Here Mr. Hastings confesses that the emoluments affixed to office were

not only sufficient for the purposes and ends which the nature of his

office demanded, and the support of present dignity, but that they were

sufficient to secure him, in a very few years, a comfortable retreat;

but his object in wishing to hold his office long was _to catch applause

in public life_. What an unfortunate man is he, who has so often told

us, in so many places, and through so many mouths, that, after fourteen

years' possession of an office which was to make him a comfortable

fortune in a few years, he is at length bankrupt in fortune, and for his

applause in public life is now at your Lordships' bar, and his accuser

is his country! This, my Lords, is to be unfortunate: but there are some

misfortunes that never do or ever can arrive but through crimes. He was

a deserter from the path of honor. At the turning of the two ways he

made a glorious choice,--he caught at the applause of ambition: which

though I am ready to consent is not virtue, yet surely a generous

ambition for applause for public services in life is one of the best

counterfeits of virtue, and supplies its place in some degree; and it

adds a lustre to real virtue, where it exists as the substratum of it.

Human nature, while it is made as it is, never can wholly repudiate it

for its imperfection, because there is something yet more perfect. But

what shall we say to the deserter of that cause, who, having glory and

honor before him, has chosen to plunge himself into the downward road to

sordid riches?

My Lords, I have shown the grievances that existed. I have shown the

means that existed to put Mr. Hastings beyond a temptation to those

practices of which we accuse him, even in his own opinion,--if he will

not follow his example in the House of Commons, and disavow this letter,

as he has done his defence before them, and say he never wrote it. That

situation which was to afford him a comfortable fortune in a few years

he has held for many years, and therefore he has not one excuse to make

for himself; but I shall show your Lordships much greater and stronger

proofs, that will lean heavy upon him in the day of your sentence. The

first, the peculiar, trust that was put in him, was to redress all those

grievances.

My Lords, I have stated to you the condition of India in 1765. You may

suppose that the means that were taken, the regulations that were made

by the Company at that period of time, had operated their effect, and

that by the beginning of the year 1772, when Mr. Hastings came first to

his government, these evils did not then require, perhaps, so vigorous

an example, or so much diligence in putting an end to them; but, my

Lords, I have to show you a very melancholy truth, that, notwithstanding

all these means, the Company was of opinion that all these disorders had

increased, and accordingly they say, without entering into all the

grievous circumstances of this letter, which was wrote on the 10th of

April, 1773, "We wish we could refute the observation, that almost every

attempt made by us and our administration at your Presidency for

reforming abuses has rather increased them, and added to the misery of a

country we are so anxious to protect and cherish." They say, that, "when

oppression pervades the whole country, when youths have been suffered

with impunity to exercise sovereign jurisdiction over the natives, and

to acquire rapid fortunes by monopolizing of commerce, it cannot be a

wonder to us or yourselves that Dadney merchants do not come forward to

contract with the Company, that the manufactures find their way through

foreign channels, or that our investments are at once enormously dear

and of a debased quality. It is evident, then, that the evils which have

been so destructive to us lie too deep for any partial plans to reach or

correct; it is therefore our resolution to aim at the root of those

evils, and we are happy in having reason to believe that in every just

and necessary regulation we shall meet with the approbation and support

of the legislature, who consider the public as materially interested in

the Company's prosperity."

This is to show your Lordships that Mr. Hastings was armed with great

powers to correct great abuses, and that there was reposed in him a

special trust for that purpose. And now I shall show, by the

twenty-fifth paragraph of the same letter, that they intrusted Mr.

Hastings with this very great power from some particular hope they had,

not only of his abstaining himself, which is a thing taken for granted,

but of his restraining abuses through every part of the service; and

therefore they say, "that, in order to effectuate this great end, the

first step must be to restore perfect obedience and due subordination to

your administration. Our Governor and Council must reassume and exercise

their delegated powers upon every just occasion,--punish delinquents,

cherish the meritorious, discountenance that luxury and dissipation

which, to the reproach of government, prevailed in Bengal. Our

President, Mr. Hastings, we trust, will set the example of temperance,

economy, and application; and upon this, we are sensible, much will

depend. And here we take occasion to indulge the pleasure we have in

acknowledging Mr. Hastings's services upon the coast of Coromandel, in

constructing with equal labor and ability the plan which has so much

improved our investments there; and as we are persuaded he will

persevere in the same laudable pursuit through every branch of our

affairs in Bengal, he, in return, may depend on the steady support and

favor of his employers." Here are not only laws to restrain abuse, here

are not only salaries to prevent the temptation to it, but here are

praises to animate and encourage him, here is what very few men, even

bad in other respects, have resisted,--here is a great trust put in him,

to call upon him with particular vigor and exertion to prevent all

abuses through the settlement, and particularly these abuses of

corruption. Much trust is put in his frugality, his order, his

management of his private affairs; and from thence they hope that he

would not ruin his own fortune, but improve it by honorable means, and

teach the Company's servants the same order and management, in order to

free them from temptation to rapacity in their own particular

situations. There have been known to be men, otherwise corrupt and

vicious, who, when great trust was put in them, have called forth

principles of honor latent in their minds; and men who were nursed, in a

manner, in corruption have been not only great reformers by institution,

but greater reformers by the example of their own conduct. Then I am to

show, that, soon after his coming to that government, there were means

given him instantly of realizing those hopes and expectations, by

putting into his hands several arduous and several difficult

commissions.

My Lords, in the year 1772 the Company had received alarming advices of

many disorders throughout the country: there were likewise, at the same

time, circumstances in the state of the government upon which they

thought it necessary to make new regulations. The famine which prevailed

in and devastated Bengal, and the ill use that was made of that calamity

to aggravate the distress for the advantage of individuals, produced a

great many complaints, some true, some exaggerated, but universally

spread, as I believe is in the memory of those who are not very young

among us. This obliged the Company to a very serious consideration of an

affair which dishonored and disgraced their government, not only at

home, but through all the countries in Europe, much more than perhaps

even more grievous and real oppressions that were exercised under them.

It had alarmed their feelings, it had been marked, and had called the

attention of the public upon them in an eminent manner.

Your Lordships remember the death of Jaffier Ali Khân, the first of

those subahs who introduced the English power into Bengal. He died about

four or five years before this period. He was succeeded by two of his

sons, who succeeded to one another in a very rapid succession. The first

was the person of whom we have read an account to you. He was the

natural son of the Nabob by a person called Munny Begum, who, for the

corrupt gifts the circumstances of which we have recited, had, in

prejudice of the lawful issue of the Nabob, been raised to the _musnud_;

but as bastard slips, it is said in King Richard, (an abuse of a

Scripture phrase,) do not take deep root, this bastard slip, Nujim ul

Dowlah, shortly died, and the legitimate son, Syef ul Dowlah, succeeded

him. After him another legitimate son, Mobarek ul Dowlah, succeeded in a

minority. When I say _succeeded_, I wish your Lordships to understand

that there is no regular succession in the office of subah or viceroy

of the kingdom; but, in general, succession has been considered, and

persons have been put in that place upon some principles resembling a

regular succession. That regular succession had been broken in favor of

a natural son, and the mother of that natural son did obtain the

superiority in the female part of the family for a time.

In consequence of these two circumstances, namely, the famine, and the

abuses that were supposed to arise from it, and from the circumstance of

the minority of Mobarek ul Dowlah, who now reigns or appears to

reign,--in consequence of these two circumstances, the Company gave two

sets of orders.

The first order related to Mahomed Reza Khân, who was (as your Lordships

remember I took, in the beginning of this affair, means of explaining)

lord-deputy of the province under the native government, the English

holding the dewanny,--and deputy dewan, or high-steward, under the name

of the English, and had the command of the whole revenue; and who was

accused before the Company (the channel of which accusation we now

learn) of having aggravated that famine by a monopoly for his own

benefit. The Company, upon these loose and general charges, ordered that

he should be divested of his office, that he should be brought down to

Calcutta, and there be obliged to render an account of his conduct.

The next regulation they made was concerning the effective government of

the country, which was become vacant by the removal of Mahomed Reza

Khân. The offices which he held were in effect these: he was guardian to

the Nabob by the appointment of the Company; he had the care and

management of his family; he had the care of the public justice; and he

represented that shadow of government to foreign nations which it was

the policy of the Company, at that time, to keep up. This was the person

whom Mr. Hastings was ordered to remove; in consequence of which removal

all these offices were to be supplied,--of guardian of the Nabob's

person and manager of his family, of chief magistrate, and of

representative of the fallen dignity of the native government to the

foreign nations which traded to Bengal.

To these orders was added an instruction of a very remarkable nature,

which was a third trust that was given to Mr. Hastings: that during the

Nabob's minority he should reduce the annual allowance, which was

thirty-two lacs, to sixteen; and that to prevent the abuse of this

restricted sum, and to prevent its being directed by the minister's

authority to other purposes than that for which the Company allowed it,

(that is to say, allowed him out of what was his own,) of these sixteen

lacs an account was to be regularly kept, as a check upon the person so

appointed, which account was ordered to be transmitted to Calcutta, and

to be sent to England.

Now we are to show your Lordships what Mr. Hastings's conduct was upon

all these occasions; and for this we mean to produce testimony recorded

in the Company's books, and authentic documents taken from the public

offices of that country. At the same time I do admit that there never

was a positive testimony that did not stand something in need of the

support of presumption: for, as we know that witnesses may be perjured,

and as we know that documents can be forged, we have recourse to a known

principle in the laws of all countries, that circumstances cannot lie;

and therefore, if the testimony that is given was ever so clear and

positive, yet, if it is contrary to the circumstances of the country, if

it is contrary to the circumstances of the facts to which it alludes, if

the deposition is totally adverse and alien to the characters of the

persons, then I will say, that, though the testimonies should be many,

though they should be consistent, and though they should be clear, yet

they will still leave some degree of hesitation and doubt upon every

mind timorous in the execution of justice, as every mind ought to be.

If, for instance, ten witnesses were to swear that the Chief-Justice of

England, that the Lord High-Chancellor, or the Archbishop of Canterbury,

was seen, in the robes of his function, at noonday, robbing upon the

highway, it is not the clearness, the weight, the authority of

testimonies, that could make me believe it; I should attribute it to any

cause, either corruption, mistake, error, or madness, rather than

believe that fact. Why? Because it is totally alien to the character of

the persons, the situation, the circumstances, and to all the rules of

probability. But if, on the contrary, the crime charged has a perfect

relation with the person, with his known conduct, with his known habits,

with the situation and circumstances of the place that he is in, and

with the very corrupt inherent nature of the act that he does, then much

less proof than we are able to produce will serve; and according to the

nature and strength of the presumptions arising from the inherent nature

of a vicious principle and vicious motives in the act, will be

strengthened the weakest evidence, or, if it comes to a sufficient

height, the whole burden of proof will be turned upon the party

accused. And thus we shall think ourselves bound to show your Lordships,

in every step of this proceeding, that there is an inherent presumption

of corruption in every act. We shall show the presumptions which

preceded, we shall show the presumptions which accompanied the proof;

and these, with the subsequent presumptions, will make it impossible to

disbelieve them. Such a body of proof was never given upon any such

occasion: and it is such proof as will prevail against the whole voice

of corruption, that amazing, active, diligent, spreading voice, which

has been made, by buzzing in every part of this country, sometimes to

sound like the public voice; it will put it to silence, by showing that

your Lordships have proceeded upon the strongest evidence, active and

passive.

First, Mr. Hastings received a positive order to seize upon Mahomed Reza

Khân. That order he executed with a military promptitude of obedience,

which will show your Lordships what are the services which are congenial

to his own mind, and which find in him always a ready acquiescence, a

faithful agent, and a spirited instrument in the execution. The very day

after he received the order, he sent up, privately, without

communicating with the Council, from whom he was not ordered to keep

this proceeding a secret,--he sent up, and found that great and

respectable man and respectable magistrate, who was in all those high

offices which I have stated: and if I was to compare them to

circumstances and situations in this country, I should say he had united

in himself the character of First Lord of the Treasury, the character of

Chief-Justice, the character of Lord High-Chancellor, and the character

of Archbishop of Canterbury: a man of great gravity, dignity, and

authority, and advanced in years; had once 100,000_l._ a year for the

support of his dignity, and had at that time 50,000_l._ This man,

sitting in his garden, reposing himself after the toils of his

situation, (for he was one of the most laborious men in the world,) was

suddenly arrested, and, without a moment's respite, dragged down to

Calcutta, and there by Mr. Hastings (exceeding the orders of the

Company) confined near two years under a guard of soldiers. Mr. Hastings

kept this great man for several months without even attempting the trial

upon him. How he tried him afterwards your Lordships may probably in the

course of this business inquire; and you will then judge, from the

circumstances of that trial, that, as he was not tried for his crime, so

neither was he acquitted for his innocence;--but at present I leave him

in that situation. Mr. Hastings, unknown to the Council, having executed

the orders of the Company in the last degree of rigor to this unhappy

man, keeps him in that situation, without a trial, under a guard,

separated from his country, disgraced and dishonored, and by Mr.

Hastings's express order not suffered either to make a visit or receive

a visitor.

There was another commission for Mr. Hastings contained in these orders.

The Company, because they were of opinion that justice could not be

easily obtained while the first situations of the country were filled

with this man's adherents, desired Mr. Hastings to displace them:

leaving him a very large power, and confiding in his justice, prudence,

and impartiality not to abuse a trust of such delicacy. But we shall

prove to your Lordships that Mr. Hastings thought it necessary to turn

out, from the highest to the lowest, several hundreds of people, for no

other reason than that they had been put in their employments by that

very man whom the English government had formerly placed there. If _we_

were to insist that we could not possibly try Mr. Hastings, or come at

his wickedness, until we had eradicated his influence in Bengal, and

left not one man in it who was during his government in any place or

office whatever, yet, though we should readily admit that we could not

do the whole without it, at the same time, rather than make a general

massacre of every person presumed to be under his influence, we would

leave some of his crimes unproved. He did avow and declare, that, unless

he turned all these persons out of their offices, he could never hope to

come at the truth of any charges against Mahomed Reza Khân, against whom

no specific charge had been made. Yet, upon loose and general charges,

did he seize upon this man, confine him in this manner, and every person

who derived any place or authority from him, high or low, was turned

out. Mr. Hastings had in the Company's orders something to justify him

in rigor, but he had likewise a prudential power over that rigor; and he

not only treated this man in the manner described, but every human

creature connected with him, as if they had been all guilty, without any

charge whatever against them. These are his reasons for taking this

extraordinary step.

"I pretend not to enter into the views of others. My own were these.

Mahomed Reza Khân's influence still prevailed generally throughout the

country. In the Nabob's household, and at the capital, it was scarce

affected by his present disgrace. His favor was still courted, and his

anger dreaded. Who, under such discouragements, would give information

or evidence against him? His agents and creatures filled every office of

the nizamut and dewanny. How was the truth of his conduct to be

investigated by these? It would be superfluous to add other arguments to

show the necessity of prefacing the inquiry by breaking his influence,

removing his dependants, and putting the direction of all the affairs

which had been committed to his care into the hands of the most powerful

or active of his enemies."

My Lords, if _we_ of the House of Commons were to desire and to compel

the East India Company, or to address the crown, to remove, according to

their several situations and several capacities, every creature that had

been put into office by Mr. Hastings, because we could otherwise make no

inquiry into his conduct, should we not be justified by his own example

in insisting upon the removal of every creature of the reigning power

before we could inquire into his conduct? We have not done that, though

we feel, as he felt, great disadvantages in proceeding in the inquiry

while every situation in Bengal is notoriously held by his

creatures,--always excepting the first of all, but which we could show

is nothing under such circumstances. Then what do I infer from

this,--from his obedience to the orders of the Company, carried so much

beyond necessity, and prosecuted with so much rigor,--from the inquiry

being suspended for so long a time,--from every person in office being

removed from his situation,--from all these precautions being used as

prefatory to the inquiry, when he himself says, that, after he had used

all these means, he found not the least benefit and advantage from them?

The use I mean to make of this is, to let your Lordships see the great

probability and presumption that Mr. Hastings, finding himself in the

very selfsame situation that had occurred the year before, when

Nundcomar was sold to Mahomed Reza Khân, of selling Mahomed Reza Khân to

Nundcomar, made a corrupt use of it, and that, as Mahomed Reza Khân was

not treated with severity for his crimes, so neither was he acquitted

for his innocence. The Company had given Mr. Hastings severe orders, and

very severely had he executed them. The Company gave him no orders not

to institute a present inquiry; but he, under pretence of business,

neglected that inquiry, and suffered this man to languish in prison to

the utter ruin of his fortune.

We have in part shown your Lordships what Mr. Hastings's own manner of

proceeding with regard to a public delinquent is; but at present we

leave Mahomed Reza Khân where he was. Do your Lordships think that there

is no presumption of Mr. Hastings having a corrupt view in this

business, and of his having put this great man, who was supposed to be

of immense wealth, under contributions? Mr. Hastings never trusted his

colleagues in this proceeding; and what reason does he give? Why, he

supposed that they must be bribed by Mahomed Reza Khân. "For," says he,

"as I did not know their characters at that time, I did not know whether

Mahomed Reza Khân had not secured them to his interest by the known ways

in which great men in the East secure men to their interest." He never

trusted his colleagues with the secret; and the person that he employed

to prosecute Mahomed Reza Khân was his bitter enemy, Nundcomar. I will

not go the length of saying that the circumstance of enmity disables a

person from being a prosecutor; under some circumstances it renders a

man incompetent to be a witness; but this I know, that the circumstance

of having no other person to rely upon in a charge against any man but

his enemy, and of having no other principle to go upon than what is

supposed to be derived out of that enmity, must form some considerable

suspicion against the proceeding. But in this he was justified by the

Company; for Nundcomar, the great rival of Mahomed Reza Khân, was in the

worst situation with the Company as to his credit. This Nundcomar's

politics in the country had been by Mr. Hastings himself, and by several

persons joined with him, cruelly represented to the Company; and

accordingly he stood so ill with them, by reason of Mr. Hastings's

representations and those of his predecessors, that the Company ordered

and directed, that, if he could be of any use in the inquiry into

Mahomed Reza Khân's conduct, some reward should be given him suitable to

his services; but they caution Mr. Hastings at the same time against

giving him any trust which he might employ to the disadvantage of the

Company. Now Mr. Hastings began, before he could experience any service

from him, by giving him his reward, and not the base reward of a base

service, _money_, but every trust and power which he was prohibited from

giving him. Having turned out every one of Mahomed Reza Khân's

dependants, he filled every office, as he avows, with the creatures of

Nundcomar. Now when he uses a cruel and rigorous obedience in the case

of Mahomed Reza Khân, when he breaks through the principles of his

former conduct with regard to Nundcomar, when he gives _him_, Nundcomar,

trust, whom he was cautioned not to trust, and when he gives him that

reward before any service could be done,--I say, when he does this, in

violation of the Company's orders and his own principles, it is the

strongest evidence that he now found them in the situation in which they

were in 1765, when bribes were notoriously taken, and that each party

was mutually sold to the other, and faith kept with neither. The

situation in which Mr. Hastings thus placed himself should have been

dreaded by him of all things, because he knew it was a situation in

which the most outrageous corruption had taken place before.

The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Vol. 10 (of 12) · 第 12 / 31 段