Again, this line--

"Shone every pillar foliage-bound"--

suggests to the mind the profusion and elaborateness of the leafy

decorations in the inside. Among these, one pillar, garlanded with

spiral wreaths of carved foliage, is called the "Apprentice's Pillar;"

the tradition being, that while the master was gone to Rome to get some

further hints on executing the plan, a precocious young mason, whom he

left at home, completed it in his absence. The master builder summarily

knocked him on the head, as a warning to all progressive young men not

to grow wiser than their teachers. Tradition points out the heads of the

master and workmen among the corbels. So you see, whereas in old Greek

times people used to point out their celebrities among the stars, and

gave a defunct hero a place in the constellations, in the middle ages he

only got a place among the corbels.

I am increasingly sorry that I was beguiled out of my personal

examination of this chapel, since I have seen the plates of it in my

Baronial Sketches. It is the rival of Melrose, but more elaborate; in

fact, it is a perfect cataract of architectural vivacity and ingenuity,

as defiant of any rules of criticism and art as the leaf-embowered

arcades and arches of our American forest cathedrals. From the

comparison of the plates of the engravings, I should judge there was

less delicacy of taste, and more exuberance of invention, than in

Melrose. One old prosaic commentator on it says that it is quite

remarkable that there are no two cuts in it precisely alike; each

buttress, window, and pillar is unique, though with such a general

resemblance to each other as to deceive the eye.

It was built in 1446, by William St. Clair, who was Prince of Orkney,

Duke of Oldenburgh, Lord of Roslin, Earl of Caithness and Strathearn,

and so on _ad infinitum_. He was called the "Seemly St. Clair," from his

noble deportment and elegant manners; resided in royal splendor at this

Castle of Roslin, and kept a court there as Prince of Orkney. His table

was served with vessels of gold and silver, and he had one lord for his

master of household, one for his cup bearer, and one for his carver. His

princess, Elizabeth Douglas, was served by seventy-five gentlewomen,

fifty-three of whom were daughters of noblemen, and they were attended

in all their excursions by a retinue of two hundred gentlemen.

These very woods and streams, which now hear nothing but the murmurs of

the Esk, were all alive with the bustle of a court in those days.

The castle was now distinctly visible; it stands on an insulated rock,

two hundred and twenty yards from the chapel. It has under it a set of

excavations and caverns almost equally curious with those of

Hawthornden; there are still some tolerably preserved rooms in it, and

Mrs. W. informed me that they had once rented these rooms for a summer

residence. What a delightful idea! The barons of Roslin were all buried

under this Chapel, in their armor, as Scott describes in the poem. And

as this family were altogether more than common folks, it is perfectly

credible that on the death of one of them a miraculous light should

illuminate the castle, chapel, and whole neighborhood.

It appears, by certain ancient documents, that this high and mighty

house of St. Clair were in a particular manner patrons of the masonic

craft. It is known that the trade of masonry was then in the hands of a

secret and mysterious order, from whom probably our modern masons have

descended.

The St. Clair family, it appears, were at the head of this order, with

power to appoint officers and places of meeting, to punish

transgressors, and otherwise to have the superintendence of all their

affairs. This fact may account for such a perfect Geyser of

architectural ingenuity as has been poured out upon their family chapel,

which was designed for a _chef-d'oeuvre_, a concentration of the best

that could be done to the honor of their patron's family. The documents

which authenticate this statement are described in Billings's Baronial

Antiquities. So much for "the lordly line of high St. Clair."

When we came back to the house, and after taking coffee in the drawing

room, Miss S. took me over the interior, a most delightful place, full

of all sorts of out-of-the-way snuggeries, and comfortable corners, and

poetic irregularities. There she showed me a picture of one of the early

ancestors of the family, the poet Drummond, hanging in a room, which

tradition has assigned to him. It represents a man with a dark,

Spanish-looking face, with the broad Elizabethan ruff, earnest,

melancholy eyes, and an air half cavalier, half poet, bringing to mind

the chivalrous, graceful, fastidious bard, accomplished scholar, and

courtier of his time, the devout believer in the divine right of kings,

and of the immunities and privileges of the upper class generally. This

Drummond, it seems, was early engaged to a fair young lady, whose death

rendered his beautiful retreat of Hawthornden insupportable to him, and

of course, like other persons of romance, he sought refuge in foreign

travel, went abroad, and remained eight years. Afterwards he came back,

married, and lived here for some time.

Among other traditions of the place, it is said that Ben Jonson once

walked all the way from London to visit the poet in this retreat; and a

tree is still shown on the grounds under which they are said to have

met. It seems that Ben's habits were rather too noisy and convivial to

meet altogether the taste of his fastidious and aristocratic host; and

so he had his own thoughts of him, which, being written down in a diary,

were published by some indiscreet executor, after they were both dead.

We were shown an old, original edition of the poems. I must confess I

never read them. Since I have seen the material the poet and novelist

has on this ground, all I wonder at is, that there have not been a

thousand poets to one. I should have thought they would have been as

plenty as the mavis and merle, and sprouting out every where, like the

primroses and heather bells.

Our American literature is unfortunate in this respect--that our nation

never had any childhood, our day never had any dawn; so we have very

little traditionary lore to work over.

We came home about five o'clock, and had some company in the evening.

Some time to-day I had a little chat with Mrs. W. on the Quakers. She is

a cultivated and thoughtful woman, and seemed to take quite impartial

views, and did not consider her own sect as by any means the only form

of Christianity, but maintained--what every sensible person must grant,

I think--that it has had an important mission in society, even in its

peculiarities. I inferred from her conversation that the system of plain

dress, maintained with the nicety which they always use, is by no means

a saving in a pecuniary point of view. She stated that one young friend,

who had been brought up in this persuasion, gave it as her reason for

not adopting its peculiar dress, that she could not afford it; that is

to say, that for a given sum of money she could make a more creditable

appearance were she allowed the range of form, shape, and trimming,

which the ordinary style of dressing permits.

I think almost any lady, who knows the magical value of bits of

trimming, and bows of ribbon judiciously adjusted in critical locations,

of inserting, edging, and embroidery, considered as economic arts, must

acknowledge that there is some force in the young lady's opinion.

Nevertheless the Doric simplicity of a Quaker lady's dress, who is in

circumstances to choose her material, has a peculiar charm. As at

present advised, the Quaker ladies whom I have seen very judiciously

adhere to the spirit of plain attire, without troubling themselves to

maintain the exact letter. For instance, a plain straw cottage, with its

white satin ribbon, is sometimes allowed to take the place of the close

silk bonnet of Fox's day.

For my part, while I reverence the pious and unworldly spirit which

dictated the peculiar forms of the Quaker sect, I look for a higher

development of religion still, when all the beautiful artistic faculties

of the soul being wholly sanctified and offered up to God, we shall no

longer shun beauty in any of its forms, either in dress or household

adornment, as a temptation, but rather offer it up as a sacrifice to Him

who has set us the example, by making every thing beautiful in its

season.

As to art and letters, I find many of my Quaker friends sympathizing in

those judicious views which were taken by the society of Friends in

Philadelphia, when Benjamin West developed a talent for painting,

regarding such talent as an indication of the will of Him who had

bestowed it. So I find many of them taking pleasure in the poetry of

Scott, Longfellow, and Whittier, as developments of his wisdom who gives

to the human soul its different faculties and inspirations.

More delightful society than a cultivated Quaker family cannot be found:

the truthfulness, genuineness, and simplicity of character, albeit not

wanting, at proper times, a shrewd dash of worldly wisdom, are very

refreshing.

Mrs. W. and I went to the studio of Hervey, the Scotch artist. Both he

and his wife received us with great kindness. I saw there his

Covenanters celebrating the Lord's Supper--a picture which I could not

look at critically on account of the tears which kept blinding my eyes.

It represents a bleak hollow of a mountain side, where a few trembling

old men and women, a few young girls and children, with one or two young

men, are grouped together, in that moment of hushed prayerful repose

which precedes the breaking of the sacramental bread. There is something

touching always about that worn, weary look of rest and comfort with

which a sick child lies down on a mother's bosom, and like this is the

expression with which these hunted fugitives nestle themselves beneath

the shadow of their Redeemer; mothers who had seen their sons "tortured,

not accepting deliverance"--wives who had seen the blood of their

husbands poured out on their doorstone--children with no father but

God--and bereaved old men, from whom, every child had been rent--all

gathering for comfort round the cross of a suffering Lord. In such hours

they found strength to suffer, and to say to every allurement of worldly

sense and pleasure as the drowning Margaret Wilson said to the tempters

in her hour of martyrdom, "I am _Christ's child_--let me go."

Another most touching picture of Hervey's commemorates a later scene of

Scottish devotion and martyr endurance scarcely below that of the days

of the Covenant. It is called Leaving the Manse.

We in America all felt to our heart's core a sympathy with that high

endurance which led so many Scottish ministers to forsake their

churches, their salaries, the happy homes where their children were born

and their days passed, rather than violate a principle.

This picture is a monument of this struggle. There rises the manse

overgrown with its flowering vines, the image of a lovely, peaceful

home. The minister's wife, a pale, lovely creature, is just locking the

door, out of which her husband and family have passed--leaving it

forever. The husband and father is supporting on his arm an aged, feeble

mother, and the weeping children are gathering sorrowfully round him,

each bearing away some memorial of their home; one has the bird cage.

But the unequalled look of high, unshaken patience, of heroic faith, and

love which seems to spread its light over every face, is what I cannot

paint. The painter told me that the faces were _portraits_, and the

scene by no means imaginary.

But did not these sacrifices bring with them, even in their bitterness,

a joy the world knoweth not? Yes, they did. I know it full well, not

vainly did Christ say, There is no man that hath left houses or lands

for my sake and the gospel's but he shall receive manifold more _in this

life_.

Mr. Hervey kindly gave me the engraving of his Covenanters' Sacrament,

which I shall keep as a memento of him and of Scotland.

His style of painting is forcible and individual. He showed us the

studies that he has taken with his palette and brushes out on the

mountains and moors of Scotland, painting moss, and stone, and brook,

just as it is. This is the way to be a national painter.

One pleasant evening, not long before we left Edinburgh, C., S., and I

walked out for a quiet stroll. We went through the Grass Market, where

so many defenders of the Covenant have suffered, and turned into the

churchyard of the Gray Friars; a gray, old Gothic building, with

multitudes of graves around it. Here we saw the tombs of Allan Ramsay

and many other distinguished characters. The grim, uncouth sculpture on

the old graves, and the quaint epitaphs, interested me much; but I was

most moved by coming quite unexpectedly on an ivy-grown slab, in the

wall, commemorating the martyrs of the Covenant. The inscription struck

me so much, that I got C---- to copy it in his memorandum book.

"Halt, passenger! take heed what you do see.

Here lies interred the dust of those who stood

'Gainst perjury, resisting unto blood,

Adhering to the Covenant, and laws

Establishing the same; which was the cause

Their lives were sacrificed unto the last

Of prelatists abjured, though here their dust

Lies mixed with murderers and other crew

Whom justice justly did to death pursue;

But as for them, no cause was to be found

Worthy of death, but only they were found

Constant and steadfast, witnessing

For the prerogatives of Christ their King;

Which truths were sealed, by famous Guthrie's head,

And all along to Mr. Renwick's blood

They did endure the wrath of enemies,

Reproaches, torments, deaths, and injuries;

But yet they're those who from such troubles came

And triumph now in glory with the Lamb.

"From May 27, 1681, when the Marquis of Argyle was beheaded, to

February 17, 1688, when James Renwick suffered, there were some

eighteen thousand one way or other murdered, of whom were executed

at Edinburgh about one hundred noblemen, ministers, and gentlemen,

and others, noble martyrs for Christ."

Despite the roughness of the verse, there is a thrilling power in these

lines. People in gilded houses, on silken couches, at ease among books,

and friends, and literary pastimes, may sneer at the Covenanters; it is

much easier to sneer than to die for truth and right, as they died.

Whether they were right in all respects is nothing to the purpose; but

it is to the purpose that in a crisis of their country's history they

upheld a great principle vital to her existence. Had not these men held

up the heart of Scotland, and kept alive the fire of liberty on her

altars, the very literature which has been used to defame them could not

have had its existence. The very literary celebrity of Scotland has

grown out of their grave; for a vigorous and original literature is

impossible, except to a strong, free, self-respecting people. The

literature of a people must spring from the sense of its nationality;

and nationality is impossible without self-respect, and self-respect is

impossible without liberty.

It is one of the trials of our mortal state, one of the disciplines of

our virtue, that the world's benefactors and reformers are so often

without form or comeliness. The very force necessary to sustain the

conflict makes them appear unlovely; they "tread the wine press alone,

and of the people there is none with them." The shrieks, and groans, and

agonies of men wrestling in mortal combat are often not graceful or

gracious; but the comments that the children of the Puritans, and the

children of the Covenanters, make on the ungraceful and severe elements

which marked the struggles of their great fathers, are as ill-timed as

if a son, whom a mother had just borne from a burning dwelling, should

criticize the shrieks with which she sought him, and point out to

ridicule the dishevelled hair and singed garments which show how she

struggled for his life. But these are they which are "sown in weakness,

but raised in power; which are sown in dishonor, but raised in glory:"

even in this world they will have their judgment day, and their names

which went down in the dust like a gallant banner trodden in the mire,

shall rise again all glorious in the sight of nations.

The evening sky, glowing red, threw out the bold outline of the castle,

and the quaint old edifices as they seemed to look down on us silently

from their rocky heights, and the figure of Salisbury Crags marked

itself against the red sky like a couchant lion.

The time of our sojourn in Scotland had drawn towards its close. Though

feeble in health, this visit to me has been full of enjoyment; full of

lofty, but sad memories; full of sympathies and inspirations. I think

there is no nobler land, and I pray God that the old seed here sown in

blood and tears may never be rooted out of Scotland.

Sunny Memories Of Foreign Lands, Volume 1 · 第 58 / 81 题