There must often have come to him the temptation to break loose from a

people who deserved nothing of him, but cruelly entreated him, and who

themselves were so manifestly doomed. Once at least he confesses this.

O that I had in the wilderness IX. 2

A wayfarers’ lodge!

Then would I leave my people,

And get away from them;

For adulterers all of them be,

A bundle of traitors.

They stretch their tongues 3

Like a falsing bow,

And never for truth

Use their power in the land.

But from evil to evil go forth

And Me they know not!(739)

Well might the Prophet wish to escape from such a people—worn out with

their falsehood, their impurity, and their senseless optimism. Yet it is

not solitude for which he prays but some inn or caravanserai where he

would have been less lonely than in his unshared house in Jerusalem,

_sitting alone because of the wrath of the Lord_. His desire is to be set

where a man may see all the interest of passing life without any

responsibility for it, where men are wayfarers only and come and go like a

river on whose bank you lie, and help you to muse and perhaps to sing but

never touch the heart or the conscience of you. It is the prayer of a poet

sick of being a prophet and a tester. Jeremiah was weary of having to look

below the surface of life, to know people long enough to judge them with a

keener conscience than their own and to love them with a hopeless and

breaking heart that never got an answer to its love or to its calls for

repentance—wearied with watching habit slowly grow from ill to ill, old

truths become lies or at the best mere formalities, prophets who only

flattered, priests to bless them, and the people loving to have it

so.(740) O to have no other task in life than to watch the street from the

balcony!

But our prayers often outrun themselves in the utterance and Jeremiah’s

too carried with it its denial. _My people—that I might leave my

people_—this, it is clear from all that we have heard from him, his heart

would never suffer him to do. And so gradually we find him turning with

deeper devotion to the forlorn hope of his ministry, his fate to feel his

judgment of his people grow ever more despairing, but his love for them

deeper and more yearning.

From the year of Carchemish onward he appears not again to have tried or

prayed to escape. Through the rest of the reign of Jehoiakim they

persecuted him to the edge of death. Prophets and priests called for his

execution. He was stoned, beaten and thrust into the stocks. The king

scornfully cut up the roll of his prophecies; and the people following

their formalist leaders rejected his word. With the first captivity under

Jehoiakim all the better classes left Jerusalem, but he elected to remain

with the refuse. When in the reign of Ṣedekiah the Chaldeans came down on

the city and Jeremiah counselled its surrender he was again beaten and was

flung into a pit to starve to death. When he was freed and the besiegers

gave him the opportunity, he would not go over to them. Even when the city

had fallen and her captors hearing of his counsel offered him security and

a position in Babylonia, he chose instead to share the fortunes of the

little remnant left in their ruined land. When they broke up it was the

worst of them who took possession of his person and disregarding his

appeals hurried him down to Egypt. There, on alien soil and among

countrymen who had given themselves to an alien religion, the one great

personality of his time, who had served the highest interests of his

nation for forty years, reluctant but unfaltering, and whose scorned

words, every one, had been vindicated by events, is with the dregs of his

people swept from our sight. _He had given his back to the smiters and his

cheeks to them who plucked out the hair; he had not hidden his face from

the shame and the spitting. He was a man of sorrows and acquainted with

grief. He was taken from prison and from judgment and cut off from the

land of the living; and they made his grave with the wicked, though he had

done no violence neither was deceit in his mouth._ It is the second

greatest sacrifice that Israel has offered for mankind.

If Jeremiah thus of his own will suffered _with_ his people, and to the

bitter end with the worst of them, was he also conscious of suffering

_for_ them? After his death, when the full tragedy of his life came home

to his people’s heart, the sense of the few suffering for the many, the

righteous for the sinners, began to be articulate in Israel—remarkably

enough, let us remember, in the very period when owing to the break-up of

the nation the single soul came to its own and belief in the

responsibility of every man for his own sins also emerged and prevailed.

Of the influence of the example of Jeremiah’s spiritual loneliness,

combined with his devotion to his sinful people, in developing these

doctrines of individualism and self-sacrifice for others there can be no

doubt. The stamp of his sufferings is on every passage in that exilic work

“Isaiah” XL-LXVI, which presents the Suffering Servant of the Lord and

declares the atoning virtues of His Agonies and Death.

But it is not clear that Jeremiah ever felt anything of this about

himself; if he did so he has refrained from uttering it. Yet he must have

been very near so high a consciousness. His love and his pity for his

sinful people were full. He can hardly have failed to descry that his own

spiritual agonies which brought him into so close a personal communion

with God would show to every other man the way for his approach also to

the Most High and Holy and his reconciliation with his God. Again he was

weighed down with his people’s sins; he bore on his heart the full burden

of them. He confessed them. The shame which the people did not feel for

them, he felt; and he painted the curse upon them in words which prove how

deeply the iron had entered his own soul. He had a profound sense of the

engrained quality of evil,(741) the deep saturation of sin, the enormity

of the guilt of those who sinned against the light and love of God.(742) A

fallacy of his day was that God could easily and would readily forgive

sin, that the standard ritual might at once atone for it and comfortable

preaching bring the assurance of its removal. He denied this, and affirmed

that such things do not change character; that no wash of words can

cleanse from sin, no sacraments, however ancient, can absolve from

guilt.(743) That way only strict and painful repentance can work;

repentance following the deep searching of the heart by the Word and the

Judgments of God and the agony of learning and doing His Will.(744) To its

last dregs he drank the cup of the Lord’s wrath upon His false and wilful

nation; he suffered with them every pang of the slow death their sins had

brought upon them. And yet he was most conscious of his own innocence when

most certain of his fate. The more he loyally gave himself to his mission

the more he suffered and the nearer was he brought to death. The tragedy

perplexed him,

Why is my pain perpetual,

My wound past healing?(745)

The only reply he heard from heaven was the order to stand fast, for God

was with him to deliver—but that more troubles awaited him. And beyond

this what is there to answer the staggering Prophet save that if a man

have the Divine gifts of a keener conscience and a more loving heart than

his fellows, there inevitably comes with such gifts the obligation of

suffering for them. Every degree in which love stands above her brethren

means pain and shame to love though as yet she bear no thorn or nail in

her flesh. This spiritual distress Jeremiah felt for the people long

before he shared with them the physical penalties of their sins. Just

there—in his keener conscience, in his hot shame for sins not his as if

they were his, in his agony for his people’s estrangement from God and in

his own constantly wounded love—lay his real substitution, his vicarious

offering for his people.

Did Jeremiah ever conceive the far-off fulness of the travail thus laid

upon his soul, the truth that this vicarious agony of a righteous man for

the sins of others is borne by God Himself? To that question we have only

fragments of an answer. In his discourses, both earlier and later, when he

talks directly in the Name of the Deity—when the Deity speaks in the first

person—the words breathe as much effort and passion as when Jeremiah

speaks in his own person. The Prophet is very sure that his God is Love,

and he hears that love utter itself in tones of yearning for the love of

men, and even of agony for their sin and misery. There is, too, a singular

prayer of his which is tense with the instinct, that God would surely be

to Israel what Jeremiah had resolved and striven to be—not a far-off God

who occasionally visited or passed through His people, but One in their

midst sharing their pain; not indifferent, as he fears in another

place,(746) to the shame that is upon them, but bearing even this. The

prayer which I mean is the one in XIV. 8, 9, which recalls not only the

terms but the essence of Jeremiah’s longing to escape from his people, and

lodge afar with wayfaring men, aloof and irresponsible.

O Hope of Israel, His Saviour

In time of trouble.

Why be like a passenger through the land,

Or the wayfaring guest of a night?

Yet Lord Thou art in our midst,

Do not forsake us.(747)

I may be going too far in interpreting the longing and faith that lie

behind these words. But they come out very fully in later prophets who

explicitly assert that the Divine Nature does dwell with men, shares their

ethical warfare and bears the shame of their sins. And the truth of it all

was manifested past doubt in the Incarnation, the Passion and the Cross of

the Son of God.

But whether Jeremiah had instinct of it, as I have ventured to think from

his prayer, or had not, he foreshadowed, as far as mere man can, the

sufferings of Jesus Christ for men—and this is his greatest glory as a

prophet.

Lecture VIII.

GOD, MAN AND THE NEW COVENANT.

We have followed the career of Jeremiah from his call onwards to the end,

and we have traced his religious experience with its doubts, struggles,

crises, and settlement at last upon the things that are sure: his debates

with God and strifes with men, which while they roused him to outbursts of

passion also braced his will, and stilled the wilder storms of his heart.

There remains the duty of gathering the results of this broken and gusty,

yet growing and fruitful experience: the truths which came forth of its

travail, about God and Man and their relations. And in particular we have

still to study the ideal form which Jeremiah, or (as some questionably

argue) one of his disciples, gave to these relations: the New Covenant,

new in contrast to God’s ancient Covenant with Israel as recorded and

enforced in the Book of Deuteronomy.

1. God.

Among the surprises which Jeremiah’s own Oracles have for the student is

the discovery of how little they dwell upon the transcendent and infinite

aspects of the Divine Nature. On these Jeremiah adds almost nothing to

what his predecessors or contemporaries revealed. Return to his original

visions and contrast them with those, for example, of Isaiah and Ezekiel.

Isaiah’s vision was of the Lord upon a Throne, high and lifted up,

surrounded by Seraphim crying to one another, _Holy, Holy, Holy is the

Lord of Hosts! the whole earth is full of His Glory!_ And their voices

rocked the Temple and filled it with smoke. Here are a Presence, Awful

Majesty, Infinite Holiness and Glory, blinding the seer and crushing his

heart contrite. Or take the inaugural vision of Ezekiel—the storm-wind out

of the North, the vast cloud, the fire infolding itself, the brightness

round about and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber; the rush

and whirl of life that followed, wheels and wings and rings full of eyes;

and over this the likeness of a firmament of the colour of the terrible

ice and the sound of wings like the noise of many waters, as the Voice of

the Almighty and above the firmament a Throne and on the Throne the

Appearance of a Man, the Appearance of the likeness of the Glory of the

Lord. _And I, when I saw it, fell upon my face._

In the inaugural visions of Jeremiah there is none of this Awfulness—only

_What art thou seeing Jeremiah? the branch of an almond tree ... a caldron

boiling._ That was characteristic of his encounters and intercourse with

the Deity throughout. They were constant and close, but in them all we are

aware only of a Voice and an Argument. There is no Throne, no Appearance,

no Majesty, no overwhelming sense of Holiness and Glory, no rush of wings

nor floods of colour or of song.(748) Jeremiah takes for granted what

other prophets have said of God. But the Deity whose Power and Glory they

revealed is his Familiar. The Lord talks with Jeremiah as a man with his

fellow.

For this there were several reasons, and first the particular quality of

the Prophet’s imagination. His native powers of vision were not such as

soar, or at any rate easily soar, to the sublime. He was a lyric poet and

his revelations of God are subjective and given to us by glimpses in

scattered verses, which, however intimate and exquisite, have not the

adoring wonder of his prophetic peers.

Again there were the startled recoil of his nature from the terrible

office of a prophet in such times, and those born gifts of questioning and

searching which fitted him for his allotted duty as Tester of his

people,(749) but which he also turned upon the Providence and Judgments of

the Lord Himself.(750) His religious experience, as we have seen, was

largely a struggle with the Divine Will, and it left him not adoring but

amazed and perplexed. Such wrestling man’s spirit has to encounter like

Jacob of old in the dark, and if like the Patriarch it craves the Name,

which is the Nature, of That with which it struggles, all the answer it

may get is another question, _Wherefore askest thou after My Name?_

Morning may break, as it broke on Jacob by Jabbok with the assurance of

blessing or as on Jeremiah with a firmer impression of the Will not his

own; but no strength is left to glory in the Nature behind the Will. There

is a horrified breathlessness about his lines—

Thou wast stronger than I and hast conquered,

The Lord is with me as a Mighty and Terrible.(751)

From his struggles he indeed issues more sure of God and finally more

trustful in Him, as is testified by his fair song on the beauty and

fruitfulness of faith, beginning

Blessed the wight that trusts in the Lord,

And the Lord is his trust.(752)

But even here is none of the awe and high wonder which fall upon Israel

through other prophets. Lyrist as he is and subjective, Jeremiah dwells

not so much upon the attributes of God on which faith rests as upon the

effects of faith in man.

Again by the desperate character of the times he was starved of hope, the

hope by which the Apostle says _we are saved_, which not only braces the

will but clears the inner eyes of men and liberates the imagination. As

the years went on he was ever more closely bound to the prediction of his

people’s ruin, and, when this came, to the sober counsel to accept their

fate and settle down to a long exile in patience for the Lord’s time of

deliverance. As we have seen, his intervals of release from so grim a

ministry were brief, and his Oracles of a bright future but few. Even in

these he does not rise, like the Evangelist of the Exile whom he inspired,

to exultation in the Almighty Power of God or to visions of vast spaces of

the Divine Providence, or of Israel’s service wide as the world. His happy

peasant-heart is content to foresee his restored people tending their

vineyards again, enjoying their village dances and festivals, and sharing

with their long divided tribes the common national worship upon Ṣion.(753)

Like those of all the prophets Jeremiah’s most immediate convictions of

God are that He has done, and is always doing or about to do, things.(754)

From the first Yahweh of Israel had been to the faith of his people a God

of Deeds. He delivered them from Egypt, led them through the desert, ever

ready to avenge them on any who molested them, and He had brought them to

a land of delight.(755) By his creative and guiding Word, always clear and

potential,(756) He had planted them and built them up to be a nation.

These were the proofs of Him—ever operative, effective and victorious both

over their foes and over every natural obstacle which their life

encountered. And being _the Living God_ He still works and is ready to

work, would His people only seek where!(757) He is awake, watching over

His Word _to perform it_ and controlling the nations.(758) It is He who

has made the earth and gives it to whom He will,(759) who prepares the

destroyers of His people, who calls for the kingdoms of the North, even

for the far Scythians beyond the edge of the world, to execute His

purposes.(760) He brings the King of Babylon against Jerusalem, and

recalls the Chaldeans to their interrupted siege of the city, gives it

into their hands and Himself banishes its people.(761) He moulds the

nations for his own ends, and if they fail Him, decrees their

destruction.(762) His Word builds and plants but also pulls up and tears

down.(763) He is always near to guide or to argue with nations and

individuals, and to give directions and suggestions of practical detail to

His servants for the interpretation and fulfilment of His purposes.(764)

It was all this activity and effectiveness, with their sure results in

history, which distinguished Him from other gods, the gods of the nations,

who were ineffective, or as Jeremiah puts it _unprofitable—no-gods,

nothings_ and _do-nothings, the work of men’s hands, lies_ or _frauds_,

and mere _bubbles_.(765) On this line Jeremiah’s monotheism marks a

notable advance; for alongside of faith in the Divine Unity and

Sovereignty there had lingered even in Deuteronomy a belief in the

existence of other gods.(766) With Jeremiah every vestige of this

superstition is gone, and other gods consigned to limbo once and for all.

Yet Jeremiah’s monotheism, like that of all the Hebrew prophets, is even

more due to convictions of the character of the God of Israel. We have

seen how he dwells on the Divine Love, faithful and yearning for love in

return, pleading and patient even with its delinquent sons and

daughters;(767) but equal to this is his emphasis on the righteousness of

the Most High, by all His deeds _working troth, justice, and judgment on

the earth_, which are His delight and the knowledge of which is man’s only

glory.(768) He demands from His people not sacrifices, which He never

commanded to their fathers, nor vows but a better life, justice between

man and man, and care for the weak and the innocent.(769) To know Him is

to do justice and right.(770) Because the present generation have fallen

away from these, and practise and love falsehood, slander, impurity,

treacherous and greedy violence, therefore God, being justice and truth,

must judge and condemn them: _What else can I do?_(771) The ethical

necessity of the doom of the people is clear to the Prophet from a very

early stage of his ministry,(772) and throughout, though his heart

struggles against it. But, if possible, even more abhorrent to God than

these sins against domestic and civic piety in themselves, is the fact

that they are committed in the very face of His Love and despite all its

pleading. With Jeremiah as with Hosea the sin against love is the most

hopeless and unpardonable, and this people have sinned it to the utmost.

As a woman is false to her fere,

Have ye been false to me.(773)

Hence most deeply springs the Wrath of the Lord, a Wrath on which Jeremiah

broods and explodes more frequently and fiercely than any other prophet:

_I am full of the rage of the Lord; the glow of His wrath; take the cup of

the wine of this fury at My hand and give all nations to whom I send thee

to drink of it; the fierce anger of the Lord shall not turn until He have

executed it._(774) And He does execute it. God’s Wrath breaks out in His

_spurning_ of His nation, in the hot names He calls it, _adulteress_ and

_harlot_, and in _hating_ it.(775) He will not relent nor pardon it, nor

listen to prayer for it.(776) He says, _I must myself take vengeance upon

them. I shall not spare nor pity them._(777) They will reel in the day of

their visitation. He will feed them with wormwood and drug them with

poison; He will suddenly let fall on them anguish and terrors; He will

take His fan and winnow them out in the gates of the land and as the

passing chaff strew them on the wind of the desert; the garden-land

withers to wilderness and its cities break down at His presence and before

His fierce anger; He will make Jerusalem heaps and cast out the people

before His face. He will give them to be tossed among the nations for a

consternation, a reproach and a proverb, for a taunt and a curse, in all

places whither He drives them: and will send after them the sword, the

famine, and the pestilence till they be consumed.(778)

The modern mind deems arbitrary such immediate linking of physical and

political disasters with the Wrath of God against sin. But we have to

ponder the following. The Prophet was convinced of the ethical necessity

of that Wrath and of its judgments on Judah—he was convinced before they

came to pass and he predicted them accurately, from close observation of

the political conditions of his world and the character of his people.

Granted these and God’s essential and operative justice, the connection

was natural: _What else can I do?_ It was clear that Judah both deserved

and needed punishment and equally clear that the boiling North held the

potentialities of this, which were gradually shaping and irresistibly

approaching. Moreover, as Jeremiah insists, and as the history both of

nations and individuals has frequently illustrated, there is a natural

sequence of disaster upon wrong-doing. _Be thy scourge thine own sin! Thy

ways and thy deeds have done to thee __ these things. Is it Me they

provoke, saith the Lord, Is it not themselves to the confusion of their

faces? Wherefore have these things come upon thee?—for the mass of thy

wickedness._(779) As St. Paul says _the wages of sin_, not the judge’s

penalty on sin but the thing it naturally earns, _is death_. Now one of

Jeremiah’s most acute and convincing experiences as the _Tester_ of his

people,(780) is his observation of how all this worked out upon his own

generation. Not only were the war, the pestilence, and the captivity,

which were about to fall upon Jerusalem, directly and obviously due to the

perjury and stupid pride of her rulers; but, as he more subtly saw, the

immorality of the whole people had been disabling them, for years before,

from meeting these or any disasters except as sheer punishment without

place for repentance. Their previous troubles had failed to sober or

humble them or rouse them. _They would not accept correction_, he says of

them more than once.(781) To the Prophet’s warnings that God will judge

them, they answer carelessly or defiantly _Not He!_ Instead of yielding to

the power which lies in all adversity to cleanse the heart and brace the

will they became incapable of shame, indifferent to consequences, and so

past praying for.(782) And in this they were fortified by the specious

dreams and lies of their false prophets, continued to sin, and so fell to

their doom, abashed at last but unassoilable.(783) If at any time they

were startled by disaster, this found them too enfeebled even for

repentance by their habitual insincerity or self-indulgence; which made

them incapable of truth even under pain, and of a real conversion to

God.(784) All this is discovered to us by the eyes and the mouth of

Jeremiah. What in it is arbitrary? The record is awful, nothing like it in

literature. Yet every step is real. We follow a master of observation.

Jeremiah : Being The Baird Lecture for 1922 · 第 15 / 20 段