AMESBURY ABBEY: ITS HISTORY, ANCIENT AND MODERN.

THE river Avon, on its course to the sea, passes through a beautiful,

thickly wooded valley in Wiltshire, in which lies Amesbury, or, to follow

the old spelling, Ambresbury, signifying the land of Ambrosius. This

fascinating place, and the wild country surrounding it, possess a charm

and beauty all their own, and those born and bred there ever pine for the

breezy downs, as the Swiss for their mountains or north-country people

for the moorland; and no one who has walked or ridden on some glorious

summer morning over the fine, close grass clothing these Wiltshire downs

can ever forget its delicious “springy” quality underfoot. A talented

modern artist once happily christened Amesbury “The Golden Valley;” he

saw it in the spring, at which season of the year the whole country-side

seems ablaze with brilliant yellow flowers.

[Picture: The Palladian Bridge]

Amesbury lies eight miles north of Salisbury, and we may consider that it

occupies a space in the midst of that vast tract of undulating country

that (somewhat erroneously to my mind) is given the name of “Salisbury

Plain.” I now propose to trace, as briefly as I can, some of the history

of this interesting and beautiful place. Its antiquity is so great as to

take us back to pre-historic times. In its near neighbourhood many

desperate battles were fought between Briton, Saxon, and Roman with

varying success. Lewis, in his ancient _History of Britain_, says: “In

the reign of Vortigern, 461 A.D., a Conference was appointed to take

place near the Abbey of Ambri, with Hengist the Saxon, and it was agreed

that both parties should come without armour. But Hengist, under colour

of peace, devised the subversion of all the nobility of Britain, and

chose out to come to this assembly his faithfullest and hardiest men,

commanding every one of them to hide under their garment a long knife,

with which, when he should give the watchword, every one should kill the

Briton next him. Both sides met upon the day appointed, and, treating

earnestly upon the matter, Hengist suddenly gave the watchword and caught

Vortigern by the collar, upon which the Saxons, with their long knives,

violently murdered the innocent and unarmed Britons. Thus were 460 earls

and noblemen of the Britons treacherously murdered. They were buried in

the convent at Amesbury. This massacre took place near Stonehenge, where

repeated battles were fought between Ambrosius and Hengist.” {10}

There is a fanciful legend, told by an old writer called Geoffrey of

Monmouth, about Stonehenge. He says that Ambrosius, wishing to

commemorate those who had fallen in battle, thought fit to send for

Merlin the Wizard, to consult him on the proper monument to be erected to

the memory of the slain. On being interrogated Merlin replied, “Send for

the ‘Giants’ Dance,’ which is in Killarus (Kildare), a mountain in

Ireland; they are stones of a vast magnitude, and if they can be placed

here quite round this spot of ground they will stand _for ever_.” At

these words Aurelius laughed and said, “How was it possible to remove

such stones from so distant a country, and had not Britain as good

stones?” Merlin replied “that they were mystical stones and had a

medicinal virtue,” whereupon the Britons resolved to send for them and to

risk a battle. Upon landing in Ireland, the removal of the stones was

violently opposed by Gillomanius, a youth of wonderful valour. At the

head of a vast army, he exclaimed, “While I have life they shall not take

from us the least stone of the Giants’ Dance.” A battle ensued, which

was won by the Britons. They then proceeded to Killarus, where the sight

of the stones filled them with joy and admiration, and, while they were

all standing round, Merlin asked them to try and remove the stones.

Their efforts proving futile, he laughingly proceeded with his own

contrivances, and took down the stones with incredible facility. This

done, they set sail to Britain, and repaired to the burial-place with the

stones, Aurelius ordering Merlin to get them up in the same manner as

they had been in the mountain of Killarus, which he accordingly did.

Queen Elfrida, who performed many penances and built monasteries in

atonement for the crime of the murder of her step-son, Edward the Martyr,

founded a Benedictine nunnery at Amesbury in 980. This nunnery

flourished for many years, until the ill-conduct of the nuns caused King

Henry II. to expel them (1177), and place them under stricter discipline

in other religious houses. He then gave the monastery of Ambresbury to

the Abbey of Fontevrault, in Normandy. This order was founded by Robert

d’Arbrissel about the end of the eleventh century. It is looked upon as

a singularity in the church, some finding it strange to see an abbess

exercising equal authority over men as well as women. Before his death

d’Arbrissel appointed Petronilla de Craou Chemille as head and chief of

his order, of which he drew up statutes, putting them under the order of

St. Benedict. Under the new rule, this monastery increased in splendour

and royal favour, King John conferring upon it important privileges.

Eleanor, only daughter of Geoffrey, Earl of Bretagne, was buried,

according to her own request, at Ambresbury in 1241. Mary, sixth

daughter of Edward I., together with thirteen young ladies of royal

birth, took the veil in 1283; and two years afterwards, anno 1287,

Eleanor, queen of Henry III., entered the order, and died and was buried

at Ambresbury in 1292. The monastery continued to prosper, and became

one of the richest in England. The following names of the prioresses

have been preserved:—Isabella of Lancaster, fourth daughter of Henry,

Earl of Lancaster; Joan de Gennes; Sibilla de Montacute; Katherine of

Arragon lodged within the convent walls on her first arrival in England

in 1501.

[Picture: Chinese Summer House]

At the time of the Reformation, the last prioress (but one), Florence

Bormewe, refused to surrender her monastery to the King’s emissaries.

They wrote: “Albeit we have used as many ways with her as our poor wits

could attain, yet in the end we could not by any persuasion bring her to

any conformity, but at all times she resteth and so remaineth in these

terms.” She answered, “If the King’s Highness command me to go from this

house I will gladly go, though I beg my bread, and as for pension I care

for none.” The death of this brave prioress saved her from further

humiliation.

Joan Darell was abbess at the time of the Dissolution; she surrendered to

King Henry VIII. Dec. 4th, 1540.

The old Chronicle of Geoffrey of Monmouth gives Amesbury as the place of

Queen Guinevere’s penitential retirement. The modern poet, Tennyson,

takes the same view:

“Queen Guinevere had fled the Court and sat

There in the holy house at Almesbury.”

Antiquarians disagree as to whether the fine church now standing—with its

lancet windows, pointed arches, and massive turret—is the old abbey

church, or only that of the parish. In an obscure corner at the back of

the church is found a window of quite another description—very beautiful,

and more approaching to the “rose” style of architecture. Of the old

stained glass only a few broken fragments remain. On one piece is a

picture of a fair-haired, long-necked woman suppose to represent Queen

Guinevere.

The churchyard (lying to the south of the old church), with its grey

tombstones and dark green yew-trees, has a solemn, calm and peaceful air.

Over a grave is found the following epitaph:—

“Altho’ his body here doth lye

Till the last trump doth it raise,

His soul is now in heaven high

And sings Jehovah’s praise.”

I now finish my description of Amesbury’s monastic period and turn to the

modern years. According to a good authority, Henry VIII. bestowed

Amesbury upon Edward, Earl of Hertford, afterwards Duke of Somerset and

Lord Protector in the succeeding reign. After his trial, death sentence,

and execution, the lands were confiscated by the Crown till the reign of

Queen Elizabeth, who probably restored them to the Protector’s son,

Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford. This gentleman was thrice married, his

last wife being a widow of fascinating beauty and charm. She had

previously been engaged to Sir George Rodney, who loved her madly, but,

being ambitious, she left him for Lord Hertford. The day before the

marriage, Sir George Rodney travelled to the inn at Amesbury and waited

for the home-coming of the bride and bridegroom. All the night he

occupied himself by composing a dying love song written with his own

blood. Upon the arrival in the village of his false love, he went to

greet her, and fell upon his sword and expired at her feet. I give the

following extract from the poem, which is somewhat long and tedious:—

“Sir George Rodney before he killed himself—

What shall I do that am undone,

Where shall I fly myself to shunne?

Ah mee! myselfe must kill,

And yet I die against my will.

In starry letters I behold

My death in the Heavens enrolled.

There finde it wrytt in skyes above

That I (poore I) must die for love.

’Twas not my love deserved to die,

O no! it was unworthy I.

I for her love should not have dyde,

But that I had no worth beside.

Ah mee! that love such woe procures,

For without her no love endures.

I for her vertues her doe serve,

Doth such a love a death deserve?”

Lady Hertford presented a bell to the parish of Amesbury. An inscription

on it runs thus:—

“Be stronge in faythe, prayes God well.

Frances, Countess Hertford’s bell.”

[Picture: Kent House]

After the Seymour period, the Amesbury estates passed through different

hands, belonging in 1720 to Henry, Lord Carleton; he having purchased

them from Charles, Lord Bruce, son of the Earl of Ailesbury. Lord

Carleton left them by will to his nephew, Charles, Duke of Queensberry,

in 1724, who married the charming Lady Catherine Hyde in 1720. This

couple spent much time at Amesbury, altering and improving it in various

ways, and entertaining their friends.

The poet Gay was a devoted friend and admirer of the Duchess, who,

indeed, seems to have been an attractive woman of immense spirit and wit.

She offended George II. and his Queen by her defence of Gay’s play, the

_Beggars’ Opera_, and was forbidden the Court for some time; but she,

standing firmly by her friend, refused to retract or alter her

sentiments, and finally forced the Court to receive and forgive her.

Here is a copy of her message to the King:—

“_Feb._ 27_th_, 1729.

“That the Duchess of Queensberry is surprised and well pleased the

King has given her so agreeable a command as to stay from Court,

where she never came for diversion, but to bestow a civility upon the

King and Queen. She hopes, by such an unprecedented order as this,

that the King will see as few as he wishes at his Court, particularly

such as dare to think or speak truth. I dare not do otherwise, and

ought not nor could not have imagin’d that it would not have been the

very highest compliment that I could possibly pay the King, to

endeavour to support truth and innocence in this house.

(Signed) “C. QUEENSBERRY.”

The following is an extract from a letter from Gay to Swift:—“To the lady

I live with I owe my life and fortune; think of her with respect, value

and esteem her as I do. She hath so much goodness, virtue, and

generosity, that if you knew her you would have a pleasure in obeying her

as I do.” In another letter from Gay to Swift, the former presses his

coming to join the party at Amesbury, saying (speaking of the

Duchess):—“I think her so often in the right, you will have great

difficulties to persuade me she is in the wrong. The lady of the house

is not given to show civility to those she does not like. She speaks her

mind and loves truth, for the uncommonness of the thing. I fancy your

curiosity will prevail over your fear, and you will like to see such a

woman. But I say no more till I know whether her Grace will fill up the

rest of the paper.” P.S. by the Duchess: “Write I must, particularly

now, as I have an opportunity to indulge my predominant passion of

Contradiction. I do, in the first place, contradict most things Mr. Gay

says of me to deter you from coming here, which, if ever you do, I hereby

assure you that, unless I like my own way better, you shall have yours;

and in all disputes you shall convince me if you can. But, by what I see

of you, this is not a misfortune that will always happen, for I find you

a great mistaker. For example, you take prudence for imperiousness.

’Tis from this I first determined not to like one who is too giddy-headed

for me to be certain whether or no I shall ever be acquainted with him.

I have known people take great delight in building castles in the air;

but I should choose to build friendship on a more solid foundation. I

would fain know you, for I often hear more likeable things than ’tis

possible any one can deserve. Pray come that I may find out something

wrong, for I, and I believe most women, have an inconceivable pleasure to

find out any faults except their own.” P.S.—“Mr. Gay is very peevish

that I spell and write ill, but I don’t care, for neither the pen nor I

can do better!”

[Picture: The Diamond]

This Duchess also attracted the attention of Prior, who wrote the

well-known ballad:—

A sentimental & practical guide to Amesbury and Stonehenge · 第 13 / 78 题