INTRODUCTION

The first reading of the Letters to the Clerical Society to which they

were first addressed in September 1879, twenty-three clergy being

present, was prefaced with the following remarks:--

A few words by way of introduction will be absolutely necessary

before I proceed to read Mr. Ruskin's letters. They originated

simply in a proposal of mine, which met with so ready and willing a

response, that it almost seemed like a simultaneous thought. They

are addressed nominally to myself, as representing the body of

clergy whose secretary I have the honour to be; they are, in fact,

therefore addressed to this Society primarily. But in the course of

the next month or two they will also be read to two other Clerical

Societies,--the Ormskirk and the Brighton (junior),--who have

acceded to my proposals with much kindness, and in the first case

have invited me of their own accord. I have undertaken, to the best

of my ability, to arrange and set down the various expressions of

opinion, which will be freely uttered. In so limited a time, many

who may have much to say that would be really valuable will find no

time to-day to deliver it. Of these brethren, I beg that they will

do me the favour to express their views at their leisure, in

writing. The original letters, the discussions, the letters which

may be suggested, and a few comments of the Editor's, will be

published in a volume which will appear, I trust, in the beginning

of the next year.

I will now, if you please, undertake the somewhat dangerous

responsibility of avowing my own impressions of the letters I am

about to read to you. I own that I believe I see in these papers

the development of a principle of the deepest interest and

importance,--namely, the application of the highest standard in the

interpretation of the Gospel message _to_ ourselves as clergymen,

and _from_ ourselves to our congregations. We have plenty elsewhere

of doctrine and dogma, and undefinable shades of theological

opinion. Let us turn at last to practical questions presented for

our consideration by an eminent layman whose field of work lies

quite as much in religion and ethics, as it does, reaching to so

splendid an eminence, in Art. A man is wanted to show to both

clergy and laity something of the full force and meaning of Gospel

teaching. Many there are, and I am of this number, whose cry is

"_Exoriare aliquis_."

I ask you, if possible, to do in an hour what I have been for the

last two months trying to do, to divest myself of old forms of

thought, to cast off self-indulgent views of our duty as ministers

of religion, to lift ourselves out of those grooves in which we are

apt to run so smoothly and so complacently, persuading ourselves

that all is well just as it is, and to endeavour to strike into a

sterner, harder path, beset with difficulties, but still the path

of duty. These papers will demand a close, a patient, and in some

places, a few will think, an indulgent consideration; but as a

whole, the standard taken is, as I firmly believe, speaking only

for myself, lofty and Christian to the extent of an almost ideal

perfection. If we do go forward straight in the direction which Mr.

Ruskin points out, I know we shall come, sooner or later, to a

chasm right across our path. Some of us, I hope, will undauntedly

cross it. Let each judge for himself, [Greek: to telei pistin

pheron].

Letters to the Clergy on the Lord's Prayer and the Church · 第 6 / 95 题