Again I asked my teacher, "Is this not love?"

"Love is something like the clouds that were in the sky before the sun

came out," she replied. Then in simpler words than these, which at

that time I could not have understood, she explained: "You cannot touch

the clouds, you know; but you feel the rain and know how glad the

flowers and the thirsty earth are to have it after a hot day. You

cannot touch love either; but you feel the sweetness that it pours into

everything. Without love you would not be happy or want to play."

The beautiful truth burst upon my mind--I felt that there were

invisible lines stretched between my spirit and the spirits of others.

From the beginning of my education Miss Sullivan made it a practice to

speak to me as she would speak to any hearing child; the only

difference was that she spelled the sentences into my hand instead of

speaking them. If I did not know the words and idioms necessary to

express my thoughts she supplied them, even suggesting conversation

when I was unable to keep up my end of the dialogue.

This process was continued for several years; for the deaf child does

not learn in a month, or even in two or three years, the numberless

idioms and expressions used in the simplest daily intercourse. The

little hearing child learns these from constant repetition and

imitation. The conversation he hears in his home stimulates his mind

and suggests topics and calls forth the spontaneous expression of his

own thoughts. This natural exchange of ideas is denied to the deaf

child. My teacher, realizing this, determined to supply the kinds of

stimulus I lacked. This she did by repeating to me as far as possible,

verbatim, what she heard, and by showing me how I could take part in

the conversation. But it was a long time before I ventured to take the

initiative, and still longer before I could find something appropriate

to say at the right time.

The next important step in my education was learning to read.

As soon as I could spell a few words my teacher gave me slips of

cardboard on which were printed words in raised letters. I quickly

learned that each printed word stood for an object, an act, or a

quality. I had a frame in which I could arrange the words in little

sentences; but before I ever put sentences in the frame I used to make

them in objects. I found the slips of paper which represented, for

example, "doll," "is," "on," "bed" and placed each name on its object;

then I put my doll on the bed with the words _is_, _on_, _bed_ arranged

beside the doll, thus making a sentence of the words, and at the same

time carrying out the idea of the sentence with the things themselves.

One day, Miss Sullivan tells me, I pinned the word _girl_ on my

pinafore and stood in the wardrobe. On the shelf I arranged the words,

_is_, _in_, _wardrobe_. Nothing delighted me so much as this game. My

teacher and I played it for hours at a time. Often everything in the

room was arranged in object sentences.

From the printed slip it was but a step to the printed book. I took my

"Reader for Beginners" and hunted for the words I knew; when I found

them my joy was like that of a game of hide-and-seek. Thus I began to

read. Of the time when I began to read connected stories I shall speak

later.

For a long time I had no regular lessons. Even when I studied most

earnestly it seemed more like play than work. Everything Miss Sullivan

taught me she illustrated by a beautiful story or a poem. Whenever

anything delighted or interested me she talked it over with me just as

if she were a little girl herself. What many children think of with

dread, as a painful plodding through grammar, hard sums and harder

definitions, is to-day one of my most precious memories.

I cannot explain the peculiar sympathy Miss Sullivan had with

my pleasures and desires. Perhaps it was the result of long

association with the blind. Added to this she had a wonderful

faculty for description. She went quickly over uninteresting

details, and never nagged me with questions to see if I remembered the

day-before-yesterday's lesson. She introduced dry technicalities of

science little by little, making every subject so real that I could not

help remembering what she taught.

We read and studied out of doors, preferring the sunlit woods to the

house. All my early lessons have in them the breath of the woods--the

fine, resinous odour of pine needles, blended with the perfume of wild

grapes. Seated in the gracious shade of a wild tulip tree, I learned

to think that everything has a lesson and a suggestion.

Our favourite walk was to Keller's Landing, an old tumble-down

lumber-wharf on the Tennessee River, used during the Civil War to land

soldiers. There we spent many happy hours and played at learning

geography. I built dams of pebbles, made islands and lakes, and dug

river-beds, all for fun, and never dreamed that I was learning a

lesson. I listened with increasing wonder to Miss Sullivan's

descriptions of the great round world with its burning mountains,

buried cities, moving rivers of ice, and many other things as strange.

She made raised maps in clay, so that I could feel the mountain ridges

and valleys, and follow with my fingers the devious course of rivers.

I liked this, too; but the division of the earth into zones and poles

confused and teased my mind. The illustrative strings and the orange

stick representing the poles seemed so real that even to this day the

mere mention of temperate zone suggests a series of twine circles; and

I believe that if any one should set about it he could convince me that

white bears actually climb the North Pole.

Arithmetic seems to have been the only study I did not like. From the

first I was not interested in the science of numbers. Miss Sullivan

tried to teach me to count by stringing beads in groups, and by

arranging kindergarten straws I learned to add and subtract. I never

had patience to arrange more than five or six groups at a time. When I

had accomplished this my conscience was at rest for the day, and I went

out quickly to find my playmates.

In this same leisurely manner I studied zoology and botany.

Once a gentleman, whose name I have forgotten, sent me a collection of

fossils--tiny mollusk shells beautifully marked, and bits of sandstone

with the print of birds' claws, and a lovely fern in bas-relief. These

were the keys which unlocked the treasures of the antediluvian world

for me. With trembling fingers I listened to Miss Sullivan's

descriptions of the terrible beasts, with uncouth, unpronounceable

names, which once went tramping through the primeval forests, tearing

down the branches of gigantic trees for food, and died in the dismal

swamps of an unknown age. For a long time these strange creatures

haunted my dreams, and this gloomy period formed a sombre background to

the joyous Now, filled with sunshine and roses and echoing with the

gentle beat of my pony's hoof.

Another time a beautiful shell was given me, and with a child's

surprise and delight I learned how a tiny mollusk had built the

lustrous coil for his dwelling place, and how on still nights, when

there is no breeze stirring the waves, the Nautilus sails on the blue

waters of the Indian Ocean in his "ship of pearl."

It was in the spring of 1890 that I learned to speak. The impulse to

utter audible sounds had always been strong within me. I used to make

noises, keeping one hand on my throat while the other hand felt the

movements of my lips. I was pleased with anything that made a noise

and liked to feel the cat purr and the dog bark. I also liked to keep

my hand on a singer's throat, or on a piano when it was being played.

Before I lost my sight and hearing, I was fast learning to talk, but

after my illness it was found that I had ceased to speak because I

could not hear. I used to sit in my mother's lap all day long and keep

my hands on her face because it amused me to feel the motions of her

lips; and I moved my lips, too, although I had forgotten what talking

was. My friends say that I laughed and cried naturally, and for a

while I made many sounds and word-elements, not because they were a

means of communication, but because the need of exercising my vocal

organs was imperative. There was, however, one word the meaning of

which I still remembered, water. I pronounced it "wa-wa." Even this

became less and less intelligible until the time when Miss Sullivan

began to teach me. I stopped using it only after I had learned to

spell the word on my fingers.

I had known for a long time that the people about me used a method of

communication different from mine; and even before I knew that a deaf

child could be taught to speak, I was conscious of dissatisfaction with

the means of communication I already possessed. One who is entirely

dependent upon the manual alphabet has always a sense of restraint, of

narrowness. This feeling began to agitate me with a vexing,

forward-reaching sense of a lack that should be filled. My thoughts

would often rise and beat up like birds against the wind; and I

persisted in using my lips and voice. Friends tried to discourage this

tendency, fearing lest it would lead to disappointment. But I

persisted, and an accident soon occurred which resulted in the breaking

down of this great barrier--I heard the story of Ragnhild Kaata.

In 1890 Mrs. Lamson, who had been one of Laura Bridgman's teachers, and

who had just returned from a visit to Norway and Sweden, came to see

me, and told me of Ragnhild Kaata, a deaf and blind girl in Norway who

had actually been taught to speak. Mrs. Lamson had scarcely finished

telling me about this girl's success before I was on fire with

eagerness. I resolved that I, too, would learn to speak. I would not

rest satisfied until my teacher took me, for advice and assistance, to

Miss Sarah Fuller, principal of the Horace Mann School. This lovely,

sweet-natured lady offered to teach me herself, and we began the

twenty-sixth of March, 1890.

Miss Fuller's method was this: she passed my hand lightly over her

face, and let me feel the position of her tongue and lips when she made

a sound. I was eager to imitate every motion, and in an hour had

learned six elements of speech: M, P, A, S, T, I. Miss Fuller gave me

eleven lessons in all. I shall never forget the surprise and delight I

felt when I uttered my first connected sentence, "It is warm." True,

they were broken and stammering syllables; but they were human speech.

My soul, conscious of new strength, came out of bondage, and was

reaching through those broken symbols of speech to all knowledge and

all faith.

No deaf child who has earnestly tried to speak the words which he has

never heard--to come out of the prison of silence, where no tone of

love, on song of bird, no strain of music ever pierces the

stillness--can forget the thrill of surprise, the joy of discovery

which came over him when he uttered his first word. Only such a one

can appreciate the eagerness with which I talked to my toys, to stones,

trees, birds and dumb animals, or the delight I felt when at my call

Mildred ran to me or my dogs obeyed my commands. It is an unspeakable

boon to me to be able to speak in winged words that need no

interpretation. As I talked, happy thoughts fluttered up out of my

words that might perhaps have struggled in vain to escape my fingers.

But it must not be supposed that I could really talk in this short

time. I had learned only the elements of speech. Miss Fuller and Miss

Sullivan could understand me, but most people would not have understood

one word in a hundred. Nor is it true that, after I had learned these

elements, I did the rest of the work myself. But for Miss Sullivan's

genius, untiring perseverance and devotion, I could not have progressed

as far as I have toward natural speech. In the first place, I laboured

night and day before I could be understood even by my most intimate

friends; in the second place, I needed Miss Sullivan's assistance

constantly in my efforts to articulate each sound clearly and to

combine all sounds in a thousand ways. Even now she calls my attention

every day to mispronounced words.

All teachers of the deaf know what this means, and only they can at all

appreciate the peculiar difficulties with which I had to contend. In

reading my teacher's lips I was wholly dependent on my fingers: I had

to use the sense of touch in catching the vibrations of the throat, the

movements of the mouth, and the expression of the face; and often this

sense was at fault. In such cases I was forced to repeat the words or

sentences, sometimes for hours, until I felt the proper ring in my own

voice. My work was practice, practice, practice. Discouragement and

weariness cast me down frequently; but the next moment the thought that

I should soon be at home and show my loved ones what I had

accomplished, spurred me on, and I eagerly looked forward to their

pleasure in my achievement.

"My little sister will understand me now," was a thought stronger than

all obstacles. I used to repeat ecstatically, "I am not dumb now." I

could not be despondent while I anticipated the delight of talking to

my mother and reading her responses from her lips. It astonished me to

find how much easier it is to talk than to spell with the fingers, and

I discarded the manual alphabet as a medium of communication on my

part; but Miss Sullivan and a few friends still use it in speaking to

me, for it is more convenient and more rapid than lip-reading.

Just here, perhaps, I had better explain our use of the manual

alphabet, which seems to puzzle people who do not know us. One who

reads or talks to me spells with his hand, using the single-hand manual

alphabet generally employed by the deaf. I place my hand on the hand

of the speaker so lightly as not to impede its movements. The position

of the hand is as easy to feel as it is to see. I do not feel each

letter any more than you see each letter separately when you read.

Constant practice makes the fingers very flexible, and some of my

friends spell rapidly--about as fast as an expert writes on a

typewriter. The mere spelling is, of course, no more a conscious act

than it is in writing.

When I had made speech my own, I could not wait to go home. At last

the happiest of happy moments arrived. I had made my homeward journey,

talking constantly to Miss Sullivan, not for the sake of talking, but

determined to improve to the last minute. Almost before I knew it, the

train stopped at the Tuscumbia station, and there on the platform stood

the whole family. My eyes fill with tears now as I think how my mother

pressed me close to her, speechless and trembling with delight, taking

in every syllable that I spoke, while little Mildred seized my free

hand and kissed it and danced, and my father expressed his pride and

affection in a big silence. It was as if Isaiah's prophecy had been

fulfilled in me. "The mountains and the hills shall break forth before

you into singing, and all the trees of the field shall clap their

hands!"

Stories of Achievement, Volume IV, Authors and Journalists · 第 43 / 43 题