If we can agree upon an article of intercourse and commerce, in the

nature of a temporary convention, on the basis of the Memorial, which

I had the honor of giving lately to you, bearing date 19th of May,

1783, no time need be lost in finishing this business; but with this

explanation, that although it is proposed, that the commerce between

the United States and the British West Indies should be free with

regard to their respective productions, yet, that we are not bound to

admit the importation of West India commodities into Great Britain in

American vessels. Believe me, Gentlemen, that this restriction does

not proceed from any invidious disposition towards the American

States. It is imposed by indispensable prudence and necessity upon the

British Ministers, who, in the present state of things, could not be

justified to their own country, to go hastily to a larger extent of

concession. This point is not to be looked upon merely as commercial,

but as affecting fundamentally the great political system of British

navigation; and you are to consider, that the principle, upon which

the whole of our proposed temporary convention is to stand, is, that

the _commerce_ between the two countries is to be revived nearly upon

the old footing; but that each nation is to keep in its own hands, the

power of making such regulations respecting _navigation_, as shall

seem fit. I assure you, that this point has been discussed by the

Ministers of the British cabinet with infinite candor, and with every

possible disposition of amity and favor towards your country; but the

more they have inquired upon this subject, the more they are overborne

by conviction, that the prejudices upon this matter (if that be the

name these opinions deserve) are so strong, that such a measure as a

relaxation of the act of navigation, in this instance, never can be

taken, but upon such a full and solemn Parliamentary inquiry, as it is

impossible to go into at this time of the year, and in this stage of

the session. I cannot, therefore, Gentlemen, help flattering myself,

that you, who are so well acquainted with difficulties, which must

embarrass an English administration in a business of this sort, will

rather endeavor to remove them, than to increase them; and I am sure,

that such a plan, on your part, would ultimately be most conducive to

your own objects. When an amicable intercourse is once opened, and

when conciliatory confidence comes to take place of those jealousies,

which have lately subsisted, you may easily conceive in how different

a manner the whole of this matter will be considered. I am confident

that this will be the case, but if it is not, the provisions being

only temporary, it will be in the power of the United States, to take

up any hostile mode of proceeding, by restraints and prohibitions, &c.

whenever they may think fit.

I have made use above of the word _prejudices_ in speaking of the

principles of the British act of navigation. I hope you will accept

that term from me, as proceeding so far in compliance towards the

future consideration of the points now between us, as to keep the

question open and free for discussion. If Great Britain should, in any

case, throw down the barriers of her act of navigation towards

America, she should be very secure against the possible case of future

enmity, or alliance against her. Such considerations as these, lead to

objects far beyond our present scope or powers. But I must still add

one word more upon this article of _prejudices_. Such prejudices (if

they are so) are not confined to Great Britain. By your commercial

treaty with France, Article 4th, you are only entitled to an European

trade with that kingdom, and not, even by that treaty, to any direct

commerce between their West India Islands and the ports of the

American States; much less to the immediate communication between the

French Islands and the dominions of the Crown of France in Europe.

Every public proceeding in England, since the commencement of our

present negotiation for opening the intercourse and commerce between

our two countries, will, I am sure, support me in saying, that we have

very liberally taken the lead; that we have not waited for any

assurance of reciprocity, but have given orders for almost a universal

admission of American articles, before we even know that any vessel

from Great Britain will find admission into any American ports. What

do we ask in return? No more than this; that while we gratuitously,

and without stipulation, give advantages and favors to the American

States, which we deny to all other nations, they would so far justify

our liberal way of proceeding, as to receive us in the same manner as

other nations, which are foreign, and to permit us to carry to North

America, what it is evidently for their interest that we should carry

thither.

I need hardly add, that it is of infinite importance, that some

temporary convention should be finished without loss of time. I hope

and trust that we shall not find much more difficulty in this

business. You must see the advantage of an immediate renewal of

intercourse, and from the candor of your dispositions, I am sure you

must likewise be convinced, that to give us some facility in the

outset, is the sure road to such an equitable arrangement for the

future, as you must have at heart. The reasons, which I have given in

the Memorial appear to me to be cogent and convincing, upon the

natural alliance between our two countries. And when the intercourse

has once begun, everything will go in its natural road. It is,

therefore, of infinite consequence to begin that intercourse. Great

Britain, by all public proceedings of repeals, proclamations, &c. &c.

has made the first advances, with warmth and confidence, and,

therefore, I conclude, with the fullest assurance, that you will meet

those advances with cordial reciprocity.

I have the honor to be, &c.

D. HARTLEY.

* * * * *

DAVID HARTLEY'S MEMORIAL TO THE COMMISSIONERS.

The proposition, which has been made for a universal and unlimited

reciprocity of intercourse and commerce, between Great Britain and the

American United States, requires a very serious consideration on the

part of Great Britain, for the reasons already stated in a Memorial,

dated May 19th, 1783, and for many other reasons, which in the future

discussion of the proposition will appear. To the American States,

likewise, it is a matter of the deepest importance, not only as a

proposition of commercial intercourse, which is the least part, but

most principally, as a political basis and guarantee for their newly

established constitutions. The introduction of British interests into

a communion of intercourse, will bring forward a universal guarantee

on the part of Great Britain, in the future progress of political

events, which may affect the United States of America in their

national capacity. The proposition is fertile in future prospects to

Great Britain; and America also may wisely see in it a solid

foundation for herself.

All circumstances are most fortunately disposed between Great Britain

and the American States, to render them useful friends and allies to

each other, with a higher degree of suitableness between themselves

than any other nations can pretend to. France cannot interchange

reciprocities with the American States, by reason of numberless

impediments in her system of government, in her monopolies, and her

system of commerce. France has the great disability of difference in

language to contend with; and the institution of the present French

manufactures has never, at any time heretofore, been trained or

adapted to American commerce. The only particular and pacific facility

which France ever possessed for American intercourse, has for many

years been transferred into the British scale by the cession of Canada

to Great Britain. The future commerce, between France and America,

will chiefly be regulated by such conveniences as France can draw to

herself from America, without much aptitude on the part of France, to

accommodate her manufactures and commerce to American demands. In

short, an interchange of reciprocities between France and America,

would run against the stream on both sides; and all established

habits, manners, language, together with the principles of government

and commerce, would militate against such a system.

Conformably to this reasoning, it appears, that France has not at any

time entertained any systematical design of forming any union or

consolidation of interests with America. She took up the American

cause, as instrumental to her political views in Europe. America

likewise accepted the alliance with France, for her separate views,

viz. for the establishment of her independence. The alliance,

therefore, is completed and terminated, without leaving behind it any

political principle of future permanent connexion between them.

Occasional circumstances produced a temporary alliance. Similar

circumstances may, on any future occasion, produce a similar event of

a temporary compact. Dissimilar circumstances, arising from any future

political views of the Court of France in Europe, may without any

inconsistency of principle, throw the power of that kingdom into a

scale adverse to the future interests of the American States. In such

case, therefore, where there cannot exist any permanent political

connexion between France and America, and where the commercial

attachments can be but feeble, it would be vain to expect in the

French nation any such ally, as newly established States ought to look

out for, to give maturity and firmness to their constitutions.

As to Spain, every argument which has been stated respecting diversity

of language, manners, government, monopolies, and system of commerce,

from those which prevail in the United States of America, obtains in a

superior degree. And much more to add besides, for Spain is not only

incompetent to interchange reciprocities with the American States, but

likewise her own situation in America will at all times render her

extremely jealous of her neighbors. The only activity which Spain has

exerted in the war, has been to procure a barrier against the American

States, by annexing West Florida to her former acquisition of New

Orleans; thereby embracing the mouth of the Mississippi, and by means

of that river, jointly with her landed possessions, establishing a

strong and jealous boundary against any future progress of the

American States in those parts. Spain, therefore, cannot be looked

upon by the American States as a suitable object of their election, to

become a permanent ally and friend to them. Portugal, likewise, labors

under all the disabilities of language, manners, monopolies,

government and system of commerce. Her national power and importance

would be likewise insufficient to constitute a strong and permanent

ally to the American States. All these nations will undoubtedly be

found to have many commodious qualities for participation in commerce;

but the permanent facilities necessary to constitute a firm and

permanent ally to the American States, will be found deficient in

them.

As to the Italian States, or any other powers in the Mediterranean,

they are certainly not adequate to any competition of political

alliance with the rising States of America. They will also form very

commodious links and connexions in the general circuit of commerce;

but beyond these considerations, they have no share in the present

question. The several States in the Germanic body are in the same

predicament.

As to the Northern powers, viz. those in the Baltic, they are not

favored either by vicinity, or climate, for a frequent or facile

intercourse of commerce with America. And even respecting several

material articles of commerce, jealousies and competitions might

arise. As to political alliances, there are no such in prospect from

them to the American States. Even if there were any superfluity of

force in any of them beyond the necessities of their respective

domestic situations, the extreme distance would be conclusive against

any possible application of such power, as a political alliance

favorable to the establishment and conformation of the American

States.

The only maritime state on the continent of Europe remaining to be

discussed, as a competent candidate for commerce, or connexion with

America, is the Republic of the United Netherlands, commonly called

Holland. In respect to American commerce, the Dutch have among

themselves every facility combined, which the separate States of

Europe, possess distinctly in their own concerns, or nearly. Their

industry, frugality, and habits of commerce, may even carry them so

far, as to make them rivals to the Americans themselves, in the

transportation of European merchandise to America. These faculties of

commerce would have been of infinite importance to the American

States, if the war had continued between Great Britain and them. But

upon the event of peace, it becomes a matter of the most perfect

indifference to America, whether each European State navigates its own

commerce into the ports of America, which will open to all, or whether

the commercial faculties of Holland enable her to exceed in rivalship

her European neighbors, and thereby to navigate European goods to

America beyond the proportion of her national share. The faculties of

a nation of carriers may be fortunate for the marine of that nation;

but considered in themselves, and with respect to other nations, they

are but secondaries in commerce. They give no ground of reciprocities,

or participation. That one nation should say to another, you shall

navigate all our rivers, harbors, lakes, ports, and places, if we may

do the same in yours, is a proposition of reciprocity; but that

Holland should say to America, we will bring European goods to you, or

you may be your own carriers, is neither concession nor reciprocity.

Holland is not a nation of rivers, harbors, lakes, ports, and places,

for the distribution of goods and manufactures for internal

consumption, and, therefore, her reciprocities must be very scanty.

Holland is the market-place of Europe, and the Dutch seamen are the

carriers appertaining to that market-place. The admission of American

ships to that market-place, freely to import and to export, is,

undoubtedly, an act of reciprocity on the part of Holland as far as it

goes, but in no degree adequate to the unlimited participation of

American commerce throughout the rivers, harbors, lakes, ports, and

places of that vast continent. The commercial reciprocities of

Holland, therefore, being inferior, on her part, towards America, the

next point of view in which Holland is to be considered, as relevant

to this question, is, as a nation of power, capable of becoming an

effectual and permanent ally and guarantee to the American States, for

that is the great object, which America, as a wise nation, recently

arisen into independence, ought to keep in view. Holland has certainly

been a nation of great and celebrated naval force. She remains so

still; but having for many years suspended her exertions of force, and

having directed the faculties of her people into the commercial line,

she seems not to have any superfluity of force beyond the necessity of

providing for her own security; and, certainly, no such redundance of

power, as to extend to the protection of distant nations, as allies or

guarantees. It appears, therefore, upon the whole of this argument,

that Holland, although a commercial nation, cannot even interchange

commercial reciprocities with America upon an equal footing, and that

her faculties of force are inadequate to those, which America ought to

expect in the permanent allies and guarantees of her country.

The independence of the American States being established, their first

consideration ought to be, to determine with what friendships and

alliances they will enter into the new world of nations. They will

look round them, and cast about for some natural, permanent, and

powerful ally, with whom they may interchange all cementing

reciprocities, both commercial and political. If such an ally be to be

found anywhere for them, it is still in Great Britain; at least, it

is certain, that, in looking round Europe, no other is to be found.

There is no inherent impossibility to prevent such a connexion from

taking place; it must depend on the free will and common interest of

the parties. There are all possible faculties on both sides, to give

and to receive all adequate and beneficial reciprocities, which are

practicable and more likely to be permanent between independent

parties, than between two parties, of which one is dependent on the

other. Great Britain is, undoubtedly, the first of European nations,

in riches, credit, faculties, industry, commerce, manufactures,

internal consumption, and foreign export, together with civil liberty,

which is the source of all, and naval power, which is the support of

all. The dominions appertaining to the Crown of Great Britain are

large and fertile; its Colonies still extensive, and in close vicinity

to the American States, Great Britain being an American, as well as an

European power, and all her empire connected by her naval force.

The territories of the American States, from the Atlantic ocean to the

Mississippi, contain an inexhaustible source of riches, industry, and

future power. These will be the foundations of great events in the new

page of life. Infinite good, or infinite evil, may arise according to

the principles upon which the intercourse between Great Britain and

America shall be arranged in its foundation. Great Britain and America

must be still inseparable, either as friends or foes. This is an awful

and important truth. These are considerations not to be thought of

slightly; not to be prejudged in passion, nor the arrangements of them

to be hastily foreclosed. Time given for consideration may have

excellent effects on both sides. The pause of peace, with friendly

intercourse, returning affection, and dispassionate inquiry, can

alone decide these important events, or do justice to the anxious

expectations of Great Britain and America.

* * * * *

THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS TO THE COMMISSIONERS.

Philadelphia, June 16th, 1783.

Gentlemen,

I am sorry to inform you, that by the resignation of Mr Livingston as

Minister for Foreign Affairs, it has become necessary that you should

receive the resolutions of Congress, relative to your mission through

my hands. The disadvantage arising from this necessity, until a

successor to that worthy gentleman is appointed, will be yours, as it

is impossible for me to do more than barely to transmit the acts of

Congress necessary for your information.

Enclosed you have one of the 1st of May last, and another of the 12th

instant, which I hope will get safe to hand time enough for your

government. The commission and instructions referred to in the first,

not being ready, it was thought best to forward the resolution without

delay, that you might know what was intended in the present important

period of your negotiation. We have been much surprised, that we have

not received any communications from you since the cessation of

hostilities, except a letter of the 5th of April, from Mr Laurens.

I have the honor to be, &c.

ELIAS BOUDINOT, _President_.

* * * * *

HENRY LAURENS TO THE COMMISSIONERS.

London, June 17th, 1783.

Gentlemen,

I had the honor of addressing you on the 10th, immediately after my

landing at Dover. As early as possible after my arrival here, I

obtained an interview with Mr Secretary Fox, who was pleased to read

to me part of his latest despatches to Mr Hartley, which he supposed

would reach Paris on the 14th. It is probable, therefore, that before

this time, as much of the contents as is proper for your knowledge has

been communicated.

"Reciprocity," since the 10th of April, has undergone a certain degree

of refinement. The definition of that term appears now to be

possession of advantages on one side, and restrictions on the other.

"The navigation act is the vital of Great Britain, too delicate to

bear a touch." The sudden and unexpected, perhaps illicit, arrival of

ships and cargoes from America, may have caused this change of tone.

But you have heard in detail, and are more competent to judge.

From a desire of forming an opinion, I asked Mr Fox, whether he

thought I might venture for a few days, to take the benefit of Bath,

and yet be in time enough at Paris for the intended commercial

agreement? He replied, "I rather think you may." One need not be a

conjurer to draw an inference; you will either have finished the

business before I could travel to Paris, or without being missed there

I may go to Bath and repair my nerves.

In this state of uncertainty, when it is easy to perceive affections

are not as we could wish them, nor quite so warm as we had been taught

to believe, it would not be wise to commit the United States;

wherefore I shall rest the business till I hear from you, or until a

more favorable prospect; flattering myself with hopes of your

surmounting the late seeming difficulties. An inconvenience on your

side is preferable to the hazard of a disgrace.

I am, with great regard and respect, &c.

HENRY LAURENS.

* * * * *

THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS TO B. FRANKLIN.

Philadelphia, June 18th, 1783.

Sir,

I have the honor of enclosing you an official letter, directed to our

Ministers Plenipotentiary at Paris.

The resignation of the late Secretary for Foreign Affairs, (occasioned

by his preference of the Chancellorship of the State of New York,

which he could not hold longer and retain his Secretaryship,) has cast

the business of his office on me, till a successor is elected, which I

hope will speedily take place.

As part of the resolution of Congress of the 12th instant, enclosed in

that letter, is of a secret nature, I have written it in cyphers, but

not having that of Mr Livingston's, I thought it best to use Mr

Morris's to you, which he has obligingly supplied me with; so that the

Ministers will be indebted for your decyphering it.

Your letter to Mr Livingston of the 15th of April, enclosing the two

medals, came to hand this morning. I am sorry to find, that you have

cause for similar complaints to those we have been making for two

months past, on the subject of want of intelligence. We have not heard

from any of our Commissioners at Paris, since February, excepting a

letter from Mr Laurens, though our anxiety and expectations have been

wound up to the highest pitch.

I feel myself much indebted for your polite compliment of the medal;

it is thought very elegant, and the device and workmanship much

admired. You will be pleased, Sir, to accept my acknowledgments on

this occasion. As I doubt not but the copper one was designed for Mr

Livingston personally, I shall send it to him by the first convenient

opportunity. He is a worthy deserving character, and the United States

will suffer greatly by his resignation, though I think him justified

in attending to the calls of his private affairs.

You will receive herewith a number of our late newspapers, in which

are inserted many resolves, associations, &c. from all parts of the

country, which I earnestly wish could be kept out of sight. But the

truth is, that the cruelties, ravages, and barbarisms of the refugees

and loyalists, have left the people so sore, that it is not yet time

for them to exercise their good sense and cooler judgment. And that

cannot take place, while the citizens of New York are kept out of

their city, and despoiled daily of their property, by the sending off

their negroes by hundreds, in the face of the treaty. It has been

exceedingly ill judged in the British to retain New York so long, and

to persist in sending away the negroes, as it has irritated the

citizens of America to an alarming degree.

I have the honor to be, &c.

ELIAS BOUDINOT.

* * * * *

HENRY LAURENS TO THE COMMISSIONERS.

London, June 20th, 1783.

Gentlemen,

Permit me to refer to what I had the honor of writing to you the 17th.

You will recollect my suggestions, as soon as we perceived the falling

off from those warm assurances, which had been pressed in March and

April. They were not ill founded. I delayed a week in hopes of

intelligence, and left you with reluctance; the temper of the times

forbids even an essay.

What a happy country is this, where everything pertaining to the

public is rendered to them in public newspapers. See the enclosed,

containing nearly as accurate an account of certain recent

occurrences, as if it had been penned by one of the parties. It might

indeed have been made a little stronger. Modest men are sometimes

restrained from attempting a public good, from a dread of the effects

of envy, of being held up in an invidious light. It would be cruel to

disturb them.

I have heard nothing from America, save what you may have read in the

prints. Tomorrow I shall proceed to Bath, and be waiting for

intelligence, as well from yourselves as from Congress. Some

consolation arises from reflecting, that while I am endeavoring to

mend my health, you suffer no inconvenience from my absence.

With sincere regard and respect,

HENRY LAURENS.

* * * * *

TO THE COUNT DE VERGENNES.

Passy, June 28th, 1783.

Sir,

Mr Grand, banker to the Congress, having laid before us the annexed

state of their affairs in his hands, we conceive ourselves

indispensably obliged to communicate the same to your Excellency, as

some important interests of both countries are concerned.[15]

Before the peace was known in America, and while Mr Morris had hopes

of obtaining the five per cent duty and a larger loan from his

Majesty, the immediate urgent necessities of the army obliged him to

draw bills, and sell them to the merchants, to raise money for the

purchase of provisions, to prevent their starving or disbanding.

The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10 · 第 12 / 33 段