From the "Confessions of Rousseau."

It is strange to hear that those critics who spoke of Rousseau's

"incomparable gift of expression," of his "easy, natural style," were

ludicrously incorrect in their allusions. From his "Confessions" we

learn that he had no gift of clear, fluent expression; that he was by

nature so incoherent that he could not creditably carry on an ordinary

conversation; and that the ideas which stirred Europe, although

spontaneously conceived, were brought forth and set before the world

only after their progenitor had suffered the real pangs of labor.

But after all it is the same old story over again. Great things are

rarely said or done easily.

Two things very opposite unite in me, and in a manner which I cannot

myself conceive. My disposition is extremely ardent, my passions

lively and impetuous, yet my ideas are produced slowly, with great

embarrassment and after much afterthought. It might be said my heart

and understanding do not belong to the same individual. A sentiment

takes possession of my soul with the rapidity of lightning, but instead

of illuminating, it dazzles and confounds me; I feel all, but see

nothing; I am warm but stupid; to think I must be cool. What is

astonishing, my conception is clear and penetrating, if not hurried: I

can make excellent impromptus at leisure, but on the instant could

never say or do anything worth notice. I could hold a tolerable

conversation by the post, as they say the Spaniards play at chess, and

when I read that anecdote of a duke of Savoy, who turned himself round,

while on a journey, to cry out "_a votre gorge, marchand de Paris_!" I

said, "Here is a trait of my character!"

This slowness of thought, joined to vivacity of feeling, I am not only

sensible of in conversation, but even alone. When I write, my ideas

are arranged with the utmost difficulty. They glance on my imagination

and ferment till they discompose, heat, and bring on a palpitation;

during this state of agitation I see nothing properly, cannot write a

single word, and must wait till all is over. Insensibly the agitation

subsides, the chaos acquires form, and each circumstance takes its

proper place. Have you never seen an opera in Italy where during the

change of scene everything is in confusion, the decorations are

intermingled, and any one would suppose that all would be overthrown;

yet by little and little, everything is arranged, nothing appears

wanting, and we feel surprised to see the tumult succeeded by the most

delightful spectacle. This is a resemblance of what passes in my brain

when I attempt to write; had I always waited till that confusion was

past, and then pointed, in their natural beauties, the objects that had

presented themselves, few authors would have surpassed me.

Thence arises the extreme difficulty I find in writing; my manuscripts,

blotted, scratched, and scarcely legible, attest the trouble they cost

me; nor is there one of them but I have been obliged to transcribe four

or five times before it went to press. Never could I do anything when

placed at a table, pen in hand; it must be walking among the rocks, or

in the woods; it is at night in my bed, during my wakeful hours, that I

compose; it may be judged how slowly, particularly for a man who has

not the advantage of verbal memory, and never in his life could retain

by heart six verses. Some of my periods I have turned and returned in

my head five or six nights before they were fit to be put to paper:

thus it is that I succeed better in works that require laborious

attention than those that appear more trivial, such as letters, in

which I could never succeed, and being obliged to write one is to me a

serious punishment; nor can I express my thoughts on the most trivial

subjects without it costing me hours of fatigue. If I write

immediately what strikes me, my letter is a long, confused, unconnected

string of expressions, which, when read, can hardly be understood.

It is not only painful to me to give language to my ideas but even to

receive them. I have studied mankind, and think myself a tolerable

observer, yet I know nothing from what I see, but all from what I

remember, nor have I understanding except in my recollections. From

all that is said, from all that passes in my presence, I feel nothing,

conceive nothing, the exterior sign being all that strikes me;

afterward it returns to my remembrance; I recollect the place, the

time, the manner, the look, and gesture, not a circumstance escapes me;

it is then, from what has been done or said, that I imagine what has

been thought, and I have rarely found myself mistaken.

So little master of my understanding when alone, let any one judge what

I must be in conversation, where to speak with any degree of ease you

must think of a thousand things at the same time: the bare idea that I

should forget something material would be sufficient to intimidate me.

Nor can I comprehend how people can have the confidence to converse in

large companies, where each word must pass in review before so many,

and where it would be requisite to know their several characters and

histories to avoid saying what might give offence. In this particular,

those who frequent the world would have a great advantage, as they know

better where to be silent, and can speak with greater confidence; yet

even they sometimes let fall absurdities; in what predicament then must

he be who drops as it were from the clouds? It is almost impossible he

should speak ten minutes with impunity.

In a tête-à-tête there is a still worse inconvenience; that is, the

necessity of talking perpetually, at least, the necessity of answering

when spoken to, and keeping up the conversation when the other is

silent. This insupportable constraint is alone sufficient to disgust

me with variety, for I cannot form an idea of a greater torment than

being obliged to speak continually without time for recollection. I

know not whether it proceeds from my mortal hatred of all constraint;

but if I am obliged to speak, I infallibly talk nonsense. What is

still worse, instead of learning how to be silent when I have

absolutely nothing to say, it is generally at such times that I have a

violent inclination; and, endeavoring to pay my debt of conversation as

speedily as possible, I hastily gabble a number of words without ideas,

happy when they only chance to mean nothing; thus endeavoring to

conquer or hide my incapacity, I rarely fail to show it.

I think I have said enough to show that, though not a fool, I have

frequently passed for one, even among people capable of judging; this

was the more vexatious, as my physiognomy and eyes promised otherwise,

and expectation being frustrated, my stupidity appeared the more

shocking. This detail, which a particular occasion gave birth to, will

not be useless in the sequel, being a key to many of my actions which

might otherwise appear unaccountable; and have been attributed to a

savage humor I do not possess. I love society as much as any man, was

I not certain to exhibit myself in it, not only disadvantageously, but

totally different from what I really am. The plan I have adopted of

writing and retirement is what exactly suits me. Had I been present,

my worth would never have been known, no one would ever have suspected

it; thus it was with Madam Dupin, a woman of sense, in whose house I

lived for several years; indeed, she has often since owned it to me:

though on the whole this rule may be subject to some exceptions. . . .

The heat of the summer was this year (1749) excessive. Vincennes is

two leagues from Paris. The state of my finances not permitting me to

pay for hackney coaches, at two o'clock in the afternoon, I went on

foot, when alone, and walked as fast as possible, that I might arrive

the sooner. The trees by the side of the road, always lopped,

according to the custom of the country, afforded but little shade, and

exhausted by fatigue, I frequently threw myself on the ground, being

unable to proceed any farther. I thought a book in my hand might make

me moderate my pace. One day I took the _Mercure de France_, and as I

walked and read, I came to the following question proposed by the

academy of Dijon, for the premium of the ensuing year: Has the progress

of sciences and arts contributed to corrupt or purify morals?

The moment I had read this, I seemed to behold another world, and

became a different man. Although I have a lively remembrance of the

impression it made upon me, the detail has escaped my mind, since I

communicated it to M. de Malesherbes in one of my four letters to him.

This is one of the singularities of my memory which merits to be

remarked. It serves me in proportion to my dependence upon it; the

moment I have committed to paper that with which it was charged, it

forsakes me, and I have no sooner written a thing than I had forgotten

it entirely. This singularity is the same with respect to music.

Before I learned the use of notes I knew a great number of songs; the

moment I had made a sufficient progress to sing an air of art set to

music, I could not recollect any one of them; and, at present, I much

doubt whether I should be able entirely to go through one of those of

which I was the most fond. All I distinctly recollect upon this

occasion is, that on my arrival at Vincennes, I was in an agitation

which approached a delirium. Diderot perceived it; I told him the

cause, and read to him the prosopopoeia of Fabricius, written with a

pencil under a tree. He encouraged me to pursue my ideas, and to

become a competitor for the premium. I did so, and from that moment I

was ruined.

All the rest of my misfortunes during my life were the inevitable

effect of this moment of error.

My sentiments became elevated with the most inconceivable rapidity to

the level of my ideas. All my little passions were stifled by the

enthusiasm of truth, liberty, and virtue; and, what is most

astonishing, this effervescence continued in my mind upward of five

years, to as great a degree, perhaps, as it has ever done in that of

any other man. I composed the discourse in a very singular manner, and

in that style which I have always followed in my other works, I

dedicated to it the hours of the night in which sleep deserted me; I

meditated in my bed with my eyes closed, and in my mind turned over and

over again my periods with incredible labor and care; the moment they

were finished to my satisfaction, I deposited in my memory, until I had

an opportunity of committing them to paper; but the time of rising and

putting on my clothes made me lose everything, and when I took up my

pen I recollected but little of what I had composed. I made Madam le

Vasseur my secretary; I had lodged her with her daughter and husband

nearer to myself; and she, to save me the expense of a servant, came

every morning to make my fire, and to do such other little things as

were necessary. As soon as she arrived I dictated to her while in bed

what I had composed in the night, and this method, which for a long

time I observed, preserved me many things I should otherwise have

forgotten.

As soon as the discourse was finished, I showed it to Diderot. He was

satisfied with the production, and pointed out some corrections he

thought necessary to be made. However, this composition, full of force

and fire, absolutely wants logic and order; of all the works I ever

wrote, this is the weakest in reasoning, and the most devoid of number

and harmony. With whatever talent a man may be born, the art of

writing is not easily learned.

I sent off this piece without mentioning it to anybody, except, I

think, to Grimm.

The year following (1750), not thinking more of my discourse, I learned

it had gained the premium at Dijon. This news awakened all the ideas

which had dictated it to me, gave them new animation, and completed the

fermentation of my heart of that first leaves of heroism and virtue

which my father, my country, and Plutarch had inspired in my infancy.

Nothing now appeared great in my eyes but to be free and virtuous,

superior to fortune and opinion, and independent of all exterior

circumstances; although a false shame, and the fear of disapprobation

at first prevented me from conducting myself according to these

principles, and from suddenly quarrelling with the maxims of the age in

which I lived, I from that moment took a decided resolution to do

it. . . .

Stories of Achievement, Volume IV, Authors and Journalists · 第 12 / 43 题