IV. 2–4]

^2Τῇ προσευχῇ προσκαρτερεῖτε, γρηγοροῦντες ἐν αὐτῇ ἐν εὐχαριστίᾳ·

^3προσευχόμενοι ἅμα καὶ περὶ ἡμῶν, ἵνα ὁ Θεὸς ἀνοίξῃ ἡμῖν θύραν τοῦ

λόγου, λαλῆσαι τὸ μυστήριον τοῦ Χριστοῦ, δι’ ὃ καὶ δέδεμαι· ^4ἵνα

φανερώσω

2–6. ‘Be earnest and unceasing in prayer; keep your hearts and minds

awake while praying: remember also (as I have so often told you) that

thanksgiving is the goal and crown of prayer. Meanwhile in your

petitions forget not us—myself Paul—my fellow-labourer Timothy—your

evangelist Epaphras—all the teachers of the Gospel; but pray that God

may open a door for the preaching of the word, to the end that we may

proclaim the free offer of grace to the Gentiles—that great mystery of

Christ for which I am now a prisoner in bonds. So shall I declare it

fearlessly, as I am bound to proclaim it. Walk wisely and discreetly in

all your dealings with unbelievers; allow no opportunity to slip through

your hands, but buy up every passing moment. Let your language be always

pervaded with grace and seasoned with salt. So will you know how to give

a fit answer to each man, as the occasion demands.’

2. προσκαρτερεῖτε] ‘_cling closely to_’, ‘_remain constant to_’ (comp.

Mark iii. 9, Acts viii. 13, x. 7), and so ‘continue stedfast in’. This

word occurs again with τῇ προσευχῇ, ταῖς προσευχαῖς, Acts i. 14, ii. 42,

vi. 4, Rom. xii. 12. The construction is with a simple dative both in

the New Testament (ll. cc.) and in classical writers, except where it

stands absolutely (Acts ii. 46, Rom. xiii. 6). The injunction here

corresponds to the ἀδιαλέιπτως προσεύχεσθε of 1 Thess. v. 17.

γρηγοροῦντες] Long continuance in prayer is apt to produce listlessness.

Hence the additional charge that the heart must be _awake_, if the

prayer is to have any value. The word is not to be taken literally here,

but metaphorically. In Matt. xxvi. 41 etc., γρηγορεῖτε καὶ προσεύχεσθε,

the idea is not quite the same.

ἐν εὐχαριστίᾳ] as the crown of all prayer; see the notes on i. 12, ii.

7.

3. ἡμῶν] ‘_us_’, ‘the Apostles and preachers of the Gospel’, with

reference more especially to Timothy (i. 1) and Epaphras (iv. 12, 13).

Where the Apostle speaks of himself alone, he uses the singular (ver. 3,

4 δέδεμαι, φανερώσω). Indeed there is no reason to think that St Paul

ever uses an ‘epistolary’ plural, referring to himself solely: see the

note on 1 Thess. iii. 1.

ἵνα κ.τ.λ.] On the sense of ἵνα after προσεύχεσθαι etc., see the note on

i. 9.

θύραν τοῦ λόγου] ‘_a door_ of admission _for the word_’, i.e. ‘an

opportunity of preaching the Gospel’, as 1 Cor. xvi. 9 θύρα γάρ μοι

ἀνέῳγεν μεγάλη καὶ ἐνεργής, 2 Cor. ii. 12 θύρας μοι ἀνεῳγμένης ἐν Κυρίῳ:

comp. Plut. _Mor._ p. 674 D ὥσπερ πύλης ἀνοιχθέισης, οὐκ ἀντέσχον ...

συνεισιοῦσι παντοδαποῖς ἀκρόαμασιν. Similarly )έισοδος is used in 1

Thess. i. 9, ii. 1. The converse application of the metaphor appears in

Acts xiv. 27 ἤνοιξεν τοῖς ἔθνεσιν θύραν πίστεως, where the door is

opened not to the teachers, but to the recipients of the Gospel.

According to another interpretation (suggested by Ephes. vi. 19 ἵνα μοι

δοθῇ λόγος ἐν ἀνοίζει τοῦ στόματος μου) it is explained ‘the door of our

speech’, i.e. ‘our mouth’: comp. Ps. cxli (cxl). 3, Mic. vii. 5, Ecclus.

xxviii. 25. But the parallel passages do not favour this sense, nor will

the words themselves admit it. In that case for ἡμῖν θύραν τοῦ λόγου we

should require τὴν θύραν τῶν λόγωυ [ἡμῶν]. ‘The word’ here is ‘the

Gospel’, as frequently.

λαλῆσαι ‘_so as to speak_’, the infinitive of the consequence, like

εἰδέναι ver. 6 ; see Winer § xliv, p. 400.

τὸ μυστήριον κ.τ.λ. i.e. the doctrine of the free admission of the

Gentiles. For the leading idea which St Paul in these epistles attaches

to ‘the mystery’ of the Gospel, see the note on i. 26.

δι’ ὅ St Paul might have been still at large, if he had been content to

preach a Judaic Gospel. It was because he contended for Gentile liberty,

and thus offended Jewish prejudices, that he found himself a prisoner.

See Acts xxi. 28, xxii. 21, 22, xxiv. 5, 6, xxv. 6, 8. The other

reading, δι’ ὅν, destroys the point of the sentence.

καὶ δέδεμαι 2 Tim. ii. 9 μέχρι δεσμῶν, Philem. 9 νυνὶ δὲ καὶ δέσμιος.

4. ἵνα φανερώσω κ.τ.λ. This is best taken as dependent on the previous

clause ἵνα ὁ Θεός ... τοῦ Χριστοῦ. For instances of a double ἵνα, where

the second is not coordinated with, but subordinated to, the first, see

the note on Gal. iii. 14. The immediate purport of the Colossians’

prayers must be that the Apostle should have all opportunities of

preaching the Gospel: the ulterior object, that he should use these

opportunities boldly.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

St. Paul's Epistles to the Colossians and Philemon A revised text with introductions, notes and dissertations · 第 131 / 241 题