FOOTNOTES:

[1] From some late examples in our courts of justice, I have thought

it barely possible that this dignified descendant of crowned heads,

at the same time that he is admiring his own person, may be observing

the Counsellor's attention to his lady, and hoping that he shall find

some future opportunity of detecting her infidelity and obtaining

a divorce. But this is merely conjecture. I wish, for the honour

of human nature, that there had been no example to justify such a

suspicion.

[2] The following whimsical imitation of Chaucer was written, I

believe, by Hermes Harris:--

"Right welle my lerned clerkis it is said,

That womanhoode for manne his use was made;

But naughtie manne liketh not one, or soe,

But wisheth aye unthriftilie for mo;

And when by holie church to one he's tied,

Then for his soule he cannot her abide.

Thus when a dogge first lighteth on a bone,

His taile he waggeth,--gladde thereof y-growne;

But if thilke bone untoe his taile thou tie,

Pardie, he fearing it, away doth flie."

[3] Hogarth might intend by this, and the improprieties and

violations of order in the unfinished building seen out of a window,

to hint at the absurdities of the then fashionable architect, William

Kent. As a painter Kent was beneath satire, as an architect he was

above it; but he was protected by Lord Burlington, patronized by Lord

Pembroke, and employed by all who aspired to a character for _virtu_.

Hogarth saw with disgust bordering upon indignation that his taste in

one art, modern gardening (of which he was the acknowledged father),

procured him the reputation of excellence in another, in which he

was grossly ignorant and glaringly erroneous. In some of the grounds

laid out by Kent's directions, he realized that Paradise which Milton

had described; his patrons saw that he could improve nature in their

plantations, and very kindly gave him credit for a power which he

never possessed--that of giving an imitation of nature on his canvas.

By the Dryades his sacrifice had been accepted; but the offering

he laid upon the altar sacred to the fine arts was rejected with

disdain. It was the praise of Hercules that he destroyed monsters and

discomfited giants; it was the praise of William Kent that he cleared

our gardens of their representatives. Before his time the plantations

round the seats of our nobility were a kind of vernal menagerie:

the lion shook his shaggy mane in yew; the dragon waved his wings

in evergreen; and in box, the wild boar displayed his bristled neck

and tusks terrific. Our disciple of true taste cleared away these

fantastic forms, and in their place gave us nature,--"nature to

advantage dressed." But when consulted about interior decorations,

his taste evaporated. The heavy canopy over the nobleman's head, the

ponderous chairs and massy frames which decorate the room, are from

his designs. In some of the old houses of our ancient nobility we see

furniture of a similar appearance, though the greatest part of it,

after passing through the purgatory of a broker's shop, has either

been placed in very inferior situations or consigned to the flames.

Of Kent's abilities as a painter the public thought so highly,

that he was absurdly enough opposed to Sir James Thornhill. This

circumstance might be one source of Hogarth's dislike; he, however,

took an early opportunity of showing it, by what is called a

"Burlesque of Kent's Altarpiece at St. Clement's Church," but which

Hogarth declared to be a fair delineation of the original. A reduced

copy is in vol. iii. of this work; see p. 17 of the 2d edition.

[4] Some of the portraits of Louis XIV. are quite as absurd. We are

told that he once sent to Rome for Poussin, to paint him in the

character of Jupiter. This great artist obeyed the summons, and

prepared his canvas and colours; when, to his extreme astonishment,

the monarch informed him that, although he was to be delineated as

the representative of Jove, etiquette did not permit him to appear

without his major peruke, and he must consequently be so painted.

Poussin, not able to conceive any way of giving appropriate dignity

to the thunderer of Olympus with this flowing appendage, declined

beginning the picture, and returned to Rome without making his

_congé_.

[5] By the loose negligence of her habit, and some circumstances,

I am inclined to think the artist intended to represent her as

pregnant. It has been said that after Baron had finished the plate,

Mr. Hogarth added a lock of hair with Indian ink, but after a few

impressions were taken off, inserted this supplemental ornament with

the graver. In his _Analysis of Beauty_, he makes a remark which

in some degree accounts for the introduction of this fascinating

attraction:--

"It was once the fashion to have two curls of equal size, stuck at

the same height close upon the forehead, which probably took its rise

from seeing the pretty effect of curls falling loosely over the face.

"A lock of hair falling thus across the temples, and by that means

breaking the regularity of the oval, has an effect too alluring to

be strictly decent, as is very well known to the loose and lowest

classes of women; but being paired in so stiff a manner as they

formerly were, they lost the desired effect, and ill deserved the

name of ornaments."

Moralists of different nations have considered hair as calculated to

entangle hearts, and one of our pious writers of the last century

wrote a furious treatise on the _un_loveliness of love-locks.

[6] A chair kicked down, an _Essay on Whist_, cards scattered on the

floor, and the general confusion of everything in the room, seem

to intimate that this _right honourable society_ were actuated by

passions somewhat similar to those which inflame the gentlemen in the

sixth plate of "The Rake's Progress." Though a genuine gamester is

not apt to lose his presence of mind on slight occasions, yet when a

man of rank is stripped of sums that will draw into their vortex many

anticipated years of his revenue, he is liable to lose his temper,

and on such occasions apt to vent his spleen on inanimate objects.

Such things sometimes happen even now.

[7] Absurd as this may seem, yet until Mr. Wedgwood introduced those

beautiful Etruscan forms which now decorate the rooms, and form the

taste of the possessors, these shapeless monsters disgraced the most

splendid apartments in the metropolis.

[8] "Kent was not only consulted for furniture, as frames of

pictures, glasses, tables, chairs, etc., but for plate, for a barge,

for a cradle. So impetuous was fashion, that two great ladies

prevailed on him to make designs for their birthday gowns. The one

he dressed in a petticoat decorated with columns of the five orders;

the other, like a bronze, in copper-coloured satin, with ornaments of

gold."--Walpole's _Anecdotes_, 2d edit., vol. iv. p. 239.

[9] This race still roll round the metropolis; and while some put

their trust in chariots, horses, and impudence, others depend on the

credulity of his Majesty's liege subjects.

Hogarth's Works, with life and anecdotal descriptions of his pictures. Volume 2 (of 3) · 第 134 / 202 题