Camden states that in the reign of Edward III., the King got together

a powerful army and fleet for the purpose of invading France, and the

town provided twenty ships and 264 mariners for the siege of Calais;

but these figures are disputed by Hackluit, who says there were but

fifteen ships and 263 mariners. In March, 1347, the bailiffs of

Weymouth seized all the goods, chattels, jewels, and armour of Geoffry,

Earl of Harcautly, who had joined the army of the French King. In 1377

the town suffered considerably from the fleet of Charles V., when great

portions of the ports of Dartmouth, Plymouth, Portsmouth, Hastings, and

Weymouth were destroyed.

The next event of importance was the landing here, on April 14th, 1471,

of Margaret of Anjou, the consort of Henry VI., on her return from

France with her son, Prince Edward.

So the tide of history swept on, with periodical ravages from pirates

and enemies, until the appearance off the harbour of a large foreign

fleet of eighty sail, which had voyaged from Middleburg on January

10th, 1505, to escort Philip and Johanna to their Kingdom of

Castile; but a violent hurricane caused the ships to run to Weymouth

for shelter. The inhabitants, being unaware of the quality of their

visitors, and alarmed at so formidable an array of vessels, speedily

armed themselves, and sent word to Sir Thomas Trenchard, at Wolfeton,

who, with Sir John Carew, marched into the town at the head of some

hastily improvised troops. On the rank of the visitors becoming known,

Sir Thomas invited them to his house at Wolfeton until he could advise

the King, Henry VII., of the fortuitous circumstance. As soon as Henry

had notice of the arrival of these royal visitors, he despatched the

Earl of Arundel with a troop of 300 horse, carrying torches, to escort

them to London.

There is much in the minor history of the town that one would fain

linger over, but we must confine ourselves to those larger and more

far-reaching historical events with which the old life of Weymouth was

so closely bound up.

In 1544 the bailiffs of Weymouth received the following letter from the

King, Henry VIII.:—

(By the King.)

Henr. R.

Trustie and well beloved, we greate you well. And whereas betweene us

and the Emperor upon provocation of manyfolde injuries committed by

the Frenche Kyng unto us both particularlie; And for his confederation

wyth the Turke, against ye whole commonwealthe of Christendome. It ys

agreede that eche of us aparte, in person, with his puissant Armie in

several parties this soommer, shall invade the Realme of Fraunce; and

beyng not yet furneyshed as to our honour appertayneth:—

We have appoynted you to send us the nombre of xv hable fotemen, well

furneyshed for the warres as appertayneth, whereof iii to bee archers,

every oone furneyshed with a goode bowe in a cace, with xxiii goode

arrows in a cace, a goode sworde, and a dagger, and the rest to be

billmen, havyng besydes theyre bill, a goode sworde, and a dagger, to

be levyed of your owne servants and tenants.

And that you put the saide nombre in such a redyness, furnished with

coats and hosen of such colours as is appointed for the battel of our

Armey.

As they faile not within oone houres warnyng to march forward to such

place as shall be appoynted accordinglie:—

Yeven under our Sygnete at our palace of Westmr., the v^{th} daie of

June, the xxxv yere of our reigne.

Henr. R.

Weymouth had been created a borough in the reign of Edward II., at the

time that his nephew, Gilbert of Clare, Earl of Gloucester, was lord

of the manor (one of whose sisters had married Piers Gaveston, and the

other sister was the wife of Hugh le Despencer); and although the town

is styled a “burg” in several documents relating to previous reigns, it

was not until the nineteenth year of the reign of Edward II. that it

returned a representative to Parliament.

The borough of Weymouth and the adjoining one of Melcombe (which

together now make up modern Weymouth) had long viewed each other

with jealous eyes; and so many complaints being made through their

respective members, the Parliament prepared a charter, at the

suggestion of Cecil, it is said, which was approved by Queen Elizabeth

in the thirteenth year of her reign, which united these two discordant

elements into one borough.

The merchants of the town, like all those of our southern ports, played

a zealous and active part in fitting out ships to fight the Armada; and

from a MS. in the Cottonian Library we learn that the following vessels

set out from Weymouth in 1588, with instructions to guard the coast and

seek out the Invincible Armada:—

Name. Tonnage. Master. Men.

_The Gallion_ 100 Richard Miller 50

_The Catherine_ 60 30

_The Heath Hen_ 60 30

_The Golden Lion_ 120 60

_The Sutton_ 70 Hugh Preston 40

_The Expedition_ 70 50

[Illustration: A Relic of the Armada.]

Notwithstanding that their largest vessel was only of 120 tons, the

Weymouth contingent captured two of the galleons and brought them as

prizes into the harbour. The only other vessels sent by the county

on this occasion were two from Lyme Regis—_The Revenge_, of 60 tons,

and _The Jacob_, of 90 tons—and four from Poole. In the Guildhall

there is a memorial of the event in the shape of a massive iron-bound

chest (_see illustration_), believed to have been brought from one

of the captured galleons; and many other relics are scattered over

the county, as at Bingham’s Melcombe, where there is a magnificent

oval dining-table, of massive form and marvellous workmanship, with

the crest of a Spanish grandee in the centre, the whole mounted on a

sea-chest in lieu of legs. Many Spanish coins have been washed ashore

on the Chesil Bank, and it is possible that others of the ill-fated

ships sank in the vicinity of Portland, or that the dons threw their

money and valuables overboard rather than let them fall into the hands

of their captors.

Little is recorded during the next fifty years, save the building of a

wooden bridge of seventeen arches to unite the two towns, in 1594; and

thirteen years later the town was visited by one of those great plagues

which periodically swept over mediæval England.

The outbreak of the Civil War in 1642 found the county fairly evenly

divided in support of the rival parties, and Corfe Castle became the

headquarters of the Royalist, and Bingham’s Melcombe that of the

Parliamentary forces. In 1643 the Earl of Carnarvon seized and held

for the King, Weymouth, Melcombe, and Portland, and left them in

charge of Prince Maurice, whose troops are said to have pillaged and

ravaged the district. The following year the Earl of Essex defeated

the Royalist troops, and took the town for the Parliament, when he

was assisted by a fleet under the Lord High Admiral, the Earl of

Warwick. The towns proved a rich prize for the captors, as, in addition

to much ammunition, etc., no less than sixty ships fell into their

hands. The troubles of the inhabitants, however, were far from over,

as in 1645 Sir Lewis Dyves received orders from the King to make

an attempt to re-capture Weymouth, which, with the help of Sir W.

Hastings, the Governor of Portland, he succeeded in doing, and drove

the defenders across the harbour into Melcombe. On June 15th, 1644, the

town surrendered to the Parliamentary Commander, Sir William Balfour,

the final overthrow being largely due to the Earl of Warwick, who

appeared off the harbour with a large fleet, originally mobilised

for the relief of Lyme Regis. The spoils of war which fell into the

hands of the captors included 100 pieces of ordnance, 2,000 muskets,

150 cases of pistols, 200 barrels of powder, and 1,000 swords, in

addition to sixty ships of various tonnage lying in the harbour. The

losses sustained by the combined towns in the Civil War amounted to

£20,000, as a certificate from the Justices, in the Parliamentary Roll,

testifies. The town to-day shows no trace of the fierce bombardments it

underwent, but a house in Maiden Street has a “bogus” memento in the

shape of a cannon ball foolishly inserted in the masonry some decades

since.

[Illustration: Sandsfoot Castle]

In 1649 the inhabitants petitioned Parliament for a grant of £3,000, to

enable them to enlarge Melcombe Church, build a new bridge, and free

the harbour from rubbish.

[Illustration: Doorway Sandsfoot Castle]

The “Old Castle,” otherwise Sandsfoot Castle, situated about half a

mile from Weymouth proper, is to-day nothing but a mere shell of the

former stronghold. It was built by Henry VIII., about 1539, and was

part of his scheme for the fortification of various parts of the coast,

particularly Portsmouth, Portland, and Weymouth, against a possible

invasion on the part of Papal Europe on his throwing off the Roman yoke

in 1540. Leland calls it “a right goodlie and warlyke castel, havyng

one open barbicane.” The existing masonry shows its form to have been

a parallelogram, and from its commanding position it, no doubt, was a

fortress of considerable strength. It is difficult to identify, from

its crumbling remains, the various portions of the castle, but that

portion to the north, from its vaulted character, appears to have been

the Governor’s apartment; while fronting south was the gun platform, as

the embrasure shows. This platform would also flank its east and west

sides, which were also pierced for big guns, while almost level with

the ground was the barbican, with two tiers of loop-holes for small

arms.

On a tombstone at Whitchurch Canonicorum is the following inscription:—

Here lyeth Iohn Wadham of Catherstone, Esquyer, who deceased A.D.

1584, who was dewring his life time Captayne of the Queene’s Ma^{ties}

castell called Sandesfote, besides Waymouth in the countye of Dorset.

Among its other Governors were George Bamfield, 1631; Sir Anthony

Ashley Cooper, 1643; Colonel Ashburnham and Colonel William Sydenham,

1644; and Humphrey Weld, of Lulworth, 1685. It is a matter for regret

that this old building should have been so neglected, as each year sees

large masses of its masonry falling over the cliff. As a writer as long

ago as 1829 said:

Its remains even now attract many an inquisitive enquiry as to why it

has been so neglected, as where the neighing of hostile steeds, and

the busy clang of arms once sounded to the battle’s din, the humble

grass now grows, its walls are the dormitories of the birds of the

air, and its rooms afford pasturage to the cattle; a change certainly

more gratifying to us as a nation; but still its bold towering

appearance, as seen ascending the hill, or viewing it from the hill,

reminds us of some bygone tale.

In addition to the castle, the town was further protected by several

forts. Probably none of these were in the nature of permanent

fortifications, except the Blockhouse, which stood near the east end

of Blockhouse Lane. The New Fort, or Jetty Fort, was erected at the

entrance of the harbour, at the end of the old pier, and was dismantled

in 1661, although in Hutchins’ time three guns were placed in position

on the same site. Then there was Dock Fort, under the hill, west of

the Jetty Pier, St. Nicholas’ Chapel converted into a fort by the

Parliamentary troops, and a small fort called the Nothe Fort.

Few events seem to have occurred during the Protectorate that need

recording beyond the great naval victory gained by Blake over Van

Tromp, off Portland; and, as some compensation for the damage done to

their property during the reign of his father, Charles II. granted the

town in 1660 an annuity of £100 a year for ten years from the Customs’

dues. It was during this reign that tradesmen coined small money or

tokens for the convenience of those wishing to buy small quantities

of goods, as but little small money was coined by authority. In 1594

the Mayor of Bristol was granted permission to coin a token, and the

benefit to the community proved so great that the custom spread to

other towns. Weymouth coined many of these tokens (_see illustration_),

which were made of copper, brass, or lead, and decorated as fancy

dictated. Every person and tradesman in the town was obliged to take

them, and they undoubtedly answered the purpose of providing the people

with small money. In 1672, however, Charles II. ordered to be coined

a sufficient number of half-pence and farthings for the exigencies

of the State, and these _numorum famuli_ were prohibited as being an

infringement of the King’s prerogative.

[Illustration:

The Town Token

Thomas Hyde

Bartholomew Beer

James Stanley

James Budd

Some Weymouth

Tokens]

The grant of armorial bearings to Weymouth and Melcombe Regis bears the

date of May 1st, 1592. The seals of the town were eight in number, a

description of which is recorded in Ellis’s _History of Weymouth_.

When the ill-starred Duke of Monmouth landed at Lyme Regis in 1685,

no Weymouthians seem to have flocked to his standard. Upon the

failure of the rebellion the participants of the neighbourhood were

quickly disposed of by Judge Jeffreys, who opened his Bloody Assize

at Dorchester, and ordered them to be hanged at Greenhill, and their

bodies to be dismembered and exhibited throughout the county as a

warning to rebels.

[Illustration: Arms of Weymouth]

So we come down to the close of the seventeenth century with little to

record save devastating fires, plagues, and storms. A general period of

poverty and depression seems then to have overtaken the two towns. The

causes leading to this change, which had begun to show itself in the

reign of Elizabeth, were many and various, and may be briefly ascribed

to the concrete result of the vicious rule of the Stuarts, the removal

of the wool trade to Poole, the loss of the Newfoundland trade, and

the injury received during the Civil War. Ellis tells us that, at the

beginning of the eighteenth century, “scarcely any idea can be formed

of the general devastation and depression that everywhere prevailed.

Houses were of little value ... the population had dwindled to a mere

nothing ... old tenements fell down ... the inhabitants consisted

chiefly of smugglers and fishermen.”

Before we turn to the brighter days which set in towards the middle

of the reign of George III., a short account must be given of the

larger memorials of the town—_e.g._, the old bridge, the priory, and

the parish church, although it must be confessed that of important

antiquities dating before the Georgian era the town has little to show

beyond a few remnants of Jacobean houses, part of one solitary pillar

of the chapel, and possibly a few old doorways; and in later and minor

memorials the town is little better off. There is, in the Guildhall,

the fine iron-bound chest before mentioned, and another, said to be

of similar origin, bequeathed by the late Sir Richard Howard. There is

also an ancient chair with a cardinal’s hat carved on the back, and

the old stocks and whipping-post; but for the most part nothing has

survived save the truly Georgian, such as round windows, picturesque

doorways, and part of the old Gloucester Lodge, now an hotel—an

altogether disappointing record in comparison with the long and varied

history of the place.

[Illustration: Old House on North Quay. Weymouth]

Of the old chapel,[52] the one remaining stone is preserved in the

wall of a school. The chapel was a chapel of ease to Wyke Regis, the

mother-church of Weymouth, and was dedicated to St. Nicholas. It stood

on the summit of a hill overlooking the old town of Weymouth, and its

site is commemorated in the name “Chapelhaye,” by which the district is

known. There are several documents extant relating to this chapel, and

among extracts from the _Liceirce_ is the following:—

None shall fail at the setting forth of the procession of Corpus

Christi day, on pain of forfeiting one pound of wax, and each brother

shall pay six pennies to the procession, and pay yearly.

This relates to the fraternity or guild in the Chapel of St. Nicholas,

which was founded by a patent granted in 20 Henry VIII. to Adam

Moleyns, Dean of Sarum, and certain parishioners of Wyke Regis, and

known as “The Fraternity or Guild of St. George in Weymouth.”

[Illustration: Old Chair at Weymouth.]

Before the building of a bridge across the harbour the means of direct

communication between the two towns was, so Leland says in 1530, by

means of a boat, drawn over by a rope affixed to two posts, erected on

either side of the harbour, a contrivance which was in use at Portland

Ferry as late as 1839. In 1594 this primitive method of crossing gave

way on the erection of the wooden bridge before referred to, erected

at the expense of several wealthy merchants of London, who appear to

have had trading interests here. This, in its turn, was so seriously

injured during the Civil Wars, that it fell to pieces, and was rebuilt

in 12 Anne by Thomas Hardy, Knt., William Harvey, James Littleton,

and Reginald Marriott, the towns’ Parliamentary representatives, and

it continued in use until 1741, when a bridge sixty yards long, with

a draw-bridge in the centre, took its place. The celebrated Bubb

Dodington, the first and only Lord Melcombe, contributed largely to its

cost. In 1770 another bridge was erected some seventy yards westward,

thus increasing the length of the harbour; but as the inhabitants were

forced to make a considerable detour to reach it, they petitioned

against the proposed alteration, but to no purpose. In 1820 it was

determined to erect the first bridge of stone,[53] which is still in

use, and only calls for mention here from the fact that on pulling down

some adjacent houses an urn filled with silver coins of Elizabeth,

James I., and Charles I. was found; and it is said that some of the

inhabitants had a fine haul of “treasure trove” on this occasion. More

interesting, perhaps, was the discovery of a gilt brass crucifix,

four inches long; and on the wall of one of the demolished houses was

painted the following verse:—

God saue our Queene Elizabethe,

God send hir happie dayes;

God graunt her grace to

Persevir in his most holie wayes.

A. Dom. 1577.

The old priory, or, as it was more commonly called, the “Friary,” stood

in Maiden Street. It was a house of the Dominican Friars, dedicated

in the name of St. Winifred, although Speed gives Dominic as the

dedicatory saint. Leland writes of it as “a fayre house of Freres in

the est part of the town.” The ancient chair now in the Guildhall

came from this priory, and it was said to possess miraculous powers of

healing the sick, and otherwise blessing the devout who were privileged

to sit upon it. The priory shared the fate of the other monastic

foundations at the Dissolution.

Of churches which can be rightly considered as memorials, Weymouth

has no example, as the oldest is that of St. Mary, the parish church.

The foundation-stone was laid on October 4th, 1815; this church was

erected partly on the site of a former church. It is a large, simple,

and unpretentious building, of which some hard things have been said

and written, but it is at least well built and free from sham, although

of its architecture the less said the better. It is, however, somewhat

redeemed by an excellently designed cupola containing one bell. Inside,

an altar-piece by Sir James Thornhill, a native of the town, whose

daughter married his pupil Hogarth, claims attention; as also does the

following curious inscription, in which the artist, by contracting

the word “worthiest,” has conveyed the very opposite estimate of the

deceased’s character to that intended:—

UNDERTH LIES YE BODY OF

CHRISR. BROOKS ESQ. OF JAMAICA

WHO DEPARD. THIS LIFE 4 SEPR. 1769

AGED 38 YEARS, ONE OF YE WORST. OF MEN

FRIEND TO YE DISTRESD.

TRULY AFFECTD. & KIND HUSBAND

TENDER PART. & A SINCR. FRIEND.

An old chalice belonging to the former church which stood on this site

was in the possession of Mr. Ellis. It was made of pewter, weighed

(without the lid, which was missing) 4½ lbs., and held four pints.

On the front was engraved:

HOLINESS UNTO THE LORD,

ZACH. XIV., VER. 20.

JOHN STARR,

CHURCHWARDEN,

1633.

About the middle of the eighteenth century a gentleman of Bath, Ralph

Allen (the original of Fielding’s “Squire Allworthy”), having been

recommended sea-bathing for his health, found the shore of Melcombe so

suitable for his purpose that he spoke of it to the Duke of Gloucester.

His Royal Highness came, sampled the salt water, and built Gloucester

Lodge, to which house he shortly afterwards invited the King, George

III., who spent eleven weeks here, with his Queen and family, in the

summer of 1789. The result of this and subsequent visits was that His

Majesty purchased the house and converted it into a royal residence. A

great stimulus was thus given to the town, which entered upon a period

of prosperity; for here George III. held court, and heard the news of

some of Nelson’s and Wellington’s victories. Very gay, indeed, was

the life of those days, with music, feasting, and dancing, which took

place in what is now called “the Old Rooms” (formerly an inn), across

the harbour. It was at Gloucester Lodge that His Majesty received his

ministers, and from whence he and Queen Charlotte used to walk to the

little theatre in Augusta Place to witness the performances of Mrs.

Siddons and her contemporaries. Queen Charlotte’s second keeper of

robes was Fanny Burney (Madame D’Arblay), the chronicler of George

III., and the author of _Evelina_ and _Camilla_, for which last she

received 3,000 guineas, with which sum she built Camilla Cottage, at

Mickleham, near Dorking.

At Weymouth, in 1785, was born Thomas Love Peacock, the author of _The

Monks of St. Mark_, and other works. He was Under-Secretary to Sir

Home Popham, and afterwards Chief Examiner and Clerk to the East India

Company, from which post he retired in 1856 with a pension of £1,333

per annum. He was a friend of Shelley, whom he had met on a walking

tour in Wales in 1812. He died in 1866, aged eighty years.

In the long list of eminent men who have represented the towns in

Parliament we find the names of Francis Bacon (Lord Verulam), Sir

Christopher Wren, and the celebrated political adventurer, Bubb

Dodington.

One of the most interesting studies for the topographer lies in tracing

the origin of the names of the streets of a town; and the names of

the principal streets of Weymouth are distinctly traceable to their

origin. St. Nicholas’ Street derives its name from the patron-saint

of maritime towns; Francis Street comes probably from Franchise; Boot

Lane (formerly Buckler’s), from an inn called “The Boot”; Helen Lane,

from Queen Eleanor, who held the manor of Melcombe; Maiden Street, from

Queen Elizabeth, who united the boroughs; and St. Edmund’s Street, St.

Thomas’ Street, and St. Mary’s Street, possibly from chapels dedicated

in honour of these saints.

[Illustration: The Old Stocks, Weymouth.]

THE ISLE OF PORTLAND

BY MRS. KING WARRY

To the stranger of antiquarian or geological tastes Portland must ever

be of interest; but the casual visitor—seeing it for the first time

in the glare of the noonday sun, amidst eddying clouds of stone-dust

tossed hither and thither by blustering winds, or when the over-charged

atmosphere settles like a misty cap on the Verne Heights—is apt, if

he have formed expectations, to be woefully disappointed. The fact is

that nowhere, perhaps, is the Spirit of Place more coy and difficult

of access than in modern Portland, having retreated before barracks,

fortifications, and prison, before traction-engines and signs of

commercial prosperity. But, properly wooed, it can still be won, and

once found, how well it repays the trouble of seeking! A mere cycle

run or drive through the island is emphatically _not_ the way to see

Portland Isle, especially the Portland of the past. The visitor needs

to walk, saunter, and lounge idly for at least a few days, and then,

if he have a well-stored mind and fail to experience the subtle,

indefinable sensation called “charm,” he must be strangely lacking in

that spiritual perception which alone makes man feel at one with the

universe and with God.

The convict establishment and Government quarries have displaced much

which lent an interest to the island; the barracks and harbour works

have displaced still more—but fortunately we retain a few records

which, scanty though they be, reveal a something of the past. Gone

is the barrow of that king whose very name is lost; and this supposed

last resting-place of a mighty chieftain, swept through long centuries

by pure sea-laden breezes, is now desecrated by quarrying operations:

the barrow of Celtic Bran is but an empty name, though Mound Owl still

remains in part, a silent witness of Saxon prowess and possibly of the

fierceness of the contest maintained so long in Royal Dorset.

Memorials of Old Dorset · 第 12 / 24 段