VII

This last impression had indeed everything to gain from the sad rigour

of steps retraced, an inevitable return to the North (in the interest of

a directly subsequent, and thereby gracelessly roundabout, move

Westward); and I confess to having felt on that occasion, before the

dire backwardness of the Northern spring, as if I had, while travelling

in the other sense, but blasphemed against the want of forwardness of

the Southern. Every breath that one might still have drawn in the

South—might if twenty other matters had been different—haunted me as the

thought of a lost treasure, and I settled, at the eternal car-window, to

the mere sightless contemplation, the forlorn view, of an ugly—ah, such

an ugly, wintering, waiting world. My eye had perhaps been jaundiced by

the breach of a happy spell—inasmuch as on thus leaving the sad

fragments there where they had fallen I tasted again the quite

saccharine sweetness of my last experience of Palm Beach, and knew how I

should wish to note for remembrance the passage, supremely charged with

that quality, in which it had culminated. I asked myself what other

expression I should find for the incident, the afternoon before I left

the place, of one of those mild progresses to the head of Lake Worth

which distil, for the good children of the Pair, the purest poetry of

their cup. The poetic effect had braved the compromising aid of the

highly-developed electric launch in which the pilgrim embarks, and

braved as well the immitigable fact that his shrine, at the end of a

couple of hours, is, in the vast and exquisite void, but an institution

of yesterday, a wondrous floating tea-house or restaurant, inflated

again with the hotel-spirit and exhaling modernity at every pore.

These associations are—so far as association goes—the only ones; but the

whole impression, for simply sitting there in the softest lap the whole

South had to offer, seemed to me to dispense with any aid but that of

its own absolute felicity. It was, for the late return at least, the

return in the divine dusk, with the flushed West at one’s right, a

concert of but two or three notes—the alignment, against the golden sky,

of the individual black palms, a frieze of chiselled ebony, and the

texture, for faintly-brushed cheek and brow, of an air of such silkiness

of velvet, the very throne-robe of the star-crowned night, as one can

scarce commemorate but in the language of the loom. The shore of the

sunset and the palms, what was that, meanwhile, like, and yet with what

did it, at the moment one asked the question, refuse to have anything to

do? It was like a myriad pictures of the Nile; with much of the modern

life of which it suggested more than one analogy. These indeed all

dropped, I found, before I had done—it would have been a Nile so

simplified out of the various fine senses attachable. One had to put the

case, I mean, to _make_ a fine sense, that here surely then was the

greater antiquity of the two, the antiquity of the infinite _previous_,

of the time, before Pharaohs and Pyramids, when everything was still to

come. It was a Nile, in short, without the least little implication of a

Sphinx or, still more if possible, of a Cleopatra. I had the foretaste

of what I was presently to feel in California—when the general aspect of

that wondrous realm kept suggesting to me a sort of prepared but

unconscious and inexperienced Italy, the primitive _plate_, in perfect

condition, but with the impression of History all yet to be made.

Of how grimly, meanwhile, under the annual rigour, the world, for the

most part, waits to be less ugly again, less despoiled of interest, less

abandoned to monotony, less forsaken of the presence that forms its only

resource, of the one friend to whom it owes all it ever gets, of the

pitying season that shall save it from its huge insignificance—of so

much as this, no doubt, I sufficiently renewed my vision, and with

plenty of the reviving ache of a question already familiar. To what

extent was hugeness, to what extent _could_ it be, a ground for

complacency of view, in any country not visited for the very love of

wildness, for positive joy in barbarism? Where was the charm of

boundless immensity as overlooked from a car-window?—with the general

pretension to charm, the general conquest of nature and space, affirmed,

immediately round about you, by the general pretension of the Pullman,

the great monotonous rumble of which seems forever to say to you: “See

what I’m making of all this—see what I’m making, what I’m making!” I was

to become later on still more intimately aware of the spirit of one’s

possible reply to that, but even then my consciousness served, and the

eloquence of my exasperation seems, in its rude accents, to come back to

me.

“I see what you are _not_ making, oh, what you are ever so vividly not;

and how can I help it if I am subject to that lucidity?—which appears

never so welcome to you, for its measure of truth, as it ought to be!

How can I not be so subject, from the moment I don’t just irreflectively

gape? If I were one of the painted savages you have dispossessed, or

even some tough reactionary trying to emulate him, what you are making

would doubtless impress me more than what you are leaving unmade; for in

that case it wouldn’t be to _you_ I should be looking in any degree for

beauty or for charm. Beauty and charm would be for me in the solitude

you have ravaged, and I should owe you my grudge for every disfigurement

and every violence, for every wound with which you have caused the face

of the land to bleed. No, since I accept your ravage, what strikes me is

the long list of the arrears of your undone; and so constantly, right

and left, that your pretended message of civilization is but a colossal

recipe for the _creation_ of arrears, and of such as can but remain

forever out of hand. You touch the great lonely land—as one feels it

still to be—only to plant upon it some ugliness about which, never

dreaming of the grace of apology or contrition, you then proceed to brag

with a cynicism all your own. You convert the large and noble sanities

that I see around me, you convert them one after the other to crudities,

to invalidities, hideous and unashamed; and you so leave them to add to

the number of the myriad aspects you simply spoil, of the myriad

unanswerable questions that you scatter about as some monstrous

unnatural mother might leave a family of unfathered infants on doorsteps

or in waiting-rooms. This is the meaning surely of the inveterate rule

that you shall multiply the perpetrations you call ‘places’—by the sign

of some name as senseless, mostly, as themselves—to the sole end of

multiplying to the eye, as one approaches, every possible source of

displeasure. When nobody cares or notices or suffers, by all one makes

out, when no displeasure, by what one can see, is ever felt or ever

registered, why shouldn’t you, you may indeed ask, be as much in your

right as you need? But in that fact itself, that fact of the vast

general unconsciousness and indifference, looms, for any restless

analyst who may come along, the accumulation, on your hands, of the

unretrieved and the irretrievable!”

I remember how it was to come to me elsewhere, in such hours as those,

that south of Pennsylvania, for instance, or beyond the radius of

Washington, I had caught no glimpse of anything that was to be called,

for more than a few miles and by a stretch of courtesy, the honour, the

decency or dignity of a road—that most exemplary of all civil creations,

and greater even as a note of morality, one often thinks, than as a note

of facility; and yet had nowhere heard these particular arrears spoken

of as matters ever conceivably to be made up. I was doubtless aware that

if I had been a beautiful red man with a tomahawk I should of course

have rejoiced in the occasional sandy track, or in the occasional

mud-channel, just in proportion as they fell so short of the type. Only

in that case I shouldn’t have been seated by the great square of

plate-glass through which the missionary Pullman appeared to invite me

to admire the achievements it proclaimed. It was in this respect the

great symbolic agent; it seemed to stand for all the irresponsibility

behind it; and I am not sure that I didn’t continue, so long as I was in

it, to “slang” it for relief of the o’erfraught heart. “You deal your

wounds—that is the ‘trouble,’ as you say—in numbers so out of proportion

to any hint of responsibility for them that you seem ever moved to take;

which is the devil’s dance, precisely, that your vast expanse of level

floor leads you to caper through with more kinds of outward

clumsiness—even if also with more kinds of inward impatience and

avidity, more leaps and bounds of the spirit at any cost to grace—than

have ever before been collectively displayed. The expanse of the floor,

the material opportunity itself, has elsewhere failed; so that what is

the positive effect of their inordinate presence but to make the lone

observer, here and there, but measure with dismay the trap laid by the

scale, if he be not tempted even to say by the superstition, of

continuity? Is the germ of anything finely human, of anything agreeably

or successfully social, supposably planted in conditions of such endless

stretching and such boundless spreading as shall appear finally to

minister but to the triumph of the superficial and the apotheosis of the

raw? Oh for a split or a chasm, one groans beside your plate-glass, oh

for an unbridgeable abyss or an insuperable mountain!”—and I could so

indulge myself though still ignorant of how one was to groan later on,

in particular, after taking yet further home the portentous truth that

this same criminal continuity, scorning its grandest chance to break

down, makes but a mouthful of the mighty Mississippi. That was to be in

fact my very next “big” impression.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

RICHARD CLAY & SONS, LIMITED,

BREAD STREET HILL, E.C., AND

BUNGAY, SUFFOLK.

The American scene · 第 63 / 70 题