DAVID HARTLEY TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
Paris, August, 29th, 1783.
Gentlemen,
As the day is now fixed for the signatures of the definitive treaties,
between Great Britain, France, and Spain, I beg leave to inform your
Excellencies, that I am ready to sign the definitive treaty, between
Great Britain and the United States of America, whenever it shall be
convenient to you. I beg the favor, therefore, of you to fix the day.
My instructions confine me to Paris, as the place appointed to me for
the exercise of my functions, and, therefore, whatever day you may fix
upon for the signature, I shall hope to receive the honor of your
company at the _Hotel de York_.
I am, Gentlemen, with the greatest respect, yours, &c.
DAVID HARTLEY.
* * * * *
TO DAVID HARTLEY.
Passy, August 30th, 1783.
The American Ministers Plenipotentiary for making peace with Great
Britain, present their compliments to Mr Hartley. They regret that Mr
Hartley's instructions will not permit him to sign the definitive
treaty of peace with America at the place appointed for the signature
of the others. They will, nevertheless, have the honor of waiting upon
Mr Hartley at his lodgings at Paris, for the purpose of signing the
treaty in question, on Wednesday morning at eight o'clock.
* * * * *
DAVID HARTLEY TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
Paris, September 4th, 1783.
Gentlemen,
It is with the sincerest pleasure that I congratulate you on the happy
event which took place yesterday, viz.; the signature of the
definitive treaty between our two countries. I considered it as the
auspicious presage of returning confidence, and of the future
intercourse of all good offices between us. I doubt not that our two
countries will entertain the same sentiments, and that they will
behold with satisfaction the period which terminates the memory of
their late unhappy dissensions, and which leads to the renewal of all
the ancient ties of amity and peace. I can assure you, that his
Britannic Majesty and his confidential servants entertain the
strongest desire of a cordial good understanding with the United
States of America. And that nothing may be wanting on our parts to
perfect the great work of pacification, I shall propose to you in a
very short time, to renew the discussion of those points of amity and
intercourse which have been lately suspended, to make way for the
signature of the treaties between all the late belligerent powers,
which took place yesterday.
We have now the fairest prospects before us, and an unembarrassed
field for the exercise of every beneficent disposition, and for the
accomplishment of every object of reciprocal advantage between us. Let
us, then, join our hearts and hands together in one common cause for
the reunion of all our ancient affections and common interests.[16]
I am, Gentlemen, &c.
DAVID HARTLEY.
FOOTNOTE:
[16] As the definitive treaty was an exact copy of the Provisional
Articles (see above, p. 109) it is here omitted.
* * * * *
B. FRANKLIN TO CHARLES FOX.
Passy, September 5th, 1783.
Sir,
I received in its time the letter you did me the honor of writing to
me by Mr Hartley; and I cannot let him depart without expressing my
satisfaction in his conduct towards us, and applauding the prudence of
that choice, which sent us a man possessed of such a spirit of
conciliation, and of all that frankness, sincerity, and candor, which
naturally produce confidence, and thereby facilitate the most
difficult negotiations. Our countries are now happily at peace, on
which I congratulate you most cordially; and I beg you to be assured,
that as long as I have any concern in public affairs, I shall readily
and heartily concur with you in promoting every measure that may tend
to promote the common felicity.
With great and sincere esteem and respect, I have the honor to be, &c.
B. FRANKLIN.
* * * * *
TO DAVID HARTLEY.
Passy, September 5th, 1783.
Sir,
We have received the letter you did us the honor to write yesterday.
Your friendly congratulations on the signature of the definitive
treaty meet with cordial returns on our part; and we sincerely rejoice
with you on that event, by which the Ruler of nations has been
graciously pleased to give peace to our two countries.
We are no less ready to join our endeavors than our wishes with yours,
to concert such measures for regulating the future intercourse between
Great Britain and the United States, as, by being consistent with the
honor and interests of both, may tend to increase and perpetuate
mutual confidence and good will.
We ought, nevertheless, to apprize you, that as no construction of our
commission could at any period extend it, unless by implication, to
several of the proposed stipulations; and as our instructions
respecting commercial provisions, however explicit, suppose their
being incorporated in the definitive treaty, a recurrence to Congress
previous to the signature of them will be necessary, unless obviated
by the despatches we may sooner receive from them.
We shall immediately write to them on the subject, and we are
persuaded that the same disposition to confidence and friendship,
which has induced them already to give unrestrained course to British
commerce and unconditionally to liberate all prisoners at a time when
more caution would not have appeared singular, will also urge their
attention to the objects in question, and lead them to every proper
measure for promoting a liberal and satisfactory intercourse between
the two countries.
We have communicated to Congress the repeated friendly assurances with
which you have officially honored us on these subjects, and we are
persuaded that the period of their being realized will have an
auspicious and conciliating influence on all the parties in the late
unhappy dissensions.
We have the honor to be, &c.
JOHN ADAMS,
B. FRANKLIN,
JOHN JAY.
* * * * *
TO DAVID HARTLEY.
Passy, September 7th, 1783.
Sir,
We have the honor of transmitting, herewith enclosed an extract of a
resolution of Congress of the 1st of May last, which we have just
received.
You will perceive from it, that we may daily expect a commission in
due form, for the purposes mentioned in it; and we assure you of our
readiness to enter upon the business whenever you may think
proper.[17]
We have the honor to be, &c.
JOHN ADAMS,
B. FRANKLIN,
JOHN JAY.
FOOTNOTE:
[17] _In Congress, May 1st, 1783._ On the report of a committee to
whom was referred a letter of February 5th, from the honorable John
Adams,
"Ordered, That a commission be prepared to Messrs John Adams, Benjamin
Franklin and John Jay, authorising them, or either of them in the
absence of the others, to enter into a treaty of commerce between the
United States of America and Great Britain, subject to the revisal of
the contracting parties, previous to its final conclusion, and in the
meantime to enter into a commercial convention, to continue in force
one year.
"That the Secretary of Foreign Affairs lay before Congress, without
delay, a plan of a treaty of commerce, and instructions relative to
the same, to be transmitted to the said commissioners."
* * * * *
TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.
Passy, September 10th, 1783.
Sir,
On the 3d instant definitive treaties of peace were concluded between
all the late belligerent powers, except the Dutch, who the day before
settled and signed preliminary articles of peace with Britain.
We most sincerely and cordially congratulate Congress and our country
in general on this happy event; and we hope, that the same kind
providence, which has led us through a rigorous war to an honorable
peace, will enable us to make a wise and moderate use of that
inestimable blessing.
We have communicated a duplicate original of the treaty to the care of
Mr Thaxter, who will go immediately to L'Orient, whence he will sail
in the French packet to New York. That gentleman left America with Mr
Adams as his private Secretary, and his conduct having been perfectly
satisfactory to that Minister, we join in recommending him to the
attention of Congress. We have ordered Mr Grand to pay him one hundred
and thirty louis d'ors, on account of the reasonable expenses to be
incurred by his mission to Congress, and his journey from thence to
his family at Hingham, in the Massachusetts Bay. For the disposition
of the money he is to account. The definitive treaty being in the
terms of the Provisional Articles, and not comprehending any of the
objects of our subsequent negotiations, it is proper that we give a
summary account of them.
When Mr Hartley arrived here, he brought with him only a set of
instructions, signed by the King. We objected to proceeding with him
until he should have a commission in form. This occasioned some delay.
A proper commission was, however, transmitted to him, a copy of which
was shortly after sent to Mr Livingston.
We having been instructed to obtain, if possible, an Article for a
direct trade to the West Indies, made to Mr Hartley the proposition
No. 1.[18]
He approved of it greatly, and recommended it to his Court, but they
declined assenting to it.
Mr Hartley then made us the proposition No. 2;[19] but being asked,
whether he was authorised to sign it, in case we agreed to it, he
answered in the negative. We, therefore, thought it improper to
proceed to the consideration of it, until after he should have
obtained the consent of his Court to it. We also desired to be
informed, whether his Court would, or would not, comprehend Ireland in
their stipulations with us.
The British Cabinet would not adopt Mr Hartley's propositions, but
their letters to him were calculated to inspire us with expectations,
that as nothing but particular local circumstances, which would
probably not be of long duration, restrained them from preferring the
most liberal system of commerce with us, the Ministry would take the
earliest opportunity of gratifying their own wishes, as well as ours,
on that subject.
Mr Hartley then made us the propositions No. 3.[20] At this time, we
were informed, that letters for us had arrived in France from
Philadelphia; we expected to receive instructions in them, and told Mr
Hartley, that this expectation induced us to postpone giving him an
answer for a few days.
The vessel by which we expected these letters, it seems had not
brought any for us. But at that time information arrived from America,
that our ports were all opened to British vessels. Mr Hartley
thereupon did not think himself at liberty to proceed, until after he
should communicate that intelligence to his Court and receive their
further instructions.
Those further instructions never came; and thus our endeavors as to
commercial regulations proved fruitless. We had many conferences, and
received long Memorials from Mr Hartley on the subject; but his zeal
for systems friendly to us, constantly exceeded his authority to
concert and agree to them.
During the long interval of his expecting instructions, for his
expectations were permitted to exist almost to the last, we proceeded
to make and receive propositions for perfecting the definitive treaty.
Details of all the amendments, alterations, objections, expectations,
&c. which occurred in the course of these discussions, would be
voluminous. We finally agreed that he should send to his Court the
project or draft of a treaty, No. 4.[21] He did so, but after much
time, and when pressed by France, who insisted that we should all
conclude together, he was instructed to sign a definitive treaty in
the terms of the Provisional Articles.
Whether the British Court meant to avoid a definitive treaty with us,
through a vain hope, from the exaggerated accounts of divisions among
our people, and want of authority in Congress, that some revolution
might soon happen in their favor; or whether their dilatory conduct
was caused by the strife of the two opposite and nearly equal parties
in the Cabinet, is hard to decide.
Your Excellency will observe, that the treaty was signed at Paris, and
not at Versailles. Mr Hartley's letter of August 29th, and our answer,
will explain this. His objections, and indeed our proceedings in
general, were communicated to the French Minister, who was content
that we should acquiesce, but desired that we would appoint the
signing early in the morning, and give him an account of it at
Versailles by express, for that he would not proceed to sign on the
part of France, till he was sure that our business was done.
The day after the signature of the treaty, Mr Hartley wrote us a
congratulatory letter, to which we replied.
He has gone to England, and expects soon to return, which for our
parts we think uncertain. We have taken care to speak to him in strong
terms, on the subject of the evacuation of New York, and the other
important subjects proper to be mentioned to him. We think we may rely
on his doing everything in his power to influence his Court to do what
they ought to do; but it does not appear, that they have as yet
formed any settled system for their conduct relative to the United
States. We cannot but think, that the late and present aspect of
affairs in America, has had and continues to have, an unfavorable
influence, not only in Britain but throughout Europe.
In whatever light the Article respecting the tories may be viewed in
America, it is considered in Europe as very humiliating to Britain,
and therefore as being one, which we ought in honor to perform and
fulfil with the most scrupulous regard to good faith, and in a manner
least offensive to the feelings of the King and Court of Great
Britain, who upon that point are extremely tender.
The unseasonable and unnecessary resolves of various towns on this
subject, the actual expulsion of tories from some places, and the
avowed implacability of almost all who have published their sentiments
about the matter, are circumstances, which are construed, not only to
the prejudice of our national magnanimity and good faith, but also to
the prejudice of our governments.
Popular committees are considered here, as with us, in the light of
substitutes to constitutional government, and as being only necessary
in the interval between the removal of the former and the
establishment of the present.
The constitutions of the different States have been translated and
published, and pains have been taken to lead Europe to believe, that
the American States, not only made their own laws, but obeyed them.
But the continuance of popular assemblies, convened expressly to
deliberate on matters proper only for the cognizance of the different
legislatures and officers of government, and their proceeding not only
to ordain, but to enforce their resolutions, has exceedingly lessened
the dignity of the States in the eyes of these nations.
To this we may also add, that the situation of the army, the
reluctance of the people to pay taxes, and the circumstances under
which Congress removed from Philadelphia, have diminished the
admiration, in which the people of America were held among the nations
of Europe, and somewhat abated their ardor for forming connexions with
us, before our affairs acquire a greater degree of order and
consistence.
Permit us to observe, that in our opinion, the recommendation of
Congress, promised in the fifth Article, should immediately be made in
the terms of it, and published, and that the States should be
requested to take it into consideration, as soon as the evacuation by
the enemy shall be completed. It is also much to be wished, that the
legislatures may not involve all the tories in banishment and ruin,
but that such discrimination may be made, as to entitle the decisions
to the approbation of disinterested men and dispassionate posterity.
On the 7th instant we received your Excellency's letter of the 16th of
June last, covering a resolution of Congress of the 1st of May,
directing a commission to us for making a treaty of commerce, &c. with
Great Britain. This intelligence arrived very opportunely to prevent
the anti-American party in England from ascribing any delays, on our
part, to motives of resentment to that country. Great Britain will
send a Minister to Congress, as soon as Congress shall send a Minister
to Britain, and we think much good might result from that measure.
The information of M. Dumas, that we encouraged the idea of entering
into engagements with the Dutch, to defend the freedom of trade, was
not well founded. Our sentiments on that subject exactly correspond
with those of Congress; nor did we even think or pretend, that we had
authority to adopt any such measures.
We have reason to think that the Emperor, and Russia, and other
commercial nations, are ready to make treaties of commerce with the
United States. Perhaps it might not be improper for Congress to
direct, that their disposition on the subject be communicated to those
Courts, and thereby prepare the way for such treaties.
The Emperor of Morocco has manifested a very friendly disposition
towards us. He expects, and is ready to receive a Minister from us;
and as he may either change his mind, or may be succeeded by a prince
differently disposed, a treaty with him may be of importance. Our
trade to the Mediterranean will not be inconsiderable, and the
friendship of Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli may become very
interesting, in case the Russians should succeed in their endeavors to
navigate freely into it by Constantinople.
Much, we think, will depend on the success of our negotiations with
England. If she should be prevailed upon to agree to a liberal system
of commerce, France, and perhaps some other nations, will follow her
example; but if she should prefer an exclusive, monopolizing plan, it
is probable that her neighbors will continue to adhere to their
favorite restrictions.
Were it certain that the United States could be brought to act as a
nation, and would jointly and fairly conduct their commerce on
principles of exact reciprocity with all nations, we think it probable
that Britain would make extensive concessions. But, on the contrary,
while the prospect of disunion in our councils, or want of power and
energy in our executive departments exist, they will not be
apprehensive of retaliation, and consequently lose their principal
motive to liberty. Unless, with respect to all foreign nations and
transactions, we uniformly act as an entire united nation, faithfully
executing and obeying the constitutional acts of Congress on those
subjects, we shall soon find ourselves in the situation in which all
Europe wishes to see us, viz. as unimportant consumers of her
manufactures and productions, and as useful laborers to furnish her
with raw materials.
We beg leave to assure Congress that we shall apply our best endeavors
to execute this new commission to their satisfaction, and shall
punctually obey such instructions as they may be pleased to give us
relative to it. Unless Congress have nominated a Secretary to that
commission, we shall consider ourselves at liberty to appoint one; and
as we are satisfied with the conduct of Mr Franklin, the Secretary to
our late commission, we propose to appoint him, leaving it to Congress
to make such compensation for his services as they may judge proper.
Count de Vergennes communicated to us a proposition, viz. herewith
enclosed,[22] for explaining the 2d and 3d Articles of our treaty with
France in a manner different from the sense in which we understand
them. This being a matter in which we have no right to interfere, we
have not expressed any opinion about it to the Court.
With great respect, we have the honor to be, Sir, your Excellency's
most obedient and most humble servants,
JOHN ADAMS,
B. FRANKLIN,
JOHN JAY.
FOOTNOTES:
[18] See Mr Adams's proposed agreement, above, p. 151.
[19] See Mr Hartley's proposed agreement, p. 154.
[20] Above, p. 182.
[21] See above, p. 195.
[22] See above, p. 146.
* * * * *
FROM CONGRESS TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
October 29th, 1783.
By the United States in Congress assembled.
To the Commissioners of the United States of America at the Court
of Versailles, empowered to negotiate a peace, or to any one or
more of them;
1st. You are instructed and authorised to announce to his Imperial
Majesty the Emperor of Germany, or to his Ministers, the high sense
which the United States in Congress assembled entertain of his exalted
character and eminent virtues, and their earnest desire to cultivate
his friendship, and to enter into a treaty of amity and commerce for
the mutual advantage of the subjects of his Imperial Majesty, and the
citizens of these United States.
2dly. You are instructed to meet the advances and encourage the
disposition of the other commercial powers in Europe for entering into
treaties of amity and commerce with these United States. In
negotiations on this subject, you will lay it down as a principle in
no case to be deviated from, that they shall respectively have for
their basis the mutual advantage of the contracting parties on terms
of the most perfect equality and reciprocity, and not to be repugnant
to any of the treaties already entered into by the United States with
France and other foreign powers. That such treaties shall, in the
first instance, be proposed for a term not exceeding fifteen years,
and shall not be finally conclusive until they shall respectively have
been transmitted to the United States in Congress assembled, for their
examination and final direction; and that, with the drafts or
propositions for such treaties, shall be transmitted all the
information which shall come within the knowledge of the said
Ministers respecting the same; and their observations after the most
mature inquiry on the probable advantages or disadvantages and effects
of such treaties respectively.
3dly. You are instructed to continue to press upon the Ministers of
his Danish Majesty the justice of causing satisfaction to be made for
the value of the ships and goods captured by the Alliance frigate and
sent into Bergen, and how essentially it concerns the honor of the
United States that their gallant citizens should not be deprived of
any part of those prizes, which they had so justly acquired by their
valor. That as far as Congress have been informed, the estimate of
those prizes at fifty thousand pounds sterling is not immoderate; that
no more however is desired than their true value, after every
deduction which shall be thought equitable. That Congress have a
sincere disposition to cultivate the friendship of his Danish Majesty,
and to promote a commercial intercourse between his subjects and the
citizens of the United States, on terms which shall promise mutual
advantage to both nations. That it is therefore the wish of Congress,
that this claim should still be referred to the equitable disposition
of his Danish Majesty, in full confidence that the reasonable
expectations of the parties interested will be fully answered;
accordingly you are fully authorised and directed, after exerting your
best endeavors to enforce the said claim to the extent it shall appear
to you to be well founded, to make abatements if necessary, and
ultimately to accept such compensation as his Danish Majesty can be
prevailed upon to grant.
4thly. You are further instructed, to inquire and report to Congress
the reasons why the expedition of the Alliance and Bon Homme Richard,
and the squadron which accompanied them, was carried on at the expense
and on account of the Court of France; whether any part of the profit
arising therefrom accrued to the United States; or any of the expense
thereof has been placed to their account; whether the proceeds of any
of the prizes taken in that expedition, and which is due to the
American officers and seamen employed therein, is deposited in Europe;
and what amount, where, and in whose hands.