I. 27]

ἀπὸ τῶν αἴωνων καὶ ἀπὸ τῶν γενεῶν, νῦν δὲ ἐφανερώθη τοῖς ἁγίοις αὐτοῦ,

^{27}οἷς ἠθέλησεν ὁ Θεὸς γνωρίσαι τί τὸ πλοῦτος τῆς δόξης τοῦ μυστηρίου

τούτου ἐν τοῖς

ἀπὸ τῶν αἴωνων κ.τ.λ.] The preposition is doubtless temporal here, being

opposed to νῦν, as in the parallel passage, Ephes. iii. 9: comp. Rom.

xvi. 25 κατὰ ἀποκάλυψιν μυστηρίωυ _χρόνοις αἰωνίοις_ σεσιγημένου, 1

Cor. ii. 7 Θεοῦ σοφίαν ἐν μυστηρίῳ τὴν ἀποκεκρυμμένην ἣν προώρισεν ὁ

Θεὸς _πρὸ τῶν αἰώνων_. So too ἀπ’ αἰῶνος, Acts iii. 21, xv. 18, Ps.

xcii. 3, etc.; ἀπὸ καταβολῆς κόσμου, Matt. xiii. 35, xxv. 34, etc.

τῶν γενεῶν] An αἲων is made up of many γενεαί; comp. Ephes. iii. 21 εἰς

πάσας τὰς γενεὰς τοῦ αἰῶνος τῶν αἰώνων, Is. li. 9 ὡς γενεὰ αἰῶνος (where

the Hebrew has the plural ‘generations’). Hence the order here. Not only

was this mystery unknown in remote periods of antiquity, but even in

recent generations. It came upon the world as a sudden surprise. The

moment of its revelation was the moment of its fulfilment.

27. ἠθέλησεν] ‘_willed_,’ ‘_was pleased_.’ It was God’s grace: it was no

merit of their own. See the note on i. 1 διὰ θελήματος Θεοῦ.

νῦν δὲ κ.τ.λ.] An indicative clause is substituted for a participial,

which would otherwise have been more natural, for the sake of

emphasizing the statement; comp. ver. 22 νυνὶ δὲ ἀποκατηλλάγητε, and see

Winer § lxiii. p. 717.

τὸ πλοῦτος] The ‘_wealth_ of God,’ as manifested in His dispensation of

grace, is a prominent idea in these epistles; comp. ii. 2, Ephes. i. 7,

18, iii. 8, 16; comp. Rom. xi. 33. See above p. 43 sq. St Paul uses the

neuter and the masculine forms indifferently in these epistles (e.g. τὸ

πλοῦτος Ephes. i. 7, ὁ πλοῦτος Ephes. i. 18), as in his other letters

(e.g. τὸ πλοῦτος 2 Cor. viii. 2, ὁ πλοῦτος Rom. ix. 23). In most

passages however there are various readings. On the neuter forms τὸ

πλοῦτος, τὸ ζῆλος, etc., see Winer § ix. p. 76.

τῆς δόξης] i.e. ‘of the glorious manifestation.’ This word in

Hellenistic Greek is frequently used of a bright light; e.g. Luke ii. 9

περίελαμψεν, Acts xxii. 11 τοῦ φωτός, 1 Cor. xv. 41 ἡλίου, σελήνης, etc.

2 Cor. iii. 7 τοῦ προσώπου [Μωυσέως]. Hence it is applied generally to a

divine _manifestation_, even where there is no physical accompaniment of

light; and more especially to the revelation of God in Christ (e.g. Joh.

i. 14, 2 Cor. iv. 4, etc.). The expression πλοῦτος τῆς δόξης occurs

again, Rom. ix. 23, Ephes. i. 18, iii. 16. See above ver. 11 with the

note.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

St. Paul's Epistles to the Colossians and Philemon A revised text with introductions, notes and dissertations · 第 69 / 241 题