CHRISTMAS-DAY, 4 P.M.

Since luncheon I have been to see a neighbour, in the vague hope that

some fresh war news might have arrived this morning. There was none of

course, and I walked home again between banks of withered bracken and

trailing bramble, under the big tree-hollies, glistening all over their

surfaces with a thousand reminders of Christmas, and of its gifts.

England is so big, and old, and sensible that she does not generally

care about Christmas presents, but there is one present that, I take it,

she would dearly like to have to-day. Shiploads of holly, forests of

mistletoe are hers for the asking, but that one little leaf of victor’s

laurel that she wants so badly, that she would so gladly pin upon that

broad breast of hers, this, it seems, is denied her. It may come

to-morrow. It _must_, we all, not alone Cuttle, feel convinced, come

before long, but it will not come in time for her Christmas-box.

What an odd convention it is, when one thinks of it, that habit of

embodying a country in an individual! Considered seriously the whole

contention is absurd. To talk of a nation as a person is to talk sheer

nonsense. If one handles the idea a little it tumbles to pieces in one’s

fingers. The fiction of unity resolves itself into a mere vortex of

atoms, all moving in different ways, and moreover with a different

general drift in each successive generation. As a matter of fact I doubt

whether Englishmen, who are nothing if not practical, ever do think of

their own country as an individual, unless one of them happens to be

called upon to design a coin or a cartoon. The whole idea is extraneous,

a survival from classical days, and the lumbering absurdities which are

now and then dragged about the streets only go to prove how far from the

genius of the people such representations really are.

Perhaps it is because I am not English that I find myself falling so

readily into the trick. There was a time,--not a very recent one--when I

thought of England habitually in that light, and in the most truculent

fashion possible. In my eyes she stood visibly out as the Great Bully,

the Supreme Tyrant, red with the blood of Ireland and Irish heroes. It

was always _she_ and _her_ then; indeed it was only by keeping up the

fiction of an incarnate Saxondom that indignation could be retained at

the proper boiling point. To turn from the past to the present was to

spoil the whole effect. In place of War, Famine, Massacre, one only got

dull political controversies, or equally dull agrarian disturbances. For

the Raleighs, the Sydneys, the Straffords, the Cromwells,--vast

impressive figures, large and lurid--only a group of rather harassed

gentlemen, “well-meaning English officials,” painfully endeavouring to

steer their way so as to offend everyone as little as possible. Yes, I

had quite a respectable capacity for hatred in those days, and

England--that historic England of which I knew absolutely

nothing--enjoyed the greater part of it. Especially, I remember, that I

used to gloat over the notion of some day or other a great national

HUMILIATION befalling her--a Sedan, a Moscow--I hardly knew what;

retribution at all events in some very visible and dramatic form. With

what glee I used to picture her standing helplessly before the nations;

without a friend or an ally to turn to; naked and ashamed; crushed

bleeding to the earth, as she had so often crushed Ireland; a mark for

every wagging head----

Well, well, thus we play the fool, and the spirits of the wise sit in

the clouds and mock us! Here am I walking home along an English lane,

and almost wringing my hands in despair because such a very mild and

colourless version of those old cherished dreams has befallen mine

ancient enemy!

* * * * *

A Garden Diary, September 1899—September 1900 · 第 16 / 68 题