcoat and his

shirt sleeves came running round the lodge from the wood, and at the

same moment the gipsy woman, pushing Deborah violently backward, darted

away. Deborah was thrown on the back of her head; she got up at once,

and stood looking up at old Jordan in silence, with her hand at the

back of her head.

'She hath hurt thee, the jade!' said the old man indignantly. 'What has

she been a-sayin' and a-doin' to thee?'

Deborah gazed at her fingers: there was blood on them; she raised her

clear gray eyes to Jordan's face.

'Why, she hath cut thy head open, my lassie, and badly too! I know

them cussed gipsies! Spiteful demons! See ye never meddle with them

agen. This comes on it.' And assuming a scolding tone, the old man

took Deborah's hand and hurried her angrily into the lodge. He was

frightened, very pitiful and very angry, all in one; now he coaxed, now

he threatened.

'Let me bind up thy broken head, my lassie; it is broken badly. But

thou'rt a brave little lady! This comes o' meddlin'; thou'rt all too

inquisitive by half. Leave them gipsies alone; or sure as thou'rt

alive, I'll tell the master. Now then, thou'rt a brave little lady.

Doth it pain thee, Lady Deb?' He stooped to peer anxiously with his old

gray eyes into his little mistress's face.

Deborah was sitting on a high chair in the middle of the table,

looking very white and grave. 'I should think it doth,' she said; 'you

are a gaby to ask it, Jordan Dinnage. Finish to tie my head; and see

that you do not tell father who cast me down,' she added with dignity.

The little Margaret was standing below, gazing upward at the operation

in affright, with her round eyes and mouth wide open.

'_Tell thy father!_' retorted old Jordan with supreme disdain as he

finished his surgery. 'Why, he would burn the camp and all the varmin

in it for this. Fine times there'd be for Enderby with them revengeful

cats. They'd be burnin' Enderby. Where wouldst thou be then?'

'In the flames, Master Dinnage,' said Deborah coolly.

Old Jordan Dinnage laughed loud and long. 'Thou art a little bold

wench!' he said; then turning to his little daughter, added with mock

gravity: 'Mistress Dinnage, well mayst thou gape an' stare. Thy young

mistress will be the death o' me; for floutin' an' for scorn, I never

knew'd her equal.'

The little maiden went quietly home, rather proud of her bandaged head

than not; and the sight was so little novel to Dame Marjory's eyes,

that well as she loved the child, she scarcely asked a question. That

night Deborah tossed in her little bed and could not sleep. The pain in

her head she heeded not; her wild and fitful fancy was conjuring up the

gipsy camp. A hundred tall figures went trooping by, all with yellow

and scarlet shawls tied over their heads; and tall men with black eyes,

and little children, little boys with beautiful black eyes and curly

hair. Dogs were lying about, and great pots full of meat were slung on

poles over fires, and the red watch-fires blazed over all. She fancied

all these men, women, and children came and kneeled to her, and said

she was their queen. One little boy, more beautiful than the rest,

said he was destined for the king, and she would be his wife. Then

they hung about her necklets and bracelets, and set a crown upon her

head, and the little maiden saw herself queen of the gipsies. Deborah

loved power, and knew the power of beauty. She fancied herself dancing

before the gipsies, in the light of the fires, in a glitter and blaze

of beauty.

On the other side of the room slept Dame Marjory; she was snoring

loudly. Deborah, hot and excited, sat up and gazed round; she could

not rest. She started up, and sped like a little ghost into the next

room, to Charlie's bedside; she seized his arm, and shook it: 'Charlie,

Charlie!' The boy gave a cross snort. 'Charlie, art well awake? I have

somewhat to tell, love. The gipsy camp is out on the fen, an' to-morrow

I am goin' to visit them! You will come too Charlie, for there be dogs

an' horses in plenty. An' mayhap you will be made the king. _I_ mean to

be the queen; for the gipsy woman has been to the gate this afternoon,

an' invited me to go an' bring you along.'

Charlie stared in the dim light, well awake then, yet very cross.

'_You!_ You are always "bringin' me along," forgettin' you are the

youngest by two years. You are very wise an' grand. _I_ am not so fond

o' gipsy folk; they are sneaks and cowards.'

'Nay; they are not! If you are afeard, I'll go alone; an' I'll ride on

the vans from one end o' the world to the other. So good-e'en.'

'Stay!' cried the boy. 'You say I am afeard. Then you know it is a

_lie_! A Fleming never knew fear. So father tells you. Dost say I am

afeard?'

But Deborah, feeling the grasp of his hands on her arm, cried: 'Nay,

nay; you are not afeard! Belike you are wise, an' that is why. But I

will go alone.'

'Nay; that you shall not!' cried the boy, glad to see a way to change.

'Why, they would kill you,' he said, with an air of superior wisdom

and scorn. 'If you _will_ go, I go too. I will take my big stick, an'

(say not a word) a knife under my clothes, for the gipsy folk be sly

as foxes, an' in one minute might stick you through. I must be fully

armed.'

'An' so must I,' quoth Deborah.

'_You!_' said the boy in loud derision; 'you are a _girl_; though I

ne'er knew the like for tomboyin'. Run to bed; an' we will see what

to-morrow brings.'

CHAPTER THE THIRD.

The morrow saw Master Fleming and Mistress Deborah speeding along the

fields. Charlie carried a mighty stick, cut from a tough ash-tree,

and a knife beneath his skirts; Deborah too, secretly, had a long

blade concealed, to her own heart's satisfaction. Drawn to danger like

moths to candle-flare, these little hardy Flemings sought an adventure

after their own hearts. When they reached the level downs and the

long expanse of shining water, the gipsy camp burst full on view. It

was a sight familiar to their eyes; the dauntless Charlie knew it

well. Many an hour, when Dame Marjory, shut in with her pickles and

preserves, thought Master Fleming intent over his books, he was riding

a bare-backed pony on the downs amidst a ragged crew. Many a raid on

those same camps had Master Fleming dared; and twice, hunted by them,

had the bold boy fled for liberty, or life. So that, knowing the gipsy

nature, he did not approach the camp with Deborah without misgiving or

unprepared for flight.

'Now see; if the gipsies curse or hunt us,' he said to Deborah, as they

paused, 'that you do not lay hold on me, but run for your life; you can

run like a hare; so can I. They may not be best pleased to see us.'

With a heart that beat somewhat faster at her brother's words, Deborah

gave assent, and they advanced hand in hand. But in another moment

their approach was seen by one ragged sentinel, and with shrill cries

of delight they were surrounded by a weird elfin band. Their eyes were

beautiful and black, as in Deborah's vision; but upon close quarters,

they were all rags and dirt. They swarmed round their old playmate,

staring in dumb amaze at Deborah's fair loveliness. Charlie clutched

his stick.

'Now stand back!' he cried, in a loud authoritative voice, 'an' I will

give you copper pence.' He struck his stick on the ground, and the

ragged boys and girls all started back and stood in a circle round

them. Deborah was abashed and overwhelmed with admiration at her

brother's potent sway; her eyes were riveted upon him. The youthful

captain was aware of this, and with added dignity turned upon his

troop: 'First, first,' quoth he, 'you must catch two ponies for

Mistress Deborah an' for me, the biggest an' the best, an' we will race

you. The first one who wins gets the prize; an' if _I_ win or Mistress

Deborah wins, we win the prize, an' give it to the first man in: an'

that is fair play, seein' our ponies must be the biggest an' the best.

But stay. Come on the common, and let them not see us in the camp.

After the race is done, we will go an' speak to your grandam, old Dame

Shaw, and stay the night mayhap.'

With yells of glee the whole troop rushed hooting over the common,

tearing hither and thither after colts as tameless. Deborah's hat was

off and her hair flying, the soul of glee was dancing in her eyes. They

caught one restive steed; in a moment she was across his back like a

boy, and in another minute they were off! Thus the hours fled away,

all too fast for them; all the largess of the young captain was thrown

away and scrambled for. Deborah's dress flew in tatters round her; she

looked the wildest gipsy of them all.

Night came, and vainly through the shades of evening did old Dame

Marjory, shading her eyes in the doorway, look for her truants. Sir

Vincent was out, and not likely to return. At last she sought Jordan

Dinnage, her ancient lover and Enderby's right hand. 'Jordan, hast seen

Master Charlie and Lady Deb? A pretty kettle o' fish to fry if they

return not to-night, an' the master comes home i' the mornin'. Go seek

them, for heaven's sake, man. I am distraught!'

'Why, this comes, Mistress Marjory, o' lettin' the young Master run

wild; he's a handful for thee! I know'd how 'twould end, when he's day

an' night out gipsyin'. _There's_ where they be, Mistress Marjory, with

the gipsies; an' thank yer stars if ye ever set eyes on them agen!'

Old Marjory turned as white as her apron. 'Now, don't ye be goin' to

frighten me, Jordan. But if ye speak truth, man, run with all the men

you can get along, an' hunt them gipsies down, an' find my two poor

dears. O their poor mother! O Jordan, Jordan, Jordan Dinnage!' And

Marjory, with her apron to her face, cried as if her true heart would

break.

This was too much for Jordan; he was arming already. Snatching a short

rusty sword from the wall, and with one comforting hand-thud on Dame

Marjory's back, and a 'Comfort thee, my lass!' the active old man was

off. The hue-and-cry was raised--all Enderby rang with it. But behold

the gipsy camp was gone! Smouldering fires blackened the common; no

other trace of the fugitives was visible. But old Jordan rode and rode,

with all his men behind him; some on horseback, some on foot, they

scoured the country far and near. In vain did Dame Marjory and the

servants sit up till morning dawn. It was only late on the following

day that the bailiff rode up the avenue with another horseman, one

carrying a boy before him, the other a girl; the dresses of both men

and children were torn and travel-stained, and the head of Jordan

Dinnage tied up. At this sight Dame Marjory ran forward and screamed,

and all the women screamed.

'Here be thy childer,' said Jordan; 'an' a hard fight we made for it.

Keep a tight hand on 'em, Dame Marjory; but no scoldin' _yet_.'

So Charlie and Deborah, looking penitent and demure, but rejoicing

madly in their hearts at seeing home again, ran in. They were feasted

royally in the servants' hall that day!

* * * * *

For many days Sir Vincent did not return, and Jordan Dinnage kept a

sharp watch on the gate, to see that the children did not stir beyond.

The old vicar called on the little culprits; he looked to daunt them

by his words and presence. He was a sad-looking man with a long sallow

face; yet some quaint humour lurked in his nature too. Severely he bade

Dame Marjory send 'Master and Mistress Fleming' to him. The boy stoutly

rebelled; but at last hand in hand, scrubbed and ruffled, they were

ushered into the room where the awful vicar sat. Charlie was dressed

in a little black velvet doublet and hose, with silk stockings and

buckle-shoes, and ribbons at his knees; his long red-brown hair was cut

square on his white forehead, and flowed loose on his shoulders; his

lips were set firm, his brown brows were knit, and his eyes, large dark

and sombre like a stag's, glowered defiantly beneath them. Mistress

Deborah was dressed in pale blue silk, pointed to her fairy shape,

and trimmed with rose-coloured ribbons; her hair was in hue like her

brother's, and cut the same in front, but falling lower behind, and

tied at the end with a bow; her lips were apart, and her white teeth

gleamed with irrepressible humour; her large bright eyes, gray like a

falcon's, gleamed with laughter too; she half hung behind her brother,

with her head upon his shoulder, saucy yet shy.

The vicar, in his long black clothes, gazed upon the pretty picture

from a high-backed chair, stern, melancholy, resigned. The little

Flemings stood before him just as they had entered. 'Children,' quoth

the vicar of Enderby, 'it hath afforded me great grief to hear of

thy misdeeds; they have been reprehensible in the extreme. Thou hast

encouraged vagabondism, and run near becoming vagabonds thyselves; in

fine, thou hast outraged propriety and set all social laws at defiance.

To thee, Charles, I should have looked, in thy father's absence, to

set an example to thine inferiors, to guard the house, and to protect

thine infant sister (or little better than an infant, either in years

or discretion). Thou hast proved thyself, Charles, incapable of either

charge; indeed, if thou art not sent to school, to feel a master's

rod, I entertain great fears for thy future, and so I shall inform thy

father. To thee, Mistress Deborah, I say little; thou art young and

inexperienced, though much given to vanity, it is said, both in dress

and person; but though thou art as yet incorrigible, I would have thee

reform, and entertain some hopes of thee. Thou art the future mistress

of this house; how then, when thou comest to years of discretion, wilt

thou fulfil thy duties of mistress and of hostess, if thou dost now run

wild amid grooms and gipsies? Mistress Fleming, Mistress Fleming, I

have much against thee! What induced thee the second time to run away

from such a home as this?'

But Deborah only hung her head and smiled.

Then quoth Charlie sturdily, glowering with his red-brown eyes: 'She

loves the gipsies, like to me.'

'Charles, Charles!' said the vicar, 'I will not bandy words with thee.

Forsake such evil company, and stick to thy Latin more.'

'I don't love Latin, Master Vicar, an' never shall.'

'Goodsooth, thou wilt and shall. What wouldst thou be? Wouldst idle

here all thy days?'

'I'd be a soldier.'

'A soldier? An ungodly set!'

'Father says the priests are the ungodly ones.'

At this the vicar held his peace in despair.

'I'd be a gipsy queen,' chimed in Deborah's treble voice. 'Dost not

love the gipsies, Master Vicar? When I am a woman grown I'll run off

and travel over the world--I will! Charlie does not love Latin; no more

do I love Dame Marjory's lessons.' And forgetting her fear, she nestled

up to the vicar's side and gazed up with her laughing dauntless eyes.

At that moment the clank of horse's hoofs resounded on the stones of

the court-yard.

A TYROLESE CATASTROPHE.

Many and varied are the calamities to which those people are exposed

who have their abodes among the grim mountain fastnesses of Switzerland

and the Tyrol, or indeed who live in any similarly situated region,

where Nature still reigns in undisputed majesty, and manifests her

power by those swift and awful catastrophes which strike terror to

the hearts of all who come within their influence. In winter the snow

falls heavily and constantly, and forms a huge overhanging mass, that

overtops the often narrow pass below, and is suspended, like the sword

of Damocles, by the slightest possible retaining hold; a trifling

noise, such as the discharge of a rifle or even the prolonged blast

of the Alpine horn, being sometimes sufficient to dislodge the vast

snow-wreath, and send it gliding on its silent but deadly course

towards the valley beneath. The destruction caused by the overwhelming

avalanche is too well known to need description. Scarcely a Swiss

hamlet or mountain pass but has its record of some sad calamity caused

by the resistless force of those fatal snow-falls. Single travellers,

parties varying in number, châlets, and even entire villages, have on

different occasions been buried under the snow; no warning having been

afforded to the hapless victims till the icy pall of death descended

relentlessly upon them, and hid them, sometimes for long months,

sometimes for ever, from their fellow-men.

Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 714 September 1, 1877 · 第 1 / 4 段