CHAPTER VIII

THE MIMIC WORLD

We have seen that Oldfield affected to despise tragedy, and was wont

to suggest Mistress Porter as a lady better suited than herself to the

purposes of train-bearing. And as the present chapter will be devoted

to a few of Nance's contemporaries let us linger, if only for an

instant, over the imposing memory of one whom cynical Horace Walpole

thought even finer than Garrick in certain scenes of passion. This

"ornament to human nature," as a biographer warmly called the Porter,

played her first childish part in a Lord Mayor's pageant during

the reign of James II., appearing as the Genius of Britain, and

incidentally falling under the august notice of another genius of

Britain, the great Mr. Betterton. That worthy man regarded the little

girl with prophetic eyes, saw in her a wealth of undeveloped talent,

and was soon instructing the chit in the mysteries of dramatic art.

Sometimes the actress-in-miniature revolted, poor mite ("she should

have been in the nursery, the minx," says some practical reader) and

then noble Thomas would give vent to an awful threat. She must speak

and act as she was directed, or else--horrible thought--the child

should be thrown into the basket of an orange-girl and buried under

one of the vine leaves which hid the luscious fruit! And with

that punishment hanging over her, the novice went on learning and

originating, until one day London woke up to find a new tragedienne

within its boundaries.

[Illustration: Mr. Mills, Mrs. Porter, Mr. Cibber.]

'Twas a tragedienne, be it added, who possessed no wonderful charm

of person. She was pleasing in figure and bearing, but her voice was

naturally harsh, her features did not shine forth loveliness, and when

the scene wherein she walked called neither for vehemence of feeling,

nor melting tenderness, her elocution became a monotonous cadence.[A]

Yet in moments of dramatic excitement, or in places where the deep

note of pathos had to be sounded, Porter played with a distinction

that either thrilled the spectator or reduced him to the verge of

tears. She threw cadence and monotony to the four winds of heaven,

or rather to the four corners of the stage, and spoke with the

earnestness of one inspired.

[Footnote A: Mrs. Porter was tall, fair, well-shaped, and easy and

dignified in action. But she was not handsome, and her voice had a

small degree of tremor. Moreover, she imitated, or, rather, faultily

exceeded, Mrs. Barry in the habit of prolonging and toning her

pronunciation, sometimes to a degree verging upon a chant; but

whether it was that the public ear was at that period accustomed to a

demi-chant, or that she threw off the defect in the heat of passion,

it is certain that her general judgment and genius, in the highest

bursts of tragedy, inspired enthusiasm in all around her, and that

she was thought to be alike mistress of the terrible and the

tender.--THOMAS CAMPBELL.]

As Queen Catherine Mrs. Porter was all mournful grace and dignity, as

Lady Macbeth she breathed of battle, murder and sudden death, and in

the rôle of Belvidera she showed yet another phase of her incomparable

art. "I remember Mrs. Porter, to whom nature had been so niggard in

voice and face, so great in many parts, as Lady Macbeth, Alicia in

'Jane Shore,' Hermione in the 'Distressed Mother,' and many parts of

the kind, that her great action, eloquence of look and gesture, moved

astonishment; and yet I have heard her declare she left the action

to the possession of the sentiments in the part she performed." Thus

wrote Chetwood, whose good fortune it was to see Oldfield, and Porter,

and a host of other famous players, not forgetting, in later days, the

wonderful Garrick himself.

Unlike several of her ilk, Mistress Porter could play the heroine off

the stage as well as on. She lived at Heywoodhill, near Hendon, and

used to wend her way homeward every night, at the conclusion of the

play, in a one-horse chaise. The roads were dangerous, and highwaymen

lurked in the neighbourhood, but the actress put her faith in

Providence--and a brace of pistols which she always carried. The

pistols came very nicely to her rescue one evening when a robber

waylaid the chaise and put to the traveller the conventional question

as to whether she most valued her money or her life. Nothing daunted

by the impertinence of this ethical query, Mrs. Porter pointed one of

the weapons at the intruder, and he, so goes the story, gracefully

surrendered, for the reason that he was himself without firearms. The

man made the best of the situation, however, by assuring the occupant

of the vehicle that he was "no common thief," and had been driven to

his present course by the wants of a starving family. He told her,

at the same time, where he lived, and urged his distresses with such

earnestness, that she spared him all the money in her purse, which was

about ten guineas.[A]

[Footnote A: Bellchambers' "Memoirs." This episode happened in the

summer of 1731.]

Thereupon the highwayman departed, and Mrs. Porter whipped up her

horse. In her excitement she must have used the lash too freely, for

the animal started to run, the chaise was overturned, and the actress

dislocated her thigh bone. When she had in part recovered from the

accident, the victim made up a purse of sixty pounds, subscribed

among her friends, and sent it to the poverty-stricken family of the

desperado. How Nance would have laughed at the story had she been at

the theatre to hear it told. But there was no more merriment for

this daughter of smiles; she was lying cold and still amid the stony

grandeur of Westminster Abbey.

Poor Porter outlived Oldfield for more than thirty years and, having

also outlived an annuity settled upon herself, spent her declining

days in what polite writers call straightened circumstances. One of

the closing scenes of her career shows us a meeting between this

veteran of the stage and Dr. Johnson, who could allow his kindness

of heart and sense of generosity to overcome his hatred of things

theatrical. It is easy to imagine the whole interview: the shrunken

face of the Porter beaming all over with an appreciation of the honour

paid her, and the Doctor full of benevolence and patronising courtesy,

even to the extent of drinking cheap tea without a grumble. After the

philosopher takes his leave he will likewise take with him a vivid

memory of the beldam's many wrinkles--so many, indeed, that "a

picture of old age in the abstract might have been taken from her

countenance."[A]

[Footnote A: Dr. Johnson was pleased to avow that "Mrs. Porter in the

vehemence of rage, and Mrs. Clive in the sprightliness of humour, he

had never seen equalled."]

Of a different calibre was Lacy Ryan, an ill-trained genius who could

shine pretty well in both tragedy and comedy and from whom, according

to Foote,

"... succeeding Richards took the cue,

And hence his style, if not the colour, drew."[A]

[Footnote A: Justice has scarcely been done to Ryan's merit. Garrick,

on going with Woodward to see his Richard with a view of being amused,

owned that he was astonished at the genius and power he saw struggling

to make itself felt through the burden of ill-training, uncouth

gestures, and an ungraceful and slovenly figure. He was generous

enough to own that all the merit there was in his own playing of

Richard he had drawn from studying this less fortunate player.--PERCY

FITZGERALD.]

Like Mrs. Porter, Ryan was a youthful disciple of Betterton, and was

brought to the notice of Roscius in a curious fashion. One day, when

Lacy had just begun, as a boy of sixteen or seventeen, to court the

dramatic muses, he was cast for the rôle of Seyton, the old officer

who attends on Macbeth, and was, no doubt, charmed with the

assignment. To wait upon Macbeth, in however humble a capacity, was

in itself no mean honour, and when the aforesaid Macbeth would be

Betterton himself, the importance of the task was re-doubled.

That afternoon Ryan came on the stage in all the glory of a

full-bottomed wig (imagine playing Shakespeare these days with

full-bottomed wigs) and a smiling young face, being very much pleased

with himself and the world in general. To Betterton, who had expected

to see in Seyton a henchman of mature years, and who up to this moment

had been unconscious of Lacy's existence, the appearance of the boy

came as a shock. Had the witches of the tragedy been turned into

beautiful children he could not have been more surprised. However, he

gave the new Seyton an encouraging look, and the stripling played the

part in a way to earn the approbation of the great actor. After the

performance was over, Betterton scolded old Downes, the prompter, for

"sending a child to him instead of a man advanced in years."

This anecdote seems to show that the art of "make-up" had not reached

perfection in those times, for a few well-put strokes of the pencil

should have destroyed the juvenile aspect of Seyton. It must not be

supposed, nevertheless, that the decoration of the face was unknown,

and an entry in Pepys' delightful diary proves that "make-up" of a

certain kind flourished at the Restoration. "To the King's house,"

says Pepys, "and there going in met with Knipp, and she took us up

into the tireing-rooms;[A] and to the women's shift, where Nell

(Gwyne) was dressing herself, and was all unready, and is very pretty,

prettier than I thought. (Imagine the gloating eyes of the old

hypocrite.) And into the scene-room, and there sat down, and she gave

us fruit: and here I read the questions to Knipp, while she answered

me, through all her part of 'Flora's Figarys,' which was acted to-day.

But, Lord! to see how they were both painted, would make a man mad,

and did make me loath them: and what base company of men comes among

them; and how loudly they talk! And how poor the men are in clothes,

and yet what a show they make on the stage by candle-light, is very

observable. But to see how Nell cursed, for having so few people in

the pit, was strange," _et cetera_.[B]

[Footnote A: Mrs. Knipp was an actress belonging to the King's Company

and Mr. Pepys had for her a timid admiration.]

[Footnote B: In his notes to Cibber's "Apology," Lowe suggests the

plausible theory that young actors playing "juveniles" did not use

any "make-up" or paint, but went on the stage with their natural

complexion. He instances this paragraph from Cibber: "The first thing

that enters into the head of a young actor is that of being a heroe:

In this ambition I was soon snubb'd by the insufficiency of my voice;

to which might be added an uniform'd meagre person (tho' then not

ill-made) with a dismal pale complexion."]

To leave the merry days of Charles II, and wander back to those of

Queen Anne, it may be said that Ryan made his first success as the

Marcus in the original production of "Cato." It was a success rather

added to than otherwise by an adventure of which this actor was the

unfortunate victim. "In the run of that celebrated tragedy," writes

Chetwood, "he was accidently brought into a fray with some of our

Tritons on the Thames; and, in the scuffle, a blow on the nose was

given him by one of these water-bullies, who neither regard men or

manners. I remember, the same night, as he was brought on the bier,

after his suppos'd death in the fourth act of 'Cato,' the blood, from

the real wound in the face, gush'd out with violence; that hurt had

no other effect than just turning his nose a little, tho' not to

deformity; yet some people imagine it gave a very small alteration to

the tone of his voice, tho' nothing disagreeable." And a very good

advertisement it was, no doubt.

In later years another much-discussed accident befell Mr. Ryan. As he

was going home from the theatre one night, the actor was attacked by a

footpad, and received in his face two bullets which broke a portion of

his jaw. "By the help of a lamp [again is the quotation from Chetwood]

the robber knew Mr. Ryan, as I have been inform'd, begg'd his pardon

for his mistake, and ran off. Of this hurt, too, he recover'd, after a

long illness, and play'd with success, as before, without any seeming

alteration of voice or face. His Royal Highness, upon this accident

(was it the Prince of Wales, afterwards George II?) sent him a

handsome present; and others, of the nobility, copy'd the laudable

example of the second illustrious person in the three kingdoms."

This was Lacy Ryan, who in his time played many different parts, among

them Iago, Hamlet, Macduff, Captain Plume, and Orestes. He was not in

any sense of the word a great actor, but he well adorned the station

of theatrical life in which it had pleased heaven to place him, and

strutted his lengthy hour upon the stage with much satisfaction to

his companions and the public. Even when Ryan had to kill a bully in

self-defence (it was a fellow named Kelly, who loved to haunt the

coffee-houses, pick quarrels with peaceable citizens, and then half

murder them), the world looked on approvingly, and averred that the

player had acted with his usual conscientiousness.

Another contemporary of Nance was Benjamin Johnson,[A] who achieved

curiously enough some of his greatest successes in the plays of his

namesake, the other Ben Jonson. He began life as a scene painter, but

afterwards turned his attention to the front, rather than the back,

of the stage--or, as he would humorously explain, "left the saint's

occupation to take that of a sinner." Johnson seems to have been a man

of the world, and he saw a good deal of life, even though he never

passed through the rough-and-tumble adventures of Lacy Ryan. When he

was born (1665) Betterton dominated the boards; when he died (1742)

Garrick had become the talk of London; and it is probable that in his

latter years Ben could tell many a story of interesting experiences.

[Footnote A: Ben Johnson excelled greatly in all his namesake's

comedies, then frequently acted. He was of all comedians the chastest

and closest observer of nature. Johnson never seemed to know that he

was before an audience; he drew his character as the poet designed

it.--DAVIES.]

There was one story, at least, that this actor used to relate with

much unction after a visit which he once paid to Dublin. The hero of

the affair was an Irishman, named Baker, who relieved the monotony

of his work as a master pavior by acting Sir John Falstaff and other

parts. When he was in the streets, overseeing the labours of his men,

this pavior-artist usually rehearsed one of his characters, muttering

the lines, gesticulating, and almost forgetting that he was without

the sacred walls of a theatre. The workmen soon got accustomed to

these out-of-door performances, and everything proceeded with the

utmost smoothness, until one exciting day when Baker chanced to be

alone with two new paviors. These recruits (countrymen from Cheshire)

were much alarmed at a sudden change in the demeanour of their master,

whose eyes began to roll and lips to move under the pressure of some

strange emotion. Baker was merely rehearsing Falstaff; but the two men

made up their little minds that he had lost his head, and they felt

quite sure that their employer was a dangerous lunatic, when he gave

them a piercing glance, and cried:

"Soft! who are you? Sir Walter Blunt: there's honour for you! here's

no vanity! I am as hot as molten lead, and as heavy too. God keep lead

out of me!"

"Wauns! I'se blunt enough to take care of you, I'se warrant you,"

shouted one of the workmen, who had now recovered what he presumed to

be his wits, and thereupon he and his companion laid violent hands on

Baker. A crowd soon gathered, and despite the indignant cries of

the master-pavior, who declared he was never more sane, this son of

Thespis was tied hand and foot, and carried home in triumph with a

howling mob for attendants. That ended Mr. Baker's rehearsal for the

nonce; and it is to be presumed that, when next he essayed the lusty

Sir John, he made sure of an appreciative audience.

It is a seductive occupation to delve into the lives of these bygone

players, and there is always temptation to tarry long and lovingly

amid such chequered careers. But, like poor Joe, of Dickens, we must

keep moving on, and so leave Johnson and Baker for another actor

who waits to strut across the stage of these "Palmy Days." Thomas

Elrington is the new-comer; the same Elrington who sought to outshine

the tragic Barton Booth, without possessing either the genius or the

scholarship of that noble son of Melpomene. As a boy, Thomas was

apprenticed by an impecunious father to an upholsterer in Covent

Garden, but he cared more for the theatre than for his trade, and

was, no doubt, regarded by his employer as a future candidate for the

gallows.

* * * * *

"I remember when he was an apprentice," relates Chetwood, "we play'd

in several private plays; when we were preparing to act 'Sophonisba,

or Hannibal's Overthrow,' after I had wrote out my part of Massiva I

carried him the book of the play to study the part of King Masinissa.

I found him finishing a velvet cushion, and gave him the book:

but alas! before he could secrete it, his master (a hot, voluble

Frenchman), came in upon us, and the book was thrust under the velvet

of the cushion. His master, as usual, rated him for not working, with

a 'Morbleu! why a you not vark, Tom?' and stood over him so long that

I saw, with some mortification, the book irrecoverably stitch'd up in

the cushion never to be retriev'd till the cushion is worn to pieces.

Poor Tom cast many a desponding look upon me when he was finishing the

fate of the play, while every stitch went to both our hearts.

"His master observing our looks, turn'd to me, and with words that

broke their necks over each other for haste, abused both of us. The

most intelligible of his great number of words were Jack Pudenges, and

the like expressions of contempt. But our play was gone for ever.

"Another time," continues the biographer, "we were so bold to attempt

Shakespeare's 'Hamlet,' where our 'prentice Tom had the part of the

Ghost, father to young Hamlet. His armour was composed of pasteboard,

neatly painted. The Frenchman had intelligence of what we were about,

and to our great surprise and mortification, made one of our audience.

The Ghost in its first appearance is dumb to Horatio. While these

scenes past, the Frenchman only muttered between his teeth, and we

were in hopes his passion would subside; but when our Ghost began his

first speech to Hamlet, 'Mark me,' he replied, 'Begar, me vil marke

you presently!' and, without saying any more, beat our poor Ghost off

the stage through the street, while every stroke on the pasteboard

armour grieved the auditors (because they did not pay for their

seats), insomuch that three or four ran after the Ghost, and brought

him back in triumph, with the avenging Frenchman at his heels, who

would not be appeas'd till our Ghost promised him never to commit the

offence of acting again. A promise made, like many others, never to be

kept."

* * * * *

Elrington ultimately became a favourite player with Dublin audiences,

and then contested with Booth in the latter's own ground of London. He

never equalled the classic Barton, yet made a success in tragedy, and

was once asked (1728-9) to join the forces of Drury Lane for a term

of years. He told the managers that he could not think of permanently

leaving Ireland, where he was so well rewarded for his services, and

added, "There is not a gentleman's house there to which I am not a

welcome visitor," which shows that an actor can be a snob, like the

worst of us.

When Elrington died, two years after the taking off of Oldfield, his

epitaph was written in these flattering lines:--

"Thou best of actors here interr'd,

No more thy charming voice is heard,

This grave thy corse contains:

Thy better part, which us'd to move

Our admiration, and our Love,

Has fled its sad remains.

"Tho' there's no monumental brass,

Thy sacred relicks to encase,

Thou wondrous man of art!

A lover of the muse divine,

O! Elrington, shall be thy shrine,

And carve thee in his heart."

One of Elrington's friends and artistic associates happened to be

John Evans, a player possessed of talent, fatness, and indolence. As

adventures seem to be in order in this chapter, let us recall two

which occurred to this gentleman at a time when he was in high favour

with the Irish. The first episode, making a warlike prologue to the

second, had for its scene a tavern in the good city of Cork, where

Evans had been invited to sup by some officers stationed in the

neighbourhood. Jack responded gladly to the hospitable suggestion; the

gathering proved a great success, the wine was circulated generously,

and many toasts were offered. When the actor was called upon for a

sentiment, he proposed the health of his gracious sovereign, Anne,

whereat all in the company were pleased with the exception of one

disloyal redcoat. Whether the latter had within him the contrariness

which cometh with too liberal dalliance with the flowing bowl, or

whether he chanced to be a Jacobite, further deponent sayeth not, but

it is at least certain that the officer was not pleased at the honour

paid to the Queen whose uniform he was willing to wear. So Mr.

Malcontent leaves the room, and then sends up word to poor,

inoffensive Jack, that he will be delighted to see that worthy below

stairs; whereupon Jack quietly steals away and finds his would-be

antagonist lurking behind a half-opened door. The soldier makes a

lunge with his sword at the player, who succeeds in disarming the

coward, and there the matter apparently stops.

But the end was not yet. When Evans went to Dublin, he found that his

late challenger was circulating a lie, which made it appear that the

comedian had in somewise affronted the whole British Army. No sooner

did Jack put his face upon the stage than a great clamour arose, and

it was decreed by the bullies among the audience (of whom there are

ever a few in every house), that no play should be presented until the

culprit had publicly begged pardon for a sin which he never committed.

The play was "The Rival Queens," the part assigned to Evans that of

Alexander, but 'twas some time before this Alexander could be induced

to crave the forgiveness of the excitable Dublinites. Finally he

yielded to expediency, and, coming forward to the centre of the stage,

expressed his contrition. At this, a puppy in the pit cried out

"Kneel, you rascal!" and Evans, now thoroughly exasperated, tartly

answered: "No, you rascal! I'll kneel to none but God, and my Queen."

Then the performance began.[A]

[Footnote A: "As there were many worthy gentlemen of the army who knew

the whole affair, the new rais'd clamour ceas'd, and the play went

through without any molestation, and, by degrees, things return'd to

their proper channel By this we may see, it is some danger for an

actor to be in the right."--CHETWOOD.]

How Chetwood bubbles over with a stream of ever-flowing anecdote. Much

that he gives us in his "General History of the Stage" is only gossip,

yet what is there more fascinating than tittle-tattle about players?

The gossip of the drawing-room is merely inane, or else scandalous;

but shift the scene to the theatre, and a story no longer bores; it is

consecrated by the sacrament of interest. Is any apology necessary,

therefore, if the quotation marks be again brought into requisition.

This time the anecdote is of Thomas Griffith, an excellent comedian,

and a harmless poet.

"After his commencing actor, he contracted a friendship with Mr.

Wilks; which chain remained unbroke till the death of that excellent

comedian. Tho' Mr. Griffith was very young, Mr. Wilks took him with

him to London (from Dublin), and had him entered for that season at

a small salary. The 'Indian Emperor' being ordered on a sudden to

be played, the part of Pizarro, a Spaniard, was wanting, which Mr.

Griffith procured, with some difficulty. Mr. Betterton being a little

indisposed, would not venture out to rehearsal, for fear of increasing

his indisposition, to the disappointment of the audience, who had not

seen our young stripling rehearse. But, when he came ready, at the

entrance, his ears were pierced with a voice not familiar to him. He

cast his eyes upon the stage, where he beheld the diminutive Pizarro,

with a truncheon as long as himself (his own words.)

"He steps up to Downs, the prompter, and cry'd, 'Zounds, Downs, what

sucking scaramouch have you sent on there?' 'Sir,' replied Downs,

'He's good enough for a Spaniard; the part is small.' Betterton

return'd, 'If he had made his eyebrows his whiskers, and each whisker

a line, the part would have been two lines too much for such a monkey

in buskins.'

"Poor Griffith stood on the stage, near the door, and heard every

syllable of the short dialogue, and by his fears knew who was meant by

it; but, happy for him, he had no more to speak that scene. When the

first act was over (by the advice of Downs) he went to make his excuse

with--'Indeed, Sir, I had not taken the part, but there was only I

alone out of the play.' 'I! I!' reply'd Betterton, with a smile, 'Thou

art but the tittle of an I.' Griffith seeing him in no ill humour told

him, 'Indians ought to be the best figures on the stage, as nature had

made them.' 'Very like,' reply'd Betterton, 'but it would be a double

death to an Indian cobbler to be conquer'd by such a weazle of a

Spaniard as thou art. And, after this night, let me never see a

truncheon in thy hand again, unless to stir the fire.' ... He took his

advice, laid aside the buskin, and stuck to the sock, in which he made

a figure equal to most of his contemporaries.

"Our genius flutters with the plumes of youth,

But observation wings to steddy truth."

No one can resist telling another story, this time of fat Charles

Hulet, whose abilities were only equalled by his corpulence. Having

been apprenticed to a bookseller, he straightway proceeded to take a

violent interest in the drama, and would often while away the evenings

by spouting Shakespeare and other authors. In lieu of a company to

support him young Hulet would designate each chair in the kitchen to

represent one of the characters in the play he was reciting. "One

night, as he was repeating the part of Alexander, with his wooden

representative of Clytus (an old elbow-chair), and coming to the

speech where the old General is to be kill'd, this young mock

Alexander snatch'd a poker instead of a javelin, and threw it with

such strength against poor Clytus, that the chair was kill'd upon

the spot, and lay mangled on the floor. The death of Clytus made a

monstrous noise, which disturbed the master in the parlour, who called

out to know the reason; and was answered by the cook below, 'Nothing,

sir, but that Alexander has kill'd Clytus.'"

* * * * *

In latter days Hulet took great pride in the sonorous tones of his

voice, and loved nothing more dearly than to steal up behind a man and

startle the unsuspecting one by giving a very loud "Hem." It was a

"Hem," however, which helped to make the actor's winding-sheet, for

one fine day he repeated the trick, burst a blood-vessel, and died

within twenty-four hours.

Heaven bless all these merry vagabonds! We may not always wish to

follow in their footsteps, but we like to keep near them and pry into

their careless, happy lives. When the Bohemians enter a pot-house we

are too virtuous, presumably, to go in likewise, but we stand without,

to get a tempting whiff of hot negus and a snatch of some genial jest

or tuneful song. Then, if our players stray, perchance, into the

gloomy precincts of a pawn-shop, are we not quite prepared to steal up

to the window and discover what tribute is being paid to mine uncle?

And so, speaking of pot-houses, and negus, and pawn-shops, let us end

our extracts from the invaluable Chetwood with this unconventional

reminiscence of another player, Mr. John Thurmond. It was a custom at

that time for persons of the first rank and distinction to give their

birthday suits to the most favoured actors. I think Mr. Thurmond was

honoured by General Ingolsby with his. But his finances being at the

last tide of ebb, the rich suit was put in buckle (a cant word for

forty in the hundred interest). One night, notice was given that the

General would be present with the Government at the play, and all

the performers on the stage were preparing to dress out in the suits

presented. The spouse of Johnny (as he was commonly called) try'd all

her arts to persuade Mr. Holdfast, the pawnbroker (as it fell out, his

real name) to let go the cloaths for that evening, to be returned when

the play was over. But all arguments were fruitless; nothing but

the Ready, or a pledge of full equal value. Such people would have

despised a Demosthenes, or a Cicero, with all their rhetorical

flourishes, if their oratorian gowns had been in pledge. Well! what

must be done? The whole family in confusion and all at their wits-end;

disgrace, with her glaring eyes and extended mouth, ready to devour.

Fatal appearance!

* * * * *

"At last Winny, the wife (that is, Winnifrede), put on a compos'd

countenance (but, alas! with a troubled heart); stepp'd to a

neighbouring tavern, and bespoke a very hot negus, to comfort Johnny

in the great part he was to perform that night, begging to have the

silver tankard with the lid, because, as she said, 'a covering, and

the vehicle silver, would retain heat longer than any other metal,'

The request was comply'd with, the negus carry'd to the playhouse

piping hot, popp'd into a vile earthen mug--the tankard _l'argent_

travelled _incog_. under her apron (like the Persian ladies veil'd),

popp'd into the pawnbroker's hands, in exchange for the suit--put on

and play'd its part, with the rest of the wardrobe; when its duty

was over, carried back to remain in its old depository; the tankard

return'd the right road; and, when the tide flowed with its lunar

influence, the stranded suit was wafted into safe harbour again, after

paying a little for 'dry docking,' which was all the damage received."

* * * * *

And Mr. Chetwood adds:

"Thus woman's wit (tho' some account it evil)

With artful wiles can overreach the Devil."

Among such as these, good, bad and indifferent, moral and otherwise,

did Mistress Oldfield pass what hours she consecrated to the theatre.

In the early years, when merely a poor, struggling postulant before

the altar of fame, the girl must have been more or less intimate with

her dramatic associates, but as time went on and Nance blazed into a

star of the first magnitude, the old feeling of fellowship may have

become weakened. Not that the actress was in any sense snobbish;

rather let it be said that the circumstances of her celebrity proved

quite enough, in the course of human affairs, to separate her from the

other players. Indeed, one of her biographers relates that Oldfield

always went in state to Drury Lane, accompanied by two footmen, and

that she seldom spoke to any one of the actors.[A]

[Footnote A: She always went to the house (_i.e._, the theatre) in the

same dress she had worn at dinner in her visits to the houses of great

people; for she was much caressed on account of her general merit, and

her connection with Mr. Churchill. She used to go to the playhouse in

a chair, attended by two footmen; she seldom spoke to any one of

the actors, and was allowed a sum of money to buy her own

clothes.--"General Biographical Dictionary."]

Nance may have made her entry into the green-room amid royal auspices,

but who can for a second believe that "she seldom spoke to any one

of the actors"? There was in her composition too much of sunshine to

warrant any such belief, and then we know that behind the scenes she

was ever affable and friendly. If she did not brook familiarity which

comes of contempt, and if she moved about among her companions with

dignity, then so much the better.

Of Nance's sweetness of temper and sterling common-sense, Cibber

has left us an attractive memory. It seems that when the Drury Lane

management determined to revive "The Provoked Wife" of Sir John

Vanbrugh (January 1726), Colley suggested that Wilks should take a

rest during the run of the piece, and allow Barton Booth to play the

lover, Constant. The idea did not meet with Wilks' approval; "down

dropt his brow, and fur'd were his features"; and the green-room

became the scene of a violent spat between Cibber and himself, with

Mrs. Oldfield and other members of the company as excited listeners.

Finally the author of the "Apology" said: "Are you not every day

complaining of your being over-labour'd? And now, upon the first

offering to ease you, you fly into a passion, and pretend to make that

a greater grievance than t'other: But, Sir, if your being in or out of

the play is a hardship, you shall impose it upon yourself: The part is

in your hand, and to us it is a matter of indifference now whether you

take it or leave it."

[Illustration: SIR JOHN VANBRUGH By Sir GODFREY KNELLER]

Upon this Mr. Wilks "threw down the part upon the table, crossed

his arms, and sate knocking his heel upon the floor, as seeming to

threaten most when he said least." Hereupon Booth generously yielded

up the much disputed Constant to his rival with the remark that "for

his part, he saw no such great matter in acting every day; for he

believed it the wholsomest exercise in the world; it kept the spirits

in motion, and always gave him a good stomach"--and the elegant

Barton, be it remembered, was a great eater.

* * * * *

"Here," says Cibber, "I observed Mrs. Oldfield began to titter behind

her fan. But Wilks being more intent upon what Booth had said,

reply'd, every one could best feel for himself, but he did not pretend

to the strength of a pack-horse; therefore if Mrs. Oldfield would

chuse anybody else to play with her, he should be very glad to be

excus'd. This throwing the negative upon Mrs. Oldfield was, indeed, a

sure way to save himself; which I could not help taking notice of, by

saying it was making but an ill compliment to the company to suppose

there was but one man in it fit to play an ordinary part with her.

"Here Mrs. Oldfield got up, and turning me half round to come forward,

said with her usual frankness, 'Pooh! you are all a parcel of fools,

to make such a rout about nothing!' Rightly judging that the person

most out of humour would not be more displeased at her calling us all

by the same name. As she knew, too, the best way of ending the debate

would be to help the weak, she said, she hop'd Mr. Wilks would not so

far mind what had past as to refuse his acting the part with her; for

tho' it might not be so good as he had been us'd to, yet she believed

those who had bespoke the play would expect to have it done to the

best advantage, and it would make but an odd story abroad if it were

known there had been any difficulty in that point among ourselves. To

conclude, Wilks had the part."

Verily, Oldfield was a gentlewoman.

The Palmy Days of Nance Oldfield · 第 8 / 11 章