CHAPTER VI

Sea punishments—The cat—Flogging at the gangway—Flogging through

the fleet—Running the gauntlet—Keel-hauling—Hanging

The punishment most in use in the fleet was flogging on the bare

back with the cat-o’-nine-tails. The cat was a short, wooden stick,

covered with red baize. The tails were of tough knotted cord, about

two feet long. The thieves’ cat, with which thieves were flogged, had

longer and heavier tails, knotted throughout their length. Flogging

was inflicted at the discretion of the captain. It was considered

the only punishment likely to be effective with such men as manned

the royal ships. It is now pretty certain that it was as useless as

it was degrading. Lord Charles Beresford has said that, “in those

days we had the cat and no discipline; now we have discipline and

no cat.” Another skilled observer has said that “it made a bad

man worse, and broke a good man’s heart.” It was perhaps the most

cruel and ineffectual punishment ever inflicted. The system was

radically bad, for many captains inflicted flogging for all manner of

offences, without distinction. The thief was flogged, the drunkard

was flogged, the laggard was flogged. The poor, wretched topman who

got a rope-yarn into a buntline block was flogged. The very slightest

transgression was visited with flogging. Those seamen who had any

pride remaining in them went in daily fear of being flogged. Those

who had been flogged were generally callous, careless whether they

were flogged again, and indifferent to all that might happen to

them. It was a terrible weapon in the hands of the officers. In many

cases the officers abused the power, by the infliction of excessive

punishment for trifling offences. The sailors liked a smart captain.

They liked to be brought up to the mark, and if a captain showed

himself a brave man, a good seaman, and a glutton for hard knocks,

they would stand any punishment he chose to inflict, knowing that

such a one would not be unjust. They hated a slack captain, for a

slack captain left them at the mercy of the underlings, and that,

they said, was “hell afloat.” But worse than anything they hated

a tyrant, a man who flogged his whole ship’s company for little

or no reason, or for the infringement of his own arbitrary rules.

Such a man, who kept his crew in an agony of fear, hardly knowing

whether to kill themselves or their tyrant, was dreaded by all. He

was not uncommon in the service until the conclusion of the Great

War. It was his kind who drove so many of our men into the American

navy. It was his kind who did so much to cause the mutinies at the

Nore and Spithead, the loss of the _Hermione_ frigate, and (to some

extent) the losses we sustained in the American War. Lastly, it

was his kind who caused so many men to desert, in defiance of the

stern laws against desertion. That kind of captain was the terror

of the fleet. We do not know what percentage of captains gave the

lash unmercifully. Jack Nastyface tells us that of the nine ships of

the line he sailed aboard only two had humane commanders. These two

received services of plate from the sailors under their command at

the paying-off of their ships; the other seven, we are to presume,

ranged from the severe to the brutal.

After all, the cat was not essential to discipline. This was proved

time and time again while it was most in use. There were, of course,

stubborn, brutal, and mutinous sailors. A fleet so manned could not

lack such men. When such men were brought before Lord Nelson, he

would say: “Send them to Collingwood. He will tame them, if no one

else can.” Lord Collingwood was the man who swore, by the god of war,

that his men should salute a reefer’s coat, even when it were merely

hung to dry. Yet he didn’t tame his men by cutting their backs into

strips. He would have his whole ship’s company in perfect order,

working like machines, with absolute, unquestioning fidelity. But he

seldom flogged more than one man a month, and punished really serious

offences, such as drunkenness, inciting to mutiny, and theft, with

six, nine, or at most a dozen, lashes. His system tamed the hardest

cases in the fleet—good men, whom Lord St Vincent would have flogged

to death, or sent to the yard-arm. In conclusion we may quote one of

those who saw the last days of flogging: “My firm conviction is that

the bad man was very little the better; the good man very much the

worse. The good man felt the disgrace, and was branded for life. His

self-esteem was permanently maimed, and he rarely held up his head or

did his best again.” Such was the effect of the favourite punishment

in the time of the consulship of Plancus.

[Illustration: A FLOGGING AT THE GANGWAY]

Those who transgressed the rules of the ship or of the service during

the day were put upon the report of the master-at-arms. The names

were submitted by that officer to the first lieutenant, who passed

them to the captain every forenoon. Drunkards and mutinous subjects

generally passed a night in irons under the half-deck, in the care

of an armed marine, before coming up for sentence. Every forenoon,

at about half-past ten, those who were on the report went below for

their smartest clothes, in the hope that a neat appearance might

mollify the captain. Those who were in irons got their messmates to

bring them their clothes. At six bells, or eleven o’clock in the

forenoon, the captain came on deck, with a paper bearing the names of

all delinquents. He bade the lieutenant turn the hands aft to witness

punishment. The lieutenant sent a midshipman to the boatswain’s

mates, and the order was piped and shouted. The marines fell in upon

the poop, with their muskets and side-arms. The junior officers

gathered to windward under the break of the poop. The captain and

lieutenants stood on the weather quarter-deck. The ship’s company

fell in anyhow, on the booms, boats, and lee-side of the ship,

directly forward of the main-mast. The doctor and purser fell in

to leeward, under the break of the poop, with the boatswain and

boatswain’s mates in a little gang in front of them. The captain’s

first order was “rig the gratings.” The carpenter and carpenter’s

mates at once dragged aft two of the wooden gratings which covered

the hatches. One of these was placed flat upon the deck. The other

was placed upright, and secured in that position against the ship’s

side or poop railings. When the gratings had been reported rigged

the captain called forward the first offender on his list, and told

him that he had transgressed the rules of the service, knowing the

penalty. He asked the man if he had anything to say in extenuation.

If he had nothing to say the order was “Strip.” The man flung off his

shirt, and advanced bare-shouldered to the gratings, and extended his

arms upon the upright. The captain then gave the order “Seize him

up.” The quarter-masters advanced, with lengths of spun-yarn, with

which they tied the man’s hands to the grating. They then reported

“Seized up, sir.” At this point the captain produced a copy of

the Articles of War, and read that Article which the offender had

infringed. As he read he took off his hat, to show his respect for

the King’s commandments. Every man present did the same. While the

Article was being read one of the boatswain’s mates undid a red baize

bag, and produced the red-handled cat, with which he was to execute

punishment. At the order “Do your duty,” he advanced to the man at

the grating, drew the cat tails through his fingers, flung his arm

back, and commenced to flog, with his full strength, at the full

sweep of his arm. He was generally a powerful seaman, and he knew

very well that any sign of favouritism would infallibly cause his

disrating, if it did not subject him to the same torture. Some seamen

could take a dozen, or, as they expressed it, “get a red checked

shirt at the gangway,” without crying aloud. But the force of each

blow was such that the recipient had the breath knocked clean out of

him, “with an involuntary Ugh.” One blow was sufficient to take off

the skin, and to draw blood wherever the knots fell. Six blows were

enough to make the back positively raw. Twelve blows cut deeply into

it, and left it a horrible red slough, sickening to look upon. Yet

three dozen was a common punishment. Six dozen lashes were counted as

nothing. Three hundred lashes were very frequently given.

Before a severe punishment the sufferer’s messmates used to bring

him their tots of grog, saved up from supper the night before, so

that he might at least begin his torture in blessed stupefaction.

After a severe punishment they took the poor mangled body down to the

sick-bay, and left it there in the care of the surgeon. A body that

had been severely lashed looked something like raw veal. It generally

healed up, but for weeks after the punishment the sufferer’s life was

a misery to him, for reasons which may be read in the proper place,

but which need not be quoted here.

It may interest some people to know what the punishment felt like. A

ruffian has left it on record that it was “nothing but an O, and a

few O my Gods, and then you can put on your shirt.” It was more than

that. A very hardy fellow may have found a dozen or so comparatively

easy to bear. But when the lashes ran into the scores it became a

different matter. We will quote a poor soldier who was flogged in

1832 with a cat precisely similar to that used in the King’s fleet.

“I felt an astounding sensation between the shoulders, under my neck,

which went to my toe-nails in one direction, and my finger-nails in

another, and stung me to the heart, as if a knife had gone through

my body.... He came on a second time a few inches lower, and then I

thought the former stroke was sweet and agreeable compared with that

one.... I felt my flesh quiver in every nerve, from the scalp of my

head to my toe-nails. The time between each stroke seemed so long

as to be agonising, and yet the next came too soon.... The pain in

my lungs was more severe, I thought, than on my back. I felt as if

I would burst in the internal parts of my body.... I put my tongue

between my teeth, held it there, and bit it almost in two pieces.

What with the blood from my tongue, and my lips, which I had also

bitten, and the blood from my lungs, or some other internal part,

ruptured by the writhing agony, I was almost choked, and became black

in the face.... Only fifty had been inflicted, and the time since

they began was like a long period of life; I felt as if I had lived

all the time of my real life in pain and torture, and that the time

when existence had pleasure in it was a dream, long, long gone by.”

Another man, who saw a good deal of flogging in his time, has told

us that, after the infliction of two dozen lashes, “the lacerated

back looks inhuman; it resembles roasted meat burnt nearly black

before a scorching fire.” The later blows were not laid on less

heartily than the first. The striker cleaned the tails of the cat

after each blow, so that they should not clog together with flesh

and blood, and thus deaden the effect. A fresh boatswain’s mate was

put on to flog after each two dozen. Some captains boasted of having

left-handed boatswain’s mates, who could “cross the cuts” made by the

right-handed men.

For striking “an admiral, a commodore, captain, or lieutenant,” or

“for attempting to escape,” no matter what provocation may have been

given, the most lenient punishment inflicted was flogging through

the fleet. The man was put into the ship’s long-boat, and lashed by

his wrists to a capstan bar. Stockings were inserted between the

wrists and the lashing “to prevent him from tearing the flesh off

in his agonies.” The other boats of the ship were lowered, and each

ship in the harbour sent a boat manned with marines to attend the

punishment. The master-at-arms and the ship’s surgeon accompanied

the victim. Before the boat cast off from the ship the captain read

the sentence from the gangway. A boatswain’s mate then came down

the ladder, and inflicted a certain number of lashes on the man. The

boat then rowed away from the ship, to the sound of the half-minute

bell, the oars keeping time to the drummer, who beat the rogue’s

march beside the victim. The attendant boats followed, in a doleful

procession, rowing slowly to the same music. On coming to the next

ship the ceremony was repeated, after which the poor man was cast

off and covered with a blanket, and allowed to compose himself. He

received a portion of his torture near each ship in the port, “until

the sentence was completed.” If he fainted he was plied with wine or

rum, or, in some cases, taken back to the sick-bay of his ship to

recover. In the latter case he stayed till his back had healed, when

he was again led out to receive the rest of the sentence. “After he

has been alongside of several ships,” says Jack Nastyface, who often

saw these punishments, “his back resembles so much putrified liver.”

Those who lived through the whole of the punishment were washed

with brine, cured, and sent back to their duty. But the punishment

was so terrible that very few lived through it all. Joshua Davis

tells us of a corpse being brought alongside, with the head hanging

down and the bones laid bare from the neck to the waist. There

were still fifty lashes due to the man, so they were given to the

corpse, at the captain’s order. Those who died during the infliction

of the punishment were rowed ashore, and buried in the mud below

the tidemark, without religious rites. Those who survived such

fearful ordeals were broken men when they came out of the sick-bay.

They lived but a little while afterwards, in a nervous and pitiful

condition, suffering acutely in many ways. It is said that those who

were flogged through the fleet were offered the alternative of the

gallows.

A man caught thieving was generally set to run the gauntlet. The

members of the ship’s crew formed into a double line right round

the main or spar deck. Each man armed himself with three tarry rope

yarns, which he twisted up into what was called a knittle or nettle,

knotted at the end, and about three feet long. The thief was stripped

to the waist, and brought to one end of the line. The master-at-arms

stood in front of him, with a drawn sword pointing to his breast. Two

ship’s corporals stood close behind him, with drawn swords pointing

to his back. If he went too quickly or too slowly the sword points

pricked him. When he was placed in position at the end of a line a

boatswain’s mate gave him a dozen lashes with the thieves’ cat. He

was then slowly walked (or dragged on a grating) through the double

line of men, who flogged him with their nettles as he walked past

them. When he arrived at the end of a line a boatswain’s mate gave

him another taste of the thieves’ cat, and either started him down

another line or turned him back by the way he had come. It was very

cruel punishment, for it flayed the whole of the upper part of a

man’s body, not omitting his head. After running the gauntlet the

man went into hospital, to be rubbed with brine and healed. He was

then sent back to his duty, “without a stain upon his character.” He

had purged his offence. It was never again mentioned by his shipmates.

Those who contradicted an officer—or appeared to contradict him, by

answering back, however respectfully—were punished by gagging. The

lieutenants had no power to flog, but they had power to inflict minor

punishments. Gagging was one of those they inflicted on their own

initiative. The offender was brought to the rigging, or to the bitts,

with his hands tied behind him. An iron marline spike was placed

across his mouth, between his teeth, like a bit. The ends were fitted

with spun-yarn, which was passed round the head, and knotted there

to keep the iron in position. With this heavy piece of iron in his

mouth the man had to stand till his mouth was bloody, or till the

officer relented. If a man displeased an officer at any time, he was

often punished on the spot, by a boatswain’s mate. The officer would

call a boatswain’s mate and say: “Start that man.” The boatswain’s

mate at once produced a hard knotted cord, called a starter, with

which he beat the man unmercifully about the head and shoulders,

till the officer bade him to desist. The sailors found the starting

even harder to bear than the cat, for it generally fell upon their

arms as they raised them to protect their heads. It was very severe

punishment, and frequently caused such swollen and bruised arms that

the sailors could not bear to wear their jackets. It was inflicted

with very little cause. Whenever an order was given the boatswain’s

mates drew out their colts or starters and thrashed the men to their

duty with indiscriminating cruelty. It was not lawful punishment,

being wholly unauthorised by regulation. But there was no appeal;

the sailors had to grin and bear it. After 1811 it was very strictly

suppressed.

The boatswain, master-at-arms, and ship’s corporals, with their

rattans, or supplejacks, were every whit as ready to thrash the

seamen as the boatswain’s mates. They, too, carried colts, or

starters, made of 3-inch rope, so unlaid that the strands made three

knotted tails. With these they beat the seamen for any slight, or

fancied slight, until their arms were tired. The sergeant of marines

was similarly provided, but his attentions were confined to his own

department. He had no power over the bluejackets, except in fifth and

sixth rates. Besides all these petty tyrants there were the lesser

bullies, the midshipmen, who took delight in torturing the seamen in

many ways.

The old-fashioned punishments of ducking from the yard-arm, and

keel-hauling, were not practised in our fleet. They had fallen out of

use during the eighteenth century, though the French still practised

them. Captain Glascock saw a Frenchman keel-hauled early in the last

century. Instead of them, there were other punishments, such as a

disciplinarian could invent on the spot. Spitting on the decks was

discouraged by fastening buckets round the offender’s neck, and

causing the man to walk the lower deck, as a sort of peripatetic

cuspidor. Minor offences were punished by stoppage of grog, or of

some part of it; by the infliction of dirty or harassing duty; or by

riding a man on a gun with his feet tied together beneath the piece.

Capital offences were expiated at the yard-arm. The man was taken

to the cathead, a yellow flag was flown at the masthead, a gun was

fired, and all the bad characters of the ship manned the yard-rope,

and ran the victim up to the end of the yard.

Sea life in Nelson's time · 第 6 / 9 章