It is not by encouraging useless strikes, or by making an attempt, which

in the end must always be defeated, to sustain a vast body of workmen and

their families, when not in the receipt of wages, that the wire-pullers

of the trades unions will best serve the interests of their clients, or

enhance their personal influence among them. But there is a wide field

of usefulness open to these captains of our great hosts of workmen, in

which success is to be attained, not by war, but by diplomacy. The state

of the trades, in which their clients are employed, should be carefully

watched, and every variation in the prices quoted, every fluctuation in

the cost of the raw materials should be noted. And here I may frankly

admit that the proposal of the International for a universal strike

contained a few grains of wisdom; for it is clear that, if the cost of

producing an article in England were so much enhanced by an advance of

wages, that the foreign manufacturer would be enabled to undersell us in

every market, it would be an act of self-destruction for English workmen

to insist upon a rise, which would have the inevitable effect of

depriving them of employment.

In such a case, unless the workmen in the competing countries can agree

to act in concert, an advance is impossible; unless by superior skill or

machinery the more highly paid workman is able to turn out a larger

amount of work.

Foreign competition.

It has been already pointed out that in England we have to contend

against competition of two kinds—against the cheaper labour of the

Continent on the one side, and against the superior natural resources of

America on the other. While we occupy at the present time a highly

favoured position, which has been attained not merely by the skill of our

workmen, but by the administrative skill of their employers, and the

gradual accumulation of an ample capital in their hands, the race with

other great manufacturing countries is very close. The Swiss have

entered into competition with our own manufacturers, both in the home and

foreign trades. The exports of textile fabrics from Switzerland, as we

learn from Mr. Gosling’s report, have risen from £12,485,000 in 1860, to

£26,464,000 in 1871, an advance of 112½ per cent. In this total the

exports to the United States have risen from £509,000 in 1862, to

£2,159,000 in 1872, in other words, over 324 per cent. In cheap silks

and ribbons the Swiss are able to compete with the British producer in

the English market; and, to sum up the case in the words of Mr. Gosling,

‘The advantages of Switzerland in competition with Great Britain are the

use of water power as a substitute for steam power to the extent of

upwards of 80 per cent., low wages, long hours of labour, and a minimum

expenditure for management.’ On the other hand, as an inland country,

Switzerland has to pay heavy freights, the workmen are inferior in

activity to our own, buildings for machinery are more costly, and from

want of capital, production is on a smaller scale than here. The

balance, however, seems to be greatly in favour of Switzerland, and

cannot fail to become greater from day to day.

Such being the case as regards textile industry, Mr. Lothian Bell has

recently pointed out, that, in ores of the finer descriptions, the

resources of the United States are unlimited, while in coal our own

wealth is, in comparison, poverty. There is but one bar to the boundless

production of minerals in the New World, that is to say, the want of

hands to manufacture them.

Communism in Germany.

A large number of the working class in Germany have been fascinated by

the fanciful theories of Lassalle. His system is founded entirely upon

the pernicious principle that the State is to do everything, and the

people nothing for themselves. Karl Marx, as the successor of Lassalle,

is the ruling spirit of the German socialists, and has become a prominent

figure from his connection with the International. The socialist

journals in Germany delight to reproduce the programme and doctrines of

that society. They make noisy professions of atheism. They applauded

the insurrection of the Commune in Paris. They have a collection of

songs of their own. They disavow the warlike policy of Germany, and have

endeavoured to substitute the community of class interests for the

community of race, language, and country. It must not, however, be

supposed that the number of these unpractical visionaries is

proportionate to the noise, which they make in the world. The influence

of socialistic doctrines is not so great in England as on the Continent,

and it is weaker in America than in England. I hope, therefore, that no

disposition may be manifested here to abandon the hopeful work of social,

moral, and material progress for the pursuit of visionary and impossible

schemes.

The amelioration of the condition of the poor is not to be brought about

by destroying the ancient fabric and foundations of our social and

political system. It is easy to destroy but most difficult to restore

the institutions created by past generations, in which there lived men

not less great, and wise, and good than the most gifted of our own

contemporaries. Mr. Ruskin, a devoted friend of the working classes, in

a passage of more than ordinary eloquence, has truly said, ‘This is the

thing, which I know, and which, if you labour faithfully, you shall know

also,—that in Reverence is the chief power and joy of life;—Reverence,

for what is pure and bright in your own youth; for what is true and tried

in the age of others; for all that is gracious among the living, great

among the dead, and marvellous in the Powers that cannot die.’

Co-operation.

Our artisans may believe that the profits of former days were so large

that employers can afford to pay the present rates of wages, without

raising their charges to the consumers. There is but one means, by which

this fallacy can be exposed. The workmen must become to a certain extent

their own employers. In a co-operative establishment, created in part by

his own hardly-earned savings, the handicraftsman will find himself

called upon to apportion equitably the earnings of his business between

labour and capital. In this double relation he will learn how great are

the difficulties, which beset the employment of capital in productive

industry in a country, in which competition is so keen as it is in

England. In no other country does capital command so low a rate of

interest; and, if large accumulations of capital have been made, and

money is therefore cheap, it should not be inferred that the rate of

profit has been high by comparison with other countries, but rather that

our employers of labour, as a class, have been distinguished by their

frugality, their perseverance, and their enterprise. I am grateful,

therefore, to Mr. Holyoake, for his vindication of their claims at the

recent Co-operative Congress. He justly said that capital was the enemy

of nobody, but rather the nursing mother of production.

The co-operative principle, in its application to the business of

distribution, has been already most successfully developed. My desire is

to encourage working men to create co-operative establishments for the

purposes of production. The accumulation of the necessary capital is an

obvious difficulty; but as wages were never so high as at present, so

this obstacle can be more easily surmounted now than at any former time.

Some men may object to recognise the special responsibilities of a

fellow-workman holding the office of manager of a large business, by

giving a proportionate salary. It is because the recognition of

authority is essential, whenever anything practical is to be done, that

the International Society has shown such uncompromising hostility to the

co-operative principle. The denial of a proportionate reward for

superior intelligence or industry is the first article of its catechism.

The absurdity of attempting to combine the energies of the men for any

definite object, without placing a competent chief at their head, has

been humorously exposed by Mr. Carlyle. ‘Ships,’ he said, ‘did not use

the ballot-box at all, and they rejected the phantasm species of

captains. Phantasm captains with unanimous votings! These are

considered to be all the law and prophets at present. If a man shake out

of his mind the universal noise of political doctors in this generation,

and in the last generation or two, and consider the matter face to face

with his own sincere intelligence looking at it, I venture to say he

would find this a very extraordinary method of navigating, whether in the

Straits of Magellan, or the undiscovered sea of time.’

English workmen are less easily deluded by tall talk and sophistry than

the more excitable populations of the Latin race; and I would earnestly

invite them to apply their practical sagacity to the difficult yet

hopeful experiment of co-operative industry.

Demand and supply determine wages.

I must once more repeat the familiar axiom, that the price of labour,

like that of every other commodity, must mainly depend upon the relation

between supply and demand. The wages of skilled workmen have risen,

because skilled workmen are scarce. How shall we increase their number,

and improve their skill? My answer is, by bringing recruits into our

industrial army from a class of society, which has hitherto exhibited too

strong a prejudice against manual labour. The same aversion to

handicraft of every kind exists in the United States and Canada. In

America a skilled workman earns 30 dollars, a clerk only 15 dollars a

week; and, while it is almost as difficult for a clerk to obtain a

situation in New York as in London, a skilled workman can always command

employment. It is unnecessary to dwell on the evils that must ensue from

a disproportionate increase in the non-productive classes of the

community. Lord Bacon has truly said, that a population is not to be

reckoned only by numbers, for a smaller number that spend more and earn

less do wear out a greater number that live lower and get more. My

father’s advice was often sought by parents anxious for the future of

their sons. His counsel always was, that a young man, whose destiny it

must be to make his way, unaided, through the world, should begin by

learning a trade. It is a laudable ambition in a parent to endeavour to

raise his family to a better station in life. He cannot bestow on his

children too high an education. But a wise man will be on his guard,

lest the enjoyment of such advantages should render those occupations

distasteful, which afford the most secure and ample livelihood to those

whose lot it is to labour. When justly appreciated, the condition of the

skilled artisan should be as much esteemed as that of any other class of

the community. He whose life is passed in performing such needed

services for his fellow-men, whatever his special calling, holds an

honorable station, and social dignity will ever be most effectually

maintained by those who are the least dependent upon the favours of

others.

Forethought.

In conclusion, I would tender a few words of advice to my

fellow-countrymen of the so-called working classes, for whose welfare I

am bound to feel the deepest solicitude. Their just claim to share in

the benefits arising from a thriving industry has of late been liberally

recognised. The earnings in many trades have been unprecedented. It

should not be forgotten that forethought is an especial duty in a time of

prosperity. At no distant period, the progress of our commerce may

sustain at least a temporary check. It will be sad indeed if the

receding tide leaves behind it multitudes of our highly-paid workmen

without the slightest provision to meet a period of adversity.

* * * * *

* * * * *

_Spottiswoode & Co._, _Printers_, _New-street Square_, _London_.

Wages in 1873: Address read before the Social Science Association at Norwich · 第 3 / 3 段