CHAPTER VII. HERESY AND SCHISM.

You may talk about religion with a free and open mind,

For ten dollars you may criticize a judge;

You may discuss in politics the newest thing you find,

And open scientific truth to all the deaf and blind,

But there's one place where the brain must never budge!

CHORUS.

Oh, the Home is Utterly Perfect!

And all its works within!

To say a word about it--

To criticize or doubt it--

To seek to mend or move it--

To venture to improve it--

Is The Unpardonable Sin!

--“Old Song.”

Mr. Porne took an afternoon off and came with his wife to hear their

former housemaid lecture. As many other men as were able did the same.

All the members not bedridden were present, and nearly all the guests

they had invited.

So many were the acceptances that a downtown hall had been taken; the

floor was more than filled, and in the gallery sat a block of servant

girls, more gorgeous in array than the ladies below whispering excitedly

among themselves. The platform recalled a “tournament of roses,” and,

sternly important among all that fragrant loveliness, sat Mrs. Dankshire

in “the chair” flanked by Miss Torbus, the Recording Secretary, Miss

Massing, the Treasurer, and Mrs. Ree, tremulous with importance in her

official position. All these ladies wore an air of high emprise, even

more intense than that with which they usually essayed their public

duties. They were richly dressed, except Miss Torbus, who came as near

it as she could.

At the side, and somewhat in the rear of the President, on a chair quite

different from “the chair,” discreetly gowned and of a bafflingly

serene demeanor, sat Miss Bell. All eyes were upon her--even some opera

glasses.

“She's a good-looker anyhow,” was one masculine opinion.

“She's a peach,” was another, “Tell you--the chap that gets her is well

heeled!” said a third.

The ladies bent their hats toward one another and conferred in flowing

whispers; and in the gallery eager confidences were exchanged, with

giggles.

On the small table before Mrs. Dankshire, shaded by a magnificent bunch

of roses, lay that core and crux of all parliamentry dignity, the gavel;

an instrument no self-respecting chairwoman may be without; yet which

she still approaches with respectful uncertainty.

In spite of its large size and high social standing, the Orchardina Home

and Culture Club contained some elements of unrest, and when the yearly

election of officers came round there was always need for careful work

in practical politics to keep the reins of government in the hands of

“the right people.”

Mrs. Thaddler, conscious of her New York millions, and Madam

Weatherstone, conscious of her Philadelphia lineage, with Mrs. Johnston

A. Marrow (“one of the Boston Marrows!” was awesomely whispered of her),

were the heads of what might be called “the conservative party” in this

small parliament; while Miss Miranda L. Eagerson, describing herself as

'a journalist,' who held her place in local society largely by virtue of

the tacit dread of what she might do if offended--led the more radical

element.

Most of the members were quite content to follow the lead of the solidly

established ladies of Orchard Avenue; especially as this leadership

consisted mainly in the pursuance of a masterly inactivity. When wealth

and aristocracy combine with that common inertia which we dignify as

“conservatism” they exert a powerful influence in the great art of

sitting still.

Nevertheless there were many alert and conscientious women in this large

membership, and when Miss Eagerson held the floor, and urged upon the

club some active assistance in the march of events, it needed all Mrs.

Dankshire's generalship to keep them content with marking time.

On this auspicious occasion, however, both sides were agreed in interest

and approval. Here was a subject appealing to every woman present, and

every man but such few as merely “boarded”; even they had memories and

hopes concerning this question.

Solemnly rose Mrs. Dankshire, her full silks rustling about her, and

let one clear tap of the gavel fall into the sea of soft whispering and

guttural murmurs.

In the silence that followed she uttered the momentous announcements:

“The meeting will please come to order,” “We will now hear the reading

of the minutes of the last meeting,” and so on most conscientiously

through officer's reports and committees reports to “new business.”

Perhaps it is their more frequent practice of religious rites, perhaps

their devout acceptance of social rulings and the dictates of fashion,

perhaps the lifelong reiterance of small duties at home, or all these

things together, which makes women so seriously letter-perfect in

parliamentry usage. But these stately ceremonies were ended in course of

time, and Mrs. Dankshire rose again, even more solemn than before, and

came forward majestically.

“Members---and guests,” she said impressively, “this is an occasion

which brings pride to the heart of every member of the Home and Culture

Club. As our name implies, this Club is formed to serve the interests

of The Home--those interests which stand first, I trust, in every human

heart.”

A telling pause, and the light patter of gloved hands.

“Its second purpose,” pursued the speaker, with that measured delivery

which showed that her custom, as one member put it, was to “first write

and then commit,” “is to promote the cause of Culture in this community.

Our aim is Culture in the broadest sense, not only in the curricula of

institutions of learning, not only in those spreading branches of study

and research which tempts us on from height to height”--(“proof of

arboreal ancestry that,” Miss Eagerson confided to a friend, whose

choked giggle attracted condemning eyes)--“but in the more intimate

fields of daily experience.”

“Most of us, however widely interested in the higher education, are

still--and find in this our highest honor--wives and mothers.” These

novel titles called forth another round of applause.

“As such,” continued Mrs. Dankshire, “we all recognize the

difficult--the well-nigh insuperable problems of the”--she glanced at

the gallery now paying awed attention--“domestic question.”

“We know how on the one hand our homes yawn unattended”--(“I yawn

while I'm attending--eh?” one gentleman in the rear suggested to

his neighbor)--“while on the other the ranks of mercenary labor are

overcrowded. Why is it that while the peace and beauty, the security and

comfort, of a good home, with easy labor and high pay, are open to every

young woman, whose circumstances oblige her to toil for her living, she

blindly refuses these true advantages and loses her health and too often

what is far more precious!--in the din and tumult of the factory, or the

dangerous exposure of the public counter.”

Madam Weatherstone was much impressed at this point, and beat her black

fan upon her black glove emphatically. Mrs. Thaddler also nodded; which

meant a good deal from her. The applause was most gratifying to the

speaker, who continued:

“Fortunately for the world there are some women yet who appreciate the

true values of life.” A faint blush crept slowly up the face of Diantha,

but her expression was unchanged. Whoso had met and managed a roomful of

merciless children can easily face a woman's club.

“We have with us on this occasion one, as we my say, our equal in birth

and breeding,”--Madam Weatherstone here looked painfully shocked as also

did the Boston Marrow; possibly Mrs. Dankshire, whose parents were Iowa

farmers, was not unmindful of this, but she went on smoothly, “and

whose first employment was the honored task of the teacher; who has

deliberately cast her lot with the domestic worker, and brought

her trained intelligence to bear upon the solution of this great

question--The True Nature of Domestic Service. In the interests of this

problem she has consented to address us--I take pleasure in introducing

Miss Diantha Bell.”

Diantha rose calmly, stepped forward, bowed to the President and

officers, and to the audience. She stood quietly for a moment, regarding

the faces before her, and produced a typewritten paper. It was clear,

short, and to some minds convincing.

She set forth that the term “domestic industry” did not define certain

kinds of labor, but a stage of labor; that all labor was originally

domestic; but that most kinds had now become social, as with weaving and

spinning, for instance, for centuries confined to the home and done by

women only; now done in mills by men and women; that this process

of socialization has now been taken from the home almost all the

manufactures--as of wine, beer, soap, candles, pickles and other

specialties, and part of the laundry work; that the other processes

of cleaning are also being socialized, as by the vacuum cleaners, the

professional window-washers, rug cleaners, and similar professional

workers; and that even in the preparation of food many kinds are now

specialized, as by the baker and confectioner. That in service itself

we were now able to hire by the hour or day skilled workers necessarily

above the level of the “general.”

A growing rustle of disapproval began to make itself felt, which

increased as she went on to explain how the position of the housemaid is

a survival of the ancient status of woman slavery, the family with the

male head and the group of servile women.

“The keynote of all our difficulty in this relation is that we demand

celibacy of our domestic servants,” said Diantha.

A murmur arose at this statement, but she continued calmly:

“Since it is natural for women to marry, the result is that our domestic

servants consist of a constantly changing series of young girls,

apprentices, as it were; and the complicated and important duties of the

household cannot be fully mastered by such hands.”

The audience disapproved somewhat of this, but more of what followed.

She showed (Mrs. Porne nodding her head amusedly), that so far from

being highly paid and easy labor, house service was exacting and

responsible, involving a high degree of skill as well as moral

character, and that it was paid less than ordinary unskilled labor, part

of this payment being primitive barter.

Then, as whispers and sporadic little spurts of angry talk increased,

the clear quiet voice went on to state that this last matter, the

position of a strange young girl in our homes, was of itself a source of

much of the difficulty of the situation.

“We speak of giving them the safety and shelter of the home,”--here

Diantha grew solemn;--“So far from sharing our homes, she gives up her

own, and has none of ours, but the poorest of our food and a cramped

lodging; she has neither the freedom nor the privileges of a home; and

as to shelter and safety--the domestic worker, owing to her peculiarly

defenceless position, furnishes a terrible percentage of the

unfortunate.”

A shocked silence met this statement.

“In England shop-workers complain of the old custom of 'sleeping

in'--their employers furnishing them with lodging as part payment;

this also is a survival of the old apprentice method. With us, only the

domestic servant is held to this antiquated position.”

Regardless of the chill displeasure about her she cheerfully pursued:

“Let us now consider the economic side of the question. 'Domestic

economy' is a favorite phrase. As a matter of fact our method of

domestic service is inordinately wasteful. Even where the wife does all

the housework, without pay, we still waste labor to an enormous extent,

requiring one whole woman to wait upon each man. If the man hires one

or more servants, the wastes increase. If one hundred men undertake

some common business, they do not divide in two halves, each man having

another man to serve him--fifty productive laborers, and fifty cooks.

Two or three cooks could provide for the whole group; to use fifty is to

waste 47 per cent. of the labor.

“But our waste of labor is as nothing to our waste of money. For, say

twenty families, we have twenty kitchens with all their furnishings,

twenty stoves with all their fuel; twenty cooks with all their wages;

in cash and barter combined we pay about ten dollars a week for our

cooks--$200 a week to pay for the cooking for twenty families, for about

a hundred persons!

“Three expert cooks, one at $20 a week and two at $15 would save to

those twenty families $150 a week and give them better food. The cost

of kitchen furnishings and fuel, could be reduced by nine-tenths; and

beyond all that comes our incredible waste in individual purchasing.

What twenty families spend on individual patronage of small retailers,

could be reduced by more than half if bought by competent persons in

wholesale quantities. Moreover, our whole food supply would rise in

quality as well as lower in price if it was bought by experts.

“To what does all this lead?” asked Diantha pleasantly.

Nobody said anything, but the visible attitude of the house seemed to

say that it led straight to perdition.

“The solution for which so many are looking is no new scheme of any

sort; and in particular it is not that oft repeated fore-doomed failure

called 'co-operative housekeeping'.”

At this a wave of relief spread perceptibly. The irritation roused by

those preposterous figures and accusations was somewhat allayed. Hope

was relit in darkened countenances.

“The inefficiency of a dozen tottering households is not removed by

combining them,” said Diantha. This was of dubious import. “Why should

we expect a group of families to “keep house” expertly and economically

together, when they are driven into companionship by the fact that none

of them can do it alone.”

Again an uncertain reception.

“Every family is a distinct unit,” the girl continued. “Its needs are

separate and should be met separately. The separate house and garden

should belong to each family, the freedom and group privacy of the

common milkman, by a common baker, by a common cooking and a common

cleaning establishment. We are rapidly approaching an improved system of

living in which the private home will no more want a cookshop on the

premises than a blacksmith's shop or soap-factory. The necessary work of

the kitchenless house will be done by the hour, with skilled labor; and

we shall order our food cooked instead of raw. This will give to the

employees a respectable well-paid profession, with their own homes and

families; and to the employers a saving of about two-thirds of the

expense of living, as well as an end of all our difficulties with the

servant question. That is the way to elevate--to enoble domestic

service. It must cease to be domestic service--and become world

service.”

Suddenly and quietly she sat down.

Miss Eagerson was on her feet. So were others.

“Madam President! Madam President!” resounded from several points at

once. Madam Weatherstone--Mrs. Thaddler--no! yes--they really were both

on their feet. Applause was going on--irregularly--soon dropped. Only,

from the group in the gallery it was whole-hearted and consistent.

Mrs. Dankshire, who had been growing red and redder as the paper

advanced, who had conferred in alarmed whispers with Mrs. Ree, and Miss

Massing, who had even been seen to extend her hand to the gavel and

finger it threateningly, now rose, somewhat precipitately, and came

forward.

“Order, please! You will please keep order. You have heard the--we will

now--the meeting is now open for discussion, Mrs. Thaddler!” And she sat

down. She meant to have said Madam Weatherstone, by Mrs. Thaddler was

more aggressive.

“I wish to say,” said that much beaded lady in a loud voice, “that I

was against this--unfortunate experiment--from the first. And I trust it

will never be repeated!” She sat down.

Two tight little dimples flickered for an instant about the corners of

Diantha's mouth.

“Madam Weatherstone?” said the President, placatingly.

Madam Weatherstone arose, rather sulkily, and looked about her. An

agitated assembly met her eye, buzzing universally each to each.

“Order!” said Mrs. Dankshire, “ORDER, please!” and rapped three times

with the gavel.

“I have attended many meetings, in many clubs, in many states,” said

Madam Weatherstone, “and have heard much that was foolish, and some

things that were dangerous. But I will say that never in the course of

all my experience have I heard anything so foolish and so dangerous, as

this. I trust that the--doubtless well meant--attempt to throw light on

this subject--from the wrong quarter--has been a lesson to us all. No

club could survive more than one such lamentable mistake!” And she sat

down, gathering her large satin wrap about her like a retiring Caesar.

“Madam President!” broke forth Miss Eagerson. “I was up first--and have

been standing ever since--”

“One moment, Miss Eagerson,” said Mrs. Dankshire superbly, “The Rev. Dr.

Eltwood.”

If Mrs. Dankshire supposed she was still further supporting the cause of

condemnation she made a painful mistake. The cloth and the fine bearing

of the young clergyman deceived her; and she forgot that he was said to

be “advanced” and was new to the place.

“Will you come to the platform, Dr. Eltwood?”

Dr. Eltwood came to the platform with the easy air of one to whom

platforms belonged by right.

“Ladies,” he began in tones of cordial good will, “both employer and

employed!--and gentlemen--whom I am delighted to see here to-day! I am

grateful for the opportunity so graciously extended to me”--he bowed

six feet of black broadcloth toward Mrs. Dankshire--“by your honored

President.

“And I am grateful for the opportunity previously enjoyed, of listening

to the most rational, practical, wise, true and hopeful words I have

ever heard on this subject. I trust there will be enough open-minded

women--and men--in Orchardina to make possible among us that higher

business development of a great art which has been so convincingly laid

before us. This club is deserving of all thanks from the community

for extending to so many the privilege of listening to our valued

fellow-citizen--Miss Bell.”

He bowed again--to Miss Bell--and to Mrs. Dankshire, and resumed his

seat, Miss Eagerson taking advantage of the dazed pause to occupy the

platform herself.

“Mr. Eltwood is right!” she said. “Miss Bell is right! This is the true

presentation of the subject, 'by one who knows.' Miss Bell has

pricked our pretty bubble so thoroughly that we don't know where

we're standing--but she knows! Housework is a business--like any other

business--I've always said so, and it's got to be done in a business

way. Now I for one--” but Miss Eagerson was rapped down by the

Presidential gavel; as Mrs. Thaddler, portentous and severe, stalked

forward.

“It is not my habit to make public speeches,” she began, “nor my desire;

but this is a time when prompt and decisive action needs to be taken.

This Club cannot afford to countenance any such farrago of mischievous

nonsense as we have heard to-day. I move you, Madam President, that

a resolution of condemnation be passed at once; and the meeting then

dismissed!”

She stalked back again, while Mrs. Marrow of Boston, in clear, cold

tones seconded the motion.

But another voice was heard--for the first time in that assembly--Mrs.

Weatherstone, the pretty, delicate widower daughter-in-law of Madam

Weatherstone, was on her feet with “Madam President! I wish to speak to

this motion.”

“Won't you come to the platform, Mrs. Weatherstone?” asked Mrs.

Dankshire graciously, and the little lady came, visibly trembling, but

holding her head high.

All sat silent, all expected--what was not forthcoming.

“I wish to protest, as a member of the Club, and as a woman, against the

gross discourtesy which has been offered to the guest and speaker of the

day. In answer to our invitation Miss Bell has given us a scholarly and

interesting paper, and I move that we extend her a vote of thanks.”

“I second the motion,” came from all quarters.

“There is another motion before the house,” from others.

Cries of “Madam President” arose everywhere, many speakers were on their

feet. Mrs. Dankshire tapped frantically with the little gavel, but Miss

Eagerson, by sheer vocal power, took and held the floor.

“I move that we take a vote on this question,” she cried in piercing

tones. “Let every woman who knows enough to appreciate Miss Bell's

paper--and has any sense of decency--stand up!”

Quite a large proportion of the audience stood up--very informally.

Those who did not, did not mean to acknowledge lack of intelligence and

sense of decency, but to express emphatic disapproval of Miss Eagerson,

Miss Bell and their views.

“I move you, Madam President,” cried Mrs. Thaddler, at the top of her

voice, “that every member who is guilty of such grossly unparlimentary

conduct be hereby dropped from this Club!”

“We hereby resign!” cried Miss Eagerson. “_We_ drop _you!_ We'll have

a New Woman's Club in Orchardina with some warmth in its heart and some

brains in its head--even if it hasn't as much money in its pocket!”

Amid stern rappings, hissings, cries of “Order--order,” and frantic

“Motions to adjourn” the meeting broke up; the club elements dissolving

and reforming into two bodies as by some swift chemical reaction.

Great was the rejoicing of the daily press; some amusement was felt,

though courteously suppressed by the men present, and by many not

present, when they heard of it.

Some ladies were so shocked and grieved as to withdraw from club-life

altogether. Others, in stern dignity, upheld the shaken standards of

Home and Culture; while the most conspicuous outcome of it all was the

immediate formation of the New Woman's Club of Orchardina.

What Diantha Did · 第 7 / 14 章