APRIL 17, 1900

The west wind this morning had a rolling sonorousness which sent my

thoughts flying, swift as light, across all the little intervening

ridges, over the plains, over the villages, across endless housetops,

through multitudinous suburbs, over the big, ugly, stately town; out

again, over fresh sweeps of more or less encumbered green fields,

hedgerows, lanes, roads; past meadows and orchards, redolent of

centuries of care; past brickfields and coalfields, redolent only of

defiling greed; over a fretful space of sea; across more fields, less

enclosed, less cultivated, but certainly not less green. On and on

breathlessly, until I stood--free of all encumbrances, free of any

thought of luggage, conveyance, or the need of a roof to shelter

under--upon a very familiar spot, close to the tumbling breast of the

Atlantic.

The clearness, or lack of clearness, with which certain familiar spots

rise before the eye is one of the minor mysteries of life; mysteries

which like many larger ones we are never likely to clear up entirely to

our satisfaction. There are moments in my experience when such a spot as

this that I am thinking of, is in a sense _more_ vivid to me away from

it than if I were standing there in person; when every tuft of bog

myrtle becomes clearly visible; every yard of “drift” or of “boulder

clay” shows in its entirety; the very stones fallen from them, and lying

like small cannon-balls upon the beach, being all able to be counted.

The waves toss; the clouds roll wearily; the seaweed rises and falls, as

it naturally would. No scene in a cinematograph could by any possibility

be clearer.

This is the vivid condition. An hour later one tries to conjure up the

same familiar scene, and not a detail will rise to one’s bidding. Not a

leaf, not a stone, not a wave will become manifest. Clearness is gone. A

dull, blurred impression is all that remains. The landscape as a whole

may be there, but its details are lost. That living,

multitudinous-tinted foreground has vanished as though it had never

existed.

It must have been the scent of the bog plants which conferred that

momentary impression upon me this morning. That scents “open the wards

of memory with a key” we all know. They do more, for they sweep away for

the moment those films which ordinarily cover the mental eye, so that

during that moment we really do see. Of all scents commend me for this

awakening quality to the boggy ones. They alone in my experience are

really transformatory. For the brief time that their aroma is in one’s

nostrils one actually _is_ in the place that they recall.

It is a proof of the demoralising effect of ownership that one of my

first impulses nowadays is a desire to transfer the plants that I see,

sometimes that I merely remember, from where they are to where I happen

to want them. Yet, when one thinks of it, what an outrage! Why should

one desire to do anything of the sort? Conceive the contrast, the

downfall; the roominess, the elemental breadth, the cool, rain-saturated

comfort of the one setting; the cramped limitation, the unpalatable

dryness of the other. Not that I would for worlds disparage our own

faithful coppice; to do so would be to show myself the merest of

ingrates. Was I not an alien, and did it not befriend me? Was I not

roofless, and did it not offer its soil for us to lift a roof over?

Still, when one tries to place the one scene beside the other the

contrast becomes farcical. The very wind--the cold, unsentimental

wind--must be sensible of such a difference. How much more then a

root-extending, acutely sensitive, living thing!

I have a profound affection for bog plants, which I hope some of them

respond to, for they thrive fairly. Others are exceedingly difficult to

establish, and rarely look anything but starved and homesick. Amongst

these are the butterworts. Why the translation should so particularly

affect them I have yet to learn, but the fact is unmistakable. Not all

the water of all our taps, not all the peat of all our hillsides will

persuade them to be contented. In vain I have wooed them with the

wettest spots I could find; in vain erected poor semblances of tussocks

for their benefit; have puddled the peat till it seemed impossible that

any creature unprovided with eyes could distinguish it from a bit of

real bog. No, die they will, and die they hitherto always have.

The sundews, on the other hand, are much less hard to please. Indeed,

considering that at least one species grows wild within a few miles of

us, it would be the height of affectation were they to refuse to

tolerate us. I find myself falling into the habit of thinking that I am

inhabiting here a region of eternal thirstiness, devoid of the materials

of sustaining any vegetable more requiring in the matter of water than a

gaillardia. Yet, when one considers the matter seriously, England is not

precisely the Great Sahara! There are brown streams, purling brooks,

dripping wells, rushy meadows, even puddles and bog-holes, to be found a

good deal nearer to this spot than the Atlantic. We are purblind

citizens all of us; apt to dogmatise largely upon an uncommonly small

substratum of knowledge. Like the moles and the blindworms we know

remarkably well the few inches that we can actually feel and touch; but

with regard to what John Locke calls “the rest of the vast expansum,”

that we give up to fog and practical non-existence, thereby saving

ourselves from the trouble of knowing anything about it.

A Garden Diary, September 1899—September 1900 · 第 43 / 68 题