THE SEVERN VALLEY RAILWAY.

The Severn, like other English rivers, may be said to have been the

pioneer of railways along its banks: first, in having done much to

correct the inequalities of the surface; secondly, in having indicated

the direction in which the traffic flowed; so that early in the history

of railway enterprise eminent engineers, like the late Robert Stephenson,

saw the desirability of following its course, and thus meeting the wants

of towns that had grown into importance upon its banks, wants which the

river itself was unable to supply. In 1846 the route was finally

surveyed by Robert Nicholson, with a view to a through traffic in

connection with other railways. The scheme met with opposition from

advocates of rival lines. Ultimately, however, the Bill passed the

committees of the two Houses, and the promoters were successful, whilst

the expenses of counsel and witnesses were enormous. The original

estimate for the line was 600,000 pounds: 110,000 pounds for land, and

490,000 pounds for works. 8,500 pounds was down for a girder bridge at

Arley, 8,000 pounds for one near Quatford, 9,000 pounds for one above

Bridgnorth, and 10,000 pounds for one at Shrewsbury. The two bridges

near Bridgnorth and the one near Shrewsbury were abandoned, and a

considerable saving was effected by shortening the line at Hartlebury, by

a junction, with the Oxford, Wolverhampton, and Worcester higher up than

was originally intended. The estimated cost of the works, in consequence

of these reductions, and of the determination of the company to make it a

single line, was thus reduced to nearly one-half the original sum.

Although the Severn Valley Railway joins the Main Trunk line at

Hartlebury, Worcester is regarded as its proper terminus; and at that

point we commence our description.

Handbook to the Severn Valley Railway Illustrative and Descriptive of Places along the Line from Worcester to Shrewsbury · 第 3 / 34 题