THE INNER HISTORY OF THE WATERLOO CAMPAIGN

The actual fighting phase of this memorable campaign was confined to

the four days from the 15th to the 18th of June, both days inclusive.

The literature concerning itself with that period would make a library

of itself. Scarcely a military writer of any European nation but has

delivered himself on the subject, from Clausewitz to General Maurice,

from Berton to Brialmont. Thiers, Alison, and Hooper may be cited of

the host of civilian writers whom the theme has enticed to description

and criticism. There is scarcely a point in the brief vivid drama that

has not furnished a topic for warm and sustained controversy; and the

cult of the Waterloo campaign is more assiduous to-day than when the

participators in the great strife were testifying to their own

experiences.

Quite recently an important work dealing chiefly with the inner history

of the campaign has come to us from the other side of the Atlantic.

[Footnote: _The Campaign of Waterloo: a Military History_. By John

Codman Ropes. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. February 1893.] Its

author, Mr. John Ropes, is a civilian gentleman of Boston, who has

devoted his life to military study. He has given years to the

elucidation of the problems of the Waterloo campaign, has trodden every

foot of its ground, and has burrowed for recondite matter in the

military archives of divers nations. A citizen of the American

Republic, he is free alike from national prejudices and national

prepossessions; if he is perhaps not uniformly correct in his

inferences, his rigorous impartiality is always conspicuous. By his

research and acute perception he has let light in upon not a few

obscurities; and it may be pertinent briefly to summarise the inner

history of the campaign, giving what may seem their due weight to the

arguments and representations of the American writer.

The following were the respective positions on the 14th of

June:--Wellington's heterogeneous army, about 94,000 strong with 196

guns, lay widely dispersed in cantonments from the Scheldt to the

Charleroi-Brussels chaussée, its front extending from Tournay through

Mons and Binche to Nivelles and Quatre Bras. Of the Prussian army under

Blücher, about 121,000 strong with 312 guns, one corps was at Liège,

another near the Meuse above Namur, a third at Namur, and Ziethen's in

advance holding the line of the Sambre. The mass of Blücher's command

had already seen service and, with the exception of the Saxons, was

full of zeal; the corps were well commanded, and their chief, although

he had his limits, was a thorough soldier. The French army, consisting

of five corps d'armée, the Guard, four cavalry corps and 344

guns--total fighting strength 124,500--Napoleon had succeeded in

assembling with wonderful celerity and secrecy south of the Sambre

within an easy march of Charleroi. Its officers and soldiers were alike

veterans but its organisation was somewhat defective. Napoleon scarcely

preserved the phenomenal force of earlier years; but, in Mr. Ropes's

words, he disclosed "no conspicuous lack of energy and activity." Soult

was far from being an ideal chief of staff. Ney, to whom was assigned

the command of the left wing, only reached the army on the 15th, and

without a staff; Grouchy, to whom on the 16th was suddenly given the

command of the right wing, was not a man of high military capacity.

Napoleon's plan of campaign was founded on the circumstance that the

bases of the allied armies lay in opposite directions--the English base

on the German Ocean, the Prussian through Liège and Maestricht to the

Rhine. The military probability was that if either army was forced to

retreat, it would retreat towards its base; and to do this would be to

march away from its ally. Napoleon was in no situation to manoeuvre

leisurely, with all Europe on the march against him. His engrossing aim

was to gain immediate victory over his adversaries in Belgium before

the Russians and Austrians should close in around him. His expectation

was that Blücher would offer battle about Fleurus and be overwhelmed

before the Anglo-Dutch army could come to the support of its Prussian

ally. To make sure of preventing that junction the Emperor's intention

was to detail Ney with the left wing to reach and hold Quatre Bras. The

Prussians thoroughly beaten, drifting rearward toward their base, and

reduced to a condition of comparative inoffensiveness, he would then

turn on Wellington and force him to give battle.

Mr. Ropes refutes the contention maintained by a great array of

authorities, that Napoleon's design was to "wedge himself into the

interval between the allied armies" by seizing simultaneously Sombreffe

and Quatre Bras, in order to cut the communication between the two

armies and then defeat them in succession. Against this view he

successfully marshals Napoleon himself, Wellington by the mouth of Lord

Ellesmere, and the great German strategist Clausewitz. It will suffice

to quote Napoleon:--

The Emperor's intention was that his advance should

occupy Fleurus, the mass concealed behind this town;

he took good care ... above all things not to occupy

Sombreffe. To have done so would have caused the

failure of all his dispositions, for then the battle of Ligny

would not have been fought, and Blücher would have had

to make Wavre the concentration-point for his army.

Wellington alludes pointedly to the obvious danger to the French army

of the suggested wedge position in what the Germans call _die taktische

Mitte_, where, instead of being able to defeat the allies in

succession, it would itself be liable to be crushed between the upper

and the nether millstone.

At daybreak of the 15th Napoleon took the offensive, driving in Ziethen

on and through Charleroi although not without sharp fighting. On that

evening three French corps, the Guard, and most of the cavalry, were

concentrated about Charleroi and forward toward Fleurus, ready to

attack Blücher next day. Controversy has been very keen on the question

whether or not on the afternoon of the 15th Napoleon gave Ney verbal

orders to occupy Quatre Bras the same evening. Mr. Ropes holds it

"almost certain" that the order was given. From Napoleon's bulletin

despatched on the evening of the 15th, which is the only piece of

strictly contemporary evidence, he quotes: "Le Prince de la Moskowa

(Ney) a eu le soir son quartier général aux Quatres-Chemins;" and he

remarks that this must have been the belief in the headquarter "unless

we gratuitously invent an intention to deceive the public." There is no

need for Mr. Ropes to put that strain on himself, since the main

purport of Napoleon's bulletins notoriously was to deceive the public.

But if Napoleon had not intended that Ney should occupy Quatre Bras on

the night of the 15th, the statement that this had been done would have

been a purposeless futility; and if he had intended that Ney should do

so it is unlikely that he should have omitted to give him instructions

to that effect. Grouchy claims to have heard Napoleon censure Ney for

his omission to occupy Quatre Bras; an omission which had its

importance, for the reason, among others, that it was ominous of the

Marshal's infinitely more harmful disobedience of orders next day.

All writers agree that Blücher ordered the concentration of his army in

the fighting position previously chosen in the event of the French

advancing by Charleroi, "without," in Mr. Ropes's words, "any definite

agreement or undertaking with Wellington that he was to have English

aid in the impending battle." He was content to take his risk of the

English general's possible inability for sundry obvious reasons, to

come to his support. And while the Prussian army with the unfortunate

exception of Bülow's corps, was on the 15th moving toward the chosen

position of Ligny, where its right was to be on St. Amand, its centre

on and behind Ligny, and its left about Balâtre, what was happening in

the Anglo-Dutch army lying spread out westward of the

Charleroi--Brussels chaussée?

Wellington was at Brussels expecting the French invasion by or west of

the Mons-Brussels road, to meet which he considered his army very well

placed, but could expect no Prussian cooperation. His courier service,

with his forces so dispersed, should have been well organised and

alert, but it was neither; and Napoleon's secrecy and suddenness in

taking the offensive were worthy of his best days. It has been freely

imputed to Wellington that he was thereby in a measure surprised. There

is the strange and probably mythical story in the work professing to be

Fouché's _Memoirs_ to the effect that Wellington was relying on him for

information of Napoleon's plans, and that he--Fouché--played the

English commander false. "On the very day of Napoleon's departure from

Paris," say the _Memoirs_, "I despatched Madame D----, furnished with

notes in cipher, narrating the whole plan of the campaign. But at the

same time I privately sent orders for such obstacles at the frontier,

where she was to pass, that she could not reach Wellington's

headquarters till after the event. This was the real explanation of the

inactivity of the British generalissimo which excited such universal

astonishment." Readers of the _Letters of the First Earl of Malmesbury_

will remember the apparently authentic statement of Captain Bowles,

that Wellington, rising from the supper-table at the famous ball,

whispered to ask the Duke of Richmond if he had a good

map. The Duke of Richmond said he had, and took

Wellington into his dressing-room. Wellington shut the

door and said, "Napoleon has humbugged me, by God;

he has gained twenty-four hours' march on me.... I

have ordered the army to concentrate at Quatre Bras;

but we shall not stop him there, and if so I must fight

him _there_" (passing his thumb-nail over the position of

Waterloo). The conversation was repeated to me by the

Duke of Richmond two minutes after it occurred.

Facts, however, are stronger evidence than words; and this confession

on Wellington's part is inconsistent with the circumstance that he had

not hurried to retrieve the time he is represented as having owned that

Napoleon had gained on him--that he had, on the contrary, allowed his

adversary to gain several hours more. Wellington's combination of

caution and decision throughout this momentous period is a very

interesting study. It was not until 3 P.M. (of the 15th) that there

reached him tidings almost simultaneously of firing between the

outposts about Thuin and that Ziethen had been attacked before

Charleroi, the two places ten miles apart and both occurrences in the

early morning. Those affairs might have been casual outpost skirmishes;

and the Duke, in anticipation of further information, took no measures

for some hours. At length, in default of later tidings he determined on

the precautionary step of assembling his divisions at their respective

rendezvous points in readiness to march; further specifically directing

a concentration of 25,000 men at Nivelles on his then left flank, when

it should have been ascertained for certain that the enemy's line of

attack was by Charleroi. These orders were sent out early in the

evening--"between 5 and 7." Later in the evening came a letter from

Blücher announcing the concentration of the Prussian army to occupy the

Ligny fighting position, in which disposition Wellington acquiesced;

but, still uncertain of Napoleon's true line of attack--his conviction

being, as is well known, that Napoleon should have moved on the British

right--he would not definitely fix the point of ultimate concentration

of his army until he should receive intelligence from Mons. But

Blücher's tidings caused him to issue about 10 P.M. a second set of

orders, commanding a general movement of the army, not as yet to any

specific point of concentration but in prescribed directions towards

its left (eastward). At length, when the news came from Mons that he

need have no further serious solicitude about his right since the whole

French army was advancing by Charleroi, he saw his way clear. Towards

midnight, writes Müffling the Prussian Commissioner at his

headquarters, Wellington informed him of the tidings from Mons, and

added: "The orders for the concentration of my army at Nivelles and

Quatre Bras are already despatched. Let us, therefore, go to the ball."

There are three definite evidences that before midnight of the 15th

Wellington had resolved to concentrate about Quatre Bras, and had

issued final orders accordingly--his statement to the Duke of Richmond,

his statement to Müffling, and his statement in his official report to

Lord Bathurst. Yet Mr. Ropes believes that his decision to that effect

"could not have been arrived at very long before he left Brussels" on

the morning of the 16th, which he did "probably about half-past seven."

He founds this belief on two orders dated "16th June" sent to Lord Hill

in the early morning of that day, in which there is no allusion to a

concentration at Quatre Bras. But those were merely supplementary

instructions as to points of detail; for example, one of them enjoined

that a division ordered earlier to Enghien should move instead by way

of Braine le Comte, that being a nearer route toward the final general

destination of Quatre Bras specified in the earlier (the "towards

midnight") orders. The latter orders are not extant, having been lost

according to Gurwood, with De Lancey's papers when he fell at Waterloo;

but that they must have been issued is proved by the fact that they

were acted upon by the troops; and that they were issued before

midnight of the 15th is made clear by Wellington's three specific

statements to that effect.

When the Duke left Brussels for the front on the morning of the 16th he

took with him a singularly optimistic paper styled "Disposition of the

British Army at 7 A.M., 16th June," which was "written out for the

information of the Commander of the Forces by Colonel Sir W. de

Lancey," his Quartermaster-General. In the nature of things for the

most part guess-work, the wish as regarded almost every particular set

out in this document was father to the thought. Wellington was no doubt

reasonably justified in accepting and relying on this flattering

"Disposition;" but its terms, as Mr. Ropes conclusively shows, simply

misled him and caused him also unconsciously to mislead Blücher, both

by the expressions of the letter written by him to that chief on his

arrival at Quatre Bras and later when he met the Prussian commander at

the mill of Brye. Wellington was indeed trebly fortunate in finding the

Quatre Bras position still available to him--fortunate that Ney on the

previous evening had defaulted from his orders in refraining from

occupying it; fortunate that Ney still on this morning was remaining

passive; and more fortunate still that it had been occupied, defended,

and reinforced by Dutch-Belgian troops not only without orders from him

but in bold and happy violation of his orders. Perponcher's division

was scarcely a potent representative of the Anglo-Dutch army, but there

was nothing more at hand; and pending the coming up of reinforcements

Wellington, with rather a sanguine reliance on Ney's maintenance of

inactivity, rode over to Brye and had a conversation with Blücher.

There are contradictory accounts of its tenor, and Gneisenau certainly

seems to have formed the impression that the Duke gave a positive

pledge of support. Mr. Ropes considers that, misled by the erroneous

"Disposition," Wellington honestly believed he would be able to

co-operate with Blücher, and that he "certainly did give that commander

some assurance of support by the Anglo-Dutch army in the impending

battle." Müffling, who was present, states that the Duke's last words

were: "Well, I will come, provided I am not attacked myself;" and this

probably was the final undertaking. Wellington's words were in

accordance with the caution of his character; and it is certain that

Blücher had decided to fight at Ligny whether assured or not of his

brother-commander's support. That Wellington regarded Blücher's

dispositions for battle as objectionable is proved by his blunt comment

to Hardinge--"If they fight here they will be damnably licked!"

It would have been possible for Napoleon to have crushed the Prussian

army in the early hours of the 16th when it was in the throes of

formation for battle; and this he would probably have done if Ney had

occupied Quatre Bras on the previous evening. But in Ney's default of

accomplishing this Napoleon, in his solicitude that Wellington should

be hindered from supporting Blücher, determined to delay his own stroke

against the latter until Ney should be in possession of Quatre Bras

with the left wing, where, in Soult's words, "he ought to be able to

destroy any force of the enemy that might present itself," and then

come to the support of the Emperor by getting on the Prussian rear

behind St. Amand. Napoleon's instructions were explicit that Ney was to

march on Quatre Bras, take position there, and then send an infantry

division and Kellerman's cavalry to points eastward, whence the Emperor

might summon them to participate in his own operations. If Ney had

fulfilled his orders by utilising the whole force at his disposal, in

all human probability he would have defeated Wellington at Quatre Bras,

whose troops, arriving in detail, would have been crushed by greatly

superior numbers as they came up. As it was, although at the beginning

of the battle he was in superior strength, Ney never utilised more than

22,000 men; whereas by its close Wellington had 31,000, and, thanks to

the stanchness of the British infantry, was the victor in a very

hard-fought contest. But Mr. Ropes has reason in holding it humanly

certain that he would have been beaten--in which case the battle of

Waterloo would never have been fought--had not D'Erlon's corps of Ney's

command while marching towards Quatre Bras, been turned aside in the

direction of the Prussian right.

In the justifiable belief that Ney was duly carrying out his orders

Napoleon at half-past one opened the battle of Ligny. He had expected

to have to deal with but a single Prussian corps, but the actual fact

was that, while he had 74,000 men on the field, Blücher had 87,000 with

a superior strength of artillery. The fighting was long and severe.

From the first, recognising the defects of his adversary's position,

Napoleon was satisfied that he could defeat the Prussian army. But he

needed to do more--to crush, to rout it, so that he need give himself

no further concern regarding it. This he saw his way to accomplish if

Ney were to strike in presently on the Prussian right; and so, with

intent to stir that chief to vigorous enterprise, the message was sent

him that "the fate of France was in his hands." The battle proceeded,

Blücher throwing in his reserves freely, Napoleon chary of his and

playing the waiting game pending Ney's expected co-operation. About

half-past five he was preparing to put in the Guard and strike the

decisive blow, when information reached him from his right that a

column, presumably hostile, was visible some two miles distant marching

toward Fleurus. Napoleon sent an aide to ascertain the facts and until

his return postponed the decisive moment. Two hours later the

information was brought back that the approaching column was D'Erlon's

from Ney's wing. This intelligence dispelled all anxiety. Strangely

enough, no instructions were sent to the approaching reinforcement, and

the suspended stroke was promptly dealt. The Prussians, after desperate

fighting, were everywhere driven back. Napoleon with part of the

Imperial Guard broke Blücher's centre, and the French army deployed on

the heights beyond the stream. In a word, Napoleon had defeated the

Prussians, but had neither crushed nor routed them. There was no

pursuit.

D'Erlon's corps on this afternoon had achieved the doubly sinister

distinction of having prevented Ney from gaining a probable victory at

Quatre Bras, and of detracting from the thoroughness of Napoleon's

actual victory at Ligny. While it was leisurely marching towards

Frasnes in support of Ney, it was diverted eastward towards the

Prussian right flank in consequence of an order given (whether

authorised or not is uncertain) by an aide-de-camp of the Emperor. It

was about to deploy for action, when, on receiving from Ney a

peremptory order to rejoin his command; and in absence of a command

from Napoleon to strike the Prussian flank, it went about and tramped

back towards Frasnes. D'Erlon's promenade was as futile as the famous

march of the King of France up the hill and then down again.

Mr. Ropes considers that on the morning of the 17th Napoleon had thus

far in the main fulfilled his programme. This view may be questioned.

He had merely defeated two of the four Prussian corps; he had not

wrecked Blücher. He had failed to occupy Quatre Bras; the Anglo-Dutch

army had succeeded in effecting a partial concentration and in

repulsing his left wing there. Still it must be admitted that with two

corps absolutely intact and with no serious losses in the Guard and

cavalry, Napoleon was in good shape for carrying out his plan. If Ney

had sent him word overnight that Wellington's army was bivouacking

about Quatre Bras in ignorance, as it turned out, of the result of

Ligny, he might have attacked it to good purpose in conjunction with

Ney in the early morning of the 17th. But Ney was silent and sulky;

Napoleon himself was greatly fatigued, and Soult was of no service to

him.

During the night the Prussians "had folded their tents like the Arabs,

and as silently stolen away." They had neither been watched nor

followed up, all touch of them had been lost, and there was nothing to

indicate their line of retreat. This slovenliness on the part of the

French would not have occurred in Napoleon's earlier days; nor in those

days of greater vigour would he have delayed until after midday of the

17th to follow up an army which he had defeated on the previous

evening, and which had disappeared from before him in the course of the

night. The reports which had been sent in from a cavalry reconnaissance

despatched in the morning indicated that the Prussians were retiring on

Namur. No reconnaissance had been made in the direction of Tilly and

Wavre. This was a strange error, since Blücher had two corps still

untouched, and as above everything a fighting man, was not likely to

throw up his hands and forsake his ally after one partial discomfiture.

Napoleon tardily determined to despatch Grouchy on the errand of

following up the Prussians with a force consisting of about 33,000 men

with ninety-six guns. Thus far all authorities are agreed; but as

regards the character of the orders given to Grouchy for his guidance

in an obviously somewhat complicated enterprise, there is an

extraordinary contrariety of evidence. It is stated in the _St. Helena

Memoirs_ that Grouchy received positive orders to keep himself always

between the main French army and Blücher; to maintain constant

communication with the former and in a position easily to rejoin it;

that since it was possible that Blücher might retreat on Wavre, he

(Grouchy) was to be there simultaneously; if the Prussians should

continue their march on Brussels and should pass the night in the

forest of Soignies, he was to follow to the edge of the forest; should

they retire on the Meuse, he was to watch them with part of his cavalry

and himself occupy Wavre with the mass of his force, where he should be

in position for easy communication with Napoleon's headquarters. Those

orders are certainly specific enough, but there is no record of them;

and they may be assumed to represent rather what Napoleon at St. Helena

considered Grouchy should have done, than what he was actually ordered

to do.

Grouchy's version, again--and it is adequately corroborated--is to the

effect that about midday of the 17th on the field of Ligny, the Emperor

gave him the verbal order to take the 3rd and 4th Corps and certain

cavalry and "go in pursuit of the Prussians." Grouchy raised sundry

objections which the Emperor overruled and repeated his commands,

adding that "it was for me (Grouchy) to discover the route taken by

Blücher; that he himself was going to fight the English, and that it

was for me to complete the defeat of the Prussians by attacking them as

soon as I should have caught up with them." So much for Grouchy for the

moment.

Soon after the Emperor had given Grouchy this verbal order, tidings

came in from a scouting party that a body of Prussian troops had been

seen about 9 A.M. at Gembloux, considerably northward of the Namur

road. The abstract probability no doubt was that the Prussians would

retire towards their base. But that Napoleon kept an open mind on the

subject is evidenced by his instruction to Grouchy to "go and discover

the route taken by Blücher," and this later intelligence, it may be

assumed, opened his mind yet further. He thought it well, then, to send

to Grouchy a supplementary written order which in the temporary absence

of Marshal Soult he dictated to General Bertrand. This order enjoined

on Grouchy to proceed with his force to Gembloux; to explore in the

directions of Namur and Maestricht; to pursue the enemy; explore his

march; and report upon his manoeuvres, so that "I (Napoleon) may be

able to penetrate what the enemy is intending to do; whether he is

separating himself from the English, or whether they are intending

still to unite in trying the fate of another battle to cover Brussels

or Liège." To me I confess--and the view is also that of Chesney and

Maurice--this written order is simply an amplification in detail of the

previous verbal order, which by instructing Grouchy "to discover the

route taken by Blücher" clearly evinced doubt in Napoleon's mind as to

the Prussian line of retreat. Mr. Ropes, on the other hand, bases an

indictment on Grouchy's conduct on the argument that not only was the

tone of the written order altogether different from that of the verbal

order, but that the duty assigned to Grouchy by the former was wholly

different from that specified in the latter.

He adds that Grouchy constantly and persistently denied having received

any other than the verbal order, that in this denial Grouchy lied, and

that "the mischievous influence of this deliberate concealment of his

orders by Grouchy caused for nearly thirty years after the battle of

Waterloo to be prevalent a wholly false notion as to the task assigned

by Napoleon to the Marshal." Certainly Grouchy's conduct is

inexplicable to any one holding the belief, as I do, that there is

nothing in the written order to account for Grouchy's denial of having

received it. It is more inexplicable than Mr. Ropes appears to be aware

of. It is true, as Mr. Ropes proves, that Grouchy vehemently denied

receiving the written order in all his works printed from 1818 to 1829.

But he had actually acknowledged its receipt almost immediately after

Waterloo. In his son's little book, _Le Maréchal de Grouchy du 16me au

19me Juin, 1815,_ is printed among the _Documents Historiques Inédits_

a paper styled "Allocution du Maréchal Grouchy à quelques-uns des

officiers généraux sous les ordres, lorsqu'il eût appris les désastres

de Waterloo." From this document I make the following extract: "A few

hours later the Emperor modified his first order, and caused to be

written to me by the Grand Marshal Bertrand the order to betake myself

to Gembloux, and to send reconnaissances towards Namur. 'It is

important,' continued the order, 'to discover the intentions of the

Prussians--whether they are separating from the English, or have the

design to take the chance of a new battle.'" It is strange that this

acknowledgment should never have been cited against Grouchy; stranger

still that in the face of it he should have maintained his denials; yet

more strange that those denials were never exposed; and most strange of

all, that finally the "written order" should have appeared for the

first time in a casual article published in 1842, without evoking any

explanation from Grouchy, or any strictures on his persistent mendacity.

It may be questioned whether the force of 33,000 men entrusted to

Grouchy was not either too large or too small. The main French army, in

the possible contingencies before it, could not safely spare so large a

detachment, as events showed. Grouchy's command was not sufficiently

strong to oppose the whole Prussian army; two corps of which could

certainly have "held" it, while the other two were free to support

Wellington. Mr. Ropes thinks it might have been diminished by one-half,

but then a single Prussian corps could have dealt with it. It is

difficult to discern in what respect the 6000 cavalry assigned to

Grouchy should have been inadequate to such service as could reasonably

have been expected of his whole command.

The British force about Quatre Bras on the morning of the 17th amounted

to about 45,000 men. Early on that morning Wellington was in

conversation with the Captain Bowles previously mentioned, when an

officer galloped up and, to quote Captain Bowles,

whispered to the Duke, who then turned to me and said,

"Old Blücher has had a d----d good licking and has gone

back to Wavre. As he has gone back, we must go too. I

suppose in England they will say we have been licked--I

can't help that."

He quietly withdrew his troops from their positions, an operation which

Ney, with 40,000 men at his disposal, did not attempt to molest,

notwithstanding repeated orders from Napoleon to move on Quatre Bras.

Early in the afternoon Napoleon reached that vicinity with the Guard,

6th Corps, and Milhaud's Cuirassiers, picked up Ney's command, and

mounting his horse led the French army, following up Wellington's

retreat. His energy and activity throughout the march is described as

intense. Those characteristics he continued to evince during the

following night and in the morning of the eventful 18th. In the dead of

night he spent two hours on the picquet line, and about seven he was

out again on the foreposts in the mud and rain. His anxiety was not as

to the issue of a battle with Wellington, but lest Wellington should

not stand and fight. That apprehension was dispelled when, as he rode

along his front about 8 A.M., he saw the Anglo-Dutch army taking up its

ground. He was aware that at least one "pretty strong Prussian

column"--which actually consisted of the two corps beaten at Ligny--had

retired on Wavre. But notwithstanding the disquieting vagueness and

ineptitude of Grouchy's letter of 10 P.M. of the 17th from Gembloux,

and that up to the morning of the battle he had sent no suggestions or

instructions to that officer, he yet trusted implicitly to him to fend

off the Prussians; and it did not seem to occur to him that

Wellington's calm expectant attitude indicated his assurance of

Blücher's cooperation.

In one of the cavalry charges toward the close of the battle of Ligny,

Blücher had been overthrown, ridden over, almost taken prisoner, and

severely bruised; but the gallant old hussar was almost himself again

next morning, thanks to copious doses of gin and rhubarb, for the

effluvium of which restorative he apologised to Hardinge as he embraced

that wounded officer, in the extremely plain expression, "_Ich stinke

etwas_." Gneisenau, his Chief of Staff, rather distrusted Wellington's

good faith, and doubted whether it was not the safer policy for the

Prussian army to fall back toward Liège. But Blücher prevailed over his

lieutenants; and on the evening of the 17th all four Prussian corps in

a strength of about 90,000 men, were concentrated about Wavre, some

nine miles east of the Waterloo position, full of ardour and confident

of success. That same night Müffling informed Blücher by letter that

the Anglo-Dutch army had occupied the position named, wherein to fight

next day; and Blücher's loyal answer was that Bülow's corps at daybreak

should march by way of St. Lambert to strike the French right; that

Pirch's would follow in support; and that the other two would stand in

readiness. This communication, which reached Wellington at headquarters

at 2 A.M. of the 18th, has been held to have been the first actually

definite assurance of Prussian support. The story to the effect that on

the evening of the 17th the Duke rode over to Wavre to make sure from

Blücher's own mouth that he could rely on Prussian support next day, to

the truth of which not a little of vague testimony has been adduced,

may be now definitely disregarded. The evidence against the legend is

conclusive. An authoritative contradiction was given to it in an

article in the _Quarterly Review_ of 1842, from the pen of Lord Francis

Egerton, afterwards Lord Ellesmere, who confessedly wrote under the

inspiration of the Duke, and in this instance directly from a

memorandum drawn up by his Grace. Quite recently there have been found

and are now in the possession of the Rev. Frederick Gurney, the

grandson of the late Sir John Gurney, the notes of a "conversation with

the Duke of Wellington and Baron Gurney and Mr. Justice Williams,

Judges on Circuit, at Strath-fieldsaye House, on 24th February 1837."

The annotator was Baron Gurney, to the following effect:--"The

conversation had been commenced by my inquiring of him (the Duke)

whether a story which I had heard was true of his having ridden over to

Blücher on the night before the battle of Waterloo, and returned on the

same horse. He said--'No, that was not so. I did not see Blücher on the

day before Waterloo. I saw him the day before, on the day of Quatre

Bras. I saw him after Waterloo, and he kissed me. He embraced me on

horseback. I had communicated with him the day before Waterloo.'" The

rest of the conversation made no further reference to the topic of the

ride to Wavre.

It is not proposed to give here any account of the memorable battle,

the main incidents of which are familiar to all. It was of course

Wellington's policy to take up a defensive attitude; both because of

the incapacity of his raw soldiers for manoeuvring, and since every

minute before Napoleon should begin the offensive was of value to the

English commander, as it diminished the length of punishment he would

have to endure single-handed. Further, he was numerically weaker than

his adversary, while his troops were at once of divers nationalities

and divers character; his main reliance was on his British troops and

those of the King's German Legion. Napoleon for his part deliberately

delayed to attack when celerity of action was all-important to him,

disregarding the obvious probability of Prussian assistance to

Wellington, and sanguinely expecting that Grouchy would either avert

that support or reach him in time to neutralise it. Mr. Ropes has

written an admirable criticism of the errors of the French in their

contest with the Anglo-Dutch army, for which Ney was for the most part

responsible, since from before 3 P.M. Napoleon was engrossed in

preparing his right flank for defence against the Prussians. The issue

of the great battle all men know. The badness of the roads retarded the

Prussians greatly, and, save in Bülow's corps, there was no doubt

considerable delay in starting; but the proverb that "All's well that

ends well" might have been coined with special application to the

battle of Waterloo.

It only remains briefly to refer to Mr. Ropes's elaborate _résumé_ of

the melancholy adventures of Grouchy, on whom he may be regarded as too

severe. Sent out too late on a species of roving commission, more was

expected from him by Napoleon than could have been accomplished by any

but a leader of the highest order, whereas Grouchy had never given

evidence of being more than respectable. He received from his master

neither instructions nor information from the time he left the field of

Ligny until 4 P.M. of the 18th, nor until at Walhain he heard the

cannonade of Waterloo had he any knowledge of the whereabouts of the

French main army. On the morning of the 18th he was late in leaving

Gembloux, on not the most direct route towards Wavre; instead of moving

on which, when he heard the noise of the battle, he should no doubt

have marched straight for the Dyle bridges at Ottignies and Moustier.

Had he done so, spite of all delays he could have been across the Dyle

by 4 P.M. But when Mr. Ropes claims that thus Grouchy would have been

able to arrest the march toward the battlefield of the two leading

Prussian corps, one of which was four miles distant from him and the

other still farther away, he is too exacting. Had Grouchy made the vain

attempt, the two nearer Prussian corps would have taken him in flank

and headed him off, while Bülow and Ziethen pressed on to the

battlefield. If he had marched straight and swiftly on the

cannon-thunder of Waterloo, he might perhaps have been in time to

effect something in the nature of a diversion, although it is extremely

improbable that he could have materially changed the fortune of the

day; but instead, acting on the letter of Napoleon's instructions

despatched to him on the morning of the battle, he moved on Wavre and

engaged in a futile action with the Prussian 3rd Corps there. A shrewd

and enterprising man would have at least seen into the spirit of his

orders; Grouchy could not do this, and he is to be pitied rather than

blamed.

Camps, Quarters, and Casual Places · 第 60 / 61 题