An Explanation

This book was to have been written in 1914, when I foresaw some leisure

to write it, for I then intended to retire from active editorship. But

the war came, an entirely new set of duties commanded, and the project

was laid aside.

Its title and the form, however, were then chosen. By the form I refer

particularly to the use of the third person. I had always felt the most

effective method of writing an autobiography, for the sake of a better

perspective, was mentally to separate the writer from his subject by

this device.

Moreover, this method came to me very naturally in dealing with the

Edward Bok, editor and publicist, whom I have tried to describe in this

book, because, in many respects, he has had and has been a personality

apart from my private self. I have again and again found myself watching

with intense amusement and interest the Edward Bok of this book at work.

I have, in turn, applauded him and criticised him, as I do in this book.

Not that I ever considered myself bigger or broader than this Edward

Bok: simply that he was different. His tastes, his outlook, his manner

of looking at things were totally at variance with my own. In fact, my

chief difficulty during Edward Bok's directorship of The Ladies' Home

Journal was to abstain from breaking through the editor and revealing my

real self. Several times I did so, and each time I saw how different was

the effect from that when the editorial Edward Bok had been allowed

sway. Little by little I learned to subordinate myself and to let him

have full rein.

But no relief of my life was so great to me personally as his decision

to retire from his editorship. My family and friends were surprised and

amused by my intense and obvious relief when he did so. Only to those

closest to me could I explain the reason for the sense of absolute

freedom and gratitude that I felt.

Since that time my feelings have been an interesting study to myself.

There are no longer two personalities. The Edward Bok of whom I have

written has passed out of my being as completely as if he had never been

there, save for the records and files on my library shelves. It is easy,

therefore, for me to write of him as a personality apart: in fact, I

could not depict him from any other point of view. To write of him in

the first person, as if he were myself, is impossible, for he is not.

The title suggests my principal reason for writing the book. Every life

has some interest and significance; mine, perhaps, a special one. Here

was a little Dutch boy unceremoniously set down in America unable to

make himself understood or even to know what persons were saying; his

education was extremely limited, practically negligible; and yet, by

some curious decree of fate, he was destined to write, for a period of

years, to the largest body of readers ever addressed by an American

editor--the circulation of the magazine he edited running into figures

previously unheard of in periodical literature. He made no pretense to

style or even to composition: his grammar was faulty, as it was natural

it should be, in a language not his own. His roots never went deep, for

the intellectual soil had not been favorable to their growth;--yet, it

must be confessed, he achieved.

But how all this came about, how such a boy, with every disadvantage to

overcome, was able, apparently, to "make good"--this possesses an

interest and for some, perhaps, a value which, after all, is the only

reason for any book.

EDWARD W. BOK

MERION, PENNSYLVANIA, 1920

The Americanization of Edward Bok The Autobiography of a Dutch Boy Fifty Years After · 第 1 / 59 题