DAVID'S CRY FOR PARDON

'... Blot out my transgressions. 2. Wash me throughly from mine

iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin.'--PSALM li. 1, 2.

A whole year had elapsed between David's crime and David's penitence. It

had been a year of guilty satisfaction not worth the having; of sullen

hardening of heart against God and all His appeals. The thirty-second

Psalm tells us how _happy_ David had been during that twelvemonth, of

which he says, 'My bones waxed old through my roaring all the day long.

For day and night Thy hand was heavy on me.' Then came Nathan with his

apologue, and with that dark threatening that 'the sword should never

depart from his house,' the fulfilment of which became a well-head of

sorrow to the king for the rest of his days, and gave a yet deeper

poignancy of anguish to the crime of his spoiled favourite Absalom. The

stern words had their effect. The frost that had bound his soul melted

all away, and he confessed his sin, and was forgiven then and there. 'I

have sinned against the Lord' is the confession as recorded in the

historical books; and, says Nathan, 'The Lord hath made to pass from

thee the iniquity of thy sin.' Immediately, as would appear from the

narrative, that very same day, the child of Bathsheba and David was

smitten with fatal disease, and died in a week. And it is _after_ all

these events--the threatening, the penitence, the pardon, the

punishment--that he comes to God, who had so freely forgiven, and

likewise so sorely smitten him, and wails out these prayers: 'Blot out

my transgressions, wash me from mine iniquity, cleanse me from my sin.'

One almost shrinks from taking as the text of a sermon words like these,

in which a broken and contrite spirit groans for deliverance, and which

are, besides, hallowed by the thought of the thousands who have since

found them the best expression of their sacredest emotions. But I would

fain try not to lose the feeling that breathes through the words, while

seeking for the thoughts which are in them, and hope that the light

which they throw upon the solemn subjects of guilt and forgiveness may

not be for any of us a mere cold light.

I. Looking then at this triad of petitions, they teach us first how

David thought of his sin.

You will observe the reiteration of the same earnest cry in all these

clauses, and if you glance over the remainder of this psalm, you will

find that he asks for the gifts of God's Spirit, with a similar

threefold repetition. Now this characteristic of the whole psalm is

worth notice in the outset. It is not a mere piece of Hebrew

parallelism. The requirements of poetical form but partially explain it.

It is much more the earnestness of a soul that cannot be content with

once asking for the blessings and then passing on, but dwells upon them

with repeated supplication, not because it thinks that it shall be heard

for its 'much speaking,' but because it longs for them so eagerly.

And besides that, though the three clauses do express the same general

idea, they express it under various modifications, and must be all taken

together before we get the whole of the Psalmist's thought of sin.

Notice again that he speaks of his evil as 'transgressions' and as

'sin,' first using the plural and then the singular. He regards it first

as being broken up into a multitude of isolated acts, and then as being

all gathered together into one knot, as it were, so that it is one

thing. In one aspect it is 'my transgressions'--'that thing that I did

about Uriah, that thing that I did about Bathsheba, those other things

that these dragged after them.' One by one the acts of wrongdoing pass

before him. But he does not stop there. They are not merely a number of

deeds, but they have, deep down below, a common root from which they all

came--a centre in which they all inhere. And so he says, not only 'Blot

out my _transgressions_,' but 'Wash me from mine _iniquity_.' He does

not merely generalise, but he sees and he feels what you and I have to

feel, if we judge rightly of our evil actions, that we cannot take them

only in their plurality as so many separate deeds, but that we must

recognise them as coming from a common source, and we must lament before

God not only our 'sins' but our 'sin'--not only the outward acts of

transgression, but that alienation of heart from which they all come;

not only sin in its manifold manifestations as it comes out in the life,

but in its inward roots as it coils round our hearts. You are not to

confess acts alone, but let your contrition embrace the principle from

which they come.

Further, in all the petitions we see that the idea of his own single

responsibility for the whole thing is uppermost in David's mind. It is

_my_ transgression, it is _mine_ iniquity, and _my_ sin. He has not

learned to say with Adam of old, and with some so-called wise thinkers

to-day: 'I was tempted, and I could not help it.' He does not talk about

'circumstances,' and say that they share the blame with him. He takes it

all to himself. 'It was _I_ did it. True, I was tempted, but it was my

soul that made the occasion a temptation. True, the circumstances led me

astray, but they would not have led me astray if I had been right, and

_where_ as well as _what_ I ought to be.' It is a solemn moment when

that thought first rises in its revealing power to throw light into the

dark places of our souls. But it is likewise a blessed moment, and

without it we are scarcely aware of ourselves. Conscience quickens

consciousness. The sense of transgression is the first thing that gives

to many a man the full sense of his own individuality. There is nothing

that makes us feel how awful and incommunicable is that mysterious

personality by which every one of us lives alone after all

companionship, so much as the contemplation of our relations to God's

law. 'Every man shall bear his own burden.' 'Circumstances,' yes;

'bodily organisation,' yes; 'temperament,' yes; 'the maxims of society,'

'the conventionalities of the time,' yes,--all these things have

something to do with shaping our single deeds and with influencing our

character; but after we have made all allowances for these influences

which affect _me_, let us ask the philosophers who bring them forward as

diminishing or perhaps annihilating responsibility, 'And what about that

_me_ which these things influence?' After all, let me remember that the

deed is _mine_, and that every one of us shall, as Paul puts it, give

account of _himself_ unto God.

Passing from that, let me point for one moment to another set of ideas

that are involved in these petitions. The three words which the Psalmist

employs for sin give prominence to different aspects of it.

'Transgression' is not the same as 'iniquity,' and 'iniquity' is not the

same as 'sin.' They are not aimless, useless synonyms, but they have

each a separate thought in them. The word rendered 'transgression'

literally means rebellion, a breaking away from and setting oneself

against lawful authority. That translated 'iniquity' literally means

that which is twisted, bent. The word in the original for 'sin'

literally means missing a mark, an aim. And this threefold view of sin

is no discovery of David's, but is the lesson which the whole Old

Testament system had laboured to print deep on the national

consciousness. That lesson, taught by law and ceremonial, by

denunciation and remonstrance, by chastisement and deliverance, the

penitent king has learned. To all men's wrongdoings these descriptions

apply, but most of all to his. Sin is ever, and his sin especially is,

rebellion, the deflection of the life from the straight line which God's

law draws so clearly and firmly, and hence a missing the aim.

Think how profound and living is the consciousness of sin which lies in

calling it _rebellion_. It is not merely, then, that we go against some

abstract propriety, or break some impersonal law of nature when we do

wrong, but that we rebel against a rightful Sovereign. In a special

sense this was true of the Jew, whose nation stood under the government

of a divine king, so that sin was treason, and breaches of the law acts

of rebellion against God. But it is as true of us all. Our theory of

morals will be miserably defective, and our practice will be still more

defective, unless we have learned that morality is but the garment of

religion, that the definition of virtue is obedience to God, and that

the true sin in sin is not the yielding to impulses that belong to our

nature, but the assertion in the act of yielding, of our independence of

God and of our opposition to His will. And all this has application to

David's sin. He was God's viceroy and representative, and he sets to his

people the example of revolt, and lifts the standard of rebellion. It is

as if the ruler of a province declared war against the central authority

of which he was the creature, and used against it the very magazines and

weapons with which it had intrusted him. He had rebelled, and in an

eminent degree, as Nathan said to him, given to the enemies of God

occasion to blaspheme.

Not less profound and suggestive is that other name for sin, that which

is twisted, or bent, mine 'iniquity.' It is the same metaphor which lies

in our own word 'wrong,' that which is wrung or warped from the straight

line of right. To that line, drawn by God's law, our lives should run

parallel, bending neither to the right hand nor to the left. But instead

of the firm directness of such a line, our lives show wavering

deformity, and are like the tremulous strokes in a child's copy-book.

David had the pattern before him, and by its side his unsteady purpose,

his passionate lust, had traced this wretched scrawl. The path on which

he should have trodden was a straight course to God, unbending like one

of these conquering Roman roads, that will turn aside for neither

mountain nor ravine, nor stream nor bog. If it had been thus straight,

it would have reached its goal. Journeying on that way of holiness, he

would have found, and we shall find, that on it no ravenous beast shall

meet us, but with songs and everlasting joy upon their lips the happy

pilgrims draw ever nearer to God, obtaining joy and gladness in all the

march, until at last 'sorrow and sighing shall flee away.' But instead

of this he had made for himself a crooked path, and had lost his road

and his peace in the mazes of wandering ways. 'The labour of the foolish

wearieth every one of them, because he knoweth not how to come to the

city.'

Another very solemn and terrible thought of what sin is, lies in that

final word for it, which means 'missing an aim.' How strikingly that

puts a truth which siren voices are constantly trying to sing us out of

believing! Every sin is a blunder as well as a crime. And that for two

reasons, because, first, God has made us for Himself, and to take

anything besides for our life's end or our heart's portion is to divert

ourselves from our true destiny; and because, second, that being so,

every attempt to win satisfaction or delight by such a course is and

must be a failure. Sin misses the aim if we think of our proper

destination. Sin misses its own aim of happiness. A man never gets what

he hoped for by doing wrong, or, if he seem to do so, he gets something

more that spoils it all. He pursues after the fleeing form that seems so

fair, and when he reaches her side, and lifts her veil, eager to embrace

the tempter, a hideous skeleton grins and gibbers at him. The siren

voices sing to you from the smiling island, and their white arms and

golden harps and the flowery grass draw you from the wet boat and the

weary oar; but when a man lands he sees the fair form end in a slimy

fish, and she slays him and gnaws his bones. 'He knows not that the dead

are there, and that her guests are in the depths of hell.' Yes! every

sin is a mistake, and the epitaph for the sinner is 'Thou fool!'

II. These petitions also show us, in the second place, How David thinks

of forgiveness.

As the words for sin expressed a threefold view of the burden from which

the Psalmist seeks deliverance, so the triple prayer, in like manner,

sets forth that blessing under three aspects. It is not merely pardon

for which he asks. He is making no sharp dogmatic distinction between

forgiveness and cleansing.

The two things run into each other in his prayer, as they do, thank God!

in our own experience, the one being inseparable, in fact, from the

other. It is absolute deliverance from the power of sin, in all forms of

that power, whether as guilt or as habit, for which he cries so

piteously; and his accumulative petitions are so exhaustive, not because

he is coldly examining his sin, but because he is intensely feeling the

manifold burden of his great evil.

That first petition conceives of the divine dealing with sin as being

the erasure of a writing, perhaps of an indictment. There is a special

significance in the use of the word here, because it is also employed in

the description of the Levitical ceremonial of the ordeal, where a curse

was written on a scroll and blotted out by the priest. But apart from

that the metaphor is a natural and suggestive one. Our sin stands

written against us. The long gloomy indictment has been penned by our

own hands. Our past is a blurred manuscript, full of false things and

bad things. We have to spread the writing before God, and ask Him to

remove the stained characters from its surface, that once was fair and

unsoiled.

Ah, brethren! some people tell us that the past is irrevocable, that the

thing once done can never be undone, that the life's diary written by

our own hands can never be cancelled. The melancholy theory of some

thinkers and teachers is summed up in the words, infinitely sad and

despairing when so used, 'What I have written I have written.' Thank

God! we know better than that. We know who blots out the handwriting

'that is against us, nailing it to His Cross.' We know that of God's

great mercy our future may 'copy fair our past,' and the past may be all

obliterated and removed. And as sometimes you will find in an old

monkish library the fair vellum that once bore lascivious stories of

ancient heathens and pagan deities turned into the manuscript in which a

saint has penned his Contemplations, an Augustine his Confessions, or a

Jerome his Translations, so our souls may become palimpsests. The old

wicked heathen characters that we have traced there may be blotted out,

and covered over by the writing of that divine Spirit who has said, 'I

will put My laws into their minds, and write them in their hearts.' As

you run your pen through the finished pages of your last year's diaries,

as you seal them up and pack them away, and begin a new page in a clean

book on the first of January, so it is possible for every one of us to

do with our lives. Notwithstanding all the influence of habit,

notwithstanding all the obstinacy of long-indulged modes of thought and

action, notwithstanding all the depressing effect of frequent attempts

and frequent failures, we may break ourselves off from all that is

sinful in our past lives, and begin afresh, saying, 'God helping me! I

will write another sort of biography for myself for the days that are to

come.'

We cannot erase these sad records from our past. The ink is indelible;

and besides all that we have visibly written in these terrible

autobiographies of ours, there is much that has sunk into the page,

there is many a 'secret fault,' the record of which will need the fire

of that last day to make it legible, Alas for those who learn the black

story of their own lives for the first time then! Learn it now, my

brother! and learn likewise that Christ can wipe it all clean off the

page, clean out of your nature, clean out of God's book. Cry to Him,

with the Psalmist, 'Blot out my transgressions!' and He will calm and

bless you with the ancient answer, 'I have blotted out as a thick cloud

thy transgressions, and as a cloud thy sins.'

Then there is another idea in the second of these prayers for

forgiveness: '_Wash me throughly_ from mine iniquity.' That phrase does

not need any explanation, except that the word expresses the antique way

of cleansing garments by treading and beating. David, then, here uses

the familiar symbol of a robe, to express the 'habit' of the soul, or,

as we say, the character. That robe is all splashed and stained. He

cries to God to make it a robe of righteousness and a garment of purity.

And mark that he thinks the method by which this will be accomplished is

a protracted and probably a painful one. He is not praying for a mere

declaration of pardon, he is not asking only for the one complete,

instantaneous act of forgiveness, but he is asking for a process of

purifying which will be long and hard. 'I am ready,' says he, in effect,

'to submit to any sort of discipline, if only I may be clean. Wash me,

beat me, tread me down, hammer me with mallets, dash me against stones,

rub me with smarting soap and caustic nitre--do anything, anything with

me, if only those foul spots melt away from the texture of my soul!' A

solemn prayer, my brethren! if we pray it aright, which will be answered

by many a sharp application of God's Spirit, by many a sorrow, by much

very painful work, both within our own souls and in our outward lives,

but which will be fulfilled at last in our being clothed like our Lord,

in garments which shine as the light.

We know, dear brethren! who has said, 'I counsel thee to buy of Me white

raiment, that the shame of thy nakedness may not appear.' And we know

well who were the great company before the throne of God, that had

'washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.'

'Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though

they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.' 'Wash me throughly

from mine iniquity.'

The deliverance from sin is still further expressed by that third

supplication, 'Cleanse me from my sin.' That is the technical word for

the priestly act of declaring ceremonial cleanness--the cessation of

ceremonial pollution, and for the other priestly act of making, as well

as declaring, clean from the stains of leprosy. And with allusion to

both of these uses, the Psalmist employs it here. That is to say, he

thinks of his guilt not only as a blotted past record which he has

written, not only as a garment spotted by the flesh which his spirit

wears, but he thinks of it too as inhering in himself, as a leprosy and

disease of his own personal nature. He thinks of it as being, like that,

incurable, fatal, twin sister to and precursor of death; and he thinks

of it as capable of being cleansed only by a sacerdotal act, only by the

great High Priest and by His finger being laid upon it. And we know who

it was that--when the leper, whom no man in Israel was allowed to touch

on pain of uncleanness, came to His feet--put out His hand in triumphant

consciousness of power, and touched him, and said, 'I _will_! be thou

clean.' Let this be thy prayer, 'Cleanse me from my sin'; and Christ

will answer, 'Thy leprosy hath departed from thee.'

III. These petitions likewise show us whence the Psalmist draws his

confidence for such a prayer.

'According to the multitude of Thy tender mercies, blot out my

transgressions.' His whole hope rests upon God's own character, as

revealed in the endless continuance of His acts of love. He knows the

number and the greatness of his sins, and the very depth of his

consciousness of sin helps him to a corresponding greatness in his

apprehension of God's mercy. As he says in another of his psalms,

'Innumerable evils have compassed me about; they are more than the hairs

of my head.... Many, O Lord my God! are Thy wonderful works.... They are

more than can be numbered.' This is the blessedness of all true

penitence, that the more profoundly it feels its own sore need and great

sinfulness, in that very proportion does it recognise the yet greater

mercy and all-sufficient grace of our loving God, and from the lowest

depths beholds the stars in the sky, which they who dwell amid the

surface-brightness of the noonday cannot discern.

God's own revealed character, His faithfulness and persistency,

notwithstanding all our sins, in that mode of dealing with men which has

blessed all generations with His tender mercies--these were David's

pleas. And for us who have the perfect love of God perfectly expressed

in His Son, that same plea is incalculably strengthened, for we can say,

'According to Thy tender mercy in Thy dear Son, for the sake of Christ,

blot out my transgressions.' Is the depth of our desire, and is the

firmness of our confidence, proportioned to the increased clearness of

our knowledge of the love of our God? Does the Cross of Christ lead us

to as trustful a penitence as David had, to whom meditation on God's

providences and the shadows of the ancient covenant were chiefest

teachers of the multitude of His tender mercies?

Remember further that a comparison of the narrative in the historical

books seems to show, as I said, that this psalm followed Nathan's

declaration of the divine forgiveness, and that therefore these

petitions of our text are the echo and response to that declaration.

Thus we see that the revelation of God's love precedes, and is the cause

of, the truest penitence; that our prayer for forgiveness is properly

the appropriating, or the effort to appropriate, the divine promise of

forgiveness; and that the assurance of pardon, so far from making a man

think lightly of his sin, is the thing that drives it home to his

conscience, and first of all teaches him what it really is. As long as

you are tortured with thoughts of a possible hell because of guilt, as

long as you are troubled by the contemplation of consequences affecting

your happiness as ensuing upon your wrongdoing, so long there is a

foreign and disturbing element in even your deepest and truest

penitence. But when you know that God has forgiven--when you come to see

the 'multitude of Thy tender mercies,' when the fear of punishment has

passed out of your apprehension, then you are left with a heart at

leisure from dread, to look the fact and not the consequences in the

face, and to think of the moral nature, and not of the personal results,

of your sin. And so one of the old prophets, with profound truth, says,

'Thou shalt be ashamed and confounded, and never open thy mouth any more

because of thy sin, when I am pacified towards thee for all thou hast

done.'

Dear friends! the wheels of God's great mill may grind us small, without

our coming to know or to hate our sin. About His chastisements, about

the revelation of His wrath, that old saying is true to a great extent:

'If you bray a fool in a mortar, his folly will not depart from him.'

You may smite a man down, crush him, make his bones to creep with the

preaching of vengeance and of hell, and the result of it will often be,

if it be anything at all, what it was in the case of that poor wretched

Judas, who, because he only saw wrath, flung _himself_ into despair, and

was lost, not because he had betrayed Christ, but because he believed

that there was no forgiveness for the man that had betrayed.

But Love comes, and 'Love is Lord of all.' God's assurance, 'I have

forgiven,' the assurance that we do not need to plead with Him, to bribe

Him, to buy pardon by tears and amendment, but that it is already

provided for us--the blessed vision of an all-mighty love treasured in a

dying Saviour, the proclamation 'God was in Christ, reconciling the

world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them'--Oh! these

are the powers that break, or rather that melt, our hearts; these are

the keen weapons that wound to heal our hearts; these are the teachers

that teach a 'godly sorrow that needeth not to be repented of.' Think of

all the patient, pitying mercy of our Father, with which He has lingered

about our lives, and softly knocked at the door of our hearts! Think of

that unspeakable gift in which are wrapped up all His tender

mercies--the gift of Christ who died for us all! Let it smite upon your

heart with a rebuke mightier than all the thunders of law or terrors of

judgment. Let it unveil for you not only the depths of the love of God,

but the darkness of your own selfish rebellion from Him. Measure your

crooked lives by the perfect rightness of Christ's. Learn how you have

missed the aim which He reached, who could say, 'I delight to do Thy

will, O my God!' And let that same infinite love that teaches sin

announce frank forgiveness and prophesy perfect purity. Then, with heart

fixed upon Christ's Cross, let your cry for pardon be the echo of the

most sure promise of pardon which sounds from His dying lips; and as you

gaze on Him who died that we might be freed from all iniquity, ask Him

to blot out your transgressions, to wash you throughly from your

iniquity, and to cleanse you from your sins. Ask, for you cannot ask in

vain; ask earnestly, for you need it sorely; ask confidently, for He has

promised before you ask; but ask, for unless you do, you will not

receive. Ask, and the answer is sent already--'The blood of Jesus Christ

cleanseth from all sin.'

Expositions of Holy Scripture: Psalms · 第 156 / 257 题