AMMUNITION AND EQUIPMENT

The ammunition which the colonists fired from their guns consisted of

round balls of lead propelled by charges of black powder. The powder

was weak by modern standards and thus comparatively large loads were

used. When it was ignited it gave off clouds of white smoke which

smelled strongly of sulphur. Usually for military purposes a single

ball was used, but sometimes, especially for hunting, a number of small

shot, much like present day buck shot, were used. These were called

swan shot by the men who used them.

There were several ways of carrying this ammunition. The powder was

normally either in a flask or bandolier; the shot in a soft leather

pouch. When going into action, a soldier often took his bullets from

his pouch and put them in his mouth so he could spit them into the

barrel of his gun and save time in loading.

[Illustration: _Powder flasks._]

[Illustration]

The flask was usually a box of wood, often covered with leather and

bound with iron. Normally it was either roughly triangular or shaped

like a flattened horn. There was a nozzle at the end with two valves,

one at the base and one at the end. This enabled the user to measure

out one nozzle-full of powder at a time, and the nozzle was calculated

to hold just about enough powder for a normal load. Usually two flasks

were used, a large one for the propelling charge within the gun, and a

small one holding finer powder for use in the priming pan.

A bandolier was a somewhat more complicated piece of equipment. It

consisted of a leather belt worn over the shoulder from which were

suspended little cylinders of wood, metal or hard leather. Each of

these cylinders held enough powder for one charge. Also attached to the

belt were a bullet pouch and often a small flask for priming powder.

Theoretically the bandolier afforded a faster and more convenient

method of carrying ammunition. Actually, it had many disadvantages.

The cylinders rattled against each other, making so much noise it was

sometimes impossible to hear commands. Occasionally the musket would

become tangled in the loops. And worst of all, hanging in front as they

did, they would sometimes ignite from the musket discharge and the

whole string of charges would explode, which was most unpleasant and

disconcerting to the wearer to say the least. Despite these drawbacks,

bandoliers were quite popular at Plymouth, and they are frequently

mentioned in wills and inventories.

As the 17th century wore on, there came two other developments in the

means of carrying ammunition. The use of flasks made of cows’ horns

increased in popularity as the cattle population grew. Such horn flasks

had been used to some extent by the poorer classes in Europe, but in

America they became very popular because they could be made locally and

did not require great skill or craftsmanship. By the beginning of the

18th century such horn flasks or powder horns as they were then called

completely dominated the flask picture. The other development was the

practice of wrapping charges of powder in cylinders of paper which

could be carried in a pouch. These were the first true cartridges.

They had been used in Europe primarily for mounted troops for several

decades before the Pilgrims landed. Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden is

credited with having been the first general to supply his infantry with

them early in the 17th century. However this may be, paper cartridges

began to appear at Plymouth sometime after 1637, and by the beginning

of King Philip’s War in 1675, they were fairly common. They were not

widely used by European infantry until after 1700.

[Illustration: _Musketeer wearing a bandolier. Note how he pours the

charge from one cylinder down the muzzle. From De Gheyn._]

[Illustration: _Full scale model of a sakeret mounted in Plimoth

Plantation’s reconstruction of the first fort._]

Arms and Armor of the Pilgrims, 1620-1692 · 第 4 / 7 题