IV. 9]

γνῶτε τὰ περὶ ἡμῶν καὶ παρακαλέσῃ τὰς καρδίας ὑμῶν, ^9σὺν Ὀνησίμῳ τῷ

πιστῷ καὶ ἀγαπητῷ ἀδελφῷ, ὅς ἐστιν ἐξ ὑμῶν. πάντα ὑμῖν γνωρίσουσιν τὰ

ὧδε.

γνῶτε τὰ περὶ ἡμῶν] This must be preferred to the received reading, γνῷ

τὰ περὶ ὑμῶν, for two independent reasons. (1) The preponderance of

ancient authority is decidedly in its favour. (2) The emphatic εἰς αὐτὸ

τοῦτο ἵνα seems imperatively to demand it. St Paul in the context twice

states the object of Tychicus’ visit to be that the Colossians might be

informed about the Apostle’s own doings, τὰ κατ’ ἐμὲ πάντα γνωρίσει ὑμῖν

(ver. 7), and πάντα ὑμῖν γνωρίσουσιν τὰ ὧδε. He could hardly therefore

have described ‘the very purpose’ of his mission in the same breath as

something quite different.

It is urged indeed, that this is a scribe’s alteration to bring the

passage into accordance with Ephes. vi. 21. But against this it may

fairly be argued that, on any hypothesis as regards the authorship and

relation of the two letters, this strange variation from γνῶτε τὰ περὶ

ἡμῶν to γνῷ τὰ περὶ ὑμῶν in the author himself is improbable. On the

other hand a transcriber was under a great temptation to substitute γνῷ

for γνῶτε owing to the following παρακαλέση, and this temptation would

become almost irresistible, if by any chance περὶ ὑμῶν had been written

for περὶ ἡμῶν in the copy before him, as we find to be the case in some

MSS. See the detached note on various readings.

παρακαλέσῃ κ.τ.λ.] i.e. ‘encourage you to persevere by his tidings and

exhortations’. The phrase occurs again, Ephes. vi. 22, 2 Thess, ii. 17:

see above ii. 2. The prominent idea in all these passages is not comfort

or consolation but perseverance in the right way.

9. σὺν Ὀνησίμῳ] See above, p. 33, and the introduction to the Epistle to

Philemon.

τῷ πιστῷ κ.τ.λ.] The man whom the Colossians had only known hitherto, if

they knew him at all, as a worthless runaway slave, is thus commended to

them as no more a slave but a brother, no more dishonest and faithless

but trustworthy, no more an object of contempt but of love; comp.

Philem. 11, 16.

γνωρίσουσιν] This form has rather better support from the MSS than

γνωριοῦσιν: see also above, iii. 25. On the Attic future from verbs in

-ιζω in the Greek Testament generally see Winer § xiii. p. 88, A.

Buttmann p. 32 sq. Is there any decisive instance of these Attic forms

in St Paul, except in quotations from the LXX (e.g. Rom. x. 19, xv. 12)?

10–14. ‘I send you greeting from Aristarchus who is a fellow-prisoner

with me; from Marcus, Barnabas’ cousin, concerning whom I have already

sent you directions, that you welcome him heartily, if he pays you a

visit; and from Jesus, surnamed Justus; all three Hebrew converts. They

alone of their fellow-countrymen have worked loyally with me in

spreading the kingdom of God; and their stedfastness has indeed been a

comfort to me in the hour of trial. Greeting also from Epaphras, your

fellow-townsman, a true servant of Christ, who is ever wrestling in his

prayers on your behalf, that ye may stand firm in the faith, perfectly

instructed and fully convinced in every will and purpose of God. I bear

testimony to the earnestness with which he labours for you and the

brethren of Laodicea and those of Hierapolis. Greeting also from Luke

the physician, my very dear friend, and from Demas.’

------------------------------------------------------------------------

St. Paul's Epistles to the Colossians and Philemon A revised text with introductions, notes and dissertations · 第 136 / 241 题