BY DR. E. GALLUP.

The second season after moving to Iowa, I had occasion to go to

Postville on the stage. At Decorah we stopped for dinner, and to change

horses. I saw a man in a back yard all bundled and tied up from head to

foot. As I approached to see what was up, he ordered me away, saying

that I would get stung to death, etc. But seeing that he was at work

with bees, I still advanced, but he said very excitedly, “You foolish

man! I tell you to keep away from here, or you will certainly get stung

to death!” I remarked that bees very seldom stung a fool, etc.

On inquiry, I found that he was to receive $5.00 for destroying a very

powerful colony that had been in a large hive for a number of years,

had never swarmed, and had become so vicious and strong in numbers that

it was dangerous to live in the neighborhood.

Here was the largest honey-bees that I ever saw, without an exception.

They looked as though they were a cross between a common honey-bee

and a bumble-bee--large, light-grey, hairy bees, with quite a flat and

stubbed abdomen. Their wings were more like a drone than a worker,

etc. The operator said that they were vicious Italians. One thing was

certain, he went about the operation of destroying them in the most

awkward manner possible.

Now, in this case, and all the cases that I mentioned last week, were

where bees had improved themselves, especially in size of colonies,

working qualities, etc. Thinking the matter over, and dreaming of large

bees, large hives, large colonies, etc., for a long time, led me to

get up the large twin hive that Mr. Doolittle mentions in one of his

articles. My standard hive contained 12 Gallup frames. My first large

hive contained 4 times 12, or 48 frames--24 in front, and 24 in the

rear. The balance of large hives that I made contained 36 frames--18 in

each end. By closing the passages between the two apartments, I could

work two colonies in each hive, if my plan did not work to suit. But I

never worked two in a hive.

My first and earliest natural swarm I hived in the largest hive,

confined them to one end, and used a division-board. As soon as

they commenced building drone-comb, I filled out with ready made

worker-comb, and just before basswood bloom, opened the passage-ways,

filled up with comb, and spread the brood one-half in one end and

one-half in the other. The queen was from my Grimm-Hamlin stock, and

extra prolific, and she spread herself grandly in the laying business.

We had the best and longest basswood bloom that I ever saw, and I took

from that hive, by extracting from one end one day and the other end

the next day, 600 pounds of honey in 30 days--not by actual weight, but

by measure. It was so thick and matured that it all candied in short

order, that I took out that season. I took in all about 750 pounds

for the season, besides what was left in the hive, and it was left

completely full. This was all the product of the bees of one queen.

The following season none of my large colonies swarmed, but all

superseded their queens. Their queen-cells were extra large, and

contained extra-large queens, with the largest amount of royal jelly

left in the cells that I had ever before observed. Now, you had

better believe Gallup “hollowed” and swung his old hat! He had got a

non-swarmer, a great honey-yielder, etc. You could hear him from Maine

to California--through the AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL. In fact, they heard

him in Germany.

But the third season the colonies in large hives were the first to cast

swarms nearly 3 weeks earlier than those in my standard hives, and here

was another dilemma. The swarms were so large that I had to pile up

three standard hives on top of each other, in order to get the bees all

in.

The fourth season they cast swarms again, but here was another

drawback: the fall was an extra open one, and they piled in so much

pollen that they nearly ruined one-half the combs, and then having so

much pollen they got the diarrhea before spring, and dwindled badly.

But I demonstrated one fact, which I believe to be a fact, that one

can rear long-lived queens large and prolific; also that their workers

are longer lived than ordinary, else how could all those extra-large

colonies that I have mentioned, both blacks and Italians, keep up their

extra-large number of workers the entire year?

I forgot to mention that I had two ¾inch holes in the ends of those

hives--one near each side at the top, and when the bees were gathering

so rapidly, one could see the stream in early morning passing out of

those holes, thus demonstrating that evaporation of nectar was going

on very rapidly inside the hive. Water would also be dripping from the

lower entrances. We understand that a portion of that probably was from

the breath of the bees.

Now we have demonstrated, at least to our own satisfaction, that bees

can _certainly_ be improved under judicious and intelligent management

instead of retrograding; and the great wonder to me is, that they have

held their own under the bad management of as large a proportion of

queen-breeders as we formerly had.

Now, Mr. White, your argument that the blacks are superior to Italians

because one can rear black bees from Italians under unnatural and

unfavorable conditions, is about like the argument of the large

queen-breeder that I before mentioned, who claimed that when he tried

to rear queens from the eggs or larvæ just hatched, many of the larvæ

sealed up were not larger than kernels of wheat. You see that he was

rearing them under the greatest possible unfavorable and unnatural

conditions, hence his argument was drawn from false premises.

You can readily see how the old man Gallup hollowed and swung his hat

about his non-swarmer, etc., before he was “out of the woods.” No

wonder that bees are afraid to sting him! I have always held that bees

seldom sting a fool, for that was the most satisfactory answer that I

could give to a majority of people that asked why they did not sting

me. Of course I _have_ another reason, but that is the quickest and

easiest manner of disposing of the question, and proves satisfactory to

a majority of questioners.

By the way, I am asked why, in my method of queen-rearing, I kept

the colony five days before giving the brood. Because the bees were

all young, or nursing-bees, and it takes about that time before a

sufficient number become outside gatherers, and we want all the

favorable conditions possible.

Santa Ana, Calif.

Foul Brood and Its Propagation.

_Written for the American Bee Journal_

The American Bee Journal, Volume XXXIII, No. 2, January 11, 1894 · 第 21 / 53 题