LITERATURE

The earliest records of the Bohemian or Czech language are very ancient,

though the so-called MSS. of Zelena Hora (Gruneberg) and Kralodvur

(Koniginhof) are almost certainly forgeries of the early part of the

19th century. The earliest genuine documents of the Bohemian language

comprise several hymns and legends; of the latter the legend of St

Catherine and that of St Dorothy have the greatest value. Several

ancient epic fragments have also been preserved, such as the

_Alexandreis_ and _Tandarias a Floribella_. These and other early

Bohemian writings have been printed since the revival of Bohemian

literature in the 19th century. Of considerable historical value is the

rhymed chronicle generally though wrongly known as the chronicle of

Dalimil. The author, who probably lived during the reign of King John

(1310-1346), records the events of Bohemian history from the earliest

period to the reign of King Henry of Carinthia, the immediate

predecessor of John. A strong feeling of racial antipathy to the

Germans pervades the chronicle.

Old Czech literature.

It is undoubtedly to be attributed to the high intellectual level which

Bohemia attained in the 14th century that at that period we already find

writers on religious and philosophical subjects who used the national

language. Of these the most important is Thomas of Stitny (c.

1331-1401). Of his works, which contain many ideas similar to those of

his contemporary Wycliffe, those entitled _O obecnych vecech

Krestanskych_ (on general Christian matters) and _Besedni reci_ (in a

rough translation "learned entertainments") have most value. Stitny and

some of his contemporaries whose Bohemian writings have perished are

known as the forerunners of Huss. Huss, like many of his contemporaries

in Bohemia, wrote both in Bohemian and in Latin. Of the Bohemian

writings of Huss, who contributed greatly to the development of his

native language, the most important is his _Vyklad viry, desatera Boziho

prikazani, a patere_ (exposition of the creed, the ten commandments and

the Lord's Prayer) written in 1412. Of his numerous other Bohemian works

we may mention the _Postilla_ (collection of sermons), the treatises _O

poznani cesty prave k spaseni_ (the true road to salvation) and _O

svatokupectvi_ (on simony), and a large collection of letters; those

written in prison are very touching.

The years that followed the death of Huss formed in Bohemia a period of

incessant theological strife. The anti-Roman or Hussite movement was

largely a democratic one, and it is therefore natural that the national

language rather than Latin should have been used in the writings that

belong to this period. Unfortunately in consequence of the systematic

destruction of all Bohemian writings which took place through the agency

of the Jesuits, after the battle of the White Hill (1620), a large part

of this controversial literature has perished. Thus the writings of the

members of the extreme Hussite party, the so-called Taborites, have been

entirely destroyed. Of the writings of the more moderate Hussites, known

as the Calixtines or Utraquists, some have been preserved. Such are the

books entitled _Of the Great Torment of the Holy Church_ and the _Lives

of the Priests of Tabor_, written in a sense violently hostile to that

community. A Bohemian work by Archbishop John of Rokycan has also been

preserved; it is entitled _Postilla_ and is similar though inferior to

the work of Huss that bears the same name.

A quite independent religious writer who belongs to the period of the

Hussite wars is Peter Chelcicky (born in the last years of the 14th

century, died 1460), who may be called the Tolstoy of the 15th. His

dominant ideas were horror of bloodshed and the determination to accept

unresistingly all, even unjust, decrees of the worldly authorities.

Though a strenuous enemy of the Church of Rome, Chelcicky joined none of

the Hussite parties. His masterpiece is the _Sit viry_ (the net of

faith). Among his other works his _Postilla_ and polemical writings in

the form of letters to Archbishop John of Rokycan and Bishop Nicolas of

Pelhrimov deserve mention.

The Hussite period is rather poor in historical works written in the

language of the country. We should, however, mention some chroniclers

who were contemporaries and sometimes eye-witnesses of the events of the

Hussite wars. Their writings have been collected and published by

Frantisek Palacky under the title of _Stare ceske letopisy_.

In the 16th century when Bohemia was in a state of comparative

tranquillity, the native literature was largely developed. Besides the

writers of the community of the Bohemian Brethren, we meet at this

period with three historians of merit. Of these far the best-known is

Wenceslas Hajek of Libocan. The year of his birth is uncertain, but we

read of him as a priest in 1524; he died in 1553. His great work

_Kronika ceska_ was dedicated to the emperor Ferdinand I., king of

Bohemia, and appeared under the auspices of government officials. It has

therefore a strong dynastic and Romanist tendency, and its circulation

was permitted even at the time when most Bohemian books were prohibited

and many totally destroyed. Hajek's book was translated into several

languages and frequently quoted. We find such second-hand quotations

even in the works of many writers who had probably never heard of Hajek.

His book is, however, inaccurate and grossly partial. Very little known

on the other hand are the works of Bartos, surnamed "pisar" (the

writer), as he was for many years employed as secretary by the city of

Prague, and those of Sixt of Ottersdorf. The work of Bartos (or

Bartholomew) entitled the _Chronicle of Prague_ has great historical

value. He describes the troubles that befell Prague and Bohemia

generally during the reign of the weak and absentee sovereign King

Louis. The year of the birth of Bartos is uncertain, but it is known

that he died in 1539. The somewhat later work of Sixt of Ottersdorf

(1500-1583) deals with a short but very important episode in the history

of Bohemia. It is entitled _Memorials of the Troubled Years 1546 and

1547_. The book describes the unsuccessful rising of the Bohemians

against Ferdinand I. of Austria. Sixt took a considerable part in this

movement, a fact that greatly enhances the value of his book.

Though the life of Chelcicky, who has already been mentioned, was an

isolated one, he is undoubtedly the indirect founder of the community of

the "Bohemian Brethren," who greatly influenced Bohemian literature.

Almost all their historical and theological works were written in the

national language, which through their influence became far more refined

and polished. Before referring to some of the writings of members of the

community we should mention the famed translation of the Scriptures

known as the _Bible of Kralice_. It was the joint work of several

divines of the brotherhood, and was first printed at Kralice in Moravia

in 1593. Brother Gregory, surnamed the patriarch of the brotherhood, has

left a large number of writings dealing mainly with theological matters.

Most important are the _Letters to Archbishop Rokycan_ and the book _On

good and evil priests_. After the death of Brother Gregory in 1480

discord broke out in the community, and it resulted in very great

literary activity. Brothers Lucas, Blahoslav and Jaffet, as well as

Augusta, a bishop of the community, have left us numerous controversial

works. Very interesting is the account of the captivity of Bishop

Augusta, written by his companion the young priest Jan Bilek. We have

evidence that numerous historical works written by members of the

brotherhood existed, but most of them perished in the 17th century when

nearly all anti-Roman books written in Bohemia were destroyed. Thus only

fragments of Blahoslav's _History of the Unity_ (i.e. the brotherhood)

have been preserved. One of the historians of the brotherhood, Wenceslas

Brezan, wrote a _History of the House of Rosenberg_, of which only the

biographies of William and Peter of Rosenberg have been preserved. The

greatest writer of the brotherhood is John Amos Komensky or Comenius

(1592-1670). Of his many works written in his native language the most

important is his _Labyrinth of the World_, an allegorical tale which is

perhaps the most famous work written in Bohemian.[4] Many of the

numerous devotional and educational writings of Comenius,--his works

number 142,--are also written in his native tongue.

The year 1620, which witnessed the downfall of Bohemian independence,

also marks the beginning of a period of decline of the national tongue,

which indeed later, in the 18th century, was almost extinct as a written

language. Yet we must notice besides Comenius two other writers, both

historians, whose works belong to a date later than 1620. Of these one

was an adherent of the nationalist, the other of the imperialist party.

Paul Skala ze Zhore (1582-c. 1640) was an official in the service of the

"winter king" Frederick of the Palatinate. He for a time followed his

sovereign into exile, and spent the last years of his life at Freiberg

in Saxony. It was at this period of his life, after his political

activity had ceased, that he wrote his historical works. His first work

was a short book which is a mere series of chronological tables.

Somewhat later he undertook a vast work entitled _Histoire cirkevni_

(history of the church). In spite of its title the book, which consists

of ten enormous MS. volumes, deals as much with political as with

ecclesiastical matters. The most valuable part, that dealing with events

of 1602 to 1623, of which Skala writes as a contemporary and often as an

eye-witness, has been edited and published by Prof. Tieftrunk. A

contemporary and a political opponent of Skala was William Count Slavata

(1572-1652). He was a faithful servant of the house of Habsburg, and one

of the government officials who were thrown from the windows of the

Hradcany palace in 1618, at the beginning of the Bohemian uprising. In

1637 Slavata published his _Pamety_ (memoirs) which deal exclusively

with the events of the years 1618 and 1619, in which he had played so

great a part. During the leisure of the last years of his long life

Slavata composed a vast work entitled _Historicke Spisovani_ (historical

works). It consists of fourteen large MS. volumes, two of which contain

the previously-written memoirs. These two volumes have recently been

edited and published by Dr Jos. Jirecek.

19th-century revival.

After the deaths of Skala, Slavata and Comenius, no works of any

importance were written in the Bohemian language for a considerable

period, and the new Austrian government endeavoured in every way to

discourage the use of that language. A change took place when the

romantic movement started at the beginning of the 19th century. The

early revival of the Bohemian language was very modest, and at first

almost exclusively translations from foreign languages were published.

The first writer who again drew attention to the then almost forgotten

Bohemian language was Joseph Dobrovsky (1753-1829). His works, which

include a grammar of the Bohemian language and a history of Bohemian

literature, were mostly written in German or Latin, and his only

Bohemian works are some essays which he contributed to the early numbers

of the _Casopis Musea Kralovstvi Ceskeho_ (Journal of the Bohemian

Museum) and a collection of letters.

It is, however, to four men belonging to a time somewhat subsequent to

that of Dobrovsky that the revival of the language and literature of

Bohemia is mainly due. They are Jungmann, Kolar, Safarik and Palacky.

Joseph Jungmann (1773-1847) published early in life numerous Bohemian

translations of German and English writers. His most important works are

his _Dejepes literatury ceska_ (history of Bohemian literature), and his

monumental German and Bohemian dictionary, which largely contributed to

the development of the Bohemian language. John Kolar (1793-1852) was the

greatest poet of the Bohemian revival, and it is only in quite recent

days that Bohemian poetry has risen to a higher level. Kolar's principal

poem is the _Slavy dcera_ (daughter of Slavia), a personification of the

Slavic race. Its principal importance at the present time consists

rather in the part it played in the revival of Bohemian literature than

in its artistic value. Kolar's other works are mostly philological

studies. Paul Joseph Safarik (1795-1861) was a very fruitful writer. His

_Starozitnosti Slovanske_ (Slavic antiquities), an attempt to record the

then almost unknown history and literature of the early Slavs, has still

considerable value. Francis Palacky (1798-1876) is undoubtedly the

greatest of Bohemian historians. Among his many works his history of

Bohemia from the earliest period to the year 1526 is the most important.

Other Bohemian writers whose work belongs mainly to the earlier part of

the 19th century are the poets Francis Ladislav Celakovsky, author of

the _Ruze stolistova_ (the hundred-leaved rose), Erben, Macha, Tyl, to

mention but a few of the most famous writers. The talented writer Karel

Havlicek, the founder of Bohemian journalism, deserves special notice.

During the latter part of the 19th century, and particularly after the

foundation of the national university in 1882, Bohemian literature has

developed to an extent that few perhaps foresaw. Of older writers Bozena

Nemceva, whose _Babicka_ has been translated into many languages, and

Benes Trebizky, author of many historical novels, should be named. John

Neruda (1834-1891) was a very fruitful and talented writer both of

poetry and of prose. Perhaps the most valuable of his many works is his

philosophical epic entitled _Kosmicke basne_ (cosmic poems). Julius

Zeyer (1841-1901) also wrote much both in prose and in verse. His epic

poem entitled _Vysehrad_, which celebrates the ancient glory of the

acropolis of Prague, has great value, and of his many novels _Jan Maria

Plojhar_ has had the greatest success. Of later Bohemian poets the best

are Adolf Heyduk, Svatopluk Cech and Jaroslav Vrchlicky (b. 1853). Of

Svatopluk Cech's many poems, which are all inspired by national

enthusiasm, _Vaclav z Michalovic, Lesetinsky Kovar_ (the smith of

Lesetin) and _Basne otroka_ (the songs of a slave) are the most notable.

While Vrchlicky (pseudonym of Emil Frida) has no less strong patriotic

feelings, he has been more catholic in the choice of the subjects of his

many works, both in poetry and in prose. Of his many collections of

lyric poems _Rok na jihu_ (a year in the south), _Poute k Eldoradu_

(pilgrimages to Eldorado) and _Sonety Samotare_ (sonnets of a recluse)

have particular value. Vrchlicky is also a very brilliant dramatist.

Bohemian novelists have become very numerous. Mention should be made of

Alois Jirasek, also a distinguished dramatic author; Jacob Arbes, whose

_Romanetta_ have great merit; and Vaclav Hladik, whose _Evzen Voldan_ is

a very striking representation of the life of modern Prague. Like so

many Bohemian authors, Hladik also is a copious dramatic author.

Bohemia has been very fruitful in historic writers. Wenceslas Tomek

(1818-1905) left many historical works, of which his _Dejepis miesta

Prahy_ (history of the town of Prague) is the most important. Jaroslav

Goll (b. 1846) is the author of many historical works, especially on the

community of the Bohemian Brethren. Professor Joseph Kalousek has

written much on the early history of Bohemia, and is also the author of

a very valuable study of the ancient constitution (_Statni pravo_) of

Bohemia. Dr Anton Rezek is the author of important historical studies,

many of which appeared in the Journal of the Bohemian Museum and in the

_Cesky Casopis Historicky_ (Bohemian Historical Review), which he

founded in 1895 jointly with Professor Jaroslav Goll. More recently Dr

Vaclav Flajshans has published some excellent studies on the life and

writings of John Huss, and Professors Pic and Niederle have published

learned archaeological studies on the earliest period of Bohemian

history.

See Count Lutzow, _A History of Bohemian Literature_ (London, 1899);

W.R. Morfill, _Slavonic Literature_ (1883); A.N. Pypin and V.D.

Spasovic, _History of Slavonic Literature_ (written in Russian,

translated into German by Trangott Pech, _Gesch. der slav.

Literaturen_, 2 vols., Leipzig, 1880-1884). There are modern histories

of Bohemian literature written in the national language by Dr Karel

Tieftrunk, Dr Vaclav Flajshans and Mr Jaroslav Vlaek. (L.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Bohemia" to "Borgia, Francis" Volume 4, Slice 2 · 第 11 / 57 题