CHAPTER IX

"OH, HOW GOOD IT WAS!"

_All Ranks join our Corps of Contributors, and the Oasis of

Literature sparkles like a Fountain in a Desert._

Generals, colonels, majors, captains, subalterns, privates, war

correspondents who had not connected themselves with our venture,

naval officers--all ranks and all sorts, suddenly rushed to our

support, in consequence of my wail for help, and THE FRIEND took on an

interest and importance proportionately greater, I think, than that of

any newspaper then published in the language. Its circulation rose

among the thousands whereas the largest daily distribution had been

only 400 copies before the war.

We numbered the paper of March 24th "No. 6," though it was in reality

the eighth copy we had published, six being the number since we had

enlarged it to its final size. I marvel at our success as I look back

upon this number.

Sir William Nicholson, K.C.B., wrote an appreciation of the character,

life, and work of the late Sir William Lockhart; General Sir Henry E.

Colvile sent us a double acrostic, which the Dutch ones among our

eccentric compositors ruined so far beyond repair that it would not

be just to reproduce its mangled remains; Mr. Lionel James, who had

come over from the Natal side to further distinguish the staff of the

_Times_, wrote upon the death of our gifted colleague, George W.

Steevens. Rudyard Kipling contributed to this number the first of his

delicious "Fables for the Staff"; a distinguished officer, who shall

remain nameless in this connection, contributed an article on "Beards

in War"; and Mr. Gwynne began a series of letters entitled "Is the Art

of War Revolutionised?" written solely to interest the Army and spur

its thinking men to respond.

Mr. H. Prevost Battersby, of the London _Morning Post_, was another

distinguished contributor to this number.

Mr. Kipling now became a regular harnessed member of the four-in-hand

team that pulled the paper. With pen in hand and pipe in mouth he sat

at the larger of the two tables in our editorial poke-hole, and

beginning with a "Now, what shall I do? Write a poem, fill out cables,

or correct proofs?" would fall to and toil away with an enthusiasm

born of the long time it had been since he had "smelled the sawdust of

the ring."

"Oh, how good it is to be at work in a newspaper office again!" he

exclaimed on the first day, doubtless with recollections of the

sanctum of the _Allahabad Pioneer_ strong upon him, and the memory of

the time when the precursors of the "Plain Tales" and of the Barrack

Room Ballads were demanded of him almost every day, and gave him the

practice to produce the carefully finished and matured work we are now

seeing in the novel "Kim," at which he was at work--in the laboratory

of his mind--even as he sat with us in Bloemfontein.

We wondered at his enthusiasm, and, perhaps, had it not been of his

doing, we should have resented the impetus it gave us to toil as never

war correspondents worked before--all day for THE FRIEND and far into

the nights to catch the mails with our home correspondence. But we

soon came to see that the same tremendous energy and ceaseless flow of

wit and fancy were his by nature, and would have found expression as

well in a tent on the veldt as in that office. He was always while

with us like a great healthy boy in spirits and vitality, good humour,

and enterprise.

With us he yelled "Haven't any; go to Barlow's shop around the

corner," to the Tommies who trod on one another's heels to get copies

of the paper from us who had not got them. With us he consigned the

Dutch compositor to aeons of boiling torment for the trouble his errors

gave us. With us he entertained Lord Stanley, who now came, out of

kindness, at noon every day, to save us the trouble of sending our

proof-sheets over to him at his office. And from us he insisted upon

taking all the "Tommy poetry," as we called it, that came to the

office. When we derided much of it as outrageous twaddle, he praised

its quality. On this day, I remember, we were belittling a particular

poem that he was reading, and he called out, "Why, that is splendid

stuff! Listen to these lines--'Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the

waves: Britons never, never, never shall be slaves!'" The reader will

not find this particular poem in this book, though it was put in THE

FRIEND by our distinguished poetry editor.

* * * * *

THE FRIEND.

(_Edited by the War Correspondents with Lord Roberts' Force._)

SATURDAY, MARCH 24, 1900.

FABLES FOR THE STAFF.[2]

[Footnote 2: Copyrighted in England and America; used here by Mr.

Kipling's leave.]

KING LOG AND KING STORK.

BY RUDYARD KIPLING.

I.

Certain Boers, having blown up a Bridge, departed in the Face of the

British Army, which, arriving at that dynamited Place, made Outcry to

the Gods, saying, "Oh, Jupiter, these Ruffians have blocked the

Traffic, and we are vastly incommoded. Is there Anything worse than

the Boer?"

This being reported to the Railway Authorities, they caused a Railway

Staff Officer to be sent to that Bridge with Instructions to

facilitate Matters by all means in his Power.

Later on They picked up What was left of the British Army in those

parts--one dusty Shovelful, and its Lamentations were louder than

before.

"Ungrateful Wretches," said the Military Authorities; "what would you

now have?"

And the Remnant of the British with one Accord answered, "Give us back

the Boer!"

* * * * *

COMMANDEERING.

Our hero was a Tommy, with a conscience free from care.

And such an open countenance that when he breathed the air

He used up all the atmosphere--so little went to spare.

You could hardly say he breathed,--he commandeered it.

For, nowadays, you'll notice when a man is "on the make,"

And other people's property is anxious for to take,

We never use such words as steal, or "collar," "pinch," or "shake:"

The fashion is to say he "commandeers" it.

And our simple-minded hero used to grumble at his lot;

Said he, "This commandeerin's just a little bit too hot.

A fellow has to carry every blooming thing he's got,

For whatever he lets fall they'll commandeer it."

So, at last in desperation, this most simple-minded elf,

He thought he'd do a little commandeering for himself;

And the first thing that he noticed was a bottle on a shelf

In a cottage, so he thought he'd commandeer it.

"What ho!" says he, "a bottle! and, by George, it's full of beer!

And there's no commandin' officer to come and interfere.

So here's my bloomin' health," says he; "I'm on the commandeer."

And without another word he commandeered it.

ANONYMOUS.

* * * * *

SIR WILLIAM LOCKHART.

BY SIR WILLIAM NICHOLSON, K.C.B.

Sir William Lockhart's death, as recently announced in Army Orders,

will be deeply deplored by his many friends in the Army in South

Africa. It was known that he had been seriously ill last September,

but he had seemingly recovered when he visited Burma in December. On

his return to Calcutta in January, symptoms developed themselves which

caused great anxiety, and, although he telegraphed to the effect that

he hoped soon to be all right again, the end was not far distant.

Apart from his ability as a soldier and administrator, Sir William

Lockhart endeared himself to all who had the privilege of his personal

acquaintance by his charming manners, his genial hospitality and his

kindness of heart. Born in 1842, he joined the Indian Army in 1858,

and during the Mutiny he was attached to the 7th Fusiliers. He

afterwards served with the 26th Punjab Infantry, the 10th Bengal

Lancers, and the 14th Bengal Lancers. He was employed on the Staff in

the Abyssinian Expedition.

When the Acheen War broke out he was attached to the Headquarters of

the Dutch Force, where he made himself extremely popular. It was

interesting to hear him describe the Dutch method of fighting, which,

as might be imagined, led to no decisive result. The climate being

tropical, the Dutch would only attack the enemy in the early morning;

the rest of the day being spent in camp. The enemy were more active,

and caused the Dutch much annoyance by frequently disturbing their

afternoon siesta. As no means of transport were asked for or provided,

the campaign was of a purely defensive nature, and at the end of it

things were virtually in the same state as at the beginning.

After remaining in Acheen about eighteen months, Lockhart returned to

India, where he joined the Quartermaster-General's Department, and at

the beginning of the Afghan War he was chosen to take charge of the

line of communications up the Khyber. He afterwards joined Lord

Roberts' Staff as Assistant Quartermaster-General at Kabul, and for a

short time acted as Chief of the Staff on Charles MacGregor being

selected for the command of a brigade. In that capacity he had hoped

to accompany his illustrious Chief in the march from Kabul to

Kandahar, but General Chapman being his senior on the staff, it was

decided, much to Lockhart's disappointment, that he should return to

India as Chief of the Staff with the troops under Sir Donald Stewart's

command.

He received a C.B. and brevet Colonelcy for his services in

Afghanistan, and was afterwards appointed Deputy Quartermaster-General

for Intelligence at Army Headquarters, where he remained until 1886,

when Lord Roberts became Commander-in-Chief in India in succession to

Sir Donald Stewart. He was then sent on an exploring expedition with

the late Colonel Woodthorpe, R.E., to Chitral and Kafiristan, and the

admirable report which he drew up was of the greatest value to the

Government of India in considering what steps should be taken to guard

the northern passes between the Pamirs and the Peshawar Valley.

On his return to India, Lockhart was offered the

Quartermaster-Generalship in that country, but he preferred the

command of a Brigade in Burma, where he greatly distinguished himself

by his activity in pursuit of Dacoits. His health, however, was

undermined by continual attacks of fever, and he had to be invalided

home, where, after a short interval, he became Assistant Military

Secretary for India at the Horse Guards.

After holding this post for a couple of years, he accepted the command

of the Punjab Frontier Force, which was offered him by Lord Roberts,

and in that capacity he commanded a brigade in the Black Mountain

Expedition under the late Sir W. K. Elles, and held the chief command

in the Waziristan and Isazai Expeditions. No abler or more sympathetic

general ever commanded the Punjab Frontier Force; he was beloved alike

by the British officers and the Native ranks; he maintained the

traditions of the Force and raised it to the highest standard of

efficiency; and when he left it he had good reason for regarding it,

as he always did regard it, as the _corps d'elite_ of the Indian Army.

In April, 1895, the Presidential Armies were broken up and the Army

Corps System was introduced, Sir William Lockhart being nominated to the

command of the Forces in the Punjab. In this appointment he displayed

administrative talents of a high order, his main object being to

decentralise responsibility and authority, and to diminish office work

and official correspondence. It was in a great measure due to his

efforts in this direction that the new system worked so smoothly. When

he became Commander-in-Chief he kept the same end in view by granting

the fullest possible powers to the Lieutenant-Generals of the four

Commands and to the General Officers commanding Districts, and by

insisting on their making use of those powers to the fullest extent.

In March, 1897, Sir William Lockhart went home, having been advised to

undergo a course of treatment at Nauheim. Meanwhile, disturbances took

place along the North-West Frontier, which culminated in an outbreak

of the Orakzaia and Afridis, and the capture by the latter of our

posts in the Khyber Pass. In September he was hurriedly recalled to

India for the purpose of commanding the Tirah Expeditionary Force.

This is not the place to discuss the operations in Tirah, which were

much criticised at home. The fact is that the British public had

become so accustomed to almost bloodless victories over savage enemies

that they failed to appreciate the extraordinary difficulties of the

Afridi country, and the advantages to the defence which the possession

of long-range rifles and smokeless powder confers. Moreover, there are

no better marksmen in the world than the Afridis, who are born

soldiers, and the mobility of hardy mountaineers in their native hills

necessarily exceeds that of regular troops encumbered with baggage and

supplies.

Anyhow, the result of the expedition fully justified the choice of its

commander. The Afridis acknowledged themselves to be thoroughly

beaten; and Sir William Lockhart's tact in dealing with them after

they had submitted has led to the re-establishment of friendly

relations between them and ourselves on a firmer basis than before.

What their present attitude is may be judged from the fact that Yar

Mahomed, the head of the Malikdin Khels, recently petitioned the

Government of India to be allowed to raise 1,500 tribesmen for service

in South Africa.

On the conclusion of the Tirah campaign Sir William Lockhart took

leave to England, and came out again as Commander-in-Chief in India in

November, 1898. He died on the 18th of March, 1900. In him, as Lord

Roberts has remarked in his Army Order of the 20th inst., "the

soldiers in India have lost a friend, and the Indian Empire a trusted

counsellor who cannot soon or easily be replaced."

The late Commander-in-Chief was one of the few remaining

representatives of the Quartermaster-General's Department in India,

and to the admirable training which that department afforded much of

his success as a soldier must be ascribed. No better school of

practical instruction in Staff duties could be desired. Among its

pupils may be mentioned Lord Roberts himself, Sir Charles MacGregor,

Sir Herbert Stewart, Sir William Lockhart, and Sir Alfred Gaselee.

Now, alas! it has been abolished, or, at least, incorporated in the

Adjutant-General's Department.

* * * * *

THE QUARTERMASTER'S YARN.

E. J. K. NEWMAN, LIEUT. R.N.

DEAR MR. EDITOR,--The following lines were written by me on board the

mail steamer, about two young soldiers now serving with the army:--

'Twas on the deck, that around our ship, from the mast to the

taffrail ran,

I saw alone, in a chair (not their own), a tall young girl and a man.

Her hair was light and fluffy and swarthy and dark was he,

And I saw the coon, one afternoon, a-spooning that girl quite free.

So I spotted a Quartermaster bold as he went from the wheel to tea,

And I asked that Jack, if upon that tack, the passengers went to sea.

"Lord love yer honour, we often sees that, the stewards and the

likes of us;

There's always couples a-spooning there, but we never makes no fuss.

"If you look around, you'll see, I'll be bound, each day at a

quarter to three,

A tall young fellow with curly hair and a girl in black, quite

young and fair, That's another couple," says he.

"And every night, I assure you it's right, straight up on this

deck they'll come

And spoon around, till it's time to go down. One night 'twas a

quarter to one."

"Now it suddenly struck me early one morn, this might be a

serious thing.

Perhaps they loves, these two little doves, and has offered

them the ring.

So I leaves them alone in the world of their own; and this

'twixt you and me,

I hope I shall, by each little gal, to the wedding invited be."

LATER.

Then the Quartermaster brushed away a tear with his horny hand,

The last couple now have had a row, and don't speak, I understand.

'Tis not a fable, she won't sit at his table As she used to do of old;

But has taken up with a married man, At least, so I've been told.

OLD SALT.

* * * * *

THE SECOND RELIEF OF KIMBERLEY.

DEAR FRIEND,--I suppose that General French and his lot think they

relieved Kimberley? Well, that's all right, and in spite of his name

being forrin, he's a good chap; so, as Billy the Sailor says, let's

make it so. But I should like to know where would French be now if it

wasn't for Billy and the Yank?

Now, you being an up-to-date paper, we thought you might like to have

an account of the battle which hasn't ever yet appeared in any paper

in the world, yet, as our Adjutant would say, was the most

strategically important part of the whole blooming show.

It was me and Billy and the Yank. Billy's a sailor--says he was

leftenant in the Navy, and I really believe he might have been--he

couldn't have learnt to ride so badly anywhere else, and how he faked

himself through the riding test is a miracle--then his langwidge is

beautiful. The Yank's a Yank; you can tell that by his langwidge, too,

and me being an old soldier (12 years in the Buffs and discharge

certificate all correct), I was made No. 1 of our section; our No. 4

was an Irishman we left behind at Orange with a broken head, all

through fighting outside the Canteen.

Well, when French left Modder, February 15th, we hadn't a horse among

the three of us fit to carry his own skin; so there we was left. Our

troop leader said he hoped to Heaven he'd seen the last of us, but all

the same he gave us a written order, correct enough, to catch up the

squadron as soon as possible. There wasn't much doing all day, barring

a bit of cooking, but that evening we was sitting round the fire when

an M.I. chap comes round and says he's heard there'd be free drinks

for the Relief Force in Kimberley, and perhaps our pals was drinking

'em now. That was the first time our Billy really woke up all day.

"Free drinks," sezee; "that's my sailing orders." Me and the Yank

didn't mind, so we sounds boot and saddle to ourselves in the dark,

and off we slips without a word to nobody. My horse seemed cheered up

by the day's rest, but before I'd gone half a mile I found I got the

wrong horse by mistake! and you'll hardly believe that both Billy and

the Yank had made mistakes too! Lor', how we did laugh! but there,

there ain't no accounting for horses in the dark.

We each had our own notions of the road; the Yank swore he was

tracking the big English cavalry horses; Billy was steering Nor' Wes'

by Nor' on some star or other; and I didn't want to argufy, so I just

shoves on a couple of lengths and marched on the Kimberley flashlight.

We was going a fair pace too ("making six knots"), and had done near

two hours, when all of a sudden we comes over a kopje right on to the

top of a bivouack, fires and all.

"Let's get"--"Go astern"--"Sections about"--and we did so, back behind

the kopje, linked horses, and crawled up again on our hands and knees.

"First thing," says I, quoting our Adjutant, "is to kalkulate the

numbers of the enemy."

"Twenty thousand," says Billy, who always did reckon a bit large.

"Make it hundreds," says the Yank, sneering--"and I wouldn't mind

betting a pint myself that there was the best part of two dozen of

'em."

"Next point," says I, "who are they?"

"I bleeve they're Highlanders, after all," says Billy; "see the way

they're lowering whisky out of them bottles."

"Well then," says the Yank, "you'd better ride up and say you're the

General, and they'll drop the whisky and run."

"Highlanders," says I, "don't care a cuss for Boers nor Generals, but

say you're the Provost Marshal and they won't stop running this side

of Kimberley."

"Those men, sir," says the Yank, "air not Highlanders. Billy's eyes

was took with them bottles and got no further. Those men don't wear

leg curtains, nor even loud checked bags. They air Boers." And by

Jove he was right.

"Well then," says I, getting back to point three, "what's their

position?"

"Straight there," says the Yank. "Mostly lying on their stummicks,"

says Billy.

"My friends," says I, "if your Adjutant should hear you now he'd break

his blighted heart. Look here, there's General French lowering free

drinks in Kimberley, ain't he? There's the British infantry at Modder,

ten miles back, ain't they? And there's twenty thousand Boers plunk in

the middle, ain't they? That means, as Adjy would say, General French

is busted. Vaultin' ambition! Another orful disaster!"

"My friends, we must reskew General French."

"General be blowed!" says Billy; "let's reskew the whisky."

"Well, bein' agreed on reskewin', wot's our plan of battle? A frontal

attack is always to be depre--well, something that means it's a bally

error." "Take 'em on the starboard quarter, then."

"But the first principel of tactics is to mystify and mislead the

foe."

So far the Yank had been lying rather low, but now he chips in--

"Say, chum, you've pegged it out straight there, and if it ain't

jumping your claim, I'll carry on the working." He did know a bit, the

Yank did, and we'd fixed up the job in no time. He'd a bag of about a

hundred loose cartridges he'd been carrying for days, and in two

minutes he'd a nice hot glowing fire right down in a cleft behind the

kopjy where it didn't show a bit. "Now boys," says I, taking command

again, "that bag of cartridges on the top of that fire will make as

much musketry noise as a brigade fits of joy. We'll let them have a

few real bullets bang in the middle to help out the illooshun. We're

three full battalions advancing to attack, and mind you let them hear

it; not a word till the first cartridge pops off, and then all the

noise you know."

We extended to fifty paces. Billy said it would come more natural if

he was the Naval Brigade, and we puts him on the right. The Yank

wanted to be the "Fighting Fifth," it reminded him somehow of fighting

Stonewall Jackson down South; and the old Buffs was good enough for

me, and I took the left. When we'd fixed our places up nicely and

charged magazines, the Yank slips back to our fire and plunks the bag

of cartridges down in the middle. Then we waited what seemed like a

year.

"Bang!" from the fire.

"At 'em, my hearties!" roared the Naval Brigade; "broadside

fire--don't lay on the whisky--well done, _Condor_!"

"Steady the Buffs," says I; "volley firing with

magazines--ready--fixed sights--at that fat old buster next the

fire--present--Fire!" and sooting the action to the word I let the old

buster have a volley in the fattest part.

The Fighting Fifth didn't make much noise, but was shooting straight

enough.

Those cartridges went off so quick, once they'd started, that I knew

they couldn't last long, so I gives 'em one more file of my magazine

and then whistles on my fingers, "Cease fire!"--pop went the last

cartridge on the fire--"Who's that silly blighter firin' after the

whistle goes?--take his name, Sergeant-Majer--Now, Buffs, fix

bayonets--prepare to charge!"

"Avast heaving, full speed ahead and ram them!" yells the Naval

Brigade. But the Boers didn't wait for that--what with the dark, and

surprise and noise, let alone a few real bullets, they had gone for

their horses and were moving hard.

"Now then, Lancers!" I holloared, "round our left flank and pursue

them to the devil!" That was just enough to prevent them turning their

heads for the first mile or so. Then our brigade reforms and went down

the hill to tally up the loot. There was half a dozen cripples, none

of them bad, half a dozen knee-haltered horses, a pot of stew on the

fire, and half a dozen black bottles. The Fighting Fifth, who was a

kind-hearted chap in his way, turned over the wounded, gave them a sup

of water, and tied them up with bits of their own shirts. The Naval

Brigade had sweated through everything it had on, barrin' its rifle,

just out of pure excitement, and it went for the bottles like a

cartload of bricks. Blessed if they weren't _Dop_![3] "Never mind,"

says the Naval Brigade, "if the quality ain't up to Admiralty pattern,

we'll have to issue a double ration"--and he did--so help me!

Meanwhile the Buffs had collected the horses and picked out a nice

little chestnut for myself. After that the Brigade fell out and

enjoyed itself.

[Footnote 3: Cape brandy, also known as "Cape smoke."]

But we couldn't waste too much time, so after half an hour we changed

saddles, packed the _dop_ in our wallets, and hoisted the Naval

Brigade on board. The whole way to Kimberley he was fighting the

_Condor_ against the combined land and sea forces of all

creation--even the Yank laughed fit to burst. I do believe Billy might

have been a commander--one can't learn langwidge like that, even in

the Navy, under a longish time.

Well, we fetched Kimberley about reveille after falling off our horses

now and then, and we gives the Sergeant-Major half a bottle to look

pleasant. Up we goes before the troop leader, who looked a bit glum at

his own written order, but cheered up when I hands over three spare

Boer horses we'd brought along.

"If I hear any more of this damfoolishness," sezee, "I'll hang the lot

of you; so you'd better take care that nobody knows of it." He's

almost as hard as the Adjy.

Well, that's why we don't say what Regiment we belong to. But just to

give the devil his jew we don't see why General French gets all the

telegrams from the Queen and Lord Mayors--and we ain't even had our

chocolate served out yet.

But this is the truth--Billy and the Yank'll both swear to it.

Yours truly,

NUMBER ONE.

* * * * *

IS THE ART OF WAR REVOLUTIONISED?

BY H. A. GWYNNE.

1.--_Infantry._

Since the days of bows and arrows the art of war has been gradually

developing. The arquebus followed the silent bow, and perhaps it may

be said that this change was the most revolutionary change ever

experienced in the history of warfare. But the arquebus could not

effectively prevent the opposing forces from coming to close quarters,

and therefore the strong man with a thorough knowledge of the use of

the _arme blanche_--be it pike, sword, or spear--was the mainstay of

their armies. With the successive introduction of the matchlock, Brown

Bess, and the host of old muzzle-loading rifles, up to the time when

the Snider rifle came into use, still the same conditions of fighting

remained. By the same conditions I mean the following:--

(1) The enemy, when firing at an effective range, was visible to the

naked eye of his opponent.

(2) Even when concealed behind cover the smoke of his rifle easily

disclosed his position.

(3) Neither the accuracy nor the rapidity of fire was sufficient to

make an attack across open ground by a slightly superior force

impossible.

The introduction of the Martini-Henry completely altered at least the

third of these conditions, but owing to the fact that no European war

of great importance was fought with Martini-Henrys, the change was not

brought home to military theorists. It is true that the Turks fought

the Greeks with the Martini and the Gras rifles, but the war was not

serious, and the Greeks never held even their entrenched positions

with sufficient tenacity to bring home to the world the fact that an

advance across the open towards an enemy under cover was becoming more

and more impossible.

But smokeless powder and the long range rifle brought with them

changes which do not appear to be properly understood. In the first

place, it may be laid down as an axiom of warfare that the area of

effective rifle fire (and indeed of any fire) is restricted by the

areas of vision. During the present war it has become evident to those

who have studied the question, that the dangerous zone of fire with

modern rifles is not, as was at first supposed, within the 1,000 yards

range, but within 1,500 or even 1,600 yards.

To advance in the open against an enemy, even when that enemy is not

under cover but simply lying on the ground, involves one of two

alternatives. Either the advancing force is annihilated by the time it

gets to within 500 yards of the enemy, or it is forced to lie down

1,500 yards away or less and return the enemy's fire. But the latter

alternative produces a state of things which has never been known in

the history of war. Both the advancing and the expectant forces are

put out of action. Neither can advance and, what is more serious

still, neither can _retire_.

This contingency opened up an entirely new field of tactics. The

general who can, with a smaller force, succeed in putting out of

action, at least for the time being, a greater force of his opponent,

is more likely to win his battle. In the future, the curious sight

will be seen of regiments or even brigades lying flat on the ground,

doing little damage to the enemy and suffering little loss, and yet

being as useless to their general as if they were snoring in their

barracks at home. Perhaps this is too sweeping, for their presence in

front of the enemy will have the advantage of containing him, but in

the open, across which an enemy has to advance, a containing force of

a proportion of one man to five of the enemy is quite sufficient.

Therefore the use of a brigade to contain a brigade would be a waste

of material. Even those of us who have followed closely and carefully

all the stages of the campaign do not yet perceive the magnitude of

the changes involved by the use of modern rifles, but they appear to

me to be so radical that instead of describing them as fresh

developments, I would prefer to give an affirmative answer to the

title of this article.

But there yet remains to be discussed the question of the _arme

blanche_--the bayonet, the weapon with which our gallant army has won

so many of its victories. I have heard not a few officers declare that

this war will be known in history as the last war in which a British

soldier carried a bayonet. But is the discarding of the bayonet to be

one of the results of the use of the new rifle and the smokeless

powder? When fighting against an enemy who does not carry it, the

force which is armed with a bayonet has a tremendous moral

superiority. In the present war, there have been one or two

cases--one, particularly, at Slingersfontein--where the Boer has made

a frontal attack on a prepared position held by us. The attacks have

always been made along the tops of kopjes which afforded excellent

cover for a stealthy advance. The obvious way to meet such attacks was

to wait until the enemy came close enough to allow the use of the

bayonet, and this was done with great success at Slingersfontein. So

that it may be laid down that in cases where one only of two opposing

forces is armed with the bayonet, it is obviously to its advantage

that the enemy should in attacking come to close quarters.

It is, equally, to the manifest advantage of the defending force, if

unarmed with the bayonet, to prevent, with heavy rifle fire, the

enemy from being able to use the bayonet. But in my humble opinion,

the bayonet will not be discarded for a long time. In the first place,

the best tactician in the world cannot always prevent, even with

modern rifles, such things as surprises, and small bodies of men might

still, even under the new conditions, be able to get unperceived into

close quarters with the enemy. But the greatest reason for its

retention is that night attacks are still possible, and in night

attacks the bayonet is undoubtedly the weapon to be used. The very

mention, however, of night attacks opens up a long vista of discussion

and arguments which I do not wish to raise. I am aware that there are

many prominent soldiers who will have nothing to say to night attacks

and condemn them lock, stock and barrel, but they can never be

eliminated from the already long list of the contingencies of warfare.

Until something is mooted which will render night attacks absolutely

impossible, so long will the bayonet be retained.

But perhaps the most radical changes effected by the use of the long

range rifle will be in purely regimental organisation. A company now

extends for the attack over a space of over half a mile. The ordinary

complement of officers assigned to a company can never hope to control

the whole of it. What is the remedy? And how are we to bring up

ammunition to the firing line, or carry away our wounded from it? Can

a regiment extended for the attack eight paces apart act as a

regiment, or in the future is the company to be the biggest infantry

unit in action? All these questions spring from the experiences of the

present campaign, and it is to be hoped that they will be answered by

those whose experience in the many engagements against the enemy will

give value and force to their words.

* * * * *

FROM ENSLIN TO BOBSFONTEIN.

BY H. PREVOST BATTERSBY.

Received orders at 10 a.m. to proceed at once to Ram Dam and to join

the main column as soon as possible. Requisitioned for transport

immediately and supplied at 6 p.m. with about four dozen small

dilapidated hair trunks, misnamed mules, which looked as if they

required three square meals rolled into one, and a fortnight in bed!

No self-respecting cat would have looked at them twice, even cold on a

wooden skewer!

Made a disastrous stand at 8 p.m., as we succeeded in losing our way

in the record time of fifteen minutes, thanks to having no guide and

to a flighty and uncertain young moon, which insisted on playing hide

and seek at the most awkward times. However, we struck the wire at

last, not the barbed variety fortunately, and had brief periods of

comparatively smooth going, variegated by such trifling mishaps as a

broken trace, falling mule, or mule and harness so mixed up that we

couldn't distinguish which was harness and which was mule and

requiring careful sorting out! Veldt stones were also somewhat

inconvenient, as they vary in size to anything above or below a

Pickford van. However, it was a fine night and the mules almost seemed

to warm to their work, racing along in great style at fully three

miles an hour on a smoothish bit of road and appreciably downhill!

What rapture to be out on the starry veldt and to have left that

Enslin "News"--the transport lines--miles (five and a doubtful bit)

behind us. Shortly afterwards the moon again appeared, and we

proceeded to negotiate a very promising nullah with gently sloping

sides. Full speed ahead and up we go, but, alas! the latter part of

our programme was somewhat disarranged, like Labby's furniture at

Northampton, owing to the fact that buck waggons and mule transport

are not adapted to racing through a truckload of sand of uncertain

depth but of certain difficulty! However, "man the wheels and shove

behind" was the natural sequence of events, and when the mules ceased

pulling in every direction except the right one from sheer exhaustion,

a few judicious cracks of the sjambok, together with a few different

languages, mostly bad, and up we eventually did go.

A wide stretch of perfectly flat veldt lay before us, and we shortly

lost both moon and wire simultaneously. Some one suggested "follow the

track": valuable advice, but difficult to carry out, as there happened

to be about fourteen of them, and all in different directions.

Pleasant predicament to be in: 1 a.m., cloudy sky, and lost on the

anything but trackless veldt! Feel about as comfortable as the man who

was going to be hanged at 8 a.m. Finally decided to proceed at right

angles, and return our wrong way if necessary, and succeeded in

finding that precious wire at last. Persistency is the road to

success, but what about an old hen sitting on a china egg?

Moon on the wane, but reached Ram Dam at 3 a.m., and all of us

surprised and delighted to get there, as it would have very shortly

been a case of the "light that failed!" Ram Dam itself looks like a

remarkably _low_ Thames somewhere near the Isle of Dogs, but glad to

get anywhere, and ready to eat or drink anything.

* * * * *

G. W. STEEVENS.

BY LIONEL JAMES.

(_With an Original Verse by Rudyard Kipling._[4])

[Footnote 4: Copyrighted in England and America, used here by

permission.]

Through war and pestilence, red siege and fire,

Silent and self-contained he drew his breath.

Too brave for show of courage--his desire

Truth as he saw it, even to the death.

RUDYARD KIPLING.

There is a pretty little cypress grove nestling under the shadow of

one of the Ladysmith defences. A peaceful oasis--green where the land

is parched and dry. It is God's acre. Before shaking the dust of

Ladysmith from off my feet for ever, I turned my pony's head towards

the green. The little animal seemed to know the way, and well he

should, for the melancholy journey to the cemetery had been frequent

during the latter period of the siege. I tied the pony to the rail and

passed in under the shadow of the cypresses. The interior of the

enclosure was one stretch of new-turned earth. The turf seemed all

exhausted. The dainty cemetery of three months ago had now the

appearance of a badly harrowed field. In places a rough cross marked

the last resting-place of the victims of war and pestilence, a few had

the names just scrawled upon a chip of wood; the majority lay

unnamed--the price of Empire keeping: a nameless grave!

I passed down the clay trodden pathway. The brief legends

ran--Egerton, Lafone, Watson, Field, Dalzel, Dick-Cunyngham, Digby

Jones, Adams--but why name them? They were all men whom three months

ago I had called my friends. Then I found the spot for which I

searched--a plain wooden cross inscribed G. W. Steevens, and a date.

What an end--six feet of Ladysmith's miserable soil! It was too cruel.

My memory carried me back to the brave companion and upright colleague

who was gone, and to the manner of his death--the man who had raced

with the Cameron Highlanders for Mahmoud's zareba; who had stood with

his hands in his pockets when it seemed that it must be but a matter

of minutes before Wad Helu swallowed up Macdonald's Soudanese brigade.

The man who had scorned death on Elandslaagte's crest lay there a

victim to pestilential Ladysmith. If the spare frame had been as stout

as the heart which it contained, that miserable rat-hole could not

have brought about the end. Poor Steevens--how he strove to live! For

a month he lay and fought the battle for life. And then when all

seemed well, and we looked for the day that we should have him back

again, he quietly faded under a relapse.

Doctors could do no more, and at four in the afternoon of the fatal

day it was evident that the end was near. Maud, who had nursed him

with a devotion unsurpassed, was deputed to break the news. He came to

the bedside and suggested that Steevens should dictate a wire to his

people at home. The patient looked up suddenly, and in a moment was

conscious of the sinister purport of the request. The conversation

which ensued was something of the following:--

"Is it the end?"

Maud nodded assent.

"Will it be soon?"

Again Maud nodded assent.

Steevens turned wearily, and remarked, "Well, it is a strange sideway

out!" Then there passed over his face an expression which plainly

read, "I will not die!"

He turned to Maud and said, almost gaily, "Let's have a drink."

Maud opened a new bottle of champagne and poured out half a glass.

Steevens sipped it, and noticing that Maud had no glass, remarked,

"You are not drinking!"

He seemed better after the wine, and when the last message was

dictated he was still struggling for life; but the disease had the

upper hand, and he sank into unconsciousness which was never broken

until he passed away in the evening.

We buried him at midnight. As we took him down to the cypress grove,

it seemed that the enemy paid tribute to our sorrow, for their

searchlight played full upon the mournful cavalcade as it wound into

the open.

* * * * *

SHOULD BEARDS BE WORN IN WAR?

BLOEMFONTEIN, _March 23, 1900_.

DEAR SIR,--A distinguished General Officer--who is also an exceedingly

clever man--was issuing orders on one occasion. "I have no wish," said

he, "to interfere with the time-honoured Custom which ordains that

heroes may be dirty; but, until they become heroes, I see no reason

why they should not try and look like soldiers. The troops under my

command will, therefore, shave until they arrive at the actual front."

This witty sentence provides me with an admirable text for a sermon on

a subject very near my heart. Our troops have, indeed, proved

themselves heroes. Whatever may be the opinion expressed now and

hereafter upon many things in the conduct of this war, upon one thing

there can be no dissentient voice--I refer to the splendid heroism of

our troops. Yes, sir, they are heroes. But why, oh! why do they not

try and look like soldiers too? Why should the erstwhile smart

Guardsman, the dandy Highlander, the dapper Horseman, adopt the facial

disguise of a poacher out of luck, or rather--for the beard is not a

good one--of a member of the criminal classes previous to the Saturday

evening's ablutions? Surely soap can be purchased, razors ground, and

water heated.

It is universally admitted that one of the chief duties of a soldier

is to be smart in his appearance, and the fact that on active service

there may be some difficulty is surely no excuse for its neglect. In

all other periods of the world's history shaving was looked upon as

one of the chiefest necessities in time of war. Napoleon's Old Guard

shaved, as is well known, throughout the entire retreat from Moscow;

there was not a hair upon the faces of Hannibal's legions the day

after the famous crossing of the Alps, while Caesar's well-known

order, "Ut barbas tondeant," must be familiar to every schoolboy. I

might come down to our own times and quote the Queen's Regulations,

but I refrain from doing so lest I should be accused of priggishness.

It is, I do not hesitate to say, horrible to me to see the unkempt

appearance of those who might be--and are at other times--the

finest-looking troops in the world. I feel inclined to say, in the

words of Scripture, "Tarry ye at Jericho until (and after) your beards

be grown."

I hope, sir, you will forgive this somewhat lengthy letter, but the

subject is, as I have said already, very near my heart. No one ever

has looked well in a beard, and no one ever will, and until our

officers recognise this fact and set an example of spruceness for

their men to follow, the army in South Africa must remain an eyesore

to all who share the opinions of

Your obedient servant,

FIELD OFFICER.

War's Brighter Side The Story of The Friend Newspaper Edited by the Correspondents with Lord Roberts's Forces, March-April, 1900 · 第 7 / 27 章