But however brave and stoical Omar seems to be, still he fee

[Illustration]

A PERSIAN PEARL

AND OTHER ESSAYS

BY

CLARENCE S. DARROW

[Illustration]

CHICAGO

C. L. RICKETTS

MDCCCCII

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright

1899

Clarence S. Darrow

------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONTENTS

1 A Persian Pearl 9

2 Walt Whitman 43

3 Robert Burns 77

4 Realism in Literature and Art 107

5 The Skeleton in the Closet 139

A · PERSIAN · PEARL

[Illustration]

A PERSIAN PEARL

The reader and observer is constantly reminded that “there is nothing

new under the sun.” We no sooner find some rare gem of thought or

expression than we discover that it is only an old diamond, polished

anew, perhaps, and offered as an original stone. Neither the reader nor

the writer is always aware that the gem is antique and the setting alone

is new.

The rich mine where the treasure was first found was exhausted in a few

brief years, and then became like all the dust of all the worlds; but

the gem polished and worn by time and use, ever sparkles and shines,

regardless of the fact that the miner’s name is forgotten and his work

alone remains. Thus Nature, the great communist, provides that the

treasures of genius, like her own bountiful gifts of sunlight, rain and

air, shall remain the common property of all her children while any

dwell upon the earth.

Current literature seems to point to the ascendancy of what is often

termed the “pessimistic school.” In one sense this philosophy uncrowns

man and places him in his proper relation to the great universe, of

which he is so small a part; but while it makes less of man, it expects

less from him, and covers his deeds with that cloak of charity, which is

the legitimate garment of the great Unknown. But these modern

reflections on life and its problems, its purposes and lessons, are far

from new. Without venturing a guess as to their origin or age, we take

up that old Persian Pearl,—the “Rubaiyat,” and find on its musty pages

the great thoughts and searching questions, which have ever returned to

man since the intellect was born, and which will still remain unanswered

when the last word shall have been spoken, and the race have run its

course.

It is nearly eight hundred years since Omar Khayyam, the Persian

astronomer, philosopher, and poet, mused and wrote upon the uncertainty

of life, the eternity of time and the mutability of human things. Since

the rose bush was planted above his grave, the material world has been

almost made anew. Art and literature have given countless treasures to

the earth, and science has solved its mysteries without end. But the

riddles of existence—the problems of life, the deep heart of the

universe, the cause and purpose and end of all, are mysteries as dark

and inscrutable as they were eight centuries ago. To quote from the

Rubaiyat:

There was the Door to which I found no Key;

There was the Veil thro’ which I could not see:

Some little talk awhile of Me and Thee

There was—and then no more of Thee and Me.

As Egypt is the newest country visited by the traveler, so this old

book, burnished by the genius of FitzGerald, comes to us as the latest

and profoundest word upon the infinite mysteries which over-shadow human

life. It seems to be the last word, rather than one of the first, spoken

to the perplexed soul of man, calling him from the vain pursuit of

vanities, and asking what all of it is about.

To an egoistic, boasting age and nation, this message, coming from a far

off time and a distant land, reminds us that all wisdom is garnered

neither now nor here. This Persian Pearl remained unpolished for more

than seven hundred years. It was left for Edward FitzGerald carefully

and patiently to burnish up the gem, and make it the thing of beauty

that we know.

It may be that research and study would reveal much of the personal

traits and private life of the great Persian philosopher, whose fame has

so outlived his clay, but with these we can have no concern. It is not

important to know his parents, or whether he had a wife or children, or

cattle or lands. All of these are gone and only his work remains. True,

we cannot but reflect on the personality of the poet in whose brain

these great thoughts were born, but we can know the man only by knowing

his works. Some there are who stand at a distance and view the acts of

the imperfect beings, who at the best stumble and grope along the

uncertain path between the cradle and the grave. All the footsteps that

are straight and true are unnoticed as they pass by, but the irregular,

uncertain, shifting tracks stand out alone to mark the character of the

pilgrim, who bore his heavy load the best he could. These forget that

every son of man travels an unbeaten path—a road beset with dangers and

temptations that no other wanderer met; that his footsteps can be judged

only in the full knowledge of the strength and light he had, the burden

that he carried, the obstacles and temptations that he met, and a

thorough knowledge of every open and secret motive that impelled him

here or there.

That Omar’s steps were often winding and devious, and like those of all

other mortal men, we gather from his words. No doubt his neighbors

delighted in gossiping about the great philosopher, and his reputation

was often tarnished by their idle words. These slanderers have been long

forgotten—they could not live upon the great name they sullied, and we

should not even know he was their prey except for lines like these:

Indeed the Idols I have loved so long

Have done my credit in Men’s eyes much wrong;

Have drown’d my Glory in a shallow Cup,

And sold my reputation for a Song.

Eight hundred years ago, as to-day, the love of wine was one of the

chief weaknesses of the flesh. Doubtless the other frailties of human

nature are of substantially the same kind as eight centuries ago, for

while man may change the fashion of his garment or religion, nature is

ever consistent and persistent, and is the same yesterday, to-day and

forever. But our old human philosopher, like our modern human men, saw

the folly of his ways, and made many a brave resolve, but these good

intentions and solemn purposes melted in the sunshine then the same as

now.

Indeed, indeed, Repentance oft before

I swore—but was I sober when I swore?

And then and then came Spring, and Rose-in-hand

My thread-bare Penitence apieces tore.

But Omar was greater than most of the weak and sinning children of

to-day. His own frailties taught him the rare lesson, that of all the

virtues, charity is the chiefest! And as we read the wondrous product of

his brain and understand the thoughts that stirred his being, we can

know the man better than his neighbors who judged a great soul by the

narrow vision of sordid minds. We know that his purpose was lofty, and

above all the mists and conflicting emotions and desires of his life he

rose majestic and supreme, unsullied by the specks that can only mar the

weak. Let us turn then to the philosophy and poetry of this great soul

to know the man, and as figs are not gathered of thistles, we may be

sure that broad thoughts, high aspirations, and tender charity are born

only of great minds and rare men.

To Omar Khayyam, the so-called sins of men were not crimes, but

weaknesses inherent in their being and beyond their power to prevent or

overcome. He knew that man could not separate himself from all the rest

of nature; and that the rules and conditions of his being were as fixed

and absolute as the revolutions of the planets and the changing seasons

of the year. Above man and his works he saw the heavy hand of destiny,

ever guiding and controlling, ever moving its creature forward to the

inevitable fate that all the centuries had placed in store for the

helpless captive, marching shackled to the block.

There have ever been two views of life. Both philosophies have been made

by man and mostly for him. One places him above all the rest of the

universe, whose infinite mysteries are constantly revolving and changing

before his hazy, wondering gaze. The portion of the world that comes

nearest to his eyes he cannot understand, and his own existence is a

riddle that all the ages have not solved. And yet, amidst it all, one

system teaches that man rules supreme,—and the fate of all the worlds,

or of all that may exist thereon, has no relation to his own. The other

peers into the thick darkness that hangs above, and can see no light, it

does not understand and will not guess; the endless mysteries are not

for mortal man to solve. Its devotees feel themselves part of a mighty

whole, and are powerless to separate their lives from all the rest, and

would not dare to undertake it if they could. They know that in the

great, unlimited universe they are less than the tiniest bubble in the

wildest, angriest sea. That in the words of the Rubaiyat:

We are no other than a moving row

Of magic Shadow-shapes that come and go

Round with this Sun-illumined Lantern held

In Midnight by the Master of the Show.

Omar Khayyam was probably not the first, certainly not the last, to feel

the impotence of man in the great power which animates the whole. He

could have no faith in the cruel religious tenets, which eight centuries

ago in Persia, as ever since in the Christian world, have taught the

responsibility of the helpless victim for the great, blind work in which

he had no part. He seemed to think that back of all the universe, some

intelligent power moved and controlled the world for some purpose

unknown to all except himself, but he could not think that man was in

any way accountable for the whole. To him, the great master sent us here

or there to suit his will, and it was left for us only to obey his

mighty power. The individual units of humanity were to him only:

Impotent Pieces of the Game He plays

Upon this checker-board of Nights and Days;

Hither and thither moves, and checks, and slays,

And one by one back in the Closet lays.

Even this does not sufficiently express his thought of man’s absolute

irresponsibility for his acts.

We have all met the parallel drawn between man and the pottery fashioned

by the moulder from the clay. Perhaps there is no better illustration of

the helplessness of the human being in the hands of the power that

fashioned and shaped him, even ages before his birth,—the uncontrollable

force that determined the length of his body, the color of his hair, the

size and shape of his brain and the contour of his face. But the

comparison made in the beautiful stanza wrought by Omar, and retouched

and gilded by the magic of FitzGerald, is wondrously powerful and fine.

The poet ranges his poor pieces of pottery in line, each representing a

man; each imperfect in structure or form, like all the other creatures

ever made. These poor, imperfect vessels, fresh from the potter, each

pleads its cause and makes excuses for its faults.

After a momentary silence spake

Some vessel of a more ungainly Make:

“They sneer at me for leaning all awry:

What! did the Hand then of the Potter shake?”

When will humanity be great enough and good enough to distinguish

between the fault of the potter and the fault of the pot! When can it

look over the myriads of human beings, each with his flaws and

limitations, and pity instead of blame!

The history of the past is a record of man’s cruel inhumanity to man; of

one imperfect vessel accusing and shattering another for the faults of

both. In ancient times and amongst savage tribes, the old, the infirm,

and the diseased were led out and put to death; even later, the maniac

and imbecile were fettered, chained, beaten, and imprisoned because they

were different from other men. The world has grown a little wiser, and

perhaps humaner, as the centuries have passed away. We have learned to

build asylums, and treat the afflicted with tenderness and care. We have

learned not to blame the dwarf for his stature; the hunchback for his

load; the deaf because they cannot hear, and the blind because they

cannot see. We do not expect the midget to carry the giant’s load, or

the cripple to triumph in a contest of speed. We establish a regulation

size for policemen and soldiers, but we do not put a man to death

because his stature is below the standard fixed. We forgive the size of

the foot, the length of the arm, the shade of the hair, the color of the

eye, and even the form of the skull. But, while we do not blame a man

because he has an ill-shaped head, we punish him because the brain

within conforms to the bone which molds its form. The world has made

guns and swords, racks and dungeons, chains and whips, blocks and

gibbets, and to these have dragged an endless procession thro’ all the

past. It has penned and maimed, tortured and killed, because the

potter’s work was imperfect and the clay was weak. During all the ages

it has punished mental deformity as a crime, and without pity or regret

has crushed the imperfect vessels beneath its feet. Every jail, every

scaffold, every victim—is a monument to its cruelty and blind

unreasoning wrath. Whether it was a fire kindled to burn a heretic in

Geneva,—a gibbet erected to kill a witch in Salem,—or a scaffold made to

put to death an ordinary “criminal,” it has ever been the same,—the

punishment of the creature for the creator’s fault. There might be some

excuse if man could turn from the frail, cracked vessels, and bring to

trial the great potter for the imperfect work of his hand.

But we live in the shadows; we can see only the causes and effects that

are the closest to our eyes. If the clouds would rise, and the sun shine

bright, and our vision reach out into time and space, we might find that

these cracked vessels serve as high a purpose in a great, broad scheme,

as the finest clay, wrought in the most beautiful and perfect form. The

following stanza was born of this philosophy and would inevitably come

from the broad, charitable brain that had studied the creeds that told

of the cruelty of the great Maker, but whose brain and conscience had

not been stunted and warped by their palsying dogmas:

Then said a Second—“Ne’er a peevish Boy

Would break the Bowl from which he drank in joy;

And he that with his hand the Vessel made

Will surely not in after Wrath destroy.”

The cruel religious dogmas, which in Omar’s land and Age, as in our own,

blackened both man and his Maker, had no terrors for a soul like his. He

could not believe in eternal punishment. The doctrine was a slander,

alike to God and man. He felt something of the greatness of a force that

could permeate and move the countless worlds, which make up the

limitless, unfathomed infinite we call the Universe. He saw in man one

of the smallest and most insignificant toys created by this power to

serve some unknown end; and he could not believe that the Master-Builder

would demand of his imperfect children more than he had furnished them

the strength to give. His faith in the justice of man’s case before the

great Judge is shown in the following stanza:

Oh Thou, who didst with pitfall and with gin

Beset the Road I was to wander in,

Thou wilt not with Predestin’d Evil round

Enmesh, and then impute my Fall to Sin!

But even more strongly he presents the case of God against man, and man

against God, for all the crimes and miseries and sufferings of the

world. It would doubtless be difficult in all the literature of the

earth to find a juster, bolder statement of the old question of the

responsibility for sin. To some minds, this strong expression may seem

like blasphemy, but it is manly and courageous, logical and just.

Oh, Thou, who Man of baser Earth didst make

And ev’n with Paradise devise the Snake;

For all the Sin wherewith the face of Man

Is blacken’d—Man’s forgiveness give—and take!

This is not the cringing prayer of the coward, who asks God’s

forgiveness to appease his wrath, but the utterance of a noble soul, who

asks forgiveness for the shortcomings of his life, and at the same time

pardons his Maker for creating him as he did. The world has heard much

of man’s duty to God, of the responsibility which the unconsulted,

fragile children of a day owe to the power that is responsible for all.

It is time we heard more of the duty of God to man; the responsibility

of the Creator for making “conscious something” out of unthinking,

unfeeling clay.

“Oh, many a cup of this forbidden Wine

Must drown the memory of that insolence!”

The world has talked the same nonsense of the duty of children to

parents. It has taught this, because parents are larger, and have the

brute power to compel obedience to their demands. All the duties are

from parents to children,—from those who thoughtlessly, wantonly, to

satisfy their own desires, call into conscious being a human life,—send

another soul with all its responsibilities out on the great, wide sea,

to be tossed and buffeted and torn, until, mangled and dead, it is

thrown out upon the sands to bleach.

But after all, whether it was wise or unwise, just or unjust, we have

been placed upon the earth as sentient beings and charged with the

responsibilities of life; and practical philosophy asks the question,

what does it mean, and how shall we take the journey which a higher

power has decreed that we shall make?

The poet and the dreamer and the copy book have told us much of the

meaning of life. We often repeat these lessons to make ourselves believe

them true. When we feel a doubt casting its shadow across our path, we

read them once again to drive the doubt away; and yet, in spite of all,

we know absolutely nothing of the scheme, or whether there is any kind

of plan. We are only whistlers passing through a graveyard, with our

ears tied close and our eyes shut fast. It would surely be as well to

step boldly up and read the inscription on the marble tomb and then walk

round and look at the vacant, grinning space upon the other side, calmly

waiting to record our name.

Measured by the philosophy of to-day, Omar Khayyam was a pessimist; he

was not gifted with second sight. He saw no spooks and ghosts, and he

would not look out into the midnight, and declare that his eyes

discerned a glorious rainbow, bright with fresh colors and unbounded

hopes. All the proud promises and brave assumptions and false theories

of the world were to him a mockery and a sham. The mysticisms of

religion and philosophy alike were hollow and bare. The “jarring sects”

and quibbling doctors, with their fine-spun webs, were worthy the

attention only of children and professors. This is the way he put them

down:

Myself when young did eagerly frequent

Doctor and Saint, and heard great argument

About it and about; but evermore

Came out by the same door wherein I went.

While it is true that in the common meaning Omar was a pessimist, still

this word, like many others, is rarely well defined. All men understand

the uncertainties of life, the disappointments and troubles of

existence, and the infinitesimal time that is reluctantly parceled out

to each mortal from the eternity that had no beginning and will have no

end. The pessimist looks at all the hurry and rush, the torment and

strife, the ambitions and disappointments that are the common lot, and

can see no prizes so tempting as rest and peace. He makes the most of

what he has, and looks contentedly forward to the long sleep that brings

relief at last.

Omar Khayyam was not deceived by all the glitter and bustle of the

world. He saw the stage from behind the curtain, as well as from the

circle before the scenes. He looked on the great surging mass of men,

ever pulling and pushing, striving and trying, working and fighting, as

if all eternity was theirs in which to build, and all unmindful of the

silent bookkeeper, who could be deceived by no false entries, and ever

remembered to demand his dues. Of life he said:

‘Tis but a Tent where takes his one day’s rest

A Sultan to the Realm of Death addrest;

The Sultan rises, and the dark Ferrash

Strikes, and prepares it for another Guest.

In the presence of all that the world had to offer,—while honors and

glories fell fast upon his head, he still could not close his eyes to

the facts of existence, and the mortality of human things. It may be

that he mused too much upon the great fact that ever sternly faces

life,—the great being before whom all monarchs bow, and in whose

presence all crowns are shattered. To the boasting and forgetful, these

words may not be pleasant, but they still are true:

Why, all the Saints and Sages who discuss’d

Of the Two worlds so learnedly are thrust

Like foolish Prophets forth; their words to Scorn

Are scatter’d and their Mouths are stopt with Dust.

Neither the great nor the good could avoid the common fate; the

unyielding messenger came alike to call the proud Sultan and the good

and kindly friend.

For some we loved, the loveliest and the best

That from his Vintage rolling Time has prest,

Have drunk their Cup a Round or two before,

And one by one crept silently to rest.

Death is so common that we sometimes wonder why men make plans,—why they

ever toil or spin. But, of course, we can see only the leaves that fall

from other stalks. Rarely do we feel that all this has a personal

meaning, and that our turn soon must come. Omar looked at the stricken

friends around him, and thus mused:

Whether at Naishapur or Babylon,

Whether the Cup with sweet or bitter run,

The Wine of Life keeps oozing drop by drop,

The leaves of Life keep falling one by one.

It has never required the great or the learned to note the constant

falling of the leaves and the ceaseless running of the sands. It is

mainly from this that systems of religion have been evolved. Man has

ever sought to make himself believe that these things are not what they

seem; that, in reality, death is only birth, and the body but a prison

for the soul. This may be true, but the constant cries and pleadings of

the ages have brought back no answering sound to prove that death is

anything but death.

Our old philosopher could not accept these pleasing creeds on faith. He

preferred to plant his feet upon the shifting doubtful sands, rather

than deceive himself by alluring and delusive hopes. Upon the old

question of immortality, he could answer only what he knew, and this is

what he said:

Strange, is it not? that of the myriads who

Before us pass’d the door of Darkness through

Not one returns to tell us of the Road

Which to discover we must travel too.

This stanza is perhaps gloomy and hopeless, but it is thoughtful, and

brave, and beautiful. We may seek to be children if we will, but

whatever our desires, we cannot strangle the questions that ever rise

before our minds and will not be put away. To our own souls we should be

just and true. Peace and comfort, when gained at the sacrifice of

courage and integrity, are purchased at too high a price. The truth

alone can make us free, and

“One flash of it within the tavern caught

Better than in the Temple lost outright.”

Yes, one flash of the true light is better than all the creeds and

dogmas. It is better, even though these hold out the fairest prospects

and the brightest dreams, and the flash of true light is only the

blackest midnight.

Not only would Omar take away the hope of Heaven, but he leaves us with

little to boast while we live upon the earth. Our short, obscure

existence is not felt or noticed in the great sweep of time and the

resistless movement of the years. Along the pathway of the world we

leave scarce a footprint, and our loudest voice and bravest words are as

completely lost as if spoken in the presence of Niagara’s roar.

And fear not lest Existence closing your

Account and mine, should know the like no more;

The Eternal Saki from that Bowl has pour’d

Millions of Bubbles like us, and will pour.

The weakness and littleness of man has been the subject of endless words

before and since, but never has poet put it more strongly than here. The

Eternal Saki—the great wine pourer, tips his pitcher and turns out

millions of bubbles, and still they come forever, and each of us is one.

But however brave and stoical Omar seems to be, still he feels sad when

witnessing the flight of years and the ravages of time. It is, of

course, useless to fight the inevitable, and the strongest will must

bend and break before the weakening touch of age. Whether it is good or

bad, all cling to existence, and sadly and reluctantly let go the

tendrils that hold to pulsing life. The fading of Spring and youth, and

the coming of Autumn with its suggestions of the approaching end, is

most beautiful and touching in this marvelous book:

Yet, Ah, that Spring should vanish with the Rose!

That Youth’s sweet-scented manuscript should close!

The Nightingale that in the branches sang,

Ah whence, and whither flown again, who knows!

This strain of sadness is sincere and true. To recognize the inevitable

and not pretend to deceive one’s self is one thing, but to think that

all is just and wise and best may be quite another. Omar felt that fate

was inexorable, relentless and hard.

The moving Finger writes; and having writ,

Moves on; nor all your piety nor Wit

Shall lure it back to cancel half a line,

Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it.

He would have tempered her hardness with a little human love and tender

pity, and bade the great Recorder leave much untold. He recognized the

fact that the scheme could not be changed, and that even our brief

existence depended upon our subservience to the great will that would

neither break nor bend; but he still regretted that it was not better

and kinder and more forgiving than it is. There is almost a wail in the

strain of sadness in which he laments the rigor of unyielding fate.

Would that some winged Angel ere too late

Arrest the yet unfolded Roll of fate,

And make the stern Recorder otherwise

Enregister, or quite obliterate!

Ah Love! could you and I with him conspire

To grasp this sorry Scheme of Things entire,

Would we not shatter it to bits—and then

Re-mould it nearer to the Heart’s Desire?

It is impossible to live to a moderate age without forming some idea of

the conduct of life; this may be practical or theoretical, or both. But

either with or without consciousness we construct some plan of life and

its purpose, and our daily conduct conforms more or less closely to the

theory that we accept. The religionist teaches that the hope of future

rewards and punishments must be kept before the mind, or man would give

himself completely to indulgence, and the race would die. This theory

loses sight of the fact that Nature herself is constantly wiping out

those who defy her laws, and preserving longest those who conform to the

conditions she has imposed. Excesses of all kinds destroy and weaken

existence, and bring the natural penalty, which leaves only the more

rational and temperate to perpetuate life upon the earth. Of course

these observations apply, not to the fashions and forms and conventions

of man, except so far as these conform to the unbending laws of nature,

which must ever be supreme.

From Omar Khayyam’s views of life, he could not but think that it was

the duty of every pilgrim to get the most he could in his journey

through the world. But, really, all accept this obvious fact. The

Religionist says merely that man should be less happy here,—that his

enjoyment may be the greater in the world to come. It is not in the

theory as to life’s purpose that men have differed, but as to the

conduct that really brings the greatest happiness when the last balance

has been struck, and the book is forever closed. Our poet could not see

the days and years go by and life’s sands swiftly running out, and still

postpone all enjoyment to some far off, misty time. He believed in the

reality of to-day, and that beyond the present all was but a vision and

a dream. In his day, as in ours, the priests held out the hope of heaven

and fear of hell, to keep the wanderer in the narrow path. But Omar was

a philosopher and astronomer. He peered into the infinite depths of

endless space, and could see only moving, whirling worlds like ours, and

could find no place for heaven or hell. What the mysteries of astronomy

could not reveal, the theories of life left equally in the dark. While

he refused to be moved by a literal heaven and hell, he yet felt a deep

meaning attached to these old religious views. The humane, progressive

thinkers of to-day have scarcely gone beyond this old seer, who lived

eight centuries ago and pondered the same problems over which our

theologians wrangle now. The following stanza gives an interpretation of

these religious dogmas, which for beauty and breadth and insight seems

to be the latest product of ethical, religious thought, instead of the

musty musings of an old pagan, who has been dust almost eight hundred

years:

I sent my Soul through the Invisible,

Some letter of that After-Life to spell;

And by and by my Soul returned to me,

And answer’d “I Myself am Heav’n and Hell.”

If these places are but states of consciousness, it of course must

follow that we make our own heaven and hell, and it is, therefore, the

right and duty of each, not to wait for some dreamy mirage born of old

superstition, unmanly fear, and unfounded faith, but to take the

present, fleeting moment, and with it do the best we can. This stanza

may seem painfully sad and hopeless, but it contains the true philosophy

of life:

Ah, make the most of what we yet may spend,

Before we too into the Dust descend;

Dust unto Dust, and under Dust, to lie,

Sans Wine, sans Song, sans Singer, and—sans End!

Not only is the present the all important time, but the realities know

nothing except the present. There is no moment but the one that’s

here,—the past is gone, the next one has not come, and he that misses

the present loses all there is.

Some for the Glories of This World, and some

Sigh for the Prophet’s paradise to come;

Ah, take the Cash, and let the Credit go,

Nor heed the rumble of a distant Drum!

As to how the pleasures of life are to be found, men never have agreed

and never can. Our view of pleasure, like our feelings and emotions,

grows from the condition of our being, and is the result of causes that

we did not create and cannot control. Some there are who look at all the

strife and suffering of the world, and feel no kinship to the great,

surging mass that moves and feels and thinks. These walk silently along

the path alone, oblivious alike to the pleasures and the sufferings of

the world around. Others there are whose souls are so sensitive that

they feel the joys and sorrows of the world, and who cannot separate

their lives from all the sentient, moving things that teem and swarm

upon the earth. Both can and must feel those appetites and desires that

are ever incident to being. Without these, nature could neither bring

life upon the earth nor sustain it when it came. It is in the balancing

of these feelings that nature almost necessarily makes the imperfect

man. Unless the emotions and desires are sufficiently developed, the

creature is cold, impassive, pulseless clay. If too much developed, it

runs the risk of sacrificing the higher emotions and more lasting

enjoyments to the fleeting, sensual pleasures of the hour. Almost every

person must stand upon one side or the other of this shadowy line, which

no man can see, and which he would have no power to cross, even if he

knew where it ran.

Perhaps the Rubaiyat shows too much leaning toward the sensual; too

great fondness for the vine. Some of the allusions were perhaps

symbolical, but still, Omar doubtless was very fond of wine and found in

its use one of the chief purposes of life. Philosophy and theology could

not satisfy his mind. These furnished only visionary, inconsistent

theories of existence, utterly barren and futile,—wholly purposeless and

wrong. After studying and wrangling and disputing, he threw them to the

winds and reached out for the realities,—however transitory and

unsatisfactory these realities seemed to be. His exchange of theories

and mysticisms for wine may be symbolical or not, but whether literal or

figurative, he could hardly be cheated by the trade. This is the way he

relates the story of his change of heart:

You know, My Friends, with what a brave Carouse

I made a Second Marriage in my house;

Divorced old barren Reason from my Bed,

And took the Daughter of the Vine to spouse.

After throwing the theoretical philosophy to the winds, he turned to the

vine to learn what life really meant. No doubt, the vessel here is

figuratively used. It might mean a wine cup, it might mean feeding a

beggar, it might mean a warm room and comfortable dress. It meant

something besides the intangible, barren theories, which have ever

furnished theologians and professors with the pleasing occupation of

splitting hairs and quibbling about the meaning of terms.

Then to the Lip of this poor earthen Urn

I lean’d, the secret of my Life to learn;

And Lip to Lip it murmur’d—“While you live,

Drink!—for, once dead, you never shall return.”

Neither would it do to postpone the pleasures of the wine,—time is

fleeting, and every hour may be the last. Life has no space for

resolutions or regrets. These only rob existence of a portion of the

poor prizes that she stingily scatters into the ring to be fought and

scrambled after by the crowd.

Come, fill the Cup, and in the fire of Spring

Your Winter-garment of Repentance fling;

The Bird of Time has but a little way

To flutter—and the Bird is on the Wing.

It is not the dainty sipping of the wine that our poet commends for the

peace of the soul, but the giving up of self to the enjoyment of the

hour,—the complete abandonment that forgets time and space and eternity,

and knows only the moment that is.

Perplext no more with Human or Divine,

To-morrow’s tangle to the winds resign,

And lose your fingers in the tresses of

The Cypress-slender Minister of Wine.

This stanza may mean wine,—it may mean any strong purpose, or intense

emotion that takes possession of our life,—that makes us its devoted

slave, anxious to dare or suffer for the privilege of enlisting in a

cause. That Omar knew something of life’s pleasures and realities,

besides the wine he lauded, is apparent from his work. His insight was

so deep that he could not be deceived by the tinsel and glitter and

trappings that make up the vain show with which men deceive others, and

attempt to beguile themselves. In Persia eight hundred years ago, there

were probably no twenty-story buildings, no railroads, nor street cars,

nor telegraph wires; perhaps no chambers of commerce, nor banks; but no

doubt these old Mohammedans had much as useless and vain and artificial

as these inventions of a later day. There was then, as now, the master

with all the false luxury that idleness could create in that land and

time; there was also, as to-day, the hopeless slave, whose only purpose

on the earth was to minister to the parasite and knave; and both of

these, master and man alike, were helpless prisoners in the schemes and

devices, the machinery and inventions, the worthless appendages and

appliances that bound and enslaved them, and that have held the world

with ever increasing strength to the present day.

But Omar knew that all of this was a delusion and a snare;—that it

failed of the purpose that it meant to serve. He turned from these

vanities to a simpler, saner life, and found the sweetest and most

lasting pleasures close to the heart of that great nature, to which man

must return from all his devious wanderings, like the lost child that

comes back to its mother’s breast. What simpler and higher happiness has

all the artificial civilization of the world been able to create than

this:

A Book of Verses underneath the bough,

A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread and Thou

Beside me singing in the Wilderness—

Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow.

It is these bright spots in life’s desert that make us long to stay.

These hours of friendship and close companionship of congenial souls

that seem the only pleasures that are real, and from which no regrets

can come. It is away from the bustle and glare of the world, above its

petty strifes, and its cruel taunts, in the quiet and trust of true

comradeship, that we forget the evil and fall in love with life. And our

old philosopher, with all his pessimism, with all his doubts and

disappointments, knew that here was the greatest peace and happiness

that weary, mortal man could know. In the presence of the friends he

loved, and the comradeship of congenial lives, he could not but regret

the march of time and the flight of years, which heralded the coming of

the end. Poor Omar was like all the rest that ever lived—he looked

forward into the dark, unknown sea, and shuddered as he felt the rising

water on his feet.

All of us know how small and worthless are our lives when measured by

the infinite bubbles poured out by the great creative power. All know

that we shall quickly sink into the great dark sea and the waves will

close above us as if we had not been. And yet we do not really think of

the world as moving on the same when we have spoken our last lines and

retired behind the scenes. To the world we are little,—to ourselves we

are all. We almost hope that for a time at least we shall be

missed,—that some souls shall sorrow and some lives feel pain. We hope

that here and there some pilgrim will tell of a burden that we helped

him bear, or a road we tried to smooth. That sometime when the merry

feast is on, a former friend shall feel a momentary shadow rest upon his

heart at the thought of the face he used to know and the voice that now

is still. Thus Omar and FitzGerald mused and hoped and told in

beautiful, pathetic lines:

Yon rising Moon that looks for us again—

How oft hereafter will she wax and wane;

How oft hereafter rising look for us

Through this same Garden—and for one in vain!

And when like her, O Saki, you shall pass

Among the Guests Star-scatter’d on the Grass,

And in your blissful errand reach the spot

Where I made one—turn down an empty Glass!

WALT

WHITMAN

[Illustration]

WALT WHITMAN

The work of Whitman stands alone in the literature of the world. Both in

substance and construction he ignored all precedents and dared to be

himself. All the rules of form and taste must be unlearned before the

world can accept his style as true literary art. Still it may be that

Walt Whitman was a poet, and that sometime the world will look back and

marvel at the mechanical precision and glittering polish that confines

and emasculates for the sake of a purely artificial form.

Measured by the common rules, Whitman’s work is neither poetry nor

prose; it is remotely allied to the wild chanting of the primitive

bards, who looked about at the fresh new marvels of earth and sky and

sea, and unhampered by forms and rules and customs, sang of the miracles

of the universe and the mysteries of life. Whitman seems one of those

old bards, fresh from the hand of nature, young with the first creation,

the newest handwork of the great Master, untaught in any schools,

unfettered by any of the myriad chords, which time is ever weaving about

the brains and hearts and consciences of men as the world grows gray; a

primitive bard of nature, born by some chance or accident in this old,

tired, worn-out world, dropped into this Nineteenth century with its

machines and conventions, its artificial life, its unnatural morals and

its fettered limbs. He alone in all the ages seems to have been

specially given to the world, still fresh with the imprint of the

Creator’s hand, and standing amid all our false conventions, natural,

simple, true, “naked and not ashamed.” To the world with its crowded

cities, its diseased bodies, its unnatural desires, its narrow religion,

and its false morals, he comes like a breeze of the morning, from the

mountains or the sea. Aye, like a breath of that great, creative life,

which touched the fresh world and brought forth the green grass, the

sparkling waters and the growing, beauteous, natural earth.

No one ever fell in love with Whitman’s work for its literary art, but

his work must live or die because of his philosophy of life and the

material he chose from which to weave his songs. It is in his whole

point of view that Walt Whitman stands so much alone. No one else has

ever looked on the universe and life as this man did. If religion means

devotion to that great unseen power that is ever manifest in all of

nature’s works, then Walt Whitman was the most reverent soul that ever

lived. This man alone of all the world dared defend the Creator in every

part and parcel of his work. The high mountains, the deep valleys, the

broad plains and the wide seas; the feelings, the desires, and the

passions of man; all forms of life and being that exist upon the earth,

were to him but several manifestations of a great creative power that

formed them all alike, made each one needful to the whole, and every

portion sacred through its Master’s stamp.

And I will show that there is no imperfection in the present and can be

none in the future,

And I will show that whatever happens to anybody it may be turn’d to

beautiful results,

And I will show that nothing can happen more beautiful than death.

And I will thread a thread through my poems that time and events are

compact,

And that all the things of the universe are perfect miracles, each as

profound as any.

I will not make poems with reference to parts.

But I will make poems, songs, thoughts, with reference to ensemble,

And I will not sing with reference to a day, but with reference to all

days.

Whitman’s philosophy knew no evil and no wrong. The fact of existence

proved the right of existence; in the great workshop of nature every

tool had its special use and its rightful place.

The imperfections of the world come from the narrow visions of men. If

the perspective is right, the universe is right. From the narrow valley

the house may look old and worn, the fences decayed, the fields barren,

the woods scraggy and the cliff ragged and bare; but climb to the only

place where either life or landscape can be rightly seen, the mountain

top, and look once more. The hills, the valley, the stream, the woods,

and the farms have melted and blended into one harmonious whole, and

every imperfection has been swept away. The universe is filled with

myriad worlds as important as our own, each one a tiny floating speck in

an endless sea of space—each whirling, turning, moving on and on and on,

through the countless ages, past and yet to come. No one can tell the

purpose of their tireless, endless flight through space; but still we

know that each has an orbit of its own, and every world is related to

the rest, and every grain of sand and the weakest, feeblest spark of

power has its needful place in the balance of the whole. So all of good,

and all of bad, and all of life, and all of death, and all of all, has

the right to be and must needs be. Walt Whitman did not even know how to

divide the evil from the good, but he sang them both alike.

I am not the poet of goodness only, I do not decline to be the poet of

wickedness also.

What blurt is this about virtue and about vice?

Evil propels me and reform of evil propels me, I stand indifferent.

The universe can make no mistakes, every particle of energy that has

permeated the world since time began, has been working toward a

completer system and a more harmonious whole. There is a soul of truth

in error; there is a soul of good in evil. From the trials and sorrows

and disappointments of life, even from its bitterness and doubt and sin,

are often born the holiest desires, the sincerest endeavors and the most

righteous deeds.

Sometimes with one I love I fill myself with rage for fear I effuse

unreturn’d love,

But now I think there is no unreturn’d love, the pay is certain one way

or another,

(I loved a certain person ardently and my love was not return’d,

Yet out of that I have written these songs.)

This is the old, old philosophy, ever forgotten, yet ever present. It is

sure in the world of mechanics, it is equally true in the world of

morals and of life. Nothing is lost; the force that once was heat is

transformed to light; the flood that destroyed the grain, comes at last

to turn the miller’s wheel. What we call sin and evil make the

experiences of life and go to the upbuilding of character and the

development of man. We can know only what we have felt, and however much

we try to deceive others, we can tell only of the experiences we

ourselves have had. The poorest life is the one that has no tale to

tell. In the doubts and darkness of life, in the turbulence of mind and

the anguish of the soul, it is most consoling to feel that resignation

and confidence which comes from a realization that all is right and that

you are master of yourself and at peace with God and man. This calm,

optimistic, self-reliant philosophy is ever present with its consoling

power in all Walt Whitman’s work.

I have said that the soul is not more than the body,

And I have said that the body is not more than the soul,

And nothing, not God, is greater to one than one’s self is,

And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own funeral

drest in his shroud,

And I or you pocketless of a dime may purchase the pick of the earth,

And to glance with an eye or show a bean in its pod confounds the

learning of all times,

And there is no object so soft but it makes a hub for the wheel’d

universe,

And I say to any man or woman, Let your soul stand cool and composed

before a million universes.

And I say to mankind, Be not curious about God,

For I who am curious about each, am not curious about God,

(No array of terms can say how much I am at peace about God and about

death).

I hear and behold God in every object, yet understand God not in the

least,

Nor do I understand who there can be more wonderful than myself.

Why should I wish to see God better than this day?

I see something of God each hour of the twenty-four and each moment

then,

In the faces of men and women I see God, and in my own face in the

glass,

I find letters from God dropt in the street, and every one is sign’d by

God’s name,

And I leave them where they are, for I know that wheresoe’er I go,

Others will punctually come for ever and ever.

This is not the boasting of the ignorant egotist who vaunts himself

above his fellow man, but the calm, conscious serenity of a great soul,

who has learned the patient philosophy of life.

There is an egotism that is cheap and vulgar and born of ignorance

alone. There is an egotism that comes from the knowledge that after all

what we are depends not upon the estimate of the world, but upon the

integrity and character of ourselves. This consciousness of individual

worth brings that peace of soul, “which the world can neither give nor

take away.”

I know I am august,

I do not trouble my spirit to vindicate itself or be understood,

I see that the elementary laws never apologize,

(I reckon I behave no prouder than the level I plant my house by, after

all),

I exist as I am, that is enough,

If no other in the world be aware I sit content.

One world is aware and by far the largest to me, and that is myself;

And whether I come to my own to-day or in ten thousand or ten million

years,

I can cheerfully take it now, or with equal cheerfulness I can wait.

My foothold is tennon’d and mortis’d in granite,

I laugh at what you call dissolution,

And I know the amplitude of time.

Happy is the man that has climbed to the height on which Walt Whitman

stood. Happy is he that has mastered the haste and impatience of youth,

and is content to bide his time. Happy is he that has so far solved the

problem of life as to know that reward is not received from others and

cannot be withheld by others, but can be given only by ourselves. Such a

man has struck the subtle harmony which unites his soul with the

universal life and he knows that no one but himself can cut the cord.

To a great mass of men and women, Walt Whitman is known almost alone by

that portion of his work called “Children of Adam.” These poems have

called forth the fiercest opposition and the bitterest denunciation, and

if the common judgment is correct, they are obscene and vile. While this

portion of his book is by far the smallest part, still, before the court

of public opinion, he must stand or fall upon these lines. In one sense

public opinion is right, for unless these stanzas can be defended, his

point of view is wrong, and Walt Whitman’s work will die. We need not

accept all he did, or give unstinted praise to all his work, but his

scheme is consistent in every portion of his thought, and his point of

view will determine the place he shall fill in art and life.

A Persian Pearl, and Other Essays · 第 1 / 6 段