In 1664 King Charles II. raised a corps for sea-service, sty

Produced by Brian Coe, John Campbell and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This

file was produced from images generously made available

by The Internet Archive)

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE

Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.

A superscript is denoted by ^x or ^{xx}, for example S^t or Esq^{re}.

Footnotes are referenced by [number], and have been placed at the

end of each major section.

Some minor changes to the text are noted at the end of the book.

[Illustration:

BY COMMAND OF His late Majesty WILLIAM THE IV^{TH}.

_and under the Patronage of_

Her Majesty the Queen.

HISTORICAL RECORDS,

_OF THE_

British Army

_Comprising the_

_History of every Regiment_

_IN HER MAJESTY'S SERVICE_.

_By Richard Cannon Esq^{re}._

_Adjutant General's Office, Horse Guards._

London.

_Printed by Authority._]

HISTORICAL RECORD

OF

THE SIXTY-SEVENTH,

OR

THE SOUTH HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT,

CONTAINING

AN ACCOUNT OF THE FORMATION OF THE REGIMENT

IN 1758,

AND OF ITS SUBSEQUENT SERVICES

TO 1849.

COMPILED BY

RICHARD CANNON, ESQ.,

ADJUTANT-GENERAL'S OFFICE, HORSE GUARDS.

ILLUSTRATED WITH PLATES.

LONDON:

PARKER, FURNIVALL, & PARKER,

30, CHARING-CROSS.

MDCCCXLIX.

London: Printed by WILLIAM CLOWES and SONS, Stamford Street,

For Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

THE SIXTY-SEVENTH,

OR

THE SOUTH HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT,

BEARS ON THE REGIMENTAL COLOUR THE FIGURE OF THE

"ROYAL TIGER,"

WITH THE WORD "INDIA" SUPERSCRIBED, IN COMMEMORATION OF

ITS SERVICES IN INDIA FROM 1805 TO 1826;

ALSO THE WORD

"BARROSA,"

AS A TESTIMONY OF THE GALLANTRY DISPLAYED BY THE SECOND

BATTALION, AT THE BATTLE OF BARROSA, ON THE 5TH OF MARCH, 1811;

AND THE WORD

"PENINSULA,"

IN COMMEMORATION OF THE SERVICES OF THE SECOND BATTALION,

IN THE EAST OF SPAIN, FROM 1810 TO 1814.

THE SIXTY-SEVENTH,

OR

THE SOUTH HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT.

CONTENTS

OF THE

HISTORICAL RECORD.

YEAR PAGE

INTRODUCTION.

1758 Formation of the Regiment from second battalion

of the Twentieth Regiment 1

---- Appointment of Colonel James Wolfe to the

Colonelcy 2

---- Uniform and Facing of the Regiment --

---- Officers appointed --

1759 Station of the Regiment 3

---- Appointment of Lieut.-Colonel Lord Frederick

Cavendish to the Colonelcy, in succession to

Major-General Wolfe, killed at the Battle of

Quebec --

1760 Decease of King George II., and Accession of

George III. to the Throne --

---- Appointment of Major-General Sir Henry Erskine,

Bart., to the Colonelcy, in succession

to Lord Frederick Cavendish, removed to the

34th Regiment --

1761 Embarked with the expedition under the command

of Major-General Hodgson 4

---- Capture of Belle-Isle 6

1761 Congratulatory address to King George III.

from the Citizens of London 7

---- Appointment of Lieut.-Colonel Hamilton Lambert

to the Colonelcy, in succession to Major-General

Sir Henry Erskine, removed to the

25th Regiment --

1762 Embarked for Portugal 8

1763 Treaty of Peace concluded at Fontainebleau --

---- Embarked to take possession of _Minorca_, on its

being restored to Great Britain 9

1768 Regulations, prescribed by Royal Warrant,

for maintaining uniformity in the clothing,

standards, and colours of regiments, &c. &c. --

1771 Embarked from Minorca for England 10

1773 Proceeded to Scotland --

1774 Appointment of Lieut.-Colonel Edward Maxwell

Brown to the Colonelcy, in succession to

Lieut.-General Hamilton Lambert, deceased --

1775 Embarked for Ireland --

1782 Directed to assume the county title of _South

Hampshire_ Regiment, in addition to its

numerical title --

1785 Embarked for the West Indies --

1794 Returned to England --

---- Proceeded to Ireland --

1796 Embarked for St. Domingo to aid the planters

against the negro inhabitants --

1798 Proceeded to Jamaica 11

1801 Re-embarked for England --

1803 Appointment of Lieut.-General Francis D'Oyly

to the Colonelcy, in succession to General

Edward Maxwell Brown, deceased --

---- Appointment of General Peter Craig to the

Colonelcy, in succession to Lieut.-General

D'Oyly, deceased --

1803 Embarked for Ireland 12

---- A second battalion added to the regiment, and

formed from men raised in Ireland under the

_Army of Reserve_ and _Additional Force_ Acts --

---- First battalion embarked for Guernsey --

1804 ---- ---- embarked for Portsmouth --

---- The regiment augmented to 1200 rank and file --

1805 The first battalion embarked for the East Indies --

---- Arrived at Bengal, and proceeded to Dinapore;

thence to Benares, and to Ghazeepore --

1811 Appointment of Lieut.-General Sir William

Keppel, G.C.B., to the Colonelcy, in succession

to General Peter Craig, deceased --

1813 Marched from Ghazeepore to Cawnpore --

1815 Marched to Meerut 13

1817 Proceeded on field service, and joined the army

of reserve under Major-General Sir David

Ochterlony --

1818 Embarked for Bombay --

---- Six companies embarked for the Concan --

---- Engaged in the siege and capture of _Ryghur_ --

---- Four companies embarked for Surat 14

---- Capture of _Nunderbar_, and other towns and forts --

---- Embarked for the Deccan --

---- Surrender of _Amulneir_ and _Behauderpore_ 15

1819 Proceeded to _Asseerghur_, and joined the force

under General Doveton 16

---- Surrender of the fortress of Asseerghur 18

---- Marched to Mallygaum 21

1820 Proceeded to Sholapore in the Deccan --

1823 Proceeded to Poonah --

1826 Embarked for Calcutta --

---- Embarked for England 22

1826 Arrived at Chatham and proceeded to Windsor --

---- Received the Royal Authority to bear on its

colours and appointments the figure of the

"Royal Tiger," with the word "_India_" superscribed --

1827 Marched from Windsor to Weedon; thence to

Bolton, &c. &c. --

1828 Appointment of Major-General John Macdonald

to the Colonelcy, in succession to General Sir

William Keppel, removed to the 2nd Queen's

Royal Regiment --

1830 Embarked for Ireland 23

1832 Formed into six service and four depôt companies --

---- Service companies embarked for Gibraltar --

1833 Embarked for the West Indies --

1840 Embarked for Canada --

1842 Returned to England, and rejoined by the four

depôt companies 24

1843 Proceeded from Plymouth to Weedon, and thence

to Manchester --

1844 Appointment of Major-General John Clitherow

to the Colonelcy, in succession to Lieut.-General

Sir John Macdonald, G.C.B., removed to the

42nd Regiment --

---- Embarked for Ireland --

1846 Augmented to twelve companies, and formed into

two battalions --

1848 The first and the reserve battalions embarked at

Cork for Gibraltar 25

---- Report of the Governor of Gibraltar on the state

of discipline and efficiency of the regiment --

---- Depôt Company removed from Cork to the Isle

of Wight 26

CONTENTS

OF THE

HISTORICAL RECORD

OF THE SERVICES OF THE

SECOND BATTALION

OF

THE SIXTY-SEVENTH REGIMENT.

YEAR PAGE

1803 Formed from men raised in Ireland under the

Army of Reserve Act 27

1804 Augmented by men raised under the Additional

Force Act 28

---- Embarked for Scotland --

1807 Embarked for Guernsey and Alderney --

1810 Six companies embarked for Gibraltar, and proceeded

from thence to Cadiz --

---- Four companies embarked from Guernsey for

England --

1811 The six companies formed part of the army employed

on an expedition under the command

of Lieut.-General Thomas Graham --

---- Engaged in the Battle of _Barrosa_ 29

---- Medals conferred on the general officers, and

the commanding officers of corps and detachments,

and on the chiefs of military departments,

who were present at the Victory of Barrosa 35

1811 Received the Royal Authority to bear the word

_Barrosa_ on the colours and appointments 36

---- Returned to Cadiz 37

---- Two companies embarked from Portsmouth, and

joined the six companies at Cadiz --

1812 Embarked for Carthagena, and proceeded to Alicant --

1813 Proceeded with the army under Lieut.-General

Sir John Murray against Tarragona 37

---- Capture of Fort San Philippe, in the Col de Balaguer 38

---- Siege of Tarragona raised 39

---- Lieut.-General Lord William Bentinck assumed

the command of the army in the East of Spain, in

succession to Lieut.-General Sir John Murray --

---- Re-embarked for Alicant --

---- Investment and capture of Tarragona --

---- Lieut.-General Lord William Bentinck's services

required in Sicily; and Lieut.-General Wm.

Clinton succeeded to the command of the army 40

---- Marched into quarters at Valls, and thence to

Vendrills --

1814 The French troops under Marshal Suchet withdrew

from Catalonia --

---- The battalion marched to Barcelona, and formed

part of the force for the investment of that place --

---- Hostilities ceased --

---- Napoleon Bonaparte abdicated the throne of France --

---- Louis XVIII. entered Paris, and ascended the throne 41

---- Order expressing the approbation of Field-Marshal

the Marquis of Wellington, of the conduct of the

division of the army employed in the East of Spain --

1814 The battalion proceeded from Barcelona to Tarragona,

and embarked for Gibraltar 41

1815 Return of Napoleon Bonaparte from the Island

of Elba to France --

---- War recommenced --

---- Victory at Waterloo --

---- Surrender of Napoleon Bonaparte, and his conveyance

to St. Helena --

---- The regiment received the Royal Authority to bear the

word _Peninsula_ on the colours and appointments 42

1817 The battalion embarked from Gibraltar for England --

---- Arrived at Chatham, and marched to Canterbury,

where it was disbanded on the 25th of May, 1817 --

Conclusion 43

SUCCESSION OF COLONELS

OF

THE SIXTY-SEVENTH,

OR

THE SOUTH HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT.

YEAR PAGE

1758 James Wolfe 45

1759 Lord Frederick Cavendish 48

1760 Sir Henry Erskine, Bart. --

1761 Hamilton Lambert 49

1774 Edward Maxwell Brown --

1803 Francis D'Oyly 50

1803 Peter Craig 51

1811 Sir William Keppel, G.C.B. --

1828 Sir John Macdonald, G.C.B. 52

1844 John Clitherow --

PLATES.

Costume of the regiment _to face page_ 1

Colours of the regiment 26

Death of Major-General James Wolfe, from wounds

received at the Battle of Quebec, on the 13th of

September, 1759 44

GENERAL ORDERS.

_HORSE-GUARDS_,

_1st January, 1836_.

His Majesty has been pleased to command that, with the view of doing

the fullest justice to Regiments, as well as to Individuals who have

distinguished themselves by their Bravery in Action with the Enemy,

an Account of the Services of every Regiment in the British Army

shall be published under the superintendence and direction of the

Adjutant-General; and that this Account shall contain the following

particulars, viz.:--

---- The Period and Circumstances of the Original Formation of

the Regiment; The Stations at which it has been from time to time

employed; The Battles, Sieges, and other Military Operations in

which it has been engaged, particularly specifying any Achievement

it may have performed, and the Colours, Trophies, &c., it may have

captured from the Enemy.

---- The Names of the Officers, and the number of Non-Commissioned

Officers and Privates Killed or Wounded by the Enemy, specifying

the place and Date of the Action.

---- The Names of those Officers who, in consideration of their

Gallant Services and Meritorious Conduct in Engagements with the

Enemy, have been distinguished with Titles, Medals, or other Marks

of His Majesty's gracious favour.

---- The Names of all such Officers, Non-Commissioned Officers, and

Privates, as may have specially signalized themselves in Action.

And,

---- The Badges and Devices which the Regiment may have been

permitted to bear, and the Causes on account of which such Badges

or Devices, or any other Marks of Distinction, have been granted.

By Command of the Right Honorable

GENERAL LORD HILL,

_Commanding-in-Chief_.

JOHN MACDONALD,

_Adjutant-General_.

PREFACE.

The character and credit of the British Army must chiefly depend

upon the zeal and ardour by which all who enter into its service are

animated, and consequently it is of the highest importance that any

measure calculated to excite the spirit of emulation, by which alone

great and gallant actions are achieved, should be adopted.

Nothing can more fully tend to the accomplishment of this desirable

object than a full display of the noble deeds with which the Military

History of our country abounds. To hold forth these bright examples

to the imitation of the youthful soldier, and thus to incite him to

emulate the meritorious conduct of those who have preceded him in

their honorable career, are among the motives that have given rise to

the present publication.

The operations of the British Troops are, indeed, announced in the

"London Gazette," from whence they are transferred into the public

prints: the achievements of our armies are thus made known at the

time of their occurrence, and receive the tribute of praise and

admiration to which they are entitled. On extraordinary occasions,

the Houses of Parliament have been in the habit of conferring on the

Commanders, and the Officers and Troops acting under their orders,

expressions of approbation and of thanks for their skill and bravery;

and these testimonials, confirmed by the high honour of their

Sovereign's approbation, constitute the reward which the soldier most

highly prizes.

It has not, however, until late years, been the practice (which

appears to have long prevailed in some of the Continental armies)

for British Regiments to keep regular records of their services

and achievements. Hence some difficulty has been experienced in

obtaining, particularly from the old Regiments, an authentic account

of their origin and subsequent services.

This defect will now be remedied, in consequence of His Majesty

having been pleased to command that every Regiment shall, in future,

keep a full and ample record of its services at home and abroad.

From the materials thus collected, the country will henceforth

derive information as to the difficulties and privations which

chequer the career of those who embrace the military profession. In

Great Britain, where so large a number of persons are devoted to

the active concerns of agriculture, manufactures, and commerce, and

where these pursuits have, for so long a period, being undisturbed

by the _presence of war_, which few other countries have escaped,

comparatively little is known of the vicissitudes of active service

and of the casualties of climate, to which, even during peace, the

British Troops are exposed in every part of the globe, with little or

no interval of repose.

In their tranquil enjoyment of the blessings which the country

derives from the industry and the enterprise of the agriculturist

and the trader, its happy inhabitants may be supposed not often to

reflect on the perilous duties of the soldier and the sailor,--on

their sufferings,--and on the sacrifice of valuable life, by which so

many national benefits are obtained and preserved.

The conduct of the British Troops, their valour, and endurance,

have shone conspicuously under great and trying difficulties; and

their character has been established in Continental warfare by the

irresistible spirit with which they have effected debarkations in

spite of the most formidable opposition, and by the gallantry and

steadiness with which they have maintained their advantages against

superior numbers.

In the official Reports made by the respective Commanders, ample

justice has generally been done to the gallant exertions of the

Corps employed; but the details of their services and of acts of

individual bravery can only be fully given in the Annals of the

various Regiments.

These Records are now preparing for publication, under his Majesty's

special authority, by Mr. RICHARD CANNON, Principal Clerk of the

Adjutant General's Office; and while the perusal of them cannot fail

to be useful and interesting to military men of every rank, it is

considered that they will also afford entertainment and information

to the general reader, particularly to those who may have served in

the Army, or who have relatives in the Service.

There exists in the breasts of most of those who have served, or

are serving, in the Army, an _Esprit de Corps_--an attachment to

everything belonging to their Regiment; to such persons a narrative

of the services of their own Corps cannot fail to prove interesting.

Authentic accounts of the actions of the great, the valiant, the

loyal, have always been of paramount interest with a brave and

civilized people. Great Britain has produced a race of heroes who,

in moments of danger and terror, have stood "firm as the rocks

of their native shore:" and when half the world has been arrayed

against them, they have fought the battles of their Country with

unshaken fortitude. It is presumed that a record of achievements in

war,--victories so complete and surprising, gained by our countrymen,

our brothers, our fellow citizens in arms,--a record which revives

the memory of the brave, and brings their gallant deeds before

us,--will certainly prove acceptable to the public.

Biographical Memoirs of the Colonels and other distinguished Officers

will be introduced in the Records of their respective Regiments,

and the Honorary Distinctions which have, from time to time, been

conferred upon each Regiment, as testifying the value and importance

of its services, will be faithfully set forth.

As a convenient mode of Publication, the Record of each Regiment will

be printed in a distinct number, so that when the whole shall be

completed, the Parts may be bound up in numerical succession.

INTRODUCTION

TO

THE INFANTRY.

The natives of Britain have, at all periods, been celebrated for

innate courage and unshaken firmness, and the national superiority

of the British troops over those of other countries has been evinced

in the midst of the most imminent perils. History contains so

many proofs of extraordinary acts of bravery, that no doubts can

be raised upon the facts which are recorded. It must therefore be

admitted, that the distinguishing feature of the British soldier is

INTREPIDITY. This quality was evinced by the inhabitants of England

when their country was invaded by Julius Cæsar with a Roman army,

on which occasion the undaunted Britons rushed into the sea to

attack the Roman soldiers as they descended from their ships; and,

although their discipline and arms were inferior to those of their

adversaries, yet their fierce and dauntless bearing intimidated the

flower of the Roman troops, including Cæsar's favourite tenth legion.

Their arms consisted of spears, short swords, and other weapons of

rude construction. They had chariots, to the axles of which were

fastened sharp pieces of iron resembling scythe-blades, and infantry

in long chariots resembling waggons, who alighted and fought on

foot, and for change of ground, pursuit or retreat, sprang into the

chariot and drove off with the speed of cavalry. These inventions

were, however, unavailing against Cæsar's legions: in the course

of time a military system, with discipline and subordination, was

introduced, and British courage, being thus regulated, was exerted to

the greatest advantage; a full development of the national character

followed, and it shone forth in all its native brilliancy.

The military force of the Anglo-Saxons consisted principally of

infantry: Thanes, and other men of property, however, fought on

horseback. The infantry were of two classes, heavy and light. The

former carried large shields armed with spikes, long broad swords and

spears; and the latter were armed with swords or spears only. They

had also men armed with clubs, others with battle-axes and javelins.

The feudal troops established by William the Conqueror consisted (as

already stated in the Introduction to the Cavalry) almost entirely

of horse; but when the warlike barons and knights, with their trains

of tenants and vassals, took the field, a proportion of men appeared

on foot, and, although these were of inferior degree, they proved

stout-hearted Britons of stanch fidelity. When stipendiary troops

were employed, infantry always constituted a considerable portion of

the military force; and this _arme_ has since acquired, in every

quarter of the globe, a celebrity never exceeded by the armies of any

nation at any period.

The weapons carried by the infantry, during the several reigns

succeeding the Conquest, were bows and arrows, half-pikes, lances,

halberds, various kinds of battle-axes, swords, and daggers. Armour

was worn on the head and body, and in course of time the practice

became general for military men to be so completely cased in steel,

that it was almost impossible to slay them.

The introduction of the use of gunpowder in the destructive purposes

of war, in the early part of the fourteenth century, produced a

change in the arms and equipment of the infantry-soldier. Bows and

arrows gave place to various kinds of fire-arms, but British archers

continued formidable adversaries; and, owing to the inconvenient

construction and imperfect bore of the fire-arms when first

introduced, a body of men, well trained in the use of the bow from

their youth, was considered a valuable acquisition to every army,

even as late as the sixteenth century.

During a great part of the reign of Queen Elizabeth each company

of infantry usually consisted of men armed five different ways; in

every hundred men forty were "_men-at-arms_," and sixty "_shot_;" the

"men-at-arms" were ten halberdiers, or battle-axe men, and thirty

pikemen; and the "shot" were twenty archers, twenty musketeers, and

twenty harquebusiers, and each man carried, besides his principal

weapon, a sword and dagger.

Companies of infantry varied at this period in numbers from 150

to 300 men; each company had a colour or ensign, and the mode of

formation recommended by an English military writer (Sir John Smithe)

in 1590 was:--the colour in the centre of the company guarded by the

halberdiers; the pikemen in equal proportions, on each flank of the

halberdiers: half the musketeers on each flank of the pikes; half

the archers on each flank of the musketeers, and the harquebusiers

(whose arms were much lighter than the muskets then in use) in equal

proportions on each flank of the company for skirmishing.[1] It

was customary to unite a number of companies into one body, called

a REGIMENT, which frequently amounted to three thousand men: but

each company continued to carry a colour. Numerous improvements

were eventually introduced in the construction of fire-arms, and,

it having been found impossible to make armour proof against the

muskets then in use (which carried a very heavy ball) without its

being too weighty for the soldier, armour was gradually laid aside by

the infantry in the seventeenth century: bows and arrows also fell

into disuse, and the infantry were reduced to two classes, viz.:

_musketeers_, armed with matchlock muskets, swords, and daggers; and

_pikemen_, armed with pikes from fourteen to eighteen feet long, and

swords.

In the early part of the seventeenth century Gustavus Adolphus, King

of Sweden, reduced the strength of regiments to 1000 men. He caused

the gunpowder, which had heretofore been carried in flasks, or in

small wooden bandoliers, each containing a charge, to be made up

into cartridges, and carried in pouches; and he formed each regiment

into two wings of musketeers, and a centre division of pikemen. He

also adopted the practice of forming four regiments into a brigade;

and the number of colours was afterwards reduced to three in each

regiment. He formed his columns so compactly that his infantry could

resist the charge of the celebrated Polish horsemen and Austrian

cuirassiers; and his armies became the admiration of other nations.

His mode of formation was copied by the English, French, and other

European states; but so great was the prejudice in favour of ancient

customs, that all his improvements were not adopted until near a

century afterwards.

In 1664 King Charles II. raised a corps for sea-service, styled the

Admiral's regiment. In 1678 each company of 100 men usually consisted

of 30 pikemen, 60 musketeers, and 10 men armed with light firelocks.

In this year the King added a company of men armed with hand grenades

to each of the old British regiments, which was designated the

"grenadier company." Daggers were so contrived as to fit in the

muzzles of the muskets, and bayonets, similar to those at present in

use, were adopted about twenty years afterwards.

An Ordnance regiment was raised in 1685, by order of King James II.,

to guard the artillery, and was designated the Royal Fusiliers (now

7th Foot). This corps, and the companies of grenadiers, did not carry

pikes.

King William III. incorporated the Admiral's regiment in the second

Foot Guards, and raised two Marine regiments for sea-service.

During the war in this reign, each company of infantry (excepting

the fusiliers and grenadiers) consisted of 14 pikemen and 46

musketeers; the captains carried pikes; lieutenants, partisans;

ensigns, half-pikes; and serjeants, halberds. After the peace in 1697

the Marine regiments were disbanded, but were again formed on the

breaking out of the war in 1702.[2]

During the reign of Queen Anne the pikes were laid aside, and every

infantry soldier was armed with a musket, bayonet, and sword; the

grenadiers ceased, about the same period, to carry hand grenades;

and the regiments were directed to lay aside their third colour: the

corps of Royal Artillery was first added to the Army in this reign.

About the year 1745, the men of the battalion companies of infantry

ceased to carry swords; during the reign of George II. light

companies were added to infantry regiments; and in 1764 a Board of

General Officers recommended that the grenadiers should lay aside

their swords, as that weapon had never been used during the Seven

Years' War. Since that period the arms of the infantry soldier have

been limited to the musket and bayonet.

The arms and equipment of the British Troops have seldom differed

materially, since the Conquest, from those of other European states;

and in some respects the arming has, at certain periods, been allowed

to be inferior to that of the nations with whom they have had to

contend; yet, under this disadvantage, the bravery and superiority of

the British infantry have been evinced on very many and most trying

occasions, and splendid victories have been gained over very superior

numbers.

Great Britain has produced a race of lion-like champions who have

dared to confront a host of foes, and have proved themselves valiant

with any arms. At _Crecy_, King Edward III., at the head of about

30,000 men, defeated, on the 26th of August, 1346, Philip King of

France, whose army is said to have amounted to 100,000 men; here

British valour encountered veterans of renown:--the King of Bohemia,

the King of Majorca, and many princes and nobles were slain, and

the French army was routed and cut to pieces. Ten years afterwards,

Edward Prince of Wales, who was designated the Black Prince,

defeated, at _Poictiers_, with 14,000 men, a French army of 60,000

horse, besides infantry, and took John I., King of France, and his

son Philip, prisoners. On the 25th of October, 1415, King Henry

V., with an army of about 13,000 men, although greatly exhausted by

marches, privations, and sickness, defeated, at _Agincourt_, the

Constable of France, at the head of the flower of the French nobility

and an army said to amount to 60,000 men, and gained a complete

victory.

During the seventy years' war between the United Provinces of the

Netherlands and the Spanish monarchy, which commenced in 1578 and

terminated in 1648, the British infantry in the service of the

States-General were celebrated for their unconquerable spirit and

firmness;[3] and in the thirty years' war between the Protestant

Princes and the Emperor of Germany, the British Troops in the

service of Sweden and other states were celebrated for deeds of

heroism.[4] In the wars of Queen Anne, the fame of the British army

under the great MARLBOROUGH was spread throughout the world; and

if we glance at the achievements performed within the memory of

persons now living, there is abundant proof that the Britons of the

present age are not inferior to their ancestors in the qualities

which constitute good soldiers. Witness the deeds of the brave men,

of whom there are many now surviving, who fought in Egypt in 1801,

under the brave Abercromby, and compelled the French army, which had

been vainly styled _Invincible_, to evacuate that country; also the

services of the gallant Troops during the arduous campaigns in the

Peninsula, under the immortal WELLINGTON; and the determined stand

made by the British Army at Waterloo, where Napoleon Bonaparte,

who had long been the inveterate enemy of Great Britain, and had

sought and planned her destruction by every means he could devise,

was compelled to leave his vanquished legions to their fate, and

to place himself at the disposal of the British Government. These

achievements, with others of recent dates, in the distant climes of

India, prove that the same valour and constancy which glowed in the

breasts of the heroes of Crecy, Poictiers, Agincourt, Blenheim, and

Ramilies, continue to animate the Britons of the nineteenth century.

The British Soldier is distinguished for a robust and muscular

frame,--intrepidity which no danger can appal,--unconquerable

spirit and resolution,--patience in fatigue and privation, and

cheerful obedience to his superiors. These qualities, united with

an excellent system of order and discipline to regulate and give

a skilful direction to the energies and adventurous spirit of the

hero, and a wise selection of officers of superior talent to command,

whose presence inspires confidence,--have been the leading causes

of the splendid victories gained by the British arms.[5] The fame

of the deeds of the past and present generations in the various

battle-fields where the robust sons of Albion have fought and

conquered, surrounds the British arms with a halo of glory; these

achievements will live in the page of history to the end of time.

The records of the several regiments will be found to contain a

detail of facts of an interesting character, connected with the

hardships, sufferings, and gallant exploits of British soldiers in

the various parts of the world where the calls of their Country and

the commands of their Sovereign have required them to proceed in the

execution of their duty, whether in active continental operations,

or in maintaining colonial territories in distant and unfavourable

climes.

The superiority of the British infantry has been pre-eminently set

forth in the wars of six centuries, and admitted by the greatest

commanders which Europe has produced. The formations and movements of

this _arme_, as at present practised, while they are adapted to every

species of warfare, and to all probable situations and circumstances

of service, are calculated to show forth the brilliancy of military

tactics calculated upon mathematical and scientific principles.

Although the movements and evolutions have been copied from the

continental armies, yet various improvements have from time to time

been introduced, to insure that simplicity and celerity by which the

superiority of the national military character is maintained. The

rank and influence which Great Britain has attained among the nations

of the world, have in a great measure been purchased by the valour

of the Army, and to persons who have the welfare of their country

at heart, the records of the several regiments cannot fail to prove

interesting.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] A company of 200 men would appear thus:--

__|

| |

|__|

|

20 20 20 30 2|0 30 20 20 20

|

Harquebuses. Muskets. Halberds. Muskets. Harquebuses.

Archers. Pikes. Pikes. Archers.

The musket carried a ball which weighed 1/10th of a pound; and the

harquebus a ball which weighed 1/25th of a pound.

[2] The 30th, 31st, and 32nd Regiments were formed as Marine corps

in 1702, and were employed as such during the wars in the reign of

Queen Anne. The Marine corps were embarked in the Fleet under Admiral

Sir George Rooke, and were at the taking of Gibraltar, and in its

subsequent defence in 1704; they were afterwards employed at the

siege of Barcelona in 1705.

[3] The brave Sir Roger Williams, in his Discourse on War, printed

in 1590, observes:--"I persuade myself ten thousand of our nation

would beat thirty thousand of theirs (the Spaniards) out of the

field, let them be chosen where they list." Yet at this time the

Spanish infantry was allowed to be the best disciplined in Europe.

For instances of valour displayed by the British Infantry during the

Seventy Years' War, see the Historical Record of the Third Foot, or

Buffs.

[4] _Vide_ the Historical Record of the First, or Royal Regiment of

Foot.

[5] "Under the blessing of Divine Providence, His Majesty ascribes

the successes which have attended the exertions of his troops in

Egypt to that determined bravery which is inherent in Britons; but

His Majesty desires it may be most solemnly and forcibly impressed

on the consideration of every part of the army, that it has been a

strict observance of order, discipline, and military system, which

has given the full energy to the native valour of the troops, and

has enabled them proudly to assert the superiority of the national

military character, in situations uncommonly arduous, and under

circumstances of peculiar difficulty."--_General Orders in 1801._

In the General Orders issued by Lieut.-General Sir John Hope

(afterwards Lord Hopetoun), congratulating the army upon the

successful result of the Battle of Corunna, on the 16th of January,

1809, it is stated:--"On no occasion has the undaunted valour of

British troops ever been more manifest. At the termination of a

severe and harassing march, rendered necessary by the superiority

which the enemy had acquired, and which had materially impaired the

efficiency of the troops, many disadvantages were to be encountered.

These have all been surmounted by the conduct of the troops

themselves: and the enemy has been taught, that whatever advantages

of position or of numbers he may possess, there is inherent in

the British officers and soldiers a bravery that knows not how to

yield,--that no circumstances can appal,--and that will ensure

victory, when it is to be obtained by the exertion of any human

means."

[Illustration: SIXTY-SEVENTH REGIMENT.

_Madeley lith. 3 Wellington S^t. Strand_

_For Cannon's Military Records_]

HISTORICAL RECORD

OF

THE SIXTY-SEVENTH,

OR

THE SOUTH HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT OF FOOT.

[Sidenote: 1756]

The French Government having failed to fulfil the conditions

stipulated in the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, and having committed

certain encroachments on the British Territories in North America,

and other acts of aggression, King George II. again prepared for

war, which was proclaimed against France on the 18th of May, 1758.

The Army and Navy were consequently increased, and, among other

augmentations, fifteen of the regiments of infantry were authorised

to raise second battalions from the 25th of August, 1756.[6]

[Sidenote: 1758]

In 1758, these additional battalions were formed into distinct corps,

and numbered from the sixty-first to the seventh-fifth regiments. By

this arrangement the second battalion of the Twentieth regiment was

constituted the SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment, and His Majesty was pleased

to confer the colonelcy on Colonel James Wolfe, on the 21st of April

of that year, from the Twentieth (Kingsley's) regiment in which he

had served from 1749, and which had acquired, under his command,

a high character for its exactness of discipline and other useful

qualities.

The SIXTY-SEVENTH, being thus formed from the Twentieth regiment,

assumed the _pale yellow_ facing as worn by the Twentieth, which it

has since retained.

The following officers were appointed to commissions in the

SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment, on its formation from the 21st of April, 1758.

_Colonel_, James Wolfe from 20th Regt.

_Lieut.-Colonel_, Robert Robinson from 20th Regt.

_Major_, Thomas Bowyer from 14th Foot.

_Captains._

Chas. Veaitch, from 20th Regt.

Edw. Goodenough, ditto

William Delaune, ditto

James Dunne, ditto

Thos. Osborne, from 20th Regt.

John Baldwin, from 51st Regt.

Geo. Sherwin, from 20th Regt.

_Lieutenants._

James Nesbitt, from 20th Regt.

William Dughe, ditto

William Edwards, ditto

Francis Raper, ditto

Freeheville Dykes, ditto

Marmaduke Green, ditto

John Gardner, ditto

John Cane, ditto

Richard Faulkner, ditto

George Smith, from 20th Regt.

William Yorke, ditto

Philip Hales, ditto

Henry Nesbit, ditto

Thos. Wilkinson, ditto

Alexander Rose, ditto

John Matson, ditto

Despard Croasdale, ditto

_Ensigns._

Wm. Massey, from 20th Regt.

Thomas Barker, ditto

Joseph Collings, ditto

Royston Barton, ditto

George Sladdan.

Robert Griffiths.

Thomas Lowe.

_Quarter-Master_, James Kirkman.

_Chaplain_, George Carleton.

_Surgeon_, Joseph Harris, from 20th Regiment.

_Adjutant_, James England, ditto

[Sidenote: 1759]

After its formation as a distinct regiment, the SIXTY-SEVENTH

remained at various stations in England during the years 1759 and

1760. Its Colonel, James Wolfe, had been appointed, in January, 1758,

Brigadier-General in North America, and afterwards distinguished

himself in the operations preceding the capture of _Cape Breton_,

which surrendered on the 26th of July, 1758, and again in the

expedition against _Quebec_, when he died of the wounds received at

the battle on the heights of Abraham, above Quebec, on the 13th of

September, 1759.

On the 24th of October, 1759, His Majesty was pleased to confer

the colonelcy of the SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment on Lieut.-Colonel Lord

Frederick Cavendish, from the First Foot Guards, in succession to

Major-General James Wolfe, deceased.

The decease of King George II. occurred on the 25th of October, 1760,

and on the day following His Majesty George III., grandson of the

late Sovereign, was proclaimed King of Great Britain and Ireland.

[Sidenote: 1760]

On the 30th of October, 1760, His Majesty King George III.

was pleased to remove Colonel Lord Frederick Cavendish to the

Thirty-fourth regiment, and to appoint Major-General Sir Henry

Erskine, Bart., to succeed him as Colonel of the SIXTY-SEVENTH

regiment.

[Sidenote: 1761]

In the spring of 1761 the SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment formed part of

the force selected to proceed, under the command of Major-General

Studholme Hodgson, against _Belle-Isle_, a French island in the Bay

of Biscay, off the coast of Brittany. Major-General Hodgson had the

undermentioned officers and regiments placed under his orders, which

amounted to nearly nine thousand men:--

Major-General John Craufurd; Brigadier-Generals William Rufane,

Hamilton Lambert (afterwards Colonel of the SIXTY-SEVENTH), Guy

Carleton, Honorable William Howe, Robert Douglas, and Philip

Jennings; _Deputy-Adjutant-General_ Lieutenant-Colonel Sir

Thomas Spencer Wilson, Bart.; _Deputy-Quartermaster-General_

Lieutenant-Colonel Lewis Thomas.

REGIMENTS. COMMANDING OFFICERS. MEN.

16th Light Dragoons Lieut.-Col. Burgoyne 200

9th Foot " R. Phillips 800

19th ditto " R. Douglas 800

21st ditto " Edw. Maxwell 800

30th ditto " John Jennings 800

67th ditto " Thomas Shirley 800

69th ditto " Christopher Teesdale 800

76th ditto[7] " D. Erskine 1300

85th ditto, 1st Batt.[7] " Viscount Pulteney 700

90th ditto[7] " Hugh Morgan 500

97th ditto[7] Lieut.-Col. Commandant J. Stuart 600

98th ditto[7] " Major Purcell 600

----

8,700

-----

The expedition appeared before _Belle-Isle_ on the 7th of April, and

a landing was attempted on the following day; but the whole island

appeared like one vast fortress;--the little which nature had left

undone by rocks and crags, having been supplied by art; so that

when the grenadiers gained the shore, the enemy was discovered so

strongly fortified, that no efforts of the few men which could be

landed at once, were of any avail. A boat of Erskine's grenadiers

(SIXTY-SEVENTH), commanded by Captain Thomas Osborne, landed at a

point, and drew up undiscovered. His situation flanked the enemy,

but no other boat followed. The French immediately came out, and

Captain Osborne advanced to meet them. Twice brought to the ground

by a shot, he pressed on, and approached so close to the enemy, that

he exchanged thrusts with the French officer in command. The English

fired, and then charged with the bayonet. The commanders on both

sides were killed, when the English, being without leaders, were

unable to maintain their position.--Attempts to secure a landing

on other points of the island being also unsuccessful, orders were

given to desist from the attempt, and the men returned to the boats,

and proceeded back to their several ships. Many of the boats were

destroyed or damaged in this attempt, and about five hundred men were

lost in killed, wounded, and missing.

Commodore Keppel stated in his letter, of the 13th of April, 1761, to

the Right Honorable Mr. Secretary Pitt, afterwards created the Earl

of Chatham, that

"One of the flat boats landed sixty of Erskine's grenadiers

(SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment), who got up a very difficult place to the

top of the hills, where they formed with great skill, but were so

immediately routed by a much more numerous body of the enemy, that

all attempts to succour them were ineffectual, any further than the

boats bringing from the rocks about twenty of them." On the 8th

of April, 1761, the SIXTY-SEVENTH had Captain Thomas Osborne and

Lieutenant John Gardner killed. Lieutenants Marmaduke Green and

William Herdsman were taken prisoners. The other casualties were, two

serjeants, one drummer, and six rank and file killed; and sixteen

rank and file wounded.

Major-General Hodgson subsequently received the following

reinforcements:--

REGIMENTS. COMMANDING OFFICERS. MEN.

3rd Foot. Major J. Biddulph 800

36th ditto. Lieut.-Col. W. Preston 800

75th ditto[8] " C. Parry 800

85th ditto, 2nd Batt.[8] Major Sir Hugh Williams 600

----

3000

----

and another attempt to effect a landing was resolved upon.

Brigadier-General Hamilton Lambert, on the 22nd of April, 1761,

effected a landing on the rocks near Point Lomaria, where the

difficulty of ascending the precipice had made the enemy least

attentive to that part. Beauclerk's grenadiers (Nineteenth foot),

with Captain Patterson of that regiment, gained the summit before the

enemy saw what was intended, who immediately marched a body of three

hundred men to attack them; the grenadiers, however, maintained their

ground till the remainder of Brigadier Lambert's troops arrived.

The success, thus gained, was promptly followed up; the French

were eventually repulsed, and three brass field-pieces, with a few

prisoners, were captured.

The cannon was afterwards landed from the ships and dragged up the

rocks; the lines which covered the town of Palais were carried by

assault, and the siege of the citadel was prosecuted with vigour.

The garrison under their Governor, the Chevalier de St. Croix, made

a gallant defence, but on the 7th of June were forced to surrender,

and were permitted to march through the breach with the honours of

war in consideration of their bravery. The capture of the island was

thus achieved, with the loss of about eighteen hundred men killed and

wounded.[9]

On the 29th of May, 1761, Major-General Sir Henry Erskine was

removed to the Twenty-fifth regiment, and King George III. was

pleased to promote Lieut.-Colonel Hamilton Lambert, from the

Thirty-first regiment, to the SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment, as a reward for

his gallantry at the capture of Belle-Isle.

[Sidenote: 1762]

While success attended the arms of Great Britain, in various parts

of the world, the Sovereigns of France and Spain were negotiating

a compact, which gave a new turn to the nature of the war; and the

two crowns attempted to coerce Portugal to unite in their designs

against Great Britain. Portugal at this period was particularly weak;

the capital, Lisbon, had been destroyed by an earthquake five years

previously, when nearly thirty thousand inhabitants had been buried

in its ruins. This disaster had been followed by a conspiracy against

the life of the King, while the country was shaken by internal

commotions; at the same time the military force of the kingdom

was weak in numbers, scantily furnished with arms, and without

experienced officers. Notwithstanding these adverse circumstances,

the King of Portugal resolved to adhere to his ancient alliance

with Great Britain; and in consequence of this decision, France and

Spain declared war against him. A powerful Spanish army assembled

on the frontiers, and threatened to crush the Portuguese, when a

military force, with artillery, arms, stores, provisions, and money,

was furnished by Great Britain to assist its faithful ally; and the

SIXTY-SEVENTH, which had returned with the expedition from the coast

of France, was one of the regiments selected for service in Portugal.

The regiment proceeded to Portugal, and continued in that country

until the termination of hostilities by the treaty of Fontainebleau,

the preliminary articles of which were signed by the Duke of Bedford

at Fontainebleau, on the 3rd of November, 1762.

[Sidenote: 1763]

Peace was proclaimed in London on the 22nd of March, 1763, and by

its provisions it was settled that the Island of _Minorca_, which had

been captured by the French in April, 1756, should be restored to

Great Britain. The SIXTY-SEVENTH and the Third foot from Portugal,

the Eleventh, Thirty-third, and Thirty-seventh regiments from

Germany, and the Fifty-seventh from Gibraltar, were embarked in order

to form the garrison of Minorca.[10]

[Sidenote: 1768]

[Sidenote: 1771]

In the Royal Warrant of King George III. dated 19th of December,

1768, containing regulations for the colours, clothing, &c. of the

regiments of foot, it was directed that the regimental colour of the

SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment should be _pale yellow_, being similar to the

colours of the Twentieth regiment, from which it was formed. The

SIXTY-SEVENTH remained on duty at Minorca until July, 1771, when the

Third, Eleventh, and SIXTY-SEVENTH regiments embarked for England,

on being relieved by the Royals (second battalion), the Fifty-first

and Sixty-first regiments.

[Sidenote: 1773]

In the year 1773 the regiment proceeded to Scotland, where it

remained until the year 1775.

[Sidenote: 1774]

On the decease of Lieut.-General Hamilton Lambert in 1774, His

Majesty was pleased to promote Lieut.-Colonel Edward Maxwell Brown,

from the Twenty-first, Royal North British Fusiliers, to the

colonelcy of the SIXTY-SEVENTH regiment, on the 11th of March, 1774.

[Sidenote: 1775]

The regiment embarked for Ireland in 1775, to replace the

Forty-second, Royal Highland regiment, and continued on duty in that

country until the year 1785.

[Sidenote: 1782]

On the 31st of August, 1782, His Majesty directed that the regiment

should be designated the SIXTY-SEVENTH, or the SOUTH HAMPSHIRE

regiment, with a view that a connexion might be cultivated between

the corps and that county, in order to promote the success of the

recruiting service.

[Sidenote: 1785]

Early in the year 1785 the regiment embarked from Ireland for the

West Indies, to relieve the Fifty-fifth regiment.

The regiment proceeded from Barbadoes to Antigua in the autumn of

1785.

[Sidenote: 1788]

During the years 1788, 1789, 1790, 1791, and 1792, the regiment was

stationed at Grenada.

[Sidenote: 1793]

In the year 1793 the regiment was stationed at Barbadoes, and in

July, 1794, returned to Great Britain: the regiment subsequently

proceeded to Ireland.

[Sidenote: 1796]

Historical record of the Sixty-Seventh, or the South Hampshire Regiment Containing an account of the formation of the regiment in 1758, and of its subsequent services to 1849 · 第 1 / 5 段